Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 52 views

    Civil Writ Petition: Problem-9

    Uploaded by

    Meganath
    This civil writ petition challenges the arrest of JKL, a former employee of Essar Construction Company, by the police inspector of Electronic City, Karnataka on April 29, 2020 without providing any reasons. The petitioner argues that the arrest was illegal and violated natural justice as no opportunity was given to be heard. It is further argued that the detention order is arbitrary and violates the petitioner's right to life and liberty under the Indian Constitution. The petition seeks a writ of habeas corpus or other appropriate order to quash the detention order and release the petitioner.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Civil Writ Petition: Problem-9

    Uploaded by

    Meganath
    52 views3 pages
    This civil writ petition challenges the arrest of JKL, a former employee of Essar Construction Company, by the police inspector of Electronic City, Karnataka on April 29, 2020 without providing any reasons. The petitioner argues that the arrest was illegal and violated natural justice as no opportunity was given to be heard. It is further argued that the detention order is arbitrary and violates the petitioner's right to life and liberty under the Indian Constitution. The petition seeks a writ of habeas corpus or other appropriate order to quash the detention order and release the petitioner.

    Original Title

    PROBLEM 9

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This civil writ petition challenges the arrest of JKL, a former employee of Essar Construction Company, by the police inspector of Electronic City, Karnataka on April 29, 2020 without providing any reasons. The petitioner argues that the arrest was illegal and violated natural justice as no opportunity was given to be heard. It is further argued that the detention order is arbitrary and violates the petitioner's right to life and liberty under the Indian Constitution. The petition seeks a writ of habeas corpus or other appropriate order to quash the detention order and release the petitioner.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    52 views3 pages

    Civil Writ Petition: Problem-9

    Uploaded by

    Meganath
    This civil writ petition challenges the arrest of JKL, a former employee of Essar Construction Company, by the police inspector of Electronic City, Karnataka on April 29, 2020 without providing any reasons. The petitioner argues that the arrest was illegal and violated natural justice as no opportunity was given to be heard. It is further argued that the detention order is arbitrary and violates the petitioner's right to life and liberty under the Indian Constitution. The petition seeks a writ of habeas corpus or other appropriate order to quash the detention order and release the petitioner.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 3

    PROBLEM-9

    CIVIL WRIT PETITION


    SUBMITTED BY

    MEGANATH V

    BA.LLB

    16040141052

    SUBMITTED TO

    Prof.HEENA GHYANSHYAM PATOLI

    ALLIANCE UNIVERSITY

    ALLIANCE UNIVERSITY, BANGALORE


    In the High Court of Bengaluru at Karnataka

    Civil Original (Extra-ordinary) Jurisdiction


    Civil Writ Petition No 34256 of 2020

    In the matter of:

    JKL S/o Anandraj R/o Essar Construction former employee (Inspector Grade-I) in the
    Respondent- Company.

    ...Petitioner

    Essar Construction Company Ltd., a company wholly owned by the Govt. of India and having
    its registered
    office at Bengaluru through its Chairman.

    1. Police inspector of Electronic city,Karnataka


    ...Respondent
    Civil Writ Petition against the order dated 1st day of may 2020 passed by the Managing
    Director, respondent No. 2 herein, by which the services of the petitioner as an employee
    of the respondent-company have been terminated.
    May it please the Hon'ble Chief Justice of the High Court of Karnataka and His
    Lordship's companion Judges.

    The Petitioner

    MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:

    1. That the petitioner is a citizen of India and is therefore entitled to enjoy all the rights
    guaranteed by the Constitution of India.

    2. That respondent No. 1 is the police inspector of Electronic City, Karnataka

    3. That the petitioner was the managing director of Essar construction, a resident in
    Electronic City and he continued to work, earning one promotion also.

    4. That on 29th April 2020 respondent No. 2 herein abruptly arrested Petitioner 1 without
    providing a reason for detention.

    5. That on analysing the situation the arrest of the petitioner without a proper reason leads
    to illegal detention.
    6. That the petitioner has not committed any act that could be termed to be an act
    constituting this arrest.

    7. The detention is being assailed on the following, amongst other,


    GROUNDS

    7.1 That the petitioner being a permanent resident of the arrest could not arrest the petitioner
    without providing proper reason.

    • 7.2  That the principles of natural justice have been contravened by the respondents in
    not giving to the petitioner any opportunity of being heard.

    • 7.3  That the detention is otherwise also erroneous and unsustainable, as it does not
    contain any reason and is a non-speaking order.

    • 7.4  That the detention is arbitrary and contravenes Article 14 of the Constitution.

    • 7.5  That the detention contravenes with Article 21 of the constitution, the right to life
    and liberty and cannot arrest as per their wish.

    8. That the petitioner has not filed any petitioner other proceedings relating to the matter at this
    petition in any other court.

    PRAYER

    In the facts and circumstances stated above the petitioner prays that a direction in the form of a
    writ of habeous corpusand mandamus or any other appropriate writ be issued quashing the
    impugned order and reinstating the petitioner from detention and let him outside.

    It is further prayed that the respondent be burdened with costs.

    THROUGH PETITIONER

    Anandraj

    DATED

    19thth may 2021

    COUNSEL

    Meganath V

    You might also like