0% found this document useful (1 vote)
246 views191 pages

Annex 6 Part II

This document provides a compliance checklist for European Union Aviation Safety Agency regulations compared to standards in Annex 6 Part 2 of the International Civil Aviation Organization. It includes the annex reference, EU state legislation and regulation references, level of implementation of standards and recommended practices, text of any differences to be notified to ICAO, and comments on reasons for differences. The first section defines terms like 'acts of unlawful interference', 'aerial work', 'aerodrome', 'aerodrome operating minima', 'aeroplane', and 'agreement summary' and notes any differences between EU regulations and ICAO definitions.

Uploaded by

Reuben C. Lim
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (1 vote)
246 views191 pages

Annex 6 Part II

This document provides a compliance checklist for European Union Aviation Safety Agency regulations compared to standards in Annex 6 Part 2 of the International Civil Aviation Organization. It includes the annex reference, EU state legislation and regulation references, level of implementation of standards and recommended practices, text of any differences to be notified to ICAO, and comments on reasons for differences. The first section defines terms like 'acts of unlawful interference', 'aerial work', 'aerodrome', 'aerodrome operating minima', 'aeroplane', and 'agreement summary' and notes any differences between EU regulations and ICAO definitions.

Uploaded by

Reuben C. Lim
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 191

Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018

European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37


Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 1
Reg. (EU) 300/2008 No Difference Reg. (EC) 300/2008 does
INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS
Reference not include a definition,
AND RECOMMENDED PRACTICES but refers to ‘acts of
unlawful interference’
and to ICAO Annex 17.
Definition

CHAPTER 1.1 DEFINITIONS

When the following terms are used in the Standards and


Recommended Practices for the operation of aeroplanes in
international general aviation, they have the following
meanings:

Acts of unlawful interference. These are acts or attempted


acts such as to jeopardize the safety of civil aviation and
air transport, i.e.:

— unlawful seizure of aircraft in flight,


— unlawful seizure of aircraft on the ground,
— hostage-taking on board an aircraft or on
aerodromes,
— forcible intrusion on board an aircraft, at an airport or
on the premises of an aeronautical facility,
— introduction on board an aircraft or at an airport of a
weapon or hazardous device or material intended for
criminal purposes,
— communication of false information as to jeopardize
the safety of an aircraft in flight or on the ground, of
passengers, crew, ground personnel or the general
public, at an airport or on the premises of a civil
aviation facility.

14-December-2020 Page 1 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 1
Aerial work. An aircraft operation in which an aircraft is used R.(EU) 965/2012: Article 2 Different in Search and rescue The term ‘specialised
Reference for specialized services such as agriculture, construction, (7) character or operations are not included operations’ is used and
photography, surveying, observation and patrol, search other means of in Specialised Operations defined instead of ‘aerial
and rescue, aerial advertisement, etc. compliance (SPO) in the EU system. work’.
They are covered at
Definition national level.

Chapter 1
Aerodrome. A defined area on land or water (including any R.(EU) 2018/1139: Article No Difference
Reference buildings, installations and equipment) intended to be 3, def. (16).R.(EU)
used either wholly or in part for the arrival, departure and 139/2014:Art. 2, def.
surface movement of aircraft. (1);CS ADR DSN

Definition

Chapter 1
Aerodrome operating minima. The limits of usability of an R.(EU) 965/2012: Different in Other means of compliance The EU rules are using
Reference aerodrome for: NCC.OP.110AMC3 character or the old approach
NCC.OP.110 (b) and other means of classification.Rulemaking
a) take-off, expressed in terms of runway visual range (c);AMC5 compliance Task RMT.0379 will
and/or visibility and, if necessary, cloud conditions; NCC.OP.110;AMC6 transpose the ICAO def.
Definition NCC.OP.110.NCO.OP.110; and concepts (2D, 3D)
b) landing in 2D instrument approach operations, AMC1 NCO.OP.110 into R.(EU) 965/2012.
expressed in terms of visibility and/or runway visual (a);GM4 NCO.OP.110
range minimum descent altitude/height (MDA/H)
and, if necessary, cloud conditions; and

c) landing in 3D instrument approach operations,


expressed in terms of visibility and/or runway visual
range and decision altitude/height (DA/H) as
appropriate to the type and/or category of the
operation.

14-December-2020 Page 2 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 1
Aeroplane. A power-driven heavier-than-air aircraft, deriving R.(EU) 965/2012: Annex 1 No Difference
Reference its lift in flight chiefly from aerodynamic reactions on definition (6).R.(EU)
surfaces which remain fixed under given conditions of 923/2012: Article 2
flight. definition (16).

Definition

Chapter 1
Agreement summary. When an aircraft is operating under an
Reference Article 83 bis agreement between the State of Registry
and another State, the agreement summary is a document
transmitted with the Article 83 bis Agreement registered
with the ICAO Council that identifies succinctly and
Definition clearly which functions and duties are transferred by the
State of Registry to that other State.

Note.— The other State in the above definition refers to the


State of the principal location of a general aviation
operator.
Chapter 1
Aircraft. Any machine that can derive support in the R.(EU) 965/2012: Annex I No Difference
Reference atmosphere from the reactions of the air other than the definition (8).R.(EU)
reactions of the air against the earth’s surface. 1321/2014: Art. 2 (a).

Definition

Chapter 1
Air traffic service (ATS). A generic term meaning variously, R.(EU) 2017/373: Annex I: No Difference The European term used
Reference flight information service, alerting service, air traffic def. (21) is 'air traffic service unit'.
advisory service, air traffic control service (area control
service, approach control service or aerodrome control
service).
Definition

14-December-2020 Page 3 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 1
Airworthy. The status of an aircraft, engine, propeller or part R.(EU) 2018/1139: Art. No Difference Term not defined, but
Reference when it conforms to its approved design and is in a 2(d)R.(EU) 748/2012: used with the same
condition for safe operation. 21A.165(c); 21A.307(a) meaning.

Definition

Chapter 1
Alternate aerodrome. An aerodrome to which an aircraft may R.(EU) 965/2012: Annex I, No Difference
Reference proceed when it becomes either impossible or inadvisable definitions (46) and
to proceed to or to land at the aerodrome of intended (110).R.(EU) No 923/2012:
landing where the necessary services and facilities are Art. 2 definition (38).
available, where aircraft performance requirements can be
Definition met and which is operational at the expected time of use.
Alternate aerodromes include the following:

Take-off alternate. An alternate aerodrome at which an


aircraft would be able to land should this become
necessary shortly after take-off and it is not possible
to use the aerodrome of departure.

En-route alternate. An alternate aerodrome at which an


aircraft would be able to land in the event that a
diversion becomes necessary while en route.

Destination alternate. An alternate aerodrome at which


an aircraft would be able to land should it become
either impossible or inadvisable to land at the
aerodrome of intended landing.

Note.— The aerodrome from which a flight departs may


also be an en-route or a destination alternate aerodrome for
that flight.

14-December-2020 Page 4 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 1
Altimetry system error (ASE). The difference between the Reg.(EU) 748/2012:Annex No Difference The ASE definition in the
Reference altitude indicated by the altimeter display, assuming a I (Part 21): CS-ACNS is captured in
correct altimeter barometric setting, and the pressure 21.B.70;CSACNS: the context of RVSM
altitude corresponding to the undisturbed ambient ACNS.A.GEN.005 airworthiness approval.
pressure. 'Definitions'.R.(EU) CS-ACNS provides
Definition 965/2012: SPA.RVSM.115. additional airworthiness
requirements resulting
from airspace (mostly)
and OPS requirements.
Chapter 1
Appropriate airworthiness requirements. The R.(EU) 748/2012:Part-21, No Difference Term not defined but
Reference comprehensive and detailed airworthiness codes 21.B.70R.(EU) 2018/1139: used with the same
established, adopted or accepted by a Contracting State Art. 76 pt.3;Art. 115 pt.3 meaning
for the class of aircraft, engine or propeller under
consideration.
Definition

Chapter 1
Area navigation (RNAV). A method of navigation which R.(EU) 923/2012: Article 2 No Difference
Reference permits aircraft operation on any desired flight path definition (45).R.(EU)
within the coverage of ground- or spaced-based 965/2012:GM1 Annex I
navigation aids or within the limits of the capability of Definitions (c);GM1
self-contained aids, or a combination of these. SPA.PBN.100
Definition
Note.— Area navigation includes performance-based
navigation as well as other operations that do not meet the
definition of performance-based navigation.
Chapter 1
Cabin crew member. A crew member who performs, in the R.(EU) 965/2012: Annex I No Difference CC performs duties
Reference interest of safety of passengers, duties assigned by the definition (12) related to the safety of
operator or the pilot-in-command of the aircraft, but who passengers and flight
shall not act as a flight crew member. during operations.

Definition

14-December-2020 Page 5 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 1
Combined vision system (CVS). A system to display images Less protective Not implemented.Term not The definition will be
Reference from a combination of an enhanced vision system (EVS) or partially used in Reg. (EU) 965/2012. introduced to R.(EU)
and a synthetic vision system (SVS). implemented or 965/2012 via RMT.0379
not (AWO) – NPA 2018/06:
implemented CS-AWO.A.CVS.101
Definition

Chapter 1
Commercial air transport operation. An aircraft operation R.(EU) 2018/1139: Art. 3 No Difference
Reference involving the transport of passengers, cargo or mail for
remuneration or hire.

Definition

Chapter 1
Continuing airworthiness. The set of processes by which an Art. 2 (d) and Art. 3(1) No Difference In the European rules
Reference aircraft, engine, propeller or part complies with the Reg (EU) 1321/2014 continuing airworthiness
applicable airworthiness requirements and remains in a applies for the whole
condition for safe operation throughout its operating life. aircraft. Article 3 requires
that continuing
Definition airworthiness of aircraft
and component shall be
ensured in accordance
with Part-M.
Chapter 1
Continuing airworthiness records. Records which are related R.(EU) 1321/2014: No Difference Term not defined but
Reference to the continuing airworthiness status of an aircraft, M.A.305, types of records
engine, propeller or associated part. M.A.306ML.A.305, specified.
ML.A.306

Definition

14-December-2020 Page 6 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 1
Continuous descent final approach (CDFA). A technique, R.(EU) 965/2012: Annex I No Difference
Reference consistent with stabilized approach procedures, for flying definition (27)
the final approach segment (FAS) of an instrument
non-precision approach (NPA) of a non-precision
instrument approach procedure as a continuous descent,
Definition without level-off, from an altitude/height at or above the
final approach fix altitude/height to a point approximately
15 m (50 ft) above the landing runway threshold or the
point where the flare manoeuvre begins for the type of
aircraft flown; for the FAS of an NPA procedure followed
by a circling approach, the CDFA technique applies until
circling approach minima (circling OCA/H) or visual flight
manoeuvre altitude/height are reached.
Chapter 1
Corporate aviation operation. The non-commercial operation R.(EU) 965/2012:GM1 No Difference The concept is
Reference or use of aircraft by a company for the carriage of Article 2(1)(d) transposed into the
passengers or goods as an aid to the conduct of non-commercial
company business, flown by a professional pilot(s) operations in Reg. (EU)
employed to fly the aircraft. 965/2012.The term is
Definition explained in the GM in
relation to
non-commercial
operations.
Chapter 1
Dangerous goods. Articles or substances which are capable Annex I Reg.(EU) No Difference
Reference of posing a risk to health, safety, property or the 965/2012 (33)
environment and which are shown in the list of
dangerous goods in the Technical Instructions or which
are classified according to those Instructions.
Definition
Note.— Dangerous goods are classified in Annex 18,
Chapter 3.

14-December-2020 Page 7 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 1
Decision altitude (DA) or decision height (DH). A specified R.(EU) No Difference Definition not
Reference altitude or height in a 3D instrument approach operation 965/2012:NCC.OP.210;NC transposed in R.(EU)
at which a missed approach must be initiated if the C.OP.230 965/2012, but term used
required visual reference to continue the approach has with the same
not been established. meaning.The definition
Definition will be introduced in R.
Note 1.— Decision altitude (DA) is referenced to mean (EU) 965/2012 with
sea level and decision height (DH) is referenced to the RMT.0379 (AWO)
threshold elevation.

Note 2.— The required visual reference means that


section of the visual aids or of the approach area which
should have been in view for sufficient time for the pilot to
have made an assessment of the aircraft position and rate of
change of position, in relation to the desired flight path. In
Category III operations with a decision height the required
visual reference is that specified for the particular procedure
and operation.

Note 3.— For convenience where both expressions are


used they may be written in the form “decision
altitude/height” and abbreviated “DA/H”.
Chapter 1
Electronic flight bag (EFB). An electronic information R.(EU) 965/2012: Annex I No Difference
Reference system, comprised of equipment and applications for def. (44a)
flight crew, which allows for the storing, updating,
displaying and processing of EFB functions to support
flight operations or duties.
Definition

14-December-2020 Page 8 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 1
Emergency locator transmitter (ELT). A generic term R.(EU) No Difference
Reference describing equipment which broadcast distinctive signals 965/2012:NCO.IDE.A.170
on designated frequencies and, depending on (a);AMC2 NCC.IDE.A.215
application, may be automatically activated by impact or (a);AMC2
be manually activated. An ELT may be any of the NCO.IDE.A.170 (a)
Definition following:

Automatic fixed ELT (ELT(AF)). An automatically


activated ELT which is permanently attached to an
aircraft.

Automatic portable ELT (ELT(AP)). An automatically


activated ELT which is rigidly attached to an aircraft
but readily removable from the aircraft.

Automatic deployable ELT (ELT(AD)). An ELT which is


rigidly attached to an aircraft and which is
automatically deployed and activated by impact, and,
in some cases, also by hydrostatic sensors. Manual
deployment is also provided.

Survival ELT (ELT(S)). An ELT which is removable from


an aircraft, stowed so as to facilitate its ready use in
an emergency, and manually activated by survivors.
Chapter 1
Engine. A unit used or intended to be used for aircraft Reg.(EU) 748/2012:Annex No Difference
Reference propulsion. It consists of at least those components and I (Part
equipment necessary for functioning and control, but 21):21.B.80;CS-Definitions
excludes the propeller/rotors (if applicable).

Definition

14-December-2020 Page 9 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 1
Enhanced vision system (EVS). A system to display R.(EU) 965/2012: Annex I No Difference
Reference electronic real-time images of the external scene achieved definition (47)
through the use of image sensors.

Note.— EVS does not include night vision imaging


Definition systems (NVIS).

Chapter 1
Extended flight over water. A flight operated over water at a R.(EU) No Difference
Reference distance of more than 93 km (50 NM), or 30 minutes at 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.200;
normal cruising speed, whichever is the lesser, away from NCO.IDE.A.175
land suitable for making an emergency landing.

Definition

Chapter 1
Final approach segment (FAS). That segment of an R.(EU) 965/2012:Annex I – No Difference Term not defined but
Reference instrument approach procedure in which alignment and CDFA definition; AMC4 used with the same
descent for landing are accomplished. NCC.OP.110; NCC.OP.115 meaning.Definition to be
introduced with
RMT.0379 (AWO)
Definition

Chapter 1
Flight crew member. A licensed crew member charged with R.(EU) 965/2012: Annex I, No Difference
Reference duties essential to the operation of an aircraft during a def. (48a).R.(EU) 923/2012
flight duty period. (SERA): Article 2 def. (74)

Definition

Chapter 1
Flight manual. A manual, associated with the certificate of R.(EU) 965/2012: GM1 No Difference
Reference airworthiness, containing limitations within which the NCC.GEN.140(a)(1);GM1
aircraft is to be considered airworthy, and instructions NCO.GEN.135(a)(1)
and information necessary to the flight crew members for
the safe operation of the aircraft.
Definition

14-December-2020 Page 10 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 1
Flight plan. Specified information provided to air traffic R.(EU) 923/2012: Art. 2. No Difference The term ‘ATS flight
Reference services units, relative to an intended flight or portion of (79) plan’ is used in Reg. (EU)
a flight of an aircraft. 965/2012.

Definition

Chapter 1
Flight recorder. Any type of recorder installed in the aircraft Reg.(EU) 965/2012:Annex No Difference
Reference for the purpose of complementing accident/incident I, Def. (49c).Reg. (EU)
investigation. 996/2010: Article 2

Automatic deployable flight recorder (ADFR). A


Definition combination flight recorder installed on the aircraft
which is capable of automatically deploying from the
aircraft.

14-December-2020 Page 11 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 1
Flight simulation training device. Any one of the following R.(EU) 2018/1139: Article No Difference
Reference three types of apparatus in which flight conditions are 3 definition (15).R.(EU)
simulated on the ground: 965/2012: Annex I def.
(50). R.(EU) 1178/2011:
A flight simulator, which provides an accurate FCL.010
Definition representation of the flight deck of a particular
aircraft type to the extent that the mechanical,
electrical, electronic, etc. aircraft systems control
functions, the normal environment of flight crew
members, and the performance and flight
characteristics of that type of aircraft are realistically
simulated;

A flight procedures trainer, which provides a realistic


flight deck environment, and which simulates
instrument responses, simple control functions of
mechanical, electrical, electronic, etc. aircraft
systems, and the performance and flight
characteristics of aircraft of a particular class;

A basic instrument flight trainer, which is equipped with


appropriate instruments, and which simulates the
flight deck environment of an aircraft in flight in
instrument flight conditions.
Chapter 1
Flight time — aeroplanes. The total time from the moment an Reg.(EU) 965/2012: No Difference
Reference aeroplane first moves for the purpose of taking off until ORO.FTL.105 Definitions
the moment it finally comes to rest at the end of the flight. (13)

Note.— Flight time as here defined is synonymous with


Definition the term “block to block” time or “chock to chock” time in
general usage which is measured from the time an aeroplane
first moves for the purpose of taking off until it finally stops
at the end of the flight.

14-December-2020 Page 12 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 1
General aviation operation. An aircraft operation other than R.(EU) 965/2012:Art. 2 No Difference Term not used in Reg.
Reference a commercial air transport operation or an aerial work (1d) (EU) 965/2012. The
operation. operation types
distinguish commercial
operations (CAT and
Definition SPO) and
non-commercial
operations, of the latter
NCC and NCO,
depending on aircraft
complexity. The concept
of General Aviation
operations, as described
by ICAO, is transposed
into Part-NCC and
Part-NCO of Reg. (EU)
No 965/2012. The EU
regulation provides a
definition of commercial
operation.
Chapter 1
Head-up display (HUD). A display system that presents R.(EU) 965/2012: Annex I No Difference
Reference flight information into the pilot’s forward external field of def. (55)
view.

Definition

14-December-2020 Page 13 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 1
Industry codes of practice. Guidance material developed by R.(EU) 965/2012:Annex III No Difference The term is not defined in
Reference an industry body, for a particular sector of the aviation (Part-ORO): AMC1 the Air Operations
industry to comply with the requirements of the ORO.MLR.100 pt. regulation but is used
International Civil Aviation Organization’s Standards and (e);Appendix I with the same meaning
Recommended Practices, other aviation safety (Declaration) under the same name or
Definition requirements and the best practices deemed appropriate. ‘industry standards’.

Note.— Some States accept and reference industry codes


of practice in the development of regulations to meet the
requirements of Annex 6, Part II, and make available, for the
industry codes of practice, their sources and how they may
be obtained.
Chapter 1
Instrument approach operations. An approach and landing R.(EU) 923/2012 (SERA): No Difference Rulemaking Task
Reference using instruments for navigation guidance based on an Art. 2, definition (89a).R. RMT.0379 will transpose
instrument approach procedure. There are two methods (EU) the ICAO def. and
for executing instrument approach operations: 965/2012:NCO.OP.110;A concepts (2D, 3D) into R.
MC3 NCC.OP.110 (b) and (EU) 965/2012.
Definition a) a two-dimensional (2D) instrument approach (c);AMC5
operation, using lateral navigation guidance only; and NCC.OP.110;AMC6
NCC.OP.110;AMC1
b) a three-dimensional (3D) instrument approach NCO.OP.110 (a)
operation, using both lateral and vertical navigation guidance.

Note.— Lateral and vertical navigation guidance


refers to the guidance provided either by:

a) a ground-based radio navigation aid; or

b) computer-generated navigation data from


ground-based, space-based, self-contained
navigation aids or a combination of these.

14-December-2020 Page 14 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 1
Instrument approach procedure (IAP). A series of R.(EU) 923/2012 (SERA): No Difference Rulemaking Task
Reference predetermined manoeuvres by reference to flight Article 2, definition (90). RMT.0379 will transpose
instruments with specified protection from obstacles from the ICAO def. and
the initial approach fix, or where applicable, from the concepts (2D, 3D) into R.
beginning of a defined arrival route to a point from which (EU) 965/2012.
Definition a landing can be completed and thereafter, if a landing is
not completed, to a position at which holding or en-route
obstacle clearance criteria apply. Instrument approach
procedures are classified as follows:

Non-precision approach (NPA) procedure. An


instrument approach procedure designed for 2D
instrument approach operations Type A.

Note.— Non-precision approach procedures


may be flown using a continuous descent final
approach (CDFA) technique. CDFAs with advisory
vertical navigation (VNAV) guidance calculated by
on-board equipment are considered 3D instrument
approach operations. CDFAs with manual
calculation of the required rate of descent are
considered 2D instrument approach operations.
For more information on CDFAs, refer to PANS-OPS
(Doc 8168), Volume I, Part II, Section 5.

Approach procedure with vertical guidance (APV). A


performance-based navigation (PBN) instrument
approach procedure designed for 3D instrument
approach operations Type A.

Precision approach (PA) procedure. An instrument


approach procedure based on navigation systems
(ILS, MLS, GLS and SBAS CAT I) designed for 3D
instrument approach operations Type A or B.

Note.— Refer to Section 2, Chapter 2.2, 2.2.2.2.2, for


instrument approach operation types.

14-December-2020 Page 15 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 1
Instrument meteorological conditions (IMC). R. (EU) 923/2012 (SERA): No Difference Term not defined in R.
Reference Meteorological conditions expressed in terms of Art. 2, def. 91R.(EU) (EU) 965/2012 but used
visibility, distance from cloud, and ceiling,* less than the 965/2012: Annex V: with the same meaning.
minima specified for visual meteorological conditions. SPA.SET-IMC

Definition Note.— The specified minima for visual meteorological


conditions are contained in Chapter 4 of Annex 2.

-------------------------------------------------------------
* As defined in Annex 2.
Chapter 1
Isolated aerodrome. A destination aerodrome for which there R.(EU) No Difference
Reference is no destination alternate aerodrome suitable for a given 965/2012:NCC.OP.105;NC
aeroplane type. O.OP.105

Definition

Chapter 1
Large aeroplane. An aeroplane of a maximum certificated R.(EC) 216/2008:Article 3 No Difference Reg. (EC) No 216/2008
Reference take-off mass of over 5 700 kg. def.(j).R.(EU) uses the term ‘complex
2018/1139:Art. 140.R.(EU) motor-powered aircraft’,
1321/2014:Art. 2 (g) which has not been
transposed into R. (EU)
Definition 2018/1139. The reference
to R. (EU) 2018/1139
indicates the article
containing the transition
period(s) from the old BR
to the new BR.The Air
Ops provisions are more
detailed on the
application to specific
aeroplane
categories/types.

14-December-2020 Page 16 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 1
Low-visibility operations (LVO). Approach operations in
Reference RVRs less than 550 m and/or with a DH less than 60 m
(200 ft) or take-off operations in RVRs less than 400 m.

Definition

Chapter 1
Maintenance.† The performance of tasks required to ensure R.(EU) 1321/2014: Article No Difference
Reference the continuing airworthiness of an aircraft, including any 2 Def. (h) and (j)
one or combination of overhaul, inspection, replacement,
defect rectification, and the embodiment of a modification
or repair.
Definition
-------------------------------------------------------------
† Applicable until 4 November 2020.
Chapter 1
Maintenance.†† The performance of tasks on an aircraft, R.(EU) 1321/2014: Article No Difference
Reference engine, propeller or associated part required to ensure the 2 Def. (h) and (j)
continuing airworthiness of an aircraft, engine, propeller
or associated part including any one or combination of
overhaul, inspection, replacement, defect rectification,
Definition and the embodiment of a modification or repair.

-------------------------------------------------------------
†† Applicable as of 5 November 2020.
Chapter 1
Maintenance programme. A document which describes the R.(EU) 1321/2014: No Difference M.A.302 details the
Reference specific scheduled maintenance tasks and their frequency M.A.302 Appendix I to elements that should be
of completion and related procedures, such as a reliability AMC M.A.302 and AMC included in the
programme, necessary for the safe operation of those M.B.301(b) — Content of maintenance programme.
aircraft to which it applies. the maintenance
Definition programme

14-December-2020 Page 17 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 1
Maintenance release. A document which contains a R.(EU) 1321/2014: No Difference The EU rules use the
Reference certification confirming that the maintenance work to 145.A.50;M.A.801;M.A.8 term "certificate of
which it relates has been completed in a satisfactory 02 release to service"
manner, either in accordance with the approved data and
the procedures described in the maintenance
Definition organization’s procedures manual or under an equivalent
system.
Chapter 1
Maintenance release. A document which contains a R.(EU) 1321/2014: No Difference The EU rules use the
Reference certification confirming that the maintenance work to 145.A.50;M.A.801;ML.A. term "certificate of
which it relates has been completed in a satisfactory 801;M.A.802;ML.A.802 release to service"
manner in accordance with appropriate airworthiness
requirements.
Definition

Chapter 1
Meteorological information. Meteorological report, analysis, R.(EU) No Difference Term not defined in R.
Reference forecast, and any other statement relating to existing or 965/2012:NCC.GEN.140;N (EU) 965/2012 but used
expected meteorological conditions. CO.OP.160 with the same meaning.

Definition

14-December-2020 Page 18 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 1
Minimum descent altitude (MDA) or minimum descent R.(EU) No Difference Term not defined but
Reference height (MDH). A specified altitude or height in a 2D 965/2012:NCO.OP.110;A used with the same
instrument approach operation or circling approach MC1 NCO.OP.110 meaning.New approach
operation below which descent must not be made without (a);AMC3 NCC.OP.110 classification (2D) will be
the required visual reference. (b) and (c);AMC5 transposed through
Definition NCC.OP.110;AMC6 RMT.0379 (All-weather
Note 1.— Minimum descent altitude (MDA) is NCC.OP.110. operations).
referenced to mean sea level and minimum descent height
(MDH) is referenced to the aerodrome elevation or to the
threshold elevation if that is more than 2 m (7 ft) below the
aerodrome elevation. A minimum descent height for a
circling approach is referenced to the aerodrome elevation.

Note 2.— The required visual reference means that


section of the visual aids or of the approach area which
should have been in view for sufficient time for the pilot to
have made an assessment of the aircraft position and rate of
change of position, in relation to the desired flight path. In
the case of a circling approach the required visual reference
is the runway environment.

Note 3.— For convenience when both expressions are


used they may be written in the form “minimum descent
altitude/height” and abbreviated “MDA/H”.

Chapter 1
Modification. A change to the type design of an aircraft, R.(EU) No Difference Term not defined but
Reference engine or propeller. 1321/2014:M.A.304;ML.A used with the same
.304R.(EU) meaning
Note.— A modification may also include the 748/2012:Subpart D
embodiment of the modification which is a maintenance task
Definition subject to a maintenance release. Further guidance on
aircraft maintenance — modification and repair is
contained in the Airworthiness Manual (Doc 9760).

14-December-2020 Page 19 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 1
Navigation specification. A set of aircraft and flight crew R.(EU) No Difference
Reference requirements needed to support performance-based 965/2012:SPA.PBN.105;
navigation operations within a defined airspace. There GM1 SPA.PBN.100
are two kinds of navigation specifications:

Definition Required navigation performance (RNP) specification.


A navigation specification based on area navigation that
includes the requirement for performance monitoring and
alerting, designated by the prefix RNP, e.g. RNP 4, RNP APCH.

Area navigation (RNAV) specification. A navigation


specification based on area navigation that does not include
the requirement for performance monitoring and alerting,
designated by the prefix RNAV, e.g. RNAV 5, RNAV 1.

Note 1.— The Performance-based Navigation (PBN)


Manual (Doc 9613), Volume II, contains detailed guidance
on navigation specifications

Note 2.— The term RNP, previously defined as “a


statement of the navigation performance necessary for
operation within a defined airspace”, has been removed
from this Annex as the concept of RNP has been overtaken by
the concept of PBN. The term RNP in this Annex is now
solely used in the context of navigation specifications that
require performance monitoring and alerting, e.g. RNP 4
refers to the aircraft and operating requirements, including
a 4 NM lateral performance with on-board performance
monitoring and alerting that are detailed in Doc 9613.

14-December-2020 Page 20 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 1
Night. The hours between the end of evening civil twilight R.(EU) 965/2012: Annex I No Difference
Reference and the beginning of morning civil twilight or such other def. (79)
period between sunset and sunrise, as may be prescribed
by the appropriate authority.

Definition Note.— Civil twilight ends in the evening when the


centre of the sun’s disc is 6 degrees below the horizon and
begins in the morning when the centre of the sun’s disc is 6
degrees below the horizon.
Chapter 1
Obstacle clearance altitude (OCA) or obstacle clearance R.(EU) No Difference Term not defined but
Reference height (OCH). The lowest altitude or the lowest height 965/2012:NCC.OP.110;NC used with the same
above the elevation of the relevant runway threshold or O.OP.110;AMC3 meaning.
the aerodrome elevation as applicable, used in NCC.OP.110 (b)and
establishing compliance with appropriate obstacle (c);AMC5
Definition clearance criteria. NCC.OP.110;AMC6
NCC.OP.110;AMC1
Note 1.— Obstacle clearance altitude is referenced to NCO.OP.110
mean sea level and obstacle clearance height is referenced (a);NCO.SPEC.130
to the threshold elevation or in the case of non-precision
approach procedures to the aerodrome elevation or the
threshold elevation if that is more than 2 m (7 ft) below the
aerodrome elevation. An obstacle clearance height for a
circling approach procedure is referenced to the aerodrome
elevation.

Note 2.— For convenience when both expressions are


used they may be written in the form “obstacle clearance
altitude/height” and abbreviated “OCA/H”.

14-December-2020 Page 21 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 1
Operating base. The location from which operational control R.(EU) 965/2012:Annex I Different in Different in character. The concept of 'principal
Reference is exercised. Definitions (97);GM18 character or place of business' is used
Annex I other means of in the Air Ops rules. It is
Note.— An operating base is normally the location compliance defined in Annex I of
where personnel involved in the operation of the aeroplane Reg.(EU) 965/2012. GM18
Definition work and the records associated with the operation are to Annex I provides more
located. An operating base has a degree of permanency explanations on the use
beyond that of a regular point of call. and meaning of this term
for noncommercial
operations.
Chapter 1
Operational control. The exercise of authority over the R.(EU) 965/2012: Annex I No Difference
Reference initiation, continuation, diversion or termination of a def. (91)
flight in the interest of the safety of the aircraft and the
regularity and efficiency of the flight.

Definition

Chapter 1
Operational flight plan. The operator’s plan for the safe R.(EU) 965/2012: GM1 No Difference Term not defined but
Reference conduct of the flight based on considerations of NCC.OP.145 used with the same
aeroplane performance, other operating limitations and (b)NCC.OP.145 meaning.
relevant expected conditions on the route to be followed
and at the aerodromes concerned.
Definition

Chapter 1
Operations manual. A manual containing procedures, R.(EU) 2018/1139: Annex No Difference Term not defined but
Reference instructions and guidance for use by operational V Essential Requirements used with the same
personnel in the execution of their duties. for air operations: pt. meaning.
8.2.R.(EU) 965/2012:
ORO.MLR.100
Definition

14-December-2020 Page 22 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 1
Operator. The person, organization or enterprise engaged in R.(EU) 2018/1139: Art. 3 No Difference The term defined is
Reference or offering to engage in an aircraft operation. Definitions (13) ‘aircraft operator’

Note.— In the context of Annex 6, Part II, the operator is


not engaged in the transport of passengers, cargo or mail for
Definition remuneration or hire.

Chapter 1
Performance-based communication (PBC). Communication Less protective Not implemented. Term not used in R. (EU)
Reference based on performance specifications applied to the or partially 965/2012.PBC will be
provision of air traffic services. implemented or addressed with ED
not Decision to Reg.(EU)
Note.— An RCP specification includes communication implemented 2019/1387.
Definition performance requirements that are allocated to system
components in terms of the communication to be provided
and associated transaction time, continuity, availability,
integrity, safety and functionality needed for the proposed
operation in the context of a particular airspace concept.
Chapter 1
Performance-based navigation (PBN). Area navigation R.(EU) 965/2012:Article 2 No Difference
Reference based on performance requirements for aircraft operating Definitions (5)
along an ATS route, on an instrument approach
procedure or in a designated airspace.

Definition Note.— Performance requirements are expressed in


navigation specifications (RNAV specification, RNP
specification) in terms of accuracy, integrity, continuity,
availability and functionality needed for the proposed
operation in the context of a particular airspace concept.

14-December-2020 Page 23 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 1
Performance-based surveillance (PBS). Surveillance based Less protective Not implemented. Term not used in Reg.
Reference on performance specifications applied to the provision of or partially (EU) 965/2012. PBS will
air traffic services. implemented or be addressed with ED
not Decision to Reg.(EU)
Note.— An RSP specification includes surveillance implemented 2019/1387.
Definition performance requirements that are allocated to system
components in terms of the surveillance to be provided and
associated data delivery time, continuity, availability,
integrity, accuracy of the surveillance data, safety and
functionality needed for the proposed operation in the
context of a particular airspace concept.
Chapter 1
Pilot-in-command. The pilot designated by the operator or R.(EU) 965/2012: Annex I No Difference
Reference the owner as being in command and charged with the def. (96)
safe conduct of a flight.

Definition

Chapter 1
Point of no return. The last possible geographic point at R.(EU) No Difference Term not defined but
Reference which an aircraft can proceed to the destination 965/2012:NCO.OP.105;NC used with the same
aerodrome as well as to an available en-route alternate O.OP.126 meaning.
aerodrome for a given flight.

Definition

Chapter 1
Psychoactive substances. Alcohol, opioids, cannabinoids, R.(EU) 965/2012: Annex I No Difference
Reference sedatives and hypnotics, cocaine, other def. (98a)R.(EU) 923/2012
psychostimulants, hallucinogens, and volatile solvents, (SERA): Article 2 def.
whereas coffee and tobacco are excluded. (104)

Definition

14-December-2020 Page 24 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 1
Repair.† The restoration of an aeronautical product to an R.(EU) 748/2012: No Difference Term not defined but
Reference airworthy condition to ensure that the aircraft continues SUBPART M, used with the same
to comply with the design aspects of the appropriate 21.A.431A(c);SUBPART meaning
airworthiness requirements used for the issuance of the M, 21.A.431B(a)R.(EU)
type certificate for the respective aircraft type, after it has 1321/2014:M.A.304;ML.A
Definition been damaged or subjected to wear. .304

-------------------------------------------------------------
† Applicable until 4 November 2020.
Chapter 1
Repair.†† The restoration of an aircraft, engine, propeller or R.(EU) 748/2012: No Difference Term not defined but
Reference associated part to an airworthy condition in accordance SUBPART M, used with the same
with the appropriate airworthiness requirements after it 21.A.431A(c) ;SUBPART meaning
has been damaged or subjected to wear. M, 21.A.431B(a).R.(EU)
------------------------------------------------------------- 1321/2014:M.A.304;ML.A
Definition †† Applicable as of 5 November 2020. .304.

Chapter 1
Required communication performance (RCP) specification. Less protective Not implemented. Term not used in Reg.
Reference A set of requirements for air traffic service provision and or partially (EU) 965/2012.
associated ground equipment, aircraft capability, and implemented or
operations needed to support performance-based not
communication. implemented
Definition

Chapter 1
Required surveillance performance (RSP) specification. A Less protective Not implemented. Term not used in Reg.
Reference set of requirements for air traffic service provision and or partially (EU) 965/2012.
associated ground equipment, aircraft capability, and implemented or
operations needed to support performance-based not
surveillance. implemented
Definition

14-December-2020 Page 25 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 1
Runway visual range (RVR). The range over which the pilot R.(EU) 965/2012: Annex I No Difference
Reference of an aircraft on the centre line of a runway can see the def. (104)
runway surface markings or the lights delineating the
runway or identifying its centre line.

Definition

Chapter 1
Specific approval. An approval which is documented in the
Reference operations specifications for commercial air transport
operations or in the list of specific approvals for general
aviation operations.

Definition Note.— The terms authorization, specific approval,


approval and acceptance are further described in
Attachment 3.D.
Chapter 1
State of Registry. The State on whose register the aircraft is This is outside the No Difference The term is not defined
Reference entered. competence of the EU. but is used with the same
meaning throughout the
Note.— In the case of the registration of aircraft of an EU regulations.No
international operating agency on other than a national definition since the rules
Definition basis, the States constituting the agency are jointly and mentioning aircraft
severally bound to assume the obligations which, under the registration are specific
Chicago Convention, attach to a State of Registry. See, in enough.
this regard, the Council Resolution of 14 December 1967 on
Nationality and Registration of Aircraft Operated by
International Operating Agencies which can be found in
Policy and Guidance Material on the Economic Regulation of
International Air Transport (Doc 9587).
Chapter 1
State of the Aerodrome. The State in whose territory the R.(EU) 2018/1139: Art. 62 No Difference The term is not defined
Reference aerodrome is located. point 4. but is used with the same
meaning. Regulation (EU)
2018/1139 states
‘Member State where the
Definition aerodrome is located’.

14-December-2020 Page 26 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 1
State of the principal location of a general aviation
Reference operator. The State in which the operator of a general
aviation aircraft has its principal place of business or, if
there is no such place of business, its permanent
residence.
Definition
Note.— Guidance concerning the options for the
principal location of a general aviation operator is
contained in the Manual on the Implementation of Article 83
bis of the Convention on International Civil Aviation (Doc
10059).
Chapter 1
Synthetic vision system (SVS). A system to display Less protective Not implemented. Term not used in Reg.
Reference data-derived synthetic images of the external scene from or partially (EU) 965/2012.This
the perspective of the flight deck. implemented or definition will be inserted
not in R965 through
implemented RMT.0379 (AWO).
Definition

Chapter 1
Target level of safety (TLS). A generic term representing the R.(EU) 965/2012: No Difference
Reference level of risk which is considered acceptable in particular SPA.PBN (GM1
circumstances. SPA.PBN.105(c))

Definition

Chapter 1
Total vertical error (TVE). The vertical geometric difference R.(EU) 965/2012: No Difference
Reference between the actual pressure altitude flown by an aircraft SPA.RVSM.115
and its assigned pressure altitude (flight level).

Definition

14-December-2020 Page 27 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 1
Visual meteorological conditions (VMC). Meteorological R.(EU) 923/2012 (SERA): No Difference
Reference conditions expressed in terms of visibility, distance from Article 2 def. (142)
cloud, and ceiling,* equal to or better than specified
minima.

Definition Note.— The specified minima are contained in Chapter


4 of Annex 2.

-------------------------------------------------------------
* As defined in Annex 2.

14-December-2020 Page 28 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 1
R.(EU) 965/2012: Article 5 No Difference The EU regulations do
CHAPTER 1.2 APPLICABILITY
Reference not distinguish domestic
1.2 operations from
operations between
Member States; they are
The Standards and Recommended Practices contained in
Standard all part of the internal
Annex 6, Part II, shall be applicable to international general
market of aviation.
aviation operations with aeroplanes as described in Section 2
and Section 3.

Note 1.— Standards and Recommended Practices


applicable to the operation of aeroplanes by operators
authorized to conduct international commercial air
transport operations are to be found in Annex 6, Part I.

Note 2.— Standards and Recommended Practices


applicable to international commercial air transport
operations or international general aviation operations
with helicopters are to be found in Annex 6, Part III.

Note 3.— Section 2 of Annex 6, Part II, applies to all


international general aviation aeroplane operations ,
including those covered in Section 3. Section 3 adds
additional requirements for large aeroplanes, turbojet
aeroplanes and corporate aviation operations.

14-December-2020 Page 29 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
CHAPTER 2.1 GENERAL R.(EU) 965/2012: No Difference
Reference NCC.GEN.110 pt.
2.1.1.1 (a);NCO.GEN.110 pt. (a)

Note 1.— Although the Convention on International


Standard
Civil Aviation allocates to the State of Registry certain
functions which that State is entitled to discharge, or
obligated to discharge, as the case may be, the Assembly
recognized, in Resolution A23-13, that the State of Registry
may be unable to fulfil its responsibilities adequately in
instances where aircraft are leased, chartered or
interchanged — in particular without crew — by the
operator of another State and that the Convention may not
adequately specify the rights and obligations of the State of
the operator in such instances until such time as Article 83
bis of the Convention enters into force. Accordingly, the
Council urged that if, in the above-mentioned instances, the
State of Registry finds itself unable to discharge adequately
the functions allocated to it by the Convention, it delegate to
the State of the Operator, subject to acceptance by the latter
State, those functions of the State of Registry that can more
adequately be discharged by the State of the Operator. It
was understood that pending entry into force of Article 83
bis of the Convention the foregoing action would only be a
matter of practical convenience and would not affect either
the provisions of the Chicago Convention prescribing the
duties of the State of Registry or any third State. However, as
Article 83 bis of the Convention entered into force on 20
June 1997, such transfer agreements will have effect in
respect of Contracting States which have ratified the related
Protocol (Doc 9318) upon fulfilment of the conditions
established in Article 83 bis.

Note 2.— In the case of international operations effected


jointly with aeroplanes not all of which are registered in the
same Contracting State, nothing in this Part prevents the

14-December-2020 Page 30 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

States concerned entering into an agreement for the joint


exercise of the functions placed upon the State of Registry by
the provisions of the relevant Annexes.

2.1.1 Compliance with laws, regulations and procedures

2.1.1.1 The pilot-in-command shall comply with the


laws, regulations and procedures of those States in which
operations are conducted.
Chapter 2
2.1.1.2 The pilot-in-command shall be familiar with the R.(EU) 965/2012: No Difference For NCC operators, this
Reference laws, regulations and procedures, pertinent to the ORO.GEN.110 pt. (e), (f), obligation is addressed
2.1.1.2 performance of his or her duties, prescribed for the areas to be (g);NCC.GEN.110 pt. to the operator, not to
traversed, the aerodromes to be used and the air navigation (b);NCO.GEN.110 pt. (b). the pilot-in-command.
facilities relating thereto. The pilot-in-command shall ensure
Standard that other members of the flight crew are familiar with such of
these laws, regulations and procedures as are pertinent to the
performance of their respective duties in the operation of the
aeroplane.

Note.— Information for pilots on flight procedure


parameters and operational procedures is contained in
PANS-OPS (Doc 8168), Volume I. Criteria for the
construction of visual and instrument flight procedures are
contained in PANS-OPS (Doc 8168), Volume II. Obstacle
clearance criteria and procedures used in certain States may
differ from PANS-OPS, and knowledge of these differences is
important for safety reasons.
Chapter 2
2.1.1.3 The pilot-in-command shall have responsibility R.(EU) No Difference The EU rule is addressed
Reference for operational control. 965/2012:NCC.GEN.106;N to the operator not to the
2.1.1.3 CO.GEN.105;ORO.GEN.11 pilot in command.
Note.— The rights and obligations of a State with 0 pt. (c)
respect to the operation of aeroplanes registered in that
Standard State are not affected by this provision.

14-December-2020 Page 31 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.1.1.4 If an emergency situation which endangers the R.(EU) 2018/1139: Annex No Difference
Reference safety or security of the aeroplane or persons necessitates the V: pt. 7.3.R.(EU)
2.1.1.4 taking of action which involves a violation of local regulations 965/2012:ORO.GEN.160;N
or procedures, the pilot-in-command shall notify the CC.GEN.106 pt. (e)AMC1
appropriate local authority without delay. If required by the NCC.GEN.106(e);NCO.GE
Standard State in which the incident occurs, the pilot-in-command shall N.105 pt. (e);AMC1
submit a report on any such violation to the appropriate NCO.GEN.105(e).R.(EU)
authority of such State; in that event, the pilot-in-command 996/2010: Article 4 pt. 1, 7,
shall also submit a copy of it to the State of Registry of the 8, 9.
aeroplane. Such reports shall be submitted as soon as
possible and normally within ten days.
Chapter 2
2.1.1.5 Recommendation.— The pilot-in-command R.(EU) Less protective Partially implemented.No
Reference should have available on board the aeroplane the essential 965/2012:NCC.GEN.140 or partially specific requirement for
2.1.1.5 information concerning the search and rescue services in the implemented or non-commercial
area over which the aeroplane will be flown. not operations with
implemented other-than complex
Recommendation motor-powered aircraft
(NCO).
Chapter 2
2.1.1.6 The pilot-in-command shall ensure that flight R. (EU) 2018/1139:Annex No Difference
Reference crew members demonstrate the ability to speak and IV pt. 1.6.R.(EU)
2.1.1.6 understand the language used for aeronautical 1178/2011: FCL.055.R.(EU)
radiotelephony communications as specified in Annex 1. 965/2012: ORO.FC.100 pt.
(c).
Standard

Chapter 2
2.1.2 Dangerous goods NCO.GEN.140, No Difference
Reference NCC.GEN.150 Reg.(EU)
2.1.2 Note 1.— Provisions for carriage of dangerous goods 965/2012
are contained in Annex 18.

Note Note 2.— Article 35 of the Convention refers to certain


classes of cargo restrictions.

14-December-2020 Page 32 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.1.3 Use of psychoactive substances NCC.GEN.105, No Difference
Reference NCC.GEN.106,
2.1.3 Note.— Provisions concerning the use of psychoactive NCO.GEN.105 Reg.(EU)
substances are contained in Annex 1, 1.2.7 and Annex 2, 2.5. 965/2012 SERA.2020 Reg.
(EU) 923/2012 Part Med
Note Reg. (EU) 1178/2011

Chapter 2
2.1.4 Specific approvals R. (EU) 965/2012:Art. Different in Different in No difference if the
Reference 5(2);Annex V – character or character.Specific specific approvals for
2.1.4 The pilot-in-command shall not conduct operations for which Part-SPA:SPA.GEN.100 (a) other means of Approvals (SPA) shall be PBN, MNPS, RVSM and
a specific approval is required unless such approval has been (2) and (b) compliance issued by the State of the LVO are issued for
issued by the State of Registry. Specific approvals shall Operator. non-commercial
Standard follow the layout and contain at least the information listed in operators using aircraft
Appendix 2.4. registered in a third
country.

14-December-2020 Page 33 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
CHAPTER 2.2 FLIGHT R.(EU) 2018/1139:Annex V No Difference
Reference pt. 2.a.R.(EU) 965/2012:
2.2.1 OPERATIONS NCC.OP.145 pt.
(a);NCO.OP.135 pt. (a)

Standard
2.2.1 Operating facilities

The pilot-in-command shall ensure that a flight will not be


commenced unless it has been ascertained by every
reasonable means available that the ground and/or water
facilities including communication facilities and navigation
aids available and directly required on such flight, for the safe
operation of the aeroplane, are adequate for the type of
operation under which the flight is to be conducted.

Note.— “Reasonable means” in this Standard is


intended to denote the use, at the point of departure, of
information available to the pilot-in-command either
through official information published by the aeronautical
information services or readily obtainable from other
sources.

14-December-2020 Page 34 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.2.2 Operational management R. (EU) 2018/1139:Annex No Difference
Reference V: pt. 3(h)R.(EU)
2.2.2.1 965/2012:NCC.GEN.120;N
2.2.2.1 Operating instructions — general CO.GEN.115.

Standard An aeroplane shall not be taxied on the movement area of an


aerodrome unless the person at the controls is an
appropriately qualified pilot or:

a) has been duly authorized by the owner or in the case


where it is leased the lessee, or a designated agent;

b) is fully competent to taxi the aeroplane;

c) is qualified to use the radio if radio communications


are required; and

d) has received instruction from a competent person in


respect of aerodrome layout, and where appropriate,
information on routes, signs, marking, lights, ATC
signals and instructions, phraseology and
procedures, and is able to conform to the operational
standards required for safe aeroplane movement at
the aerodrome.

14-December-2020 Page 35 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.2.2.2 Aerodrome operating minima R.(EU) 965/2012: Different in Different in characterIn
Reference NCC.OP.110;NCO.OP.110. character or NCC, the rule addresses to
2.2.2.2.1 2.2.2.2.1 The pilot-in-command shall establish other means of the operator, not to the
aerodrome operating minima in accordance with criteria compliance PIC.For low visibility
specified by the State of Registry, for each aerodrome to be operations (LVO), it is the
Standard used in operations. When establishing aerodrome operating competent authority as
minima, any conditions that may be prescribed in the list of established by Annex V
specific approvals shall be observed. Such minima shall not (Part-SPA):State of the
be lower than any that may be established for such Operator if the aircraft is
aerodromes by the State of the Aerodrome, except when registered in an EU Member
specifically approved by that State. State; or State of Registry if
the aircraft is registered in a
Note.— This Standard does not require the State of the third country and the State
Aerodrome to establish aerodrome operating minima. of Registry has already
issued the LVO specific
approval.

14-December-2020 Page 36 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.2.2.2.1.1 The State of Registry shall authorize R.(EU) Less protective Partially implemented.The The approval for
Reference operational credit(s) for operations with aeroplanes equipped 965/2012:SPA.LVO.100 pt. or partially CVS does not receive additional operational
2.2.2.2.1.1 with automatic landing systems, a HUD or equivalent (f) implemented or operational credits will be introduced
displays, EVS, SVS or CVS. Where the operational credit not credits.R.965/2012 currently through RMT.0379
relates to low visibility operations, the State of Registry shall implemented allows only operational (All-Weather Operations
Standard issue a specific approval. Such authorizations shall not affect credits for HUDs and EVS. (AWO)).For
the classification of the instrument approach procedure. non-commercial
operators, the State of
Note 1.— Operational credit includes: Operator approves the
operational credits
a) for the purposes of an approach ban (2.2.4.1.2), a instead of the State of
minima below the aerodrome operating minima; Registry.

b) reducing or satisfying the visibility requirements; or

c) requiring fewer ground facilities as compensated


for by airborne capabilities.

Note 2.— Guidance on operational credit for aircraft


equipped with automatic landing systems, a HUD or
equivalent displays, EVS, SVS and CVS is contained in
Attachment 2.B and in the Manual of All-Weather Operations
(Doc 9365).

Note 3.— Information regarding a HUD or equivalent


displays, including references to RTCA and EUROCAE
documents, is contained in the Manual of All-Weather
Operations (Doc 9365).

14-December-2020 Page 37 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.2.2.2.2 Instrument approach operations shall be R.(EU) 965/2012: No Difference The same level of safety
Reference classified based on the designed lowest operating minima SPA.LVO.110;AMC4 is achieved, but the EU
2.2.2.2.2 below which an approach operation shall only be continued SPA.LVO.100 (a)(2); rules are more
with the required visual reference as follows: AMC5 SPA.LVO.100 (a). prescriptive. RMT.0379
(AWO) will update the
Standard a) Type A: a minimum descent height or decision height approach classification.
at or above 75 m (250 ft); and

b) Type B: a decision height below 75 m (250 ft). Type B


instrument approach operations are categorized as:

1) Category I (CAT I): a decision height not lower


than 60 m (200 ft) and with either a visibility not
less than 800 m or a runway visual range not
less than 550 m;

2) Category II (CAT II): a decision height lower


than 60 m (200 ft) but not lower than 30 m (100 ft)
and a runway visual range not less than 300 m;

3) Category III (CAT III): a decision height lower


than 30 m (100 ft) or no decision height and a
runway visual range less than 300 m or no
runway visual range limitations;

Note 1.— Where decision height (DH) and runway visual


range (RVR) fall into different categories of operation, the
instrument approach operation would be conducted in
accordance with the requirements of the most demanding
category (e.g. an operation with a DH in the range of CAT III
but with an RVR in the range of CAT III would be considered
a CAT III operation or an operation with a DH in the range
of CAT II but with an RVR in the range of CAT I would be
considered a CAT II operation). This does not apply if the
RVR and/or DH has been approved as operational credits.

Note 2.— The required visual reference means that

14-December-2020 Page 38 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

section of the visual aids or of the approach area which


should have been in view for sufficient time for the pilot to
have made an assessment of the aircraft position and rate of
change of position, in relation to the desired flight path. In
the case of a circling approach operation, the required
visual reference is the runway environment.

Note 3.— Guidance on approach classification as it


relates to instrument approach operations, procedures,
runways and navigation systems is contained in the Manual
of All-Weather Operations (Doc 9365).
Chapter 2
2.2.2.2.3 The operating minima for 2D instrument R.(EU) No Difference The same level of safety
Reference approach operations using instrument approach procedures 965/2012:NCC.OP.110;NC is achieved, but the EU
2.2.2.2.3 shall be determined by establishing a minimum descent O.OP.110 and associated rules are more
altitude (MDA) or minimum descent height (MDH), minimum AMC.NCC.OP.111 pt. prescriptive.
visibility and, if necessary, cloud conditions. (b);NCO.OP.111 pt.
Standard (b).For
Note.— For guidance on applying a continuous descent circling:NCC.OP.112;NCO
final approach (CDFA) flight technique on non-precision .OP.112
approach procedures, refer to PANS-OPS (Doc 8168),
Volume I, Part II, Section 5.
Chapter 2
2.2.2.2.4 The operating minima for 3D instrument R.(EU) No Difference The same level of safety
Reference approach operations using instrument approach procedures 965/2012:NCC.OP.110;NC is achieved, but the EU
2.2.2.2.4 shall be determined by establishing a decision altitude (DA) O.OP.110, and associated rules are more
or decision height (DH) and the minimum visibility or RVR. AMC.NCC.OP.111 pt. prescriptive.
(a);NCO.OP.111 pt. (a).
Standard

Chapter 2
2.2.2.2.5 The State of Registry shall issue a specific
Reference approval for instrument approach operations in low visibility
2.2.2.2.5 which shall only be conducted when RVR information is
provided.

Standard Note.— Guidance on low visibility operations is


contained in the Manual of All-Weather Operations (Doc
9365).

14-December-2020 Page 39 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.2.2.2.6 For take-off in low visibility, the State of
Reference Registry shall issue a specific approval for the minimum
2.2.2.2.6 take-off RVR.

Note.— In general, visibility for take-off is defined in


Standard terms of RVR. An equivalent horizontal visibility may also be
used.

Chapter 2
2.2.2.3 Passengers R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.OP.140 pt.
2.2.2.3.1 2.2.2.3.1 The pilot-in-command shall ensure that (a);NCO.OP.130;AMC1
passengers are made familiar with the location and use of: NCO.OP.130.

Standard a) seat belts;

b) emergency exits;

c) life jackets, if the carriage of life jackets is prescribed;

d) oxygen dispensing equipment if the use of oxygen is


anticipated; and

e) other emergency equipment provided for individual


use, including passenger emergency briefing cards.
Chapter 2
2.2.2.3.2 The pilot-in-command shall ensure that all R.(EU) No Difference
Reference persons on board are aware of the location and general 965/2012:NCC.OP.140 pt.
2.2.2.3.2 manner of use of the principal emergency equipment carried (a);NCO.OP.130;AMC1
for collective use. NCO.OP.130

Standard

14-December-2020 Page 40 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.2.2.3.3 In an emergency during flight, the R.(EU) 965/2012: No Difference
Reference pilot-in-command shall ensure that passengers are instructed NCC.OP.140 pt.
2.2.2.3.3 in such emergency action as may be appropriate to the (b);AMC1
circumstances. NCC.OP.140NCO.OP.130;
AMC1 NCO.OP.130.R.
Standard (EU) 2018/1139:Annex V:
pt. 3(f)
Chapter 2
2.2.2.3.4 The pilot-in-command shall ensure that, during R.(EU) No Difference
Reference take-off and landing and whenever considered necessary by 965/2012:NCC.OP.165 pt.
2.2.2.3.4 reason of turbulence or any emergency occurring during (b); NCO.OP.150R.(EU)
flight, all passengers on board an aeroplane shall be secured 2018/1139: Annex V pt. 3.
in their seats by means of the seat belts or harnesses (c)
Standard provided.

14-December-2020 Page 41 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.2.3 Flight preparation R.(EU) 2018/1139: Annex No Difference Requirement (c) not
Reference V pt. 2 (c).R.(EU) specifically mentioned,
2.2.3.1 2.2.3.1 A flight shall not be commenced until the 965/2012:NCC.GEN.106 pt. but it is considered to be
pilot-in-command is satisfied that: (a)(4);NCO.GEN.105 pt. met if airworthiness
(a)(4) requirement in (a) is
Standard a) the aeroplane is airworthy, duly registered and that complied with.
appropriate certificates with respect thereto are
aboard the aeroplane;

b) the instruments and equipment installed in the


aeroplane are appropriate, taking into account the
expected flight conditions;

c) any necessary maintenance has been performed in


accordance with Chapter 2.6;

d) the mass of the aeroplane and centre of gravity


location are such that the flight can be conducted
safely, taking into account the flight conditions
expected;

e) any load carried is properly distributed and safely


secured; and

f) the aeroplane operating limitations, contained in the


flight manual, or its equivalent, will not be exceeded.
Chapter 2
2.2.3.2 Recommendation.— The pilot-in-command R.(EU) 965/2012:For NCC No Difference For NCO, this
Reference should have sufficient information on climb performance only: ORO.GEN.110 pt. information is provided
2.2.3.2 with all engines operating to enable determination of the (i);AMC2 ORO.MLR.100 through the Aircraft
climb gradient that can be achieved during the departure pt. (p) Flight Manual or Pilot’s
phase for the existing take-off conditions and intended Operating Handbook.
Recommendation take-off technique.

14-December-2020 Page 42 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.2.3.3 Flight planning R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.OP.145 pt.
2.2.3.3 Before commencing a flight the pilot-in-command shall be (b);NCO.OP.135 pt. (b)
familiar with all available meteorological information
appropriate to the intended flight. Preparation for a flight
Standard away from the vicinity of the place of departure, and for every
flight under the instrument flight rules, shall include:

a) a study of available current weather reports and


forecasts; and

b) the planning of an alternative course of action to


provide for the eventuality that the flight cannot be
completed as planned, because of weather
conditions.

Note 1.— It is the practice in some States to declare, for


flight planning purposes, higher minima for an aerodrome
when nominated as an alternate, than for the same
aerodrome when planned as that of intended landing.

Note 2.— The requirements for flight plans are


contained in Annex 2 — Rules of the Air and Procedures for
Air Navigation Services — Air Traffic Management
(PANS-ATM, Doc 4444).

Chapter 2
2.2.3.4 Meteorological conditions R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.OP.180 pt.
2.2.3.4.1 2.2.3.4.1 A flight to be conducted in accordance with (a) and (c);NCO.OP.160
VFR shall not be commenced unless current meteorological pt. (a) and (c)
reports or a combination of current reports and forecasts
Standard indicate that the meteorological conditions along the route or
that part of the route to be flown under VFR will, at the
appropriate time, be such as to enable compliance with these
rules.

14-December-2020 Page 43 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.2.3.4.2 A flight to be conducted in accordance with the R.(EU) No Difference
Reference instrument flight rules shall not: 965/2012:NCC.OP.180 pt.
2.2.3.4.2 (b);GM1
a) take off from the departure aerodrome unless the NCC.OP.180;NCO.OP.160
meteorological conditions, at the time of use, are at pt. (b);GM1 NCO.OP.160.
Standard
or above the aerodrome operating minima for that
operation; and

b) take off or continue beyond the point of in-flight


re-planning unless at the aerodrome of intended
landing or at each alternate aerodrome to be selected
in compliance with 2.2.3.5, current meteorological
reports or a combination of current reports and
forecasts indicate that the meteorological conditions
will be, at the estimated time of use, at or above the
aerodrome operating minima for that operation.
Chapter 2
2.2.3.4.3 The State of Registry shall establish criteria to R.(EU) 965/2012: Less protective Partially It is the State of Operator
Reference be used for the estimated time of use of an aerodrome NCC.OP.150 pt. or partially implementedNCC.OP.150, instead of the State of
2.2.3.4.3 including a margin of time. (c);NCC.OP.151;NCC.OP. implemented or NCC.OP.180: No margin Registry that shall
180;NCO.OP.140;NCO.OP not defined for destination establish those criteria.
Note.— A widely accepted time margin for “estimated .160 implemented aerodrome, but margin
Standard
time of use” is one hour before and after the earliest and defined in NCC.OP.151 and
latest time of arrival. Additional considerations can be NCO.OP.140 for alternate
found in the Flight Planning and Fuel Management (FPFM) aerodromes. NCO.OP.160:
Manual (Doc 9976). margin not defined.
Chapter 2
2.2.3.4.4 A flight to be operated in known or expected R.(EU) 2018/1139: Annex No Difference
Reference icing conditions shall not be commenced unless the aeroplane V: Point 2.(e). R.(EU)
2.2.3.4.4 is certificated and equipped to cope with such conditions. 965/2012:NCC.OP.190;NC
O.OP.170

Standard

14-December-2020 Page 44 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.2.3.4.5 A flight to be planned or expected to operate in R.(EU) No Difference
Reference suspected or known ground icing conditions shall not take off 965/2012:NCC.OP.185;NC
2.2.3.4.5 unless the aeroplane has been inspected for icing and, if O.OP.165;NCO.OP.170
necessary, has been given appropriate de-icing/anti-icing
treatment. Accumulation of ice or other naturally occurring
Standard contaminants shall be removed so that the aeroplane is kept in
an airworthy condition prior to take-off.

Note.— Guidance material is given in the Manual of


Aircraft Ground De-icing/Anti-icing Operations (Doc 9640).

14-December-2020 Page 45 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.2.3.5 Alternate aerodromes R.(EU) Different in Other means of compliance.
Reference 965/2012:NCC.OP.151;NC character or European rules require a
2.2.3.5 Destination alternate aerodromes O.OP.140 other means of period commencing one
compliance hour before and ending one
For a flight to be conducted in accordance with the instrument hour after the estimated
Standard flight rules, at least one destination alternate aerodrome shall time of arrival at the
be selected and specified in the flight plans, unless: aerodrome in accordance
with 2.2.3.4.3. European
a) the duration of the flight from the departure rules do not require a point
aerodrome, or from the point of in-flight re-planning, of no return but instead
to the destination aerodrome is such that, taking into require always to have an
account all meteorological conditions and alternate aerodrome (with
operational information relevant to the flight, at the very few exceptions e.g.
estimated time of use, a reasonable certainty exists isolated aerodrome) and
that: other conditions (e.g. EU
rules require fuel for 2
1) the approach and landing may be made under hours).
visual meteorological conditions; and

2) separate runways are usable at the estimated


time of use of the destination aerodrome with at
least one runway having an operational
instrument approach procedure; or

b) the aerodrome of intended landing is isolated and:

1) a standard instrument approach procedure is


prescribed for the aerodrome of intended
landing;

2) a point of no return has been determined; and

3) a flight shall not be continued past the point of


no return unless available current meteorological
information indicates that the following
meteorological conditions will exist at the
estimated time of use:

14-December-2020 Page 46 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

i) a cloud base of at least 300 m (1 000 ft)


above the minimum associated with the
instrument approach procedure; and

ii) visibility of at least 5.5 km (3 NM) or of 4 km


(2 NM) more than the minimum associated
with the instrument approach procedure.

Note.— Separate runways are two or more runways at


the same aerodrome configured such that if one runway is
closed, operations to the other runway(s) can be conducted.

14-December-2020 Page 47 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.2.3.6 Fuel and oil requirements R.(EU) Less protective Partially
Reference 965/2012:NCC.OP.130;NC or partially implemented.PartNCO
2.2.3.6.1 2.2.3.6.1 A flight shall not be commenced unless, taking O.OP.125 implemented or allows for lower criteria for
into account both the meteorological conditions and any not VFR Ato-A flights when
delays that are expected in flight, the aeroplane carries implemented remaining in sight of the
Standard sufficient fuel and oil to ensure that it can safely complete the aerodrome/landing site.
flight. The amount of fuel to be carried must permit:

a) when the flight is conducted in accordance with the


instrument flight rules and a destination alternate
aerodrome is not required in accordance with 2.2.3.5,
or when the flight is to an isolated aerodrome, flight
to the aerodrome of intended landing, and after that,
have a final reserve fuel for at least 45 minutes at
normal cruising altitude; or

b) when the flight is conducted in accordance with the


instrument flight rules and a destination alternate
aerodrome is required, flight to the aerodrome of
intended landing, then to an alternate aerodrome,
and after that, have a final reserve fuel for at least 45
minutes at normal cruising altitude; or

c) when the flight is conducted in accordance with day


VFR, flight to the aerodrome of intended landing, and
after that, have a final reserve fuel for at least 30
minutes at normal cruising altitude; or

d) when the flight is conducted in accordance with


night VFR, flight to the aerodrome of intended
landing and thereafter have a final reserve fuel for at
least 45 minutes at normal cruising altitude.

Note 1.— Nothing in 2.2.3.6 precludes amendment of a


flight plan in flight in order to replan the flight to another
aerodrome, provided that the requirements of 2.2.3.6 can be
complied with from the point where the flight is replanned.

14-December-2020 Page 48 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Note 2.— Guidance on planning operations to isolated


aerodromes is contained in the Flight Planning and Fuel
Management (FPFM) Manual (Doc 9976).
Chapter 2
2.2.3.6.2 The use of fuel after flight commencement for R.(EU) No Difference
Reference purposes other than originally intended during pre-flight 965/2012:NCC.OP.130 pt.
2.2.3.6.2 planning shall require a re-analysis and, if applicable, (c);NCO.OP.125 pt. (c)
adjustment of the planned operation.

Standard

Chapter 2
2.2.3.7 Refuelling with passengers on board R.(EU) More Exacting EU rules do not allow
Reference 965/2012:NCC.OP.155;NC or Exceeds embarking, on board or
2.2.3.7.1 2.2.3.7.1 Recommendation.— An aeroplane should not O.OP.145 disembarking of
be refuelled when passengers are embarking, on board or passengers while
disembarking unless it is attended by the pilot-in-command refuelling with AVGAS or
Recommendation or other qualified personnel ready to initiate and direct an wide-cut type fuel or a
evacuation of the aeroplane by the most practical and mixture of these fuel
expeditious means available. types.

14-December-2020 Page 49 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.2.3.7.2 Recommendation.— When refuelling with R.(EU) No Difference
Reference passengers embarking, on board or disembarking, two-way 965/2012:NCC.OP.155;A
2.2.3.7.2 communications should be maintained by the aeroplane’s MC1 NCC.OP.155
intercommunication system or other suitable means between (c);NCO.OP.145;AMC1
the ground crew supervising the refuelling and the NCO.OP.145.
Recommendation pilot-in-command or other qualified personnel required by
2.2.3.7.1.

Note 1.— The provisions of 2.2.3.7.1 do not necessarily


require the deployment of integral aeroplane stairs or the
opening of emergency exits as a prerequisite to refuelling.

Note 2.— Provisions concerning aircraft refuelling are


contained in Annex 14, Volume I, and guidance on safe
refuelling practices is contained in the Airport Services
Manual (Doc 9137), Parts 1 and 8.

Note 3.— Additional precautions are required when


refuelling with fuels other than aviation kerosene or when
refuelling results in a mixture of aviation kerosene with
other aviation turbine fuels, or when an open line is used.

14-December-2020 Page 50 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.2.3.8 Oxygen supply R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.195;
2.2.3.8 The pilot-in-command shall ensure that breathing oxygen is NCC.IDE.A.200;NCO.IDE.
available to crew members and passengers in sufficient A.150;NCO.IDE.A.155
quantities for all flights at such altitudes where a lack of
Standard oxygen might result in impairment of the faculties of crew
members or harmfully affect passengers.

Note 1.— Guidance on the carriage and use of oxygen is


given in Attachment 2.A.

Note 2.— Approximate altitudes in the Standard


Atmosphere corresponding to the values of absolute pressure
used in the text of Attachment 2.A are as follows:

Chapter 2
2.2.4 In-flight procedures R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.OP.180;NC
2.2.4.1.1 O.OP.160.
2.2.4.1 Aerodrome operating minima

Standard 2.2.4.1.1 A flight shall not be continued towards the


aerodrome of intended landing, unless the latest available
information indicates that at the expected time of arrival, a
landing can be effected at that aerodrome or at least one
destination alternate aerodrome, in compliance with the
operating minima established in accordance with 2.2.2.2.

14-December-2020 Page 51 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.2.4.1.2 An instrument approach shall not be continued R.(EU) No Difference
Reference below 300 m (1 000 ft) above the aerodrome elevation or into 965/2012:NCC.OP.230 pt.
2.2.4.1.2 the final approach segment unless the reported visibility or (a) & (b);NCO.OP.210 pt.
controlling RVR is at or above the aerodrome operating (a) & (b).R. (EU)
minima. 2018/1139:Annex V: pt. 3
Standard (e)
Note.— Criteria for the final approach segment is
contained in PANS-OPS (Doc 8168), Volume II.
Chapter 2
2.2.4.1.3 If, after entering the final approach segment or R.(EU) 965/2012: No Difference
Reference after descending below 300 m (1 000 ft) above the aerodrome NCC.OP.230 pt. (d) &
2.2.4.1.3 elevation, the reported visibility or controlling RVR falls below (e);NCO.OP.210 pt. (d) &
the specified minimum, the approach may be continued to (e).R. (EU)
DA/H or MDA/H. In any case, an aeroplane shall not 2018/1139:Annex V: pt. 3
Standard continue its approach-to-land beyond a point at which the (e)
limits of the aerodrome operating minima would be infringed.

Note.— Controlling RVR means the reported values of


one or more RVR reporting locations (touchdown, midpoint
and stop-end) used to determine whether operating minima
are or are not met. Where RVR is used, the controlling RVR is
the touchdown RVR, unless otherwise specified by State
criteria.

Chapter 2
2.2.4.2 Weather reporting by pilots R.(EU) No Difference
Reference (Applicable until 4 November 2020) 965/2012:NCC.GEN.106 pt.
2.2.4.2.1 (c);NCO.GEN.105 pt.
Recommendation.— When weather conditions likely to (d).R.(EU)
affect the safety of other aircraft are encountered, they 923/2012:SERA.12001,
Recommendation should be reported as soon as possible. SERA.12005

Note.— The procedures for making meteorological


observations on board aircraft in flight and for recording
and reporting them are contained in Annex 3, the PANS-ATM
(Doc 4444) and the appropriate Regional Supplementary
Procedures (Doc 7030).

14-December-2020 Page 52 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.2.4.2 Meteorological and operational observations by R.(EU) No Difference
Reference pilots 965/2012:NCC.GEN,106 pt.
2.2.4.2.1 (Applicable as of 5 November 2020) (c);NCO.GEN.105 pt.
(d).R.(EU)
2.2.4.2.1 Recommendation.— When meteorological 923/2012:SERA.12001,
Recommendation conditions likely to affect the safety of other aircraft are SERA.12005
encountered, they should be reported as soon as possible.

Note.— The procedures for making meteorological


observations on board aircraft in flight and for recording
and reporting them are contained in Annex 3, the PANS-ATM
(Doc 4444) and the appropriate Regional Supplementary
Procedures (Doc 7030).
Chapter 2
2.2.4.2.2 Recommendation.— The pilot-in-command R.(EU) 965/2012:AMC1 No Difference
Reference should report runway braking action when the runway NCO.OP.205;AMC1
2.2.4.2.2 braking action encountered is not as good as reported. NCC.OP.225;

Note.— The procedures for making special air-reports


Recommendation regarding runway braking action are contained in the
PANS-ATM (Doc 4444), Chapter 4, and Appendix 1.

Chapter 2
2.2.4.3 Hazardous flight conditions R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.GEN.106 pt.
2.2.4.3.1 Recommendation.— Hazardous flight conditions (c);NCO.GEN.105 pt. (d)
encountered, other than those associated with
meteorological conditions, should be reported to the
Recommendation appropriate aeronautical station as soon as possible. The
reports so rendered should give such details as may be
pertinent to the safety of other aircraft.

14-December-2020 Page 53 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.2.4.4 Flight crew members at duty stations R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.GEN.105 pt.
2.2.4.4.1 2.2.4.4.1 Take-off and landing. All flight crew members (b);NCO.GEN.105 pt. (b)
required to be on flight deck duty shall be at their stations.

Standard -------------------------------------------------------------
In 2020, paragraph 2.2.4.4 will be renumbered as 2.2.4.5.
Chapter 2
2.2.4.4.2 En route. All flight crew members required to R.(EU) No Difference
Reference be on flight deck duty shall remain at their stations except 965/2012:NCC.GEN.105 pt.
2.2.4.4.2 when their absence is necessary for the performance of duties (b);NCO.GEN.105 pt.
in connection with the operation of the aeroplane or for (b).R.(EU)
physiological needs. 2018/1139:Annex V: pt. 3
Standard (b)

Chapter 2
2.2.4.4.3 Seat belts. All flight crew members shall keep R.(EU) No Difference
Reference their seat belts fastened when at their stations. 965/2012:NCC.GEN.105 pt.
2.2.4.4.3 (c);NCO.GEN.105 pt. (f)
(1).R.(EU)
2018/1139:Annex V: pt. 3
Standard (b)

Chapter 2
2.2.4.4.4 Safety harness. When safety harnesses are R.(EU) No Difference
Reference provided, any flight crew member occupying a pilot’s seat 965/2012:NCC.GEN.105 pt.
2.2.4.4.4 shall keep the safety harness fastened during the take-off and (c);NCO.GEN.105 pt. (f)
landing phases; all other flight crew members shall keep their (1).R.(EU)
safety harnesses fastened during the take-off and landing 2018/1139:Annex V: pt. 3
Standard phases unless the shoulder straps interfere with the (a)
performance of their duties, in which case the shoulder straps
may be unfastened but the seat belt must remain fastened.

Note.— Safety harness includes shoulder strap(s) and a


seat belt which may be used independently.

14-December-2020 Page 54 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.2.4.4 Aeroplane operating procedures for landing R.(EU) No Difference
Reference performance 965/2012:NCC.OP.225AM
2.2.4.4.1 (As of 5 November 2020) C1
NCC.OP.225NCO.OP.205
Recommendation.— An approach to land should not be AMC1 NCO.OP.205
Recommendation continued below 300 m (1 000 ft) above aerodrome
elevation unless the pilot-in-command is satisfied that, with
the runway surface condition information available, the
aeroplane performance information indicates that a safe
landing can be made.

Note 1.— The procedures for using runway surface


condition information on board aircraft are contained in the
PANS-Aerodromes (Doc 9981) and in the performance
section of the aeroplane flight manual; and for aeroplanes
certificated in accordance with Annex 8, Part IIIB, in the
Aeroplane Performance Manual (Doc 10064).

Note 2.— Guidance on development of aeroplane


performance information for aeroplanes certificated in
accordance with Annex 8, Part IIIB is contained in the
Aeroplane Performance Manual (Doc 10064).
Chapter 2
2.2.4.5 Use of oxygen R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.OP.210;NC
2.2.4.5 All flight crew members, when engaged in performing duties O.OP.190.AMC1
essential to the safe operation of an aeroplane in flight, shall NCO.OP.190(a)
use breathing oxygen continuously whenever the
Standard circumstances prevail for which its supply has been
prescribed in 2.2.3.8.

14-December-2020 Page 55 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.2.4.6 Safeguarding of cabin crew and passengers in R.(EU) Less protective Partially
Reference pressurized aeroplanes 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.195; or partially implemented.Fully
2.2.4.6.1 in the event of loss of pressurization* NCO.IDE.A.150 implemented or implemented for NCC.An
not alleviation is available for
Recommendation.— Cabin crew should be safeguarded implemented NCO operations. The EU
Recommendation so as to ensure reasonable probability of their retaining rules contain an
consciousness during any emergency descent which may be alleviation to the
necessary in the event of loss of pressurization and, in availability and use of
addition, they should have such means of protection as will oxygen on board under
enable them to administer first aid to passengers during NCO.OP.190 and AMC1
stabilized flight following the emergency. Passengers should NCO.OP.190(a). The PIC
be safeguarded by such devices or operational procedures can decide to fly at any
as will ensure reasonable probability of their surviving the altitude without using
effects of hypoxia in the event of loss of pressurization. oxygen, and without
oxygen being available.
Note.— It is not envisaged that cabin crew will always AMC1 NCO.OP.190(a)
be able to provide assistance to passengers during additionally states: “(…)
emergency descent procedures which may be required in the the PIC should: (…)(b)(2)
event of loss of pressurization. if detecting early
symptoms of hypoxia
conditions: (i) consider
------------------------------------------------------------- to return to a safe
In 2020, paragraphs 2.2.4.5 to 2.2.4.8 will be renumbered as 2.2.4.6 altitude, and (ii) ensure
to 2.2.4.9. that supplemental
oxygen is used, if
available.”

14-December-2020 Page 56 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.2.4.7 In-flight fuel management* R.(EU) Different in Other means of
Reference 965/2012:NCC.OP.205 pt. character or compliance.Part-NCC and
2.2.4.7.1 2.2.4.7.1 The pilot-in-command shall monitor the amount (b);NCO.OP.185 other means of Part-NCO do not define
of usable fuel remaining on board to ensure it is not less than compliance final reserve fuel as such.
the fuel required to proceed to an aerodrome where a safe Instead, NCC.OP.130 and
Standard landing can be made with the planned final reserve fuel NCO.OP.125 indicate the
remaining. amount of minutes for the
required final reserve fuel.
-------------------------------------------------------------
In 2020, paragraphs 2.2.4.5 to 2.2.4.8 will be renumbered as 2.2.4.6
to 2.2.4.9.
Chapter 2
2.2.4.7.2 The pilot-in-command shall advise ATC of a R.(EU) 923/2012 (amended Less protective Partially implemented with The phraseology is
Reference minimum fuel state by declaring MINIMUM FUEL when, by R.(EU) or partially the SERA requirements. addressed in a Safety
2.2.4.7.2 having committed to land at a specific aerodrome, the pilot 2016/1185):SERA.11012;S implemented or SERA includes the Information Bulletin (SIB
calculates that any change to the existing clearance to that ERA Appendix 1 to AMC1 not declaration of MINIMUM 2018-08) and applicable
aerodrome, or other air traffic delays, may result in landing SERA.14001;GM1 implemented FUEL. to all types of operation.
Standard with less than the planned final reserve fuel. SERA.11012 The standard will be
transposed through
Note.— The declaration of MINIMUM FUEL informs RMT.0573 also in Reg.
ATC that all planned aerodrome options have been reduced (EU) No 965/2012.
to a specific aerodrome of intended landing and any change
to the existing clearance, or air traffic delays, may result in
landing with less than the planned final reserve fuel. This is
not an emergency situation but an indication that an
emergency situation is possible should any additional delay
occur.

14-December-2020 Page 57 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.2.4.7.3 The pilot-in-command shall declare a situation R.(EU) 923/2012 (amended Less protective Partially implemented with The standard will be
Reference of fuel emergency by broadcasting MAYDAY MAYDAY by R.(EU) or partially the requirements in SERA. transposed into
2.2.4.7.3 MAYDAY FUEL, when the calculated usable fuel estimated to 2016/1185):SERA implemented or Regulation (EU) 965/2012
be available upon landing at the nearest aerodrome where a 11012;Appendix 1 to not through RMT.0573.
safe landing can be made is less than the planned final reserve AMC1 SERA.14001R.(EU) implemented
Standard fuel. 965/2012:CAT.OP.MPA.28
0 pt. (b)(3)
Note 1.— The planned final reserve fuel refers to the
value calculated in 2.2.3.6 and is the minimum amount of
fuel required upon landing at any aerodrome.

Note 2.— The words “MAYDAY FUEL” describe the


nature of the distress conditions as required in Annex 10,
Volume II, 5.3.2.1.1, b) 3).

Chapter 2
2.2.4.8 Instrument approach procedures* R.(EU) 139/2014: No Difference Some European
Reference ADR.OR.C.005(b) aerodromes are excluded
2.2.4.8.1 2.2.4.8.1 One or more instrument approach procedures from the Basic
designed to support instrument approach operations shall be Regulation (EU)
approved and promulgated by the State in which the 2018/1139 (Art. 2 point
Standard aerodrome is located to serve each instrument runway or 1(e) and remain under the
aerodrome utilized for instrument flight operations. Member State regulatory
system (mainly those
------------------------------------------------------------- where no CAT
In 2020, paragraphs 2.2.4.5 to 2.2.4.8 will be renumbered as 2.2.4.6 operations are
to 2.2.4.9. conducted).Each
Member State should
determine its own level of
implementation.

14-December-2020 Page 58 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.2.4.8.2 Aeroplanes operated in accordance with the R.(EU) Less protective Other means of
Reference instrument flight rules shall comply with the instrument 965/2012:NCC.OP.115 pt. or partially compliance.European
2.2.4.8.2 approach procedures approved by the State in which the (a);NCO.OP.115 pt. (a). implemented or regulation allows
aerodrome is located. not acceptable deviations under
implemented the conditions of radar
Standard Note 1.— See 2.2.2.2.1 for instrument approach vectoring by ATC or when
operation classifications. obstacle clearance can be
observed.
Note 2.— Information for pilots on flight procedure
parameters and operational procedures is contained in
PANS-OPS, Volume I. Criteria for the construction of visual
and instrument flight procedures are contained in
PANS-OPS, Volume II. Obstacle clearance criteria and
procedures used in certain States may differ from PANS-OPS,
and knowledge of these differences is important for safety
reasons (see 2.1.1.1).

Chapter 2
2.2.5 Duties of pilot-in-command R. (EU) No Difference Security covered at a
Reference 965/2012:NCC.GEN.106 pt. more general level, under
2.2.5.1 2.2.5.1 The pilot-in-command shall be responsible for (a)(1);NCO.GEN.105 pt. the operator’s
the operation, safety and security of the aeroplane and the (a)(1).R.(EU) responsibility (Annex V:
safety of all crew members, passengers and cargo on board. 2018/1139:Annex V: pt. 1.3 pt. 8.4)
Standard

14-December-2020 Page 59 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.2.5.2 The pilot-in-command shall be responsible for R.(EU) No Difference Fully implemented, but
Reference ensuring that a flight: 965/2012:NCC.GEN.106 pt. provisions are made for
2.2.5.2 (a)(5)&(6);NCO.GEN.105 NCC multi-crew
a) will not be commenced if any flight crew member is pt. (a)(5)&(6) operations to continue
incapacitated from performing duties by any cause the flight beyond the
Standard such as injury, sickness, fatigue, the effects of any nearest weather
psychoactive substance; and permissible aerodrome if
mitigation measures are
b) will not be continued beyond the nearest suitable in place such as the use
aerodrome when flight crew members’ capacity to of additional crew
perform functions is significantly reduced by members and/or
impairment of faculties from causes such as fatigue, controlled rest during
sickness or lack of oxygen. flight (AMC1
NCC.GEN.106(d).
Chapter 2
2.2.5.3 The pilot-in-command shall be responsible for R.(EU) No Difference
Reference notifying the nearest appropriate authority by the quickest 965/2012:NCC.GEN.106 pt.
2.2.5.3 available means of any accident involving the aeroplane, (g);NCO.GEN.105 pt.
resulting in serious injury or death of any person or (h).For the definition of
substantial damage to the aeroplane or property. ‘serious injury:R.(EU)
Standard 996/2010:Art. 2 Def. (17)
Note.— A definition of the term “serious injury” is
contained in Annex 13.

Chapter 2
2.2.6 Cabin baggage (take-off and landing) R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.GEN.106 pt.
2.2.6 The pilot-in-command shall ensure that all baggage carried (a)(4);NCO.GEN.105 pt.
onto an aeroplane and taken into the passenger cabin is (a)(4)
securely stowed.
Standard

14-December-2020 Page 60 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
CHAPTER 2.3 AEROPLANE R.(EU) Different in Different in characterIn the
Reference 965/2012:NCC.POL.100 pt. character or EU system, the State of the
2.3.1.1 PERFORMANCE (a);NCO.POL.100 pt. (a).R. other means of Operator is the competent
OPERATING LIMITATIONS (EU) 2018/1139:Annex V: compliance authority for NCC operators
pt. 4.1, 4.3. and NCO operators
Standard operating aircraft registered
in a third country.
2.3.1 General

2.3.1.1 An aeroplane shall be operated:

a) in compliance with the terms of its airworthiness


certificate or equivalent approved document;

b) within the operating limitations prescribed by the


certificating authority of the State of Registry; and

c) if applicable, within the mass limitations imposed by


compliance with the applicable noise certification
Standards in Annex 16, Volume I, unless otherwise
authorized in exceptional circumstances for a certain
aerodrome or a runway where there is no noise
disturbance problem, by the competent authority of
the State in which the aerodrome is situated.
Chapter 2
2.3.1.2 Placards, listings, instrument markings, or R.(EU) No Difference
Reference combinations thereof, containing those operating limitations 965/2012:NCC.POL.100 pt.
2.3.1.2 prescribed by the certificating authority of the State of (b);NCO.POL.100 pt. (b).
Registry for visual presentation, shall be displayed in the
aeroplane.
Standard

14-December-2020 Page 61 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.3.1.3 The pilot-in-command shall determine that R.(EU) No Difference
Reference aeroplane performance will permit the take-off and departure 965/2012:NCC.POL.115;N
2.3.1.3 to be carried out safely. CO.POL.110.

Standard

Chapter 2
CHAPTER 2.4 AEROPLANE R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.100;
2.4.1 INSTRUMENTS, EQUIPMENT NCO.IDE.A.100
AND FLIGHT DOCUMENTS
Standard

Note.— Specifications for the provision of aeroplane


communication and navigation equipment are contained in
Chapter 2.5.

2.4.1 General

In addition to the minimum equipment necessary for the


issuance of a certificate of airworthiness, the instruments,
equipment and flight documents prescribed in the following
paragraphs shall be installed or carried, as appropriate, in
aeroplanes according to the aeroplane used and to the
circumstances under which the flight is to be conducted. The
prescribed instruments and equipment, including their
installation, shall be acceptable to the State of Registry.

14-December-2020 Page 62 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.4.2 Aeroplanes on all flights R. (EU) 2018/1139:Annex No Difference
Reference V Item 5.1.R.(EU)
2.4.2.1 2.4.2.1 An aeroplane shall be equipped with instruments 965/2012:NCC.POL.100;N
which will enable the flight crew to control the flight path of CC.IDE.A.100;NCO.IDE.A
the aeroplane, carry out any required procedural manoeuvres .100
Standard and observe the operating limitations of the aeroplane in the
expected operating conditions.

14-December-2020 Page 63 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.4.2.2 An aeroplane shall be equipped with or carry on R.(EU) Less protective Partially implemented.ELA1 For NCC operators in the
Reference board: 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.110; or partially aeroplanes, i.e. aeroplanes EU, the State of the
2.4.2.2 NCC.IDE.A.180;NCC.IDE. implemented or with a Maximum Take-off Operator is the
a) an accessible first-aid kit; A.190;NCC.IDE.A.205;NC not Mass (MTOM) of 1200 kg competent authority not
C.GEN.140;NCO.IDE.A;11 implemented or less that are not the State of Registry.The
Standard b) portable fire extinguishers of a type which, when 0;NCO.IDE.A.140;NCO.ID classified as complex State of the Operator also
discharged, will not cause dangerous contamination E.A.145;NCO.IDE.A.160; motor-powered aircraft, are issues the specific
of the air within the aeroplane. At least one shall be NCO.GEN.135. exempt from the hand fire approvals.
located in: extinguisher requirement in
NCO.IDE.A.160.
1) the pilot’s compartment; and

2) each passenger compartment that is separate


from the pilot’s compartment and that is not
readily accessible to the flight crew;

Note.— Refer to 2.4.2.3 for fire extinguishing


agents.

c) 1) a seat or berth for each person over an age to be


determined by the State of Registry; and

2) a seat belt for each seat and restraining belts for


each berth;

d) the following manuals, charts and information:

1) the flight manual or other documents or


information concerning any operating limitations
prescribed for the aeroplane by the certificating
authority of the State of Registry, required for
the application of Chapter 2.3;

2) any specific approval issued by the State of


Registry, if applicable, for the operation(s) to be
conducted;
3) current and suitable charts for the route of the

14-December-2020 Page 64 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

proposed flight and all routes along which it is


reasonable to expect that the flight may be
diverted;

4) procedures, as prescribed in Annex 2, for


pilots-in-command of intercepted aircraft;

5) visual signals for use by intercepting and


intercepted aircraft, as contained in Annex 2;
and

6) the journey log book for the aeroplane;

e) where the aeroplane is fitted with fuses that are


accessible in flight, spare electrical fuses of
appropriate ratings for replacement of those fuses.

14-December-2020 Page 65 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.4.2.3 Any agent used in a built-in fire extinguisher for Reg.(EU) Less protective Partially implemented. Only
Reference each lavatory disposal receptacle for towels, paper or waste in 2015/640:Part-26:26.170 or partially for Large Aeroplanes Initial
2.4.2.3 an aeroplane for which the individual certificate of and 26.400 implemented or CofA after 18 Feb 2020
airworthiness is first issued on or after 31 December 2011 and not (lavatory) and 18 May 2019
any extinguishing agent used in a portable fire extinguisher in implemented (portable).No reference for
Standard an aeroplane for which the individual certificate of Part-NCO, as it is very
airworthiness is first issued on or after 31 December 2018 unlikely that an NCO
shall: aircraft has a lavatory.

a) meet the applicable minimum performance


requirements of the State of Registry; and

b) not be of a type listed in the 1987 Montreal Protocol


on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer as it
appears in the Eighth Edition of the Handbook for
the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete
the Ozone Layer, Annex A, Group II.

Note.— Information concerning extinguishing agents is


contained in the UNEP Halons Technical Options Committee
Technical Note No. 1 — New Technology Halon Alternatives
and FAA Report No. DOT/FAA/AR-99-63, Options to the Use
of Halons for Aircraft Fire Suppression Systems.
Chapter 2
2.4.2.4 Recommendation.— Aeroplanes on all flights R.(EU) No Difference
Reference should be equipped with the ground-air signal codes for 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.230;
2.4.2.4 search and rescue purposes. NCO.IDE.A.180;AMC1
NCC.IDE.A.230(a)
(3);AMC1
Recommendation NCO.IDE.A.180

14-December-2020 Page 66 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.4.2.5 Recommendation.— Aeroplanes on all flights R.(EU) No Difference
Reference should be equipped with a safety harness for each flight crew 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.180
2.4.2.5 member seat. pt. (a)(4) and (a)
(5);NCO.IDE.A.140 pt. (a)
Note.—- Safety harness includes shoulder strap(s) and a (4)
Recommendation seat belt which may be used independently.

Chapter 2
2.4.2.6 Marking of break-in points R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.210;
2.4.2.6.1 2.4.2.6.1 If areas of the fuselage suitable for break-in by AMC1
rescue crews in emergency are marked on an aeroplane such NCC.IDE.A.210;NCO.IDE.
areas shall be marked as shown below (see figure following). A.165;AMC1
Standard The colour of the markings shall be red or yellow, and if NCO.IDE.A.165.
necessary they shall be outlined in white to contrast with the
background.
Chapter 2
2.4.2.6.2 If the corner markings are more than 2 m apart, R.(EU) No Difference
Reference intermediate lines 9 cm ´ 3 cm shall be inserted so that there is 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.210;
2.4.2.6.2 no more than 2 m between adjacent markings. AMC1
NCC.IDE.A.210;NCO.IDE.
Note.— This Standard does not require any aeroplane A.165; AMC1
Standard to have break-in areas. NCO.IDE.A.165

MARKING OF BREAK-IN POINTS (see 2.4.2.6)

14-December-2020 Page 67 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.4.3 All aeroplanes operated as VFR flights R.(EU) No Difference In the EU rules, point (c)
Reference 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.120 of the Standard is
2.4.3.1 2.4.3.1 All aeroplanes when operated as VFR flights pt. (a);NCO.IDE.A.120 pt. covered as additional
shall be: (a);For c): NCC.IDE.A.120 equipment for aeroplanes
pt. operated under visual
Standard a) equipped with a means of measuring and displaying: (b)&(c);NCO.IDE.A.120 meteorological
pt. (b)&(c) conditions (VMC) over
1) magnetic heading; water and out of sight of
the land, or under VMC
2) barometric altitude; at night, or in conditions
where the aeroplane
3) indicated airspeed; cannot be maintained in a
desired flight path
b) equipped with, or shall carry, a means of measuring without reference to one
and displaying time in hours, minutes and seconds; or more additional
and instruments, or when two
pilots are required for the
c) equipped with such additional equipment as may be operation.
prescribed by the appropriate authority.

14-December-2020 Page 68 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.4.3.2 Recommendation.— VFR flights which are R.(EU) Different in Other means of compliance. The EU rules do not
Reference operated as controlled flights should be equipped in 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.120 character or distinguish between VFR
2.4.3.2 accordance with 2.4.7. pt. (a), (b), (c).R.(EU) other means of flights and VFR
923/2012 compliance controlled flights. The
(SERA):SERA.5010 other means of
Recommendation compliance are ensured
through the provisions in
NCC.IDE.A.120(b) for
additional instruments
when in conditions
where the aeroplane
cannot be maintained in a
desired flight path
without reference to one
or more additional
instruments, as well as
the additional limitations
in Part-SERA 5010 for
VFR controlled flights.

14-December-2020 Page 69 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.4.4 Aeroplanes on flights over water R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.220
2.4.4.1 pt. (a); (c);NCO.IDE.A.175
2.4.4.1 Seaplanes pt. (a); (b).

Standard Seaplanes for all flights shall be equipped with:

a) one life jacket, or equivalent individual floatation


device, for each person on board, stowed in a
position readily accessible from the seat or berth;

b) equipment for making the sound signals prescribed


in the International Regulations for Preventing
Collisions at Sea, where applicable;

c) one anchor; and

d) one sea anchor (drogue), when necessary to assist in


manoeuvring.

Note.— “Seaplanes” includes amphibians operated as


seaplanes.

Chapter 2
2.4.4.2 Landplanes
Reference
2.4.4.2 Single-engined landplanes

Standard

14-December-2020 Page 70 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
Recommendation.— All single-engined landplanes: R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.220
2.4.4.2.1 a) when flying en route over water beyond gliding pt. (a) and
distance from the shore; or (b);NCO.IDE.A.175 pt. (a)

Recommendation b) when taking off or landing at an aerodrome where,


in the opinion of the pilot-in-command, the take-off
or approach path is so disposed over water that in
the event of a mishap there would be a likelihood of
a ditching;

should carry one life jacket or equivalent individual


floatation device for each person on board, stowed in a
position easily accessible from the seat or berth of the
person for whose use it is provided.

Note.— “Landplanes” includes amphibians operated as


landplanes.

Chapter 2
2.4.4.3 Aeroplanes on extended flights over water R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.220
2.4.4.3.1 2.4.4.3.1 All aeroplanes operated on extended flights pt. (a);NCO.IDE.A.175(a).
over water shall be equipped with, at a minimum, one life
jacket or equivalent individual floatation device for each
Standard person on board, stowed in a position easily accessible from
the seat or berth of the person for whose use it is provided.

14-December-2020 Page 71 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.4.4.3.2 The pilot-in-command of an aeroplane operated R.(EU) No Difference
Reference on an extended flight over water shall determine the risks to 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.220
2.4.4.3.2 survival of the occupants of the aeroplane in the event of a (d);AMC1
ditching. The pilot-in-command shall take into account the NCC.IDE.A.220;AMC2
operating environment and conditions such as, but not limited NCC.IDE.A.220 pt.
Standard to, sea state and sea and air temperatures, the distance from (a);NCO.IDE.A.175 pt. (a),
land suitable for making an emergency landing, and the (b), (c);AMC1
availability of search and rescue facilities. Based upon the NCO.IDE.A.175.
assessment of these risks, the pilot-in-command shall, in
addition to the equipment required in 2.4.4.3.1, ensure that the
aeroplane is equipped with:

a) life-saving rafts in sufficient numbers to carry all


persons on board, stowed so as to facilitate their
ready use in emergency, provided with such
life-saving equipment, including means of sustaining
life, as is appropriate to the flight to be undertaken;
and

b) equipment for making the distress signals described


in Annex 2.

Chapter 2
2.4.5 Aeroplanes on flights over designated land areas R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.230;
2.4.5 Aeroplanes, when operated across land areas which have NCO.IDE.A.180;AMC1
been designated by the State concerned as areas in which NCO.IDE.A.180;GM2
search and rescue would be especially difficult, shall be NCC.IDE.A.230;GM2
Standard equipped with such signalling devices and life-saving NCO.IDE.A.180.
equipment (including means of sustaining life) as may be
appropriate to the area overflown.

14-December-2020 Page 72 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.4.6 Aeroplanes on high altitude flights R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.195
2.4.6.1 2.4.6.1 Aeroplanes intended to be operated at high pt. (a), NCO.IDE.A.150 pt.
altitudes shall be equipped with oxygen storage and (a)
dispensing apparatus capable of storing and dispensing the
Standard oxygen supplies required in 2.2.3.8.

Chapter 2
2.4.6.2 Aeroplanes for which the individual certificate of R.(EU) No Difference
Reference airworthiness is 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.195
2.4.6.2 first issued on or after 1 January 1990 pt. (c)(1);NCO.IDE.A.150
pt. (c)
Pressurized aeroplanes intended to be operated at flight
Standard altitudes at which the atmospheric pressure is less than 376
hPa shall be equipped with a device to provide positive
warning to the flight crew of any dangerous loss of
pressurization.

Chapter 2
2.4.6.3 Aeroplanes for which the individual certificate of R.(EU) No Difference
Reference airworthiness was 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.195
2.4.6.3.1 first issued before 1 January 1990 pt. (c)(1);NCO.IDE.A.150
pt. (c)
Recommendation.— Pressurized aeroplanes intended to
Recommendation be operated at flight altitudes at which the atmospheric
pressure is less than 376 hPa should be equipped with a
device to provide positive warning to the flight crew of any
dangerous loss of pressurization.

14-December-2020 Page 73 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.4.7 All aeroplanes operated in accordance with R.(EU) No Difference
Reference the instrument flight rules 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.125
2.4.7 pt. (a), (b),
All aeroplanes when operated in accordance with the (c);NCO.IDE.A.125 pt. (a),
instrument flight rules, or when the aeroplane cannot be (b), (c).
Standard maintained in a desired attitude without reference to one or
more flight instruments, shall be:

a) equipped with a means of measuring and displaying:

1) magnetic heading (standby compass);

2) barometric altitude;

3) indicated airspeed, with a means of preventing


malfunctioning due to either condensation or
icing;

4) turn and slip;

5) aircraft attitude;

6) stabilized aircraft heading;

Note.— The requirements of 4), 5) and 6) may be


met by combinations of instruments or by integrated flight
director systems provided that the safeguards against total
failure, inherent in the three separate instruments, are
retained.

7) whether the supply of power to the gyroscopic


instruments is adequate;

8) the outside air temperature;

9) rate-of-climb and descent;

14-December-2020 Page 74 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

b) equipped with, or shall carry, a means of measuring


and displaying time in hours, minutes and seconds;
and

c) equipped with such additional instruments or


equipment as may be prescribed by the appropriate
authority.
Chapter 2
2.4.8 Aeroplanes when operated at night R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.115;
2.4.8 Aeroplanes, when operated at night, shall be equipped with: NCC.IDE.A.120 pt.
(b);NCO.IDE.A.115;NCO.I
a) the equipment specified in 2.4.7; and DE.A.120 pt. (b).
Standard
b) the lights required by Annex 2 for aircraft in flight or
operating on the movement area of an aerodrome;

Note.— Specifications for lights meeting the


requirements of Annex 2 for navigation lights are contained
in Appendix 2.1. The general characteristics of lights are
specified in Annex 8.

c) a landing light;

d) illumination for all flight instruments and equipment


that are essential for the safe operation of the
aeroplane that are used by the flight crew;

e) lights in all passenger compartments; and

f) an independent portable light for each crew member


station.

14-December-2020 Page 75 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.4.9 Aeroplanes complying with the R.(EU) No Difference
Reference noise certification Standards in Annex 16, Volume I 965/2012:NCC.GEN.140 pt.
2.4.9 (a)(4);NCO.GEN.135 pt.
An aeroplane shall carry a document attesting noise (a)(4).
certification.
Standard
Note.— The attestation may be contained in any
document, carried on board, approved by the State of
Registry.

Chapter 2
2.4.10 Mach number indicator R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.120
2.4.10 Aeroplanes with speed limitations expressed in terms of Mach (a)(6);NCC.IDE.A.125 (a)
number shall be equipped with a means of displaying Mach (10);NCO.IDE.A.120 (a)
number. (5);NCO.IDE.A.125 (a)
Standard (10).

Chapter 2
2.4.11 Aeroplanes required to be equipped with R.(EU) No Difference The term ‘terrain
Reference ground proximity warning systems (GPWS) 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.135; awareness warning
2.4.11.1 NCO.IDE.A.130 system’ (TAWS) is used
2.4.11.1 All turbine-engined aeroplanes of a maximum in the EU rules.
certificated take-off mass in excess of 5 700 kg or authorized to
Standard carry more than nine passengers shall be equipped with a
ground proximity warning system which has a
forward-looking terrain avoidance function.
Chapter 2
2.4.11.2 Recommendation.— All turbine-engined Less protective Not implemented. EASA
Reference aeroplanes of a maximum certificated take-off mass of 5 700 or partially SIB 2017-14 (Safety
2.4.11.2 kg or less and authorized to carry more than five but not implemented or Information Bulletin)
more than nine passengers should be equipped with a not recommends the
ground proximity warning system which has a implemented installation of TAWS for
Recommendation forward-looking terrain avoidance function. light aeroplanes not
engaged in Commercial
Air Transport.

14-December-2020 Page 76 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.4.11.3 Recommendation.— All piston-engined Less protective Not implemented. EASA
Reference aeroplanes of a maximum certificated take-off mass in excess or partially SIB 2017-14 (Safety
2.4.11.3 of 5 700 kg or authorized to carry more than nine implemented or Information Bulletin)
passengers should be equipped with a ground proximity not recommends the
warning system which has a forward-looking terrain implemented installation of TAWS for
Recommendation avoidance function. light aeroplanes not
engaged in Commercial
Air Transport.
Chapter 2
2.4.11.4 A ground proximity warning system shall R.(EU) No Difference Specifications are given
Reference provide automatically a timely and distinctive warning to the 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.135; in the applicable ETSO
2.4.11.4 flight crew when the aeroplane is in potentially hazardous NCO.IDE.A.130.Reg.(EU) (European Technical
proximity to the earth’s surface. 748/2012:21.A.101;21.B.80 Standard Orders)
;CSETSO: ETSO-C151a; referenced in GM1
Standard APPENDIX 1: 1.3 (e) (f) NCC.IDE.A135 and GM1
NCO.IDE.A.130.
Chapter 2
2.4.11.5 A ground proximity warning system shall R.(EU) No Difference
Reference provide, at a minimum, warnings of at least the following 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.135;
2.4.11.5 circumstances: NCO.IDE.A.130;AMC1
NCC.IDE.A.135;AMC1
a) excessive descent rate; NCO.IDE.A.130.Reg.(EU)
Standard 748/2012:21.A.101;21.B.80
b) excessive altitude loss after take-off or go-around; ;CSETSO: ETSO-C151a;
and APPENDIX 1: 1.3 (e) (f)

c) unsafe terrain clearance.

14-December-2020 Page 77 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.4.11.6 Recommendation.— A ground proximity R.(EU) No Difference
Reference warning system should provide, as a minimum, warnings of 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.135;
2.4.11.6 at least the following circumstances: NCO.IDE.A.130-GM1
NCC.IDE.A.135;GM1
a) excessive descent rate; NCO.IDE.A.130.Reg.(EU)
Recommendation 748/2012:21.A.101;21.B.80
b) excessive terrain closure rate; ;CSETSO: ETSO-C151a;
APPENDIX 1: 1.3 (e) (f)
c) excessive altitude loss after take-off or go-around;

d) unsafe terrain clearance while not in landing


configuration;

1) gear not locked down;

2) flaps not in a landing position; and

e) excessive descent below the instrument glide path.

14-December-2020 Page 78 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.4.11.7 A ground proximity warning system installed in R.(EU) No Difference
Reference turbine-engined aeroplanes of a maximum certificated take-off 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.135;
2.4.11.7 mass in excess of 5 700 kg or authorized to carry more than NCO.IDE.A.130;GM1
nine passengers for which the individual certificate of NCC.IDE.A.135;GM1
airworthiness was first issued after 1 January 2011 shall NCO.IDE.A.130.Reg.(EU)
Standard provide, as a minimum, warnings of at least the following 748/2012:21.A.101;21.B.80
circumstances: ;CSETSO: ETSO-C151a;
APPENDIX 1: 1.3 (e) (f)
a) excessive descent rate;

b) excessive terrain closure rate;

c) excessive altitude loss after take-off or go-around;

d) unsafe terrain clearance while not in landing


configuration;

1) gear not locked down;

2) flaps not in a landing position; and

e) excessive descent below the instrument glide path.

Chapter 2
2.4.12 Emergency locator transmitter (ELT) R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.215
2.4.12.1 2.4.12.1 Recommendation.— All aeroplanes should pt. (a);NCO.IDE.A.170 pt.
carry an automatic ELT. (a)

Recommendation

14-December-2020 Page 79 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.4.12.2 Except as provided for in 2.4.12.3, all aeroplanes R.(EU) No Difference
Reference shall be equipped with at least one ELT of any type. 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.215
2.4.12.2 pt. (a)(1);NCO.IDE.A.170
pt. (a)(1)

Standard

Chapter 2
2.4.12.3 All aeroplanes for which the individual R.(EU) Less protective Partially
Reference certificate of airworthiness is first issued after 1 July 2008 shall 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.215 or partially implementedNCO.IDE.A.170
2.4.12.3 be equipped with at least one automatic ELT. pt. (a)(2);NCO.IDE.A.170 implemented or (a) (3): a survival ELT
(a)(2) not (ELT(S)) or a personal
implemented locator beacon (PLB),
Standard carried by a crew member or
a passenger, is authorised
when certified for a
maximum passenger seating
configuration of six or less.
Chapter 2
2.4.12.4 ELT equipment carried to satisfy the R.(EU) No Difference
Reference requirements of 2.4.12.1, 2.4.12.2 and 2.4.12.3 shall operate in 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.251
2.4.12.4 accordance with the relevant provisions of Annex 10, Volume pt. (c);NCO.IDE.A.170 pt.
III. (c);AMC2 NCC.IDE.A.215
(c);AMC2
Standard Note.— The judicious choice of numbers of ELTs, their NCO.IDE.A.170 (c)
type and placement on aircraft, and associated floatable
life-support systems, will ensure the greatest chance of ELT
activation in the event of an accident for aircraft operating
over water or land, including areas especially difficult for
search and rescue. Placement of transmitter units is a vital
factor in ensuring optimal crash and fire protection. The
placement of the control and switching devices (activation
monitors) of automatic fixed ELTs and their associated
operational procedures will also take into consideration the
need for rapid detection of inadvertent activation and
convenient manual switching by crew members.

14-December-2020 Page 80 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.4.13 Aeroplanes required to be equipped with R.(EU) No Difference
Reference a pressure-altitude reporting transponder 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.255
2.4.13.1 AMC1 NCC.IDE.A.255
2.4.13.1 Aeroplanes shall be equipped with a (b);NCO.IDE.A.200;AMC
pressure-altitude reporting transponder which operates in 1 NCO.IDE.A.200 (b)
Standard accordance with the relevant provisions of Annex 10, Volume
IV.
Chapter 2
2.4.13.2 Unless exempted by the appropriate authorities, R.(EU) No Difference
Reference aeroplanes operating as VFR flights shall be equipped with a 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.255
2.4.13.2 pressure-altitude reporting transponder which operates in AMC1 NCC.IDE.A.255 (a)
accordance with the relevant provision of Annex 10, Volume (b);NCO.IDE.A.200;
IV. AMC1 NCO.IDE.A.200 (a)
Standard (b)
Note.— These provisions are intended to support the
effectiveness of ACAS as well as to improve the effectiveness
of air traffic services.

Chapter 2
2.4.14 Microphones R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.OP.160 pt.
2.4.14.1 Recommendation.— When operating under the (a);NCC.IDE.A.155
instrument flight rules all flight crew members required to be
on flight deck duty should communicate through boom or
Recommendation throat microphones below the transition level/altitude.

14-December-2020 Page 81 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.4.15 Aeroplanes equipped with automatic landing R.(EU) Less protective Partially implemented.Reg. EVS and HUD are
Reference systems, a head-up display (HUD) 965/2012:SPA.LVO.100;SP or partially (EU) 965/2012 does not addressed in SPA.LVO.
2.4.15.1 or equivalent displays, enhanced vision systems (EVS), A.LVO.110;NCC.OP.110;N implemented or contain rules for SVS and SVS and CVS will be
synthetic vision systems (SVS) and/or combined vision CO.OP.110;AMC5 not CVS. addressed with
systems (CVS) NCC.OP.110 pt. (d), implemented RMT.0379. For
Standard (h);GM4 NCO.OP.110 pt. singlepilot operations,
2.4.15.1 Where aeroplanes are equipped with automatic (d), (h). the minimum RVR/VIS
landing systems, a HUD or equivalent displays, EVS, SVS or should be calculated in
CVS, or any combination of those systems into a hybrid accordance with the
system, criteria for the use of such systems for the safe following additional
operation of an aeroplane shall be established by the State of criteria: (…) (ii) an
Registry. approved HUDLS,
including, where
Note.— Information regarding a HUD or equivalent appropriate, enhanced
displays, including references to RTCA and EUROCAE vision system (EVS), or
documents, is contained in the Manual of All-Weather equivalent approved
Operations (Doc 9365). system.Moreover, in the
EU system, for NCC
operators, it is the State
of the Operator that has
this responsibility, not
the State of Registry.

14-December-2020 Page 82 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.4.15.2 In establishing operational criteria for the use of R.(EU) Less protective Partially implemented.CVS Reg.(EU) 965/2012
Reference automatic landing systems, a HUD or equivalent displays, 965/2012:SPA.LVO;NCC.O or partially does not receive currently allows
2.4.15.2 EVS, SVS or CVS, the State of Registry shall ensure that: P.110;NCO.OP.110;AMC5 implemented or operational credits. operational credits only
NCC.OP.110 (d), (h);GM4 not for HUDs and EVS.SVS
a) the equipment meets the appropriate airworthiness NCO.OP.110 (d), (h). implemented and CVS will be
Standard certification requirements; addressed with
RMT.0379. For
b) the operator/owner has carried out a safety risk singlepilot operations,
assessment associated with the operations the minimum RVR/VIS
supported by the automatic landing systems, a HUD should be calculated in
or equivalent displays, EVS, SVS or CVS; accordance with the
following additional
c) the operator/owner has established and documented criteria: (…) (ii) an
the procedures for the use of, and training approved HUDLS,
requirements for, automatic landing systems, a HUD including, where
or equivalent displays, EVS, SVS or CVS. appropriate, enhanced
vision system (EVS), or
Note 1.— Guidance on safety risk assessments is equivalent approved
contained in the Safety Management Manual (SMM) (Doc system.Moreover, in the
9859). EU system, for NCC
operators, it is the State
Note 2.— Guidance on establishing operational criteria of the Operator that has
is contained in Attachment 2.B. this responsibility, not
the State of Registry.

14-December-2020 Page 83 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.4.16 Flight recorders
Reference
2.4.16 Note 1.— Crash-protected flight recorders comprise one
or more of the following:

Note — a flight data recorder (FDR),


— a cockpit voice recorder (CVR),
— an airborne image recorder (AIR),
— a data link recorder (DLR).

As per Appendix 2.3, image and data link information may


be recorded on either the CVR or the FDR.

Note 2.— Lightweight flight recorders comprise one or


more of the following:

— an aircraft data recording system (ADRS),


— a cockpit audio recording system (CARS),
— an airborne image recording system (AIRS),
— a data link recording system (DLRS).

As per Appendix 2.3, image and data link information may


be recorded on either the CARS or the ADRS.

Note 3.— Detailed requirements on flight recorders are


contained in Appendix 2.3.

Note 4.— For aeroplanes for which the application for


type certification is submitted to a Contracting State before
1 January 2016, specifications applicable to
crash-protected flight recorders may be found in EUROCAE
ED-112, ED-56A, ED-55, Minimum Operational Performance
Specifications (MOPS), or earlier equivalent documents.

Note 5.— For aeroplanes for which the application for


type certification is submitted to a Contracting State on or
after 1 January 2016, specifications applicable to

14-December-2020 Page 84 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

crash-protected flight recorders may be found in EUROCAE


ED-112A, Minimum Operational Performance Specification
(MOPS), or equivalent documents.

Note 6.— Specifications applicable to lightweight flight


recorders may be found in EUROCAE ED-155, Minimum
Operational Performance Specification (MOPS), or
equivalent documents.

Note 7.— As of 7 November 2019, Section 3, Chapter


3.3, contains requirements for States regarding the use of
voice, image and/or data recordings and transcripts.

14-December-2020 Page 85 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.4.16.1 Flight data recorders and aircraft data recording R.(EU) Less protective Partially
Reference systems 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.160 or partially implemented.2.4.16.1.1:
2.4.16.1.1.1 NCC.IDE.A.165;NCC.IDE. implemented or There is no flight
Note.— Parameters to be recorded are listed in Tables A.170;AMC1 not recorder carriage
A2.3-1 and A2.3-3 of Appendix 2.3. NCC.IDE.A.160 for the implemented requirement in Part-NCO.
Recommendation CVR;AMC1&AMC2 Notes 1 and 2:R.(EU)
NCC.IDE.A.165 for the 965/2012:Annex I
2.4.16.1.1 Applicability FDR;AMC1 Definitions (49c);GM19
NCC.IDE.A.170 for the to Annex I for the
2.4.16.1.1.1 Recommendation.— All turbine-engined DLR; different categories of
aeroplanes with a seating configuration of more than five flight recorders.Notes 4
passenger seats and a maximum certificated take-off mass of and 5:R.(EU)
5 700 kg or less for which the individual certificate of 965/2012:AMC1
airworthiness is first issued on or after 1 January 2016 NCC.IDE.A.160 for the
should be equipped with: CVR;AMC1&AMC2
NCC.IDE.A.165 for the
a) an FDR which should record at least the first 16 FDR;AMC1
parameters in Table A2.3-1 of Appendix 2.3; or NCC.IDE.A.170 for the
DLR.Note 6: AMC1
b) a Class C AIR or AIRS which should record at least CAT.IDE.A.191 for
the flight path and speed parameters displayed to reference to ED-155Note
the pilot(s), as defined in 2.2.2 of Appendix 2.3; or 7: Point (f) of
NCC.GEN.145 addresses
c) an ADRS which should record at least the first 7 the protection of
parameters listed in Table A2.3-3 of Appendix 2.3. recordings of flight
recorders.
Note 1.— AIR or AIRS classification is defined in 4.1 of
Appendix 2.3.

Note 2.— “The application for type certification that is


submitted to a Contracting State” refers to the date of
application of the original “Type Certificate” for the
aeroplane type, not the date of certification of particular
aeroplane variants or derivative models.

14-December-2020 Page 86 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.4.16.1.1.2 All aeroplanes of a maximum certificated R.(EU) More Exacting NCC.IDE.A.165 is 2.4.16.1.1.2 only requires
Reference take-off mass of over 5 700 kg for which the application for 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.165 or Exceeds applicable to aeroplanes a FDR for aeroplanes
2.4.16.1.1.2 type certification is submitted to a Contracting State on or for the carriage with Cof A issued on or with MCTOM>5700 kg,
after 1 January 2023 shall be equipped with an FDR capable of requirement;AMC2 after 1 January 2016. which are NCC
recording at least the 82 parameters listed in Table A2.3-1 of NCC.IDE.A.165 for the list aeroplanes, not NCO
Standard Appendix 2.3. of flight parameters aeroplanes.

Chapter 2
2.4.16.1.1.3 Recommendation.— All aeroplanes of a R.(EU) More Exacting NCC.IDE.A.165 is
Reference maximum certificated take-off mass of over 5 700 kg for 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.165 or Exceeds applicable to aeroplanes
2.4.16.1.1.3 which the individual certificate of airworthiness is first for the carriage with CofA issued on or
issued on or after 1 January 2023 should be equipped with requirement;AMC2 after 1 January 2016.
an FDR capable of recording at least the 82 parameters NCC.IDE.A.165 for the list
Recommendation listed in Table A2.3-1 of Appendix 2.3. of flight parameters

Chapter 2
2.4.16.1.2 Recording technology Less protective Not implemented FDR is All models of recorders
Reference or partially required by 2.4.16.1.1.2 for produced since 2016 are
2.4.16.1.2 FDRs, ADRS, AIRs or AIRS shall not use engraving metal foil, implemented or large aeroplanes for which solid-state, therefore
frequency modulation (FM), photographic film or magnetic not application for TC is after there is no need to forbid
tape. implemented 2023. FDR, ADRS, AIR or the old recording
Standard AIRS is recommended by technologies (metal foil,
2.4.16.1.1 for light frequency modulation,
aeroplanes first issued with photographic film or
an individual CofA on or magnetic tape). See also
after 1 January 2016. NPA 201326, RIA A.
Chapter 2
2.4.16.1.3 Duration R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.165
2.4.16.1.3 All FDRs shall retain the information recorded during at least pt. (b)
the last 25 hours of their operation.

Standard

14-December-2020 Page 87 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.4.16.2 Cockpit voice recorders and cockpit audio recording Less protective Not implemented.There is
Reference systems or partially no flight recorder
2.4.16.2.1 implemented or carriage requirement in
not Part-NCO.
2.4.16.2.1 Applicability implemented
Recommendation
Recommendation.— All turbine-engined aeroplanes
with a seating configuration of more than five passenger
seats and a maximum certificated take-off mass of 5 700 kg
or less for which the individual certificate of airworthiness is
first issued on or after 1 January 2016 and required to be
operated by more than one pilot should be equipped with
either a CVR or a CARS.
Chapter 2
2.4.16.2.2 Recording technology Less protective Not implemented.2.4.16.2.1 See also NPA 201326,
Reference or partially is only applicable to RIA A.
2.4.16.2.2 CVRs and CARS shall not use magnetic tape or wire. implemented or aeroplanes first issued with
not an individual CofA on or
implemented after 1 Jan 2016, and all
Standard modern models of CVR are
solid-state. Therefore, there
is no need to forbid the old
recording technologies.
Chapter 2
2.4.16.2.3 Duration R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.160
2.4.16.2.3 pt. (b)

Standard

14-December-2020 Page 88 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.4.16.2.3.1 All CVRs shall retain the information R.(EU) No Difference
Reference recorded during at least the last 2 hours of their operation. 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.160
2.4.16.2.3.1 pt. (b)

Standard

Chapter 2
2.4.16.2.3.2 All aeroplanes that are required to be
Reference equipped with CARS, and for which the individual certificate
2.4.16.2.3.2 of airworthiness is first issued on or after 1 January 2025, shall
be equipped with a CARS which shall retain the information
recorded during at least the last two hours of their operation.
Standard

Chapter 2
2.4.16.3 Data link recorders R.(EU) Less protective 2.4.16.2 does not contain
Reference 2.4.16.3.1 Applicability 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.170 or partially any Standard that
2.4.16.3.1.1 pt. (a);AMC1 implemented or requires the carriage of a
2.4.16.3.1.1 All aeroplanes for which the individual NCC.IDE.A.170 pt. (a) not CVR, so 2.4.16.3.1.1 has
certificate of airworthiness is first issued on or after 1 January implemented no applicability.
Standard 2016, which use any of the data link communications
applications referred to in 5.1.2 of Appendix 2.3 and are
required to carry a CVR, shall record the data link
communications messages on a crash-protected flight
recorder.

14-December-2020 Page 89 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.4.16.3.1.2 All aeroplanes for which the individual R.(EU) No Difference 2.4.16.2 does not contain
Reference certificate of airworthiness was first issued before 1 January 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.170 any standard that
2.4.16.3.1.2 2016, that are required to carry a CVR and are modified on or requires the carriage of a
after 1 January 2016 to install and use any of the data link CVR, so 2.4.16.3.1.2 has
communications applications referred to in 5.1.2 of Appendix no applicability.
Standard 2.3, shall record the data link communications messages on a
crash-protected flight recorder, unless the installed data link
communications equipment is compliant with a type certificate
issued or aircraft modification first approved prior to 1
January 2016.

Note 1.— Refer to Table 3.C-4 in Attachment 3.C for


examples of data link communication recording
requirements.

Note 2.— A Class B AIR could be a means for recording


data link communications applications messages to and
from the aeroplanes where it is not practical or is
prohibitively expensive to record those data link
communications applications messages on FDR or CVR.

Note 3.— The “aircraft modifications” refer to


modifications to install the data link communications
equipment on the aircraft (e.g. structural, wiring).
Chapter 2
2.4.16.3.1.3 Recommendation.— All aeroplanes for
Reference which the individual certificate of airworthiness was first
2.4.16.3.1.3 issued before 1 January 2016, that are required to carry a
CVR and are modified on or after 1 January 2016 to use any
of the data link communications applications referred to in
Recommendation 5.1.2 of Appendix 2.3 should record the data link
communications messages on a crash-protected flight
recorder.

14-December-2020 Page 90 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.4.16.3.2 Duration R.(EU) No Difference 2.4.16.2 does not contain
Reference 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.170 any standard that
2.4.16.3.2 The minimum recording duration shall be equal to the duration pt. (c) requires the carriage of a
of the CVR. CVR, so 2.4.16.3.1.2 has
no applicability.
Standard

Chapter 2
2.4.16.3.3 Correlation R.(EU) Different in NCC.IDE.A.170 pt. (a)(3) It is required to record
Reference 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.170 character or requires recording ‘information on the time
2.4.16.3.3 Data link recording shall be able to be correlated to the pt. (a)(3) other means of ‘information on the time and and priority of data link
recorded cockpit audio. compliance priority of data link messages’. This is
messages’ considered sufficient to
Standard correlate with the CVR
recording.2.4.16.2 does
not contain any standard
that requires the carriage
of a CVR, so 2.4.16.3.3
has no applicability.
Chapter 2
2.4.16.4 Flight recorders — general R.(EU) 748/2012:Annex I No Difference For installation design
Reference (Part 21):21.A.101; requirements, refer to
2.4.16.4.1 21.A.605; applicable certification
2.4.16.4.1 Construction and installation 21.B.70;21.B.80;CS25:CS specifications (CS-25 and
25.1457 for CVR; CS CS-23). For equipment
Standard Flight recorders shall be constructed, located and installed so 25.1459 for FDR.CS-23:CS design requirements,
as to provide maximum practical protection for the recordings 23.2555 for FDR and refer to applicable ETSOs
in order that the recorded information may be preserved, CVRETSOs:C123 (CVR), (C123 for CVR, C124 for
recovered and transcribed. Flight recorders shall meet the C124 (FDR), C176 (AIR), FDR, C176 for AIR ,C177
prescribed crashworthiness and fire protection specifications. C177 (DLR), 2C197 for DLR, 2C197 for ADRS
(lightweight flight and CARS)
recorders).

14-December-2020 Page 91 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.4.16.4.2 Operation R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.GEN.106 pt.
2.4.16.4.2.1 2.4.16.4.2.1 Flight recorders shall not be switched off (a)(9)(i)
during flight time.

Standard

Chapter 2
2.4.16.4.2.2 To preserve flight recorder records, flight R.(EU) No Difference
Reference recorders shall be deactivated upon completion of flight time 965/2012:NCC.GEN.106 pt.
2.4.16.4.2.2 following an accident or incident. The flight recorders shall (a)(9)(iii)
not be reactivated before their disposition as determined in
accordance with Annex 13.
Standard
Note 1.— The need for removal of the flight recorder
records from the aircraft will be determined by the
investigation authority in the State conducting the
investigation with due regard to the seriousness of an
occurrence and the circumstances, including the impact on
the operation.

Note 2.— The pilot-in-command’s responsibilities


regarding the retention of flight recorder records are
contained in 2.4.16.4.3.

Chapter 2
2.4.16.4.3 Flight recorder records R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.GEN.106 pt.
2.4.16.4.3 The pilot-in-command, and/or the owner/operator, shall (a)(9) for the
ensure, to the extent possible, in the event the aeroplane pilot-in-command and
becomes involved in an accident or incident, the preservation NCC.GEN.145 pt. (a) for
Standard of all related flight recorder records, and if necessary the the operator
associated flight recorders, and their retention in safe custody
pending their disposition as determined in accordance with
Annex 13.

14-December-2020 Page 92 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.4.16.4.4 Continued serviceability R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.GEN.145 pt.
2.4.16.4.4 Operational checks and evaluations of recordings from the (b)
flight recorder systems shall be conducted to ensure the
continued serviceability of the recorders.
Standard
Note.— Procedures for the inspections of the flight
recorder systems are given in Appendix 2.3.

Chapter 2
2.4.16.4.5 Flight recorder electronic documentation R.(EU) Less protective Not implemented. It is
Reference 965/2012:NCC.GEN.145 pt. or partially not required that the FDR
2.4.16.4.5 Recommendation.— The documentation requirement (d) implemented or documentation is in
concerning FDR and ADRS parameters provided by not electronic format.
operators to accident investigation authorities should be in implemented
Recommendation electronic format and take account of industry
specifications.

Note.— Industry specifications for documentation


concerning flight recorder parameters may be found in
ARINC 647A, Flight Recorder Electronic Documentation, or
equivalent document.

Chapter 2
2.4.17 Electronic flight bags (EFBs)
Reference
2.4.17 Note.— Guidance on EFB equipment, functions and
specific approval is contained in the Manual on Electronic
Flight Bags (EFBs) (Doc 10020).
Note

14-December-2020 Page 93 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.4.17.1 EFB equipment R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.GEN.130;N
2.4.17.1 Where portable EFBs are used on board an aeroplane, the CC.GEN.131 pt. (a);AMC1
pilot-in-command and/or the operator/owner shall ensure that NCC.GEN.131(a);NCO.GE
they do not affect the performance of the aeroplane systems, N.125;AMC1
Standard equipment or the ability to operate the aeroplane. NCO.GEN.125.

Chapter 2
2.4.17.2 EFB functions R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.GEN.131A
2.4.17.2.1 2.4.17.2.1 Where EFBs are used on board an aeroplane MCs to
the pilot-in-command and/or the owner/operator shall: NCC.GEN.131NCO.GEN.1
25;AMCs to
Standard a) assess the safety risk(s) associated with each EFB NCO.GEN.125NCC.POL.1
function; 10 pt. (b);AMC2
NCC.POL.110(b)
b) establish the procedures for the use of, and training
requirements for, the device and each EFB function;
and

c) ensure that, in the event of an EFB failure, sufficient


information is readily available to the flight crew for
the flight to be conducted safely.

Note.— Guidance on safety risk assessments is


contained in the Safety Management Manual (SMM) (Doc
9859).
Chapter 2
2.4.17.2.2 The State of Registry shall issue a specific R.(EU) Less protective Different in character.For
Reference approval for the operational use of EFB functions to be used 965/2012:NCC.GEN.131;N or partially NCC operators and for NCO
2.4.17.2.2 for the safe operation of aeroplanes. CO.GEN.125;AMCs to implemented or operators using
NCC.GEN.131;AMCs to not third-country registered
NCO.GEN.125 implemented aircraft, the State of
Standard Operator shall establish
those criteria.

14-December-2020 Page 94 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.4.17.3 EFB specific approval R.(EU) Less protective Different in character.For
Reference 965/2012:NCC.GEN.131;N or partially NCC operators and for NCO
2.4.17.3 When issuing a specific approval for the use of EFBs, the CO.GEN.125;AMCs to implemented or operators using
State of Registry shall ensure that: NCC.GEN.131;AMCs to not third-country registered
NCO.GEN.125 implemented aircraft, the State of
Standard a) the EFB equipment and its associated installation Operator shall establish
hardware, including interaction with aeroplane those criteria.
systems if applicable, meet the appropriate
airworthiness certification requirements;

b) the operator/owner has assessed the risks


associated with the operations supported by the EFB
function(s);

c) the operator/owner has established requirements for


redundancy of the information (if appropriate)
contained in and displayed by the EFB function(s);

d) the operator/owner has established and documented


procedures for the management of the EFB
function(s) including any databases it may use; and

e) the operator/owner has established and documented


the procedures for the use of, and training
requirements for, the EFB function(s).

Note.— Guidance on safety risk assessments is


contained in the Safety Management Manual (SMM) (Doc
9859).

14-December-2020 Page 95 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.4.18 Aeroplane operated under an Article 83 bis
Reference agreement
2.4.18.1
Note.— Guidance concerning the transfer of
responsibilities by the State of Registry to the State of the
Standard principal location of a general aviation operator in
accordance with Article 83 bis is contained in the Manual
on the Implementation of Article 83 bis of the Convention on
International Civil Aviation (Doc 10059).

2.4.18.1 An aeroplane, when operating under an Article


83 bis agreement entered into between the State of Registry
and the State of the principal location of a general aviation
operator, shall carry a certified true copy of the agreement
summary, in either an electronic or hard copy format. When
the summary is issued in a language other than English, an
English translation shall be included.

Note.— Guidance regarding the agreement summary is


contained in Doc 10059.
Chapter 2
2.4.18.2 The agreement summary of an Article 83 bis
Reference agreement shall be accessible to a civil aviation safety
2.4.18.2 inspector to determine which functions and duties are
transferred under the agreement by the State of Registry to
the State of the principal location of a general aviation
Standard operator, when conducting surveillance activities such as
ramp checks.

Note.— Guidance for the civil aviation safety inspector


conducting an inspection of an aeroplane operated under
an Article 83 bis agreement is contained in the Manual of
Procedures for Operations Inspection, Certification and
Continued Surveillance (Doc 8335).

14-December-2020 Page 96 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.4.18.3 The agreement summary shall be transmitted to
Reference ICAO together with the Article 83 bis agreement for
2.4.18.3 registration with the ICAO Council by the State of Registry or
the State of the principal location of a general aviation
operator.
Standard
Note.— The agreement summary transmitted with the
Article 83 bis agreement registered with the ICAO Council
contains the list of all aircraft affected by the agreement.
However, the certified true copy to be carried on board, as
per 2.4.18.1, will need to list only the specific aircraft
carrying the copy.
Chapter 2
2.4.18.4 Recommendation.—The agreement summary
Reference should contain the information in Appendix 2.5 for the
2.4.18.4 specific aircraft and should follow the layout of Appendix
2.5, paragraph 2.

Recommendation

14-December-2020 Page 97 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
CHAPTER 2.5 AEROPLANE R. (EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCO.IDE.A.190
2.5.1.1 COMMUNICATION, pt. (a);NCC.IDE.A.245 pt.
NAVIGATION AND SURVEILLANCE (a)

Standard EQUIPMENT

2.5.1 Communication equipment

2.5.1.1 An aeroplane to be operated in accordance with


the instrument flight rules or at night shall be provided with
radio communication equipment. Such equipment shall be
capable of conducting two-way communication with those
aeronautical stations and on those frequencies prescribed by
the appropriate authority.

Note.— The requirements of 2.5.1.1 are considered


fulfilled if the ability to conduct the communications
specified therein is established during radio propagation
conditions which are normal for the route.
Chapter 2
2.5.1.2 When compliance with 2.5.1.1 requires that more R. (EU) No Difference
Reference than one communication equipment unit be provided, each 965/2012:NCO.IDE.A.190
2.5.1.2 shall be independent of the other or others to the extent that a pt. (c);NCC.IDE.A.245 pt.
failure in any one will not result in failure of any other. (b)

Standard

Chapter 2
2.5.1.3 An aeroplane to be operated in accordance with R.(EU) No Difference
Reference VFR, but as a controlled flight, shall, unless exempted by the 965/2012:NCO.IDE.A.190
2.5.1.3 appropriate authority, be provided with radio communication pt. (a);NCC.IDE.A.245 pt.
equipment capable of conducting two-way communication at (a)
any time during flight with such aeronautical stations and on
Standard such frequencies as may be prescribed by the appropriate
authority.

14-December-2020 Page 98 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.5.1.4 An aeroplane to be operated on a flight to which R.(EU) No Difference
Reference the provisions of 2.4.4.3.1 or 2.4.5 apply shall, unless 965/2012:NCO.IDE.A.190
2.5.1.4 exempted by the appropriate authority, be provided with radio pt. (a);NCC.IDE.A.245 pt.
communication equipment capable of conducting two-way (a)
communication at any time during flight with such
Standard aeronautical stations and on such frequencies as may be
prescribed by the appropriate authority.
Chapter 2
2.5.1.5 The radio communication equipment required in R.(EU) No Difference
Reference accordance with 2.5.1.1 to 2.5.1.4 shall provide for 965/2012:NCO.IDE.A.190
2.5.1.5 communication on the aeronautical emergency frequency pt. (b);NCC.IDE.A.245 pt.
121.5 MHz. (a)(4)

Standard

14-December-2020 Page 99 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.5.1.6 For operations where communication equipment R.(EU) No Difference Not applicable to NCO
Reference is required to meet an RCP specification for 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.245; because such operations
2.5.1.6 performance-based communication (PBC), an aeroplane shall, NCC.IDE.A.250; AMC1 are not performed with
in addition to the requirements specified in 2.5.1.1 to 2.5.1.5: NCC.IDE.A.245&250. aircraft used for NCO.

Standard a) be provided with communication equipment which


will enable it to operate in accordance with the
prescribed RCP specification(s);

b) have information relevant to the aeroplane RCP


specification capabilities listed in the flight manual or
other aeroplane documentation approved by the
State of Design or State of Registry; and

c) where the aeroplane is operated in accordance with a


MEL, have information relevant to the aeroplane RCP
specification capabilities included in the MEL.

Note.— Information on the performance-based


communication and surveillance (PBCS) concept and
guidance material on its implementation are contained in
the Performance-based Communication and Surveillance
(PBCS) Manual (Doc 9869).
Chapter 2
2.5.1.7 The State of Registry shall establish criteria for R.(EU) Less protective Different in character For Not applicable to NCO
Reference operations where an RCP specification for PBC has been 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.245; or partially operators using because such operations
2.5.1.7 prescribed. NCC.IDE.A.250; AMC1 implemented or third-country registered are not performed with
NCC.IDE.A.245&250. not aircraft, the State of aircraft used for NCO.
implemented Operator shall establish
Standard those criteria.

14-December-2020 Page 100 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.5.1.8 In establishing criteria for operations where an R.(EU) Less protective Different in character For Not applicable to NCO
Reference RCP specification for PBC has been prescribed, the State of 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.245; or partially operators using because such operations
2.5.1.8 Registry shall require that the operator/owner establish: NCC.IDE.A.250; AMC1 implemented or third-country registered are not performed with
NCC.IDE.A.245&250. not aircraft, the State of aircraft used for NCO.
a) normal and abnormal procedures, including implemented Operator shall establish
Standard contingency procedures; those criteria.

b) flight crew qualification and proficiency


requirements, in accordance with the appropriate
RCP specifications;

c) a training programme for relevant personnel


consistent with the intended operations; and

d) appropriate maintenance procedures to ensure


continued airworthiness, in accordance with
appropriate RCP specifications.
Chapter 2
2.5.1.9 The State of Registry shall ensure that, in respect R.(EU) Less protective Different in characterFor Not applicable to NCO
Reference of those aeroplanes mentioned in 2.5.1.6, adequate provisions 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.245; or partially operators using because such operations
2.5.1.9 exist for: NCC.IDE.A.250; AMC1 implemented or third-country registered are not performed with
NCC.IDE.A.245&250. not aircraft, the State of aircraft used for NCO.
a) receiving the reports of observed communication implemented Operator shall establish
Standard performance issued by monitoring programmes those criteria
established in accordance with Annex 11, Chapter 3,
3.3.5.2; and

b) taking immediate corrective action for individual


aircraft, aircraft types or operators, identified in such
reports as not complying with the RCP
specification(s).

14-December-2020 Page 101 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.5.2 Navigation equipment R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.250
2.5.2.1 2.5.2.1 An aeroplane shall be provided with navigation pt.
equipment which will enable it to proceed: (a);NCO.IDE.A.195;AMC
1 NCO.IDE.A.195
Standard a) in accordance with its flight plan; and

b) in accordance with the requirements of air traffic


services;

except when, if not so precluded by the appropriate authority,


navigation for flights under VFR is accomplished by visual
reference to landmarks.
Chapter 2
2.5.2.2 For operations where a navigation specification R.(EU) No Difference
Reference for performance-based navigation (PBN) has been prescribed, 965/2012:SPA.PBN.100;N
2.5.2.2 an aeroplane shall, in addition to the requirements specified in CC.OP.116;AMC1
2.5.2.1: NCC.OP.116;NCO.OP.116

Standard a) be provided with navigation equipment which will


enable it to operate in accordance with the
prescribed navigation specification(s); and

b) have information relevant to the aeroplane


navigation specification capabilities listed in the
flight manual or other aeroplane documentation
approved by the State of Design or State of Registry;
and

c) where the aeroplane is operated in accordance with a


MEL, have information relevant to the aeroplane
navigation specification capabilities included in the
MEL.

Note.— Guidance on aeroplane documentation is


contained in the Performance-based Navigation (PBN)
Manual (Doc 9613).

14-December-2020 Page 102 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.5.2.3 The State of Registry shall establish criteria for R.(EU) Different in Different in character. The
Reference operations where a navigation specification for PBN has been 965/2012:NCC.OP.116;NC character or State of Operator shall
2.5.2.3 prescribed. O.OP.116. other means of establish those criteria for
compliance NCC operators and for NCO
operators using
Standard third-country registered
aircraft.
Chapter 2
2.5.2.4 In establishing criteria for operations where a R.(EU) Different in Different in character. The
Reference navigation specification for PBN has been prescribed, the 965/2012:SPA.PBN.100;N character or State of Operator instead of
2.5.2.4 State of Registry shall require that the operator/owner CC.OP.116;NCO.OP.116; other means of State of Registry for NCC
establish: AMC1 compliance operators and for NCO
NCC.OP.116;AMC7 operators using
Standard a) normal and abnormal procedures including NCC.OP.116;AMC1 third-country registered
contingency procedures; NCO.OP.116;AMC7 aircraft.
NCO.OP.116
b) flight crew qualification and proficiency
requirements, in accordance with the appropriate
navigation specifications;

c) training for relevant personnel consistent with the


intended operations; and

d) appropriate maintenance procedures to ensure


continued airworthiness, in accordance with the
appropriate navigation specifications.

Note 1.— Guidance on safety risks and mitigations for


PBN operations, in accordance with Annex 19, are
contained in the Performance-based Navigation (PBN)
Operational Approval Manual (Doc 9997).

Note 2.— Electronic navigation data management is an


integral part of normal and abnormal procedures.

14-December-2020 Page 103 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.5.2.5 The State of Registry shall issue a specific R.(EU) Different in Different in character.The
Reference approval for operations based on PBN authorization required 965/2012:SPA.PBN.100; character or State of Operator instead of
2.5.2.5 (AR) navigation specifications. SPA.PBN.105;ARO.OPS.2 other means of State of Registry for NCC
40 compliance operators and for NCO
Note.— Guidance on specific approvals for PBN operators using
Standard authorization required (AR) navigation specifications is third-country registered
contained in the Performance-based Navigation (PBN) aircraft.
Operational Approval Manual (Doc 9997).
Chapter 2
2.5.2.6 For flights in defined portions of airspace where, R.(EU) Different in Different in character.The
Reference based on Regional Air Navigation Agreement, minimum 965/2012:SPA.MNPS.100; character or State of Operator instead of
2.5.2.6 navigation performance specifications (MNPS) are prescribed, SPA.MNPS.105 other means of State of Registry for NCC
an aeroplane shall be provided with navigation equipment compliance operators and for NCO
which: operators using
Standard third-country registered
a) continuously provides indications to the flight crew aircraft.
of adherence to or departure from track to the
required degree of accuracy at any point along that
track; and

b) has been authorized by the State of Registry for the


MNPS operations concerned.

Note.— The prescribed minimum navigation


performance specifications and the procedures governing
their application are published in the Regional
Supplementary Procedures (Doc 7030).

14-December-2020 Page 104 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.5.2.7 For flights in defined portions of airspace where, R.(EU) Different in Different in character.The
Reference based on Regional Air Navigation Agreement, a reduced 965/2012:SPA.RVSM.100; character or State of Operator instead of
2.5.2.7 vertical separation minimum (RVSM) of 300 m (1 000 ft) is SPA.RVSM.105;SPA.RVS other means of State of Registry for NCC
applied between FL 290 and FL 410 inclusive: M.110;SPA.RVSM.115;A compliance operators and for NCO
MC1 SPA.RVSM.115 operators using
Standard a) the aeroplane shall be provided with equipment third-country registered
which is capable of: aircraft.

1) indicating to the flight crew the flight level being


flown;

2) automatically maintaining a selected flight level;

3) providing an alert to the flight crew when a


deviation occurs from the selected flight level.
The threshold for the alert shall not exceed ±90
m (300 ft); and

4) automatically reporting pressure-altitude;

b) the State of Registry shall issue a specific approval


for RVSM operations.

14-December-2020 Page 105 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.5.2.8 Prior to granting the RVSM specific approval R.(EU) Different in Different in character.The
Reference required in accordance with 2.5.2.7 b), the State shall be 965/2012:SPA.RVSM.105 character or State of Operator instead of
2.5.2.8 satisfied that: other means of State of Registry for NCC
compliance operators and for NCO
a) the vertical navigation performance capability of the operators using
Standard aeroplane satisfies the requirements specified in third-country registered
Appendix 2.2; aircraft.

b) the owner/operator has instituted appropriate


procedures in respect of continued airworthiness
(maintenance and repair) practices and programmes;
and

c) the owner/operator has instituted appropriate flight


crew procedures for operations in RVSM airspace.

Note.— An RVSM specific approval is valid globally on


the understanding that any operating procedures specific to
a given region will be stated in the operations manual or
appropriate crew guidance.
Chapter 2
2.5.2.9 The State of Registry shall ensure that, in respect R.(EU) Different in Different in character.The
Reference of those aeroplanes mentioned in 2.5.2.7, adequate provisions 965/2012:SPA.RVSM.115; character or State of Operator instead of
2.5.2.9 exist for: AMC2 ARO.OPS.200 (d) other means of State of Registry for NCC
compliance operators and for NCO
a) receiving the reports of height-keeping performance operators using
Standard issued by the monitoring agencies established in third-country registered
accordance with Annex 11, 3.3.5.1; and aircraft.

b) taking immediate corrective action for individual


aircraft, or aircraft type groups, identified in such
reports as not complying with the height-keeping
requirements for operation in airspace where RVSM
is applied.

14-December-2020 Page 106 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.5.2.10 The State of Registry that has issued an RVSM R.(EU) Less protective Partially implemented.EU RVSM monitoring is
Reference specific approval to an owner/operator shall establish a 965/2012:ARO.OPS.200;S or partially rules require to monitor the organised at regional
2.5.2.10 requirement which ensures that a minimum of two aeroplanes PA.RVSM.105;AMC2 implemented or aircraft height keeping level (EUR RMA).
of each aircraft type grouping of the owner/operator have ARO.OPS.200;AMC1 not performance, but not in a Operators are required to
their height-keeping performance monitored, at least once SPA.RVSM.105 implemented specific interval. enrol in the
Standard every two years or within intervals of 1 000 flight hours per heightmonitoring
aeroplane, whichever period is longer. If an owner/operator programmes.Moreover,
aircraft type grouping consists of a single aeroplane, in the EU system, the
monitoring of that aeroplane shall be accomplished within the State of Operator is
specified period. responsible for the
oversight of NCC
Note.— Monitoring data from any regional monitoring operators and for NCO
programme established in accordance with Annex 11, operators using
3.3.5.2, may be used to satisfy the requirement. third-country registered
aircraft.
Chapter 2
2.5.2.11 All States that are responsible for airspace R.(EU) No Difference
Reference where RVSM has been implemented, or that have issued 965/2012:ARO.OPS.200;A
2.5.2.11 RVSM specific approvals to owners/operators within their MC2 ARO.OPS.200
State, shall establish provisions and procedures which ensure
that appropriate action will be taken in respect of aircraft and
Standard owners/operators found to be operating in RVSM airspace
without a valid RVSM specific approval.

Note 1.— These provisions and procedures need to


address both the situation where the aircraft in question was
operating without a specific approval in the airspace of the
State, and the situation where an owner/operator for which
the State has regulatory oversight responsibility is found to
be operating without the required specific approval in the
airspace of another State.

Note 2.— Guidance material relating to the specific


approval for operation in RVSM airspace is contained in the
Manual on a 300 m (1 000 ft) Vertical Separation Minimum
Between FL 290 and FL 410 Inclusive (Doc 9574).

14-December-2020 Page 107 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.5.2.12 The aeroplane shall be sufficiently provided R.(EU) No Difference
Reference with navigation equipment to ensure that, in the event of the 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.250
2.5.2.12 failure of one item of equipment at any stage of the flight, the pt. (b);NCO.IDE.A.195 pt.
remaining equipment will enable the aeroplane to navigate in (b)
accordance with 2.5.2.1 and where applicable 2.5.2.2, 2.5.2.6
Standard and 2.5.2.7.

Note 1.— This requirement may be met by means other


than the duplication of equipment.

Note 2.— Guidance material relating to aircraft


equipment necessary for flight in airspace where a 300 m (1
000 ft) VSM is applied above FL 290 is contained in the
Manual on a 300 m (1 000 ft) Vertical Separation Minimum
Between FL 290 and FL 410 Inclusive (Doc 9574).
Chapter 2
2.5.2.13 On flights in which it is intended to land in R.(EU) No Difference
Reference instrument meteorological conditions, an aeroplane shall be 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.250
2.5.2.13 provided with radio equipment capable of receiving signals pt. (c);NCO.IDE.A.195 pt.
providing guidance to a point from which a visual landing can (c)
be effected. This equipment shall be capable of providing
Standard such guidance for each aerodrome at which it is intended to
land in instrument meteorological conditions and for any
designated alternate aerodromes.

Chapter 2
2.5.3 Surveillance equipment R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.255;
2.5.3.1 2.5.3.1 An aeroplane shall be provided with surveillance NCO.IDE.A.200;AMC1
equipment which will enable it to operate in accordance with NCO.IDE.A.200
the requirements of air traffic services.
Standard

14-December-2020 Page 108 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.5.3.2 For operations where surveillance equipment is R.(EU) No Difference Not applicable to NCO
Reference required to meet an RSP specification for performance-based 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.255; because such operations
2.5.3.2 surveillance (PBS), an aeroplane shall, in addition to the are not performed with
requirements specified in 2.5.3.1: aircraft used for NCO.

Standard a) be provided with surveillance equipment which will


enable it to operate in accordance with the
prescribed RSP specification(s);

b) have information relevant to the aeroplane RSP


specification capabilities listed in the flight manual or
other aeroplane documentation approved by the
State of Design or State of Registry; and

c) where the aeroplane is operated in accordance with a


MEL, have information relevant to the aeroplane RSP
specification capabilities included in the MEL.

Note 1.— Information on surveillance equipment is


contained in the Aeronautical Surveillance Manual (Doc
9924).

Note 2.— Information on RSP specifications for


performance-based surveillance is contained in the
Performance-based Communication and Surveillance (PBCS)
Manual (Doc 9869).
Chapter 2
2.5.3.3 The State of Registry shall establish criteria for R.(EU) 965/2012: Different in Different in character The Not applicable to NCO
Reference operations where an RSP specification for PBS has been NCC.IDE.A.255 character or State of Operator shall because such operations
2.5.3.3 prescribed. other means of establish those criteria for are not performed with
compliance operators using aircraft used for NCO.
third-country registered
Standard aircraft.

14-December-2020 Page 109 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.5.3.4 In establishing criteria for operations where an R.(EU) Different in Different in character The Not applicable to NCO
Reference RSP specification for PBS has been prescribed, the State of 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.255 character or State of Operator is the because such operations
2.5.3.4 Registry shall require that the operator/owner establish: other means of competent authority for are not performed with
compliance operators using aircraft used for NCO.
a) normal and abnormal procedures, including third-country registered
Standard contingency procedures; aircraft.

b) flight crew qualification and proficiency


requirements, in accordance with appropriate RSP
specifications;

c) a training programme for relevant personnel


consistent with the intended operations; and

d) appropriate maintenance procedures to ensure


continued airworthiness, in accordance with
appropriate RSP specifications.
Chapter 2
2.5.3.5 The State of Registry shall ensure that, in respect R.(EU) Different in Different in character The Not applicable to NCO
Reference of those aeroplanes mentioned in 2.5.3.2, adequate provisions 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.255 character or State of Operator is the because such operations
2.5.3.5 exist for: other means of competent authority for are not performed with
compliance 32operators using aircraft used for NCO.
a) receiving the reports of observed surveillance third-country registered
Standard performance issued by monitoring programmes aircraft.
established in accordance with Annex 11, Chapter 3,
3.3.5.2; and

b) taking immediate corrective action for individual


aircraft, aircraft types or operators, identified in such
reports as not complying with the RSP
specification(s).

14-December-2020 Page 110 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
CHAPTER 2.6 AEROPLANE R. (EU) Less protective Partially implemented.Risk
Reference 1321/2014:M.A.201(a) and or partially assessment when
2.6.1.1 MAINTENANCE†† (b);M1.1M.A.704 (a) implemented or approving a maintenance
(7);M.A.704(b);M.A.712( not programme not based on
b)1.ML.A.201(a) and implemented the type certificate holder's
Standard (b);ML1.1CAMO.A.300(a maintenance
Note 1.— For the purpose of this chapter “aeroplane” )11CAMO.A.300(b)CAM recommendations not
includes: engines, propellers, components, accessories, O.A.200(a)6CAO.A.025(a) addressed.
instruments, equipment and apparatus including emergency 10 CAO.A.100(b)
equipment.

Note 2.— Guidance on continuing airworthiness


requirements is contained in the Airworthiness Manual (Doc
9760).

Note 3.— States are encouraged to conduct a risk


assessment when approving a maintenance programme not
based on the type certificate holder’s maintenance
recommendations.

2.6.1 Owner’s maintenance responsibilities††

2.6.1.1 The owner of an aeroplane, or in the case where


it is leased, the lessee, shall ensure that, in accordance with
procedures acceptable to the State of Registry:

a) the aeroplane is maintained in an airworthy


condition;

b) the operational and emergency equipment necessary


for an intended flight is serviceable; and

c) the certificate of airworthiness of the aeroplane


remains valid.

14-December-2020 Page 111 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

-------------------------------------------------------------
†† As of 5 November 2020, the following Chapter and
section will be titled:
Chapter 2.6 — Aeroplane Continuing Airworthiness
Paragraph 2.6.1 — Owner’s continuing airworthiness
responsibilities
Chapter 2
2.6.1.2 Until 4 November 2020, the owner or the lessee R.(EU) No Difference
Reference shall not operate the aeroplane unless it is maintained and 1321/2014:M.A.201(g) and
2.6.1.2 released to service under a system acceptable to the State of (i)(2);M.A.708(b)
Registry. (4);145.A.50 (a) and
(b);M.A.801(b);ML.A.201
Standard ;ML.A.801(a) and
(b);CAO.A.065;CAMO.A.
315(b)6
Chapter 2
2.6.1.2 As of 5 November 2020, the owner or the lessee R.(EU) No Difference
Reference shall not operate an aeroplane unless maintenance on the 1321/2014:M.A.201;M.A.7
2.6.1.2 aeroplane, including any associated engine, propeller and 08(b)
part, is carried out: (4);M.A.801(b).ML.A.201;
ML.A.801(a) and
Standard a) by an organization complying with Annex 8, Part II, (b)CAMO.A.315(b)
Chapter 6 that is either approved by the State of (6)CAO.A.065.
Registry of the aeroplane or is approved by another
Contracting State and is accepted by the State of
Registry; or

b) by a person or organization in accordance with


procedures that are authorized by the State of
Registry;

and there is a maintenance release in relation to the


maintenance carried out.

14-December-2020 Page 112 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.6.1.3 Until 4 November 2020, when the maintenance R.(EU) No Difference Partially
Reference release is not issued by an approved maintenance 1321/2014:M.A.801(b)M. implemented.Pilot-owner
2.6.1.3 organization in accordance with Annex 6, Part I, 8.7, the A.607(a);M.A.612.ML.A.8 authorisation does not
person signing the maintenance release shall be licensed in 01(b).MLA.803.CAO.A.06 comply with the
accordance with Annex 1. 5;CAO.A.040(a). requirement that a person
Standard shall be appropriately
licenced in accordance with
Annex 1.
Chapter 2
2.6.1.4 The owner or the lessee shall ensure that the R. (EU) No Difference
Reference maintenance of the aeroplane is performed in accordance with 1321/2014:M.A.201(a)
2.6.1.4 a maintenance programme acceptable to the State of Registry. (4);M.A.708(b)
(4);ML.A.201(a)
(4);ML.A.301(c);CAO.A.0
Standard 75(b)4;CAMO.A.315(a).

14-December-2020 Page 113 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.6.2 Maintenance records†† R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 1321/2014:M.A.305(e).ML
2.6.2.1 2.6.2.1 The owner of an aeroplane, or in the case where .A.305.CAO.A.090;CAM
it is leased, the lessee, shall ensure that the following records O.A.220
are kept for the periods mentioned in 2.6.2.2:
Standard
a) the total time in service (hours, calendar time and
cycles, as appropriate) of the aeroplane and all
life-limited components;

b) the current status of compliance with all applicable


mandatory continuing airworthiness information;

c) appropriate details of modifications and repairs;

d) the time in service (hours, calendar time and cycles,


as appropriate) since the last overhaul of the
aeroplane or its components subject to a mandatory
overhaul life;

e) the current status of the aeroplane’s compliance with


the maintenance programme; and

f) the detailed maintenance records to show that all


requirements for the signing of a maintenance release
have been met.

-------------------------------------------------------------
†† As of 5 November 2020, 2.6.2 will be titled Continuing
Airworthiness Records.

14-December-2020 Page 114 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.6.2.2 The records in 2.6.2.1 a) to e) shall be kept for a R.(EU) More Exacting Retaining periods exceed
Reference minimum period of 90 days after the unit to which they refer 1321/2014:M.A.305;ML.A or Exceeds requirements
2.6.2.2 has been permanently withdrawn from service and the records .305.
in 2.6.2.1 f) for a minimum period of one year after the signing
of the maintenance release.
Standard

Chapter 2
2.6.2.3 In the event of a temporary change of owner or R.(EU) No Difference Temporary change of
Reference lessee, the records shall be made available to the new owner 1321/2014:M.A.201(b)M. operator not mentioned
2.6.2.3 or lessee. In the event of any permanent change of owner or A.307(a) and (c);AMC but linked to lease
lessee, the records shall be transferred to the new owner or M.A.307(a).ML.A.201(b) agreement of less than 6
lessee. ML.A.307(a) and (c). months
Standard
Note 1. — Until 4 November 2020, maintenance records
or related documents, other than a valid certificate of
airworthiness, need not be carried in the aeroplane during
international flights.

Note 2. — In the context of 2.6.2.3, a judgement on what


should be considered as a temporary change of owner or
lessee will need to be made by the State of Registry in the
light of the need to exercise control over the records, which
will depend on access to them and the opportunity to update
them.

14-December-2020 Page 115 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.6.2.3 In the event of a temporary change of owner or R.(EU) No Difference Temporary change of
Reference lessee, the records shall be made available to the new owner 1321/2014:M.A.201(b)M. operator not mentioned
2.6.2.3 or lessee. In the event of any permanent change of owner or A.307(a) and (c);AMC but linked to lease
lessee, the records shall be transferred to the new owner or M.A.307(a).ML.A.201(b) agreement of less than 6
lessee. ML.A.307(a) and (c). months
Standard

Note 1. — As of 5 November 2020, continuing


airworthiness records or related documents, other than a
valid certificate of airworthiness, need not be carried in the
aeroplane during international flights.

Note 2. — In the context of 2.6.2.3, a judgement on what


should be considered as a temporary change of owner or
lessee will need to be made by the State of Registry in the
light of the need to exercise control over the records, which
will depend on access to them and the opportunity to update
them.
Chapter 2
2.6.2.4 As of 5 November 2020, records kept and R.(EU) No Difference
Reference transferred in accordance with 2.6.2 shall be maintained in a 1321/2014:M.A.305M.A.3
2.6.2.4 form and format that ensures readability, security and 07(a);AMC
integrity of the records at all times. M.A.307(a)ML.A.305ML.
A.307(a);CAO.A.090CA
Standard Note 1.— The form and format of the records may MO.A.220
include, for example, paper records, film records, electronic
records or any combination thereof.

Note 2.— Guidance regarding electronic aircraft


continuing airworthiness records is included in the
Airworthiness Manual (Doc 9760).

14-December-2020 Page 116 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.6.3 Modifications and repairs R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 1321/2014:M.A.301(6);M.
2.6.3 All modifications and repairs shall comply with airworthiness A.304;AMC
requirements acceptable to the State of Registry. Procedures M.A.305(d);M.A.305(d)
shall be established to ensure that the substantiating data (2);ML.A.301(6);ML.A.30
Standard supporting compliance with the airworthiness requirements 4;ML.A.305(d)
are retained. (2);CAO.A.025(10);CAM
O.A.315(b)(3).

Chapter 2
2.6.4 Maintenance release R.(EU) No Difference The term ‘certificate of
Reference 1321/2014:145.A.50(a) and release to service’ (CRS)
2.6.4.1 2.6.4.1 Until 4 November 2020, a maintenance release (b);145.A.50(d);M.A.612; is used instead of
shall be completed and signed, as prescribed by the State of M.A.613(a);M.A.801;M.A maintenance release.
Registry, to certify that the maintenance work performed has .802;AMC
Standard been completed satisfactorily and in accordance with data and M.A.801(b);ML.A.801;M
procedures acceptable to the State of Registry. L.A.802;CAO.A.065CAO.
A.070.
Chapter 2
2.6.4.1 As of 5 November 2020, when maintenance is R.(EU) No Difference The term ‘certificate of
Reference carried out by an approved maintenance organization, the 1321/2014:145.A.50(a) and release to service’ (CRS)
2.6.4.1 maintenance release shall be issued by the approved (b);145.A.50(d);M.A.612; is used instead of
maintenance organization in accordance with the provisions M.A.613(a);M.A.801;M.A maintenance
of Annex 8, Part II, 6.8. .402(c);M.A.802;ML.A.80 release.Part-M subpart F
Standard 1;ML.A.802;CAO.A.065; can be applied until
CAO.A.070. 8-7-2021.

14-December-2020 Page 117 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.6.4.2 Until 4 November 2020, a maintenance release R.(EU) 1321/2014:145.A.50 Less protective Partially implemented.Point Maintenance and release
Reference shall contain a certification including: (a);M.A.612;Appendix II or partially d) identity of the person to service by a person
2.6.4.2 to implemented or has not been explicitly can be performed by
a) basic details of the maintenance performed; PartM;M.A.801(f);AMC not specified in the EU Part-MF or
145.A.50(b);AMC implemented requirements for the aircraft Part-CAO.Part-M subpart
Standard b) the date such maintenance was completed; M.A.801(f).ML.A.801(e). Certificate of Release to F can be applied until
ML.A.802;CAO.A.065;C Service (CRS), in addition to 8-7-2021.
c) when applicable, the identity of the approved AO.A.070. the requirement for the
maintenance organization; and identity of the
organisation.For
d) the identity of the authorized person or persons components, the name of
signing the release. the Certifying Staff is
foreseen in Form 1 block 14.
Chapter 2
2.6.4.2 As of 5 November 2020, when maintenance is R.(EU) Less protective Partially Part-M subpart F can be
Reference not carried out by an approved maintenance organization, the 1321/2014:M.A.801(e);M. or partially implemented.Maintenance applied until 8-7-2021.
2.6.4.2 maintenance release shall be completed and signed by a A.802;M.A.803;ML.A.801 implemented or and release to service by a
person appropriately licensed in accordance with Annex 1 to (e);ML.A.802;ML.A.803; not person can be performed by
certify that the maintenance work performed has been CAO.A.065CAO.A.070 implemented Part-MF, or Part-CAO or by
Standard completed satisfactorily and in accordance with data and a pilot/owner after limited
procedures acceptable to the State of Registry. pilot/owner maintenance
Chapter 2
2.6.4.3 As of 5 November 2020, when maintenance is R.(EU) 1321/2014:145.A.50 No Difference
Reference not carried out by an approved maintenance organization, the (a);Appendix II to
2.6.4.3 maintenance release shall include the following: PartM;M.A.801(f);AMC
145.A.50(b);AMC
a) basic details of the maintenance performed; M.A.801(f)
Standard (2)ML.A.801(e);
b) the date such maintenance was completed; and

c) the identity of the authorized person or persons


signing the release.

14-December-2020 Page 118 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
CHAPTER 2.7 AEROPLANE R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:ORO.FC.100 pt.
2.7.1 FLIGHT CREW (a),(b),(c) &
(e);NCO.GEN.105 pt. (a)
(4);NCC.GEN.106 pt. (a)
Standard (4).R. (EU)
2.7.1 Composition of the flight crew 2018/1139:Annex V pt. 7.1

The number and composition of the flight crew shall not be


less than that specified in the flight manual or other
documents associated with the certificate of airworthiness.

Chapter 2
2.7.2 Qualifications R.(EU) Different in Different in character. State Reg.(EU) 2020/723
Reference 965/2012:ORO.FC.100 pt. character or of Operator instead of State addresses acceptance of
2.7.2.1 2.7.2.1 The pilot-in-command shall: (c).R. (EU) 2018/1139:Art. other means of of Registry for the NCC third-country licences.
21On maintained compliance operators and NCO
a) ensure that each flight crew member holds a valid competency: Annex IV: operators of third-country
Standard licence issued by the State of Registry, or if issued pt. 1.c.2 and 1.e.2.R.(EU) registered aircraft.
by another Contracting State, rendered valid by the 2020/723:Art. 1
State of Registry;

b) ensure that flight crew members are properly rated;


and

c) be satisfied that flight crew members have


maintained competency.

14-December-2020 Page 119 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.7.2.2 The pilot-in-command of an aeroplane equipped R. (EU) No Difference Part-NCC addresses this
Reference with an airborne collision avoidance system (ACAS II) shall 965/2012:NCC.OP.220;NC rule to the operator, not
2.7.2.2 ensure that each flight crew member has been appropriately O.OP.220. to the PIC.
trained to competency in the use of ACAS II equipment and
the avoidance of collision.
Standard
Note 1.— Procedures for the use of ACAS II equipment
are specified in the Procedures for Air Navigation Services —
Aircraft Operations (PANS-OPS, Doc 8168), Volume I —
Flight Procedures. ACAS II Training Guidelines for Pilots are
provided in PANS-OPS, Volume I, Attachment A to Part III,
Section 3, Chapter 3.

Note 2.— Appropriate training, to the satisfaction of the


State, to competency in the use of ACAS II equipment and the
avoidance of collisions may be evidenced, for example, by:

a) possession of a type rating for an aeroplane


equipped with ACAS II, where the operation and
use of ACAS II are included in the training syllabus
for the type rating; or

b) possession of a document issued by a training


organization or person approved by the State to
conduct training for pilots in the use of ACAS II,
indicating that the holder has been trained in
accordance with the guidelines referred to in Note
1; or

c) a comprehensive pre-flight briefing by a pilot who


has been trained in the use of ACAS II in
accordance with the guidelines referred to in Note
1.

14-December-2020 Page 120 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
CHAPTER 2.8 MANUALS, LOGS R.(EU) Different in Different in character. State
Reference 1321/2014:M.A.901;M.A.7 character or of Operator instead of State
2.8.1 AND RECORDS 10 (a)(2) other means of of Registry for the NCC
compliance operators and NCO
operators of third-country
Standard registered aircraft.
Note.— The following documents are associated with
this Annex but are not included in this chapter:

Maintenance records — see 2.6.2.††

2.8.1 Flight manual

Note.— The aeroplane flight manual contains the


information specified in Annex 8.

The aeroplane flight manual shall be updated by implementing


changes made mandatory by the State of Registry.

Chapter 2
2.8.2 Journey log book R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCO.GEN.150;O
2.8.2.1 2.8.2.1 A journey log book shall be maintained for every RO.MLR.110;AMC1
aeroplane engaged in international air navigation in which ORO.MLR.110
shall be entered particulars of the aeroplane, its crew and each
Standard journey.

-------------------------------------------------------------
†† As of 5 November 2020, section 2.6.2 will be titled
Continuing Airworthiness Records.

14-December-2020 Page 121 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
2.8.2.2 Recommendation.— The aeroplane journey log R.(EU) No Difference
Reference should contain the following items: 965/2012:ORO.MLR.110;
2.8.2.2 AMC1
a) aeroplane nationality and registration; ORO.MLR.110;AMC1
NCO.GEN.150.
Recommendation b) date;

c) crew member names and duty assignments;

d) departure and arrival points and times;

e) purpose of flight;

f) observations regarding the flight; and

g) signature of the pilot-in-command.

Chapter 2
2.8.3 Records of emergency and survival equipment carried R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.GEN.135;A
2.8.3 The owner of the aeroplane, or in the case where it is leased, MC1
the lessee, shall at all times have available for immediate NCC.GEN.135;NCO.GEN.1
communication to rescue coordination centres, lists 30;AMC1 NCO.GEN.130
Standard containing information on the emergency and survival
equipment carried on board the aeroplane engaged in
international air navigation. The information shall include, as
applicable, the number, colour and type of life rafts and
pyrotechnics, details of emergency medical supplies, water
supplies and the type and frequencies of the emergency
portable radio equipment.

14-December-2020 Page 122 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 2
R.(EU) 2018/1139:Annex Less protective Partially Reg.(EC) No 300/2008
CHAPTER 2.9 SECURITY
Reference V: pt. 8.4 or partially implemented.National rules establishes the
2.9.1 implemented or apply.Reg. (EC) No requirements related to
not 300/2008 does not contain aviation security. The
implemented references to regulation is implemented
2.9.1 Security of aircraft
Standard pilot-in-command by each Member State
responsibilities related to through their own
The pilot-in-command shall be responsible for the security of
the security of aircraft. national security
the aircraft during its operation.
programmes.

Chapter 2
2.9.2 Reporting acts of unlawful interference R. (EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.GEN.106 pt.
2.9.2 Following an act of unlawful interference, the (f);NCO.GEN.105 pt. (g)
pilot-in-command shall submit a report of such an act to the
designated local authority.
Standard
Note.— In the context of this chapter, the word
“security” is used in the sense of prevention of acts of
unlawful interference against civil aviation.

14-December-2020 Page 123 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
R.(EU) 965/2012:Article 5, No Difference The concept of ‘general
CHAPTER 3.1 APPLICABILITY
Reference pt. (3), (4). aviation’ is transposed in
3.1.1 the EU air operations
rules under Part-NCC and
Part-NCO.
3.1.1 The following operations shall be subject to the
Standard
Standards and Recommended Practices of Section 2, and
those of Section 3:

International general aviation operations with:

a) aeroplanes with a maximum certificated take-off mass


exceeding 5 700 kg; or

b) aeroplanes equipped with one or more turbojet


engines.
Chapter 3
3.1.2 Recommendation.— An operation involving an R.(EU) 965/2012:Article 5 Less protective Less protective
Reference aeroplane with a seating configuration of more than 9 pt. (3), (4). or partially Definition of complex
3.1.2 passenger seats should be conducted in accordance with implemented or motor-powered aeroplane
Section 3. not includes aeroplanes only
implemented with a MOPSC of more
Recommendation Note.— The applicability of 3.1 does not preclude a than 19.
general aviation operator from satisfying the requirements of
Section 3 where it may be to the operator’s advantage.

14-December-2020 Page 124 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
R.(EU) 965/2012:Article 5 No Difference The term “corporate
CHAPTER 3.2 CORPORATE
Reference pt. (3), (4). aviation operations” is
3.2.0.1 AVIATION OPERATIONS explained in EASA GM
Article 2(1)(d) as a type
of non-commercial
Recommendation operation.The concept is
Recommendation.— A corporate aviation operation covered by the EU
involving three or more aircraft that are operated by pilots non-commercial
employed for the purpose of flying the aircraft should be operations requirements.
conducted in accordance with Section 3.

Note.— The term “aircraft” is used to indicate that a


corporate aviation operation using a mix of aeroplanes and
helicopters is subject to this Recommendation as long as at
least one aeroplane is involved.

14-December-2020 Page 125 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
CHAPTER 3.3 GENERAL R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:ORO.GEN.110
3.3.1.1 pt. (g);NCC.GEN.110 pt.
(a).
3.3.1 Compliance with laws, regulations and procedures
Standard

3.3.1.1 The operator shall ensure that all employees


know that they must comply with the laws, regulations and
procedures of those States in which operations are
conducted.

Note.— Information for pilots on flight procedure


parameters and operational procedures is contained in
PANS-OPS (Doc 8168), Volume I. Criteria for the
construction of visual and instrument flight procedures are
contained in PANS-OPS (Doc 8168), Volume II. Obstacle
clearance criteria and procedures used in certain States may
differ from PANS-OPS, and knowledge of these differences is
important for safety reasons.
Chapter 3
3.3.1.2 The operator shall ensure that all pilots are R.(EU) No Difference
Reference familiar with the laws, regulations and procedures, pertinent to 965/2012:ORO.GEN.110;N
3.3.1.2 the performance of their duties, prescribed for the areas to be CC.GEN.110 pt. (b).
traversed, the aerodromes to be used and the air navigation
facilities relating thereto. The operator shall ensure that other
Standard members of the flight crew are familiar with such of these laws,
regulations and procedures as are pertinent to the
performance of their respective duties in the operation of the
aeroplane.

14-December-2020 Page 126 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
3.3.1.3 The pilot-in-command is responsible for R.(EU) No Difference
Reference operational control. The operator shall describe the 965/2012:ORO.GEN.110
3.3.1.3 operational control system in the operations manual and pt. (c);NCC.GEN.106 pt.
identify the roles and responsibilities of those involved with (a)(2);AMC1
the system. ORO.GEN.110(c).
Standard
Note.— The rights and obligations of a State in respect
to the operation of aeroplanes registered in that State are
not affected by this provision.
Chapter 3
3.3.1.4 The operator shall ensure that the R.(EU) No Difference
Reference pilot-in-command has available on board the aeroplane all the 965/2012:NCC.GEN.140 (a)
3.3.1.4 essential information concerning the search and rescue (13)
services in the area over which the aeroplane will be flown.

Standard Note.— This information may be made available to the


pilot by means of the operations manual or such other means
as is considered appropriate.
Chapter 3
3.3.1.5 The operator shall ensure that flight crew R.(EU) No Difference
Reference members demonstrate the ability to speak and understand the 965/2012:ORO.FC.100.R.
3.3.1.5 language used for aero n a u t i c a l radiotelephony (EU) 1178/2011:FCL.055.R.
communications as specified in Annex 1. (EU) 2018/1139:Annex IV,
pt. 1.6
Standard

14-December-2020 Page 127 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
3.3.2 Safety management R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.GEN.145 pt.
3.3.2.1 Note.— Annex 19 includes safety management (f)
provisions for international general aviation operators of
large or turbojet aeroplanes. Further guidance is contained
Standard in the Safety Management Manual (SMM) (Doc 9859).

3.3.2.1 As of 7 November 2019, States shall not allow the


use of recordings or transcripts of CVR, CARS, Class A AIR
and Class A AIRS for purposes other than the investigation of
an accident or incident as per Annex 13, except where the
recordings or transcripts are:

a) related to a safety-related event identified in the


context of a safety management system; are
restricted to the relevant portions of a de-identified
transcript of the recording; and are subject to the
protections accorded by Annex 19;

b) sought for use in criminal proceedings not related to


an event involving an accident or incident
investigation and are subject to the protections
accorded by Annex 19; or

c) used for inspections of flight recorder systems as


provided in Section 7 of Appendix 2.3.

Note.— Provisions on the protection of safety data,


safety information and related sources are contained in
Appendix 3 to Annex 19. When an investigation under Annex
13 is instituted, investigation records are subject to the
protections accorded by Annex 13.

14-December-2020 Page 128 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
3.3.2.2 As of 7 November 2019, States shall not allow R.(EU) No Difference
Reference the use of recordings or transcripts of FDR, ADRS, Class B 965/2012:NCC.GEN.145 pt.
3.3.2.2 and C AIR, and Class B and C AIRS for purposes other than (f)
the investigation of an accident or incident as per Annex 13,
except where the recordings or transcripts are subject to the
Standard protections accorded by Annex 19 and are:

a) used by the operator for airworthiness or


maintenance purposes;

b) sought for use in proceedings not related to an event


involving an accident or incident investigation;

c) de-identified; or

d) disclosed under secure procedures.

Note.— Provisions on the protection of safety data,


safety information and related sources are contained in
Appendix 3 to Annex 19.

14-December-2020 Page 129 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
CHAPTER 3.4 FLIGHT R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.OP.135 pt.
3.4.1 OPERATIONS (a).R.(EU)
2018/1139:Annex V: pt.
2(a).
Standard
3.4.1 Operating facilities

The operator shall ensure that a flight will not be commenced


unless it has been ascertained by every reasonable means
available that the ground and/or water facilities including
communication facilities and navigation aids available and
directly required on such flight, for the safe operation of the
aeroplane, are adequate for the type of operation under which
the flight is to be conducted.

Note.— “Reasonable means” in this Standard is


intended to denote the use, at the point of departure, of
information available to the operator either through official
information published by the aeronautical information
services or readily obtainable from other sources.

Chapter 3
3.4.2 Operational management R.(EU) Different in Different in characterThe
Reference 965/2012:ORO.DEC.100;A character or EU system has the State of
3.4.2.1.1 ppendix I to Annex III other means of Operator instead of State of
3.4.2.1 Operator notification (Part-ORO) (Declaration) compliance Registry as the Competent
Authority.
Standard 3.4.2.1.1 If the operator has an operating base in a State
other than the State of Registry, the operator shall notify the
State in which the operating base is located.

14-December-2020 Page 130 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
3.4.2.1.2 Upon notification in accordance with 3.4.2.1.1, R.(EU) Different in Other means of compliance
Reference safety and security oversight shall be coordinated between 965/2012:ARO.GEN.300 character or EU rules provide for the
3.4.2.1.2 the State in which the operating base is located and the State pt. (d), (e).R.(EC) other means of cooperative oversight of
of Registry. 300/2008:Art. 15 compliance activities of operators
established or residing in
Standard another EU member
state.Reg. (EC) 300/2008
establishes requirements for
inspections by the
Commission in cooperation
with Member States.
Chapter 3
3.4.2.2 Operations manual R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:ORO.MLR.100
3.4.2.2 The operator shall provide, for the use and guidance of pt. (a), (d), (e), (f).R.(EU)
personnel concerned, an operations manual containing all the 2018/1139:Annex V: pt. 8.2
instructions and information necessary for operations
Standard personnel to perform their duties. The operations manual shall
be amended or revised as is necessary to ensure that the
information contained therein is kept up to date. All such
amendments or revisions shall be issued to all personnel that
are required to use this manual.

Note 1.— States may reference accepted and recognized


industry codes of practice as the basis for the development of
an operations manual.

Note 2.— Attachment 3.A contains guidance on the


organization and content of an operations manual.

Chapter 3
3.4.2.3 Operating instructions — general R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:ORO.GEN.110
3.4.2.3.1 3.4.2.3.1 The operator shall ensure that all operations pt. (e)
personnel are properly instructed in their particular duties and
responsibilities and the relationship of such duties to the
Standard operation as a whole.

14-December-2020 Page 131 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
3.4.2.3.2 Recommendation.— The operator should issue R.(EU) No Difference
Reference operating instructions and provide information on 965/2012:ORO.GEN.110
3.4.2.3.2 aeroplane climb performance with all engines operating to pt. (i);AMC3
enable the pilot-in-command to determine the climb gradient ORO.MLR.100 pt. (a)
that can be achieved during the departure phase for the Operations Manual Part B
Recommendation existing take-off conditions and intended take-off technique. Ch. 4
This information should be included in the operations
manual.

Chapter 3
3.4.2.4 In-flight simulation of emergency situations R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.OP.200
3.4.2.4 The operator shall ensure that when passengers are being
carried, no emergency or abnormal situations shall be
simulated.
Standard

Chapter 3
3.4.2.5 Checklists R.(EU) 965/2012: No Difference
Reference ORO.GEN.110 pt.
3.4.2.5 Checklists shall be used by flight crews prior to, during and (h);NCC.GEN.106 pt. (a)
after all phases of operations, and in emergencies, to ensure (3).R.(EU)
compliance with the operating procedures contained in the 2018/1139:Annex V: pt. 1.2
Standard aircraft operating manual and the aeroplane flight manual or and 8.11.
other documents associated with the certificate of
airworthiness and otherwise in the operations manual. The
design and utilization of checklists shall observe Human
Factors principles.

Note.— Guidance material on the application of Human


Factors principles can be found in the Human Factors
Training Manual (Doc 9683).

14-December-2020 Page 132 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
3.4.2.6 Minimum flight altitudes R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.OP.125
3.4.2.6 The operator shall specify, for flights which are to be
conducted in accordance with the instrument flight rules, the
method of establishing terrain clearance altitudes.
Standard

Chapter 3
3.4.2.7 Aerodrome operating minima R.(EU) Different in Different in character. For Not applicable to NCO
Reference 965/2012:NCC.OP.110;SP character or NCC operators, the State of because such operations
3.4.2.7 The operator shall establish aerodrome operating minima, in A.GEN.100. other means of Operator establishes the are not performed with
accordance with criteria specified by the State of Registry, for compliance criteria instead of the State aircraft used for NCO.
each aerodrome to be used in operations. When establishing of Registry. For low
Standard aerodrome operating minima, any conditions that may be visibility operations (LVO),
prescribed in the list of specific approvals shall be observed. it is the competent authority
Such minima shall not be lower than any that may be as established by Annex V
established for such aerodromes by the State of the (Part-SPA):State of the
Aerodrome, except when specifically approved by that State. Operator if the aircraft is
registered in an EU Member
Note.— This Standard does not require the State of the State; or State of Registry if
Aerodrome to establish aerodrome operating minima. the aircraft is registered in a
third country and the State
of Registry has already
issued the LVO specific
approval.

14-December-2020 Page 133 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
3.4.2.8 Fatigue management programme R.(EU) 2018/1139:Annex Less protective Partially
Reference V: pt. 7.5; pt. 8.7 or partially implementedHighlevel
3.4.2.8 The operator shall establish and implement a fatigue implemented or requirements are included in
management programme that ensures that all operator not the Essential Requirements,
personnel involved in the operation and maintenance of implemented Annex V to Regulation (EU)
Standard aircraft do not carry out their duties when fatigued. The 2018/1139. Detailed FTL
programme shall address flight and duty times and be provisions are determined
included in the operations manual. at national level.Fatigue
requirements for
Note.— Guidance on fatigue management programmes maintenance personnel not
can be found in the Fatigue Management Manual for General addressed.
Aviation (Doc 10033).

Chapter 3
3.4.2.9 Passengers R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.OP.140 pt.
3.4.2.9.1 3.4.2.9.1 The operator shall ensure that passengers are (a)
made familiar with the location and use of:

Standard a) seat belts;


b) emergency exits;

c) life jackets, if the carriage of life jackets is prescribed;

d) oxygen dispensing equipment, if the provision of


oxygen for the use of passengers is prescribed; and

e) other emergency equipment provided for individual


use, including passenger emergency briefing cards.
Chapter 3
3.4.2.9.2 The operator shall ensure that all persons on R.(EU) No Difference For the European rules,
Reference board are aware of the location and general manner of use of 965/2012:NCC.OP.140 pt. the requirement is
3.4.2.9.2 the principal emergency equipment carried for collective use. (b);AMC1 NCC.OP.140. addressed to the
pilotin-command.

Standard

14-December-2020 Page 134 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
3.4.2.9.3 The operator shall ensure that in an emergency R.(EU) No Difference In the European rules,
Reference during flight, passengers are instructed in such emergency 965/2012:NCC.OP.140 pt. the requirement is
3.4.2.9.3 action as may be appropriate to the circumstances. (b);AMC1 NCC.OP.140.R. addressed to the
(EU) 2018/1139:Annex V: pilotin-command.
pt. 3.(f)
Standard

Chapter 3
3.4.2.9.4 The operator shall ensure that during take-off R.(EU) No Difference In the European rules,
Reference and landing and whenever considered necessary, by reason 965/2012:NCC.OP.165 pt. the requirement is
3.4.2.9.4 of turbulence or any emergency occurring during flight, all (b).R.(EU) addressed to the
passengers on board an aeroplane are secured in their seats 2018/1139:Annex V: pt. 3. pilotin-command
by means of the seat belts or harnesses provided. (c)
Standard

14-December-2020 Page 135 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
3.4.3 Flight preparation R.(EU) No Difference Requirement c) not
Reference 965/2012:NCC.GEN.106 pt. specifically mentioned,
3.4.3.1 3.4.3.1 The operator shall develop procedures to ensure (a)(4).R.(EU) but is considered to be
that a flight is not commenced unless: 2018/1139:Annex V: pt. met if airworthiness
2.c; For c) – Annex V: pt. requirement in a) is
Standard a) the aeroplane is airworthy, duly registered and that 6.1.(d) complied with.
appropriate certificates with respect thereto are
aboard the aeroplane;

b) the instruments and equipment installed in the


aeroplane are appropriate, taking into account the
expected flight conditions;

c) any necessary maintenance has been performed in


accordance with Chapter 3.8;

d) the mass of the aeroplane and centre of gravity


location are such that the flight can be conducted
safely, taking into account the flight conditions
expected;

e) any load carried is properly distributed and safely


secured; and

f) the aeroplane operating limitations, contained in the


flight manual, or its equivalent, will not be exceeded.
Chapter 3
3.4.3.2 Recommendation.— The operator should make R.(EU) No Difference
Reference available sufficient information on climb performance with 965/2012:ORO.GEN.110
3.4.3.2 all engines operating to enable determination of the climb pt. (i);AMC3
gradient that can be achieved during the departure phase ORO.MLR.100 pt. (a),
for the existing take-off conditions and intended take-off Operations Manual Part B
Recommendation technique.

14-December-2020 Page 136 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
3.4.3.3 Operational flight planning R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.OP.145 pt.
3.4.3.3 The operator shall specify flight planning procedures to (b);GM1 NCC.OP.145(b)
provide for the safe conduct of the flight based on
considerations of aeroplane performance, other operating
Standard limitations and relevant expected conditions on the route to
be followed and at the aerodromes concerned. These
procedures shall be included in the operations manual.

Note 1.— It is the practice in some States to declare, for


flight planning purposes, higher minima for an aerodrome
nominated as an alternate, than for the same aerodrome
planned as that of intended landing.

Note 2.— The requirements for flight plans are


contained in Annex 2 — Rules of the Air and Procedures for
Air Navigation Services — Air Traffic Management
(PANS-ATM, Doc 4444).

Chapter 3
3.4.3.4 Alternate aerodromes R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.OP.150 pt.
3.4.3.4.1.1 3.4.3.4.1 Take-off alternate aerodrome (a)

3.4.3.4.1.1 A take-off alternate aerodrome shall be


Standard selected and specified in the flight plan if either the
meteorological conditions at the aerodrome of departure are
below the applicable aerodrome landing minima for that
operation or if it would not be possible to return to the
aerodrome of departure for other reasons.

14-December-2020 Page 137 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
3.4.3.4.1.2 The take-off alternate aerodrome shall be R.(EU) No Difference
Reference located within the following flight time from the aerodrome of 965/2012:NCC.OP.150 pt.
3.4.3.4.1.2 departure: (b)

a) for aeroplanes with two engines, one hour of flight


Standard time at a one-engine-inoperative cruising speed,
determined from the aircraft operating manual,
calculated in ISA and still-air conditions using the
actual take-off mass; or

b) for aeroplanes with three or more engines two hours


of flight time at an all engines operating cruising
speed, determined from the aircraft operating manual,
calculated in ISA and still-air conditions using the
actual take-off mass.
Chapter 3
3.4.3.4.1.3 For an aerodrome to be selected as a take-off R.(EU) No Difference
Reference alternate the available information shall indicate that, at the 965/2012:NCC.OP.150 pt.
3.4.3.4.1.3 estimated time of use, the conditions will be at or above the (c)
applicable aerodrome operating minima for that operation.

Standard

Chapter 3
3.4.3.5 Fuel requirements R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.OP.130.R.
3.4.3.5.1 3.4.3.5.1 An aeroplane shall carry a sufficient amount of (EU) 2018/1139:Annex V:
usable fuel to complete the planned flight safely and to allow pt. 2.g
for deviations from the planned operation.
Standard

14-December-2020 Page 138 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
3.4.3.5.2 The amount of usable fuel to be carried shall, R.(EU) Less protective Partially implemented.Fuel The European rules use a
Reference as a minimum, be based on: 965/2012:NCC.OP.130 or partially consumption data as performance-based
3.4.3.5.2 implemented or required in (a) is not condition to cover (b)(1),
a) fuel consumption data: not implemented in the EU (b)(2) and (b)(5): “any
implemented rules. other condition that may
Standard 1) provided by the aeroplane manufacturer; or increase fuel
consumption.”The fuel
2) if available, current aeroplane-specific data consumption data will be
derived from a fuel consumption monitoring introduced in the EU
system; and rules for NCC operations
through RMT.0573 ‘Fuel
b) the operating conditions for the planned flight planning and
including: management’ (Opinion
publication expected Q3
1) anticipated aeroplane mass; 2020).

2) Notices to Airmen;

3) current meteorological reports or a combination


of current reports and forecasts;

4) air traffic services procedures, restrictions and


anticipated delays; and

5) the effects of deferred maintenance items and/or


configuration deviations.

Note.— Where no specific fuel consumption data exist


for the precise conditions of the flight, the aircraft may be
operated in accordance with estimated fuel consumption
data.

14-December-2020 Page 139 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
3.4.3.5.3 The pre-flight calculation of usable fuel R.(EU) Different in Other means of
Reference required shall include: 965/2012:NCC.OP.105;NC character or compliance.European rules
3.4.3.5.3 C.OP.130 other means of do not break down the
a) taxi fuel, which shall be the amount of fuel expected compliance amount of fuel by phases of
to be consumed before take-off taking into account flight.
Standard local conditions at the departure aerodrome and
auxiliary power unit (APU) fuel consumption;

b) trip fuel, which shall be the amount of fuel required


to enable the aeroplane to fly from take-off until
landing at the destination aerodrome taking into
account the operating conditions of 3.4.3.5.2 b);

c) contingency fuel, which shall be the amount of fuel


required to compensate for unforeseen factors. It
shall be not less than five per cent of the planned trip
fuel;

Note.— Unforeseen factors are those which could


have an influence on the fuel consumption to the
destination aerodrome, such as deviations of an
individual aeroplane from the expected fuel
consumption data, deviations from forecast
meteorological conditions, extended delays and
deviations from planned routings and/or cruising levels.

d) destination alternate fuel, which shall be:

1) where a destination alternate aerodrome is


required, the amount of fuel required to enable
the aeroplane to:

i) perform a missed approach at the


destination aerodrome;

ii) climb to the expected cruising altitude;

14-December-2020 Page 140 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

iii) fly the expected routing;

iv) descend to the point where the expected


approach is initiated; and

v) conduct the approach and landing at the


destination alternate aerodrome; or

2) where a flight is operated without a destination


alternate aerodrome, the amount of fuel required
to enable the aeroplane to fly for 15 minutes at
holding speed at 450 m (1 500 ft) above
destination aerodrome elevation in standard
conditions; or

3) where the aerodrome of intended landing is an


isolated aerodrome:

i) for a reciprocating engine aeroplane, the


amount of fuel required to fly for 45 minutes
plus 15 per cent of the flight time planned to
be spent at cruising level, including final
reserve fuel, or two hours, whichever is
less; or

ii) for a turbine-engined aeroplane, the amount


of fuel required to fly for two hours at
normal cruise consumption above the
destination aerodrome, including final
reserve fuel;

e) final reserve fuel, which shall be the amount of fuel


on arrival at the destination alternate aerodrome, or
the destination aerodrome when no destination
alternate aerodrome is required:

1) for a reciprocating engine aeroplane, the amount

14-December-2020 Page 141 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

of fuel required to fly for 45 minutes; or

2) for a turbine-engined aeroplane, the amount of


fuel required to fly for 30 minutes at holding
speed at 450 m (1 500 ft) above aerodrome
elevation in standard conditions;

f) additional fuel, which shall be the supplementary


amount of fuel required to enable the aircraft to
descend as necessary and proceed to land at an
alternate aerodrome in the event of engine failure or
loss of pressurization based on the assumption that
such a failure occurs at the most critical point along
the route;
g) discretionary fuel, which shall be the extra amount of
fuel to be carried at the discretion of the
pilot-in-command.
Chapter 3
3.4.3.5.4 Recommendation.— Operators should R.(EU) More Exacting Reg.(EU) 965/2012
Reference determine one final reserve fuel value for each aeroplane 965/2012:NCC.OP.130 or Exceeds requires a mandatory
3.4.3.5.4 type and variant in their fleet rounded up to an easily final reserve fuel (FRF) of
recalled figure. 30 minutes (VFR by day)
or 45 minutes (VFR by
Recommendation night and IFR).

Chapter 3
3.4.3.5.5 The use of fuel after flight commencement for R.(EU) No Difference European rules allow
Reference purposes other than originally intended during pre-flight 965/2012:NCC.OP.130 pt. replanning provided all
3.4.3.5.5 planning shall require a re-analysis and, if applicable, (c) requirements are
adjustment of the planned operation. complied with.

Standard Note.— Nothing in 3.4.3.5 precludes the in-flight


amendment of a flight plan to re-plan that flight to another
aerodrome, provided that the requirements of 3.4.3.5 can be
complied with from the point where the flight is re-planned.

14-December-2020 Page 142 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
3.4.3.6 In-flight fuel management R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.OP.205 pt.
3.4.3.6.1 3.4.3.6.1 The operator shall establish policies and (a)
procedures to ensure that in-flight fuel checks and fuel
management are performed.
Standard

Chapter 3
3.4.3.6.2 The pilot-in-command shall continually ensure R.(EU) Different in Other means of compliance.
Reference that the amount of usable fuel remaining on board is not less 965/2012:NCC.OP.205 pt. character or Part-NCC does not define
3.4.3.6.2 than the fuel required to proceed to an aerodrome where a (b) other means of final reserve fuel as such.
safe landing can be made with the planned final reserve fuel compliance Instead NCC.OP.130 gives
remaining upon landing. the amount of minutes for
Standard the required final reserve
Note.— The protection of final reserve fuel is intended to fuel.
ensure a safe landing at any aerodrome when unforeseen
occurrences may not permit safe completion of an operation
as originally planned. Guidance on flight planning
including the circumstances that may require re-analysis,
adjustment and/or re-planning of the planned operation
before take-off or en-route, is contained in the Flight
Planning and Fuel Management (FPFM) Manual (Doc 9976).
Chapter 3
3.4.3.6.3 The pilot-in-command shall request delay R.(EU) Less protective Partially implemented with The Standard will be
Reference information from ATC when unanticipated circumstances may 923/2012:SERA.11012 or partially the SERA requirements transposed into
3.4.3.6.3 result in landing at the destination aerodrome with less than implemented or Regulation (EU) 965/2012
the final reserve fuel plus any fuel required to proceed to an not through RMT.0573.
alternate aerodrome or the fuel required to operate to an implemented
Standard isolated aerodrome.

14-December-2020 Page 143 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
3.4.3.6.4 The pilot-in-command shall advise ATC of a R.(EU) 923/2012:Art. 2 Less protective Partially implemented with The phraseology is
Reference minimum fuel state by declaring MINIMUM FUEL when, Definitions or partially the SERA requirements. addressed in a Safety
3.4.3.6.4 having committed to land at a specific aerodrome, the pilot (94a);SERA.11012;SERA implemented or SERA includes the Information Bulletin (SIB
calculates that any change to the existing clearance to that Appendix I to AMC1 not declaration of MINIMUM 2018-08) and applicable
aerodrome may result in landing with less than the planned SERA.14001 implemented FUEL. to all types of operation.
Standard final reserve fuel. The standard will be
transposed through
Note.— The declaration of MINIMUM FUEL informs RMT.0573 also in the
ATC that all planned aerodrome options have been reduced OPS rules.
to a specific aerodrome of intended landing and any change
to the existing clearance may result in landing with less than
the planned final reserve fuel. This is not an emergency
situation but an indication that an emergency situation is
possible should any additional delay occur.
Chapter 3
3.4.3.6.5 The pilot-in-command shall declare a situation R.(EU) 923/2012:Art. 2 Less protective Partially implemented with The standard will be
Reference of fuel emergency by broadcasting MAYDAY MAYDAY Definitions or partially the SERA requirements. transposed into
3.4.3.6.5 MAYDAY FUEL when the calculated usable fuel estimated to (94a);SERA.11012;SERA implemented or Regulation (EU) 965/2012
be available upon landing at the nearest aerodrome where a Appendix I to AMC1 not through RMT.0573.
safe landing can be made is less than the planned final reserve SERA.14001 implemented
Standard fuel.

Note 1.— The planned final reserve fuel refers to the


value calculated in 3.4.3.5.3 e) and is the minimum amount
of fuel required upon landing at any aerodrome.

Note 2.— The words “MAYDAY FUEL” describe the


nature of the distress conditions as required in Annex 10,
Volume II, 5.3.2.1.1, b) 3).

14-December-2020 Page 144 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
3.4.3.7 Additional requirements for operations beyond 60 Less protective Not implemented.
Reference minutes or partially Part-NCC does not
3.4.3.7.1 to an en-route alternate aerodrome implemented or provide such a
not requirement.
Recommendation. — When conducting operations implemented
Recommendation beyond 60 minutes from a point on a route to an en-route
alternate aerodrome operators should ensure that:

a) en-route alternate aerodromes are identified; and

b) the pilot-in-command has access to current


information on the identified en-route alternate
aerodromes, including operational status and
meteorological conditions.

Chapter 3
3.4.3.8 Refuelling with passengers on board R.(EU) More Exacting EU rules do not allow
Reference 965/2012:NCC.OP.155;A or Exceeds embarking, on board or
3.4.3.8.1 3.4.3.8.1 An aeroplane shall not be refuelled when MC1 NCC.OP.155 disembarking of passengers
passengers are embarking, on board or disembarking unless it while refuelling with AVGAS
is properly attended by qualified personnel ready to initiate or wide-cut type fuel or a
Standard and direct an evacuation of the aeroplane by the most mixture of these fuel types.
practical and expeditious means available.

14-December-2020 Page 145 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
3.4.3.8.2 When refuelling with passengers embarking, R.(EU) No Difference
Reference on board or disembarking, two-way communication shall be 965/2012:NCC.OP.155 pt.
3.4.3.8.2 maintained by the aeroplane’s intercommunication system or (c);AMC1 NCC.OP.155 (c)
other suitable means between the ground crew supervising
the refuelling and the qualified personnel on board the
Standard aeroplane.

Note 1.— The provisions of 3.4.3.5.1 do not necessarily


require the deployment of integral aeroplane stairs or the
opening of emergency exits as a prerequisite to refuelling.

Note 2.— Provisions concerning aircraft refuelling are


contained in Annex 14, Volume I, and guidance on safe
refuelling practices is contained in the Airport Services
Manual (Doc 9137), Parts 1 and 8.

Note 3.— Additional precautions are required when


refuelling with fuels other than aviation kerosene or when
refuelling results in a mixture of aviation kerosene with
other aviation turbine fuels, or when an open line is used.

Chapter 3
3.4.3.9 Oxygen supply R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.195;
3.4.3.9.1 3.4.3.9.1 A flight to be operated at flight altitudes at NCC.IDE.A.200
which the atmospheric pressure in personnel compartments
will be less than 700 hPa shall not be commenced unless
Standard sufficient stored breathing oxygen is carried to supply:

a) all crew members and 10 per cent of the passengers


for any period in excess of 30 minutes that the
pressure in compartments occupied by them will be
between 700 hPa and 620 hPa; and

b) the crew and passengers for any period that the


atmospheric pressure in compartments occupied by
them will be less than 620 hPa.

14-December-2020 Page 146 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
3.4.3.9.2 A flight to be operated with a pressurized R.(EU) No Difference
Reference aeroplane shall not be commenced unless a sufficient quantity 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.195;
3.4.3.9.2 of stored breathing oxygen is carried to supply all the crew
members and passengers, as is appropriate to the
circumstances of the flight being undertaken, in the event of
Standard loss of pressurization, for any period that the atmospheric
pressure in any compartment occupied by them would be less
than 700 hPa. In addition, when an aeroplane is operated at
flight altitudes at which the atmospheric pressure is less than
376 hPa, or which, if operated at flight altitudes at which the
atmospheric pressure is more than 376 hPa and cannot
descend safely within four minutes to a flight altitude at which
the atmospheric pressure is equal to 620 hPa, there shall be no
less than a 10-minute supply for the occupants of the
passenger compartment.

Chapter 3
3.4.4 In-flight procedures R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:ORO.MLR.100
3.4.4.1.1 pt. (d);AMC2
3.4.4.1 Instrument approaches ORO.MLR.100 (g)&(o).R.
(EU) 2018/1139:Annex V:
Recommendation Recommendation.— In the aircraft operating manual pt. 8.2
recommended in 3.6.1.2 the operator should include
operating procedures for conducting instrument
approaches.

Chapter 3
3.4.4.2 Use of oxygen R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.OP.210
3.4.4.2.1 3.4.4.2.1 All flight crew members, when engaged in
performing duties essential to the safe operation of an
aeroplane in flight, shall use breathing oxygen continuously
Standard whenever the circumstances prevail for which its supply has
been required in 3.4.3.9.1 or 3.4.3.9.2.

14-December-2020 Page 147 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
3.4.4.2.2 All flight crew members of pressurized R.(EU) No Difference
Reference aeroplanes operating above an altitude where the atmospheric 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.195
3.4.4.2.2 pressure is less than 376 hPa shall have available at the flight pt. (c)(2)
duty station a quick-donning type of oxygen mask which will
readily supply oxygen upon demand.
Standard

Chapter 3
3.4.4.3 Aeroplane operating procedures for noise abatement R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.OP.120;A
3.4.4.3.1 3.4.4.3.1 Recommendation.— Aeroplane operating MC1 NCC.OP.120 (a)
procedures for noise abatement should comply with the
provisions of PANS-OPS (Doc 8168), Volume I.
Recommendation

Chapter 3
3.4.4.3.2 Recommendation.— Noise abatement R.(EU) No Difference
Reference procedures specified by the operator for any one aeroplane 965/2012:NCC.OP.120 pt.
3.4.4.3.2 type should be the same for all aerodromes. (a)AMC1 NCC.OP.120
(a).R.(EU)
Note.— A single procedure may not satisfy the 1332/2011:AUR.ACAS.10
Recommendation requirements at some aerodromes. 10.

14-December-2020 Page 148 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
3.4.4.4 Aeroplane operating procedures for R.(EU) No Difference
Reference rates of climb and descent 965/2012:NCC.OP.220;GM
3.4.4.4.1 1
Recommendation.— Unless otherwise specified in an air NCO.OP.220;NCO.OP.200
traffic control instruction, to avoid unnecessary airborne R.(EU)
Recommendation collision avoidance system (ACAS II) resolution advisories 1332/2011:AUR.ACAS.20
in aircraft at or approaching adjacent altitudes or flight 10
levels, pilots should consider using appropriate procedures
to ensure that a rate of climb or descent of less than 8 m/s or
1 500 ft/min (depending on the instrumentation available) is
achieved throughout the last 300 m (1 000 ft) of climb or
descent to the assigned altitude or flight level, when made
aware of another aircraft at or approaching an adjacent
altitude or flight level.

Note.— Material concerning the development of these


procedures is contained in PANS-OPS (Doc 8168), Volume I,
Part III, Section 3, Chapter 3.

14-December-2020 Page 149 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
3.4.4.5 Aeroplane operating procedures for landing R.(EU) No Difference
Reference performance 965/2012:NCC.OP.225;A
3.4.4.5 (As of 5 November 2020) MC1
NCC.OP.225;NCO.OP.205;
An approach to land shall not be continued below 300 m (1 AMC1 NCO.OP.205.
Standard 000 ft) above aerodrome elevation unless the
pilot-in-command is satisfied that, with the runway surface
condition information available, the aeroplane performance
information indicates that a safe landing can be made.

Note 1.— The procedures for using runway surface


condition information on board aircraft are contained in the
PANS-Aerodromes (Doc 9981) and in the performance
section of the aeroplane flight manual; for aeroplanes
certificated in accordance with Annex 8, Part IIIB, in the
Aeroplane Performance Manual (Doc 10064).

Note 2.— Guidance on development of aeroplane


performance information for aeroplanes certificated in
accordance with Annex 8, Part IIIB is contained in the
Aeroplane Performance Manual (Doc 10064).

Chapter 3
3.4.5 Duties of pilot-in-command R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.GEN.106 pt.
3.4.5.1 3.4.5.1 The pilot-in-command shall ensure that the (a)(3)
checklists specified in 3.4.2.5 are complied with in detail.

Standard

14-December-2020 Page 150 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
3.4.5.2 The pilot-in-command shall be responsible for R.(EU) No Difference
Reference notifying the nearest appropriate authority by the quickest 965/2012:NCC.GEN.106 pt.
3.4.5.2 available means of any accident involving the aeroplane, (g).R.(EU) 996/2010:Art. 2:
resulting in serious injury or death of any person or Def. (17).
substantial damage to the aeroplane or property. In the event
Standard that the pilot-in-command is incapacitated the operator shall
take the forgoing action.
Note.— A definition of the term “serious injury” is
contained in Annex 13.
Chapter 3
3.4.5.3 The pilot-in-command shall be responsible for R.(EU) No Difference
Reference reporting all known or suspected defects in the aeroplane, to 965/2012:NCC.GEN.106 pt.
3.4.5.3 the operator, at the termination of the flight. (a)(8)

Standard

Chapter 3
3.4.5.4 The pilot-in-command shall be responsible for R.(EU) No Difference
Reference the journey log book or the general declaration containing the 965/2012:ORO.MLR.110;N
3.4.5.4 information listed in 2.8.2. CC.GEN.140 pt. (a)
(9);AMC1
Note.— By virtue of Resolution A10-36 of the Tenth ORO.MLR.110..
Standard Session of the Assembly (Caracas, June–July 1956) “the
General Declaration, [described in Annex 9] when prepared
so as to contain all the information required by Article 34
[of the Convention on International Civil Aviation] with
respect to the journey log book, may be considered by
Contracting States to be an acceptable form of journey log
book”.

14-December-2020 Page 151 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
3.4.6 Cabin baggage (take-off and landing) R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.GEN.106 pt.
3.4.6 The operator shall specify procedures to ensure that all (a)(4)
baggage carried onto an aeroplane and taken into the
passenger cabin is adequately and securely stowed.
Standard

Chapter 3
Not within the scope of Not Applicable Not implemented.To be
CHAPTER 3.5 AEROPLANE
Reference EU rules filled out by the National
3.5.1.0.1 PERFORMANCE authority for reference:
Reg. (EU) No 965/2012
OPERATING LIMITATIONS
Art. 1
Recommendation

3.5.1 General

Recommendation.— For aeroplanes for which Parts IIIA


and IIIB of Annex 8 are not applicable because of the
exemption provided for in Article 41 of the Convention, the
State of Registry should ensure that the level of performance
specified in 3.5.2 should be met as far as practicable.

14-December-2020 Page 152 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
3.5.2 Applicable to aeroplanes certificated in accordance R.(EU) 965/2012:Art. 1 No Difference
Reference with and Art. 5(3)
3.5.2.1 Parts IIIA and IIIB of Annex 8

3.5.2.1 The Standards contained in 3.5.2.2 to 3.5.2.9


Standard inclusive are applicable to the aeroplanes to which Parts IIIA
and IIIB of Annex 8 are applicable.

Note.— The Standards of Annex 8 — Airworthiness of


Aircraft, Parts IIIA and IIIB, apply to all aeroplanes of over 5
700 kg maximum certificated take-off mass intended for the
carriage of passengers or cargo or mail in international air
navigation.
Chapter 3
3.5.2.2 An aeroplane shall be operated in compliance R.(EU) 2018/1139:Annex No Difference
Reference with the terms of its certificate of airworthiness and within the V: pt. 4.1
3.5.2.2 approved operating limitations contained in its flight manual.

Standard

Chapter 3
3.5.2.3 The State of Registry shall take such precautions R.(EU) 2018/1139:Annex Different in Different in characterFor
Reference as are reasonably possible to ensure that the general level of V: pt. 4.1.R.(EU) character or NCC operators, the State of
3.5.2.3 safety contemplated by these provisions is maintained under 965/2012:NCC.POL.115 other means of Operator establishes the
all expected operating conditions, including those not compliance criteria instead of the State
covered specifically by the provisions of this chapter. of Registry.
Standard

Chapter 3
3.5.2.4 A flight shall not be commenced unless the R.(EU) 2018/1139:Annex No Difference
Reference performance information provided in the flight manual V: pt. 4.4.R.(EU)
3.5.2.4 indicates that the Standards of 3.5.2.5 to 3.5.2.9 can be 965/2012:NCC.GEN.106 pt.
complied with for the flight to be undertaken. (a)(4)(vi)

Standard

14-December-2020 Page 153 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
3.5.2.5 Until 4 November 2020, in applying the R.(EU) 2018/1139:Annex No Difference
Reference Standards of this chapter, account shall be taken of all factors V: pt. 4.5.R.(EU)
3.5.2.5 that significantly affect the performance of the aeroplane 965/2012:NCC.GEN.106 pt.
(such as: mass, operating procedures, the pressure altitude (a)(4)(vi);AMC1
appropriate to the elevation of the aerodrome, temperature, NCC.POL.125
Standard wind, runway gradient and condition of runway, i.e. presence
of slush, water and/or ice, for landplanes, water surface
condition for seaplanes). Such factors shall be taken into
account directly as operational parameters or indirectly by
means of allowances or margins, which may be provided in
the scheduling of performance data or in the comprehensive
and detailed code of performance in accordance with which
the aeroplane is being operated.
Chapter 3
3.5.2.5 As of 5 November 2020, in applying the R.(EU) 2018/1139:Annex No Difference
Reference Standards of this chapter, account shall be taken of all factors V: pt. 4.5.R.(EU)
3.5.2.5 that significantly affect the performance of the aeroplane 965/2012:NCC.GEN.106 pt.
(such as: mass, operating procedures, the pressure altitude (a)(4)(vi);AMC1
appropriate to the elevation of the aerodrome, runway slope, NCC.POL.125
Standard the ambient temperature, wind, and surface conditions of the
runway at the expected time of use, i.e. presence of slush,
water and/or ice, for landplanes, water surface condition for
seaplanes). Such factors shall be taken into account directly
as operational parameters or indirectly by means of
allowances or margins, which may be provided in the
scheduling of performance data or in the comprehensive and
detailed code of performance in accordance with which the
aeroplane is being operated.

Note.— As of 5 November 2020, guidelines for using


runway surface condition information on board aircraft in
accordance with 2.2.4.4 are contained in the
PANS-Aerodromes (Doc 9981) and in the Aeroplane
Performance Manual (Doc 10064).

14-December-2020 Page 154 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
3.5.2.6 Mass limitations R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.POL.105;N
3.5.2.6 a) The mass of the aeroplane at the start of take-off CC.POL.110;NCC.POL.120
shall not exceed the mass at which 3.5.2.7 is complied pt. (b)
with, or the mass at which 3.5.2.8 and 3.5.2.9 are
Standard complied with, allowing for expected reductions in
mass as the flight proceeds, and for such fuel
jettisoning as is envisaged in applying 3.5.2.8 and
3.5.2.9 and, in respect of alternate aerodromes, 3.5.2.6
c) and 3.5.2.9.

b) In no case shall the mass at the start of take-off


exceed the maximum take-off mass specified in the
flight manual for the pressure altitude appropriate to
the elevation of the aerodrome, and if used as a
parameter to determine the maximum take-off mass,
any other local atmospheric condition.

c) In no case shall the estimated mass for the expected


time of landing at the aerodrome of intended landing
and at any destination alternate aerodrome, exceed
the maximum landing mass specified in the flight
manual for the pressure altitude appropriate to the
elevation of those aerodromes, and if used as a
parameter to determine the maximum landing mass,
any other local atmospheric condition.

d) In no case shall the mass at the start of take-off, or at


the expected time of landing at the aerodrome of
intended landing and at any destination alternate
aerodrome, exceed the relevant maximum masses at
which compliance has been demonstrated with the
applicable noise certification Standards in Annex 16,
Volume I, unless otherwise authorized in exceptional
circumstances for a certain aerodrome or a runway
where there is no noise disturbance problem, by the
competent authority of the State in which the

14-December-2020 Page 155 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

aerodrome is situated.
Chapter 3
3.5.2.7 Take-off. The aeroplane shall be able, in the R.(EU) No Difference
Reference event of a critical engine failing at any point in the take-off, 965/2012:NCC.POL.125 pt.
3.5.2.7 either to discontinue the take-off and stop within either the (b);
accelerate-stop distance available or the runway available, or
to continue the take-off and clear all obstacles along the flight
Standard path by an adequate margin until the aeroplane is in a position
to comply with 3.5.2.8.

Note.— Until 4 November 2020, “An adequate margin”


referred to in this provision is illustrated by the appropriate
examples included in Attachment B to Annex 6, Part I.

Note.— As of 5 November 2020, “An adequate margin”


referred to in this provision is illustrated by the appropriate
examples included in the Aeroplane Performance Manual
(Doc 10064).
Chapter 3
3.5.2.7.1 In determining the length of the runway R.(EU) No Difference
Reference available, account shall be taken of the loss, if any, of runway 965/2012:NCC.POL.125;A
3.5.2.7.1 length due to alignment of the aeroplane prior to take-off. MC1 NCC.POL.125 (f)

Standard

Chapter 3
3.5.2.8 En route — one engine inoperative. The R.(EU) No Difference
Reference aeroplane shall be able, in the event of the critical engine 965/2012:NCC.POL.130
3.5.2.8 becoming inoperative at any point along the route or planned
diversions therefrom, to continue the flight to an aerodrome at
which the Standard of 3.5.2.9 can be met, without flying below
Standard the minimum obstacle clearance altitude at any point.

14-December-2020 Page 156 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
3.5.2.9 Landing. The aeroplane shall, at the aerodrome R.(EU) No Difference
Reference of intended landing and at any alternate aerodrome, after 965/2012:NCC.POL.135
3.5.2.9 clearing all obstacles in the approach path by a safe margin,
be able to land, with assurance that it can come to a stop or,
for a seaplane, to a satisfactorily low speed, within the landing
Standard distance available. Allowance shall be made for expected
variations in the approach and landing techniques, if such
allowance has not been made in the scheduling of
performance data.

Note.— As of 5 November 2020, guidance on


appropriate margins for the “at time of landing assessment”
are contained in the Aeroplane Performance Manual (Doc
10064).

14-December-2020 Page 157 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
CHAPTER 3.6 AEROPLANE R.(EU) 2018/1139:Art. 30: Different in Different in character In the
Reference pt. 5(c).R.(EU) character or EU system, the State of
3.6.1.1 INSTRUMENTS, EQUIPMENT 965/2012:ORO.MLR.105; other means of Operator is responsible for
AND FLIGHT DOCUMENTS AMC1 compliance approving the MEL.
ORO.MLR.100;AMC2
Standard ORO.MLR.100

Note.— Specifications for the provision of aeroplane


communication and navigation equipment are contained in
Chapter 3.7.

3.6.1 General

3.6.1.1 Where a master minimum equipment list (MMEL)


is established for the aircraft type, the operator shall include
in the operations manual a minimum equipment list (MEL)
approved by the State of Registry of the aeroplane which will
enable the pilot-in-command to determine whether a flight may
be commenced or continued from any intermediate stop
should any instrument, equipment or systems become
inoperative.

Note.— Attachment 3.B contains guidance on the


minimum equipment list.

14-December-2020 Page 158 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
3.6.1.2 Recommendation.— The operator should R. (EU) No Difference
Reference provide operations staff and flight crew with an aircraft 965/2012:ORO.MLR.100
3.6.1.2 operating manual, for each aircraft type operated, pt. (f) and (k);AMC2
containing the normal, abnormal and emergency procedures ORO.MLR.100
relating to the operation of the aircraft. The manual should
Recommendation be consistent with the aircraft flight manual and checklists
to be used. The design of the manual should observe Human
Factors principles.

Note.— Guidance material on the application of Human


Factors principles can be found in the Human Factors
Training Manual (Doc 9683).

14-December-2020 Page 159 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
3.6.2 Aeroplanes on all flights R.(EU) 965/2012:For a) No Difference
Reference and b):
3.6.2.1 3.6.2.1 In addition to the requirements contained in NCC.IDE.A.190;AMC1
2.4.2.2, an aeroplane shall be equipped with: NCC.IDE.A.190 (a),
(b);For c) and d):
Standard a) accessible and adequate medical supplies NCC.IDE.A.180 pt. (a)(5)
appropriate to the number of passengers the and (b); For
aeroplane is authorized to carry; e):NCC.OP.140 pt. (a) &
(b)
b) Recommendation.— Medical supplies should
comprise one or more first-aid kits.

Note.— Guidance on the types, number, location


and contents of the medical supplies is given in Attachment
A to Annex 6, Part I.

c) a safety harness for each flight crew seat. The safety


harness for each pilot seat shall incorporate a device
which will automatically restrain the occupant’s
torso in the event of rapid deceleration;

d) Recommendation.— The safety harness for each


pilot seat should incorporate a device to prevent a
suddenly incapacitated pilot from interfering with
the flight controls.

Note.— Safety harness includes shoulder straps and


a seat belt which may be used independently.

e) means of ensuring that the following information and


instructions are conveyed to passengers:

1) when seat belts are to be fastened;

2) when and how oxygen equipment is to be used


if the carriage of oxygen is required;

14-December-2020 Page 160 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

3) restrictions on smoking;

4) location and use of life jackets or equivalent


individual flotation devices where their carriage
is required;

5) location of emergency equipment; and

6) location and method of opening emergency


exits.
Chapter 3
3.6.2.2 An aeroplane shall carry: R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.GEN.140 pt.
3.6.2.2 a) the operations manual prescribed in 3.4.2.2, or those (a), (b)
parts of it that pertain to flight operations;

Standard b) the flight manual for the aeroplane, or other


documents containing performance data required for
the application of Chapter 3.5 and any other
information necessary for the operation of the
aeroplane within the terms of its certificate of
airworthiness, unless these data are available in the
operations manual; and

c) the checklists to which 3.4.2.5 refers.

14-December-2020 Page 161 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
3.6.3 Flight recorders R.(EU) Less protective Partially
Reference 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.165 or partially implemented.Carriage of a
3.6.3.1.1.1 pt. (a) and (b) for the implemented or flight data recorder is
3.6.3.1 Flight data recorders carriage requirement and not required only for aeroplanes
the flight parameters to be implemented first issued with an
Standard 3.6.3.1.1 Applicability recorded;AMC1 individual CofA on or after
NCC.IDE.A.165 for the 1 January 2016.
3.6.3.1.1.1 All aeroplanes of a maximum certificated detailed list of flight
take-off mass of over 5 700 kg for which the individual parameters to record
certificate of airworthiness is first issued on or after 1 January
2005 shall be equipped with an FDR which shall record at least
78 parameters listed in Table A2.3-1 of Appendix 2.3.
Chapter 3
3.6.3.1.1.2 All aeroplanes of a maximum certificated R.(EU) Less protective Partially
Reference take-off mass of over 27 000 kg for which the individual 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.165 or partially implementedCarriage of a
3.6.3.1.1.2 certificate of airworthiness is first issued on or after 1 January pt. (a) implemented or flight data recorder is
1989 shall be equipped with an FDR which shall record at least not required only for aeroplanes
the first 32 parameters listed in Table A2.3-1 of Appendix 2.3. implemented first issued with an
Standard individual CofA on or after
1 January 2016.
Chapter 3
3.6.3.1.1.3 Recommendation.— All aeroplanes of a R.(EU) Less protective Partially
Reference maximum certificated take-off mass of over 5 700 kg, up to 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.165 or partially implemented.Carriage of
3.6.3.1.1.3 and including 27 000 kg, for which the individual certificate pt. (a) implemented or a flight data recorder is
of airworthiness is first issued on or after 1 January 1989, not required only for
should be equipped with an FDR which should record at implemented aeroplanes first issued
Recommendation least the first 16 parameters listed in Table A2.3-1 of with an individual CofA
Appendix 2.3. on or after 1 January
2016.

14-December-2020 Page 162 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
3.6.3.2 Cockpit voice recorders R.(EU) More Exacting NCC.IDE.A.160 (a)(2) is
Reference 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.160 or Exceeds applicable to aeroplanes for
3.6.3.2.1.1 3.6.3.2.1 Applicability pt. (a)(2) which the type certificate is
issued after 1 January 2016,
3.6.3.2.1.1 All turbine-engined aeroplanes of a maximum while 3.6.3.2.1 criterion is
Standard certificated take-off mass of over 5 700 kg for which the the date of submission of
application for type certification is submitted to a Contracting the application for a type
State on or after 1 January 2016 and required to be operated certificate.
by more than one pilot shall be equipped with a CVR.
Chapter 3
3.6.3.2.1.2 All aeroplanes of a maximum certificated R.(EU) Less protective Partially
Reference take-off mass of over 27 000 kg for which the individual 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.160 or partially implemented.NCC.IDE.A.16
3.6.3.2.1.2 certificate of airworthiness is first issued on or after 1 January pt. (a)(1) implemented or 0(a)(1) only requires a CVR
1987 shall be equipped with a CVR. not for aeroplanes above 27 000
implemented kg MCTOM which were
Standard first issued with an
individual CofA on or after
1 Jan 2016.
Chapter 3
3.6.3.2.1.3 Recommendation.— All aeroplanes of a R.(EU) Less protective Partially
Reference maximum certificated take-off mass of over 5 700 kg, up to 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.160 or partially implemented.NCC.IDE.A.
3.6.3.2.1.3 and including 27 000 kg, for which the individual certificate pt. (a) implemented or 160(a)(1) and (2) only
of airworthiness is first issued on or after 1 January 1987, not requires a CVR for
should be equipped with a CVR. implemented aeroplanes that were first
Recommendation issued with an individual
CofA on or after 1 Jan
2016 (see (a)(1)) or for
which a type certificate
was first issued on or
after 1 Jan 2016 (see (a)
(2)).

14-December-2020 Page 163 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
3.6.3.2.2 Duration R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.160
3.6.3.2.2.1 3.6.3.2.2.1 All aeroplanes of a maximum certificated pt. (b)(1)
take-off mass of over 27 000 kg for which the individual
certificate of airworthiness is first issued on or after 1 January
Standard 2021 shall be equipped with a CVR capable of retaining the
information recorded during at least the last 25 hours of its
operation.

Chapter 3
3.6.3.3 Combination recorders R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.175
3.6.3.3.0.1 Recommendation.— All aeroplanes of a maximum pt. (b)
certificated take-off mass over 5 700 kg, required to be
equipped with an FDR and a CVR, may alternatively be
Recommendation equipped with two combination recorders (FDR/CVR).

14-December-2020 Page 164 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
3.6.3.4 Aeroplanes on long-range over-water flights R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.220
3.6.3.4.1 3.6.3.4.1 The operator of an aeroplane operated on an pt. (a), (d);AMC1
extended flight over water shall determine the risks to survival NCC.IDE.A.220;AMC2
of the occupants of the aeroplane in the event of a ditching. NCC.IDE.A.220.
Standard The operator shall take into account the operating
environment and conditions such as, but not limited to, sea
state and sea and air temperatures, the distance from land
suitable for making an emergency landing, and the availability
of search and rescue facilities. Based upon the assessment of
these risks, the operator shall, in addition to the equipment
required in 2.4.4.3, ensure that the aeroplane is appropriately
equipped with:

a) life-saving rafts in sufficient numbers to carry all


persons on board, stowed so as to facilitate their
ready use in emergency, provided with such
lifesaving equipment, including means of sustaining
life, as is appropriate to the flight to be undertaken;
and

b) equipment for making the distress signals described


in Annex 2.
Chapter 3
3.6.3.4.2 Each life jacket and equivalent individual R.(EU) No Difference
Reference flotation device, when carried in accordance with 2.4.4.3, shall 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.220
3.6.3.4.2 be equipped with a means of electric illumination for the pt. (b);AMC1
purpose of facilitating the location of persons, except where NCC.IDE.A.220.
the requirement of 2.4.4.3.1 is met by the provision of
Standard individual flotation devices other than life jackets.

14-December-2020 Page 165 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
3.6.3.5 Aeroplanes for which the individual certificate of R.(EU) No Difference
Reference airworthiness 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.195
3.6.3.5.1 was first issued before 1 January 1990 pt. (c)

3.6.3.5.1 Pressurized aeroplanes intended to be operated


Standard at flight altitudes at which the atmospheric pressure is less
than 376 hPa shall be equipped with a device to provide
positive warning to the flight crew of any dangerous loss of
pressurization.
Chapter 3
3.6.3.5.2 An aeroplane intended to be operated at flight R.(EU) No Difference
Reference altitudes at which the atmospheric pressure is less than 700 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.200
3.6.3.5.2 hPa in personnel compartments shall be equipped with
oxygen storage and dispensing apparatus capable of storing
and dispensing the oxygen supplies required in 3.4.3.9.1.
Standard

Chapter 3
3.6.3.5.3 An aeroplane intended to be operated at flight R.(EU) No Difference
Reference altitudes at which the atmospheric pressure is less than 700 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.195
3.6.3.5.3 hPa but which is provided with means of maintaining pt. (a), (b)
pressures greater than 700 hPa in personnel compartments
shall be provided with oxygen storage and dispensing
Standard apparatus capable of storing and dispensing the oxygen
supplies required in 3.4.3.9.2.

Chapter 3
3.6.4 Aeroplanes in icing conditions R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.125
3.6.4 Aeroplanes shall be equipped with suitable de-icing and/or pt. (d);AMC1
anti-icing devices when operated in circumstances in which NCC.IDE.A.125(d).R.(EU)
icing conditions are reported to exist or are expected to be 2018/1139:Annex V: pt.
Standard encountered. 5.1, 5.2.

14-December-2020 Page 166 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
3.6.5 Aeroplanes operated in accordance with R.(EU) 965/2012:AMC1 No Difference
Reference the instrument flight rules NCC.IDE.A.120(c);NCC.I
3.6.5.1 DE.A.125 pt. (g)
3.6.5.1 In addition to the requirements contained in
2.4.7, aeroplanes when operated in accordance with the
Standard instrument flight rules, or when the aeroplane cannot be
maintained in a desired attitude without reference to one or
more flight instruments, shall be equipped with two
independent altitude measuring and display systems.

Chapter 3
3.6.5.2 Aeroplanes over 5 700 kg — Emergency power R.(EU) No Difference
Reference supply for 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.125
3.6.5.2.1 electrically operated attitude indicating instruments pt. (h)

3.6.5.2.1 Aeroplanes of a maximum certificated take-off


Standard mass of over 5 700 kg newly introduced into service after 1
January 1975 shall be fitted with an emergency power supply,
independent of the main electrical generating system, for the
purpose of operating and illuminating, for a minimum period of
30 minutes, an attitude indicating instrument (artificial
horizon), clearly visible to the pilot-in-command. The
emergency power supply shall be automatically operative
after the total failure of the main electrical generating system
and clear indication shall be given on the instrument panel
that the attitude indicator(s) is being operated by emergency
power.
Chapter 3
3.6.5.2.2 Recommendation.— Aircraft with advanced R.(EU) 965/2012:AMC1 No Difference
Reference cockpit automation systems (glass cockpits) should have NCC.IDE.A.120;NCC.IDE.
3.6.5.2.2 system redundancy that provides the flight crew with A.125 pt. (b)
attitude, heading, airspeed and altitude indications in case
of failure of the primary system or display.
Recommendation

14-December-2020 Page 167 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
3.6.5.2.3 Instruments that are used by any one pilot R.(EU) No Difference
Reference shall be so arranged as to permit the pilot to see their 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.100
3.6.5.2.3 indications readily from his or her station, with the minimum pt. (e)
practicable deviation from the position and line of vision
normally assumed when looking forward along the flight path.
Standard

Chapter 3
3.6.6 Pressurized aeroplanes when carrying passengers — R.(EU) No Difference
Reference weather-detecting equipment 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.145
3.6.6
Pressurized aeroplanes when carrying passengers shall be
equipped with operative weather-detecting equipment capable
Standard of detecting thunderstorms whenever such aeroplanes are
being operated in areas where such conditions may be
expected to exist along the route either at night or under
instrument meteorological conditions.

Chapter 3
3.6.7 Aeroplanes operated above 15 000 m (49 000 ft) — Council Directive Different in Other means of
Reference radiation indicator 2013/59/EURATOM:.Art character or compliance. This matter
3.6.7.0.2 35 pt. 3. other means of is addressed by a
Recommendation.— Aeroplanes intended to be compliance different legal instrument,
primarily operated above 15 000 m (49 000 ft) should carry which requires Member
Recommendation equipment to measure and indicate continuously the dose States to undertake
rate of total cosmic radiation being received (i.e. the total of appropriate measures
ionizing and neutron radiation of galactic and solar origin ) where the effective dose
and the cumulative dose on each flight. The display unit of to the crew is liable to be
the equipment shall be readily visible to a flight crew above1 mSv/year.
member.

Note.— The equipment is calibrated on the basis of


assumptions acceptable to the appropriate national
authorities.

14-December-2020 Page 168 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
3.6.8 Aeroplanes carrying passengers — cabin crew seats R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.180
3.6.8.1 pt. (a)(5);AMC3
3.6.8.1 Aeroplanes for which the individual certificate of NCC.IDE.A.180
airworthiness
Standard is first issued on or after 1 January 1981

Aeroplanes shall be equipped with a forward or rearward


facing seat (within 15 degrees of the longitudinal axis of the
aeroplane), fitted with a safety harness for the use of each
cabin crew member required to satisfy the intent of 3.12.1 in
respect of emergency evacuation.

Chapter 3
3.6.8.2 Aeroplanes for which the individual certificate of R.(EU) Less protective Partially
Reference airworthiness 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.180 or partially implemented.The
3.6.8.2.1 was first issued before 1 January 1981 pt. (a)(5);NCC.IDE.A.180 implemented or European regulatory
pt. (b);AMC3 not system only requires it
3.6.8.2.1 Recommendation.— Aeroplanes should be NCC.IDE.A.180. implemented when the individual CofA
Recommendation equipped with a forward or rearward facing seat (within 15 was issued after 31
degrees of the longitudinal axis of the aeroplane), fitted with December 1980.
a safety harness for the use of each cabin crew member
required to satisfy the intent of 3.12.1 in respect of
emergency evacuation.

Note.— Safety harness includes shoulder straps and a


seat belt which may be used independently.
Chapter 3
3.6.8.2.2 Cabin crew seats provided in accordance with R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 3.6.8.1 or 3.6.8.2.1 shall be located near floor level and other 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.180
3.6.8.2.2 emergency exits as required by the State of Registry for pt. (a)(5);AMC3
emergency evacuation. NCC.IDE.A.180.

Standard

14-December-2020 Page 169 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
3.6.9 Aeroplanes required to be equipped with R.(EU) More Exacting European Regulatory
Reference an airborne collision avoidance system (ACAS) 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.140; or Exceeds system requires ACAS II for
3.6.9.1 R.(EU) 1332/2011. turbine engine aeroplanes
3.6.9.1 Recommendation.— All turbine-engined with an MCTOM of more
aeroplanes of a maximum certificated take-off mass in excess than 5700 kg or MOPSC of
Recommendation of 15 000 kg, or authorized to carry more than 30 more than 19.
passengers, for which the individual airworthiness
certificate is first issued after 24 November 2005, should be
equipped with an airborne collision avoidance system
(ACAS II).
Chapter 3
3.6.9.2 All turbine-engined aeroplanes of a maximum R.(EU) No Difference
Reference certificated take-off mass in excess of 15 000 kg, or authorized 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.140
3.6.9.2 to carry more than 30 passengers, for which the individual
airworthiness certificate is first issued after 1 January 2007,
shall be equipped with an airborne collision avoidance system
Standard (ACAS II).

Chapter 3
3.6.9.3 Recommendation.— All turbine-engined R.(EU) No Difference
Reference aeroplanes of a maximum certificated take-off mass in excess 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.140
3.6.9.3 of 5 700 kg but not exceeding 15 000 kg, or authorized to
carry more than 19 passengers, for which the individual
airworthiness certificate is first issued after 1 January 2008,
Recommendation should be equipped with an airborne collision avoidance
system (ACAS II).

14-December-2020 Page 170 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
3.6.10 Aeroplanes required to be equipped with R.(EU) No Difference
Reference a pressure-altitude reporting transponder 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.255;
3.6.10 AMC1 NCC.IDE.A.255 (b)
Aeroplanes shall be equipped with a pressure-altitude
reporting transponder which operates in accordance with the
Standard relevant provisions of Annex 10, Volume IV.

Note.— This provision is intended to improve the


effectiveness of air traffic services as well as airborne
collision avoidance systems.

Chapter 3
3.6.11 Microphones R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.OP.160 pt.
3.6.11 All flight crew members required to be on flight deck duty (a);NCC.IDE.A.155
shall communicate through boom or throat microphones
below the transition level/altitude.
Standard

14-December-2020 Page 171 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
CHAPTER 3.7 AEROPLANE R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.245
3.7.1 COMMUNICATION, pt. (a)
NAVIGATION AND SURVEILLANCE
Standard EQUIPMENT

3.7.1 Communication equipment

In addition to the requirements of 2.5.1.1 to 2.5.1.5, an


aeroplane shall be provided with radio communication
equipment capable of:

a) conducting two-way communication for aerodrome


control purposes;

b) receiving meteorological information at any time


during flight; and

c) conducting two-way communication at any time


during flight with at least one aeronautical station
and with such other aeronautical stations and on
such frequencies as may be prescribed by the
appropriate authority.

Note.— The requirements of 3.7.1 are considered


fulfilled if the ability to conduct the communications
specified therein is established during radio propagation
conditions which are normal for the route.

14-December-2020 Page 172 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
3.7.2 Installation R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.100
3.7.2 The equipment installation shall be such that the failure of pt. (a), (c);GM1
any single unit required for communications, navigation or NCC.IDE.A.100(a);GM1
surveillance purposes or any combination thereof will not NCC.IDE.A.100(c)
Standard result in the failure of another unit required for
communications, navigation or surveillance purposes.

Chapter 3
3.7.3 Electronic navigation data management R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.260
3.7.3.1 3.7.3.1 The operator of an aeroplane shall not employ
electronic navigation data products that have been processed
for application in the air and on the ground unless the State of
Standard Registry has approved the operator’s procedures for ensuring
that the process applied and the products delivered have met
acceptable standards of integrity and that the products are
compatible with the intended function of the existing
equipment. The State of Registry shall ensure that the
operator continues to monitor both the process and products.

Note.— Guidance relating to the processes that data


suppliers may follow is contained in RTCA
DO-200A/EUROCAE ED-76 and RTCA DO-201A/EUROCAE
ED-77.
Chapter 3
3.7.3.2 The operator shall implement procedures that R.(EU) No Difference
Reference ensure the timely distribution and insertion of current and 965/2012:NCC.IDE.A.260
3.7.3.2 unaltered electronic navigation data to all necessary pt. (b)
aeroplanes.

Standard

14-December-2020 Page 173 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
CHAPTER 3.8 AEROPLANE R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 1321/2014:M.A.201(a) and
3.8.1.1 MAINTENANCE†† (h);M.A.704(a)
(7);M.A.704(b);M.A.712(
b)1;ML.A.201(a).CAMO.
Standard A.300(a)11;CAMO.A.300(
3.8.1 Operator’s maintenance responsibilities†† b);CAMO.A.200(a)6.CAO
.A.025(a)10; CAO.A.100(b
3.8.1.1 The operator shall comply with the requirements ).
of 2.6.1.

-------------------------------------------------------------
†† As of 5 November 2020, the following Chapter and
section will be titled:
Chapter 3.8 — Aeroplane Continuing Airworthiness
Paragraph 3.8.1 — Operator’s Continuing Airworthiness
Responsibilities
Chapter 3
3.8.1.2 Recommendation.— The operator should ensure R.(EU) Less protective Partially
Reference that all maintenance personnel receive initial and 1321/2014:M.A.201(g);145 or partially implemented.The
3.8.1.2 continuation training acceptable to the State of Registry .A.30(e);145.A.35(d) implemented or recommendation is not
and appropriate to their assigned tasks and responsibilities. AMC1 145.A.30(e); not implemented; initial and
This should include Human Factors and coordination with AMC2 implemented continuation training are
Recommendation other maintenance personnel and flight crew. 145.A.30(e);M.A.607;AM not specifically
C addressed in M.A.607 or
Note.— Guidance material on the application of Human M.A.607;CAO.A.035(e);A Human Factors.
Factors principles can be found in the Human Factors MC1 CAO.A.35(e)
Training Manual (Doc 9683).

14-December-2020 Page 174 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
3.8.2 Operator’s maintenance control manual R.(EU) Less protective Partially
Reference 1321/2014:M.A.604AMC or partially implemented.Part-M,
3.8.2.1 Recommendation.— The operator should provide a M.A.604CAO.A.025;AM implemented or Part-CAMO and
maintenance control manual, as specified in 3.11.1, for the C CAO.A.025 not Part-CAO do not observe
use and guidance of maintenance and operations personnel. implemented Human Factors principles
Recommendation The design of the manual should observe Human Factors in the design of the
principles. Maintenance Control
Manual
Note 1.— Guidance material on the application of
Human Factors principles can be found in the Human
Factors Training Manual (Doc 9683).

Note 2.— States may provide guidance material as


outlined in 3.11.2 or reference accepted industry codes of
practice.

Chapter 3
3.8.3 Maintenance programme R.(EU) Less protective Partially
Reference 1321/2014:M.A.301(3);M. or partially implemented.Part-M
3.8.3.1 3.8.3.1 The operator shall provide, for the use and A.302(b);M.A.708(b)1, 4, implemented or Subpart G, Part-CAMO and
guidance of maintenance and operational personnel 8;ML.A.301(c);ML.A.302( not Part-CAO do not observe
concerned, a maintenance programme, acceptable to the State b);CAMO.A.315(b);CAO. implemented Human Factors principles in
Standard of Registry, containing the information required by 3.11.2. The A.075. the design of the
design and application of the operator’s maintenance Maintenance Programme.
programme shall observe Human Factors principles.

Note.— Guidance material on the application of Human


Factors principles can be found in the Human Factors
Training Manual (Doc 9683).

14-December-2020 Page 175 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
3.8.3.2 Copies of all amendments to the maintenance Reg. (EU) Different in Partially implemented.EU
Reference programme shall be furnished promptly to all organizations or 1321/2014:M.A.302(g);ML character or requirements do not
3.8.3.2 persons to whom the maintenance programme has been .A.302(b) other means of explicitly describe that
issued. compliance ‘Copies of all amendments
shall be furnished promptly
Standard to all organizations or
persons to whom the
manual has been issued.
Chapter 3
3.8.4 Continuing airworthiness information R.(EU) More Exacting For the transmission of the
Reference 1321/2014:M.A.301(4);M. or Exceeds information as per Annex 8
3.8.4 The operator of an aeroplane of a maximum certificated A.202(a);AMC M.A.301 there is no alleviation
take-off mass in excess of 5 700 kg shall, as prescribed by the 2;R.(EU) related to MTOW –
State of Registry, ensure that the information resulting from 965/2012:ORO.GEN.160. required from all
Standard maintenance and operational experience with respect to aeroplanes’ owners.
continuing airworthiness, is transmitted as required by Annex
8, Part II, 4.2.3 f) and 4.2.4.

Chapter 3
3.8.5 Maintenance release R.(EU) Less protective
Reference 1321/2014:145.A.50(a) and or partially
3.8.5.1 3.8.5.1 Until 4 November 2020, a maintenance release (b);145.A.50(d);M.A.612; implemented or
shall be completed and signed, as prescribed by the State of M.A.613(a);M.A.801;AM not
Registry, to certify that the maintenance work has been C M.A.801(f)AMC implemented
Standard performed in accordance with the maintenance programme or M.A.801(b)ML.A.801(a);
other data and procedures acceptable to the State of Registry. AMC
ML.A.801(e);ML.A.402(a)
;CAO.A.055;CAO.A.065;
CAO.A.070.
Chapter 3
3.8.5.1 As of 5 November 2020, when maintenance is R.(EU) No Difference Maintenance and release
Reference carried out by an approved maintenance organization, the 1321/2014:145.A.50(a) and to service can be
3.8.5.1 maintenance release shall be issued by the approved (b);145.A.50(d);M.A.612; performed by Part-MF,
maintenance organization in accordance with the provisions M.A.613(a);M.A.801;M.A Part-145 or
of Annex 8, Part II, 6.8. .402(a);ML.A.801(a);ML. Part-CAO.Part-M subpart
Standard A.402(a);CAO.A.065;CA F can be applied until
O.A.070. 8-7-2021.

14-December-2020 Page 176 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
3.8.5.2 Until 4 November 2020, a maintenance release R.(EU) 1321/2014:145.A.50 Less protective Partially implemented.Point Maintenance and release
Reference shall contain a certification including: (a);M.A.801(f);Appendix or partially d) identity of the person to service by a person
3.8.5.2 II to Part-M;AMC implemented or has not been explicitly can be performed by
a) basic details of the maintenance performed; 145.A.50(b);AMC not specified in the Part-145 Part-MF or
M.A.801(f) implemented requirements for the aircraft Part-CAO.Part-M subpart
Standard b) the date such maintenance was completed; (2);ML.A.801(e);AMC Certificate of Release to F can be applied until
M.A.801(e) Service, in addition to the 8-7-2021.
c) when applicable, the identity of the approved requirement for the identity
maintenance organization; and of the organisation.For
components, the name of
d) the identity of the person or persons signing the the Certifying Staff is
release. foreseen in Form 1 block 14.
Chapter 3
3.8.5.2 As of 5 November 2020, when a maintenance is R.(EU) Less protective Partially Maintenance and release
Reference not carried out by an approved maintenance organization, the 1321/2014:M.A.801(b)2, or partially implemented.Pilot-owner to service by a person
3.8.5.2 maintenance release shall be completed and signed by a 3;M.A.803ML.A.801(b)2, implemented or authorisation does not can be performed by
person appropriately licensed in accordance with Annex 1 to 3. not comply with the Part-MF, or
certify that the maintenance work has been performed in implemented requirement that a person Part-CAO.Part-M subpart
Standard accordance with the maintenance programme or other data shall be appropriately F can be applied until
and procedures acceptable to the State of Registry. licenced in accordance with 8-7-2021.
Annex 1.
Chapter 3
3.8.5.3 As of 5 November 2020, when maintenance is not R. (EU) No Difference Maintenance and release
Reference carried out by an approved maintenance organization, the 1321/2014:M.A.801(f);ML. to service by a person
3.8.5.3 maintenance release shall include the following: A.801(e) can be performed by
Part-MF or
a) basic details of the maintenance performed; Part-CAO.Part-M subpart
Standard F can be applied until
b) the date such maintenance was completed; and 8-7-2021.

c) the identity of the person or persons signing the


release.

14-December-2020 Page 177 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
CHAPTER 3.9 AEROPLANE R.(EU) 2018/1139:Annex No Difference
Reference V: pt. 8.6.R.(EU)
3.9.1.1 FLIGHT CREW 965/2012:ORO.FC.105 pt.
(a)

Standard
3.9.1 Composition of the flight crew

3.9.1.1 Designation of pilot-in-command

For each flight the operator shall designate a pilot to act as


pilot-in-command.

Chapter 3
3.9.1.2 Flight engineer R.(EU) No Difference Licensing of flight
Reference 965/2012:ORO.FC.110 engineers remains within
3.9.1.2 When a separate flight engineer’s station is incorporated in Member States'
the design of an aeroplane, the flight crew shall include at responsibility.
least one flight engineer especially assigned to that station,
Standard unless the duties associated with that station can be
satisfactorily performed by another flight crew member,
holding a flight engineer licence, without interference with
regular duties.

14-December-2020 Page 178 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
3.9.2 Flight crew member emergency duties R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:ORO.FC.130;OR
3.9.2 The operator shall, for each type of aeroplane, assign to all O.GEN.110 pt. (e), (f)
flight crew members the necessary functions they are to
perform in an emergency or in a situation requiring emergency
Standard evacuation. Recurrent training in accomplishing these
functions shall be contained in the operator’s training
programme and shall include instruction in the use of all
emergency and life-saving equipment required to be carried,
and drills in the emergency evacuation of the aeroplane.

Chapter 3
3.9.3 Flight crew member training programmes R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:ORO.FC.115 pt.
3.9.3.1 3.9.3.1 The operator shall establish and maintain a (a);ORO.FC.130 pt. (a).R.
training programme that is designed to ensure that a person (EU) 2018/1139:Annex V:
who receives training acquires and maintains the competency pt. 8.1.(b)
Standard to perform assigned duties, including skills related to human
performance.
Chapter 3
3.9.3.2 Ground and flight training programmes shall be R.(EU) No Difference
Reference established, either through internal programmes or through a 965/2012:ORO.FC.145 pt.
3.9.3.2 training services provider, and shall include or make reference (a);ORO.GEN.205 pt. (a).
to a syllabus for those training programmes in the company
operations manual.
Standard

Chapter 3
3.9.3.3 The training programme shall include training to R.(EU) No Difference
Reference competency for all equipment installed. 965/2012:ORO.FC.120 pt.
3.9.3.3 (b);ORO.FC.130

Standard

14-December-2020 Page 179 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
3.9.3.4 Recommendation.— Flight simulators should be R.(EU) 965/2012:ORO.FC No Difference The sentence is not
Reference used to the maximum extent practicable for initial and and ORO.CC transposed as such,
3.9.3.4 annual recurrent training. however, there are
abundant references
addressing the use of
Recommendation simulation devices
during pilot and cabin
crew training.To be
implemented with
RMT.0599. Amending
regulation expected to be
published in 2020.
Chapter 3
3.9.4 Qualifications R.(EU) 2018/1139:Annex No Difference
Reference V: pt. 7.1.R.(EU)
3.9.4.1.1 965/2012:ORO.FC.100 pt.
3.9.4.1 Flight crew member licensing (c)

Standard 3.9.4.1.1 The operator shall:

a) ensure that each flight crew member assigned to


duty holds a valid licence issued by the State of
Registry, or if issued by another Contracting State,
rendered valid by the State of Registry;

b) ensure that flight crew members are properly rated;


and

c) be satisfied that flight crew members are competent


to carry out assigned duties.

14-December-2020 Page 180 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
3.9.4.1.2 The operator of an aeroplane equipped with an R.(EU) No Difference
Reference airborne collision avoidance system (ACAS II) shall ensure 965/2012:NCC.OP.220;R.
3.9.4.1.2 that each flight crew member has been appropriately trained to (EU)
competency in the use of ACAS II equipment and the 1332/2011:ACAS.AUR.10
avoidance of collisions. 10
Standard
Note 1.— Procedures for the use of ACAS II equipment
are specified in the Procedures for Air Navigation Services —
Aircraft Operations (PANS-OPS, Doc 8168), Volume I —
Flight Procedures. ACAS II Training Guidelines for Pilots are
provided in PANS-OPS, Volume I, Attachment A to Part III,
Section 3, Chapter 3.

Note 2.— Appropriate training, to the satisfaction of the


State, to competency in the use of ACAS II equipment and the
avoidance of collisions may be evidenced, for example, by:

a) possession of a type rating for an aeroplane


equipped with ACAS II, where the operation and
use of ACAS II are included in the training syllabus
for the type rating; or

b) possession of a document issued by a training


organization or person approved by the State to
conduct training for pilots in the use of ACAS II,
indicating that the holder has been trained in
accordance with the guidelines referred to in Note
1; or

c) a comprehensive pre-flight briefing by a pilot who


has been trained in the use of ACAS II in
accordance with the guidelines referred to in Note
1.

14-December-2020 Page 181 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
3.9.4.2 Recent experience — pilot-in-command R.(EU) 1178/2011:FCL.060 Different in Other means of
Reference pt. (b) character or compliance.R.(EU) 965/2012
3.9.4.2 The operator shall not assign a pilot to act as other means of does not include this
pilot-in-command of an aeroplane unless that pilot has made compliance requirement for pilots flying
at least three take-offs and landings within the preceding 90 on non-commercial flights
Standard days on the same type of aeroplane or in a flight simulator (NCC, NCO).
approved for the purpose.

Chapter 3
3.9.4.3 Recent experience — co-pilot R.(EU) 1178/2011:FCL.060 Different in Other means of compliance.
Reference pt. (b) character or R.(EU) 965/2012 does not
3.9.4.3 The operator shall not assign a co-pilot to operate at the flight other means of include this requirement for
controls of an aeroplane during take-off and landing unless compliance pilots flying on
that pilot has made at least three take-offs and landings within non-commercial flights
Standard the preceding 90 days on the same type of aeroplane or in a (NCC, NCO).
flight simulator approved for the purpose.

Chapter 3
3.9.4.4 Pilot proficiency checks R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:ORO.FC.130 pt.
3.9.4.4 The operator shall ensure that piloting technique and the (b);ORO.FC.145 pt. (a)
ability to execute emergency procedures is checked
periodically in such a way as to demonstrate the pilot’s
Standard competence. Where the operation may be conducted under
the instrument flight rules, the operator shall ensure that the
pilot’s competence to comply with such rules is demonstrated
to either a check pilot of the operator or a representative of
the State issuing the pilot licence.

Note.— The periodicity of the checks referred to in


3.9.4.4 is dependent upon the complexity of both the
aeroplane and the operation.

14-December-2020 Page 182 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
R. (EU) Less protective Not implemented.The
CHAPTER 3.10 FLIGHT
Reference 965/2012:ORO.GEN.110 or partially human factor element of
3.10.0.1 OPERATIONS pt. (e) implemented or training is not
not specifically mentioned in
OFFICER/FLIGHT DISPATCHER
implemented ORO.GEN.110.Minimum
Recommendation training requirements for
OCC personnel will be
addressed in RMT.0392
Recommendation.— The operator should ensure that
any person assigned as a flight operations officer/flight
dispatcher is trained and maintains familiarization with all
features of the operation which are pertinent to their duties,
including knowledge and skills related to Human Factors.

14-December-2020 Page 183 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
CHAPTER 3.11 MANUALS, LOGS R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 1321/2014:M.A.202;M.A.7
3.11.1.0.1 AND RECORDS 06(j);M.A.704(a)
(2);M.A.704(a)(3), (7),
(9);Appendix V to AMC
Recommendation M.A.704;M.A.708(b)(1),
Note.— The following document is associated with this (5), (8), (9);M.A.712(a)
Annex but is not included in this chapter: (b).ML.A.202;ML.A.301(b
)(d);CAO.A.025(a)(2),
Operational flight plan — see 3.4.3.3. (10);CAO.A.075(b)(1), (5),
(6),
(9);CAO.A.090;CAO.A.10
0(b);CAMO.A.155;CAM
3.11.1 Operator’s maintenance control manual O.A.160;CAMO.A.202;C
AMO.A.220;CAMO.A.30
Recommendation.— The operator’s maintenance control 0(a)3,5,6,10,11,12;CAMO.
manual provided in accordance with 3.8.2, which may be A.300(b);CAMO.A.315((b
issued in separate parts, should be developed according to )(1)
industry codes of practice or to the State of Registry’s
guidance material, and should at a minimum contain
information about:

a) the means for complying with the procedures


required by 3.8.1.1;

b) the means of recording the names and duties of the


person or persons required by 3.8.1.1;

c) the maintenance programme required by 3.8.3.1;

d) until 4 November 2020, the methods used for the


completion and retention of the operator’s
maintenance records required by 3.8.5;

e) the procedures for complying with the service


information reporting requirements of Annex 8, Part
II, 4.2.3 f) and 4.2.4;

14-December-2020 Page 184 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

f) the procedures for implementing action resulting


from mandatory continuing airworthiness
information;

g) a system of analysis and continued monitoring of


the performance and efficiency of the maintenance
programme, in order to correct any deficiency in
that programme;

h) the aircraft types and models to which the manual


applies;

i) the procedures for ensuring that unserviceabilities


affecting airworthiness are recorded and rectified;
and

j) procedures for advising the State of Registry of


significant in-service occurrences.

14-December-2020 Page 185 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
Recommendation.— The operator’s maintenance control
Reference manual provided in accordance with 3.8.2, which may be
3.11.1.0.2 issued in separate parts, should be developed according to
industry codes of practice or to the State of Registry’s
guidance material, and should at a minimum contain
Recommendation information about:

a) the means for complying with the procedures


required by 3.8.1.1;

b) the means of recording the names and duties of the


person or persons required by 3.8.1.1;

c) the maintenance programme required by 3.8.3.1;

d) as of 5 November 2020, the methods used for the


completion and retention of the operator’s
continuing airworthiness records required by 3.8.5;

e) the procedures for complying with the service


information reporting requirements of Annex 8, Part
II, 4.2.3 f) and 4.2.4;

f) the procedures for implementing action resulting


from mandatory continuing airworthiness
information;

g) a system of analysis and continued monitoring of


the performance and efficiency of the maintenance
programme, in order to correct any deficiency in
that programme;

h) the aircraft types and models to which the manual


applies;

i) the procedures for ensuring that unserviceabilities


affecting airworthiness are recorded and rectified;

14-December-2020 Page 186 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

and

j) procedures for advising the State of Registry of


significant in-service occurrences.

Chapter 3
3.11.2 Maintenance programme R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 1321/2014:M.A.302(f);1.1.
3.11.2.1 3.11.2.1 A maintenance programme for each aeroplane as 10 and 1.1.6 of Appendix I
required by 3.8.3 shall contain the following information: to AMC M.A.302 and
M.B.301(b); 1.1.13 of
Standard a) maintenance tasks and the intervals at which these Appendix I to AMC
are to be performed, taking into account the M.A.302 and M.B.301(b);
anticipated utilization of the aeroplane; 1.1.7 and 4 of Appendix I
b) when applicable, a continuing structural integrity to AMC M.A.302 and
programme; M.B.301(b); AMC
M.A.302(d)(4), 6 of
c) procedures for changing or deviating from a) and b) Appendix I to AMC
above as approved by the State of Registry; and M.A.302 and
M.B.301(b);ML.A.302.
d) when applicable and approved by the State of
Registry, condition monitoring and reliability
programme descriptions for aircraft systems,
components and engines.
Chapter 3
3.11.2.2 Maintenance tasks and intervals that have been R.(EU) No Difference
Reference specified as mandatory in approval of the type design, or 1321/2014:M.A.302;1.1.17,
3.11.2.2 approved changes to the maintenance programme, shall be 1.1.5 of Appendix I to
identified as such. AMC M.A.302 and
M.B.301(b).ML.A.302;Ap
Standard pendix I to AMC
ML.A.302 and
ML.B.301(b)

14-December-2020 Page 187 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
3.11.2.3 Recommendation.— The maintenance R.(EU) No Difference
Reference programme should be based on maintenance programme 1321/2014:M.A.302(d);ML
3.11.2.3 information made available by the State of Design or by the -A.302.
organization responsible for the type design, and any
additional applicable experience.
Recommendation

Chapter 3
3.11.3 Flight recorder records R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.GEN.145 pt.
3.11.3 The owner of the aeroplane, or in the case where it is leased, (a)
the lessee, shall ensure, to the extent possible, in the event
the aeroplane becomes involved in an accident or incident,
Standard the preservation of all related flight recorder records and, if
necessary, the associated flight recorders, and their retention
in safe custody pending their disposition as determined in
accordance with Annex 13.

Chapter 3
CHAPTER 3.12 CABIN CREW R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:ORO.CC.100;A
3.12.1 MC1 ORO.CC.100;GM1
ORO.CC.100
3.12.1 Assignment of emergency duties
Standard

The requirement for cabin crew for each type of aeroplane


shall be determined by the operator, based on seating
capacity or the number of passengers carried, in order to
effect a safe and expeditious evacuation of the aeroplane, and
the necessary functions to be performed in an emergency or a
situation requiring emergency evacuation. The operator shall
assign these functions for each type of aeroplane.

14-December-2020 Page 188 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
3.12.2 Cabin crew at emergency evacuation stations R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.GEN.105 pt.
3.12.2 When cabin crew are required by a State authority, each cabin (b);NCC.IDE.A.180 pt. (a)
crew member assigned to emergency evacuation duties shall (5);
occupy a seat provided in accordance with 3.6.8 during
Standard take-off and landing and whenever the pilot-in-command so
directs.

Chapter 3
3.12.3 Protection of cabin crew during flight R.(EU) No Difference
Reference 965/2012:NCC.GEN.105 pt.
3.12.3 Each cabin crew member shall be seated with seat belt or, (b);NCC.IDE.A.180 pt. (a)
when provided, safety harness fastened during take-off and (5);
landing and whenever the pilot-in-command so directs.
Standard

Chapter 3
3.12.4 Training R.(EU) 1178/2011:Annex V No Difference If the NCC operator
Reference PartCC. R.(EU) decides to carry a cabin
3.12.4.1 3.12.4.1 The operator shall ensure that a training 965/2012:Subpart CC, crew member, the cabin
programme is completed by all persons before being assigned Section 1For crew member has to
as a cabin crew member. DG:ORO.GEN.110 pt. comply with the rules
Standard (j);SPA.DG.105; indicated here.

14-December-2020 Page 189 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
3.12.4.2 Recommendation.— The operator should R.(EU) 965/2012: Subpart No Difference
Reference establish and maintain a cabin crew training programme CC, Section
3.12.4.2 that is designed to ensure that persons who receive training 1:ORO.CC.115ORO.CC.12
acquire the competency to perform their assigned duties and 0;ORO.CC.125;ORO.CC.1
includes or makes reference to a syllabus for the training 30;ORO.CC.135;ORO.CC.
Recommendation programme in the company operations manual. The training 140;ORO.CC.145And the
programme should include Human Factors training. complementing
AMCs/GMs. For Human
Note.— Guidance material on the application of Human Factors/CRM: AMC and
Factors principles can be found in the Cabin Crew Safety GM to ORO.CC.115(e)
Training Manual (Doc 10002).

14-December-2020 Page 190 of 191


Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) TENTH EDITION OF PART II - JULY 2018
European Union Aviation Safety Agency Annex 6, Part 2, Amendment 37
Report on entire Annex
Annex Reference OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT State Legislation, Level of Text of the difference to be Comments including the
Standard or Recommended Practice Regulation or Document implementation notified to ICAO reason for the difference
Reference of SARP's

Chapter 3
R.(EU) 2018/1139:Annex No Difference Article 10 of Reg.
CHAPTER 3.13 SECURITY
Reference V: pt. 8.4.Reg.(EC) No 300/2008 is directed
3.13.1.0.1 300/2008 towards the Member
State. Art. 13 is directed
to the aircraft operator.
3.13.1 Security programme
Recommendation Art. 14 requires the entity
to establish a security
Recommendation.— Each Contracting State should
programme.The EU
ensure that each entity conducting general aviation
operator is bound by the
operations, including corporate operator aviation
national security
operations, using aircraft with a maximum take-off mass
programme as mandated
greater than 5 700 kg, establishes, implements and
by Reg. 300/2008. EU
maintains a written operator security programme that meets
operators complying with
the requirements of the national civil aviation security
an industry standard can
programme of that State.
find additional guidance
in those standards.
Note.— Accepted industry codes of practice may be used
as the basis for the development of a written operator
security programme.

- END -

14-December-2020 Page 191 of 191

You might also like