International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management

The impact of climate change on groundwater resources

Harrie‐Jan Hendricks Franssen,
Article information:
To cite this document:
Harrie‐Jan Hendricks Franssen, (2009) "The impact of climate change on groundwater resources",
International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, Vol. 1 Issue: 3, pp.241-254, https://
Downloaded by Universidad Autonoma de Baja California At 14:12 20 September 2017 (PT)

doi.org/10.1108/17568690910977465
Permanent link to this document:
https://doi.org/10.1108/17568690910977465
Downloaded on: 20 September 2017, At: 14:12 (PT)
References: this document contains references to 76 other documents.
To copy this document: [email protected]
The fulltext of this document has been downloaded 1017 times since 2009*
Users who downloaded this article also downloaded:
(2009),"Climatic changes and groundwater resources in Africa", International Journal of
Climate Change Strategies and Management, Vol. 1 Iss 2 pp. 133-145 <a href="https://
doi.org/10.1108/17568690910955603">https://doi.org/10.1108/17568690910955603</a>
(2013),"Modeling hydrological impacts of climate change in different climatic zones", International Journal
of Climate Change Strategies and Management, Vol. 5 Iss 3 pp. 344-365 <a href="https://doi.org/10.1108/
IJCCSM-04-2012-0024">https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-04-2012-0024</a>

Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by emerald-srm:464534 []
For Authors
If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for
Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines
are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information.
About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.com
Emerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company
manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as
providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services.
Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee
on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive
preservation.

*Related content and download information correct at time of download.

 The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at
www.emeraldinsight.com/1756-8692.htm

Groundwater
The impact of climate change resources
on groundwater resources
Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen
Institute of Environmental Engineering, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland 241
Received 22 December 2008
Abstract Revised 27 February 2009
Downloaded by Universidad Autonoma de Baja California At 14:12 20 September 2017 (PT)

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to indicate the limitations of the studies that address the Accepted 11 March 2009
impact of climate change on groundwater resources and to suggest an improved approach.
Design/methodology/approach – A general review, both from a groundwater hydrological and a
climatological viewpoint, is given, oriented on the impact of climate change on groundwater resources.
Findings – The impact of climate change on groundwater resources is not the subject of many
studies in the scientific literature. Only rarely sophisticated downscaling techniques are applied to
downscale estimated global circulation model (GCM) future precipitation series for a point or region of
interest. Often it is not taken into account that different climate models calculate considerably different
precipitation amounts (conceptual uncertainty). The joint downscaling of the meteorological variables
that govern potential evapotranspiration (ET) is never done in the context of a study that assessed the
impact of climate change on groundwater resources. It is desirable that actual ET is calculated in
(groundwater) hydrological models on a physical basis, i.e. by coupling the energy and water balance
at the Earth’s surface.
Originality/value – This review signalises a number of problems with published studies on the
impact of climate change on groundwater resources. In many studies the method to downscale
meteorological variables from a climate model to a hydrological model is not adequate. ET is often
calculated in a strongly simplified manner and not all hydrological processes are modelled in a fully
coupled fashion. More sophisticated downscaling approaches, physically based schemes to calculate
ET and well-calibrated, integrative hydrological models are needed.
Keywords Global warming, Groundwater, Precipitation
Paper type General review

1. Introduction
Changes in precipitation and evapotranspiration (ET), at different spatial and temporal
scales, will affect the global water cycle (Brutsaert, 2005). Surface water bodies like
rivers respond fast to climate change, as the residence time of water in rivers is
relatively low. The effects of climate change on river discharge have been more
intensively studied than the impact of climate change on aquifers. For instance, it is
expected that the summer river discharge of the main European rivers will decrease,
whereas winter river discharge is likely to increase with more severe floods (Arpe and
Roeckner, 1999; Pfister et al., 2004).
Assessing the impact of climate change (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change (IPCC), 2007) on groundwater resources is an important issue that has not
received too much attention in the scientific literature until now. Aquifers react much
slower to climate change than surface water bodies, but on the long-term the average International Journal of Climate
groundwater level might be much lower or higher than under the current conditions, Change Strategies and Management
Vol. 1 No. 3, 2009
pp. 241-254
q Emerald Group Publishing Limited
The author thanks two anonymous reviewers and Fritz Stauffer for helpful comments on an 1756-8692
earlier version of this paper. DOI 10.1108/17568690910977465
 IJCCSM with serious implications for drinking water supply, for example. The drinking water
1,3 supply for a large part of the population on Earth relies on groundwater resources. It is
well known that certain aquifers in the past, during different climate conditions, had
much higher or lower groundwater levels than currently.
Aquifers for which the impact of climate change was studied are situated nearly
exclusively in Northern America (Cohen et al., 2006; Scibek and Allen, 2006a, b; Jyrkama
242 and Sykes, 2007; Loaiciga, 2003; Allen et al., 2004) and Europe (Eckhardt and Ulbrich,
2003; Woldeamlak et al., 2007). For an aquifer in southern British Columbia in Canada
only a small impact of climate change on groundwater levels is expected (Scibek and
Allen, 2006a), whereas Jyrkama and Sykes (2007) predicted an increased recharge for an
Downloaded by Universidad Autonoma de Baja California At 14:12 20 September 2017 (PT)

aquifer in Ontario (Canada). The Ellensburg basin in the state of Washington (USA) was
calculated to have a reduction of more than 25 per cent of the median annual recharge for
the scenario that the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere doubles, as compared
to the atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations in 1990 (Vaccaro, 1992). The extended
High-Plains aquifer (450,000 kilometer2 and underlying the states of South Dakota,
Wyoming, Colorado, Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma, Texas and New Mexico in the USA)
is expected to receive less recharge for all considered future climate series (Rosenberg
et al., 1999). The Edwards Balcones Fault Zone aquifer in Texas (USA) is also expected to
receive less recharge with severe impacts on water resources (Loaiciga et al., 2000).
Concerning Europe, for an aquifer close to Grenoble (France) ground water levels
were estimated to decrease up to four meters, making impossible the current practice of
irrigated agriculture in the future (Bouraoui et al., 1999). A chalk aquifer in Belgium
showed for some of the future climate scenarios drops in groundwater level of up to
seven metres (Brouyère et al., 2004; Woldeamlak et al., 2007). For the UK, particularly in
the Southern part a reduction in groundwater recharge is expected, in spite of the
increased winter rainfall (Arnell, 1998). In the exceptional warm and dry summer of
2003, in Switzerland fast decreases of groundwater levels were observed, for example in
a piezometer close to Uster, Canton of Zurich, the decrease was more than five metres in
only nine months (AWEL, 2004). The combination of high water demand and reduced
aquifer recharge, resulted in problems of water supply (e.g. in Winterthur). It is expected
that summers like 2003 will be rather common in Switzerland at the end of the
twenty-first century (Schär et al., 2004).
Green et al. (2007) estimated for two aquifers in Australia a large uncertainty
regarding future recharge to the groundwater. For the Mediterranean climate zone in
West Australia an increase of the recharge is likely, while for the subtropical climate
zone in Queensland a 37 per cent rainfall increase is likely to at least double the amount
of groundwater recharge.
With help of a water balance model a rough estimate of changes in soil moisture
availability over the continent of Africa was estimated for the period 2010-2039. Besides,
climate change, soil degradation is expected to have an important impact on reduced soil
moisture availability and reduced recharge to the groundwater over large parts of the
continent (Feddema and Freire, 2001). First rough assessments were also made of the
changes in groundwater recharge over Russia. Over large parts of Russia an increase of
the groundwater levels is expected during the period until 2025 (Semenov et al., 2004).
For the Pingtung Plain in Southwestern Taiwan available groundwater resources are
expected to decline during the next two decades (Hsu et al., 2007). The impact of
climate change on groundwater resources is of special concern in semi-arid regions.
 In these regions, already a water deficit exists and climate models expect a reduction of Groundwater
future precipitation amounts (for example in the Mediterranean area). In addition, in
these regions an important part of the drinking water is pumped from aquifers. The
resources
combination of a reduced aquifer recharge and a strongly increasing water demand
(Vörösmarty et al., 2000) makes the situation here especially delicate. For the coastal
Chaouia aquifer in Morocco, it is found that piezometric head levels decreased
considerably during the last decennia, due to increased water extraction and in spite of a 243
small increase in the amount of precipitation (Moustadraf et al., 2008).
Climate change can impact the groundwater levels through various processes that
affect the water balance. The hydrological water balance for a catchment can be
Downloaded by Universidad Autonoma de Baja California At 14:12 20 September 2017 (PT)

written as:
P ¼ ET þ R þ Q þ DS; ð1Þ
3 21 3 21
where P is precipitation [L T ], ET is evapotranspiration [L T ], R is discharge
(surface runoff and river discharge) [L 3T 2 1], Q is human water extraction [L 3T 2 1]
and DS is change in storage (positive if storage increases) [L 3T 2 1]. Under stationary
climate conditions, and over a longer time period, DS ¼ 0. Changing climate conditions
yield changes in precipitation, ET, discharge, water extraction and storage. These
storage changes affect the unsaturated and saturated zones and storage in the form of
snow and ice. If we consider the storage changes for a compartment like an aquifer, the
interactions with the other hydrological compartments also have to be considered.
Changing interactions with surface water bodies have a significant impact on changes
in aquifer storage and should be included in the aquifer water balance:
DS aquifer ¼ DP 2 DET 2 DR 2 DQ þ ðDLin 2 DLout Þ; ð2Þ
where Lin and Lout are fluxes from the surface water bodies (i.e. rivers and lakes) to the
aquifer and viceversa [L 3T 2 1]. Climate change assessment studies for groundwater
solve normally a distributed form of equation (2). However, DP and DET are normally
taken from climate simulations, and only if integrative hydrological models are used,
the other terms on the right-hand side of equation (2) are explicitly solved.
In the next sections, we focus on using DP and DET from GCM’s for assessing the
impact of future climate change on groundwater resources. The focus will be on the state of
the art of integrated models that predict this impact. Other aspects of climate change and
groundwater resources, like observed recent changes in groundwater levels or estimated
historical groundwater levels from paleoclimate data are not discussed here.

2. Changes in precipitation: uncertainty and downscaling

Coupled global atmosphere-ocean-sea ice-land models can help to predict the future
climate. The set of governing equations for atmospheric fluid motion is discretized by
finite difference or spectral methods and propagated forward in time, for example for
the next century. The maximum time step is limited so that the fastest disturbances
(gravity waves or jet streams; sound waves are filtered away from the equations)
cannot pass one grid cell in one time step. This in turn limits the maximum grid size
because of CPU limitations. Currently, most climate models have a typical resolution of
100-200 kilometer. This coarse grid resolution makes that various sub-grid processes
are not solved physically, but parameterised (Kalnay, 2003). These parameterisations
are verified experimentally (i.e. for the current weather and climate conditions).
 IJCCSM Processes that are parameterised are convection, cloud formation, land-surface
1,3 processes including hydrology, radiation and turbulence, among others. The coarse
resolution also limits the proper representation of the topography and soil and
vegetation properties. These simplifications especially impact the modelling of the
hydrological cycle in climate models.
Different climate models use different parameterisation schemes, have different
244 spatial discretizations and also different soil and vegetation properties (among others),
and therefore also give different climate predictions. The European study PRUDENCE
compared the simulations of the future European climate with a large number of
different climate models, and found large differences in the projected amounts of
Downloaded by Universidad Autonoma de Baja California At 14:12 20 September 2017 (PT)

precipitation (Déqué et al., 2007). For the IPCC A2 scenario, the precipitation predictions
for Northern Switzerland showed a considerable uncertainty. The 95 per cent
probability interval of summer precipitation around 2050 is between a decrease of 31 and
7 per cent. For winter precipitation, the variation is between 2 1 and þ 21 per cent (Frei,
2007). These confidence intervals capture some, but most probably not all of the
conceptual uncertainty. Coupled atmosphere-ocean-sea ice-land models are increasingly
used for seasonal predictions, and there it was found that a multi-model ensemble
approach gave better predictions than a single model ensemble approach, and covered
better the span of uncertainty (Hagedorn et al., 2005). For future climate predictions, the
uncertainty with respect to the evolution of greenhouse gas emissions is of course, an
additional relevant uncertain factor. Studies that assess the impact of climate change on
groundwater resources did in general not work with future climate scenarios from
different climate models.
Precipitation is calculated at the coarse grid of the climate model, and is affected by
the mentioned parameterizations and the smoothing of topography, soil and vegetation
properties. Precipitation estimated by a climate model has to be downscaled to the local
hydrological model.
Downscaling can be done with dynamical models or statistical methods. Dynamical
downscaling is carried out with regional climate models (RCMs) and the RCM is along its
boundaries forced by the global circulation model (GCM). The RCM calculates the future
climate on a higher resolution grid and is expected to give better results as the
representation of the topography and soil and vegetation properties is better than in a
(GCM). However, the RCM is embedded in the GCM and one-way coupled, which means
that the RCM cannot feedback on the global circulation. More over, even if a RCM is run
on a high-resolution grid there is still a need for statistical downscaling. There are two
main reasons why there is still a need for statistical downscaling:
(1) the spatial resolution of the RCM and the (groundwater) hydrological model do
not coincide; and
(2) bias in the RCM due to, for instance, the mentioned parameterizations.

The bias tends to show a complex temporal pattern. For example, often it is observed (by
comparing model simulations with observations (Frei et al., 2006) that the frequency of
precipitation events is overestimated, whereas the intensity is underestimated. For
Switzerland, it was found that convective precipitation is underestimated and
orographically enforced precipitation overestimated. If climate model predictions of
precipitation would only be corrected on the basis of the mean deviation between
simulated and measured precipitation, the bias of future precipitation would not be
 assessed correctly. To put a very simple example: if for instance for the current climate Groundwater
conditions both the contribution of orographically induced precipitation and convective resources
precipitation to the overall precipitation amount is 50 per cent, and the bias is,
respectively, þ 30 and 2 10 per cent, the overall bias is þ 10 per cent. If for future climate
conditions the contribution of the orographically induced precipitation reduces to
25 per cent and the convective precipitation increases to 75 per cent, the overall bias of
the simulated future time series would not be þ 10 but 0 per cent. 245
Statistical downscaling techniques link observations at a meteorological station with
the atmospheric flow pattern, for instance through methods like canonical correlation
analysis (Busuioc et al., 1999; Hertig and Jacobeit, 2007). Through the established links,
Downloaded by Universidad Autonoma de Baja California At 14:12 20 September 2017 (PT)

which are assumed to remain valid under a changing climate (but have a physical basis),
values for the meteorological variables of interest for the future can be obtained. For
instance, for estimating daily precipitation at a certain location, simulated fields of
specific humidity, pressure, divergence and vorticity at different levels in the
atmosphere at grid boxes surrounding the location, could be used as predictors. With
help of longer historical time series, it is also possible to investigate the stationarity of
these multivariate statistical relationships (Hertig and Jacobeit, 2007).
The more sophisticated downscaling techniques for precipitation like canonical
correlation analysis might yield considerably different future precipitation amounts
compared with simple bias corrections. Some hydrological studies which investigated
the impact of climate change dealt with this problem more seriously, for example by
comparing the simulation results of a GCM in a reference period (typically the present
climate) with a re-analysis data set (Scibek and Allen, 2006a) or a measured time series
(Loaiciga, 2003). Often, however, a simpler approach is followed and some very general
trends, extracted from a GCM, are used to generate future climate data. Many studies
that address the impact of climate change on groundwater resources, focus on the
influence of spatial variable processes in the soil, and their impact on percolation and
recharge, with a limited attention on obtaining a realistic representation of future time
series of meteorological forcing (Rosenberg et al., 1999; Woldeamlak et al., 2007; Jyrkama
and Sykes, 2007). Besides uncertainty and downscaling, there are other relevant issues
concerning precipitation. However, they are even more difficult to take into account and
were not included in studies of the assessment of climate change on groundwater
resources. One aspect is the temporal resolution of future precipitation. Even if the total
amount of precipitation is unchanged, a different distribution over the year might result
in a larger or smaller ET. It is also possible that an increase of extreme precipitation
intensities would result in a larger surface runoff and less-aquifer recharge.

3. Changes in potential ET
Climate change will also have an important impact on the ET from the Earth’s surface. As
a consequence, the terrestrial water cycle changes which on its turn has a strong feedback
on meteorological conditions, as documented in several recent studies (Seneviratne and
Stöckli, 2008). These changes are strongly related with changes in the soil moisture
contents. The water cycle and the energy cycle are coupled at the land surface by the soil
moisture content. For wet soils, a large part of the incoming radiation is used for ET
(latent heat flux), whereas for dry soils most of the energy is used for heating the air
(sensible heat flux). Therefore, soil moisture contents influence for example the formation
of convective storms (Betts et al., 1996; Eltahir, 1998; Schär et al., 1999; Betts, 2004),
 IJCCSM air temperature (Seneviratne et al., 2006a; Koster et al., 2006), vegetation functioning (Ciais
1,3 et al., 2005), and may have implications for seasonal forecasting (Koster and Suarez, 2001,
Seneviratne et al., 2006b). It is important to understand this feedback better and develop
better land-atmosphere models in order to improve the regional climate predictions.
Hydrological models calculate almost without exception ET conceptually, for
example by empirically based relations between:
246 .
the soil depth and ET; and
.
soil moisture content and the ratio actual ET/potential ET.

The necessary inputs to calculate potential ET are the measured radiation, wind speed,
Downloaded by Universidad Autonoma de Baja California At 14:12 20 September 2017 (PT)

vapour pressure and air temperature. If less input data are available simplified
formulations are used. Calculating potential ET from meteorological data might give
good results for observed meteorological data, but there are serious drawbacks using
future climate predictions as data input to calculate potential ET.
The net radiation, vapour pressure, air temperature and even the wind speed that are
calculated by the GCM or RCM will depend on the land-atmosphere scheme of the model.
The land-atmosphere scheme of a GCM divides the incoming net radiation over heating
of the air (sensible heat flux), heating of the ground (ground heat flux) or ET of water
(latent heat flux), and monitors the changes of the water storage in the soil compartment
(soil moisture content). In fact, the soil moisture content governs the division of the
incoming net radiation over the three different energy fluxes. The calculated sensible
and latent heat fluxes determine also whether convective clouds are formed, which
affects for example the incoming net radiation for the next time step. The
land-atmosphere models of GCM’s and RCM’s represent the hydrology strongly
simplified, have uniform parameter values for large areas and do not allow, for instance,
for lateral redistribution of water between grid cells. As the simulated meteorological
conditions close to the Earth’s surface are strongly affected by the simplified
representation of hydrology, the potential ET that would be estimated from it might
deviate significantly from the true value. Efforts are being made to improve the
representation of hydrology in GCMs. For example, recently the community land model
(CLM) was improved by explicitly accounting for groundwater in the land-atmosphere
scheme (Oleson et al., 2008; Stöckli et al., 2008).
Instead of getting the meteorological variables for calculating potential ET from the
GCM or RCM, an alternative could be to downscale directly the estimated actual ET by
the GCM or RCM. However, there are very few historical measurement data on actual ET
that would allow inferring statistical downscaling relationships. Since more than a
decade, a global network of eddy covariance data is collecting data on ET, but eddy
covariance data underestimate ET (Wilson et al., 2002; Barr et al., 2006), which seems to
be related to the missing of low-frequency turbulence and large eddies (Finigan et al.,
2003; Foken et al., 2006; Inagaki et al., 2006). The correction for the underestimation of ET
is not trivial and shows a complex relation with the atmospheric stability and wind
velocity (Hendricks Franssen et al., 2009). Also other processes, like foot print
heterogeneity (i.e. the heterogeneity around the flux tower; Göckede et al., 2008) and
advection introduce errors, which are typically dependent on the wind vector. More over,
the eddy covariance data also show considerable random measurement errors
(Richardson and Hollinger, 2005). Therefore, it is very difficult to relate GCM-simulated
ET for a large grid cell and measured ET (with systematic and random errors) for a small
 region in a meaningful manner, and the downscaling relationships are expected to be Groundwater
very complicated. resources
Altogether, currently it is believed that downscaling of the meteorological variables
from which potential ET is calculated, despite the limitations mentioned before, is a
more viable option than downscaling of actual ET. The joint statistical downscaling of
the relevant variables for calculating potential ET from a GCM or RCM to a
(groundwater) hydrological model is far from trivial. Not any of the studies that have 247
been published on the impact of climate change on groundwater resources used
sophisticated downscaling techniques to link GCM modelled potential ET and
“measured” potential ET.
Downloaded by Universidad Autonoma de Baja California At 14:12 20 September 2017 (PT)

4. Integrative hydrological modelling

Even if future potential ET is estimated from climate predictions and downscaling
techniques, still a sophisticated, integrative hydrological model is needed to calculate
actual ET. Such a hydrological model should be able to model the unsaturated and
saturated zones and interaction between surface water bodies and groundwater in a
fully coupled manner. It should also include the role of vegetation and processes like
bare soil evaporation, transpiration, interception, evaporation from intercepted water
and surface runoff.
The unsaturated zone plays a central role in the estimation of the impact of climate
change on groundwater resources, mainly because the soil moisture content is the main
factor that determines the Bowen ratio (the ratio between the sensible and latent heat
fluxes) and therefore the actual ET. This was discussed in the anterior section. The
modelling of processes in the unsaturated zone is also important for the timing of
the recharge, i.e. the delay that excess precipitation water takes to reach the aquifer.
Some studies suggest that modelling processes in the unsaturated zone is critical for an
accurate estimate of the recharge (Hunt et al., 2008).
The interaction between aquifers and surface water bodies play locally a very significant
role. For instance, the water balance of the aquifer below the city of Zurich in Switzerland
shows that by far the largest contribution of water comes from the river Limmat (Doppler
et al., 2007). The groundwater levels of such aquifers are strongly influenced by the river
stages. In order to assess the impact of climate change on those aquifers, it is essential to
estimate future time series of river stages as well (Scibek et al., 2007).
Surface runoff is also important to be included in the assessment of climate change
on groundwater resources because the fraction of precipitation that becomes surface
runoff for a certain area might be modified as a consequence of climate change. This
fraction might be different as consequence of changes in the precipitation intensity, the
temporal variation of the amount of precipitation (with for example more frequent
precipitation over nearly saturated soils in winter), vegetation or land cover, frozen soil
conditions and amount of precipitation that falls in the form of snow.
Other important aspects of the assessment of climate change on groundwater
resources, include changes in water extraction (e.g. because of changes in the needed
amount of irrigation water), land use changes (for example due to the vegetation
response to climate change) and changes to soil properties (Holman, 2006).
Integrative hydrological models can consider many of the mentioned processes. In
particular, physically based models like MIKE-SHE (Refsgaard et al., 1992) or
HYDROGEOSPHERE (Therrien and Sudicky, 1996) are interesting for assessing the
 IJCCSM impact of climate change on groundwater resources. An interesting development is that
1,3 MIKE-SHE also calculates the ET physically, i.e. by coupling the energy and water
balance at the Earth’s surface (Overgaard et al., 2006). In particular, a recent extension of
MIKE-SHE includes a two-layer, energy-based, land surface model (Overgaard, 2005).
MIKE-SHE was also tested for fully two-way coupling with atmospheric models and
used together with the RCM HIRHAM for simulations of regions in Denmark, the
248 Okavango Delta in Botswana and Panama (personal communication). Also, the
hydrological model HYDROGEOSPHERE is tested for fully two-way coupled
simulations with GCM’s. Nevertheless, although processes are modelled in a coupled
and physical fashion, these models often have to be applied at scales where the
Downloaded by Universidad Autonoma de Baja California At 14:12 20 September 2017 (PT)

governing equation for flow in the unsaturated zone (i.e. the Richards equation) does not
hold. The small scale heterogeneity of the unsaturated zone that is of importance for fast
infiltration of rain water through macropores, is not represented well in such cases.
Another deficit of these integrative hydrological models is that vegetation processes and
boundary layer flows are not represented very well. Models for land-atmosphere
interaction that were developed in the atmospheric sciences community tend to
represent vegetation processes and boundary layer flows in more detail and more
mechanistically. An example is CLM that models vegetation processes in high detail
(Oleson et al., 2008).
Integrative hydrological models were used in a few cases to assess the impact of
climate change on groundwater resources, but in most cases surface and subsurface
hydrology were not modelled in a coupled manner. Green et al. (2007) used an integrated,
physically based modelling approach, including the calculation of ET. Brouyère et al.
(2004) used a physically based method, but ET was estimated with a conceptual
approach. Cohen et al. (2006) used a simple methodology to calculate ET. Other authors
calculated ET on the basis of a conceptual model (Allen et al., 2004; Scibek and Allen,
2006a, b; Scibek et al., 2007; Jyrkama and Sykes, 2007; Woldeamlak et al., 2007). Loaiciga
et al. (2000) used a simple scaling methodology to calculate recharge rate. Hsu et al. (2007)
estimated recharge rate as a function of precipitation and potential ET, by applying
simple linear regression relations on the basis of historical data and historically
calibrated values. In general, it can be said that studies on the impact of climate change
on groundwater resources focus either on estimating future time series of recharge, or
subsurface processes, but never both meteorological and subsurface processes are
adequately modelled.
If an integrative hydrological model is used to assess the impact of climate change on
groundwater resources, the calibration of such a model with historical observations is
very important. In groundwater hydrology, the state-of-the-art is to condition models
inversely with Monte-Carlo type methods like sequential self-calibration
(Gómez-Hernández et al., 1997; Hendricks Franssen et al., 2003), the (regularized) pilot
points method (LaVenue et al., 1995; Alcolea et al., 2006) or the representer method
(Bennett, 1992; Valstar, 2001). An alternative is to search a single-best solution with
iterative techniques (Carrera and Neuman, 1986; Kitanidis, 1995), techniques that
include singular value decomposition (Tonkin et al., 2007) or the moment equations
method (Hernandez et al., 2003, 2006). In surface hydrology, new developments for the
calibration of many model parameters include Markov Chain Monte-Carlo methods
(Vrugt et al., 2003; Vrugt and Robinson, 2007) or Ensemble Kalman filtering (Vrugt et al.,
2005; Liu and Gupta, 2007). Nevertheless, little experience exists with the calibration of
 integrative hydrological models where both the unsaturated and saturated zones are Groundwater
highly discretized and all the above-mentioned hydrological processes are considered. resources
Therefore, there is still the need to improve the methods for the calibration of integrative
hydrological models.

5. Conclusions and outlook

The studies published until now on the impact of climate change on groundwater
249
resources are in general sensitivity studies, as no serious predictions were made that
considered the problem in its full complexity. This paper highlighted some serious
limitations of the studies published until now. It is important to downscale the future
Downloaded by Universidad Autonoma de Baja California At 14:12 20 September 2017 (PT)

precipitation from GCM’s with more rigorous methods. As meteorological data to

calculate potential ET are calculated in a GCM in a fully coupled manner, but on a very
coarse scale, also downscaling techniques are needed to downscale those variables.
Moreover, it is desirable that integrative hydrological models are used that include a
physically based ET calculation. Although integrative hydrological models exist that
are able to model the flow in the unsaturated and saturated zones, surface runoff and
interaction between surface water bodies and subsurface water in a fully coupled and
physical manner, often these models have to be applied (in practice) on too coarse scales.
Another limitation of integrative hydrological models is that some of the relevant
processes, like vegetation functioning and boundary layer flows, are described in a very
simplified manner. Integrative hydrological models are commonly available, but it is far
from trivial to calibrate such an integrative hydrological model with historical data.
Improved methods are needed to calibrate integrative hydrological models.
At the same time, it is desirable to develop a simplified methodology for assessing the
impact of climate change on groundwater resources. This would also allow estimating
for many small aquifers the response to climate change. However, first more
experience should be gained with complex, fully coupled models before knowing which
simplifications can be made. Probably, it is more justifiable to simplify the
representation of subsurface groundwater flow than the procedures to obtain the
future climate forcing.
Improved estimates of the impact of climate change on groundwater resources allow
adapting the infrastructure to optimise water resources management for the future, so
that problems with scarcity of drinking water can be reduced.

References
Alcolea, A., Carrera, J. and Medina, A. (2006), “Pilot points method incorporating prior
information for solving the groundwater flow inverse problem”, Advances in Water
Resources, Vol. 29 No. 11, pp. 1678-89.
Allen, D.M., Mackie, D.C. and Wei, M. (2004), “Groundwater and climate change: a sensitivity
analysis for the grand forks aquifer, southern British Columbia, Canada”, Hydrogeology
Journal, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 270-90.
Arnell, N.W. (1998), “Climate change and water resources in Britain”, Climatic Change, Vol. 39
No. 1, pp. 83-110.
Arpe, K. and Roeckner, E. (1999), “Simulation of the hydrological cycle over Europe: model
validation and impacts of increasing greenhouse gases”, Advances in Water Resources,
Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 105-19.
 IJCCSM AWEL (2004), “Hydrographische Jahrbücher Grundwasser”, available at: www.grundwasser.zh.
ch/internet/bd/awel/gs/gw/de/messdaten/jahrbuch_grundwasser.html (accessed 19
1,3 December 2008).
Barr, A.G., Morgenstern, K., Black, T.A., McCaughey, J.H. and Nesic, Z. (2006), “Surface energy
balance closure by the eddy-covariance method above three boreal forest stands and
implications for the measurement of the CO2 flux”, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,
Vol. 140 Nos 1/4, pp. 322-37.
250
Bennett, A.F. (1992), Inverse Methods in Physical Oceanography, Cambridge University Press,
New York, NY.
Betts, A.K. (2004), “Understanding hydrometeorology using global models”, Bulletin of the
Downloaded by Universidad Autonoma de Baja California At 14:12 20 September 2017 (PT)

American Meteorological Society, Vol. 85 No. 11, pp. 1673-88.

Betts, A.K., Ball, J.H., Beljaars, A.C.M., Miller, M.J. and Viterbo, P. (1996), “The land
surface-atmosphere interaction: a review based on observational and global modeling
perspectives”, JGR-Atmospheres, Vol. 101, D3, pp. 7209-25.
Bouraoui, F., Vachaud, G., Li, L.Z.X., Le Treut, H. and Chen, T. (1999), “Evaluation of the impact
of climate changes on water storage and groundwater recharge at the watershed scale”,
Climate Dynamics, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 153-61.
Brouyère, S., Carabin, G. and Dassargues, A. (2004), “Climate change impacts on groundwater
resources: modeled deficits in a chalky aquifer, Geer Basin, Belgium”, Hydrogeology
Journal, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 123-34.
Brutsaert, W. (2005), Hydrology. An Introduction, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
Busuioc, A., von Storch, H. and Schnur, R. (1999), “Verification of GCM-generated regional
seasonal precipitation for current climate and statistical downscaling”, Journal of Climate,
Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 258-72.
Carrera, J. and Neuman, S.P. (1986), “Estimation of aquifer parameters under transient and
steady state conditions: 1. Maximum likelihood method incorporating prior information”,
Water Resources Research, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 199-210.
Ciais, P., Reichstein, M., Viovy, N., Granier, A., Ogee, J., Allard, V., Aubinet, M., Buchmann, N.,
Bernhofer, C., Carrara, A., Chevallier, F., de Noblet, N., Friend, A.D., Friedlingstein, P.,
Grunwald, T., Heinesch, B., Keronen, P., Knohl, A., Krinner, G., Loustau, D., Manca, G.,
Matteucci, G., Miglietta, F., Ourcival, J.M., Papale, D., Pilegaard, K., Rambal, S., Seufert, G.,
Soussana, J.F., Sanz, M.J., Schulze, E.D., Vesala, T. and Valentini, R. (2005), “Europe-wide
reduction in primary productivity caused by the heat and drought in 2003”, Nature,
Vol. 437 No. 7058, pp. 529-33.
Cohen, D., Person, M., Daannen, R., Locke, S., Dahlstrom, D., Zabielski, V., Winter, T.C.,
Rosenberry, D.O., Wright, H., Ito, E., Nieber, J.L. and Gutowski, W.J. (2006),
“Groundwater-supported evapotranspiration within glaciated watersheds under
conditions of climate change”, Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 320 Nos 3/4, pp. 484-500.
Déqué, M., Rowell, D.P., Lüthi, D., Giorgi, F., Christensen, J.H., Rockel, B., Jacob, D., Kjellström, E.,
de Castro, M. and van den Hurk, B. (2007), “An intercomparison of regional climate
simulations for Europe: assessing uncertainties in model projections”, Climatic Change,
Vol. 81, Supp. 1, pp. 53-70.
Doppler, T., Hendricks Franssen, H.J., Kaiser, H.P., Kuhlmann, U. and Stauffer, F. (2007), “Field
evidence of a dynamic leakage coefficient for modelling river-aquifer interactions”, Journal
of Hydrology, Vol. 347 Nos 1/2, pp. 177-87.
Eckhardt, K. and Ulbrich, U. (2003), “Potential impacts of climate change on groundwater
recharge and streamflow in a central European low mountain range”, Journal of
Hydrology, Vol. 284 Nos 1/4, pp. 244-52.
 Eltahir, E.A.B. (1998), “A soil moisture-rainfall feedback mechanism, 1. Theory and Groundwater
observations”, Water Resources Research, Vol. 34 No. 4, pp. 765-76.
Feddema, J.J. and Freire, S. (2001), “Soil degradation, global warming and climate impacts”,
resources
Climate Research, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 209-16.
Finnigan, J.J., Clement, R., Malhi, Y., Leuning, R. and Cleugh, H.A. (2003), “A re-evaluation of
long-term flux measurement techniques. Part 1: averaging and coordinate rotation”,
Boundary-Layer Meteorology, Vol. 107 No. 1, pp. 1-48. 251
Foken, T., Wimmer, F., Mauder, M., Thomas, C. and Liebethal, C. (2006), “Some aspects of the energy
balance closure problem”, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 6 No. 12, pp. 4395-402.
Frei, C. (2007), Die Klimazukunft der Schweiz-Eine probabilistische Projektion, Meteoswiss,
Downloaded by Universidad Autonoma de Baja California At 14:12 20 September 2017 (PT)

Zurich.
Frei, C., Schöll, R., Fukutome, S., Schmidli, J. and Vidale, P.L. (2006), “Future change of
precipitation extremes in Europe: intercomparison of scenarios from regional climate
models”, Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 111, D06105.
Göckede, M., Foken, T., Aubinet, M., Aurela, M., Banza, J., Bernhofer, C., Bonnefond, J.M.,
Brunet, Y., Carrara, A., Clement, R., Dellwik, E., Elber, J., Eugster, W., Fuhrer, J.,
Granier, A., Grünwald, T., Heinesch, B., Janssens, I.A., Knohl, A., Koeble, R., Laurila, T.,
Longdoz, B., Manca, G., Marek, M., Markkanen, T., Mateus, J., Matteucci, G., Mauder, M.,
Migliavacca, M., Minerbi, S., Moncrieff, J., Montagnani, L., Moors, E., Ourcival, J.-M.,
Papale, D., Pereira, J., Pilegaard, K., Pita, G., Rambal, S., Rebmann, C., Rodrigues, A.,
Rotenberg, E., Sanz, M.J., Sedlak, P., Seufert, G., Siebicke, L., Soussana, J.F., Valentini, R.,
Vesala, T., Verbeeck, H. and Yakir, D. (2008), “Quality control of CarboEurope flux data –
part 1: coupling footprint analysis with flux data quality assessment to evaluate sites in
forest ecosystems”, Biogeosciences, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 433-50.
Gómez-Hernández, J.J., Sahuquillo, A. and Capilla, J.E. (1997), “Stochastic simulation of
transmissivity fields conditional to both transmissivity and piezometric data. 1. Theory”,
Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 203 No. 1, pp. 162-74.
Green, T.R., Bates, B.C., Charles, S.P. and Fleming, P.M. (2007), “Physically based simulation of
potential effects of carbon dioxide-altered climates on groundwater recharge”, Vadose
Zone Journal, Vol. 6 No. 3, pp. 597-609.
Hagedorn, R., Doblas-Reyes, F.J. and Palmer, T.N. (2005), “The rationale behind the success of
multi-model ensembles in seasonal forecasting – I. Basic concept”, Tellus A, Vol. 57 No. 3,
pp. 219-33.
Hendricks Franssen, H.J., Gómez-Hernández, J.J. and Sahuquillo, A. (2003), “Coupled inverse
modelling of groundwater flow and mass transport and the worth of concentration data”,
Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 281 No. 4, pp. 281-95.
Hendricks Franssen, H.J., Stöckli, R., Lehner, I., Rotenberg, E. and Seneviratne, S.I. (2009),
“Energy balance closure problems in eddy covariance data: the role of atmospheric
stability and wind velocity”, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology (in press).
Hernandez, A.F., Neuman, S.P., Guadagnini, A. and Carrera, J. (2003), “Conditioning mean steady
state flow on hydraulic head and conductivity through geostatistical inversion”, Stochastic
Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, Vol. 17 No. 5, pp. 329-38.
Hernandez, A.F., Neuman, S.P., Guadagnini, A. and Carrera, J. (2006), “Inverse stochastic moment
analysis of steady state flow in randomly heterogeneous media”, Water Resources
Research, Vol. 42, W05425.
Hertig, E. and Jacobeit, J. (2007), “Assessments of mediterranean precipitation changes for the
21st century using statistical downscaling techniques”, International Journal of
Climatology, Vol. 28 No. 8, pp. 1025-45.
 IJCCSM Holman, I.P. (2006), “Climate change impacts on groundwater recharge-uncertainty,
shortcomings and the way forward?”, Hydrogeology Journal, Vol. 14 No. 5, pp. 637-47.
1,3
Hsu, K.C., Wang, C.H., Chen, K.-C., Chen, C.-T. and Ma, K.-W. (2007), “Climate-induced
hydrological impacts on the groundwater system of the Pingtung Plain, Taiwan”,
Hydrogeology Journal, Vol. 15 No. 5, pp. 903-13.
Hunt, R.J., Prudic, D.E., Walker, J.F. and Anderson, M.P. (2008), “Importance of unsaturated zone
252 flow for simulating recharge in a humid climate”, Ground Water, Vol. 46 No. 4, pp. 551-60.
Inagaki, A., Letzel, M.O., Raasch, S. and Kanda, M. (2006), “Impact of surface heterogeneity on
energy imbalance: a study using LES”, Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan,
Vol. 84 No. 1, pp. 187-98.
Downloaded by Universidad Autonoma de Baja California At 14:12 20 September 2017 (PT)

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007), “Climate change, 2007: the physical science
basis”, Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC,
released in Paris on 2 February.
Jyrkama, M.I. and Sykes, J.F. (2007), “The impact of climate change on spatially varying
groundwater recharge in the grand river watershed (Ontario)”, Journal of Hydrology,
Vol. 338 Nos 3/4, pp. 237-50.
Kalnay, E. (2003), Atmospheric Modeling, Data Assimilation and Predictability, Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge.
Kitanidis, P. (1995), “Quasi-linear geostatistical theory for inversing”, Water Resources Research,
Vol. 31 No. 10, pp. 2411-9.
Koster, R.D. and Suarez, M.J. (2001), “Soil moisture memory in climate models”, Journal of
Hydrometeorology, Vol. 2 No. 6, pp. 558-70.
Koster, R.D., Guo, Z., Dirmeyer, P.A., Bonan, G., Chan, E., Cox, P., Davies, H., Gordon, C.T., Kanae, S.,
Kowalczyk, E., Lawrence, D., Liu, P., Lu, C.-H., Malyshev, S., McAveney, B., Mitchell, K.,
Mocko, D., Oki, T., Oleson, K.W., Pitman, A., Sud, Y.C., Taylor, C.M., Verseghy, D., Vasic, R.,
Xue, Y. and Yamada, T. (2006), “GLACE: the global land-atmosphere coupling experiment.
Part 1. Overview”, Journal of Hydrometeorology, Vol. 7 No. 4, pp. 590-610.
LaVenue, A.M., RamaRao, B.S., de Marsily, G. and Marietta, M.G. (1995), “Pilot point
methodology for automated calibration of an ensemble of conditionally simulated
transmissivity fields. 1. Theory and computational experiments”, Water Resources
Research, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 475-94.
Liu, Y. and Gupta, H.V. (2007), “Uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: toward an integrated data
assimilation framework”, Water Resources Research, Vol. 43, W07401.
Loaiciga, H.A. (2003), “Climate change and ground water”, Annals of the Association of American
Geographers, Vol. 93 No. 1, pp. 30-41.
Loaiciga, H.A., Maidment, D.R. and Valdes, J.B. (2000), “Climate-change impacts in a regional
karst aquifer, Texas, USA”, Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 227 No. 1, pp. 173-94.
Moustadraf, J., Razack, M. and Sinan, M. (2008), “Evaluation of the impacts of climate changes on
the coastal Chaouia aquifer, Morocco, using numerical modelling”, Hydrogeology Journal,
Vol. 16 No. 7, pp. 1411-26.
Oleson, K.W., Niu, G.-Y., Yang, Z.-L., Lawrence, D.M., Thornton, P.E., Lawrence, P.J., Stöckli, R.,
Dickinson, R.E., Bonan, G.B., Levis, S., Dai, A. and Qian, T. (2008), “Improvements to the
community land model and their impact on the hydrological cycle”, Journal of Geophysical
Research, Vol. 113, G01021.
Overgaard, J. (2005), “Energy-base land-surface modelling – new opportunities in integrated
hydrological modelling”, PhD thesis, Denmark Technical University, Lingby.
 Overgaard, J., Rosbjerg, D. and Butts, M.B. (2006), “Land-surface modelling in hydrological Groundwater
perspective – a review”, Biogeosciences, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 229-41.
resources
Pfister, L., Kwadijk, J., Musy, A., Bronstert, A. and Hoffmann, L. (2004), “Climate change, land
use change and runoff prediction in the Rhine-Meuse basins”, River Research and
Applications, Vol. 20 No. 3, pp. 229-41.
Refsgaard, A., Seth, S.M., Bathurst, J.C., Erlich, M., Storm, B., Jørgensen, G.H. and Chandra, S.
(1992), “Application of the SHE to catchments in India – part 1: general results”, Journal of 253
Hydrology, Vol. 140 Nos 1/4, pp. 1-23.
Richardson, A.D. and Hollinger, D.Y. (2005), “Statistical modeling of ecosystem respiration using
eddy covariance data: maximum likelihood parameter estimation, and Monte Carlo
Downloaded by Universidad Autonoma de Baja California At 14:12 20 September 2017 (PT)

simulation of model and parameter uncertainty, applied to three simple models”,

Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Vol. 131 Nos 3/4, pp. 191-208.
Rosenberg, N.J., Epstein, D.J., Wang, D., Vail, L., Srinivasan, R. and Arnold, J.G. (1999), “Possible
impacts of global warming on the hydrology of the Ogallala aquifer region”, Climatic
Change, Vol. 42 No. 4, pp. 677-92.
Schär, C., Lüthi, D. and Beyerle, U. (1999), “The soil-precipitation feedback: a process study with
a regional climate model”, Journal of Climate, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 722-41.
Schär, C., Vidale, P.L., Lüthi, D., Frei, C., Häberli, C., Liniger, M.A. and Appenzeller, C. (2004),
“The role of increasing temperature variability in European summer heatwaves”, Nature,
Vol. 427 No. 6972, pp. 332-6.
Scibek, J. and Allen, D.M. (2006a), “Comparing modeled responses of two high-permeability,
unconfined aquifers to predicted climate change”, Global and Planetary Change, Vol. 50
Nos 1-2, pp. 50-62.
Scibek, J. and Allen, D.M. (2006b), “Modeled impacts of predicted climate change on recharge and
groundwater levels”, Water Resources Research, Vol. 42, W11405.
Scibek, J., Allen, D.M., Cannon, A.J. and Whitfield, P.H. (2007), “Groundwater-surface water
interaction under scenarios of climate change using a high-resolution transient
groundwater model”, Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 333 Nos 2/3, pp. 165-81.
Semenov, S., Kovalevskii, V. and Batrak, G. (2004), “The effect of climate change on groundwater
resources over the Russian territory”, Abstract No. EGU04-A-07678 of the EGU
Conference 2004.
Seneviratne, S.I. and Stöckli, R. (2008), “The role of land-atmosphere interactions for climate
variability in Europe (The Netherlands)”, in Brönnimann, S. (Ed.), Climate Variability and
Extremes During the Past 100 Years, Vol. 100, Springer, Wageningen, pp. 179-92.
Seneviratne, S.I., Lüthi, D., Litschi, M. and Schär, C. (2006a), “Land-atmosphere coupling and
climate change in Europe”, Nature, Vol. 443 No. 7108, pp. 205-9.
Seneviratne, S.I., Koster, R.D., Guo, Z., Dirmeyer, P.A., Kowalczyk, E., Lawrence, D., Liu, P.,
Lu, C.-H., Mocko, D., Oleson, K.W. and Verseghy, D. (2006b), “Soil moisture memory in
AGCM simulations: analysis of global land-atmosphere coupling experiment (GLACE)
data”, Journal of Hydrometeorology, Vol. 7 No. 5, pp. 1090-112.
Stöckli, R., Lawrence, D.M., Niu, G.-Y., Oleson, K.W., Thornton, P.E., Yang, Z.-L., Bonan, G.B.,
Denning, A.S. and Running, S.W. (2008), “Use of FLUXNET in the community land model
development”, Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 113, G01025.
Therrien, R. and Sudicky, E.A. (1996), “Three-dimensional analysis of variable-saturated flow
and solute transport in discretely-fractured porous media”, Journal Contaminant
Hydrolology, Vol. 23 Nos 1/2, pp. 1-44.
 IJCCSM Tonkin, M., Doherty, J. and Moore, C. (2007), “Efficient nonlinear predictive error variance for
highly parameterized models”, Water Resources Research, Vol. 43, W07429.
1,3 Vaccaro, J.J. (1992), “Sensitivity of groundwater recharge estimates to climate variability and change,
Columbia Plateau, Washington”, Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 97, D3, pp. 2821-33.
Valstar, J.R. (2001), “Inverse modeling of groundwater flow and transport”, PhD thesis, Delft
University of Technology, Delft.
254 Vörösmarty, C.J., Green, P., Salisbury, J. and Lammers, R.B. (2000), “Global water resources:
vulnerability from climate change and population growth”, Science, Vol. 289 No. 5477,
pp. 284-8.
Vrugt, J. and Robinson, B.A. (2007), “Improved evolutionary optimization from genetically
Downloaded by Universidad Autonoma de Baja California At 14:12 20 September 2017 (PT)

adaptive multimethod search methods”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

of the United States of America, Vol. 104 No. 3, pp. 708-11.
Vrugt, J., Gupta, H.V., Bouten, W. and Sorooshian, S. (2003), “A shuffled complex evolution
metropolis algorithm for optimization and uncertainty assessment of hydrologic model
parameters”, Water Resources Research, Vol. 39 No. 8, pp. 1201-16.
Vrugt, J., Dirks, C.G.H., Gupta, H.V., Bouten, W. and Verstraten, J.M. (2005), “Improved treatment
of uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: combining the strengths of global optimization and
data assimilation”, Water Resources Research, Vol. 41, W01017.
Wilson, K., Goldstein, A., Falge, E., Aubinet, M., Baldocchi, D., Berbigier, P., Bernhofer, C.,
Ceulemans, R., Dolman, H., Field, C., Grelle, A., Ibrom, A., Law, B.E., Kowalski, A.,
Meyers, T., Moncrieff, J., Monson, R., Oechel, W., Tenhunen, J., Valentini, R. and Verma, S.
(2002), “Energy balance closure at FLUXNET sites”, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,
Vol. 113 No. 1, pp. 223-43.
Woldeamlak, S.T., Batelaan, O. and de Smedt, F. (2007), “Effects of climate change on the
groundwater system in the Grote-Nete catchment”, Belgium, Hydrogeology Journal, Vol. 15
No. 5, pp. 891-901.

About the author

Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen received an MSc from the Agricultural University of
Wageningen, The Netherlands, with a specialization in soil science. Afterwards, he specialized
in water resources management at the Technical University of Valencia (Spain) and received a
PhD from the Technical University of Valencia in Groundwater Hydrology. Since 2001, he works
at the Department of Environmental Engineering of the ETH Zurich, since 2005 as Lecturer and
Senior Researcher in stochastic hydrology. In 2008, he obtained an additional MSc degree from
the ETH Zurich in atmospheric and climatic sciences. Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen can be
contacted at: [email protected]

To purchase reprints of this article please e-mail: [email protected]

Or visit our web site for further details: www.emeraldinsight.com/reprints
 This article has been cited by:

1. F. Iyalomhe, J. Rizzi, S. Pasini, S. Torresan, A. Critto, A. Marcomini. 2015. Regional Risk Assessment for
climate change impacts on coastal aquifers. Science of The Total Environment 537, 100-114. [CrossRef]
2. I. Touhami, E. Chirino, J.M. Andreu, J.R. Sánchez, H. Moutahir, J. Bellot. 2015. Assessment of climate
change impacts on soil water balance and aquifer recharge in a semiarid region in south east Spain. Journal
of Hydrology 527, 619-629. [CrossRef]
3. Purna Chandra Nayak, Robin Wardlaw, Ashok K. Kharya. 2015. Water balance approach to study the
effect of climate change on groundwater storage for Sirhind command area in India. International Journal
of River Basin Management 13:2, 243-261. [CrossRef]
4. Santiago Castaño, David Sanz, Juan José Gómez-Alday. 2013. Sensitivity of a Groundwater Flow Model to
Downloaded by Universidad Autonoma de Baja California At 14:12 20 September 2017 (PT)

Both Climatic Variations and Management Scenarios in a Semi-arid Region of SE Spain. Water Resources
Management 27:7, 2089-2101. [CrossRef]
5. Juan Ramón Raposo, Jorge Dafonte, Jorge Molinero. 2013. Assessing the impact of future climate change
on groundwater recharge in Galicia-Costa, Spain. Hydrogeology Journal 21:2, 459-479. [CrossRef]
6. Jaouher Kerrou, Philippe Renard, Fabien Cornaton, Pierre Perrochet. 2013. Stochastic forecasts of
seawater intrusion towards sustainable groundwater management: application to the Korba aquifer
(Tunisia). Hydrogeology Journal 21:2, 425-440. [CrossRef]
7. S. Pasini, S. Torresan, J. Rizzi, A. Zabeo, A. Critto, A. Marcomini. 2012. Climate change impact
assessment in Veneto and Friuli Plain groundwater. Part II: A spatially resolved regional risk assessment.
Science of The Total Environment 440, 219-235. [CrossRef]
8. Christoph Neukum, Rafig Azzam. 2012. Impact of climate change on groundwater recharge in a small
catchment in the Black Forest, Germany. Hydrogeology Journal 20:3, 547-560. [CrossRef]
9. C. P. KumarImpact of Climate Change on Groundwater Resources 196-221. [CrossRef]
10. C. P. KumarImpact of Climate Change on Groundwater Resources 1094-1120. [CrossRef]