3CL1201 Finite Element Method For Structural Engineering
3CL1201 Finite Element Method For Structural Engineering
Engineering
INTRODUCTION
OF
FINITE ELEMENT METHOD
Paresh V. Patel
Department of Civil Engineering
Institute of Technology, Nirma University, Ahmedabad
Inscribing
Circumscribing
1
Area or Perimeter
Exact Solution
No. of Segments
2
Idealization Process
3
FEM/DSM Breakdown
4
DEFINITION
The finite element method is a
numerical method for solving problems
of engineering and mathematical
physics.
Useful for problems with complicated
geometries, loadings, and material
properties where analytical solutions
can not be obtained.
BRIEF HISTORY
Hrennikoff [1941] - Lattice of 1D bars to
McHenry [1943] - Model 3D solids
Courant [1943] - Variational form
Levy [1947, 1953] - Flexibility & Stiffness
Argryis and Kelsey [1954] - Energy Principles for Matrix
Methods
Turner, Clough, Martin and Topp [1956] - 2D elements
Clough [1960] - Term “Finite Elements”
Zienkiewicz [1967] – First book on FEM
Grew out of aerospace industry.
Post-WW II jets, missiles, space flight
Need for light weight structures and accurate stress analysis
Paralleled growth of computers
5
APPLICATIONS
Categories of problems :
Equilibrium Problems (Static)
Eigen Value Problems (Dynamic)
Propagation Problems (Transient)
Areas :
Structural/Stress Analysis
Soil Mechanics
Heat Transfer
Fluid Flow
Electro-Magnetic Fields
Acoustics
ADVANTAGES
Irregular Boundaries
General Loads
Different Materials
Boundary Conditions
Variable Element Size
Easy Modification
Dynamics
Nonlinear Problems (Geometric or
Material)
6
STEPS IN PROCESS
Discretize and Select Element Type
Select a Displacement Function
Derive Element Stiffness Matrix & Load Vector
Assemble element matrices
Introduce B.C.’s
Solve for the primary unknowns i.e. Unknown
Degrees of Freedom
Solve for secondary unknowns i.e. Element
Stresses and Strains, Interpret the Results
ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLE
7
1. Discretization, Select Element
8
3. Calculate Element Properties
• Stiffness Matrix Where,
B = Strain – Displacement Matrix
[Ke] =
E = Strain – Stress Relation
9
6. Solution of Primary Unknowns
Solve for displacements i.e.
{D} = [K]-1 {P}
Direct solution techniques:
Choleskey’s decomposition
Gauss elimination or Gauss Jordon Method
Gauss-Siedel method
Half band Gauss elimination
Skyline solution technique
Frontal technique
COMMERCIAL PACKAGES
• ALGOR
• ANSYS
• COSMOS/M
• STARDYNE
• ABAQUS
• MSC/NASTRAN
• SAP2000
• ADINA
• NISA
• IDEAS
• PRO/E ……………………
10
• Advantages of General Purpose Programs
– Easy input - preprocessor.
– Solves many types of problems
– Modular design - fluids, dynamics, heat, etc.
– Can run on PC’s
– Relatively low cost.
• Disadvantages of General Purpose Programs
– High development costs.
– Less efficient than smaller programs,
– Often proprietary. User access to code limited.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
The Building Structural System - Physical
Building Structure
Floor Diaphragm
Frame and Shear Walls
Lateral Load Resisting System Floor Slab System
Gravity Load Resisting System
(e) 2D Fram e
32
TYPES OF ELEMENTS
• 1 D Elements (Beam type)
– Can be used in 1D, 2D and 2D
– 2-3 Nodes. A, I etc.
Brick Elements
Rz Dz
Dx Dx
Ry
Dy Dy Dy
Rz
Dx Rz Rx Dz Dx Rx
Rz
33
DOF for 2D Elements
Ry ?
Ry ?
Dy Dy
Dy
Rz Dz Dx Rx
Dx Rx
Rz
Plate Shell
Membrane
Dz Dx
Solid/ Brick
34
Slab T = 200 mm
Beam Width, B = 300 mm
Beam Depth, D
a) 300 mm
b) 500 mm
c) 1000 mm
Applications of FEM
Slab T = 200 mm
Beam Width, B = 300 mm
Beam Depth, D
a) 300 mm
b) 500 mm
c) 1000 mm
35
Applications of FEM
Effect of Beam Size on
Moment Distribution
36
• The lateral loads is primarily
resisted by the Axial Force in
the braces, columns and
beams in the braced zone.
• The frame away from the
braced zone does not have
significant moments
• Bracing does not have to be
provided in every bay, but
should be provided in every
story
37
2D Finite Element Model – Gear
38