Unit 12 Group Formation and Structure
Unit 12 Group Formation and Structure
Unit 12 Group Formation and Structure
Structure
12.0 Objectives
12.1 Introduction
12.2 Concept of Group
12.3 Significance of Group Behaviour
12.4 Factors of Group Formation
12.5 Types of Work Groups
12.5.1 Formal Work Groups
12.5.2 Informal Work Groups
12.5.3 Small Groups vs Large Groups
12.6 Development of Group
12.7 Group Cohesiveness
12.8 Group Structure
12.9 Group Norms
12.10 Group Dynamics
12.11 Group Decision Making
12.12 Let Us Sum Up
12.13 Key Words
12.14 Terminal Questions
12.0 OBJECTIVES
After going through this unit, you should be able to:
• describe the concept of the group;
• discuss the significance of group behaviour;
• classify different types of groups;
• explain different stages of group development;
• describe the concept of group cohesiveness;
• explain the concept of group norms;
• discuss group dynamics; and
• explain the merits and limitations of group decision-making.
12.1 INTRODUCTION
We are all social beings. We are born and brought up in the society. When we join an organisation, we have
to join as individual employee. After joining the organisation, as social beings we cannot remain alone and
aloof from others. Therefore, an individual forms or joins a group. It is because, an organisation is a society
in miniature. It is collection of individuals, who are usually assembled or clustered into groups or team to
perform different activities of the organisation. Organisations use groups or teams because certain tasks are
difficult to be performed alone by the individuals. A group is more than the sum of its parts. In fact, groups
are the basic building blocks of an organisation. No doubt, individuals are clustered into groups to fulfill
several needs but it also helps organisations to achieve organisational goals and gain competitive advantage.
The effective functioning of any organisation depends on the performance of the various groups in the
organisation. In this Unit, you will learn the concept of group, significance of group behaviour, factors of
group formation and various types of groups. You will be further exposed to the process of development of
group, group cohesiveness and group structure. You will be familiarised with the concept of group norms
and group dynamics and the process of group decision making.
Given the important role that groups play in organisations, let us concentrate our focus upon the meaning of
a work group. In true sense and for our purpose of studying group behaviour, the collection of individuals is
called a group, when:
• They have a common goal;
• The members of the group constantly interact with each other, so that one person’s actions affect and
are being affected by the action of another person;
• Each member of group identifies with other member of the group;
• The member of the group is psychologically aware of each other;
• The behaviour of each member is interdependent on others.
Thus, a group is a set of two or more people who continuously interact with each other to achieve certain
goals or meet certain needs. Accordingly, only gathering of individuals cannot be called a group.
Sometime we are confused that a group is also a team. A group can be called a team when it is formally
formed by the organisation. Katzenbach & Smith have defined a team as a small number of people with
complementary skills who are committed to a common purpose, set of performance goals, and approach for
which they hold themselves mutually accountable. Thus, major difference between the team and group is
that the group can also be informally formed without any complementary skills and formal efforts of the
organisation ; team is always constituted by the organisation. It so happens because it is practically
impossible for a formal organisation to meet the informal needs of its employees.
Group Function : The work that a group performs for the accomplishment of organisational goals is called
group function. The functions of a formal group is different from the functions of an informal group. A
formal group has to perform the assigned tasks of the organisation. For example, in a car manufacturing
plant, one group’s function may be to make the automobile bodies, another’s function is to fit engine in the
body, and another’s could be to fit the accessories in the body. In fact, we can say that the entire organisation
consists of a series of groups linked with each other depending upon their functions they perform in order to
help the organisation to achieve its goals. Thus, group function is important both for the group as well as for
the organisation. The function of a group influences the behaviour of its group members. The group provides
them a sense of purpose of their work and motivates them to achieve the target.
Social Facilitation : The presence of group members may either facilitate the performance or create obstacle
in performing the task. The presence of other members may stimulate the effort of the individual because he/
she may think that others are evaluating his/her performance. This feeling induces the desire of the
individual to perform better in the group. In the same way, if the task is not liked by group members, the
individual may show little interest in performing such task. Therefore, the leader must create such
environment at the work place, where the group influences the better performance of the individuals.
Psychological Factors : After joining the organisation, individual joins a particular group in which he/she
finds him/her interest, attitude, personality, perception etc. matching with other individuals within the
department or the organisation. As a result, group is formed.
Social Factors : Individuals also form or join the group based upon their social class, caste, and religion to
satisfy their social needs. They do it primarily for satisfying their love, affection and care needs, which
initially they feel deprived after leaving their families.
Security Factors : As an individual, sometimes one can feel insecure over unexpected developments such as
sudden health problem, termination, suspension, local problems etc., therefore, everyone likes to be in a
group to feel secured to work. Especially in a new place, for a new employee, the security need could be one
of the major factors for joining a group.
Economic Factors : When an individual works in an organisation, he/she gets all types of economic
incentives and benefits available within the rules and regulations. Sometimes organisations cannot meet an
individual’s accidental or obligatory needs like money for marriage, house construction, medical care and
other proposes. So he/she gets associated with those people who help him/her at the time of need.
Cultural Factors : Individuals come to work from different society and culture. In case the place at which
they work are far away from their place of origin , region and culture; they feel like a fish out of water. It
may be due to the absence of cultural celebrations. This is one of the reasons for which people coming from
same culture, tradition and speaking similar language usually form the group.
Proximity, Interaction, Interest and Influence : This is one of the common and logical reason for which
people form the group in the organisation. Some people have to work together. Due to the similarity of
nature of job, they have to interact with each other for this purpose. In course of interaction, interest
develops which ultimately influences each other to sit, eat, discuss and share besides working together.
1) What is Group ?
……………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………
Formal work groups are formed by the organisations. These groups are formed in order to help the
organisation to achieve its specific goals. The goals of formal work group are determined according to the
needs of the organisation. For example, purchase committee, quality control group, disciplinary action
committee are the formal groups constituted by an organisation. These groups are established to accomplish
certain organisational goals such as increasing product quality, safety, discipline, etc. in an organisation.
There are different types of formal groups in an organisation. Four important kinds of formal groups are
command groups, the committees, teams, and self-managed work teams. Let us learn them in detail.
Command Group : It is the collection of employees who report to the same supervisor. Command
groups are based on the basic reporting relationship in organisations. The existence of formal groups is
represented on organisational charts as departments (such as finance, personnel, marketing, sales, or
accounting). Command groups help an organisation to accomplish variety of tasks. They have tremendous
impact upon the extent to which an organisation is able to achieve its goals. The leaders of the command
group play an important role in determining the effectiveness of these groups.
The Committees : It is the collection of people who are brought together by the organisation to accomplish
a specific goal. Once the goal is achieved, the organisation disbands the committees. In case such committees
are dealing with long term problems, in that case they may not be disbanded but the members in the
committees can be changed or rotated on the basis of seniority and other criteria. These kinds of committees
are known as standing committees.
The Team : It is a formal work group. People work in a group does not mean that they work in a team. A
team is formed by the organisation for some specific purpose. In a team, there is a high level of interaction
among its members. The members of the team work together very intensely to achieve a common goal. In
course of working together, the member of the team learn the abilities and experiences of their members to
accomplish things that could not be achieved by individuals working separately or by any other kinds of
work groups.
Self-Managed Work Teams : Self-managed work teams are little different from normal teams . The
members of self-managed work team are responsible for ensuring that the team accomplishes its goals.
Leader of this team is identified by its members. The performance of leadership tasks is assigned to
individual group members. The team is empowered to discipline its members who are not performing at an
adequate level. There is coordinating efforts across group members, and even hiring and firing for and
within the team is done by the team itself. In the recent years self-managed teams are gaining popularity and
they have created a dramatic impact on organisations as well as on their members.
Informal work groups emerge naturally in organisations. It is just like the shadow of the formal organisation.
It is because organisational members perceive that it is difficult for their organisations to formally fulfill
some of the bare needs and feel that membership in a group can help them to achieve their goals and meet
their needs. For example, when a group of five factory workers who go for a picnic, movie, or booz together
to satisfy their common need for affiliation and friendship this is the case of an informal group. Even
sometimes, some employees form informal group.due to their ideological similarity.
Informal groups can be broadly divided into two types They are : (i) friendship groups; and (ii) interest
groups.
Group size is an important determinant of the way group members behave. The size of a group is normally
measured by the number of full-time members who are involved in achieving the group’s goals. However, a
group can be composed of just two or more people. On the basis of number of members, a group can be a
small or large group. Let us learn them.
Small Groups : In a small group, members are likely to know everybody and interact regularly. In a small
group, it is relatively easier for members to share information and recognize individual’s contribution to the
group. The members of a small group identify themselves easily and quickly with group’s goals. The
motivation and commitment of its members to group goals is very high hence, the member of this group
derive higher levels of satisfaction.
Large Groups : In a large group, there are so many members. Because of many members, they are less
likely to know one another and may have little personal contact with each other on a day-to-day basis. As a
result, there exists lower level of interaction among members of this group and it makes information sharing
difficult among them. Some times, the factors which individuals consider lead to their own contributions to
the group, may become unimportant to the group, which ultimately reduces their motivation and commitment
towards group. Therefore, people normally tend to be less satisfied in larger groups.
Storming : As its name implies, this stage is characterised by considerable amount of conflict. At this stage,
group members try to resist for being controlled by the group very often, the members disagree about who
should lead the group. They also have difference of opinion over how much power should the leader of their
group have, etc. This stage is completed when group members no longer resist the group’s control and there
is mutual understanding and agreement about who will lead the group. Normally this stage is completed
when group members consider that is it is better to work together for the achievement of the group goals.
Norming : This is the third stage in the group development. At this stage, group members really start feeling
that they belong to the group. They develop a very close intimacy and relationship with one another. A
feeling of friendship develops among them. A well-developed sense of common purpose of the group
emerges among the members. In this stage, group members agree on standards to guide the behaviour in the
group.
Performing : When this stage reaches, the group is ready to tackle all types of group tasks. The members of
the group work toward achievement of the group goals. The real work of the group gets accomplished at this
stage. To arrive at this stage, groups should not take very long time.
Adjourning : This is the last stage of the group development. At this stage, a group disbands after having
accomplished its goals. However, ongoing work groups in organisations do not go through this stage rather
they remain at the performing stage.
…
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
……
……………………………………………………………………………………
…
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
……
……………………………………………………………………………………
…
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
……
…
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
……
With the passage of time, a group develops maturity and becomes cohesive. Cohesiveness is achieved in a
group when the group appears to be very attractive to its members, individuals value their group
membership and have a very strong willingness to remain members of the group. Thus, group cohesiveness is
nothing but it is the attractiveness of a group to its members. A highly cohesive group very much appeals to
their members. The cohesiveness of a group affects its performance and effectiveness. There are a large
number of factors, which influence the level of cohesiveness of a group. Those factors can be broadly
categorised into five types. They are : size of the group, homogeneous character of group members, success
of the group, competition with other groups, and the exclusiveness of the group. Let us learn them in detail.
Size of the Group : Just like small family is more cohesive, similar is the case with a group. In case the size
of the group is large, their members tend to be less satisfied and do not tend to be cohesive. Normally in a
large group, only a few members of the group try to dominate every thing such as suggestion, opinion, its day
to day functioning without giving opportunities for participation to the other members in the group.
Therefore, the large groups are more prone to conflict, and members find it difficult to form close ties with
each other, than a small or medium size group in which there exists cohesiveness.
Homogeneous Character of Group Members : More similarity the member feel with each other, better the
chances that they will well get along with, and feel comfortable to communicate with each other. The most
cohesive group is one where members are more homogeneous in terms of age, sex, education, marital status
etc. and they share certain attitudes, values, experiences, and other characteristics, which are common to
each other.
Success of Group : It is the success of the group which can make it cohesive. A realisation develops among
its members to avoid differences for achieving group goals. When groups are successful in achieving their
goals, they become especially attractive to their members, and group cohesiveness enhances.
Competition with Other Groups : Competition between groups in an organisation increases group
cohesiveness when it motivates members of each group to band together to achieve group goals. For this
reason, organisations often promote group cohesiveness by having work groups competition in the
organisation between /among groups over sales target, zero defect production, minimization of wastages;
etc. A group of production workers may compete to see which group can maintain the highest quality
standards, and groups of maintenance workers may compete to have the best attendance record. Giving
groups names and publicising also encourage healthy competition, which groups are doing extraordinarily
well.
Group Size : Group size is an important determinant of group structure . Size of the group is determined by
the number of members who constitute a group. The size of group influences group’s overall behaviour. In
case size of group is large, it affects the productivity, commitment of group members towards group, which is
called social loafing.
Social Loafing : When individuals work in a group, it sometimes becomes difficult to assess and identify an
individual’s contribution to group performance by the other group members or by the supervisors under
whom they work. For example, group of workers who are jointly responsible for quality control in an
organisation can not be individually assigned to particular areas but have to work together. When individuals
work in groups, where their performances are not readily observable, there is a strong possibility for social
loafing, i.e., the tendency of individuals to exert less effort when they work in a group than when they work
alone.
Social loafing has tremendous impact upon group effectiveness. The efforts, and performance of individuals
in a group tend to be highest when outcomes of such as praise and pay are administered to members
individually contingent on the level of their individual performance. Since in a group, so many people are
working together, their individual levels of performance cannot be identified easily and evaluated by a
supervisor; therefore, members in a group realize that he will not receive any positive outcomes for
performing at a low level. Due to nonexistence of connection between inputs and outcomes, the motivation
level of member in the group can be lower.
Social loafing also occurs in workers who think that their own efforts are unimportant or not really needed,
and this belief lowers their level of motivation. Thus, social loafing is a serious problem for work groups
because it results in a process loss that lowers group performance. When social loafing occurs, actual group
performance is lower than potential performance. An individual develops an attitude to work individually
than the group.
Due to social loafing, sometime, some group members suggest other members of the group to reduce their
efforts as well. Which is consistent with the equity theory of motivation, and suggests that workers who
perceive inequity are motivated to try to restore equity by balancing their input/output ratios with the ratios
of the members of other group with whom he feels as equal competitor. In order to reduce the social loafing,
the groups are kept as small as possible.
Group Composition : The composition of a group is influenced by several characteristics, which are similar
among the group members. In a homogeneous group, several common characteristics can be demographic
characteristics such as age, sex, socioeconomic and cultural environment, education background and
psychological characteristics such as; personality traits, skills, abilities, attitudes, values, belief influence
them to form the group. However, in a heterogeneous group, there exists a lot of differences over these
characteristics. Therefore, while a homogeneous groups is characterised by similarity, a heterogeneous
group is characterised by diversity. The effects of group composition on the behaviour and performance of
individual members are too complex to ascertain and there is less research on it. However, it is true that
employees who are alike and similar to each other get along well with others. Therefore, the members of
homogeneous groups find it simple to share information, have lower levels of conflict, and have relatively
fewer problems in communication and coordination than the members of the heterogeneous groups.
Therefore, the performance and goal attainment of homogeneous groups is too high than that of
heterogeneous groups. Since group members normally like to get along with each other in homogeneous
groups, their motivation and satisfaction level is high.
Group Status : Depending upon the tasks performed by a group in an organisation; it has its importance
and status in an organisation. Though it is not expressed but status of a group is implicitly agreed-upon. For
example, a top-management team has a very high status as it not only sets organisational goals but also
determines how has the organisation to achieve them. Thus, more important a task performed by a group or a
group’s, the higher is its status in the organisation. The status of group in organisation motivates its members
to perform at a high level.
Group Roles : The structure of the group specifies the rules of its roles of the members to facilitate the
control of behaviour. It is the role, which tells group members about what are they expected to do. Role
enables the group to hold its members accountable for their behaviour and provide the group with a standard
through which the behaviour of the individual member and the group as a whole can be evaluated. Role
relationships may be formally specified in a written job description that describes about how is a role
occupant expected to interact with others to accomplish the group’s or organisation’s goals.
Written Rules : To control the behaviours of its members, to ensure high levels of performance and the
attainment of group goals, every effective group need to establish written rules. Written rules specify
behaviours that are required by group members and behaviours that are forbidden. Written rules have several
advantages in controlling and managing behaviour and performance of the members of the group. Rules help
the groups to ensure that when and how will their members perform their assigned task that contribute to
group and organisational effectiveness and avoid behaviours that impair performance and goal attainment.
The rules help newcomers to learn the right way to perform their roles. It develops at any stage of its
development. Normally rules developed at early stages are often changed or abandoned as the nature of the
group’s work, group goals, or organisational goals changes.
Norms develop when members in a group share a common idea of acceptable behaviour, which, monitor
each other’s behaviour in the group. Many norms develop because several members bring their past
experiences from other groups and from other organisations. Sometimes some critical incidents in the life of
the organisation may also set the norm for the group.
The first and the most commonly used criteria for conformity of the group norms is compliance. It is
assenting to a norm in order to attain rewards or avoid punishment. A realisation is developed among them
that the compliance of norm will bring certain benefits and ignoring it will bring certain costs. Groups put
tremendous pressure on the members to change their attitude and behaviour for the conformity of group
norms.
Merits of Group Decisions : Following are the merits of group decision making:
• The old saying, two heads are better than one also applies to group decision making . While taking the
decisions an individual has limited knowledge, capability, ideas and alternatives. In case there is
consensus among the members of a group, group decision can be better than the individual decisions.
• Group decisions are based on more knowledge, experiences and information of several members of the
group . As a result, it improves the quality of decision. At the time of decision making, they take into
account more alternatives.
• As more people are involved in the decision making process, it develops we feeling among the
members, which ultimately enhances the commitment, satisfaction and participation level of members to
implement the decision.
• Group decision facilitates personality development and awareness of the members of the group about the
on going activities of the organisation. It also exposes them to the constraints existing in the organisation.
As a result, they work to implement the decision whole heartedly in order to achieve the group as well
as organisational goals.
Limitations of Groups Decisions : Group decisions are not free from their limitations. Following are some
of the major limitations of group decisions.
• It is time consuming to arrive at a consensus when decision is to be taken by the group. It happens due
to complexity of the problems, personality differences and politics within the group.
• Confidentiality may not be maintained in case of group decisions.
• Group decision can be dominated by a few members, which ultimately affects its spirit and effectiveness.
• In group decision, no body likes to share any responsibility, that is why sometimes it comes out to be a
heartless, ineffective and delayed decision.
• The problem of group think where members may avoid to be too harsh towards the fellow member
could also hinder the group decision making. It is possible when the group is more cohesive.
…
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
……
…
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
……
…
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
……
…
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
……
Note : These questions will help you to understand the unit better. Try to write answers for them. Do
not submit your answers to the university for assessment. These are for your practice only.