Module 2 Decision Making
Module 2 Decision Making
DECISION MAKING
ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT
Module Description
This module deals with the intricacies of decision-making. It deals with the engineer manager’s
decision-making skills, as he is primarily tasked to provide leadership in the quest for the
attainment of the organization’s objectives.
Introduction
Managers of all kinds and types, including the engineer manager, are primarily tasked to
provide leadership in the quest for attainment of the organization’s objectives. If he is to become
effective, he must learn the intricacies of decision making. Many times, he will be confronted by
situations where he will have to choose from among various options. Whatever his choice, it will
have effects, immediate or otherwise, in the operations of this organization.
The engineer manager’s decision-making skills will be very crucial to his success as a
professional. A major blunder in decision-making may be sufficient to cause the destruction of
any organization. Good decisions, on the other hand, will provide the right environment for
continuous growth and success of any organized effort.
1. Diagnose problem
2. Analyze environment
3. Articulate problems or opportunity
4. Develop Viable alternatives
5. Evaluate the alternatives
6. Make a choice
7. Implement decision
The internal environment refers to organizational activities within a firm that surrounds
decision-making. Shown in figure 2.1 are the important aspects of the internal environment.
The external environment refers to variables that are outside the organization and not
typically within the short-run control of top management. Figure 2.2 shows the forces
comprising the external environment of the firm.
Figure 2.1 the Engineering Firm and the Internal Environment in Decision Making
The Engineering Firm
To illustrate:
An engineering firm has a problem of increasing its output by 30%. This is the result of a
new agreement between firm and one of its clients.
The list of solutions prepared by the engineering manager shown the following
alternatives courses of action:
1. Improve the capacity of the firm by
2. hiring more workers and building additional facilities;
3. Secure the services of subcontractors;
4. Buy the needed additional output from another firm;
5. Stop serving some of the company’s customers; and
6. Delay servicing clients.
The list was revised and only the first three were deemed to be viable. Last two were
deleted because of adverse effects in the long-run profitability of the firm.
After determining the viability of the alternatives and a revised list has been made, an
evaluation of the remaining alternatives is necessary. This is important because the next step
involves making a choice. Proper evaluation making choosing the right solution less difficult.
Hoe the alternatives bill be evaluated will depend on the nature of the problem. The
objectives of the firm, and the nature of alternatives presented. Souder suggest that “each
alternative must analyze and evaluated in terms of its value, cost, and risk characteristics”.
The value of the alternativesrefers to benefits that can be expected. An example may be
describes as follows: a net portion of Php 10 million per year if the alternative is chosen.
The cost of the alternative refers to out-of-pocket costs (like Php 10 million for
construction of facilities), opportunity costs (like the opportunity to earn interest of Php 2 million
per year if money is invested elsewhere), and follow on costs (like Php 3 million per year for
maintenance of facilities constructed).
The risk characteristics refer to the likelihood of achieving the goals of the alternatives. If
profitability of a net profit of Php 10 million is only 10%, then the decision-maker may opt to
consider an alternative with a Php 5 million profit but with an 80% profitability of access.
Another example of an evaluation of alternatives is shown below:
An engineer manager is faced with a problem of choosing between three applicants to fill
up a lone vacancy for a junior engineer. He will have to set up certain criteria for evaluating the
applicants. If the evaluation is not done by a professional human resources officer, then the
engineer manager will be forced to use a predetermined criteria.
Menandro Rillo 40 36 5 9 90
In this last stage of the decision-making process, the engineering manager will find out
whether or not the desired result is achieve. If the desired result is achieved, one may assume that
the decision made was good. If it was not achieve, Ferrell and Hirt suggest that further analysis is
necessary. Figure2.3 presents an elaboration of this last step.
Each shift consists of 200 workers manning 200 machines. On September 16,
1996, the operations went smoothly until the factory manage, an industrial engineer, was
notified at 1:00 P.M. that five of the workers assigned to the second shift could not report
for work because of injuries sustained in a traffic accident while they were on their way
to the factory.
Because of time constraints, the manager made an instant decision on who among
the first shift worker would work overtime to man the five machines.
produce the demand requirements of customers within the next 12 months. As such, manpower
and facilities must be procured before the star of operations. To make decision on capacity more
effective, the engineer manager must be provided with data on demand requirements for that
next 12 months. This type of information may be derived through forecasting.
Forecasting may be defined as “the collection of past and current information to make
predictions about the future.”
5.6 Simulation
Simulation is model constructed to represent reality, on which conclusions about real-life
problems can be used. It is a highly sophisticated tool by means of which the decision maker
develops a mathematical model of the system under consideration.
Simulation does not guarantee an optimum solution, but it can evaluate the alternatives
fed into process by the decision-maker.
Review Questions
1. How may one define decision-making?
2. What are the steps in the decision-making process ?
3. What are the approaches in solving problems?
Assessment
1. Can the engineer manager avoid making decision ? Why or why not ?
2. How may one develop viable alternatives in problem solving ?
3. What are the components of the environment from the point of view of the decision
maker ?
Assessment Tool
This will help your instructor to check your output. In this module , an analytical rubric is used
to determine and measure your learning through the activities set by your instructor. An analytic
rubric breaks down the characteristics of an assignment into parts, allowing the scorer to
itemize and define what aspects are strong, and which ones need improvement. (Gonzales,
2014)
fluency complete and related complete and are complete and incomplete or
to one another. understandable. understandable. too long that
makes it
difficult to read.
The answer
Few errors found in makes hard to Answer
No punctuation or terms of read due to contains
Structure structural mistakes. punctuation marks, several mistakes numerous
No spelling errors. capita letter case , using end marks spelling or
and spelling or capitals as structural errors.
well as spelling
mistakes.
Reference :