Development of A Manually Operated Hydraulic Press and Pull Machine
Development of A Manually Operated Hydraulic Press and Pull Machine
net/publication/337898715
CITATIONS READS
2 1,014
3 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Gas Turbine Aerodynamics & performance optimization, CBA & sustainability View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Nwankwojike Bethrand Nduka on 11 December 2019.
Abstract— A hydraulic press and pull machine comprising of a frame, cylinder and piston, two threaded studs, hydraulic pump and hose,
pulling clamp and a workpiece support was designed, fabricated and evaluated. The machine is manually operated. The maximum shear
force, maximum bending moment and maximum displacement of the machine workpiece support were determined as 74.9491N, 16.6335N-
m and 4.367e3mm for a simulated load of 1000N. Maximum axial, bending and torsional stresses were also determined as 0.00359, 701998
and 0.00653N/m2 respectively. performance of the developed machine was determined using seven bearings of bore diameters 24, 30, 40,
50, 65, 80 and 100mm respectively, fitted into seven corresponding shafts with shaft deviation of ±0.001mm and dismantled afterwards
using three different methods: traditional hammering, the developed manual hydraulic press and pull machine and already existing
electrically powered hydraulic press. The results of the experiments showed that traditional hammering is the most time consuming method
of mounting and dismounting force fits, followed by the use of the developed press-pull machine while electrically powered hydraulic
presses are the fastest.The machine which was fabricated with local materials will reduce the time and stress associated with installation
and removal of bearings, and other forms of force fits in machine assemblies. Hence, leading to an overall improvement in the standard of
machines/equipment fabricated in Nigeria.
—————————— ——————————
P
ress fit or friction fit, is an interference fit fastening other types of presses (power screw and mechanical
between two parts which is achieved by friction presses) include; hydraulic press provides a more
after the parts are pushed together, rather than by positive response to changes in input pressure, the force
any other means of fastening. Typical examples of and pressure can accurately be controlled, and the entire
interference fits are the press fitting of shafts into magnitude of force is available during the entire
bearings or bearings into their housings and the working stroke of the ram travel (Butcher, 2004; Sullivan,
attachment of watertight connectors to cables. An 2000; Cockbain, 1998; Doring, 1998). Hydraulic presses
interference fit also results when pipe fittings are are preferred when very large a nominal force is
assembled and tightened. required, hence the best option for mounting and
dismounting force fits (Lange 1975). The hydraulic press
In many workshops (especially small and medium is therefore a valuable equipment in the workshop and
scaled workshops), repair and replacement of press laboratory especially for press fitting operations and for
fitted machine elements are done in a crude manner. the deformation of materials such as in metal forming
This process wastes time and consumes a lot of energy, processes and material testing for strength (Dagwa and
as well as cause harm to the environment. Also the Ighadode, 2005; Harding, 1996).
material to be replaced or the machine/plant on which
the repairs is being carried out on may get damaged in Unfortunately, all such presses are imported into Nigeria
the process. The ability of a technician to carry out his and as such, cannot be afforded by small and medium
job safely, with less time and energy application scaled workshops or artisans. Also, existing presses are
depends on the availability of the right working tools. To electrically powered, which may not be readily available
perform jobs such as Pushing, pulling, thrusting and in small workshops. It is therefore important to design
rotation, presses are required. and manufacture a manually operated low cost
hydraulic press, using locally sourced materials like mild
For instance, the installation of bearings into housings or steel bars, pipes and rods, rubbers hoses, etc.
shafts and the extraction of such from a housing or shaft
depend largely on the tools and methods used. If The development of the manually operated hydraulic
bearings are not properly installed or removed, the effect press and pull machine will bring relief to workshops
is felt on the entire assembled machine. Also improper (especially small and medium scaled) by reducing the
installation of bearing causes vibration in rotating parts time and stress associated with installation and removal
and affects the geometric precision and surface integrity of bearings, and other forms of force fits in machine
of the balls and rollers (Khurmi and Gupta, 2006). assemblies, thereby ensuring easier and cheaper
Presses can be divided into the following categories: maintenance and repair of machines and plants. Since all
Hydraulic Presses which operate on the principles of parts of the machine were built with locally sourced
hydrostatic pressure, Screw presses which use power materials, this project therefore reduces dependence on
screws to transmit power and Mechanical Presses imported goods and promotes indigenous technology.
which utilize kinematic linkage of element to transmit
power (Niebel et al, 2007; Degarmo et al, 1997; Sharma,
2005).
*Corresponding Author
FUOYEJET © 2017 73
engineering.fuoye.edu.ng/journal
FUOYE Journal of Engineering and Technology, Volume 2, Issue 1, September 2017 ISSN: 2579-0625 (Online), 2579-0617 (Paper)
FUOYEJET © 2017 74
engineering.fuoye.edu.ng/journal
FUOYE Journal of Engineering and Technology, Volume 2, Issue 1, September 2017 ISSN: 2579-0625 (Online), 2579-0617 (Paper)
Moment1(N.m)
Moment2(N.m)
parts: frame, cylinder and piston, two threaded studs,
Torque(N.m)
Beam Name
Shear1(N)
Shear2(N)
Axial(N)
Joints hydraulic pump and hose, pulling clamp and a
workpiece support. Figure 3 shows the isometric view of
the machine with the main components identified.
- - -
- 1.66
Workpiece support
Case(N/m^2)
Dir1(N/m^2)
Dir2(N/m^2)
Torsional
Bending
Bending
(N/m^2)
Joints
Worst
Name
Beam
1 0.0065 707101
support
158 1 67
2554 imposed on the pillars. The frame provides mounting
- points and maintains proper relative positions of the
0.00359 70199 0.005985 units and parts mounted on it over the period of service
2 0.0065 701998
314 8 99 under all specified working conditions. It also provides
786
general rigidity of the machine (Acherkan, 1993).
FUOYEJET © 2017 75
engineering.fuoye.edu.ng/journal
FUOYE Journal of Engineering and Technology, Volume 2, Issue 1, September 2017 ISSN: 2579-0625 (Online), 2579-0617 (Paper)
The force required to push and pull the piston is Table 5: determination of press fitting and dismounting
generated by a manually operated hydraulic pump. The time for different bearing-shaft assemblies
pump has an arm which when moved up and down, Time required to Time required to
diameter (mm)
Bearing bore
down. The hose helps over-come vibration and absorb
hydraulic impulse shock. Hence, it is installed in such a
hammering
hammering
Electrically
Electrically
Traditional
Traditional
press-pull
press-pull
Hydraulic
Hydraulic
hydraulic
hydraulic
powered
powered
machine
machine
way that there must be no twists. The workpiece support
press
press
is a hollow rectangular beam with dimension 920 mm x
80 mm x 60 mm, welded to the sides of the frame (below
the threaded studs) for holding the workpiece while
pushing or pulling operation is done on it. The support 24 337 30 11 8 25 9 -
is adjustable to accommodate varying dimensions of 30 427 35 15 8 25 9 -
workpieces by means of three (3) 17 mm diameter holes 40 517 37 15 10 28 9 -
50 607 40 18 10 29 10 -
drilled on both sides of the frame.
65 742 42 20 10 29 10 -
80 877 43 21 10 32 10 -
2.4 Performance Test Procedure 100 967 47 21 12 32 10 -
To test the performance of the developed machine, seven
bearings of bore diameters 24, 30, 40, 50, 65, 80 and 100 From table 5 above, press fitting force was determined
mm respectively were fitted into seven corresponding (using equation 4) for bearing bore diameters of 24, 30,
shafts with shaft deviation of ±0.001 mm and dismantled 40, 50, 65, 80 and 100mm as 337, 427, 517, 607, 742, 877
afterwards. The mounting and dismounting of the and 967N respectively. Hence, the force required to press
various bearing-shaft assemblies were done using three fit a shaft into a bearing increases as the diameters of the
different methods: traditional hammering, using the shaft and bearing bore increase i.e., bigger shaft and
developed manual hydraulic press and pull machine bearing assemblies require larger press fitting force than
and using already existing electrically powered smaller ones. Also, of the three methods investigated, it
hydraulic press in each case. The time taken to mount can be seen that traditional hammering is the most time
and dismount the various assemblies for the three consuming method of mounting and dismounting force
methods used was recorded. Also, the force required for fits, followed by the use of the developed press-pull
press fitting the assembly was determined using machine. Electrically powered hydraulic presses are seen
equation 5 (NSK, 2008). to be the most efficient (in terms of time conservation)
(5) for mounting force fits. Finally, with issues such as non-
availability of electricity in local workshops as well as
Where:
high cost of electrically powered hydraulic presses, the
= 0.7 to 0.9 developed manual hydraulic press and pull machine is
d = nominal bearing bore diameter thus the best option for local workshops and artisans.
Di = raceway diameter of inner ring
B = nominal inner ring width
∆d = effective interference
4 CONCLUSION
E = modulus of longitudinal elasticity = 208MPa A manually operated hydraulic press and pull machine
μ = friction coefficient of the fitted surface = 0.135 was produced using locally sourced materials. The
The nominal inner ring width (B) for the various bore strength of this machine was analyzed by simulating a
diameters were obtained from table 4. load of 1000N and the corresponding values of
maximum shear force, maximum bending moment and
Table 4: Nominal width for different bearing bore maximum displacement were determined as 74.9491N,
diameters (Khurmi and Gupta, 2006) 16.6335N-m and 4.367e3mm. Also, maximum axial stress,
Bearing bore diameter (mm) Nominal inner ring width (mm) bending stress and torsional stress where determined as
24 15 0.00359, 701998 and 0.00653N/m2 respectively. The
30 19 developed machine will bring relief to small and
40 23
50 27 medium scaled workshops and artisans by reducing the
65 33 time and stress associated with installation and removal
80 39 of bearings, and other forms of force fits in machine
100 43
assemblies.
FUOYEJET © 2017 76
engineering.fuoye.edu.ng/journal
FUOYE Journal of Engineering and Technology, Volume 2, Issue 1, September 2017 ISSN: 2579-0625 (Online), 2579-0617 (Paper)
FUOYEJET © 2017 77
engineering.fuoye.edu.ng/journal