0% found this document useful (0 votes)
39 views3 pages

Ex1 2020 Solutions

The document contains corrections to exercises on fixed income and credit risk. It shows that for Brownian motions Ws and Wt-Ws are independent if t>s. It also derives the distribution of WT-Wt as N(0,T-t) and the conditional distribution of WT given Wt=x as N(x, T-t). Finally, it verifies an expression relating multiple Itô integrals is correct.

Uploaded by

jeanboncru
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
39 views3 pages

Ex1 2020 Solutions

The document contains corrections to exercises on fixed income and credit risk. It shows that for Brownian motions Ws and Wt-Ws are independent if t>s. It also derives the distribution of WT-Wt as N(0,T-t) and the conditional distribution of WT given Wt=x as N(x, T-t). Finally, it verifies an expression relating multiple Itô integrals is correct.

Uploaded by

jeanboncru
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Exercise Session 1

Fixed Income and Credit Risk

Question 1: Show by using heuristic arguments that for all t > s, Ws andh Wt − Ws are independent. i To do so
PN
you may use heuristic arguments as in class. Conclude what the value of E i=1 W ti−1 (W ti − W ti−1 ) is.

Correction Question 1: Set s < t and define ∆ ≡ T /N . Then, for N sufficiently large, there exists k and l such
that
k∆ ≤ s < (k + 1)∆, and l∆ ≤ t < (l + 1)∆.

Since Ws is approximated by
r k
T X
Xi ,
N i=1

and Wt − Ws is approximated by
r l
T X
Xi ,
N
i=k+1

no Xi figures in both sums, thus the sums are uncorrelated. Indeed,


r 
k r l
T X T X
Cov (Ws , Wt − Ws ) ∼ Cov  Xi , Xj 
N i=1 N
j=k+1
k l
T X X
= Cov (Xi , Xj )
N i=1 j=k+1
= 0.

Since Brownian increments are Gaussian, we conclude for independence. It follows that

XN N
X
E[ Wti−1 (Wtt − Wti−1 )] = E[Wti−1 (Wtt − Wti−1 )] = 0.
i=1 i=1

Question 2. Let Wt be a Brownian motion. At time t the Brownian has reached the value x.
q P
k
• Obtain the distribution of WT − Wt . Hint: Use the approximation that Wt ∼ N
T
i=1 Xi for Xi taking the
values +/-1 with equal probability?
Correction: As above, set t < T and define ∆ ≡ T /N . Then, for N sufficiently large, there exists k and l
such that
k∆ ≤ t < (k + 1)∆, and l∆ ≤ T < (l + 1)∆.

Then, WT − Wt is approximated by
r l
T X
Xi ,
N
i=k+1

1
which is equal to r Pl 1
Pl
T (l − k) i=k+1 Xi
p l−k i=k+1 Xi − 0
· √ = ∆(l − k) · ,
N l−k √1
l−k

which is, by the CLT, distributed as N (0, T − t).

• What is the distribution of WT conditional on Wt = x? Denote the corresponding density of this distribution
p (WT , T ; Wt = x, t) and write it down explicitly.
Correction: Observe that
WT = Wt + (WT − Wt ),

where the first term is known and equals x, and WT − Wt is a normally distributed random variable with
zero mean and variance T − t. Then, the conditional density of WT is the density of a Normal distribution
with mean x and variance T − t:
2
1

WT −x
−1 √
p (WT , T ; Wt = x, t) = p e 2 T −t
.
2π(T − t)

• Show that this density follows a Partial Differential Equation of the type

∂2p ∂p
2
+k = 0,
∂x ∂t

where you are asked to determine k. Hint: You need to brutally compute the differentials.
Correction: With explicit differentiation, obtain:

∂p WT − x
=p ,
∂x T −t
2
∂2p

WT − x p
= p − ,
∂x2 T −t T −t
 2
∂p p WT − x p
=− + .
∂t 2 T −t 2(T − t)
Set k = 2 to obtain an identity
∂2p ∂p
+k = 0.
∂x2 ∂t

Question 3: Verify that the expression

N
X W12 W2
Wτi (Wti − Wti−1 ) = − 0
i=1
2 2
N N
1X 2 X 2
− Wti − Wti−1 + Wτi − Wti−1
2 i=1 i=1
N
X 
+ (Wti − Wτi ) Wτi − Wti−1 .
i=1

given in the lecture notes is correct.

2
Hint: develop the expression on the right hand side and simplify till you get the expression on the left side.

Correction Question 3: We develop several terms of the right hand side:

N N
1X 2 1X 2
− Wti − Wti−1 = − (W − 2Wti Wti−1 + Wt2i−1 ),
2 i=1 2 i=1 ti
N N
X 2 X
Wτi − Wti−1 = (Wτ2i − 2Wτi Wti−1 + Wt2i−1 ),
i=1 i=1
N
X N
X
(Wti Wτi − Wti Wti−1 − Wτ2i + Wτi Wti−1 ).

(Wti − Wτi ) Wτi − Wti−1 =
i=1 i=1

summation of these expressions yields

N N N N
X 1X 2 1X 2 X
W ti W τ i − Wti + Wti −1 − Wτi Wti−1
i=1
2 i=1 2 i=1 i=1
N
X  1 1
= Wτi Wti − Wti−1 − Wt2N + Wt20
i=1
2 2

Presently, remembering that t0 = 0 and that tN = T = 1 we conclude.

You might also like