Course Guide: RICS School of Built Environment
Course Guide: RICS School of Built Environment
Course Guide: RICS School of Built Environment
2020 – 2021
COURSE GUIDE
Course Title: Behavioral Aspects for Built Environment-II
Course Code: BS-604
Semester: 2nd
Programme: MBA CPM/MBA CEQS/ MBAREUI
Course Coordinator: Gautam Pant & Rekee Prasher
1. Course Objective(s)
The role of human skills is critical for the successful career of a management student. While it is the
functional skills which get a student a job, it is his/her human skills which help him/her to survive
and succeed in the job. The objective of this course is to introduce students to the advanced
processes of human behaviour in groups and its impact on the workplace in built environment.
4. Prerequisites:
Familiarity with concepts taught in courses pertaining to behavioural sciences in the previous
semesters.
SLO Associated
Module Weightag
Covered Competencies
e (%)
Module I- Team work and team building
Team work and team building - What is a team? Types of 20% 1 M009
teams, Stages of team development, Characteristic of
functional teams
Module II Motivation
Motivation: Early theories of motivation- Maslow hierarchy of 2
15% T006
needs , Theory X and theory Y, Two factor theory, McClelland’s
theory of needs.
e-Content:
This aims at improving self-learning among the students, with an element of critical thinking and
problem solving. Use of online-learning content and virtual classroom facilities would be used. The
course delivery team would identify certain content from the syllabus to be delivered as e-Content.
Sessions would be organised for discussion and assessment of learning outcome. The following four
modes would be used wholly or partially while delivering eLearning.
Online-Learning Content, Virtual Classroom
Online-Tutoring, Online-Coaching, Online-Mentoring
Collaborative Learning (Discussion Forum)
Online Assessment
Collaborative learning:
Use of LMS/MS Teams for collaborative learning, where inbuilt forums would be used to keep an
open discussion log for comments and keeping track of the progress of the PSDA component of each
group.
Case Studies:
Case studies would provide insights about the practical aspects related to this course and would be
referred time to time in lectures as well tutorials for enhanced learning experience. Discussions on
the case studies would be encouraged in the sessions.
7. List of Professional Skill Development Activities (PSDA):
a. The PSDA work will include understanding how concepts of Organizational behavior and
Human resource management are used in an organization. Students are supposed to
choose companies preferably in the built environment sector and study them:
i. Choose any two groups with a construction / real estate company, identify the
challenges faced by them. Use the understanding of concepts to suggest solutions
for the company. In this process the students are supposed to analyze the
challenges in light with the concepts associated with groups/ teams , motivation ,
emotional intelligence / creativity.
8. Assessment Description
9. Assessment Schedule
Assessment
S. No. Assessment Type Submission week
Type
1. Continuous Assessment of PSDA Component End of week 11 Divergent
2. Home Assignment Presentation End of week 11 Divergent
Guided
3. Viva- voce Week 13 & 14
Divergent
4. Mid Term Test Week 8 or 9 Convergent
Week 1 Introductory lecture – Discussing Course Guide, Assessment and recap of the
previous semester
Week 3 Groups and teams, role and need for teams, characteristics of functional team;
Types and teams and stages of development of teams
Week 5 Goal setting theory, reinforcement theory of motivation, Equity theory, expectancy
theory of motivation,
Week 6 Emotional Intelligence: the meaning of emotional intelligence, The ability model of
EI
Week 9 Emotional Intelligence: The trait model of EI, The mixed model of EI, EI &
Interpersonal relationships, Self- assessments on EI
Week 11 Revision
Week 12 Viva
Week 13 Viva
Week 14 Viva
RICS-SBE/01/CM/S001/R03
Revised on: 26-06-2020
Assessment
type/PSDA
PSDA
Assessment
Part i
Home
Assignment
Mid-term Test
End-term
Examination
Theory Assessment:
Home Mid-term End Term
Components Attendance
Assignment Test Examination
Linkage of PSDA with Internal
25% ( of total marks)
Assessment Component, if any
Total Weightage (%) 20% 15% 5% 60%
Lab / Practical / Studio Assessment: NA
Notional Hours:
Lecture Contact 15
Tutorial Contact 0
Self-Work 30
Field Work 0
Assessment 10
Total Hours 55
13. Indicative performance threshold for course work
Qualitative Value Performance description
Clearly demonstrates a highly creative, critical and thought- provoking
understanding of the topic.
Novel and complex problems are solved with reference to theory and
practice.
Provides clear evidence of originality and independence of thought
and with an exceptional ability to develop highly systematic and logical
80% and Above
or insightful argument, solution or evaluation.
(Outstanding)
Demonstrates exceptional ability in the appropriate use of the
relevant literature, theory, methodologies, practices, tools, techniques
etc., to analyze and synthesize the given problem.
Shows an exceptionally high level of clarity, focus and strength in
communication.
The writing perfectly accomplishes the objectives of the assignment.
Clearly demonstrates a persuasive, critical and thorough
understanding of the topic.
Some evidence of novel and complex problems solved with reference
to theory and practice.
Provides evidence of independence of thought and clearly
75 – 79% demonstrates the ability to develop a highly systematic and logical or
(Excellent) Insightful argument, solution or evaluation of the problem.
Demonstrates excellence in the appropriate use of the relevant
literature, theory, methodologies, practices, tools, techniques etc., to
analyze and synthesize the given problem.
Shows a high level of clarity, focus and strength in communication.
The writing perfectly accomplishes the objectives of the assignment.
Clearly demonstrates a well-developed, critical and comprehensive
understanding of the topic.
Provides some evidence of independence of thought and clearly
demonstrates the ability to develop a systematic and logical or insightful
argument, solution or evaluation of the given problem.
68 – 74%
Demonstrates a high degree of competence in the appropriate use of
(Good)
the relevant literature, theory, methodologies, practices, tools,
techniques, etc., to analyze and synthesize the given problem.
Shows clarity, focus and strength in communication
Accomplishes the goals of the assignment with an overall effective
approach.
Demonstrates a systematic and substantial understanding of the
topic.
Demonstrates the ability to develop a systematic argument or
solution to the given problem.
60 – 67%
Demonstrates a significant degree of competence in the appropriate
(Above Average)
use of the relevant literature, theory, methodologies, practices, tools,
techniques etc., to analyze and synthesize the given problem.
Provides evidence of clarity and focus in communication.
Minimally accomplishes the goals of the assignment.
52 – 59% Provides evidence of a systematic understanding of the key aspects of
(Average) the topic.
Demonstrates the ability to present a sufficiently structured argument
or solution to the given problem.
Demonstrates an acceptable degree of competence in the
appropriate use of the relevant literature, theory, methodologies,
practices, tools, techniques etc., to analyze and synthesize the given
problem
Provides evidence of effective communication.
Minimally accomplishes the majority of the goals of the assignment.
Provides evidence of some understanding of key aspects of the topic
and some ability to present an appropriate argument or solution to the
given problem.
45 -51% Demonstrates some competence in the appropriate use of the
(Satisfactory) relevant literature, theory, methodologies, practices, tools, techniques,
etc. to analyze and synthesize the given problem.
Provides some evidence of effective communication.
Minimally accomplishes the majority of the goals of the assignment
Demonstrates limited competence in the appropriate use of the
relevant literature, theory, methodologies, practices, tools, techniques,
40 – 44%
etc. to analyze and synthesize the given problem.
(Border Line)
Provides limited evidence of effective communication.
Fails to accomplish the majority of the goals of the assignment
Less than 40%
Work that is unacceptable. Erroneous/wrong, missing, extremely
(Fail)
17. Plagiarism
“Plagiarism is defined as presenting another person’s work as one’s own work. Presentation includes
copying or reproducing it without the acknowledgement of the source.”
Plagiarism involves copying of phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or longer extracts from
published or unpublished work (including from the Internet) that exceeds the boundaries of the
legitimate cooperation without acknowledgement of the source. Plagiarism could be intentional
(dishonest plagiarism) or non-intentional (negligent plagiarism). This definition also applies for
figures and figure legends and for tables and table legends which you copy into your text.
It is mandatory that each course work shall be checked for plagiarism through Turnitin or similar
software before submission. The content which is based on existing published work must come from
properly quoted material and from the references cited section. After checking the accuracy of the
citations and references of such content the plagiarism report should not return similarity index of
more than 15% in any circumstance. However, if the matching text is one continuous block, the
index of 15% could shall be considered plagiarism. Any report with higher than this percentage
matching must be explained by the student. The details of copy rights, professional ethics are given
in Plagiarism Prevention Policy of the University.
Referencing Guidelines
Referencing helps to acknowledge other peoples’ ideas and helps the reader/instructor to locate the
cited references easily, also to evaluate the interpretation of our ideas. It reduces risk of plagiarism
(i.e. taking other peoples’ thoughts, ideas or writings and using them as though they are your own).
Direct quotations, paraphrases, facts and figures, ideas and theories both from published and
unpublished sources must be referenced. The sources for written (text) and graphic material may
include books, journal or magazine articles, newspapers, company, government or institutional
reports, websites or personal communication. Please note improper or no referencing will be
penalized in terms of marks awarded.