Applications of Blockchain Technology in Banking Finance
Applications of Blockchain Technology in Banking Finance
Applications of Blockchain Technology in Banking Finance
net/publication/327230927
CITATIONS READS
14 19,692
2 authors, including:
Shailak Jani
Parul Universiy
11 PUBLICATIONS 37 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Shailak Jani on 26 August 2018.
Abstract- A new disruptive force of digital technology is changing the business models and increasingly
becoming a crucial factor around the world. Blockchain technology is generating significant interest across
a wide range of industries in India. As the field of applications for Blockchain grows, industry leaders are
customizing and tailoring the technology to fit multiple use cases. The Blockchain technology is
responsible for developing a next step in the decentralized approach for creating applications. This paper
aims at explaining the architecture of Blockchain Technology as well as how it works. Besides various
features of the Blockchain, the benefits derived from it are also discussed. The use cases and Blockchain fit
assessment has also been performed for few banking transactions. In the last section we also have a look at
the security aspects of the Blockchain.
1 INTRODUCTION
Blockchain, mostly known as the backbone technology behind Bitcoin, is one of the emerging technologies
currently in the market attracting lot of attentions from enterprises, start-ups and media. Blockchain has the
potential to transform multiple industries and make processes more democratic, secure, transparent, and efficient.
With high volumes of data getting generated every day owing to digitization of records, it becomes important for
every organization to effectively manage the security threats and achieve significant cost efficiencies. This is
where Blockchain, with its promises of decentralized ownership, immutability and cryptographic security of data,
is catching the attention of the C-suite executives. Multiple use cases are also getting explored across industries as
everyone has started realising the disruptive potential of this technology. Financial players are the first movers to
capitalize on this technology even though it is still in a nascent stage. A study by the World Economic Forum
predicts banks and regulators around the world are poised to experiment multiple Blockchain prototypes in 2017.
With 90+ central banks engaged in Blockchain discussion globally, 2500+ patents filed over the last three years
and 80% of the banks predicted to initiate Blockchain and distributed ledger technology (DLT) projects by 2017,
the Blockchain technology is on its course to become the new normal in the world of financial services. Many
companies, from a plethora of nonfinancial services industries like telecom Cyber Security, Supply Chain
Management, Forecasting, Insurance Industry, Private transport and Ride Sharing, Cloud Storage, Crowd
Funding, Voting, Governance, Energy Management, Retail, Real estate are on its way to establish the potential
Blockchain use cases to positively disrupt their traditional business models or already implemented their pilot
Blockchain use cases.
2 LITERATURE REVIEW
3. WHAT IS BLOCKCHAIN
A Blockchain is a digital, immutable, distributed ledger that chronologically records transactions in near real
time. The prerequisite for each subsequent transaction to be added to the ledger is the respective consensus of
the network participants (called nodes), thereby creating a continuous mechanism of control regarding
manipulation, errors, and data quality. It creates a digital ledger of transactions and thereby allowing to share it
among a distributed network of computers and it also maintains a continuously-growing list of records called
generally called "blocks" which are secured from tampering and revision. A blockchain implementation
comprises of two kinds of records: blocks and transactions. In each block contains a timestamp and a link to a
previous block is provided by the secure hash algorithm. The prime advantage is that it uses cryptography
which allows different users to modify the transactions on a secured network each one accessing their node of
data. If majority of nodes agree that the transaction performed looks valid, identifying information which
matches the blockchain's history and thus a new block is added to the chain. Blockchain configurations are
divided depending on the type and size of the network and then majorly by the use case of a particular
company.
The two types of blockchain are public and private. Ledgers are public if:
1. Anyone can write data, without permission granted by another authority.
2. Anyone can read data, without permission granted by another authority
For example, bitcoin is designed as a ‘anyone-can-write' blockchain, where participants can add to the ledger
without needing approval, there is no superior authority to decide, and it imbues a defence mechanisms against
attacks. As a result there is an increased cost and complexity in implementing this blockchain.
In Private Blockchain network the participants are known and trusted and there is a level of confidentiality. For
example, in a conglomerate, many of the mechanisms aren't needed or they are replaced with legal binding
contracts making everyone whoever has signed the contract to abide to these rules. It rapidly changes the
technical decisions used to build the solution.
3.1 Need for Blockchain:
The major question that arises is to why use blockchain when already the market has flourishing plethora of
other databases. What substantial importance it holds against the competing products. For this let's understand
the problem with the existing systems.
(i) Decentralization: Rather than one central authority overpowering others in the ecosystem, blockchain
explicitly distributes control amongst all peers in the transaction chain.
(ii) Digital signature: Blockchain enables an exchange of transactional value using public keys by the
mechanism of a unique digital sign i.e. code for decryption known to everyone on the network and private
keys known only to the owner to create ownership.
(iii) Mining: In a distributed system every user mines and digs deep into the data which is then evaluated
according to the cryptographic rules and it also acknowledges miners for confirmation and verification of
the transactions.
(iv) Data integrity: Complex algorithms and agreement among users ensures that transaction data, once
agreed upon, cannot be tampered with and thus remains unaffected. Data stored on blockchain acts as a
single version of truth for all parties involved hence reducing the risk of fraud.
As described above the block chain is nothing but a distributed shared decentralized public ledger which is
open to all. It is a data structure which is perceived to be robust and immutable. The essence of the
blockchain as showcased in its most famous implementation to date is that the data is replicated. Every
participant in the network has the same list of bitcoin transactions. In a blockchain we check if the ledger is
verifiable by a majority of the participants in the network. In the bitcoin network, this majority of
participants is replaced by important members designated as the Validators in the networks. These validator
nodes checks and then pass around the payments and the block data. This is because to maintain the
essence of the blockchain philosophy, the bitcoin system aim to decentralized, thus not giving control to
one single authority.
The working of a blockchain be it public or private is as described below:
Banks across the country have successfully initiated collaboration with specialized firms (Fintech) and/or
consulting firms to build proof-of-concepts and explore various potential use-cases. This implies the seriousness
of banks towards the Blockchain technology and its eagerness to understand how Blockchain can address and
resolve few pain points in the current state process.
6.1 Major issues that banks face today
The Indian banking industry today is faced with issues such as rising costs of operations, increasing
susceptibility to fraudulent attacks on centralized servers and challenges in ensuring transparency. All this,
primarily because most of the banking transactions – from opening customer accounts to making global
payments – may require intensive manual processing and documentation, involve costly intermediaries and is
time consuming as these transactions need to be validated by various participants at various point in time
causing the delay thereby resulting in almost lack of fraud proof real time solution.
6.2 What are banks looking for?
Banks are continuously exploring new ways to perform transactions quicker for an enhanced customer service,
while ensuring cost efficiency in its operations and assuring transparency to customers and regulators.
For this, Blockchain potentially provides a solution for banks as it inherently helps eliminate intermediaries,
maintain immutable log of transactions and also facilitates real-time execution of transactions. This could
potentially reduce the TAT for banking transaction, reducing costs of manual work, and leading to enhanced
customer service and satisfaction. Like any other industry, choosing the right ‘use case' is the key for Banks to
leverage full value of Blockchain.
6.3 The Blockchain Fit Assessment Framework
Based on the above discussion of what are the current pain points of Banking Industry and benefits of
blockchain, a Blockchain Assessment Framework is developed to evaluate whether a particular process or use-
case is the right fit for a Blockchain based solution. For a process or a use-case to classify as Blockchain-fit,
majority of the questions provided in the framework need to be answered in the affirmative. As we can see from
the framework, each of the evaluation factors uncovers a pain point in the current state process, which could be
resolved by a feature of the Blockchain solution. The resulting impact of implementing a full-fledged
Blockchain solution is summarized below:
Factor Assessment Framework Impact of Blockchain Fit
Intermediary • High fees for intermediary? Blockchain's distributed ledger technology
• Latency due to processing through facilitates disintermediation, thereby reducing
intermediary? costs and lowering latency.
• Does the intermediary exist due to lack
of trust?
Transparency • Are multiple participants involved? The hash/ pointers of the records written on the
• Does increase in transparency into the Blockchain are immutable and irreversible, not
transaction help the participants allowing modifications and eliminating risk of
fraud.
Information • Is the same information being stored in Blockchain's distributed ledger and consensus
Storage multiple locations? mechanism allows data consistency across
• Is data consistency an issue? multiple participants.
Manual • Does the process involve manual Blockchain maintains automated audit trail of
Processing operations? transactions, thereby reducing manual
• Is the cost of Reconciliation high? processing for data validations and
reconciliations.
Trust • Is there trust among participants? Smart contracts allow codification of business
• Do multiple participants have the right rules, validations and reconciliation, thereby
to modify transactions? reducing manual processing.
• Is there a risk of fraudulent transactions?
Documentation • Is the documentation paper-based? Smart contracts allow business validations and
• Is there a large number of documents / automated reconciliation for straight through
reports required to be generated? processing.
Time • Will the transactions benefit from being Blockchain enables the near real-time settlement
Sensitivity real-time or synchronous? of recorded transactions, reducing risk and
providing an enhanced customer experience.
7. USE-CASES OR PROCESSES WHERE BLOCKCHAIN CAN PLAY A KEY ROLE
Presented below are some specific use cases, where we believe that Blockchain can play a key role for helping
Indian banks and financial institutions realize significant benefits.
7.1 Consortium Banking
Corporations undertake multiple large projects such as development of roads, train systems, airports, factories,
new business centres, etc., which requires large-scale financing. Procuring these large funds necessitate the
institutions to come together to form consortium and diversify the financial risk among its members. Such
participation in lending will enable a bank to limit the commitment in respect of any one party. The leader bank
or members by rotation could do the work of inspection and verification of securities.
Various regulatory prescriptions regarding conduct of consortium / multiple banking / syndicate arrangements
were withdrawn by Reserve Bank of India in October 1996 with a view to introducing flexibility in the credit
delivery system and to facilitate smooth flow of credit. However, Central Vigilance Commission, Government
of India, in the light of frauds involving consortium / multiple banking arrangements which have taken place
recently, has expressed concerns on the working of Consortium Lending and Multiple Banking Arrangements in
the banking system. The Commission has attributed the incidence of frauds mainly to the lack of effective
sharing of information about the credit history and the conduct of the account of the borrowers among various
banks.
We have examined this landscape using our assessment framework and find a near-perfect candidate for
adoption of a Blockchain based solution.
Factor Assessment Framework Consortium Banking Fit
Intermediary • High fees for intermediary? Yes – agents & intermediaries are appointed at
• Latency due to processing high fees to manage and administer the
through intermediary? process.
• Does the intermediary exist due
to lack of trust?
Transparency • Are multiple participants Yes – consortium members seek transparency
involved? customer's rating, loan administering, etc.
• Does increase in transparency while customers seek transparency in
into the transaction help the underwriting.
participants?
Information • Is the same information being Yes – customer information has to be gathered
Storage stored in multiple locations? from multiple sources for underwriting. Each
• Is data consistency an issue? member also stores a copy of the customer
details
Manual • Does the process involve Yes – the entire lifecycle is very paper
Processing manual operations? intensive with customer details, negotiated
• Is the cost of Reconciliation terms and conditions among members, etc
high?
Trust • Is there trust among Yes – multiple participants are involved in the
participants? transactions including agents, customers,
• Do multiple participants have consortium members, etc. who may not be well
the right to modify transactions? known to each other, causing a lack of trust.
• Is there a risk of fraudulent
transactions?
Documentation • Is the documentation paper- Yes – There are multiple documentations
based? required at consortium formation, as well as
• Is there a large number of payment with a lot of validations for bills,
documents / reports required to be items of purchase, etc. This is not due to
generated? regulatory reporting requirement.
Time • Will the transactions benefit Yes – the turnaround time can be reduced and
Sensitivity from being real-time or risk lowered if payment settlements become
synchronous? real time.
TO BE
7.2 Payments
The Indian banking sector has been growing successfully, innovating and trying to adopt and implement
electronic payments to enhance the banking system. Though the Indian payment systems have always been
dominated by paper-based transactions, e-payments are not far behind. Ever since the introduction of e-
payments in India, the banking sector has witnessed growth like never before.
Looking at the nature of today’s payment processing services, it makes it difficult to follow the movements of
money. Even with current Know Your Customer rules, it can be challenging to link the name on a bank account
to an identifiable person or company – though new “beneficial ownership” rules may make it easier in the U.S.
In some countries, secrecy rules prevents banks from revealing financial information about their customers to
foreign regulators.
We have examined this landscape using our assessment framework and find a near-perfect candidate for
adoption of a Blockchain based solution.
KYC processes are generally repetitive, inconsistent, and duplicated, leading to high administrative overheads
and costs. Currently KYC documents are: i) Collected and stored internally, using a document management
system or internal database ii) Shared with multiple external agencies for validation on an individual basis iii)
Updated by banks in their internal repository upon successful validation and reported to central agencies.
However, initiatives by private entities such as The Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial
Telecommunication (SWIFT), banking consortiums, and government bodies have led to an upsurge in the
number of KYC registries. These registries act as centralized repositories that store all documents and
information related to KYC compliance, whereas the central registry stores digitized data tagged to a unique
identification number for each customer. Every bank and financial institution has to perform the KYC process
individually and upload the validated information and documents to the central registry. By using the unique ID,
banks can access the stored data to perform due diligence whenever customers request for a new service within
the same banking relationship or from another bank.
Factor Assessment Framework Payments Fit
Intermediary • High fees for intermediary? NO – intermediaries as such are not
• Latency due to processing through present.
intermediary?
• Does the intermediary exist due to
lack of trust?
Transparency • Are multiple participants involved? Yes – applicant, company, bank,
• Does increase in transparency into government, etc. are involved in the
the transaction help the participants? transaction. Higher transparency
would increase trust in the system,
and speed up the process.
Information • Is the same information being Yes – common information is stored
Storage stored in multiple locations? across the participants such as
• Is data consistency an issue? banks, companies, government.
Manual • Does the process involve manual Yes – it is required while verifying
Processing operations? the documents. Manual processing is
• Is the cost of Reconciliation high? performed by everyone who accepts
KYC.
Trust • Is there trust among participants? Yes – multiple participants are
• Do multiple participants have the involved in the transactions and
right to modify transactions? make changes/ issue instructions.
• Is there a risk of fraudulent Since these may be unknown to each
transactions? other, there is a lack of trust and
possibility of fraudulent activities.
Documentation • Is the documentation paper-based? Yes – The applicant statements are
• Is there a large number of all paper-based. This is not due to
documents / reports required to be regulatory reporting requirements.
generated?
Time • Will the transactions benefit from Yes – it will help in providing
Sensitivity being real-time or synchronous? enhanced customer experience, and
reduce the exposure risk of banks.
Current Pain Points How Blockchain Can Help
Data integration Intra-bank applications
Expensive technology Inter-bank applications
Evolving regulation Centralized blockchain-based KYC
Fragmented approach Fraud proof
KYC – using Blockchain Technology
8. NEW CONCERNS RELATED TO IMPLEMENTATION OF BLOCK CHAIN
9. CONCLUSION
Although the potential of Blockchain is widely claimed to be at par with early commercial Internet, banking
firms needs to understand the key features of the technology and how it can solve the current business issues as
on one hand, internet enabled exchange of data while on other, the Blockchain can involve exchange of value.
Banks need to identify opportunities, determine feasibility and impact, and test proof of concepts.
However, the questions around regulations will have to be resolved through focused discussions with competent
regulatory authorities and incorporation of their thought-process. . They concluded that regulators should
engage, intervene at early stage and shape the innovation. This will allow them to understand the technology,
assess the risk, and enable the tailor made solutions to their specific obstacles.
10. BIBLIOGRAPHY
[13] “Indian blockchain consortium BankChain selects Azureas cloud partner”. [Online]. Available
www.cryptoninjas.net/2017/06/12/indian-blockchain-consortium-bankchain-selects-azure-cloud-partner/
[14] P. Baruri, Blockchain Powered Financial Inclusion,2016, a Paper Published by Cognizant
[15] Can Blockchain Eliminate the Risk of Fraud in Payment Processing Services? [Online]. Available:
https://www.americanexpress.com/us/content/foreign-exchange/articles/can-blockchain-eliminate-fraud-in-
payment-processing-services/