Management Accounting

MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING
PART 1
CPA SECTION 2
STUDY TEXT
www.someakenya.com Contact: 0707 737 890 Page 1

MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING
GENERAL OBJECTIVE
This paper is intended to equip the candidate with knowledge, skills and attitudes that will enable him/her
to apply management accounting principles and concepts in business
LEARNING OUTCOMES
A candidate who passes this paper should be able to:
- Estimate the cost of goods and services

- Analyse product costs for manufacturing and non-manufacturing activities
- Prepare marginal and absorption cost statements
- Analyse an organisation's activities through budgetary control process
- Analyse variances for decision making
- Use computers in cost management
CONTENT
1. Nature and purpose of cost and management accounting
- The nature of cost accounting and costing terms

- The role of cost accounting in management
- The purposes of cost accounting information
- Scope of cost accounting
- Meaning of management accounting, scope, limitations, applications
- Relationship between cost, financial and management accounting
- Selection of an ideal cost accounting system
2. Cost classification
- Definition and purpose of cost classification

- Methods of cost classification: By nature/elements of manufacturing costs; Functional
classification; Behavioral classification; Controllability; Time; Financial accounting;
Identification with inventory; For decision making
3. Cost estimation
- Meaning of cost estimation

- Methods of estimating cost; non-mathematical methods like engineering method, accounts
analysis method and high-Iow method; mathematical methods like scatter graph method, OLS
regression method (simple linear regression only)
4. Cost accumulation
- Accounting for materials and inventory; material cost records, purchasing procedures, receipt and
issues of material, methods of valuing material issues, inventory control procedures; economic
order quantity (EOQ) and economic batch quantity(EBQ) models and back flush
- Accounting for labour: Methods of labour remuneration, labour control procedures, maintenance
of labour records

- Accounting for overheads: Types of overheads, manufacturing, distribution and administration,
service departmental cost allocation and apportionment, overheads analysis, overhead absorption
rates, over or under absorption
- Activity based costing
5. Cost bookkeeping
- The flow of costs in a business enterprise

- Cost bookkeeping- interlocking and integrated ledger systems
6. Costing methods
- Job order costing

- Batch costing
- Process costing (including work in progress; joint and by-products)
- Service costing
- Unit costing
7. Marginal and absorption costing.
- Distinction between marginal and absorption costing

- Valuation of products under marginal and absorption costing
- Preparation of marginal and absorption statements; cost of production and profit determination
- Applications of marginal costing: Break-even analysis and charts (single product)
- Simplified decision problems; accept or reject, special order, dropping a product, make or buy
- Operating statements
8. Budgeting and budgetary control
- Nature and purposes of budgets

- Preparation of budgets; master budgets, functional (department budgets, cash budgets), proforma
financial reports (income statements and balance sheets)
- Purpose of budgetary control; operation of a budgetary control system, organisation and
coordination of the budgeting function
- Distinction between budgeting and budgetary control in the private and public sectors
9. Standard costing
- Types of standards
- Principles of setting standards
- Standard cost card
- Behavioural aspects of standard costing
- Generation of standard cost information
- Materials, labour and overheads variances; price and efficiency variances
10. Cost management
- Value chain-research and development-design-production-marketing distribution and customer

care
- Just in time (JIT)

- Use of computers in costing; job costing, inventory management, labour costing, cost entre
analysis, coding, budgeting and decision making
11. Overview of Performance Measurement
- Purpose of performance measurements

- Financial performance measures: profitability, liquidity, activity and gearing
- Non-financial performance measures. The balanced score card perspective
12. Emerging issues and trends
CONTENT PAGE
Topic 1: Nature and purpose of cost and management accounting……………………..…….5

Topic 2: Cost classification…………………………………………………………………...25
Topic 3: Cost estimation…………………………………………………………………...…34
Topic 4: Cost accumulation………………………………………………………………..…50
Topic 5: Cost bookkeeping……………………………………………………………….…135
Topic 6: Costing methods.......................................................................................................149
Topic 7: Marginal and absorption costing..............................................................................195
Topic 8: Budgeting and budgetary control.............................................................................236
Topic 9: Standard costing.......................................................................................................263
Topic 10: Cost management...................................................................................................297
Topic 11: Overview of Performance Measurement...............................................................306
Revised on: June 2016

TOPIC 1
NATURE AND PURPOSE OF COST AND ACCOUNTING
THE NATURE OF COST ACCOUNTING AND MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING
Cost accounting is a type of accounting process that aims to capture a company's costs of
production by assessing the input costs of each step of production as well as fixed costs such as
depreciation of capital equipment. Cost accounting will first measure and record these costs
individually, then compare input results to output or actual results to aid company management
in measuring financial performance.
The nature of cost accounting can be brought out under the following headings:
1. Cost accounting is a branch of knowledge: Though considered as a branch of

financial accounting, cost accounting is one of the important branch of knowledge, i.e., a
discipline by itself. It is an organised body of knowledge consisting of its own principles,
concepts and conventions. These principles and rules vary from industry to industry.
2. Cost accounting is a science: Cost accounting is a science as it is a body of systematic

knowledge relating to not only cost accounting but relating to a wide variety of subjects
such as law, office practice and procedure, data processing, production and material
control, etc. It is necessary for a cost accountant to have intimate knowledge of all these
field of study in order to carry on his day-to-day activities. But it is to be admitted that it
is not a perfect science as in the case of natural science.
3. Cost accounting is an art: Cost accounting is an art in the sense it requires the ability
and skill on the part of cost accountant in applying the principles, methods and
techniques of cost accountancy to various management problems. These problems
include the ascertainment of cost, control of costs, ascertainment of profitability, etc.
4. Cost accounting is a profession: In recent years cost accounting has become one of the
important professions which has become more challenging.
While cost accounting is often used within a company to aid in decision making, financial
accounting is what the outside investor community typically sees. Financial accounting is a
different representation of costs and financial performance that includes a company's assets and
liabilities. Cost accounting can be most beneficial as a tool for management in budgeting and in
setting up cost control programs, which can improve net margins for the company in the future.
One key difference between cost accounting and financial accounting is that while in financial
accounting the cost is classified depending on the type of transaction, cost accounting classifies

costs according to information needs of the management. Cost accounting, because it is used as
an internal tool by management, does not have to meet any specific standard and as result varies
in use from company to company or from department to department.
Development of Cost Accounting
Scholars have argued that cost accounting was first developed during the industrial
revolution when the emerging economics of industrial supply and demand forced manufacturers
to start tracking whether to decrease the price of their overstocked goods or decrease production.
During the early 19th century when David Ricardo and T. R. Malthus were developing the field
of economic theory, writers like Charles Babbage were writing the first books designed to guide
businesses on how to manage their internal cost accounting.
By the beginning of the 20th century, cost accounting had become a widely covered topic in the
literature of business management.
Types of Cost Accounting
Standard Cost Accounting
This type of of cost accounting uses ratios to compare efficient uses of labor and materials to
produce goods or services under standard conditions. Assessing these differences is called a
variance analysis. Traditional cost accounting essentially allocates cost based on one measure,
labor or machine hours. Due to the fact that overhead cost has risen proportionate to labor
cost since the genesis of standard cost accounting, allocating overhead cost as an overall cost has
ended up producing occasionally misleading insights.
Some of the issues associated with cost accounting is that this type of accounting emphasizes
labor efficiency despite the fact that it makes up a comparatively small amount of the costs for
modern companies.
Activity Based Costing
Activity based accounting is defined as, "an approach to the costing and monitoring of activities
which involves tracing resource consumption and costing final outputs, resources assigned to
activities, and activities to cost objects based on consumption estimates. The latter utilize cost
drivers to attach activity costs to outputs."
Activity based costing accumulates the overheads from each department and assigns them to
specific cost objects like services, customers, or products. The way these costs are assigned to
cost objects are first decided in an activity analysis, where appropriate output measures are cost
drivers. As result, activity based costing tends to be much more accurate and helpful when it
comes to helping managers understand the cost and profitability of their company's specific
services or products. Accountants using activity based costing will pass out a survey to

employees who will then account for the amount of time they spend on different tasks. This
gives management a better idea of where their time and money is being spent.
Lean Accounting
Lean accounting is an extension of the philosophy of lean manufacturing and

production developed by Japanese companies in the 1980s. Most accounting practices for
manufacturing work off the assumption that whatever is being produced is done in a large scale.
Instead of using standard costing, activity based costing, cost-plus pricing, or other management
accounting systems, when using lean accounting those methods are replaced by value-based
pricing and lean-focused performance measurements, for example, using a box score to facilitate
decision making and create simplified and digestible financial reports.
Marginal Costing
Considered a simplified model of cost accounting, marginal costing (sometimes called cost-
volume-profit analysis) is an analysis of the relationship between a product or service's sales
price, the volume of sales, the amount produced, expenses, costs and profits. That specific
relationship is called the contribution margin. The contribution margin is calculated by dividing
revenue minus variable cost by revenue. This type of analysis can be used by management to
gain insight on potential profits as impacted by changing costs, what types of sales prices to
establish, and types of marketing campaigns.
Types of Costs
Fixed Costs are costs that don't vary depending ont he amount of work a company is doing.
These are usually things like the payment on a building, or a piece of equipment that is
depreciating at a fixed monthly rate.
Variable costs are tied to a company's level of production. An example could be a coffee roaster,
who after receiving a large order of beans from a far-away locale, has to pay a higher rate for
both shipping, packaging, and processing.
Operating costs are costs associated with the day-to-day operations of a business. These costs
can be either fixed or variable depending.
Direct costs is the cost related to producing a product. If a coffee roaster spends 5 hours roasting
coffee, the direct costs of the finished product include the labor hours of the roaster, and the cost
of the coffee green. The energy cost to heat the roaster would be indirect because they're inexact,
hard to trace.

THE ROLE OF COST ACCOUNTING IN MANAGEMENT
Cost accounting is utilized for a number of purposes, some of which are briefly described in the
following points:
a) Accounting for costs

This may be seen as a record keeping or score-keeping role. Information must be
gathered and analyzed in a manner which will help in planning, controlling and decision
making
b) Planning and budgeting

This involves the quantification of plans for future operations of the enterprise; such
plans may be for the long or short term, for the enterprise as a whole or for the individual
aspects of the enterprise.
c) Control of operations of the enterprise

Control may be assisted by the comparison of actual cost information with that included
in the plan. Any differences between planned and actual events can be investigated and
corrective action implemented as appropriate
d) Decision making
Cost accounting information assists in the making of decisions about future operations of
the enterprise; such decisions making may be assisted by the information from cost
techniques and cost-volume-profit analysis.
e) Resource allocation decisions

For example product pricing in determining whether to accept or reject jobs. This is
based on cost and revenue implications of the relevant decisions
f) Performance evaluation
Cost accounting information is used to measure and evaluate actual performance so as to
make a decision of the degree of optimality or efficiency of resource utilization.
THE PURPOSES OF COST ACCOUNTING INFORMATION
Functions and objectives of cost and management accounting include the following:
1. Planning
2. Decision Making
3. Monitoring & Control
4. Accountability

1. Planning
Planning is an important function of management accounting which is most effectively

performed by the preparation of budgets and forecasts.
Forecasting is the process of estimation of the expected financial performance and position of a
business in the future. Common types of forecasts include cash flow forecast, projected profit
and loss and balance sheet forecast. Forecasts assist in determining the likely change in the
financial performance and position of a business when considered in the context of the various
assumptions used in forming the projections. Forecasting is the starting point in determining the
resource requirements of a business which are quantified into budgets.
Budgets quantify the financial targets to be achieved by the management of an organization.

Budgeting process often begins with the preparation of a master budget which is then used as a
basis for the preparation of departmental and operational budgets. Budgeting helps in the
effective allocation of resources of an organization between competing needs (e.g. departments,
products, etc) in order to achieve the financial goals of a business. Budgets and forecasts help
businesses to deal with potential problems proactively and avoid foreseeable bottlenecks in
business resources.
2. Decision Making
Management accounting facilitates the provision of financial information to management for

decision making. Management accounting also involves the evaluation of alternative strategies
and actions by the application of techniques and concepts such as relevant costing, cost-volume-
profit analysis, limiting factor analysis, investment appraisal techniques and client / product
profitability analysis.
3. Monitoring & Control
Control process in management accounting system starts by defining standards against which
performance may be measured such as standard costs and budgets. Actual results are measured
and any variance between targets and results are analyzed and where necessary, corrective
actions are taken. Management accounting plays a vital role in the monitoring and control of cost
and efficiency of the routine processes and as well as one-off jobs and projects undertaken by an
organization.
4. Accountability
Management accounting lays great emphasis on accountability through effective performance

measurement. By setting targets for strategic business units and as well as for departments,
management accounting assists in the assignment of responsibility for the achievement of
business targets by individual managers. Responsibility accounting is achieved by appraising the
performance of managers responsible for their business units while giving due consideration for
factors not within their control or influence.

COST ACCOUNTING DEPARTMENT AND ITS RELATION WITH OTHER
DEPARTMENTS
Cost accounting department records, classifies and present cost information for manufacturing
and other activities of the organisation. It makes an analysis of cost of manufacturing, marketing
and administration and provides control reports and other decision making data to all levels of
management for the purpose of controlling and reducing costs.
It is, therefore, necessary that cost accounting department should have a proper coordination with
other departments of the organisation. All departments should help each other so that the
objective of minimum possible cost may be achieved without too many bottle-necks.
1. Cost Accounting Department and Production Department:
Cost accounting department and production department are closely related to each other.
Production department is concerned with the conversion of raw materials into finished
products. Cost accounting department helps in estimating the various costs involved in
the manufacturing process like material cost, labour cost and other expenses involved for
manufacturing a product.
As per cost estimates, production department makes timely arrangement of material,

labour and other services required for the manufacturing process so that production may
go on smoothly without any interruption. Cost accounting department is concerned with
ascertaining, controlling and reducing cost of the manufacturing process.
The required information regarding costs relating to the manufacturing process both
budgeted and actual is collected by cost accounting department from the production
department and sent to the management for exercising cost control.
In a competitive world for facing competition effectively, reducing cost of production is a

very important function. Both production department and cost accounting department can
help each other in reducing cost of production which is the crying need of the competitive
economy.
2. Cost Accounting Department and Purchases Department:
Purchase department is to ensure that right type of material is purchased at a reasonably

low price at a right time from a right supplier and there is no excessive investment in
materials. Continuous availability of material is to be ensured so that production may not
be held up for want of materials.
In these respects cost accounting department can help purchase department by setting
various levels of materials like minimum level, maximum level, reordering level,
economic order quantity etc. Various types of material control suggested by the cost
accounting department will be helpful in ensuring minimum possible cost of materials.

3. Cost Accounting Department and Personnel Department:
Personnel Department concerned with proper recruitment, selection, training labour

turnover, time keeping, time booking, fixing of wage rate, preparation of payroll, idle
time and over time works with close co-ordination of cost accounting department to get
effective results of the personnel policies. Cost accounting department suggest ways and
means for reducing costs relating to employees working in the organisation.
Cost accountant can recommend incentive plans for remunerating employees, which will
be attractive to the employees for earning more wages and salaries and at the same time
reducing labour cost per unit. In this way both departments personnel and cost accounting
can be helpful in developing a contented labour force which will be willing to work for
the organisation.
4. Cost Accounting Department and Finance & Accounts Department:
A close coordination is required between cost accounting department and finance and
accounts department for reducing and controlling costs. Finance department is dependent
upon the cost accounting department for making an estimate of funds required for
production and marketing purposes. Similarly, materials and other supplies cannot be
purchased at the minimum possible prices if the finance department does not provide the
required finance at the time it is required.
Cost accounting department helps financial accounting department in preparing budgets.

It also helps financial accounting department to make the payment of the bills by duly
approving them. Past figures are provided to the cost accountant by financial accounting
for making estimates for the future. Cost accounting department and financial accounting
department depend on each other for reconciling profit as per cost accounts and profit as
per financial accounts.
5. Cost Accounting Department and Marketing Department:
Marketing department is mainly concerned with marketing of products at competitive

prices. Marketing department gets cost information from cost accounting department for
fixing reasonable selling prices which may be acceptable to consumers. For considering
alternative methods of mar ting, information of various types of costs involved in various
methods is provided by the cost accountant to the marketing manager.
Similarly, on the basis of information provided by the marketing department, cost

accounting department will suggest the cheapest and effective method of marketing a
particular product.

SCOPE OF COST ACCOUNTING
Scope refers to the various areas of study included in that subject. As regards the scope of cost
accountancy is concerned, it has vast scope. The following topics fall under the preview of cost
accountancy:
1) Costing
2) Cost Accounting
3) Cost Control Techniques
4) Budgeting and
5) Cost Audit
1. Cost ascertainment
Costing is the technique and process of ascertaining the cost. Costing is the process of
determining the costs of products, services or activities.
The above definition is very significant in as much as it carries the main theme of cost
accountancy. This definition emphasizes two important aspects, viz
(a) The technique and process of costing: The technique of costing involves two distinct
steps, namely,
(i) collection and classification of costs according to various elements and
(ii) allocation and apportionment of the expenses which cannot be directly charged to
production. As a process, costing is concerned with the routine ascertainment of cost
with a formal procedure.
(b) Ascertainment of cost: It involves three steps;-
(i) Collection and analysis of expenses,
(ii) Measurement of production at different stages and
(iii) Linking up of production with the expenses.
To achieve the first step, costing has developed different systems such as Historical, Estimated
and Standard Cost. For achieving the second step, costing has developed different methods such
as single or output costing. Job costing, contract costing, etc.Finally, for achieving the last step
costing has developed important techniques such as Absorption Costing, Marginal Costing and
Standard Costing.
The three terms indicated as ‘systems’, ‘methods’, ‘techniques’ are independent factors but co-
exist together. Ascertainment of cost of production is based on all these terms. For example,
continuous type of industries may use process costing as a method, using actual cost as a system,
under Standard Costing Technique.
2. Cost Accounting
Cost Accounting is the branch of accounting dealing with the classification, recording,
allocation, summarization and reporting of current and prospective costs.

The above definition reveals the following aspects of cost accounting:
a) Cost classification: This refers to grouping of like items of cost into a common group.
b) Cost recording: This refers to posting of cost transactions into the various ledger
maintained under cost accounting system.
c) Cost allocation: This refers to allotment of costs to various products or department.
d) Cost determination or cost finding: This refers to the determination of the cost of goods
or services by informal procedure, i.e. Procedures that do not carry on the regular process
of cost accounting on a continuous basis.
e) Cost reporting: This refers to furnishing of cost data on a regular basis so as to meet the
requirements of management
3. Cost Control
Cost control represents the employment of management devices in the performance of any
necessary operation so that pre-established objectives of quality, quantity and time may be
attained at the lowest possible outlay for goods and services. The terminology published by
ICMA, London, defines cost control as “The guidance and regulation by executive action of the
cost of operating an undertaking.” According to this definition, cost control aims at guiding the
actuals towards the lines of target and regulates the actuals if they deviate from the targets. This
guidance and regulation is done by the executive who is responsible for causing the deviation.
This process will become clear by enumerating the steps involved in any cost control technique.
a) Fixation of targets in terms of cost and production performance.

b) Ascertaining the actual cost and production performance.
c) Comparison of actuals with the targets.
d) Analysing the variance by causes and the person responsible for it.
e) Taking remedial steps to set right unfavourable variations.
Cost control is exercised through a variety of techniques such as inventory control, quality
control, budgetary control, standard costing, etc. The advantages of cost control are as follows:
a) It helps in utilizing the resources to the full extent.
b) It helps in reduction of prices which are benefited by customers.
c) It helps in competing successfully in the market.
d) It increases the profit earning capacity of the business.
e) It increases the goodwill of the business.
4. Budgetary control
It is the establishment of budgets relating to the responsibilities of executives to the requirements
of a policy and the continuous comparison of actual with budgeted results either to secure by
individual action the objectives of that policy or to provide a basis for its revision. In short, it
involves the fixation of budgets or estimated cost and comparison of actual cost with the budget
fixed.

5. Cost Audit
Cost Audit is the verification of the correctness of cost accounts and a check on the adherence to
the cost accounting plan. Its purpose is not only to ensure that cost accounts and other records are
arithmetically correct but also to see that the principles and rules have been applied correctly.
MEANING OF MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING, SCOPE, LIMITATIONS,

APPLICATIONS
Management Accounting is the process of identification, measurement accumulation, analysis,

preparation, interpretation and communication of financial information used by management to
plan, evaluate and control within an organization and to ensure appropriate use of and
accountability for its resources.
The scope or field of management accounting is very wide and broad based and it includes a
variety of aspects of business operations. The main aim of management accounting is to help
management in its functions of planning, directing, controlling and areas of specialization
included within the any organization. The scope of management accounting can be studied as
follows:
1. Financial accounting
Financial accounting forms the basis for analysis and interpretation for furnishing meaningful
data to the management. The control aspect is based on financial data and performance
evaluation, on recorded facts and figures. So, management accounting is closely related to
financial accounting in many respects.
2. Cost accounting
Cost accounting is the process and techniques of ascertaining cost. Planning, decision making
and control are the basic managerial functions. The cost accounting system provides the
necessary tool for carrying out such functions efficiently. The tools includes standard costing,
inventory management, variable costing etc.
3. Budgeting andforecasting
Budgeting means expressing the plans, policies and goals of the firm for a definite period in
future. Forecasting on the other hand, is a prediction of what will happen as a result of a given
set of circumstances. Forecasting is a judgment whereas the budgeting is an organizational
object. These are useful for management accounting in planning.
4. Inventory control
Inventory is necessary to control from the time it is acquire till its final disposal as it involves
large sum. For controlling inventory, management should determine different level of stock. The
inventory control technique will be helpful for taking managerial decisions.

5. Statistical method
Statistical tools not only make the information more impressive, comprehensive and intelligible
but also are highly useful for planning and forecasting.
6. Interpretation ofdata
Analysis and interpretation of financial statements are important part of management accounting.
After analyzing the financial statements, the interpretation is made and the reports drawn from
this analysis are presented to the management. Interpreting the accounting data to the authorities
in the management is the principal task of management accounting.
7. Reporting to management
The interpreted information must be communicated to those who are interested in it. The report
may cover Profit and Loss Account, Cash Flow and Funds Flow statements etc.
8. Internal audit and tax accounting

Management accounting studies all the tax matters to assist the management in investment
decisions vis-a-vis tax planning as a resource to enjoy tax relief.
Internal audit system is necessary to judge the performance of every department. Management is
able to know deviations in performance through internal audit. It also helps management in
fixing responsibility of different individuals.
9. Methods of procedures
This includes maintenance of proper data processing and other office management services. It
may have to deal with filing, copying, duplicating, communicating and management information
system and also may have to report about the utility of different office machines
Uses of management accounting

Management accounts will enable to:
 compare your accounts with original budgets or forecasts
 manage your resources better
 identify trends in your business
 highlight variations in your income or spending which may require attention
They should be used for the following:
Record keeping
 recording business transactions
 measuring results of financial changes
 projecting financial effects of future transactions
 preparing internal reports in a user-friendly format

Planning and control
 collecting cash
 controlling stocks
 controlling expenses
 co-ordination and monitoring of strategy/performance
 monitoring gross margins
Decision making
 using cost information for pricing, capital investment and marketing
 evaluating market and product profitability
 evaluating the financial effect of strategies and plans
Limitations of Management Accounting

Though management accounting is helpful tool to the management as it provides information for
planning, controlling and decision making, still its effectiveness is limited by a number of
reasons. Some of the limitations of management accounting are as follows:
1. Based on accounting information

Management accounting is based on data and information provided by financial accounting and
cost accounting. As such the correctness and effectiveness of managerial decisions will depend
upon the quality of data provided by cost and financial accounts. So, effectiveness of
management account is limited to the reliability of sources of information.
2. Lack of knowledge
The use of management accounting requires the knowledge of number of related subjects.
Deficiency in knowledge in related subjects like accounting principles, statistics, economics,
principle of management etc. will limit the use of management accounting.
3. Management accounting is only a tool

The tools and techniques of management accounting provide only information and not decisions.
Decisions are to be taken by the management and implementation of decisions is also done by
management.
4. Evolutionary stage
Management accounting is still in a development stage and has not yet reached a final stage. The
techniques and tools used by this system give varying and differing results. It is still named as
internal accounting and/ or operational accounting.

5. Personal prejudices and bias
The interpretation of financial information may differ from person to person depending upon the
capability of the interpreter. Analysis and interpretation of data and information may be
influenced by personal basis. As such, the objectivity of decision may be affected by personal
prejudices and bias.
6. Psychological resistance
Changes in traditional accounting practices and organizational set up are required to install the
management accounting system. It calls for a rearrangement of the personnel and their activities
and framing of new rules and regulations which generally may not be liked by the people
involved.
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING AND COST ACCOUNTING
Cost accounting is very closely-related to financial accounting. Some authorities on the subject
consider cost accounting to be the branch of financial accounting. But it may be said that cost
accounts is complementary to financial accounts, i.e., a subject which is necessary to make
financial accounts whole or complete. Financial accounts and cost accounts are both similar in
certain respects. But in some other respects they differ from one another. These points of
similarities and dissimilarities are enumerated below:
Points of Similarities
a) The fundamental principles of double entry are applicable in both the systems of accounts.
b) The invoices and vouchers constitute the common basis for recording transactions under both
the systems of accounts.
c) The results of business are revealed by both the systems of accounts.
d) The causes for losses and wastages of a business are provided by both these systems of
accounts.
e) The determination of future business policy is guided by both these systems of accounts.
f) A basis for comparison of expenses is being provided by both the accounting systems.
g) Accuracy of accounts is maintained under both the systems by means of exercising check
over errors and commissions which might creep in either of accounts.

Points of Dissimilarities
Points of differences Financial Accounts Cost Accounts
1. Purpose The purpose of financial accounts The purpose of cost accounting is internal
is external reporting mainly to i.e., to the management of every business
owners, reporting, creditors, tax
authorities, government, and
prospective investors
Cost accounts are maintained voluntarily
This is to be maintained In some cases government has directed
2. Obligation compulsorily The preparation of some companies to maintain cost accounts
accounts must be in accordance to improve efficiency.
with the statutory provisions.
.
(a) Financial accounts records (a) Cost accounts records transactions
3. Recording transactions in a subjective in a subjective manner. i.e.,
manner, i.e., according an according to purpose for which
objective manner to the costs are incurred
nature of expenditure
(b) In cost accounts costs are
(b) In financial accounts expressed by proper analysis and
expenses are recorded in classification in order to find out
totals cost per unit
(c) Cost accounts records only those

(c) Financial accounts records costs which affect production and
all transactions which takes sales
place in the business.
(d) Cost accounts records both
(d) Financial accounts records historical and estimated costs
only
historical costs
Cost accounts show the profitability or

Financial accounts disclose profit otherwise of each product, process or
4. Analysis of for the entire business as a whole operation so as to reveal the areas of
Profit profitability
(a) It does not make use of any (a) It makes use of some important
control techniques. control techniques such a
5. Control (b) techniques such a Marginal Marginal Costing
Costing any technique (b) It exercises control over materials
using some techniques such as
(c) Control over labour is not ABC analysis level setting,
exercised economic order quantity etc.
(c) Control over labour is exercised
and efforts are taken to minimise
idle time, over time etc.

Generally, financial accounts Cost accounting furnishes cost data at
provides financial information frequent intervals. Some reports are daily.
once a year Some are weekly and some monthly
6. Duration of
reporting The cost data helps in evaluating the
The information provided by efficiency of the businesses
financial accounts is not
sufficient to evaluate the
7. Evaluation of efficiency of the business
efficiency It provides adequate data for formulating
It fails to guide the formulation pricing policy pricing policy.
of pricing policy
Stock is always valued of cost price
8. Pricing Stock is valued at cost or market
price of stock whichever is less
9. Valuation
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN COST AND MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING
Management accounting is defined as “the application of appropriate techniques and concepts in

processing the historical and projected economic data of an entity to assist management in
establishing a plan for reasonable economic objectives and in the making of rational decisions
with a view towards achieving these objectives.” It includes the methods and concepts necessary
for effective planning for choosing among alternative business actions, and for control through
the evaluation and interpretation of performance. Its study involves consideration of ways in
which accounting information may be accumulated, synthesized, analyzed and presented in
relation to specific problems, decisions and day-to-day tasks of business management.
Management accounting can also be defined as the application of professional knowledge and
skill in the preparation and presentation of accounting information in such a way as to assist
management in the formulation of policies and in the planning and control of the operation of the
undertaking.”
If we examine the above two definitions of management accounting it appears that both the
systems of accounts serve the same purpose.
However, they differ from one another in respect of the following

Points of Cost Accounting Management Accounting
differences
1.Growth of The history of cost accounting This system of accounting evolved in the
dates back Accounting to middle of 20th century. Hence it is of
fourteenth century recent origin where compared to cost
accounting
2. Object The main objects of cost
accounts is to ascertain and The main objective of management
control cost accounting is to provide useful
information to management for decision-
3. Basis of making.
It is based on both present and
future recording transactions It is concerned purely with the
for cost ascertainment transactions relating to future.
4. Scope
Cost accounting has narrow
scope as it covers matters It has a wide scope in as much as it covers
relating to ascertainment and the areas of financial accounts, cost
5. Utility control of cost. accounts, taxation, etc.
Cost accounts serves the needs

of both internal management Management accounting serves the needs
6. Types of and external parties of only internal management
It deals only with monetary It deals with both monetary and non-
transactions i.e., it covers only transactions monetary transactions, i.e.,
quantitative aspect both quantitative dealt with and
7. qualitative aspects
Observation
Cost accounts follow a definite It does not follow a definite principle and
principle of principles for Instead, the data to be presented and
ascertaining cost and a format format for recording. depends up on the
need of the management

COST ACCOUNTS SYSTEM
At the outset it is to be understood that a common cost accounting system cannot be installed for
all types of business undertakings. The cost accounting system depends upon the nature of
business and the product manufactured. Before a suitable system of cost accounting is installed it
is necessary to undertake a preliminary investigation so as to know the feasibility of installing
cost accounting system to such business. While introducing a system of cost accounts it should
be borne in mind that cost accounting system must suit the business. There should not be any
attempt to make the business suit the system. One more consideration that is of practical
importance is that the benefits derived from cost accounting system must be more than the
investment made on it. This means the system must be simple and it must lead to savings through
the control of materials, labour and overheads when
Compared to expenses incurred in maintaining it. For the successful functioning of the costing
system, the following conditions are essential:
a) There must be an efficient system of material control.
b) A sound and well-designed method of wage payment must be set up.
c) The existence of sound basis for collection of all indirect expenses and a basis for its
apportionment to various production departments.
d) The integration of cost and financial accounts to facilitate reconciliation of profit as shown
by these two systems of accounts.
e) The use of printed forms so as to facilitate quick compilation of cost reports.
f) The duties and responsibilities of cost accountant must be made clear.
Factors to be considered before installing a cost accounting system
The following factors are to be considered before installing a cost accounting system:
1. History of business unit: The history of a business unit implies the duration of its existence,
position in the industry, the rate of growth, policy and philosophy of management and the
like. The history of business unit serves as the basis for designing the cost accounts in respect
of necessity, simplicity, and investment involved in installing cost accounts.
2. Nature of the industry: The nature of business such as manufacturing, mining, trading, etc.
determines the costing techniques to be applied. Similarly, the type of product manufactured
also determines the method of costing that is to be employed. In other words, there is no all-
purpose technique and method of costing that can be applied universally.
3. Product range: The range of products manufactured and sold also determines the method of
costing to be selected. Accordingly range of products must be analysed in terms of size,
models, fashions, area of market, competitors and whether the products are made to
customer’s specification or for stocking and selling.

4. Technical considerations: Technical considerations that influence the installation of cost
accounts are as follows:
a) Size and layout of the factory
b) The existence of production and service departments
c) Flow of production
d) Capacity of machines and degree of mechanization
e) Existence of laboratories
f) Internal transport and material handling equipments
g) Production control techniques
h) Inspection and testing of materials and finished goods.
5. Organizational factors: The problem of installing cost accounting is somewhat difficult in
case of an existing business when compared to new business. However, the existing set up of
the organisation should be least disturbed should the need arise. In order to fix up
responsibility to the executives it may be necessary to group the departments. The
organisational factors to be considered are :
1) Size and the type of organisation such as line, line and staff, functional and committee
organisation,
2) The levels of management, top level, middle level and bottom level management,
3) Extent of delegation and responsibility,
4) Extent of centralization and decentralization,
5) Extent of departmentation,
6) Availability of modern office equipments, and
7) Number of managerial and supervisory staff.
6. Selling and distribution method: The chief factors to be considered with regard to
distribution process are the warehousing facilities, external transport, market research and
other promotional measures, terms of sale and procurement of orders from customers.
7. Accounting aspects: The factors to be considered in respect of accounting are:
a) Number of financial records,
b) Existing forms,
c) Registers used, and
d) Number of copies required.
8. Area of control to be exercised: The area where cost control is to be exercised is to be
identified so that each manager may take action relevant to his activities. If material control
occupies significant area of control, it must be given topmost priority for exercising control
over materials.
9. Reporting: The cost accounting system to be installed must ensure frequency and
promptitude in reporting cost data to all levels of management. It must also to be pointed out
that duplication of reporting is to be avoided. Further, only those information which are
relevant for the management in a particular context alone should be reported.

10. Uniformity: The practice of adopting uniform costing facilitates inter-firm comparison
among various firms belonging to the same industry. Further it also has the benefit of
adopting common costing practice if a holding company has number of subsidiaries.
11. Use of electronic data processing: In modern days it has become a common practice to use
electronic data processing equipments and computers. In this situation it is essential to ensure
that the equipment meets the needs of the system but not the other way round.
12. Practical considerations: The cost accounting system to be installed must be flexible in
operation and must be capable of adaptation to changing conditions. The system must be
periodically scrutinized so as to make necessary changes owing to development in business.
Practical Difficulties in Installing Cost Accounting

In addition to the above problems, a cost accountant will encounter the following practical
difficulties at the time of installation of cost accounting system:
1. Lack of support from management: Wherever costing system is installed. It is essential to
seek the support of various departmental managers. Very often the managers show hostile
attitude towards the costing system. They feel that this system will interfere in their routine
work and probably as a means of checking their efficiency. Under such circumstances it is
better to convince them about the utility of costing system for the business as a whole.
2. Resistance by existing accounting staff: Very often the existing accounting staff resists the
installation of the cost accounting system on two grounds. Firstly, they feel that the new
system of accounting might lead to excess work. Secondly, they are afraid of their job
security. But this difficulty may be overcome by encouraging them about the usefulness of
cost accounting as a supplement to financial accounts and the generation of more
employment opportunities from the installation of cost accounting system.
3. Non-cooperation from middle and bottom level management: At times the middle and
bottom level managers such as foremen, supervisors and inspectors also fail to extend their
wholehearted cooperation fearing additional work which may be entrusted to them.
4. This problem may be overcome by suggesting them about the simplicity of the system and
the existence of a separate cost accounting department to look after costing matters.
However, they may be required to provide necessary reports concerning their area of activity
so as to enable functioning of cost accounting department efficiently.
5. Lack of trained staff: This was no doubt a problem in olden days. Today this problem is
overcome, thanks to the establishment of The Institute of Cost and Works Accountant of
India in our country which offers professional course in costing and also offers training
facilities through various companies to the candidates undergoing the course. In spite of this
facility, it is somewhat difficult to get the competent and experienced staff at the time of
installation. This problem can be overcome by paying attractive salaries to the cost
accountants.
6. Heavy expenses in installing and maintaining the system: The setting up of a separate
costing department with staff often poses a problem. In addition to installation, the operating

expenses in the form of printing and stationery, heating and lighting, depreciation and
insurance, rent and rates are to be incurred. However, as was mentioned earlier, the system
of cost accounting must be a useful investment, i.e., benefits derived from it must be more
than the investment made on it. If this is not possible, for the time being the system must be
discarded.
SELECTION OF AN IDEAL COST ACCOUNTING SYSTEM
The following are the essentials of an ideal cost accounting system:

1. Accuracy: The system of cost accounting must provide for accuracy in terms of both cost
ascertainment and presentation. Otherwise it will prove to be misleading.
2. Simplicity: Cost accounting system involves detailed analysis of cost. To avoid
complications in the procedure of cost ascertainment an elaborate system of costing should
be avoided and every care must be taken to keep it as simple as possible.
3. Elasticity: The cost accounting system should be capable of adopting itself to the changing
situations of business. It must be capable of expansion or contraction depending upon the
needs of the business.
4. Economy: The costs of operating costing system must be less. It must result in increased
benefit when compared to the expenditure incurred in installing it.
5. Comparability: The records to be maintained must facilitate comparison over a period of
time. The past records must serve as a basis to guide the future.
6. Promptness: An ideal costing system is one which provides cost data in an analytical form
to the management. So all the departments of a factory must analyse and record the relevant
items of cost promptly in order to furnish cost information on a regular basis to various levels
of management. This helps in checking up the progress of the business on a regular basis.
7. Periodical preparation of accounts: With a view to facilitate the comparison of results
frequently, it is desirable to prepare accounts periodically. Constant comparison of actual
result with standard result enables to spot out areas of inefficiency. This can be set right by
taking remedial measures.
8. Reconciliation with financial accounts: The system of cost accounts must be capable of
reconciling with financial accounts so as to check accuracy of both the system of accounts.
9. Uniformity: The various forms and documents used under costing system must be uniform
in size and quality of paper. Printed forms must be used to avoid delay in the preparation of
reports. This also reduces the burden of clerical staff. Forms of different colours can be used
to distinguish different documents.
10. Equity: The basis of apportioning indirect expenses to products, departments or jobs must be
fair and equitable.

TOPIC 2
COST CLASSIFICATION
DEFINATION AND PURPOSE OF COST CLASSIFICATION
Definition
Cost classification is the process of grouping costs according to their common characteristics. A
suitable classification of costs is of vital importance in order to identify the cost with cost centres
or cost units. Cost may be classified accounting to their nature, i.e., material, labor and expenses
and a number of other characteristics. The same cost figures are classified according to different
ways of costing depending upon the purpose to be achieved and requirements of particular
concern.
Purpose of cost classification
1. Preparation of budget: classification of cost helps in preparation of the budget of the

organization. For preparing the budget of an organization one must know how and where
exactly the expenses have been incurred in relation to manufacturing the product. On the
basis of this classification of the cost an organization accordingly prepares its budget.
2. Helps in measuring efficiency: classification of cost helps in measuring the

efficiency of the organization. On the basis of the places where the costs have been
incurred and the amount of cost that has been incurred the efficiency of the organization
can be judged.
3. Controlling cost:
 Labour cost: with the help of classification of cost an organization can control its
labour cost as well. If the labour complete their task well in time and with much
efficiency then the organization would be able to reduce its labour cost.
 Material cost: material cost can be controlled if material wastage is avoided and
proper standardization of materials is used. Thus with the help of classification of
cost an organization is able to reduce the cost incurred on materials and thus able
to control material cost.
 Overhead cost: overhead comprises indirect expenditure incurred in
manufacturing. By knowing the amount that has been incurred under various
heads an organization can device ways to reduce the cost. Thus with the help of
classification of cost an organization is able to control overhead cost.

4. Expansion of the organization: if an organization knows where exactly it incurs
expenditure then it can device ways to control these costs. Once an organization is able to
control its cost then it can concentrate on its expansion. Thus with the help of
classification of cost an organization is able to device ways for its expansion.
Thus, classification of cost is of immense importance for an organization. With the help
of classification of cost an organization can make progress and also expand its production
by controlling its cost. Thus in the long run an organization can move towards higher
productivity and thus higher profits and can achieve its goals.
METHODS OF COST CLASSIFIICATION
MANUFACTURING COSTS
Definition and Explanation of manufacturing cost:
Manufacturing costs are those costs that are directly involved in manufacturing of products and
services. Examples of manufacturing costs include raw materials costs and salary of labor
workers. Manufacturing cost is divided into three broad categories by most companies.
1. Direct materials cost

2. Direct labor cost
3. Manufacturing overhead cost.
Direct Materials Cost:
The materials that go into final product are called raw materials. This term is somewhat
misleading, since it seems to imply unprocessed natural resources like wood pulp or iron ore.
Actually raw materials refer to any materials that are used in the final product; and the finished
product of one company can become raw material of another company. For example plastic
produced by manufacturers of plastic is a finished product for them but is a raw material for
Compaq Computers for its personal computers.
Direct Materials are those material that become an integral part of the finished product and that
can be physically and conveniently traced to it. Examples include tiny electric motor that
Panasonic uses in its CD players to make the CD spin. According to a study of 37 manufacturing
industries material costs averaged about 55% of sales revenue.
Sometimes it is not worth the effort to trace the costs of relatively insignificant materials to the
end products. Such minor items would include the solder used to make electrical connection in a
Sony TV or the glue used to assemble a chair. Materials such as solder or glue are called indirect
materials and are included as part of manufacturing overhead, which is discussed later on this
page.

Direct Labor Cost:
The term direct labor is reserved for those labor costs that can be essentially traced to individual
units of products. Direct labor is sometime called touch labor, since direct labor workers
typically touch the product while it is being made. The labor cost of assembly line workers, for
example, is a direct labor cost, as would the labor cost of carpenter, bricklayer and machine
operator
Labor costs that cannot be physically traced to the creation of products, or that can be traced only
at a great cost and inconvenience, are termed indirect labor and treated as part of manufacturing
overhead, along with indirect materials. Indirect labor includes the labor costs of janitors,
supervisors, materials handlers, and night security guards. Although the efforts of these workers
are essential to production, it would be either impractical or impossible to accurately trace their
costs to specific units of product. Hence, such labor costs are treated as indirect labor.
In some industries, major shifts are taking place in the structure of labor costs. Sophisticated
automated equipment, run and maintained by skilled workers, is increasingly replacing direct
labor. In a few companies, direct labor has become such a minor element of cost that it has
disappeared altogether as a separate cost category. However the vast majority of manufacturing
and service companies throughout the world continue to recognize direct labor as a separate cost
category.
According to a study of 37 manufacturing industries, direct labor averaged only about 10% of
sales revenue.
Direct Materials cost combined with direct labor cost is called prime cost.
In equation form:
Prime Cost = Direct Materials Cost + Direct Labor Cost
For example total direct materials cost incurred by the company is $4,500 and direct labor cost is
$3,000 then prime cost is $7,500 ($4,500 + $3,000).
Manufacturing Overhead Cost:
Manufacturing overhead, the third element of manufacturing cost, includes all costs of
manufacturing except direct material and direct labor. Examples of manufacturing overhead
include items such as indirect material, indirect labor, maintenance and repairs on production
equipment and heat and light, property taxes, depreciation, and insurance on manufacturing
facilities. Indirect materials are minor items such as solder and glue in manufacturing industries.
These are not included in direct materials costs. Indirect labor is a labor cost that cannot be trace
to the creation of products or that can be traced only at great cost and inconvenience. Indirect
labor includes the labor cost of janitors, supervisors, materials handlers and night security
guards. Costs incurred for heat and light, property taxes, insurance, depreciation and so forth
associated with selling and administrative functions are not included in manufacturing overhead.

Studies have found that manufacturing overhead averages about 16% of sales revenue.
Manufacturing overhead is known by various names, such as indirect manufacturing cost, factory
overhead, and factory burden. All of these terms are synonymous with manufacturing overhead.
Manufacturing overhead cost combined with direct labor is called conversion cost.
In equation form:
Conversion Cost = Direct Labor Cost + Manufacturing Overhead Cost
For example if total direct labor cost is $3,000 and total manufacturing overhead cost is $2,000
then conversion cost is $5,000 ($3,000 + $2,000).
Non-manufacturing Costs:
Definition and explanation of non-manufacturing cost:
Non-manufacturing costs are those costs that are not incurred to manufacture a product.
Examples of such costs are salary of sales person and advertising expenses. Generally non-
manufacturing costs are further classified into two categories.
1. Marketing and Selling Costs

2. Administrative Costs
Marketing or Selling Costs:
Marketing or selling costs include all costs necessary to secure customer orders and get the
finished product into the hands of the customers. These costs are often called order getting or
order filling costs. Examples of marketing or selling costs include advertising costs, shipping
costs, sales commission and sales salary.
Administrative Costs:
Administrative costs include all executive, organizational, and clerical costs associated with
general management of an organization rather than with manufacturing, marketing, or selling.
Examples of administrative costs include executive compensation, general accounting,
secretarial, public relations, and similar costs involved in the overall, general administration of
the organization as a whole.
FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION
Production, Administration, Selling & Distribution are three important functions of a business
concern. Taking these functions into consideration, costs have been classified by:

a) Production or Manufacturing Cost: Manufacturing costs are those costs which are
incurred in the course of manufacture. It includes cost of raw material, cost of labour,
other direct cost and factory indirect cost. Example of production or manufacturing costs
may be power, lighting, heating, rent, depreciation etc.
b) Office and Administration Cost: These costs are incurred for the general administration
of the enterprise. It includes office costs as well as administration cost. For example,
salary of office staff, rent of office building, electricity charges, audit fee, printing and
stationeries etc.
c) Selling and Distribution Cost: It includes both selling cost as well as distribution cost.
Selling costs are those costs which are incurred in connection with the selling of goods
and services Distribution costs are those costs which are incurred on despatch of finished
goods to the consumers. Example of selling and distribution costs are: sales men salary,
packing charges, carriage, out ward, advertisement, ware house charges etc.
BEHAVIORAL CLASSIFICATION
Cost behavior means how costs will respond or react to changes in the activity level. ie. as we
increase output or sales, are the costs rising, dropping or remaining the same. Cost Behavior can
be used to produce various classifications of costs such as:
Costs will be classified according to nature or behavior in relationship to change in the levels of
production such as:
i) Variable costs
ii) Fixed costs
iii) Semi fixed costs
Variable costs
These are directly proportional to the level of activity.
If the number of units produced doubles, then variable production costs will double also. An
example would be the cost of material used to produce units.
If the number of units sold increases by 20% then variable selling and distribution costs would
increase by 20% also.
On a graph, variable costs would look like:

Fixed costs
Constant over a wide range of activity
An example would be the factory rent. It does no matter how many units are made, the rent is
fixed.
On a graph, fixed costs would appear as:
Note that the cost per unit will decrease as the activity level decreases. For example, say that the
rent was $10,000 and 1,000 units were made. Then you could argue that it takes $10 rent to make
a unit ($10,000/1,000).
If, however, 10,000 units were made, the rental cost per unit would be only $1 ($10,000/10,000).
Higher production volumes are making better use of the fixed resource.

Semi-variable costs
Have a fixed element and a variable element.
An example would be a telephone bill. Usually there is a fixed cost for the line rental then each
minute of telephone calls causes an additional cost.
On a graph, fixed costs would appear as:
COST CLASSIFICATION
CLASSIFICATION OF COST ACCORDING TO CONTROLLABILITY
Under this method, costs are classified according to whether or not they are influenced by the
action of a given member of the undertaking. On this basis cost is classified into two categories.
1. Controllable cost: Controllable costs are those which can be influenced by the action of
a specified member of an undertaking. Generally speaking all directs costs including
direct materials, direct labor and some of the overhead expenses are controllable by the
lower level management.
2. Uncontrollable cost: These are the cost which cannot be influenced by the action of a
specified member of undertakings. Most of fixed costs such as rent of buildings, salary
to managerial persons, wages of skilled workers, etc. are uncontrollable.

CLASSIFICATION ACCORDING TO TIME
Costs can be classified in to historical or actual costs and predetermined or future cost.
 Historical cost- It relates to the usual method of determining actual cost of operation
based on actual expenses incurred during the period. Such evaluation of costs takes
longer time, till the accounts are closed and finalized, and figures are already for use in
cost calculations.
 Predetermined cost- It is prepared in advance before the actual operation starts on the
basis of specializations and historical cost data of the earlier period and all factors
effecting cost. Predet3ermined cost is therefore future cost and may be either estimated or
standard.
 Estimated cost is prepared before accepting an order for submitting price quotation. It is
also used for comparing actual performance.
 Standard cost is scientifically predetermined cost of a product or service applicable
during a specific period of immediate future under current or anticipated operating
conditions. The method consists of setting standards for each elements of cost, evaluating
the variance from standard cost and finding reasons for such variance, so that remedial
steps can be taken promptly to check inefficient performance.
CLASSIFICATION BY RELATIONSHIP WITH ACCOUNTING PERIOD
Classifications are measured by the period of use and benefit. The capital expenditure and
revenue expenditure are classified under it. Revenue expenses relate to current accounting
period. Capital expenditures are the benefits beyond accounting period. Fixed assets come under
category of capital expenditure and maintenance of assets comes under revenue expenditure
category.
CLASSIFICATION BASED ON IDENTIFICATION WITH INVENTORY
Under this classification, costs are classified according to the function they perform in an
organization. Costs can functionally be classified as:
33S T U D Y T E X T
(a) Product costs: are all the costs incurred in production of units during a time period e.g. raw
material costs, direct labour costs and production overheads. Such costs are capitalized and
expensed (charged to the profit and loss account) only when the manufacturer sells inventory.
These costs may be carried from one period to the other.
(b) Period costs: these are costs mainly incurred in the ordinary running of the business
enterprise. They include costs like electricity bill paid, salaries and allowances and rent
payments. They are referred to as period costs since they are expensed in the period they are
incurred.

CLASSIFICATION FOR DECISION MAKING
a) Sunk costs: these are costs, which have already been incurred. They cannot be changed
by any decision made after incurrence. Such costs are irrelevant for decision making. For
example, cost of a delivery van already acquired by the organization shall be irrelevant as
it cannot be changed by any course of action taken by management.
b) Marginal cost: is the additional cost of producing an extra unit of output.
c) Opportunity cost: is defined as the cost of the next best foregone alternative or the
potential benefit that is lost by taking one course of action and giving up the other. For
instance, by deciding to take on a leave and forego wages, the opportunity cost of the
decision shall be the foregone wages.
d) Differential cost/incremental cost: these are costs that differ among alternatives.
They are costs relevant for decision making. They may be either variable or fixed. For
instance, if taking up a different business apartment amounts to an extra Shs2,000 rent
expense, the differential (incremental) cost of the decision shall be the Sh.2,000.
e) Imputed cost
Is an expense not incurred directly, but actually borne e.g example, a person who owns a
home debt-free has an imputed rent expense equal to the amount of interest that could be
earned on the proceeds from the sale of the home if the home weresold.
f) Replacement cost
The amount it would cost to replace an asset at current prices. If the cost of replacing an
asset in its current physical condition is lower than the cost of replacing the asset so as to
obtain the level of services enjoyed when the asset was bought, then the asset is in poor
condition and the firm would probably not want to replace it
g) Standard cost
A management tool used to estimate the overall cost of production, assuming normal
operations.
h) Budgeted cost
This is the cost estimated to be incurred and used for budgeting purposes. It is a cost
included in the budget representing cost expected. Most of the times, budgeted cost will
be derived from standard cost.

TOPIC 3
COST ESTIMATION
MEANING OF COST ESTIMATION
A cost estimate is the approximation of the cost of a program, project, or operation. The cost
estimate is the product of the cost estimating process. The cost estimate has a single total value
and may have identifiable component values. A problem with a cost overruncan be avoided with
a credible, reliable, and accurate cost estimate. An estimator is the professional who prepares
cost estimates.
METHODS OF ESTIMATING COST
Non mathematical methods

These include;
1. Engineering method
2. Accounts analysis
3. High-low method
Mathematical methods
These include;-
4. Scatter graph method
5. Ordinary Least Squares Regression Method
Cost estimation methods are necessary only for costs that are identified as mixed costs. There is
no need to apply an estimation method to break a cost into fixed and variable portions if you
have already determined it is solely fixed or solely variable. All four methods produce estimates
of amounts of fixed and variable costs.
The Goal of Cost Estimation

The ultimate goal of cost estimation is to determine the amount of fixed and variable costs to
create a cost formula to be used to predict future costs. The cost formula, or cost equation, is the
output of the cost estimation process. Because you have only one variable (number of units), the
formula will be a straight line, or linear equation. (You should remember the concept of
functions from your middle school math classes.1) The formula that represents the equation of a
line will appear in the format of:

= +
where Y = total cost
m = the slope of the line, i.e., unit variable cost
X = the number of units of activity
b = the y-intercept, i.e., total fixed costs
Recall that the = + is the equivalent equation used in accounting for estimating
costs. The total cost side of the equation (Y) can also be expressed as f(x) so that the formula
appears as:
( ) = +
As such, the equation is often referred to as a function. In accounting, it is referred to as a cost

function because the 'Y' equates to total cost.
Determining a linear function is useful in predicting cost amounts at different levels of activity.
This is useful because managers must be able to predict costs to plan for future operations. This
is often accompanied by what-if analysis that assists with the preparation of budgets, pricing of
products or services, and other key management functions.
Cost Equation Components

Your goal it to determine the cost equation for a particular cost, so that managers can estimate
'total' costs at various activity levels. The cost equation will contain the variable cost per unit and
total fixed costs. These two amounts remain the same at all levels of activity within the relevant
range.
The variable cost component of the cost equation is displayed with two decimals in standard
form because it is a unit cost (and unit costs are always displayed with two decimal places). The
total fixed cost component of the cost equation is displayed with no decimals.
1. ENGINEERING METHOD
The Engineering Cost Estimating method builds the overall cost estimate by summing detailed
estimates done at lower levels of the Work Breakdown Structure (WBS). It’s a technique where
the system being costed is broken down into lower-level components (such as parts or
assemblies), each of which is costed separately for direct labor, direct material, and other costs.
Engineering estimates for direct labor hours may be based on analyses of engineering drawings
and contractor or industry-wide standards.
Engineering estimates for direct material may be based on discrete raw material and purchase
part requirements. The remaining elements of cost (such as quality control or various overhead
charges) may be factored from the direct labor and material costs. The various discrete cost
estimates are aggregated by simple algebraic equations (hence the common name “bottoms-up”

estimate). The use of engineering estimates requires extensive knowledge of a system’s (and its
components’) characteristics, and lots of detailed data.
Because of the high level of detail, each step of the work flow should be identified, measured,
and tracked, and the results for each outcome should be summed to make the point estimate.
The several advantages to the Engineering Cost estimating method include:
 The estimator’s ability to determine exactly what the estimate includes and whether
anything was overlooked,
 Its unique application to the specific program and manufacturer,
 That it gives good insight into major cost contributors, and
 Easy transfer of results to other programs.
Some disadvantages of the Engineering Cost estimating method include:
 It can be expensive to implement and it is time consuming

 It is not flexible enough to answer what-if questions
 New estimates must be built for each alternative
 The product specification must be well known and stable
 All product and process changes must be reflected in the estimate
2. ACCOUNT ANALYSIS
Under account analysis method, the accountant examines and classifies each ledger account as
variable, fixed or mixed. Mixed accounts are broken down into their variable and fixed
components. They base these classifications on experience, inspection of cost behavior for
several past periods or intuitive feelings of the manager.
This is with a view to develop a cost function in the form = +
Illustration
Suppose a company ABC has the following costs with a value of 7000 units.
Amount Variable Fixed
Direct labour 150,000 150,000 -
Materials 125,000 125,000 -
Repairs and maintenance 5,000 5,000 -
Depreciation 15,000 - 15,000
Administration 1,000 - 1,000
overheads 4,000 - 4,000
Indirect labour 300,000 280,000 20,000

Required;-
Determine the cost equation using account classification method and determine the cost of
producing 1,400 units
Solution
,
Variable cost b = =Shs 40
,
a = shs 20,000
Substituting in the Equation y= a +bx

Y= 20,000 + 40x
Hence the cost of producing 1400 units is
Y= 20,000 + 40(1,400)
Shs. 76,000
Illustration
In the year 2012 VIP incurred the following expenses to maintain 1500 lecturers.
Sh
Administration expenses (40% variable) 4,000,000
Lecturing pay (60% variable) 8,000,000
Airtime allowance (fixed) 1,000,000
Sundry expenses (50% fixed) 500,000
Soda allowance (variable) 300,000
Required;-
a) Using accounts analysis method, express an equation in form y = a + bx
b) Using the equation expressed above, estimate the total cost of 2000 lecturers incurred to be
employed in 2013.
Solution
Total cost Variable Fixed
Administration expenses 4,000,000 1,600,000 2,400,000
Lecturing pay 8,000,000 4,800,000 3,200,000
Airtime allowance 1,000,000 - 1,000,000
Sundry expenses 500,000 250,000 250,000
Soda allowance 300,000 300,000 ______
6,950,000 6,850,000
, ,
b= = 4633.33 a = 6,850,000

(a) y = a + bx ∴ y = 6,850 + 4633.33x
(b) For 2000 lecturers
Total cost y = 6,850,000 + 4,633.33 ×2,000 = Shs. 16,116,660
3. HIGH –LOW (OR RANGE) METHOD.
In this method the highest and lowest activity together with their corresponding costs is
identified. The two points i.e. the lowest and the highest are used to derive a cost function in the
form of
= +
This method is based on an analysis of historical information of costs at different activity levels.
The high-low method finds the equation of the straight line joining the two points corresponding
to the highest and lowest activity levels. What we need to do is to separately identify the fixed
and variable cost elements so that each can be predicted for anticipated future activity levels.
The variable cost is estimated by calculating the average unit cost between the highest and
lowest volumes and the fixed and total cost function can then be derived.
For example, if the costs of producing the highest and lowest levels of production (10 units and
12 units) are shs.30 and shs.35 respectively then the variable costs per unit are sh. 5/2 units or sh.
2.50. The fixed costs are thus £5 and the total cost = sh.5 + sh. 2.50x where x = production level.
Illustration
Production Total cost
(units) sh.
High 120 3,500
Low 100 3,000
Change 20 500
.
Variable cost = = sh.25 per unit
Fixed cost = sh. 3,000 – (100 x sh. 2.5) = sh.500

Total cost = sh.500 + sh.25 x units
Limitations
The limitations of the high-low method are as follows
 Its reliance on historical data, assuming that (i) activity is the only factor affecting cost and
(ii) historical costs reliably predict future costs.
 The use of only two values, the highest and the lowest, means that the results may be
distorted because of random variations in these values.
4. THE SCATTER GRAPH METHOD
For this method a scatter diagram is constructed which is used to visually i.e. by inspection
deduce a relationship from observed pattern if there is any. By obtaining any two points on
constructed graph, we can fit a straight line if the pattern suggests a linear relationship.
Y
- Non-linear relationship
x x x x - Quadratic since has one
x x
x x x turning point
x x xx x
x x x x
x
x x
x x x No relationship between x and y

x
x x x xx
x x
x x x x x
x x x x x
x x
x x Linear but inverse relationship

x x
x x
x
x x
x
x x

Illustration
Cost and activity data are plotted in a similar manner to that above and a line drawn at an angle
which is judged to be the best representation of the slope of the plotting.
Sh.
1800 -
1600 -
1400 -
x x
1200 - x x x
1000 - x x x
x x
x x
800 - x x x
x
600 -
400 -
200 -
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
Units of output
Scatter graph showing visual line of best fit.
The dotted line is drawn to show the intersection with the vertical axis and thus gives an estimate
of the fixed content of the cost being considered, in this case 6400. The slope of the line, i.e. the
variable element, is found as follows:
Cost @ zero activity = sh.400

Cost @ 100 units activity = sh.1,250
,
= sh. 8.5
Therefore the estimate cost function = sh. 400 + 8.5x where x = units of output, i.e. the
independent variable.
The graphical method is simple to use and provides a visual indication of approximate cost
behavior. Because each individual is likely to draw a different line with a different slope the
method is subjective and approximate. A more objective and accurate approach is to calculate
the line of best fit mathematically using the least squares method.

Advantages of visual fit method
1. It takes into account all the observations unlike the high low method.
2. It is easy to apply.
Disadvantages of visual –fit method

1. It cannot be used for two or more independent variables
2. We cannot measure the size of probable error.
3. It is subjective to some extent.
5. ORDINARY LEAST SQUARES REGRESSION METHOD
Regression analysis is a technique that uses a statistical model to measure the amount of change
in one variable (dependent variable) that is associated with changes in amounts of one or more
variables.
This method is used to determine the equation of the line of best fit by minimizing the sum of the
squares of the vertical
When it has been established that a causal relationship exists in the data and that a linear function
is appropriate the statistical technique known as least squares is frequently used to establish
values for the coefficients a and b (representing fixed and variable cost respectively) in the linear
cost function.
= +
where y is total cost – the dependent variable

and x is the agreed measure of activity – the independent variable
The values of a and b are determined after substituting data.
i) In the normal equation below.
 y  n a  b  x............................................(i)
2
 x y  a x  b  x ...................................(ii)
ii) In the formulas below
b
n  xy   x  y
a
 y  b x _ _
or a  y  b x
n x 2  ( x ) 2 n

When it has been established that a causal relationship exists in the data and that a linear function
is appropriate the statistical technique known as least squares is frequently used to establish
values for the coefficients a and b (representing fixed and variable cost respectively) in the linear
cost function.
= +
Where y is total cost – the dependent variable and x is the agreed measure of activity – the
independent variable
Characteristics of linear regression
1. It is objectively determined.
2. It makes use of all the data or observations
3. It minimizes the sum of squares of the error terms
4. If there is a linear relationship between the dependent and independent variable, this
method gives the best predictions within the relevant range.
Illustration
The following table shows the number of units of a good produced and the total costs incurred.
Units produced Total costs
100 40,000
200 45,000
300 50,000
400 65,000
500 70,000
600 70,000
700 80,000
Calculate the regression line for y and n.
Solution
Notes on the calculation

The calculation can reduced to a series of steps as follows;-
Step 1:
Tabulate the data and determine which is the dependent variable, y, and which the independent x.
Step 2:
Calculate∑ , ∑ , ∑ , ∑ (leave room for a column for ∑ which may well be needed
subsequently)

Step 3;
Substitute in the formation in order to find b and a in that order.
Step 4;
Substitute a and b in the regression equation.
The calculation is set out as follows, where x is the activity level in units of hundreds and y is the
cost in units of sh.1, 000.
x y xy x2
1 40 40 1
2 45 90 4
3 50 150 9
4 65 260 16
5 70 350 25
6 70 420 36
7 80 560 49
28 420 1,870 140 n=7
∑ ∑ ∑
b= ∑ (∑ )
Try to avoid rounding at this stage since, although n ∑ are large, their difference is much
smaller.
( , ) ( ) , , ,
= ( ) (
= = = 6.79
)
∑ ∑
a = – = – 6.79 = 60 – 27.16= 32.84
Therefore the regressional line for y on x is:

y = 32.84 + 6.79x (x in hundreds of units produced, y in sh.1,000).
(Always specify what x and y are very carefully)
This line would be used to estimate the total costs for a given level of output. If, say, 250 units
were made we can predict the expected yield by using the regression line where x = 2.5.
y = 32.84 + 6.79 x 2.5 = 32.84 + 16.975 = 49.815
i.e. we predict total costs of sh.49,815 for production of 250 units.

Using the regression line for forecasting
In the previous example, having found the equation of the line of best fit, we used this to forecast
the total cost for a given level of activity.
The validity of such forecasts will be dependent upon two main factors.
 Whether there is sufficient correlation between the variables to support a linear
relationship within the range of the data used.
 Whether the forecast represents an interpolation or an extrapolation
Illustration
The following data have been collected on costs and output:
Output (000s) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Costs (sh.000s) 14 17 15 23 18 22 31
Required;-
Calculate the coefficients in the linear cost function.
y = a + bx
Using
i) The Normal Equation and (ii) the coefficient formulae
Solution
Output (x) Costs (y) Xy x2
1 14 14 1
2 17 34 4
3 15 45 9
4 23 92 16
5 18 90 25
6 22 132 36
7 31 217 49
Σx = 28 Σy = 140 Σxy = 624 Σx2 = 140
Where n = 7 (i.e. number of pairs of readings)
i) Using the normal equations
140 = 7a + 28b ………..I

624 = 28a + 140b ……….. II

And eliminating one coefficient thus
624 = 28a + 140b ………..I
560 = 28a + 112b ……….. 1 x 4
64 = 28b
∴ b = 2.286 and, substituting this value in one of the equations, the value of a is found to
be 10.86
∴ Regression line is y = 10.86 + 2.26x
ii) Using the coefficient formulae
( ) ( )
a= = 10.86
( )
( ) ( )
b= = 2.286
( )
When the coefficients have been calculated the cost function can be used for forecasting simply
by inserting the appropriate level of activity i.e. a value for x, and calculating the resulting total
cost.
For example, what are the predicted costs at output levels of:
a) 4,500 units (i.e. 4.5 in ‘000s), and

b) 8,000 units (i.e. 8 in ‘000s)
y = 10.86 + 2.286 (4.5) = sh. 21,147
Note: A prediction within the range of the original observations (1 to 7 in Example 1) is known
as an interpolation.
y = 10.86 + 2.286 (8) = sh.29,148
Note: A prediction outside the range of original observations is known as an extrapolation.

REVISION QUESTIONS
QUESTION ONE
The management of Limuru Processing Company Limited wishes to obtain better cost estimates
to evaluate the company’s operations more effectively.
The following information is provided to you for analysis:
Year 2004 Equivalent production Overheads

Month Units (‘000’) Sh.’000’
January 1,425 12,185
February 950 9,875
March 1,130 10,450
April 1,690 15,280
May 1,006 9,915
June 834 9,150
July 982 10,133
August 1,259 11,981
September 1,385 12,045
October 1,420 13,180
November 1,125 13,180
December 980 10,430
Additional information:
1. In November, the opening work in progress inventory contained 1,000,000 units that were
30% complete with respect to conversion costs.
2. During the same month of November, the manufacturing department transferred 1,500,000
units.
3. The closing inventory for the month of November was 1,200,000 units and the units were
305 incomplete with respect to conversion costs
4. Using the above information, you have obtained the following variables by applying simple
regression analysis.
Sh. ‘000’
Constant 3,709
Slope 6,487
Required:
i) Use the high-low method to estimate the overhead cost function.
ii) Use the regression method to determine the overhead cost function.

iii) Compute the equivalent units of production with respect to conversion costs for the
month of November using the FIFO method.
iv) Use the regression function formulated in (ii) above to estimate the overhead cost for
the month of November.
Solution:
i) Use the high-low method to estimate the overhead cost function
Highest cost (OHs) - 15,280 level of activity 1690

Lowest cost (OHs) - 9150 level of activity 834
Range = 15,280 – 9,150 = 6130 = 7.16

1690 – 834 856
Y = a + bx whereb = 7.16
Y = 15,280
Therefore 15,280 = a + 7.16 x 1690
a = 15,280 – (7.16 x 1690)
a = 3180
Therefore y = 3,180,000 + 7160x
ii) Use the regression method – determine the overhead cost function
y = a + bx where a = 3,709,000
b = 6487
Therefore y = 3,709,000 + 6487x
iii) Equivalent units of production

Looking at the output side using FIFO method
Completion % Conversion
Opening stock (WIP) 1,000,000 70 700,000
Completely processed during production 500,000 100 500,000
Closing stock (WIP) 1,200,000 1,199,695
Equivalent units with respect to conversion costs 2,399,695
iv) Estimate on cost for the month of November

Y = 3,709,000 +06487x where x = 1125
Therefore y = 3,709,000 + 6487 x 1125

= 11,006,875

QUESTION TWO
(a)Explain the advantages and disadvantages of the high-low method of cost estimation.
(b)Central Machinery Ltd. is preparing its budget for the year ending 30 June 2004. For the fuel
expenses consumption it is decided to estimate an equation of the form, y = a + bx, where
y is the total expense at an activity level x, a is the fixed expense and b is the rate of
variable cost.
The following information relate to the year ended 30 June 2003:
Month Machine Fuel Oil Month Machine Fuel oil

hours expense hours expense
2003 (Sh. ‘000’) (Sh. ‘000’) 2004 (Sh. (Sh. ‘000’)
‘000’)
July 34 640 January 26 500
August 30 620 February 26 500
September 34 620 March 31 530
October 39 590 April 35 550
November 42 500 May 43 580
December 32 530 June 48 680
The annual total and monthly average figures for the year ended 30 June 2003 were as
follows:
Machine Fuel oil

hours expense
(‘000’) (Sh. ‘000’)
Annual total 420 6,840
Monthly 35 570
average
Required:
(i) Using the high-low method, estimate and interpret the fixed and variable cost elements of
the fuel oil expense.
(ii) Using the results in (i) above, predict the fuel oil expense for November 2004 if
experience indicates that 41,000 machine hours will be used.
(iii) Briefly explain any two limitations of High-low method of cost estimation that may be
overcome by using simple linear regression analysis.

Solution:
(a) Advantages of high-low method

 Method is easy to use
 Not many data are needed
 Visually it gives the general direction of the trend
Disadvantages
 Choice of the high and low points is subjective
 Method does not use all available data
 Cannot be used for more than one independent variable
 Not possible to defend the results statistically
 If the two points are outliers, the predictive equation will be wrong.
 Method may not be reliable
(b) (i) High-low method

Machine hours Fuel oil expense
Sh. ‘000’ Sh. ‘000’
High-point (June 2004) 48 680
Low-point (January, 2004) 26 500
Difference 22 180
Variable cost per machine hour = 180,000

22,000
= Sh.8.182 per hour
Substituting for January 2004

Variable costs (26 × 8.182) = 212,730
Fixed cost (difference) 287,270
500,000
Interpretation:
Within the relevant range, Sh.282,270 will be incurred irrespective of the machine hour usage of
the unit i.e. 282,270 is fixed.
The total fuel consumption will thereafter vary at the rate of Sh.8.182 for each machine hour
usage.
(ii) Fuel expense in November, 2004
= 287,264 + 8.182 x 41,000
= Sh.622,726
(iii) Limitations of high-low method
 Relies only on two data points – highest and lowest which may be outside and
therefore not representative of the entire data set.
 The method does not use robust statistical techniques, to measure the predictive
quality of the resultant function.

TOPIC 4
COST ACCUMULATION
DEFINITION
Cost accumulation is the use of an accounting system to collect and maintain a database of the
expenses incurred by a business in the course of its operation.
The two main forms of cost accumulation are

a) a job order system where direct materials, staffing and overhead costs are collected under
assigned job number
b) A process costing system where costs are maintained and associated with a particular cost
center.
ACCOUNTING FOR MATERIALS AND INVENTORY
MATERIAL COSTING
Inventory consists of raw materials, W.I.P, consumer goods and spare parts etc.
Material costing entails the study of the inventory control systems of the items.
Stock costs
i) Purchase costs
Actual amount paid to the supplier of the stock item.
ii) Ordering costs

Costs of obtaining inventory Include
a) Clerical and admin cost associated with purchasing and receiving goods.
b) Transportation costs from supplier
iii) Holding costs

Are costs incurred as a result of keeping inventories of stores
It depends in quantities held may include:-
a) Cost of storage and stores operation e.g. rent and storage spares, salaries for staff.
b) Insurance costs – the higher the rate for inventory held the higher the premium.
c) Cost of capital – opportunity cost of capital held in the stocks
d) Risks of deterioration / deterioration cost.

iv) Stock – out costs.
Arises where stocks kept are low which may lead to the company not being able to satisfy
demand since stocks are not enough
These costs include:-
a) Lost contribution due to unrealized sales.
b) Loss of future sales due to dissatisfied customers.
c) Loss of goodwill
d) Cost of production stoppage
e) Extra cost of urgent orders.
v) Optimal stock level

Stocks held should be maintained at optimal levels to help regulate the GNL of costs due to
problem of overstocking and undertaking.
This levels will help determine when the order, how much to order, the quantity to be held.
These levels include:-
a) The re-order level

This is that point once reached and order was to be placed with the supplier. It is the quantity in
stocks that goods will be ordered to avoid stock-outs. It is determined by considering the
expected the expected demand during re-order or lead time.
This is the amount that will be consumed during the time for waiting for deliveries. It should
satisfy the highest demand.
Recorder = max .consumption × max. Reorder period.
b) Maximum Stock level

The highest quantity of stock that can be held at any particular time .Stocks may not be allowed
to go beyond this level.
Max. Stock Level = re-order level + orderquantity - (Minimum consumption × Min.re-order

period)
c) Minimum stock levels

This is the lowest quantity of stocks that should be held. Stocks should not be allowed to fall
below this level. Also known as buffer level

Max. Stock = re-order + re-order - (Normal × Normal)
Level level quantity consumption lead time
Reorder level = Maximum Consumption x Maximum Re-order period

280000 x 5=1,400,000 units
Minimum Stock Level = Re-order level (Normal cons. ×Normal lead-time)

1,400,000 – (200,000 ×4) =600 units
Maximum Stock level = Reorder level + Qty. demanded – (Min stock ×Min. lead-time)
= 1,400,000 + 5,000 – (50,000 ×3)
= 1,381,000 units
STOCK VALUATION
In a period stocks are normally purchased at different price and for product costing purposes and
profit determination stock have to be appropriately valued. This is because when stocks are
transferred to the stores they loss their identity and the issue price may not be accurately
determined because they are many in the store.
There are two systems of stock valuation i.e.

a) Periodic stock take system /physical stock takes
This involves actual counting, checking and verification of stock available in the stores at the
end of the period. The stock will normally be determined after stock take to enhance
accuracy, normally close down for the stock take exercise.
b) Perpetual / Continuous system
A transaction system where stock records are maintained as per transaction each receipt or
issue of stock is recorded and stock records. Therefore readily available and this help address
the problem of overstocking/under stocking.
To enhance accuracy each stock item must have its own stock record where the transactions will
be recorded. There are several methods which can be used to maintain records for valuation
purposes. These methods have been discussed below.
1) First in first out (FIFO)

Accounting: Method of inventoryvaluation based on the assumption that goods are sold or used
in the same chronological order in which they are bought. Hence, the cost of goods purchased
first (first-in) is the cost of goods sold first (first-out). During periods of high inflation-rates, the
FIFO method yields higher value of the ending inventory, lower cost of goods sold, and a higher
gross profit (hence the higher taxable income) than that yielded by the last-in first-out (LIFO)
method. The 'in' officebasket is an illustration of FIFO method

Illustration
NyaliMbali Ltd. are retailers who sell ceramic tiles. During the months of July to September
2000, there were price fluctuations. Due to the above problem the company had to adjust its
selling prices.
The following transactions took place during the period.

3 July Opening stock was 5,000 tiles valued at Sh 825,000.
10 July Orders placed with the company increased, so extra tiles had to be
obtained from Mombasa. Therefore 22,000 tiles were purchased at a cost
Sh 140 each but in addition, there was a freight and insurance charge of Sh
5 per tile.
31 July During the month 20,0000 tiles were sold at a price of Sh 220 each.
4 August A new batch of 14,000 tiles was purchased at a cost of Sh 175 per tile.
30 August The sales for the month of August were 14,000 tiles at a selling price of Sh
230 each.
1 September A further 24,000 tiles were purchased at a cost of Sh 195 each.
30 September 270,000 tiles were sold during September at price of Sh 240 each.
The cost accountant of NyaliMbali Ltd decided he would apply first-in-first-out basis.
Required:
(i) A stores ledger account using first-in-first-out method and showing stock values at 30
September 2000.

Solution
NyaliMbali Ltd
Stores Ledger Account for July to September 2000 (Using FIFO Basis)
DATE RECEIPTS ISSUES BALANCES
Year Units Cost/ Value Unit Cost/ Value Units Cost/ Value
2000 unit (Shs) unit (Shs) unit (Shs)
July 3 5000 165 825,000
July 10 22,000 145 3,190,000 22,000 145 3,190,000
27,000 4,015,000
July 31 - - - 5,000 165 825,000
15,000 145 2,175,000
20,000 3,000,000 7,000 145 1,015,000
Aug 4 14,000 175 2,450,000 14,000 175 2,450,000
21,000 - 3,465,000
Aug 30 7,000 145 1,015,000
7,000 175 1,225,000
14,000 2,240,000 7,000 175 1,225,000
Sept 1 24,000 195 4,680,000 24,000 195 4,680,000
31,000 5,905,000
Sept 30 7,000 175 1,225,000
20,000 195 3,900,000
27,000 5,125,000 4,000 195 780,000
Totals 60,000 10,320,000 61,000 10,365,000

Sales: 31 July: 20,000 x 220 4,400,000
30 August: 14,000 x 230 3,220,000
30 September: 27,000 x 240 6,480,000
14,100,000
2) Last in first out (LIFO)

Accounting: Method of inventoryvaluation based on the assumption that the goods purchased
most recently (the last in) are sold or used first (the first out). The remaining items are assumed
to have been purchased at successively-earlier periods. In this method, value of the inventory at
the end of an accounting period is based on the value of items purchased earliest. During periods
of high inflation rates, the LIFO method yields lower value of the ending inventory, higher cost
of goods sold, and a lower gross profit (hence lower taxable income) than that yielded by the
application of the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. During prolonged inflationary periods,
however, LIFO method can seriously understate the value of inventory because the cost of
replacing it would be much higher than the value shown in accounts. The 'Out' office-basket is an
illustration of LIFO method.
Illustration
The following information relates to item P003 stocked by 2000 products Ltd for the month of
April 2012:
Receipts Issues
Date Units Units Unit cost (Sh)
April3 2,400 18
4 3,200
6 2,600 20
12 2,700
14 3,000 22
18 2,800 21
20 2,200
22 2,600 23
25 3,800
26 3,100 24
27 2,500 25
28 3,200 26
29 6,900
The closing balance for March 2012 was a batch of 3,000 units received at a unit price of Sh 19.

Required:
a) Stores perpetual inventory record for item P003 for May 2012 under LIFO system of stores
issues.
b) Closing stock valuation.
Solution
(a)
2000 Products Ltd

Store Perpetual Inventory Record for item P0003 for April 2000 Using LIFO
DATE RECEIPTS ISSUES BALANCE
Year Units Cost/Unit Value Units Cost/Unit Value Units Cost/Unit Value
2000
April Shs Shs Shs Shs Shs Shs
1 3,000 19 57,000
3 2,400 18 43,200 - - - 2,400 18 43,200
5,400 100,200
4 - - - 2,400 18 43,200
800 19 15,200
3,200 58,400 2,200 19 41,800
6 2,600 20 52,000 - - - 2,600 20 52,000
4,800 93,800
12 - - - 2,600 20 52,000
100 19 1,900
53,900 2,100 19 39,900
14 3,000 22 66,000 - - - 3,000 22 66,000
5,100 105,900
18 2,800 21 58,800 - - - 7,900 - 164,700
20 - - - 2,200 21 46,200 5,700 - 118,500
22 2,600 23 59,800 - - - 8,300 - 178,300
25 - - - 2,600 23 59,800
600 21 12,600
600 22 13,200
3,800 85,600 4,500 - 92,700
26 3,100 24 74,400 - - - 7,600 167,100
27 2,500 25 62,500 - - - 10,100 229,600

28 3,200 26 83,200 - - - 13,300 312,800
29 - - - 3,200 26 83,200
2,500 25 62,500
1,200 24 28,800
6,900 174,500 6,400 - 138,300
TOTALS 22,200 - 499,900 18,800 418,600
b) Valuation of Closing Stocks

Units Cost/Unit Amount
Shs Shs
2,100 19 39,900
2,400 22 52,800
1,900 24 45,600
6,400 138,300
3) Weighted Average
Under this method the price of material issued is determine by computing the average price
of all items held in stock.
The quantity for each batch are considered when calculating the average price, the average
price is calculated by dividing the total cost of stock items held by the total quantities
available.
Weighted average price = Total cost of all items held in stock

Number of stocks items available in store
Illustration
NyaliMbali Ltd. are retailers who sell ceramic tiles. During the months of July to September
2000, there were price fluctuations. Due to the above problem the company had to adjust its
selling prices.
The following transactions took place during the period.
3 July Opening stock was 5,000 tiles valued at Sh 825,000.
10 July Orders placed with the company increased, so extra tiles had to be obtained from
Mombasa. Therefore 22,000 tiles were purchased at a cost Sh 140 each but in
addition there was a freight and insurance charge of Sh 5 per tile.
31 July During the month 20,0000 tiles were sold at a price of Sh 220 each.
4 August A new batch of 14,000 tiles was purchased at a cost of Sh 175 per tile.
30 August The sales for the month of August were 14,000 tiles at a selling price of Sh 230
each.

1 September A further 24,000 tiles were purchased at a cost of Sh 195 each.
30 September 270,000 tiles were sold during September at price of Sh 240 each.
The cost accountant of NyaliMbali Ltd decided he would applyweighted average method
Required:
(i) A stores ledger account using weighted average method and showing stock values at 30
September 2000.
Solution
NyaliMbali Ltd
Stores Ledger Account for July to September 2000 (Using the Weighted Average
Approach)
Date RECEIPTS ISSUES BALANCES
Year Units Cost/ Value Unit Cost/ Value Units Cost/ Value
2000 unit (Shs) unit (Shs) unit (shs)
July 3 - - - - - - 5,000 165 825,000
July 10 22,000 145 3,190,000 - - - 22,000 145 3,190,000
27,000 149 4,015,000
July 31 - - - 20,000 149 2,974,074 7,000 149 1,040,926
Aug 4 14,000 175 2,450,000 - - - 14,000 175 2,450,000

21,000 - 3,490,926
Aug 30 - - - 14,000 166 2,327,284 7,000 166 1,163,642
Sept 1 24,000 195 4,680,000 24,000 195 4,680,000

31,000 188 5,843,642
Sept 30 - - - 27,000 188 5,089,624 4,000 188 754,018
Totals 60,000 10,320,000 61,000 10,390,982
4) Simple Average cost

The price of material issued is determined as an average prices existing in stocks. Quantities will
not be considered when calculating average price.
Issued quantities reduces quantity of earlier purchases receipt once the issued quantity is more
than the quantity in the patch, the price of the patch is removed from the existing prices.
Average price = Total of Existing Price

No of prices

Illustration
A company records the following transactions concerning the major products during the first
quarter of the year 2012
RECEIPTS
Date Quantity Price
January 2 2000 25
February 7 1000 27.50
March 25 1600 30
ISSUES
January 9 800
February 14 800
February 17 600
March 9 400
March 28 800
Required;-
A stores ledger card using the simple average method
STORES LEGDGER CARD USING SIMPLE AVERAGE METHOD

Date RECEIP ISSUES BALANC
Quantit TS Amoun Quantit Price/uni Amoun Quantit ES
January y Price/unit t y t t y Amount
2 2000 25 50000 - - 2000 50000
- - - 800 25 20000 1200 30000
9 1000 27.5 27500 - - - 2200 57500
February - - - 800 26.5 20800 1400 36700
7 - - - 600 26.5 15600 800 21100
- - - 400 27.5 11000 400 9750
14 1600 30 48000 - - - 2000 57750
- - - 800 28.75 23000 1200 34750
17
March
9
25
28
Standard Cost Method

It is a predetermined cost at the beginning of the period.
All issues during the period will be valued at the standard price. The standard price will only
consider the expected purchase price. If the expected purchase is expected to be 20.25 the
standard price of 23/= can be set and this is the price of all issues

Illustration
Consider the following
January Details Units Cost/Unit
4 Receipt 5200 80
6 Issue 4800 -
9 Receipt 4800 92
15 Issue 3600 -
16 Receipt 3600 96
17 Issue 2880 -
19 Issue 1920 -
23 Receipt 4800 104
25 Issue 1840 -
27 Receipt 3200 108
31 Issue 6000 -
The opening balance was 2000 units valued at sh.80 per unit
Required
Stores ledger card using standard price method if the standard issue price is sh.95
Solution
Date RECEIP ISSUE BALANC
January Quantit T Amoun Quantit Cost/Un Amoun E Amount
1 y Cost/Unit t y it t Quantity 160000
2 - - - - - - 2000 576000
6 5200 80 416000 - - - 7200 120000
9 - - - 4800 95 456000 2400 561600
15 4800 92 441600 - - - 7200 219600
16 - - - 3600 95 342000 3600 565200
17 3600 96 345600 - - - 7200 291600
19 - - - 2880 95 273600 4320 109200
23 - - - 1920 95 182400 2400 608400
25 4800 104 499200 - - - 7200 433600
27 - - - 1840 95 174800 5360 739200
31 3200 108 345600 - - - 8560 209200
- - - 6000 95 570000 2560
Special cases in stock valuation
1) Carriage Inwards
The cost of stock includes the purchases cost plus any other incidental cost incurred to bring
stock to their current or saleable state which includes insurance of goods in transit.

2) Returns
a) Sales Returns / Returns in words
Sales are issues to production recorded on the issue side of the stocks ledger and therefore
when returned should be recorded at the receipt side at the price issued.
b) Purchases Returns/ Return outwards

Purchases are recorded on the receipt side. The returns should be recorded on the issue
column at the price purchases.
3) Losses
Stock losses if identified after stock counts should be adjusted so that the a/c reflects the
actual quantity losses will be recorded on the issue column and valued consistently with the
method in use.
INVENTORY CONTROL PROCEDURES
Major Types of Inventory Control Systems

There are two broad of inventory control systems, the Reorder Level and the Periodic Review
systems. These systems are examined below but naturally many hybrid systems exist in practice
and many variants of the basic types will be found.
Reorder Level System.

This system is also known as the two-bin system. Its characteristics are as follows:
a) A predetermined re-order level is set for each item.
b) When the stock level falls to the re-order level, a replenishment order is issued.
c) The replenishment order quantity is invariably the EOQ.
d) The ‘two-bin’ system comes from the simplest method of operating the system whereby
the stock is segregated into two bins. Stock is initially drawn from the first bin and a
replenishment order issued when it becomes empty.
e) Most organizations operating the re-order level system maintain stock records with
calculated re-order levels which trigger off the required replenishment order.
Basic Terminology
Brief definitions of common inventory control terms are given below
a) Lead or procurement time. The period of time, expressed in days, weeks, months, etc.
between ordering (either externally or internally) and replenishment, i.e. when the goods are
available for use.
b) Demand. The amount required by sales, production, etc. Usually expressed as a rate of
demand per week, months or year. Estimates of the rate of demand during the lead time are
critical factors in inventory control systems.

c) Economic Ordering Quantity (EOQ) or Economic Batch Quantity (EBQ). This is a calculated
ordering quantity which minimizes the balance of cost between inventory holding costs and
reorder costs.
d) Physical stock. The number of items physically in stock at a given time.
e) Free stock. Physical stock plus outstanding replenishment orders minus unfulfilled
requirements.
f) Buffer Stock or Minimum Stock or Safety Stock. A stock allowance to cover errors in
forecasting the lead time or the demand during the lead time.
g) Maximum Stock. A stock level selected as the maximum desirable which is used as an
indicator to show when stocks have risen too high.
h) Recorder level. The level of stock at which a further replenishment order should be placed.
The reorder level is dependent upon the lead time and the demand during the lead time.
i) Reorder Quantity. The quantity of the replenishment order. In some types of inventory
control systems this is the EOQ, but in some other systems a different value is used.
A Simple Stock Situation Illustrated.

The figure below shows a stock situation simplified by the following assumptions: regular rates
of demand, a fixed lead time, and replenishment in one batch.
Slope indicates
AverageMaximum
Anticipated Rates
Reorder level of Demand
(700 units)
800 -
Reorder
700 -
Quantity
(usu. EOQ)
600 -
In this case
Stock level
500 - 600 units
400 -
300 -
200 -
100 - Safety Lead Time
stock (5 wks)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Time (in days or week etc)

Notes:
a) It will be seen from figure above that the safety stock in this illustration is needed to cope
with periods of maximum demand during the lead time.
b) The lead time as shown is 5 weeks, the safety stock 200 units, and the reorder quantity 600
units.
c) With constant rate of demand, as shown, the average stock is the safety stock plus ½ Reorder
quantity, for example, in figure above the average stock is:
200 + ½ (600) = 500 units.
Illustration
A simple manual reorder system illustrated.
The following data relate to a particular stock item.
Normal usage 110 per day
Minimum usage 50 per day
Maximum usage 140 per day
Lead time 25-30 days
EOQ (Previously calculated) 5000
Required;
Calculate various control levels
Solution
Using this data the various control levels can be calculated
Re-order Level = Maximum Usage ×Maximum Lead Time
= 140 × 3
= 4,200 units
Minimum Level = Re-order Level – Average Usage for Average Lead Time
= 4.200 – (110 × 27.5)
= 1,175 units
Maximum Level = Re-order Level + EOQ – Minimum Anticipated Usage in Lead

Time
= 4,200 + 5,000 – (50 ×25)
= 7,950 units

ECONOMIC ORDER QUANTITY (EOQ)
This is that quantity that is most economical to order. It is the quantity that minimizes the total
inventory cost of holding and ordering.
It is that size of an order that gives the maximum consumption.
It is obtaining and maintaining inventory at optimal levels.
NB: purchase cost is part of inventory cost. However under EOQ purchase price is assumed to be
constant irrespective of quantity ordered.
It is also assumed that the company will not experience stock out therefore the purchase cost and
stock-out will be ignored under EOQ
To be able to calculate a basic EOQ certain assumptions are necessary.

a) That there is a known, constant stockholding cost.
b) That there is a known, constant order cost.
c) That rates of demand are known and constant.
d) That there is a known, constant price per unit, i.e. there are no price discounts.
e) That replenishment is made instantaneously, i.e. the whole batch is delivered at once.
NOTE:
a) It will be apparent that the above assumptions are somewhat sweeping and they are good
reason for treating any EOQ calculation with caution.
b) The rationale of EOQ ignores buffer stocks which are maintained to cater for variations in
lead time and demand.
The EOQ Formula

It is possible, and more usual, to calculate the EOQ using a formula. The formula method gives
an exact answer, but do not be misled into placing undue reliance upon the precise figure. The
calculations are based on estimates of costs, demand, etc. which are, of course, subject to error.
The derivation of the EOQ formula is given below;-

Derivation of EOQ model
a) Graphic method
Total costs
Holding cost
TC Cost
Ordering cost
Q=EOQ Quantity (Q)
Total cost will be minimized when:-

Holding cost = ordinary cost
=
2
Q2 =
Therefore EOQ model = =
b) Calculus approach
Total cost = ordering cost + purchase costs + holding costs
TC = 0+ +
FOC = − = =0
1
=
2
.
Q2 =

=Q=
SOC = =
But D, Co, Q ≥ 0
Thus > 0 (+ve)
TC is minimized when
Q=
Illustration
A company uses 50,000 widgets per annum which are sh.10 each to purchase. The ordering and
handling costs are sh.150 per order and carrying costs are 15% of purchase price per annum, i.e.
it costs sh.1.50 p.a. to carry a widget in stock (sh.10 x 15%).
To graph the various costs involved the following steps are necessary:
Where
Total Costs per annum = Ordering Cost per annum + Carrying Cost per annum.
Where
Ordering cost per annum = No. of orders ×sh. 1.50
No. of orders =
(For example, if the order quantity was 5,000 widgets,
,
No. of orders = = 10
,
Ordering cost per annum = 10 ×sh150 = sh.1,500
And
Carrying cost per annum = average stock level × sh. 15
Average stock level =

(For example if the order quantity is 5,000)
,
Carrying costs p.a. = ×sh. 1.15 = sh. 3,750
Based on the above principles, the following table gives the cost for various order quantities.
Column I II III IV V VI
Order Average Annual Average Stock Holding Total Stock
Quantity No. of Ordering Cost Stock Cost p.a.
orders
p.a.
50000 Col. II x sh,150 Col. I Col. IV x £1.5 Cols III + V
Col. I Sh. 2 Sh. Sh.
1,000 50 50×150=7,500 1000/2=500 500×1.5=750 7500+7508,250

2,000 25 25×150=3,750 2000/2=1,000 1000×1.5=1,500 3750+1500=5,250
3,000 16 2/3 16 3000/2=1,500 1500×1.5=2,250 2500+2250=4,750
4,000 12 ½ 2/3×150=2,500 4000/2=2,000 2000×1.5=3,000 1875+3000=4,875
5,00 10 12 5000/2=2,500 2500×1.5=3,750 1500+3750=5,250
6,000 8 1/3 1/2×150=1,875 6000/2=3,000 3000×1.5=4,500 1250+4500=5,750
10×150=1,500
8
1/3×150=1,250
We have Co = sh. 150; D = 50,000 widgets; Cc = sh. 10 x 15% = sh. 1.50 per widget.
,
This gives EOQ =
.
= √10,000
= 3162 widgets.

Graphically
Table 1 Ordering and stock Holding Costs for various Order Quantities
The costs in Table 1 can be plotted in a graph and the approximate EOQ ascertained.
9000 -
8000 -
7000 -
6000 -
Total Cost
5000 - (Col VI)
costs
4000 - Stock Holding

cost (Col V)
3000 -
2000 -
1000 - Ordering cost
0-
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000
EOQ Order size
The figure above represents a Graph of data in the Table above

From the graph it will be seen that the EOQ is approximately 2,300 widgets, which means that
an average of slightly under 16 orders will have to be placed a year.
Notes:
a) From a graph closer accuracy is not possible and is unnecessary anyway.
b) It will be seen from the graph that the bottom of the total cost curve is relatively flat,
indicating that the exact value of the EOQ is not too critical.
Illustration
A company had annual demand of 800,000 units the purchase per unit is 80 while the cost of
pressing are order is Sh.4,000. The annual inventory holding cost is 5% of the inventory value.
Currently the company has been purchasing 20000 units time, they place an order.
Required;
i) Calculate the total cost of current inventory policy
ii) Calculate the EOQ
iii) Calculate the cost savings if the company adopts EOQ policy

Solution
i) Total inventory cost = ordering cost + purchasing + holding cost for stocks out cost.
D Q
TC  Co  DC  ch  stockout cos t
Q 2
 800,000   80,000 
 x 4000   x5% x80  800,000x80
 80,000   2 
= 40,000 + 160,000 + 64,000,000 = 64,200,000
2 Dco 2 x800,000 x 400

EQQ    40 ,000 units
ch 4
ii) Cost selling = Total Cost using – Total Cost using

Current policy EOQ
 800,000 x 4000   40,000 

T .C     800,000 x80   x5% x100 
 40,000   2 
 64 ,160 ,000
Cost saving = 64,200,000 – 64,160,000
= Sh40,000
Economic Order Quantity in the Presence of Discounts
A company may qualify for quantity discounts if it purchases stock items in bulk. This will have
an effect of rendering the effective purchase cost.
In determining whether the company should take advantage of quantity discount we compare the
total cost of using the E.O.Q without discount and the total cost after taking the advantage of
discount.
A particularly unrealistic assumption with the basic EOQ calculation is that the price per item
remains constant. Usually some form of discount can be obtained by ordering increased
quantities. Such price-discounts can be incorporated into the EOQ formula, but it becomes much
more complicated. A simpler approach is to consider the costs associated with the normal EOQ
and compare these costs with the costs at each succeeding discount point and so ascertain the
best quantity to order.

Steps
1. Compute EOQ without discounts and hence use the EOQ to compute total costs.
2. Using the discounted purchase cost and more stock to qualify for it compute the total cost
(C.
3. Compare the Total Cost in step 1 or 2 and make recommendations
Financial Effects of Discounts

Price discounts for quantity purchases have three financial effects, two of which are beneficial
and one adverse.
a) Lower price item.
b) The larger order quantity means that fewer orders need to be placed so that ordering costs are
reduced.
Adverse Effects
a) Increased costs arise from the extra stockholding costs caused by the average stock level
being higher due to the larger order quantity.
Illustration
EOQ with Discounts

A company buys 400 units of an item at the cost of Sh. 5000 at unit at an ordering cost of Sh
2000 at order. The carrying cost has been determined to be 20% of the costs of average cost. The
company then received 2% discount offer for purchases of 100 or more unit.
Required;
Step I
Determine the best inventory for these items.
√2Dco
=
Ch
20
ℎ = x 5000 = 1000
100
√2 x 400 x 2000
. . = = 40 Units
1000
. = + 2 + ℎ
2

400 40 1000
2000 + (400 5000) + = 2,040,000
40 2
Step II
Taking the discount

C = 0.9 ×5000 = 4900
Ch = 0.2 ×4900 = 980
Q = 100 units
Co = 2000
. = + +
2
400 100 × 980

. = × 2000 + (400 × 49000) + = 2,017,000
100 2
Step III
Recommendation – The Company should take advantage of the discount.
Illustration
Bora Supermarket carries on its operation in Nakuru Town. On annual basis, it orders 480,000
pens from a Nairobi based distributor. A packet of twenty four pens delivered to Bora’s
warehouse costs Sh.480 including transport charges. The supermarket borrows money from BCD
Bank at an interest rate of 10% per annum to finance its inventories.
The supermarket also incurs Sh.1,500 to place an order for the pens and Sh.8 carrying costs for
each pen
Required:
i) Economic order quantity (EOQ) for the pens.
ii) Total costs at the economic order quantity.
iii) For orders of 72,000 pens and above, the distributor has offered a discount rate of 10% on
the delivery price
Advise the management of the supermarket on whether to take advantage of the discount offer.

Solution
i) D = 480,000 pens
C= = 20
Co = 1500
Ch.= 8 + (10% x 20) = Sh. 10
√2Dco
=
Ch
2 × 480,000 × 1500
. . = = 1,200 Units
10
Total cost. = Purchase cost. + Ordering cost. + Holding cost
ii) Total cost = Purchase Cost + Ordering Cost + Holding Cost
480,000 1200 × 10
E.O.Q= 48,000 × 20 + × 1,500 +
12 2
= Sh 9,720,000
iii) Advice to the management
P = 0.9 ×20 = 18
D = 480,000
C = 18
Q = 7,200
Ch. = 8 + (10% x 18) = 9.8
480,000 480,000 72,000 9.8

= 18 + 1500 + = 9,002,800
100 72 2
Difference= sh.9,720.000 – 9,002,800=sh.717,200
The company should take advantage of the discount because is more economical

Safety Stock and Re-Order Levels
So far it has been assumed that the demand and the lead time have been known with certainty. In
such circumstances the re-order level is the rate of demand times the lead time.
This means that regardless of the length of the lead time or of the rate of demand no buffer stock
is necessary when there are conditions of certainty.
This results in a stock profile as follows:
Reorder Level
Stock Level
Lead Time Time
Re-order level in conditions of certainty (no safety stock)

It will be seen from the graph above that, in conditions of certainty, the re-order level can be set
so that stock just reaches zero and is then replenished. When demand and/or lead time vary, the
re-order level must be se so that, on average, some safety stock is available to absorb variations
in demand and/or lead time. In such circumstances the re-order level calculation can be
conveniently considered in two parts:
a) The normal or average rate of usage times the normal or average lead time (i.e. as the re-
order level calculation in conditions of certainty) Plus.
b) The safety stock.
Safety Stock Calculation by Cost Tabulation

The amount of safety stock is the level where the total costs associated with safety stock are at a
minimum. That is, where the safety stock holding plus the stock-out cost is lowest. (It will be
noted that this is a similar cost situation to that previously described in the EOQ derivation). The
appropriate calculations are given below based on the following illustration.
Illustration
An electrical company uses a particular type of thermostat which costs £5. The demand averages
800 p. a. and the EOQ has been calculated at 200. Holding costs are 20% p.a. and stock out costs

have been estimated at sh.2 per item that is unavailable. Demand and lead times vary, but
fortunately the company has kept records of usage over 50 lead times as follows:
(a) (b) (c)

Usage in lead time Number of times Recorded Probability
25-29 units 1 .02
30-34 units 8 .16
35-39 units 10 .20
40-44 units 12 .24
45-49 units 9 .18
50-54 units 5 .10
55-59 units 5 .10
Total 50 1.00
From the above the re-order level and safety stock should be calculated
Solution
Using the mid- point of each group calculate the average usage in the lead time.
x t tx
27 1 27
32 8 256
37 10 370
42 12 504
47 9 423
52 5 260
57 5 285
50 2,125
Average usage = = 42.5
ECONOMIC BATCH QUANTITY (EBQ)
This is a model for manufacturing firms which produces component for use in the production of
a finished product.
The production technology is such that the production rate of the component is higher than the
usage rate. The balance of stock at the end of each day is put in storage facilities and it assumed
to the max. Stock level at the end of the production
The components are these produced in batches. Production stop for some time then started again
hence forth.
EBQ is the quantity to be produced per production run in order to minimize total cost model
policy variables include:-

i) Economic batch quantity
ii) Length of production run
iii) Max stock level
iv) Length of the break between production runs
v) Reorder level
vi) Associated costs including
vii) Variable cost of production
viii) Holding cost of inventory items
ix) Set-up costs i.e. cost of mobilizing production resources e.g. order of Rm.
Derivation of EBQ
Let R = set up costs per set up
S = Set up cost per set up
C = variable production cost per unit

Ch= Holding cost per unit per annum
i = Holding cost as a percentage of variable production costs per units
Ch = Ci
Q = economic batch quantity
P = production rate in units per day or any other period
U = usage rate in units per day or any other period
d = Length of production run in days or any other period
B = Length of the break between production runs
Then:
TC = Total variable production costs + set up costs + holding costs
TC = RC + + Average inventory x Cl
But average inventory =

Maximum stock level = (P-U)d2
d = Q/P
Therefore maximum stock level = ( − ) 1−
Therefore average inventory =

TC = RC + = 1−
FOC = + 1− =0
= 1− =
Q2 =
EBQ =
Illustration
ABC Ltd manufactures components X for use in an assembly the usage rate of the component is
lower than the production rate.
The following data has been used for the components.
Production rate = 4000 Units per day
Usage rate = 1200 unit
Inventory holding cases = Sh. 20 @ unit @ annum
Unit variable production costs = Sh. 2000
Set-up cost = Sh. 110,000
Acquisition lead time = 10 Working days
Days in a year = 250 working days
Required;-
Formulate the best inventory policy for component X
Solution
Inventory Policy
, ,
1) EBQ = = = Sh 68,660.65 Units
2) Length of production run

,
d= = = 17 days
3) Max. stock level = (p-u) d

(4,000 – 12,000) 7

436,000 Units
,
4) Length of break = = = 29
,
5) Re-order level = Usage during lead time

= Usage rate × lead time
= 1,200 ×10
= 12,000 Units
6) Total costs = Set-up cost + Production cost + Holding cost

= + + 1−
2
68,660 1,200
= (300,000 110) + (20 × ) + 20 1 −
2 4,000
=Sh33,686,614
Assumption of EBQ
1) The annual requirements are assumed to be constant.

2) The variable production cost are assumed to be constant
3) The holding cost are assumed to be constant
4) The usage rate in units per day and the production rate in units per day to be constant.
5) They are assumed to be no stock out hence no stock out cost
BACK FLUSH
Back-flush accounting is a costing short-cut. It relies on businesses having immaterial amounts

of work-in-progress and it is therefore particularly suitable for businesses operating just-in-time
inventory management. If the amount of work-in-progress is negligible, what is the point in
meticulously valuing it? Fretting that some products might be 25% complete and others 60%
complete, and then adding carefully calculated labour and overheads to these (immaterial) items
is a complete waste of time and effort. That type of accounting is perhaps the modern-day
equivalent of alleged ancient arguments about how many angels could dance on the point of a
needle.

In back-flush accounting costs are not associated with units until they are completed or sold.
Back-flush accounting is sometimes called delayed costing, which is a helpful name, as costs are
not allocated to production until after events have occurred.
Standard costs are then used to work backwards to flush out manufacturing costs into production,
splitting them between stocks of finished goods (if any) and cost of sales. No costs, whether
material or conversion costs, are allocated to work-in-progress.
Basically, back flush accounting is when you wait until the manufacture of a product has been
completed, and then record all of the related issuances of inventory from stock that were required
to create the product. This approach has the advantage of avoiding all manual assignments of
costs to products during the various production stages, thereby eliminating a large number of
transactions and the associated clerical labor.
Back flush accounting is entirely automated, with a computer handling all transactions. The back
flushing formula is:
Number of units produced × unit count listed in the bill of materials for each component
= Number of raw material units removed from stock
Backflushing is a theoretically elegant solution to the complexities of assigning costs to products

and relieving inventory, but it is difficult to implement. Backflush accounting is subject to the
following problems:
 Requires an accurate production count. The number of finished goods produced is the
multiplier in the backflush equation, so an incorrect count will relieve an incorrect amount
of components and raw materials from stock.
 Requires an accurate bill of materials. The bill of materials contains a complete itemization
of the components and raw materials used to construct a product. If the items in the bill are
inaccurate, the backflush equation will relieve an incorrect amount of components and raw
materials from stock.
 Requires excellent scrap reporting. There will inevitably be unusual amounts of scrap or
rework in a production process that are not anticipated in a bill of materials. If you do not
separately delete these items from inventory, they will remain in the inventory records, since
the backflush equation does not account for them.
 Requires a fast production cycle time. Backflushing does not remove items from inventory
until after a product has been completed, so the inventory records will remain incomplete
until such time as the backflushing occurs. Thus, a very rapid production cycle time is the
best way to keep this interval as short as possible. Under a backflushing system, there is no
recorded amount of work-in-process inventory.
Back flushing is not suitable for long production processes, since it takes too long for the
inventory records to be reduced after the eventual completion of products. It is also not suitable

for the production of customized products, since this would require the creation of a unique bill
of materials for each item produced.
The cautions raised here do not mean that it is impossible to use backflush accounting. Usually, a
manufacturing planning system allows you to use backflush accounting for just certain products,
so you can run it on a compartmentalized basis. This is useful not just to pilot test the concept,
but also to use it only under those circumstances where it is most likely to succeed. Thus,
backflush accounting can be incorporated into a hybrid system in which multiple methods of
production accounting may be used.
ACCOUNTING FOR LABOUR
Labour costing
Entails analysis of labour related costs, labour remuneration, and recording of labour costs to
products
It entails an analysis of the cost of purchasing labour hours and employees services rendered to
an organisation and other cost related to labour. Categories include:-
i. Direct labour
ii. Indirect labour
Direct labour
Refers to employees engaged in the production process and are the ones who make the products.
Their cost form part of direct cost of production e.g. machine operators in a factory etc.
Indirect labour
Refers to employees not engaged in direct production, they support the process. Their costs do
not form part of labour cost of production and treated as production overhead e.g. indirect
employees in the office.
Labour related costs

It may not include actual pay but also other indirect cost related to the organization labour cost
includes:-
1) Cost of labour turnover
2) Cost of idle time
3) Cost of fraud in payroll.

WAGES ALLOCATION
Gross rate represents the total pay to an employee however the entire amount paid to direct
workers is to be part of costs for part of product cost purposes because some elements of gross
rate will be treated as labour costs. The elements have been discussed below;-
1. Basic wage
Basic wages is the amount contracted for. There are various methods by which basic wages can
be paid out.
They include
(a) Fixed rate or fixed salary per month or per annum
Here, the employees earn a fixed amount despite the amount of work done. For instance, a
production manager may be allowed a salary of Shs500,000 per month, whether the company
production is at peak or off-peak.
(b) Piece rate or piece work
Under this method, the earnings depend on the level of activity or output achieved and it is
expressed as Earnings = Output (units) x basic rate per unit
Under the piece rate system, there are three schemes of remuneration. These are straight piece
rate, straight piece rate with a guaranteed minimum pay and a differential piece rate.
i) Differential piece rate
ii) Straight piece rate with a guaranteed minimum pay
iii) Straight piece rate
i) Straight piece rate

Here, the basic rate per unit remains constant irrespective of the number of units
produced. For instance, if 200 units are produced at a basic rate of Shs1000 per units,
then the earnings will be
= Shs.1,000 per unit x 200 units
= Shs.200,000
ii) Straight piece rate with a guaranteed minimum pay

Under this scheme, although the employee is paid on the number of units produced, one
is guaranteed of some main wage since there are occasions when production does not take
place due to power failures, machine breakdowns, etc. Therefore, a standard rate is
agreed upon for the production of each unit based upon an expected time to produce one
unit and the normal rate per hour.
iii) Differential piece rate

Here, employees’ basic rate of pay per unit changed as the level of activity changes.
Under differential rate system, the workers time rate is fixed at a higher level than the

usual rate of payment if the output exceeds the expected (usually set) level. The objective
of this system is to provide an incentive to the workers while retaining the simplicity of
the system. It is mostappropriate for easily measurable output to which groups of workers
contribute e.g. car assembly lines. The low piece rate is applicable where a worker is not
able to achieve the standard (normal) output and the highest piece rate is for those above
standard. It does not provide the security of a guaranteed minimum wage but has the
enhanced incentive of increased rates for higher production.
If it does not guarantee minimum wages on time basis, this may lead to high wage
differential in the company and consequently demotivation. For this reason, the
differential price rate system as well as many variations of the piece rate system contains
a minimum (guaranteed) pay.
(c) Time rate or time work

Under this method, employees earnings depend on the time spent on the job. Total wages
can be expressed as;
Total earnings = Basic rate per hour × total hours worked
Under this system there are various schemes that may be applied. They include
Flat time rate

Under flat time rate, each worker is paid for the time spent without considering the volume of
production during that period. The basic rate per hour remains constant irrespective of the
number of hours worked. For instance, assume that an employee worked for 200 hours on a
specific assignment. Assume further that the basic rate per hour is Shs100. The total earnings
under flat time rate will be
= Shs100 per hour x 200 hours
= Shs20,000
LABOUR COSTS
Measured day rate
This is where although the employee is paid on the basis of the number of hours worked,
before such payment is made, one must have completed a given piece of assignment.
Graduated time rate

Under this scheme, the rate of pay is adjusted to reflect changes in the cost of living
2. Time keeping
A labour cost control routine should ensure that payments are paid only to employees who have
spent time at the work place and that payments are at agreed rates of pay including overtime
premium and shift premium payments where relevant. Where an employee is paid a fixed sum
for an agreed length of working week, it may be decided by a check by the supervisor that the
employee is at work is all that is necessary.

Where the employee is being paid at the rate per hour for the time spent at work together with
premium rates for overtime work, it is likely that a detailed record of time spent on the premises
is required. This is done by having the employee to register his arrival and departure times.
3. Time analysis
This is usually achieved by having the employee complete a daily or weekly timesheet or by
having job cards or piecework tickets. Where time sheets are issued, the employee records the
time analysis stating how much time was spent on each job and recording idle time. This sheet
will then be authorized by the supervisor. Job cards move with a job as it passes from one
employee to another.
There may be time clocks at each work center where the time spent on the job is recorded.
Where this routine is used, employees may also be required to clock idle time on an idle time
card, which will be analyzed to determine the cause of idle time. Where payments are made in
return for output units, piecework tickets may be completed which are signed by the supervisor
certifying the number of units claimed. The analysis of employee time will facilitate:
 Correct charge of direct labour cost to each job
 Correct charge of indirect labour cost to cost centers
 Control of labour costs by job and cost center
 Calculation of employee bonus
 Measurement of efficiency
4. Improvement in the differential piece rate system

An improvement of the high day rate system is the measured day work system. This system
attempts to grade workers according to their efficiency and pay them a fixed amount based on
which bracket they fall. For example, a company may have the following efficiency brackets
paid at the respective rates.
Efficiency Bracket Fixed rate
90% to 95% Shs.50,000 per month
96% to 100% Shs.60,000 per month
101% to 105% Shs.70,000 per month
Suppose a worker falls in the 96% to 100% bracket, the actual amount of wages to be paid to him
is Shs.60,000. The challenge here is that some employees may be more or less efficient than
graded. Does the company still pay them the same amount as indicated in the efficiencytable?
This calls for a consistent review of the employees’ efficiency and remuneration scheme.
Where, for instance, an employee has performed more efficiently, the company may pay an
excess amount based on the evaluation. Assuming the employee in the same bracket as
aboveachieves 104% efficiency, the company may decide to pay him/her the basic amount plus
an extra amount based on evaluationi.e

= Shs.60,000 + ×(70,000 - 60,000)
= Shs.60,000 + ×10,000
= Shs.60,000 + 8,000
= Shs.68,000
Illustration
Patanisho Quarry Ltd remunerates its casual workers based on each day’s work. Workers are
graded into various efficiency bands after training and then paid a fixed sum according to
efficiency bands as follows.
Efficiency band Wage rate per week

% Sh.
81-90 800
91-100 900
101-110 1,000
111-120 1,100
Additional information;
1. Workers are guaranteed of their fixed pay within their efficiency bands irrespective of the
output achieved.
2. A wage rate of Sh. 700 per week is paid for efficiency levels below 81%.
3. Any excess units of production beyond the upper efficiency band limit are paid at Sh. 5 per
unit.
4. A 100% efficiency level repressing 1,200 units per week.
5. The data for a four-week period for three workers in a given time was as follows:
Weeks
Worker Efficiency band 1 2 3 4
% Units Units Units Units
1 81-90 1,210 860 1,280 1,330
2 101-110 1,220 1,240 1,190 1,250
3 11-120 1,500 1,540 1,390 1,460
Required;
Total earnings for each of the three workers for the four-week period

Solution
Patanisho Quarry Ltd
Total earnings for each of the three workers for four week period
Efficiency band Wage rate Per Expected Units to be
% week produced
Sh Sh
≤ 81 700 1,200 960
× 80
100
81-90 800 1,080
1,200
× 90
100
91 – 100 900 1,200
1,200
× 100
100
101 – 110 1,000 1,320
1,200
× 110
111 – 120 1,100 100 1,440
1,200
× 80
100
2)
Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Total
Bonus Bonus Bonus Bonus
W1 81-90 1,210-1,080 = - 1,280- 1,330 – 1,080
130 - 1,080 250 × 5
130×5 - 200 ×5 1,250 3,900
W2: 101 - 650 0 1,000 0
110 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 1,540- 0 1,460-1,440
W3: 111-120 1,500 – 1,440 1,440 - 20×5
60×5 100×5 - 100 900
300 500 -
Total earnings = Basic Wage + Bonus
Worker 1 = [(800 x 3) + 700] + 3,900 = shs .6, 000
Worker 2 = (1,000 x 3) + 900 = shs. 3,900
Worker 3 = (1,100 x 4) + 900 = shs .5,300
5. Overtime Premium
This is the compensation paid to employees in addition to normal wages for hours worked in
excess of normal working hours. The overtime is that time paid for over and above the basic

hours for the period. Overtime premium is the difference between the rate at which normal
working hours are paid and the rate at which overtime hours are paid.
The overtime premium treatment depends on the cause of overtime.

a) If it is normal to work overtime due to general increase in production overtime premium is
treated as indirect wage and charged to production. This will help ensure that units completed
during normal time units completed during overtime carry the same unit cost.
b) If overtime is as a result of customer’s request it should be charged to the customer i.e.
overtime premium will be treated as part of wages for units produced by the customers.
NB: Overtime cost by abnormal conditions e.g. shortage of materials, machine breakdown is at
premium should be expensed transferred to P& L statement
6. Shift Premium
Additional amount paid to an employee for working in a different shift i.e. working night shift
instead of day shift.
It is treated as indirect wage and transferred to over debt cost.
7. Idle time Premium

Idle time is non-predictive time paid for i.e. workers are paid but no goods have been produced
e.g. when there is machine breakdown, power failure or tea breaks. Idle time can either be
avoidable or unavoidable. It could be due to production disruptions whereby there is machine
breakdown, inefficient scheduling of jobs or shortage of raw materials or policy decisions i.e.
changes in production specifications or retraining skills.
Labour costs for paying for hours of avoidable time are costs that simply should not have
occurred.
Therefore, they should be written off in the profit and loss account.
Unavoidable idle time is that which cannot be helped. It is uncontrollable or unnecessary cost to
the business e.g. tea breaks, unexpected fall in demand for a product or a strike at the suppliers
affecting vital supplies. Unavoidable idle time of direct workers may be included in the cost of
products as a production overhead. All other idle time is treated as period costs.
Idle time ratio = Idle time × 100

Total hours worked
PAY OF INDIRECT WORK

Represents pay for hours worked on other jobs. The amount should be treated as an indirect
wage for the job in consideration. It should be charged as a job or a/c for in as an O/H cost.

An incentive paid to employee to recognize the employees’ efforts during production. For
individual bonus, it will be a/c as part of direct wages since it can be identified as an effort for
particular job.
For group bonus the bonus is treated as an indirect wage cost since individual efforts cannot be
identified and also amount is paid to the entire group.
Indirect workers’ pay

Pay to indirect workers e.g. cleaners, supervisors should be treated as indirect wage. However if
they happen to participate in production the pay for time at production will be treated as direct
wage.
Illustration
Zawadi Ltd is a small company which manufactures a range of plastic commodities.
In order to manufacture a lunch box, the following five manual processes are required:
Process Time required per lunch Wage rate per hour(sh.)
box
1 Minutes 65
2 15 50
3 25 40
4 10 35
5 30 30
20
The weekly production target is 7,200 lunch boxes packed in cartons each containing twelve
lunch boxes.
The company’s working week has 40 hours.
Required;-
1. Number of casual workers required for each of the processes
2. Labour cost incurred per week to manufacture 7,200 lunch boxes.
Solution
(i) Number of casual workers required for each processes.
1. 15 × 7200 = 108000 Min = 1800hrs
60
= 45 workers
2. 25 × 7200 = 180,000 = 3000 hrs.

= 3000 = 75 workers
40

3. 10×7200 = 72000 = 1200 hrs.
60
=1200hrs
40 = 30 workers
4. 30 ×7200 = 21600 min – 3600 hrs.

60
= 3600
40 = 90 workers
5. 20 ×7200 = 144000 Min – 2400 hrs.

60
2400 Hrs
40= 60 workers
ii) Labour cost

Process = 1800 x 65 = 11700
3000 x 50 = 150000
1200 x 40 = 48000
3600 x 35 = 12600
2400 x 30 = 70,000
Total labour cost = 513000
C Hrs. Normal Std. Time Time.

Over
Employee Worked Time Time Taken Saved
Time 63 45 18
Moraa 45 42 3 51 39 12
Mogaka 42 42 -
i) Basic Pay = Time worked x Rate/hrs.

Moraa = 42×400 = 16,800
Mogaka = 42 ×400 = 16800
ii) Overtime pay = Overtime x Overtime rate/hr
Moraa = 3 × 400 × 1 1/3 = 1600
iii) Bonus = Time saved x Rate x Hr x 50%

Moraa = 18 × 400 × 50% = 3600
Mogaka = 12 × 400 ×50% = 2400

iv) Gross wages = Basic pay + Overtime pay + Bonus
Moraa = 16,800 + 1600 + 3600 = 22,000
Mogaka = 16,800 + 2400 + 0 = 19200
v) Cost per flower pot moulded

Moraa: Basic 42 x 400 = 168000
Bonus = 3600
20400
Units produced = 189 – 6 = 183
Cost per unit = Total direct wages = 20,400
Output units 183
= sh.111.50 per unit
Mogaka Basic = 39 ×400 = 15,600
Bonus 2,400
18,000
Units paid = 204 – 4 = 200
Cost per day = 18,000

200
= Sh. 90/unit
LABOUR TURNOVER
It is the number of employees leaving or being recruited in a period of time. It is expressed as a
percentage of the total labour force. It is expressed as;
Labour turnover = Replacement ×100

Average no. of employees in a period
Causes of labour turnover; these causes outline the reasons why an employee may leave an
organization. They include
 Illness and accidents
 Retirement and death
 Rate of payment; the employee may find that the remuneration is not commensurate tothe
amount of work done
 Poor working relationship between the management and the employee
 Lack of opportunity for career or lack of job satisfaction

Costs of labour turnover
Costs of labour turnover can be broadly categorized into replacement costs and preventive costs.
Replacement costsare costs incurred as a result of hiring a new employee. They include cost of
selection and placement (advertising and interviewing), inefficiencies in new labour, lower
productivity, cost of training, loss of output due to delay in new labour becoming available,
increased wastage and spoilage due to lack of expertise among the new staff, possibility of more
frequent accidents, cost of tools and machine breakages.
Preventive costsare costs incurred in order to prevent employees from leaving an organization.
They include cost of personnel administration in maintaining good relationships and cost of
welfare, services and pension schemes.
INCENTIVE SCHEMES
Employees do not put extra efforts if there is no reward for their efforts. Employers reward
workers in a direct proportion to work accomplished.
In these schemes, workers can earn more if they produce more out and therefore get incentives to
make them produce more.
Grouped into the following categories
1) Direct financial plans
2) Indirect financial plans
3) Plans other than financial
1) Direct financial plans

Are schemes whose compensation is in direct proportion to output efforts.
Compensation of a worker is determined either individually or in a group.
A scheme whose compensation is based on individual performance is known as individual
incentive scheme and where it is made with reference to a group working together is known as
group incentive scheme.
Individual /Premium Bonus Scheme
Are schemes based on individual efforts and thus they provide greater incentive to an individual
effort when compared to group schemes.
The higher the effort, the higher the incentive
It is easier to measure performance since work is individual based. Schemes include:-
Rowan scheme
a) DavidRowan of Glasgow (U.S.A) introduced the scheme, under which time wage is
guaranteed as in the case of Halsey scheme. For the performance of a job, standard time is
fixed; otherwise operation or task is exactly in the same manner as in the case of Halsey
scheme. For the hours of his actual work, the worker gets his time wage; on this point also it

doesn’t differ from the Halsey scheme. The bonus of the worker, who is able to finish the job
in less than the allowed time, is equal to his time wage for that proportion of the time taken
as the saved time bears to the time allowed. In other words, the ratio between the bonus & the
time saved is equal to the ratio between the time taken & the time allowed.
i.e., Bonus Hours = Time Taken

Time Saved Time Allowed
Or Bonus hours: Time Saved:: Time Taken: Time Allowed
Advantages
a) Because the premium is proportionate to the time saved, if the rate has been wrongly fixed,
the effect will be less serious. So Rowan scheme is safer than the Halsey scheme, as far as
the point of view of employer is concerned.
b) The worker is in the most advantageous position when 50% of the time allowed is saved by
him, because otherwise his earning per hour will increase at a diminishing rate, if any more
time is saved by him. As a result, the chances of wastage, defectives, breakdown etc. will be
less as there is a limit to speed.
c) Fixed overhead per unit will be lower as a result of higher output.
d) Since both the employer & the employee enjoys the time saved; though proportion is not the
same as in the case of the Halsey scheme, to some extent labour cost also diminishes.
e) Better wage is earned by the employees; their improvement in efficiency is rewarded.
Disadvantages
a) The workers do not like the idea of sharing the savings by both employer & employee, since
the time is saved by the workers.The bonus hours will not exceed the 25% of the time
allowed in any case.
b) Apart from workers efficiency, saving of time depends upon standard of tools, materials &
implements & also upon the working conditions. No useful purpose will be served unless the
best of these are assured.
Purpose of Rowan Premium Bonus Scheme:

 An incentive scheme to reward direct labor for saving time during the production process
 This method rewards the production worker with a proportion of the time saved
Illustration
Mr. A is being paid sh.9 per hour. The time allowed to complete a task is 12 hours. The actual
time taken by Mr. A to complete the task is only 8 hours

Required;
Compute the gross pay of Mr. A after completing the task.
Solution
Mr. A’s gross pay
= (8 hours × sh.9) + (Time taken/Time allowed ×Time saved ×Rate per hour)
= (8 hours×sh.9) + (67% × 4 hours × sh.9)
= sh.96.12
A = Time Wages – 7875

Bonus = 7875
B. Time wages – 8640
Bonus – 3/50 x 8640 = 345.6
C = 50 × 185 = 9250
Bonus 2/60 x 9250 = 308.33
Halsey bonus scheme (50/50)

F.A. Halsey of the U.S.A. introduced this scheme.
Under this scheme, for performing a job, operation or task, a standard time is specified.
The hourly rate is fixed & the workers are guaranteed so that even if, within the standard time
specified, the job is not completed by them, guaranteed time rate may be received by them.
The worker becomes entitled to bonus, if he is in a position to complete the job in less than the
specified time; bonus being equal to his time wage for 50% of the time saved in addition to the
time wage which he is entitled for the actual time worked.
The total earning is obtained by multiplying the sum of time allowed & time taken by half the
hourly rate.
Advantages:
a) The scheme & the calculation of the remuneration are easily understandable by the worker.
b) As time wage is guaranteed, penalty is not imposed on the slow workers; whereas rewards
are provided to the slow workers for their efficiency.
c) The workers are encouraged to save as much time as possible due to the bonus, because for
the higher time saved bonus will be higher.
d) Employers are enabled to obtain more output from the workers under the scheme, & as a
result of that, per unit fixed overhead get diminished.

Disadvantages:
a) Since the employers & employees share the savings in time, this may not be liked by many
employees’ organizations & they argue that the workers should get the entire benefits as the
savings is done by them.
b) Compared to the other incentive plans, the workers are being offered less incentives under
this scheme.
c) Apart from the workers, savings in time also depends upon the tool’s standards, materials,
and machinery & working conditions. So the desired result cannot be expected unless the
best of these are assured.
d) Chances of more spoilage, wastage, defectives & breakdown of machinery are there under
this scheme, as for the purpose of maximizing the bonus, the workers will try to save as
much time as possible. As a result, greater supervision cost has to be involved.
ILLUSTRATION
Employees Adam Smith and John are each assigned a job and they each take 3, 2.5 and 2 hours
respectively to complete the job. The time rate is sh.40 per hour and the time allowed for each
job is 3 hours.
Required
a) Using the Halsey plan calculate the total earnings of each employee
b) Calculate the effective hourly rate of pay
Solution
a)
Adam Smith John
Time allowed 3 3 3
Time taken 3 2.5 2
Time saved - 0.5 1
Total earnings = 50% × Time saved × Time taken

Adams = (50% × 0) + 3 × 40 = 120
Smith = (50% × 0.5 × 40) + 2.5 × 40 = 110
Johns = (50% × 1 × 40) + (2× 40) = 100
b) Effective hourly rate of pay

Adams =120= sh.40
3
Smith = 110=sh.44
2.5
Johns = 100=sh.50
2

Halsey weir (33 1/3)
Under the Halsey-Weir scheme, a worker is entitled to bonus which is equal to his time wage for
331/3% (often 30%) of the time saved; instead of 50% in case of the Halsey scheme. Thus except
the above, there is no difference between the Halsey scheme & the Halsey-Weir scheme.
Illustration
Calculate the total earnings of a worker & the effectively rate of labour wages per hour where
payment of bonus is under (a) the Halsey (50%) scheme & (b) the Rowan scheme from the
below mentioned particulars:
Basic wage rate per hour – shs.10.80, Time allowed for the job – 48 hours, Actual time taken –
36 hours.
Solution
(a) Under Halsey (50%) Scheme
Total wages = Normal time wage + 50% of (time saved×time rate)
Shs.
Normal time wage = 36 hours @ shs.10.80 = 388.80
Bonus = 50% of (Time saved×time rate) = 50% (12×10.80) 64.80
Total Wages 453.60
Effective hourly rate = shs. 453.60/36 = shs.12.60
Alternatively
Total wages = (Time taken+50% of time saved) ×time rate
= (36 hours+50% of 12) × shs.10.80 = shs.453.60
(b) Under Rowan Scheme:

Total wages = Normal time wage + Time saved ×Time taken×Time rate
Time allowed
Shs.
Normal time wage 36 hours @ Shs.10.80 388.80
Bonus =Time saved ×(Time taken×Time rate)
Time allowed
97.20
= 12×(36×10.80) 486.00
48
Effective hourly rate = shs.486.00/36 = shs. 13.50

Alternatively;
Bonus as a percentage of Time rate = (Time saved/Time allowed)×100
= (12/48)×100 = 25%
Bonus = 25% of shs.10.80 = shs. 2.70
Bonus as a fraction of time rate = (Time saved/Time allowed)×Time rate

= (12/48)×10.80 = shs.2.70
Effective hourly rate for time taken = shs.10.80+shs.2.70 = shs.13.50

Total Wages = 36 hours×shs.13.50 = shs.486
Illustration
40 hours is taken by a worker to do job for which time allowed is 50 hours. $. 1.25 per hour is
his daily rate. Calculate the works cost of the job under the following methods of payment of
wages:
(i) Time rate; (ii) Piece rate; (iii) Halsey plan &(iv) Rowan plan.
Additional information: (i) Material cost $.60; (ii) Factory overhead 125% of wages
Solution: Calculation of wages under different methods:
i) Time Rate: Wages for 40 hours (actual time taken) @ shs. 1.25 = 50.00
ii) Piece Rate:Wages for 50 hours (time allowed for the job) @ shs. 1.25 = 62.50
iii) Halsey Plan:Normal time wage = 40 hours @ shs.1.25 = 50.00
Bonus=50% of (Time saved× Time rate) =50% of (10×1.25) = 6.25
Shs.56.25
iv) Rowan Plan:Normal time wage = 40 hours @ shs.1.25 = 50.00

Bonus= Time saved/Time allowed×(Time taken× Time rate)
=10/50×(40×1.25) = 10.00
Shs. 60.00
Grant bonus scheme

In these schemes, employers are rewarded on the basis of efforts applied.
In differential piece work system effort is met by use of graduated rate of payment per unit.
Higher attract higher rates per unit. The other schemes are based on time and their incentive is a
share of gains based on employer efforts. The incentive in the aggregate proportion from
financial gain of employees effort arising as a result of reduced time on production. Each job or
work issued has its own time set and if the employees work for less time he sales on standard
time.

The financial adv. from time saved is shared between employee and employer based on agreed
proportion.
Incentive = Agreed proportion of time saved x Rate per hour

Time saved = Standard time – Actual time worked.
Group Bonus Scheme

Where individual schemes are not applicable group bonus schemes may be applied, these
schemes are appropriate where production is done by a group of employees working together as
a team e.g. construction of motor vehicle assembly.
It is difficult to measure individual performance and bonus will be paid to the group. It would be
shared equitably by members of the group e.g. it can be shared in proportion to their wage level
or time taken by employees on the job.
Group wages are treated as indirect wages.
Illustration
A factory issues a job to two employees, Mark and Markus, paid at the rate of sh.210/hr. and
sh220/hr. respectively. Mark is issued with 400 containers and it takes twelve minutes to produce
each. Markus is issued with 240 containers and it takes nine minutes to produce e ach
For every hour saved a bonus is paid at the rate of 60% of bonus rat3e which is sh240/hr. The
factory works 42 hours week and overtime and overtime is paid at the rate of time and one third.
At the end of the week Mark band Markus clock cards shows 54 and 50 hours respectively and
the work complete. However Mark worked 4 hours on the indirect job given that week.
However, 40 and 60 containers of Mark and Markus fail to pass inspection due to faulty
materials. It was agreed to credit all output for bonus purposes.
Required;
i) Bonus due
ii) Total gross wage due
iii) Direct wages cost/containers passing inspection. Overtime is worked regularly
throughout the year as company policy due to labour shortage
Solution
Mark Markus
Expected units 400 640
Expected time 80hrs. 96hrs.
Amount payable Sh210 sh220
Actual hours 54 50
Time saved 26 46

Bonus due:
Mark 26 × 200 × 60% =Sh.3,120
Markus 46 × 200 × 60% =sh. 5,520
Total Gross:
Mark 3,120 +( 42×210)+ (12 ×280) =sh. 15,300
Markus 5,520 + (42 ×220) +( 8× 293) = sh17,104
Direct Wages: 15,300 – 4 × 11/3 × 210 =sh. 39.39

Mark 400 – 40
Markus 17,104 = sh29.49

640 - 60
CHARACTERISTICS OF AN EFFECTIVE BONUS SCHEME
i) Efficiency in production: when the volume of production is so important, the bonus incentive
scheme should reward higher producers i.e. should be based on output achieved.
ii) Effect on workers: the scheme should be designed to motivate the employees. It should be
simple and understood by those of average intelligence.
iii) Both the employer and the employees should share the gains in labour efficiency.
iv) This will motivate the employees to be more efficient since they benefit from the gains made.
v) The method of calculating the bonus should be known and acceptable to the employees
vi) The standard hours set should be achievable and realistic. When the standards are high then
the employees will not achieve them and the bonus will not be earned
Benefits associated with group bonus schemes include

 It encourages cooperation and teamwork among workers since each member in thegroup has
an interest in the work.
 It reduces absenteeism since an absent worker is found to reduce the group earningsand the
group may dislike him
 The approach reduces supervision time and cost, thus it is administratively muchsimpler.
 It greatly reduces the number of rates to be negotiated.
 It may encourage flexible working arrangements within the group.
Disadvantages of group bonus schemes

 It may not provide a strong incentive to the individual workers, as it is group based.
 Less hardworking group members are similarly rewarded as the very hardworking ones:this
may cause demotivation in the group.
 It is hard to determine each group members’ fair share of the bonus.

Co-ownership incentive scheme (Profit Sharing Schemes)
Profit-sharing scheme is where a proportion of company profits is allocated to employees either
in the form of cash or in company stock. The actual proportion of company profits to be
allocated is normally calculated by a formula which is known in advance. This converts
employees from mere salary seekers to individuals who are part of the organization.
Their purpose is to enable employees to benefit from the success of their employer in a tax
efficient way and, at the same time, encourage them to participate in their success. Approved
profit-sharing schemes facilitate the allocation of company shares rather than the distribution of
company profits in the form of cash. To receive the tax advantages, a profit-sharing schememust
be set up under trust and approved by the Revenue. The trust receives a proportion of the
company’s profits, which it uses to buy shares for allocation to individual employees.
Employees must agree to leave their shares in the scheme for at least two years (unless they
leave due to injury, redundancy or retirement). If they leave for any other reason, they must leave
their shares in the scheme until they have been held for two years. If shares are sold within five
years, income tax is payable on a percentage of their value or on the proceeds of the sale
(whichever is the smaller). Shares which are held for more than five years and then sold are not
liable for any income tax.
CONTROL OF LABOUR COSTS
Most of the firms aim at maximizing profits by minimizing costs, while optimizing on the
revenues received. Labour costs being a significant expense in the books of account must be
controlled in order to ensure that no overpayments are made and that only authorized payments
are effected.
For effective control, the following techniques should be applied

i) Production planning
The preparation of a production planning schedule well in advance with a supporting schedule of
man hour requirements should result in the most efficient use of the man power available. Idle
time should be reduced as much as possible and if possible avoided entirely. The scheme should
also enable the management to predict long term labour requirements.
ii) Labour budget and use of labour standards
A standard of expected performance is required for various reasons.
(1) to make production schedule and labour budgets,
(2) to measure productivity by comparing actual time against an expected time and taking
control action if necessary. Without a labour standard, productivity cannot be measured
or controlled and greater productivity is the only realistic way of reducing labour costs
iii) Labour performance reports
This should provide a periodic stimulus for controlled action. It is from the report that
management is able to identify where the weaknesses were and take appropriate action.

In other words, control action is very effective where regular feedbacks are provided.
iv) Wages incentive schemes
Employees’ productivity can be increased in various ways. One of the major ways that the
employees can be motivated to be more productive and more efficient is through introduction of
successful wages incentive schemes. These schemes reward both the company and employees
for raising productivity.
v) Identification of direct labour

The cost accounting system must be able to identify direct labour cost with a product, job or
process. Cost control may then be applied by the manager responsible for the product, job or
process.
MAINTENANCE OF LABOUR RECORDS
Labour costs are accumulated by various departments. These departments are;-
i) Personnel department
ii) Production planning department
iii) Time keeping department
iv) Wages department
(i) Personnel department

It is responsible for engagement, discharge and transfer of employees, classification and method
of remuneration. It determines which employee to hire, the amount ofremuneration based on the
negotiation and to which branch or department the hired employee shall work.
(ii) Production planning department

It is responsible for scheduling work and issuing job orders to the production department.
It schedules the work as it comes based on a number of factors such as urgency of the assignment
and availability of resources: materials, time and /or others.
(iii) Time keeping department

It is responsible for recording the attendance time and job time i.e. time spent by each worker in
a factory and time spent by each worker on each job.
The documents used are
1. Clock card: it is a document on which is recorded the starting and finishing time of an
employee for the ascertainment of total actual attendance time.
2. Job card; it records time spent on a job
3. Time sheet; It is a record of how a person’s time has been spent daily or weekly.

Time sheets on which the employee enters all particulars himself are commonly issued to
indirect workers e.g. maintenance staff
(iv) Wages department
It is responsible for preparing the payroll and the payment of wages. The routine will require
analysis of clock cards and check of overtime authorization, calculation of bonus, compilation of
gross earning, calculations of deductions, and preparation of pay details for each employee
showing net wages.
To arrive at the net amount of wages, a range of deductions are made from gross earnings.
Some of the deductions are statutory or obligatory in nature while others are voluntary. In
Kenya, statutory deductions are pay as you earn (PAYE) tax, pensions, and employees, national
insurance contributions. The employer is obliged to deduct and submit the deductions to the
relevant parastatal bodies to which they act as agents. Examples of such bodies include Kenya
Revenue Authority (KRA) to whom PAYE tax deducted is remitted, National Hospital Insurance
Fund to whom the national insurance contributions deducted are submitted. Voluntary
deductions include items such as trade union subscription, charity deductions and contributions
to saving schemes.
(v) The cost accounting department

It is responsible for the accumulation and classification of all costs. It will identify the direct and
indirect costs and identify the direct costs with specific jobs, process or product to which they are
charged.
ACCOUNTING FOR OVERHEADS
OVERHEAD COSTING
Overheads areany cost not directly attributed to any cost unit. They can’t be identified with any
particular cost unit. They are incurred for the benefit of cost providers.
They include indirect material cost e.g. fuel and lubricant for machine electronics for welding
etc.
Also indirect labour
Overheads may be divided into production overheads, administration overheads and selling and
distribution. With this, they may be charged to production cost centers i.e. making, finishing and
packing departments, service costs centers, for example, maintenance and power generation or
other non-production cost centers for example administration, selling and distribution.
Production overheads for instance, are added to the prime cost in order to obtain the total
production costs.

Classification Overheads
i) According to behaviour
Can be classified as semi-variable, fixed or semi-fixed costs, Purpose for this classification is for
decision making and cost control.
ii) According to function
This is classification depending with the purpose for which are referred. Is classified into number
of production overheads and none production overheads, administration and saving overheads,
The purpose for this class is to help for accounting of overhead cost costs for products cost
purpose.
Steps involved in accounting for overheads
i) Accumulation of Overheads costs.

Involves identifying the overhead cost and charging them to their respective accounts
ii) Allocation and Apportionment
Refers to charging Overhead to specific departments i.e. dividing the overhead cost among the
departments
Allocation is the process of identification of overhead cost with cost centers. It is charging of
overhead cost identified as incurred in cost center. An expense identified with a dpt. will be
charged that department individually e.g. depreciation, insurance, will be charged on plant
departments.
Appointment is charging of proportions of overhead to cost center based on benefits they have
used from overhead cost .The ha overhead cost have been incurred for the benefit of a number
of cost canters or for the purpose of entire organization, the amount should be shared among
departments hence referred to as appointment.
iii) Re-appointment of service departments Overheads
A service department is one that renders services that contribute in an indirect manner to the
manufacture of a product. They don’t produce but support production activities e.g. canteen
stores.
These departments do not exist on their own they help other departments hence their overheads
must be shared equitably.
Overhead application
This is charging overhead cost to products that have been manufactured in a cost center.
Cost center – Part of entity where manager are responsible for cost

ALLOCATION AND APPORTIONMENT
- Once overhead cost have been identified and accumulated they will be charged to cost
centers. This process involves allocations and appointment, allocation is direct since
Overheads can be identified with specific departments or costs centres.
- Allocation of overheadsthis is the process by which the whole cost items are charged directly
to a cost unit or as a cost center. Examples of such costs include the salary of a service
department manager.
- In apportionment costs must be shared to various departments based on how they have
benefited from overhead cost
- Proper assessment of benefits received by a department is important since it provides the most
equitable basis of apportionment.
- Benefit from each overhead cost will be assessed separately since the measure of benefits
cannot be uniform.
The common basis used in measuring
BASIS Overheads
1. Area occupied - Used for space related overhead.e.g. rent rates, lighting, air
conditioning etc.
2. Book value of building - Building Overheads e.g. departments, repairs, insurance.
3. Book value of plant and
- Plant and machine Overheads like insurance, depreciation,
machine.
4. No. of employees Maintenance etc.
5. Direct wages/salaries - Canteen Overheads, supervision, staff welfare cost etc.
6. Technical estimates e.g. - Staff training, pension contribution, employee’s liability etc.
Kgs/lt - Electricity, water etc.
7. Value of materials
- All Overheads relating to material cost e.g. material handling
8. Direct of labour/machine store keeping storage.
hrs - General Overheads
Illustration
A company has the following costs
Overhead Amount (sh.)
Consumables Department P1 250,000
P2 150,000
S1 100,000
S2 50,000
Depreciation of factory 1,000,000
Supervision 1.5M
Depreciation of equipment 800,000
Canteen 900,000
Heat & Air Conditioning 500,000
Insurance of Equipment 200,000

The information relating to department is as follows:-
Dpt. Area occupied No. of employees Bk. Value of
equipment’s.
P1 1,200 30 3,000,000
P2 1,600 30 2,500,000
S1 800 15 1,000,000
400 15 500,000
S2
Required
Calculate the amount that will be distributed to each department.
Solution
Overheads Basis Ratios Amount P1 P2 S1 S2
Consumables Allocation - 550,000 250,000 150,000 100,000 50,000
Depreciation Are occupied 3:4:2:1 1,000,000 400,000 400,000 200,000 100,000
of factory
No. of
Supervision Employees 2:2:1:1 1,500,000 500,000 500,000 250,000 250,000
Depreciation. Book value 6:5:2:1 800,000 243,857 285,714 114,265 37142
of equipment of Equipment
Number of
Canteen Employees. 2:2:2:1 900,000 300,000 300,000 130,000 150,000
Heating Area. 3:4:2:1 500,000 150,000 200,000 100,000 50,000
Insurance Book. Value 6:5:2:1 200,000 85,714 71429 28571 14286
of.
equipment
3,950,000 1,928,571 1,907,143 942,856 671,428
Overheads of service department

Service department is one which exists to support the production activities.
It does not contribute directly in the conversion of r/m to finished products. Since there is no
production that takes place in the department the overheads will be shared by the department that
have benefited from service department.
Reapportionment of overheads (secondary apportionment) occurs when service department

costs are charged to user departments. For example, the maintenance department overhead costs
are summarized and then charged to the user department, which will probably include other
service or non-production departments.

Service departments do not participate directly in the manufacturing process but play a
supportive indirect role. Products do not pass through the support departments. It is for this
reason that service department costs have to be reapportioned to the production cost centers or
departments.
Apportionment is based on proportion of benefits received from service dpt. measured using the
following basis.
Service dpt. Basis

Stores No. of requisition, materials consumed etc.
Maintenance Maintenance hrs.
Canteen No. of employees
Purchase dpt. No. of orders, materials purchased etc.
The re-apportionment of service department costs may be implemented in a number of ways.
The three extremes are:

a) Direct Method; where costs of each service department are only charged to production
centers. Administration; selling and distribution centers are not charged with the cost of the
service departments as they are not production centers.
b) Where the reciprocal nature of service costs is fully recognized; that is service departments
serve each other, a different approach is adapted. This can be implemented in a number of
ways:
1. The repeated distribution method: this recognizes fully the reciprocal nature of service
departments. It apportions the overhead costs. It continuously reapportions a share of a
service cost center to other service centers instead of eliminating a center once its costs
have been reapportioned.
2. Using an algebraic approach: this recognizes the reciprocal nature of the service
departments and expresses it as an equation.
c) A compromise method (elimination method or stepwise method) may be used where by the
costs of each service cost centers are re-apportioned in turn. The costs of the first service
center will be reapportioned to all user centers including other service centers, if any. The first
service center, however, is then eliminated from any further reapportionment. The cost of the
second service center including any costs already reapportioned from the first service center is
then reapportioned to all user centers other than the first service center. The process is
continued until all service centers are eliminated.

Service department providing services to other service department.
Where service department providing services to production and to other service departments the
OC will be after the service department have received their share and then other amount charged
to production department. This will ensure that each department shares its equitable share of O/H
costs of services department it has benefited from.
METHODS USEDIN RE-APPORTIONMENT OF OVERHEADS

The following method may be used to re-apportion overhead of service department. In this case
1. Direct allocation method
2. Step wise allocation/elimination method
3. Repeated distribution method
4. Simultaneous/algebraic equation method
Direct allocation Method

In this method, services provided by services to each other are ignored. Overheads from service
department will only be apportioned to production department i.e. only production department
shared the cost not recommended as it ignores services provided by service department for
themselves which may lead to some department having unfair share of overhead cost
Step wise allocation/elimination method
In this method the service department that provides most services to the other service department
is identified and its overheads will be re-apportioned first. Once the app. no further re-apportion
will be made to other departments i.e. close down.
The 2 is department providing most services to remaining services to remaining service
department will be re-apportioned next then close down, this procedure is repeated until the last
service department is re-apportioned.
Illustration
MMC Ltd. produces machine parts on a job-order basis. Majority of the business contracts are
obtained through bidding. Business firms competing with MMC Ltd. bid full cost plus 20 per
cent mark up. Recently, with the expectation of increase in sales MMC Ltd. reduced its mark up
from 25 per cent to 20 per cent.
The company operates two support departments and two production departments. The budgeted
costs and the normal activity levels for each department are given below:
Support Departments Production Departments
Maintenance Power Grinding Assembly
Overhead costs (Shs.) 1,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 500,000
Number of employees 8 7 30 30
Maintenance hours 2,000 200 6,400 1,600
Machine hours - - 10,000 1,000
Labour hours - - 1,000 10,000

1. The direct costs of the maintenance department are allocated on the basis of employees while
those of power department are allocated on the basis of maintenance hours.
2. Departmental overhead rates are used to assign costs to products. Grinding department uses
machine hours and assembly department uses labour hours.
MMC Ltd. is preparing to bid for a contract, job K, that requires three machine hours per unit
produced in grinding and zero hours in assembly department. The expected prime costs per unit
are Shs. 670.
Required:
a) Allocate the support service costs to the production departments using the direct allocation
method.
b) Allocate the service costs to the production departments using the sequential allocation
method
Solution
(a) Overhead allocation (direct method)
Profit statement (absorption costing)
Production departments Support departments
Grinding Assembly Maintenance Power
Sh. Sh. Sh. Sh.
Direct costs 1,000,000 500,000 1,000,000 2,000,000
Maintenance 500,000 500,000 (1,000,000) -
Power 1,600,000 400,000 - (2,000,000)
3,100,000 1,400,000 - -
(b) Overhead allocation (sequential method)

Sh. Sh. Sh. Sh.
Direct costs 1,000,000 500,000 1,000,000 2,000,000
Power department 1,280,000 320,000 400,000 (2,000,000)
Maintenance 700,000 700,000 (1,400,000)
2,980,000 1,520,000 - -

Workings
MMC Ltd.
(a) Power cost allocated according to maintenance hours
6,400 + 1,600 = 8,000

6,400 x 2,000,000 = 1,600,000
8,000
1,600 x 2,000,000 = 400,000
8000
(b) Maintenance cost allocated to employees

30 + 30 = 60
30 x 1,000,000 = 500,000
60
30 x 1,000,000 = 500,000
60
(c) Power apportioned to machine hours
2,000 + 6,400 + 1,600 = 10,000

2,000 x 2,000,000 = 400,000  Maintenance
10,000
6,400 x 2,000,000 = 1,280,000  Grinding

10,000
1,600×2,000,000 = 320,000  Assembly

10,000
Maintenance - Allocated according to number of employees

Grinding 30 x 1,400,000 = 700,000
60
Assembly 30 x 1,400,000 = 700,000

60
Repeated Distribution
This recognizes fully the reciprocal nature of service departments. It apportions the overhead
costs. It continuously reapportions a share of a service cost center to other service centers instead
of eliminating a center once its costs have been reapportioned.

This method differs from the elimination method in that it continues to reapportion a share of a
service cost center to other service centers instead of eliminating a center once its costs have
been reapportioned in the first instance. The cycle is repeated until the numbers become so small
that no further reapportionments are required
Simultaneous/Algebraic Equation Method

In this method, we form two equations which give the total costs of service departments after
sharing overheads from the other service department.
The total overheads cost will be allocated on the basis of the total cost from the equation.
Total cost will be the allocated cost plus a share of other overheads of the other service
departments.
Total Overheads = Allocated Overheads + A share of overheads from service department.
Since total overheads are unknown the equation of total overheads will be formed and solved to
determine total overheads of service departments.
The total overheads will be shared to departments that have benefited.

Let X = Total overheads of service department 1
Y = Total overheads of service department 2
This method requires that the reciprocal nature of the service costs is expressed in a set of
simultaneous equations which are solved by matrix algebra
Let x = Total cost of the maintenance cost center
Let y = Total cost of the power generating cost center
Then x = 23050 + 0.20Y

Y = 26100 + 0.20x
The equation shows that;

Maintenance cost = initial allocated and apportioned costs of Shs.23050 plus 8% of the total cost
of the power generating center
Power generating cost = initial allocated and apportioned costs of Shs. 26100 plus 20% of the
total cost of maintenance center
Illustration
Bingwa Ltd. has three production departments and two service departments.
The following are the budgeted factory overheads for the year ended 31 December 2011:
The service department costs are to be apportioned as follows:

Production departments Service departments
A B C 1 2
Service department 1 20% 40% 30% - 10%
Service departments 40% 20% 20% 20% -
2
Required:
Re-apportion the service department costs to the production departments using the simultaneous
equation method.
Solution
Re-apportioning the service department costs using the simultaneous method
S1 = 30,000 + 20% S2
S2 = 36,000 + 10% S1
36,000 = S2 -10% S1
30,000 = S1 -20%S2
36,000 = -10%S1 = S2
30,000 = S1 -20% S2
39,000 = 1.02S2
Therefore S2 =38,235
And S1 =37,647
Overheads reapportionment schedule

A B C 1 2
Shs ‘000’ Shs ‘000’ Shs ‘000’ Shs ‘000’ Shs ‘000’
Apportioned and allotted 96,000 84,000 60,000

Reapportionment as follows
S2: 38,235 (20%, 40%, 30%) 7,647 15,294 11,471
S1: 37,647 (40%, 20%, 20% ) 15,059 7,529 7,529
118,706 106,823 79,000

OVERHEADS ABSORPTION
Once overheads have been allocated, apportioned and reapportioned to product departments the
overheads will be charged to units or to products produced in that department. This is known as
recovery/application/absorption of overheads.
It is defined at charging of production overheads to units produced in a production department.
It involves two steps:
i) Computation of overheads rate (AR)
ii) Application of the rates to cost unit.
Computation of overheads absorption rates

Overheads are incurred for the benefits of a no. of units or for the entire department and thus a
way of sharing the overheads to cost units will need to be determined.
Overhead Absorption Rate (OAR)

Overhead Absorption Ratesare usually computed for the purpose of department and units of the
base selected for overheads absorption
Only are absorption rate is computed and used for any single group of overheads for each
department. It may be based on actual figures or estimated figures.
Actual figures are determined at the end of the period and in this case OAR is based on the actual
overheads and actual units of the base selected.
Certain limitations arise from use of actual data and therefore actual rates are not preferable. This
is due to:-
i) Actual data can only be compared at the end of the period delaying computation of the
product cost.
ii) Actual rates may vary from period to period making comparison to be difficult
iii) It causes delay in determination of selling prices
Estimated data is the budgeted data at the beginning of that period.

Predetermined overhead rates are computed from the data and is based estimated overheads and
estimated units of the base
Determination of suitable method and charging overheads

Adoption of unsuitable method of overheads absorption may lead to misleading results and
therefore distort product cost
Generally the following factors should be considered when determining the method of charging
overheads.

1) Type of industry
This helps indicate the method of production is whether production is continuous through job
orders provision of services etc. Different methods will be appropriate and different industries.
2) Nature of the manufacturing process
This determines whether the manufacturing is manual (labour intensive) or mechanical (machine
intensive)
3) Formation of overheads
This refers to the computation of overheads cost and each department.
4) Stability of re-apportionment method prices and labour rates
Material costs and labour costs can only be used as the basis of the rates are stable. This is to
ensure that some products are charged with same overheads.
5) Operating capacity
This is analysing whether the company is operating at capacity, under capacity or over capacity.
It helps determine the number of units that will share the overheads cost.
6) Policy of the management
The method should not be inconsistent with the management policies or overhead absorption.
Methods of overhead absorption
i) Direct labour hours

This method gives consideration for time spent in production overheads are charged to cost units
based on labour hours required in production.
It is appropriate where production is labour intensive.
OAR = Budgeted Overhead

Budgeted labour hours
ii) Machine hours
In this method, overheads are charged to cost unit based on machine hours required in
production. It is used where production is machine intensive.

Budgeted machine hours
iii) Direct material cost percentage

Overheads are charged as a percentage of direct material cost.
It is appropriate where material data is readily available and where most of the overheads are
material related.
OAR = Budgeted Overhead×100%

Budgeted material cost

iv) Direct labour cost percentage rate
Overheads are charged as a percentage of labour costs. It is used where departments are labour
intensive and some rate of payment is paid. It is not appropriate where labour cost is based on
pieces produced and where overtime premium and bonuses are paid since they distort labour cost
of output.
Budgeted labour cost
Prime cost percentage

This is applicable under the conditions of material and labour percentage above.

Budgeted prime cost
NB
The cost related basis may not be appropriate due to distorted costs where there is regular
changes in prices and rates of payment
They will only be appropriate where price and rates are stable
Units of output
Overheads are charged per unit produced. It is appropriate where similar products are produced.
It will not be preferred where products of different sizes or different qualities since they require
different resources.

Budgeted Output
Illustration
The following information was extracted from the books of ABC Ltd.
Budget A B
Machine hours 10,000 12,000
Output unit 1000 1500
Material cost 32,000 28,000
Labour cost 40,000 38,000
Labour hours 18,000 22,000
Budgeted overheads 36,000 42,000
Required
Calculate the overhead absorption rate of a department using
i) Direct labour hours
ii) Direct machine cost percentage
iii) Direct labour cost percentage

iv) Prime cost percentage
v) Units of output
vi) Direct machine hour
Solution
A B
i) OAR = Budgeted OH 3,600 42,000

Budgeted labour. Hrs. 1,800 22,000
= Sh. 2/hr. = Sh. 1.9/hr.
ii) OAR = Budgeted OH 36,000 42,000

Budgeted Machine. Hrs. 10,000 12,000
= Sh. 3.6/hr. = Sh. 3.5/hr.
iii) OAR = Budgeted OH x 100 36,000 x 100 42,000 x 100

Budgeted mgt. cost 32,000 28,000
= 112.5% = 150%
iv) OAR = Budgeted OH × 100 36,000 × 100 42,000 x 100

Budgeted labour cost 40,000 38,000
= 90% = 105%
v) OAR = Budgeted OH x 100 36,000 x 100 42,000 x 100

Budgeted Prime cost 72,000 66,000
= 50% = 63.4%
Prime cost = direct labour cost + direct mat. Cost
A = 40,000 + 32,000 = 72,000
B = 35,000 + 28,000 = 66,000
vi) OAR = Budgeted OH 36,000 42,000
Budgeted Output 1,000 1,500
=36 out unit =28
APPLICATION OF OVERHEAD ABSORPTION RATE TO OUT UNITS
In order to determine the total cost of a product, the overheads are charged to the products on the
basis of the computed OAR.
The overheads charged to a cost unit will be the function of the OAR for the department and the
units of the base that a product requires.
Overhead charge or absorbed = OAR x Units of base/units

OVER/UNDER ABSORPTION OF OVERHEADS
Overheads are absorbed using predetermined overhead absorption rate based on the budgeted
data at the beginning of the period.
Budgeted data may be different from actual at the end of the period i.e. the actual may be more
or less than the budget since budget is an estimate.
The difference between the actual and the budgeted data is known as over/under absorption of
overheads.
Over absorption arises where absorbed overheads to production is more than actual overheads.
This means that more overheads have been charged to production which results in overstatement
of cost of production as well as product cost.
Under absorption arises where absorbed overheads is less than actual overheads.
This means that production cost is understated as well as the production cost.
Causes of over/under absorption

1. Poor estimation of cost data (poor budgeting)
2. Adoption of unsuitable method of overheads absorption
3. Changes in method of production during the period
4. Unforeseen changes in product capacity resulting in production of more or less units than
budgeted.
5. Seasonal fluctuations in overheads cost due to inflation, deflation etc.
Treatment of over/under absorption

Over/under absorption results in overstatement/understatement of cost of production and
therefore adjustment need to be made on production cost of goods sold and inventories.
The treatment depends on whether the amount is substantial or not.
This treatment include
i) Use of supplementary rates.

If the amount is substantial i.e. has a significant effect on cost of production, the cost of
goods sold and the cost of inventories at the end of the period will need to be adjusted to
reflect the actual.
ii) Write off to P&L statement
If the amount is not substantial and will not have a significant effect on inventory values, the
amount will be written on to P&L is expensed as a cost for the period
iii) Carry over to the next period
In this case the amount will be put in an overhead suspense a/c and carried forward to the
next year it will be off set with next year’s overheads.
The problem with this method is that cost of production will not reflect the actual cost for the
period.

iv) Over/under absorption = Absorbed OH – Actual O/H
Illustration
Matatu Auto Spares Ltd. uses budgeted overhead rate in allocating overheads to individual job
orders on the basis of machine hours in department A and on the basis of direct labour cost for
department B.
The budgeted forecast for the six month period to June 2009 was as follows:
Department
A B
Material costs (Sh.) 100,000 80,000
Labour costs (Sh.) 80,000 120,000
Factory overheads (Sh.) 200,000 240,000
The actual results for the period were as follows:

Department
A B
Factory overheads (Sh.) 95,000 98,000
The following information relates to job order number B2:

Department
A B
Material costs (Sh.) 30,000 24,000
Labour costs (Sh.) 40,000 18,000
Required:
(i) The budgeted overhead rate for department A and department B.
(ii) The total overhead cost for Job B2.
(iii)The cost per unit for Job B2 given that the output is 10,000 units.
Solution
Matatu Auto Spares Ltd

i) Budgeted overhead rate for department A and department B
Overheads absorption rate =

ℎ
ℎ
Department A
OAR =
ℎ
ℎ ℎ
200,000
10,000
Shs 20/ machine hour
Department B
OAR =
ℎ
240,000/120,000
2 × 100% =200%
ii) Total overhead cost for Job B2

Overheads absorbed= O.A.R × actual units of the base
Overheads for Job No. B2
Shs
Department A =20× 2,400 48,000
Department B= 200%×18,000 36,000
Total Overheads 84,000
iii)The cost per unit for job B2 given that the output is 10,000 units
Cost Statement
Shs
Material cost (30,000 + 24,000 54,000
Labour cost (40,000 + 18,000) 58,000
112,000
Add overheads 84,000
Total Cost 196,000
,
= = = shs. 19.6 Per unit.
,

Illustration
Mjengo Ltd. Is a medium sized company which operates three production departments and two
service departments. The three production departments are: Machinery department D, machinery
department E and Assembly department. The two service departments are materials procurement
and general support department.
The annual overhead costs are as follows:

Sh. Sh.
Indirect salaries and wages
Machinery department: D 2,500,000
E 2,500,000
Assembly 3,750,000
Materials procurement 2,750,000
General support 3,700,000 15,200,000
Indirect materials
Machinery department: D 1,250,000
E 2,012,500
Assembly 262,500
Materials procurement 0
General support 25,000 3,550,000
Others:
Electricity 1,250,000
Taxes 2,500,000
Insurance of machinery 375,000
Depreciation of machinery 3,750,000
Insurance of buildings 625,000
Salaries of the workers 2,000,000 10,500,000
2,9250,000
1. The following are additional information is available from books of Mjengo Ltd.
Book value Area occupied Number of Direct Machine

Machinery (square employees labour hours
metres hours
Machinery
department : D 20,000,000 25,000 750 2,500,000 5,000,000
E 12,500,000 12,500 500 2,500,000 2,500,000
Assembly 2,500,000 37,500 750 5,000,000
Stores 1,250,000 37,500 250
Maintenance 1,250,000 12,500 250
37,500,000 125,000 2500
2. The total direct and indirect materials issued to the production department are as follows:
Machinery D 10,000,000

E 7,500,000
assembly 2,500,000
20,000,000
Required:
(a) Overheads analysis sheet.
(b) Reallocation of service department costs
(c) Overhead rates for each production department
Solution:
(a) Overhead analysis sheet
Production departments Service departments

Machine Machine Assemb Materialp Genera
ry ry ly rocureme l
Item of Basis of Total D E nt suppor
expenditure allocation t
Sh Sh 000 Sh000 Sh000 Sh000 Sh000
000
Indirect wages Direct 15,200 2,500 2,500 3,750 2,750 3,700
and salaries
Indirect Direct 3,550 1,250 2,012 262.5 - 25
materials
Electricity Area 1,250 250 125 375 375 125
Taxes Area 2,500 500 250 750 750 250
Insurance of Book value 375 200 125 25 12.5 12.5
machinery of
machinery
Insurance of Area 625 125 62.5 187.5 187.5 62.5
buildings
Salaries of site Number of 2,000 600 400 60 200 200
workers employees
Depreciation of Book value
machinery of 3,750 2,000 1,250 250 125 125
machinery
29,250 7,245 6,725 6,200 4,400 4,500

Total allocated and apportioned
(b) Reallocation of service departments costs
Item of Basis of Total Production departments Service departments

expenditure allocation
Machinery Machinery Assembly Materials General
D E procurement support
Sh. Sh. Sh. Sh. Sh. Sh.
Materials Value of - 2,200,000 1,650,000 550,000 4,400,000 -
procurement materials
issued
General Direct - 1,125,000 1,125,000 2,250,000 - 4,500,000
support labour
hours
Total overhead costs
(c)
Machinery department D = 7,425,000 + 2,200,000 + 1,125,000
Machinery department D = 10,750,000 = Sh. 2.15 per machine hours
5,000,000
Machinery department E = 6,725,000 + 1,650,000 + 1,125,000

Machinery department E = 9,500,000 = Sh. 3.80 per machine hours
2,500,000
Assembly department = 9,000,000 = Sh. 1.80 per machine hours

5,000,000
ACTIVITY BASED COSTING (ABC)
ABC is a costing method which recognizes that costs are incurred because of the activities which
take place within the organization and for each activity a cost driver may be identified.
Those costs which are driven or incurred by the same cost drivers are grouped together into cost
pools and the cost drivers are then used as a basis for charging the cost of each activity in the
product.
A cost pool is a collection of costs which may be charged to products by the use of a common
cost driver. A cost driver is any activity or activities, series of which take place within an
organization and which cause costs to be incurred. The essence of ABC is that activities are the
cost drivers, not products. Products do consume activities. If the cost of activities and their

relationship to products is understood, there can be established basis for product costing,
performance measurement and profitability analysis.
Some examples of cost pools and related cost drivers are as shown below.
Cost pool Cost driver
Power Number of machine operations
Material handling Quantity or weight of materials handled
Material receipt Number of batches of materials received
Production planning Number of jobs or materials planned
Sales administration Number of customers or orders received
Set up costs Number of jobs run
The development of ABC has been a response to a change in the cost base of many
manufacturers over the last decades. In earlier times, most manufacturing was labour intensive.
The variable cost of direct labour greatly outweighed all other costs and the overheads were a
relatively small component of the total cost. Traditional absorption costing was accurate enough
in these circumstances. Nowadays, most manufacturing processes are automated. The fixed
overhead cost of depreciation is now an important component of the total cost. At the same time,
work forces have been greatly reduced. This means that the variable cost of direct labour is now
a much smaller proportion of the total cost. Traditional absorption costing has become inaccurate
as a result and misleading product costs have led to poor decision making.
ABC analyses costs as short-term variable cost and long-term variable costs. Short-term variable
costs equate with variable costs under the traditional absorption costing. These characteristics are
volume related and change proportionately with the volume of production. Long-term variable
costs are equivalent to fixed costs under traditional cost accounting. Under ABC, such costs do
vary with activity even though there is a time lag e.g. salaried production engineers will not be
immediately made redundant if the number of products decline but they may be if decline
continues.
Guidelines to activity based costing

(i) Identification of the organization’s major activities
(ii) Identification of the cost drivers. These are factors which determine the size of the costs of
the activity or causes of the incurrence of costs. Volume related cost drivers are commonly
used for costs that vary with the production levels in the short term.
Examples of some costs and their cost drivers are shown below
Activity Possible cost driver
Car fuel cost Number of kilometers
Materials handling Number of production runs
Production scheduling Number of production runs
Mailing costs Number of mails sent

(iii) Collection of the costs of each activity into cost pools. Cost pools are equivalent to cost
centers. They are used to describe locations to which overhead costs are initially assigned.
(iv) Charging support overheads to products on the basis of their usage of the activity. A
product’s usage of an activity is measured by the number of the activity’s cost driver it
generates. The service costs are only allocated to the production department according to
the usage of the services provided.
Absorption costing and ABC are similar in many respects. In both systems, direct costs go
straight to the product and overheads are allocated to production cost centers/cost pools. The
difference lies in the manner in which overheads are absorbed into products.
Selecting the cost drivers

In the main, the cost driver will be measured in terms of volume of transactions. However, ABC
also tries to identify costs that are not contributing to the value of the product / service so the
following questions are relevant:
 What services does this activity provide?
 Who receives the service?
 Why do you require so many people?
 What might cause you to require more/less staff?
 Why does over/idle time exist?
Three types of cost driver emerge;-
Pure activity output volume – where the basic transactions of the activity are identical in terms
of their resource demands such as the purchasing of raw materials or a similar range of items.
Activity/output volume/complexity – where the basic transactions differ in terms of their
resource demands as when purchases are made from different overseas suppliers.
Situation – where an underlying factor can be identified as driving the workload of an activity
such as the number of suppliers when supplier vetting and liaison were vital components of the
cost pool.
Example of cost drivers

The following are examples of cost drivers in the manufacturing sector.
Activity Cost driver
Material procurement Number of purchase orders
Material handling Number of movements
Quality control Number of inspections
Engineering services Number of change orders
Maintenance Number of break downs
Line set-up Number of set-ups

For the service sector the following taken from the field of health care may serve as an example.
The cost drivers from the basis of costs charged to patients.
Activity Cost driver
Patient movement Number of in-patients
Booking appointments Number of patients
Patients reception Number of patients
X-ray:
Equipment preparation Time taken
Patient preparation Time taken
Patient aftercare Time taken
Film processing Number of images
Film reporting Number of images
The Merits of Activity Based Costing

The following are the main claims made regarding ABC:
 More realistic product costs are provided especially in Advanced Manufacturing Technology
(AMT) factories where support overheads are a significant proportion of total costs.
 More overheads can be traced to the product. In modern factories there are a growing number
of non-factory floor activities. ABC is concerned with all activities so takes product costing
beyond the traditional factory floor basis.
 ABC recognises that it is activities which cause cost, not products and it is products which
consume activities.
 ABC focuses attention on the real nature of cost behaviour and helps in reducing costs and
identifying activities which do not add value to the product.
 ABC recognises the complexity and diversity of modern production by the use of multiple
cost drivers, many of which are transaction based rather than based solely on production
volume.
 ABC provides a reliable indication of long-run variable product cost which is relevant to
strategic decision making.
 ABC is flexible enough to trace costs to processes, customers, areas of managerial
responsibility, as well as product costs.
 ABC provides useful financial measures (e.g. cost driver rates) and non- financial measures
(e.g. transaction volumes).
 The principle of using activities to trace costs can be applied across a range of
service industries as well as manufacturing firms
Criticisms of ABC
 A full ABC system with numerous cost pools with multiple cost driver undeniably more
complex than traditional systems and will thus be expensive to administer.
 Much of work is defense related and pricing is on a cost-plus basis hence the need to show
accurate product costs. The applicability of ABC to companies has to use market-based

pricing and do not have the same high technology
structure has been questioned.
 Many practical problems are unresolved. Examples include: common cost driver selection,
non-linearity of cost driver rates etc.
Perhaps the key word in that definition is traceable, whether or not a cost can be traced
objectively to the production/delivery of a good/service.
Illustration
Assume that a firm makes four products A, B, C and D. Data for the past period are as follows:
Product Output No. of Direct Machine Material Material
units production labour hrs. hours per cost per components
runs in per unit unit unit per unit
Shs
period
A 25 3 2 2 30 8
B 25 4 4 4 75 5
C 250 7 2 2 30 8
D 250 10 4 4 75 6
24
Direct labour cost sh.7 per hour.

Overhead costs Sh.
Short-run variable costs 8,250
Long-run variable costs: 7,680
Scheduling costs 3,600
Material handling costs 7,650
27,180
Find the unit production cost

a) Using conventional product costing using a labour hour or machine hour overhead absorption
rate.
b) Using ABC with the following cost drivers:
Short-term variable costs Machine hours
Scheduling costs: No. of production runs
Set-up costs: No. of production runs
Materials handling costs: No. of components
c) Compare the results from the two methods

Solution
a) Compare costing
Total machine hours in period
Product Hours
A 25 ×2 = 50
B 25 × 4 = 100
C 250 x 2 = 500
D 250 x 4 = 1,000
1,650
OAR based on machine hours = sh.27,180 = sh.16.47 per machine hours
1,650
Cost summary using conventional costing

A B C D Total
Sh. Sh. Sh. Sh. Sh.
Direct materials 750 1,875 7,500 18,750
Direct labour 350 700 3,500 7,000
Prime costs 1,100 2,575 11,000 25,750 40,425
Overheads @ 16.47 per mc hour 824 1,647 8,235 16,470 27,176
Total cost 1,924 4,222 19,235 42,220 67,601
Units produced 25 25 250 250
Cost per unit (rounded) 77 169 77 169
Calculation of cost driver rates

Short-term variable costs sh.8,250 machine hours = sh.5 per machine hour
1,650
Scheduling costs 7,680 production runs = sh.320 per production run

24
Set up costs 3,600 production runs =sh.150 per production run
24
Material handling costs sh.7,650 components = sh.2 per component
3,825
Number of components in period = 25 x 8 x 25 x 5 + 250 x 8 + 250 x 6 = 3,825.

b) Using ABC
Cost summary using ABC
A B C D Total
Sh. Sh. Sh. Sh. Sh.
Prime cost 1,100 2,575 11,000 25,750 40,425
Short run variable costs @ sh.5 per machine 250 500 2,500 5,000 8,250
hour 960 1,280 2,240 3,200 7,680
Scheduling @ sh.320 per run 450 600 1,050 1,500 3,600
Set-up @ sh.150 per run 400 250 4,000 3,000 7,650
Materials handling @ sh.2 per component 3,160 5,205 20,790 38,450 67,605
Total cost 25 25 250 250
Units produced 126.4 208.2 83.16 153.8
Costs per unit
Slight difference in total cost due to rounding of figures
c) Comparing the results we obtain

Products
A B C D
Sh. Sh. Sh. Sh.
Unit cost: conventional 77 169 77 169
Unit cost: ABC 126.4 208.2 83.16 153.8
Percentage change using ABC +64% +23 +8% -9%
It will be seen that ABC charges more overheads to lower volume production and tends to charge
relatively less to higher volume production, especially product D in this case.
The above example has deliberately been kept simple in order to show the principles of the ABC
method.
REVISION QUESTIONS
QUESTION ONE
Wangu Manufacturing Company Ltd. is located at the industrial area in Nairobi. The company
uses four different machine groups, A, B, C and D in its manufacturing process.
The overhead costs budget for the year ending 31 December 2003 is as follows:

Sh. ‘000’
Indirect wages 12,000
Holiday pay and national insurance 10,200
Supervision 16,680
Machine maintenance (wages) 14,000
Supplies 2,600
Power 4,200
Tooling costs 13,300
Insurance of machinery 2,520
Insurance of buildings 1,600
Depreciation 10,500
Rent and rates 12,400
100,000
At present, overheads are absorbed into the cost of the company’s products by means of a single
direct wages percentage of 70 percent. The company wishes to change to machine hour
overhead absorption rate for each of its four different machine groups.
The following data is available for each of the four machine groups:
Machine groups
A B C D Total
Sh. ‘000’ Sh. Sh. Sh. Sh. ‘000’
‘000’ ‘000’ ‘000’
Tooling costs 5,400 4,100 2,600 1,200 13,300
Supervision 5,170 4,720 3,630 3,160 16,680
Supplies 1,200 800 200 400 2,600
Cost of machines 32,000 24,000 10,000 18,000 84,000
Machine maintenance hours 3,000 2,000 4,000 1,000 10,000

Number of direct workers 6 6 2 2 16
Total number of workers 26 34 15 10 85
Floor space (square feet) 3,000 2,400 1,600 1,000 8,000
Machine running hours 30 60 25 10 125
Machine power rating 55,000 27,000 8,000 15,000 105,000
(kilowatts)
Required:
(a) Machine hour overhead absorption rate for each of the four groups of machines.
(b) The overhead cost to be absorbed by product XY123 if:
(i) It utilizes the following time resources of the indicated machine groups:

Hours Machine group
8 A
3 B
1 C
4 D
(ii) Direct labour cost is Sh. 22,000,000 and the direct wages percentage method is used.
Solution:
(a) Computation of Overhead Absorption Rates per Machine Hour
Overhead Absorption A B C D Total

basis Sh.’000’ Sh.’000’ Sh.’000’ Sh.’000’ Sh.’000’
Indirect wages No. of indirect 3,478 4,870 2,261 1,391 12,000
workers
Holiday pay & No. of workers 3,210 4,080 1,800 1,200 10,200
National (Total)
Insurance
Supervision Actual 5,170 4,720 3,630 3,160 16,680
Machine Machine 4,200 2,800 5,600 1,400 14,000
maintenance maintenance
(wages) hours
Supplies Actual 1,200 800 200 400 2,600
Power Machine power 2,200 1,080 320 600 4,200
Tooling costs Actual 5,400 4,100 2,600 1,200 13,300
Insurance – Cost of 960 720 300 540 2,520
Machinery machines
Insurance – Floor space 600 480 320 200 1,600
buildings
Depreciation Cost of 4,000 3,000 1,250 2,250 10,500
machines
Rent & rates Floor space 4,650 3,720 2,480 1,550 12,400
Total 34,978 30,370 20,761 13,891 100,000
Therefore No. of machine hours: 30 60 25 10
Absorption rate per machine hour 1,165.93 506.17 830.44 1,389.1

(b) Product XY 123
(i) Absorption No. of Hours Overhead

rate Absorbed
Sh.’000’
A 1,165.93 8 9,327.44
B 506.17 3 1,518.51
C 830.44 1 830.44
D 1,389.10 4 5,556.40
17,232.79
(ii) Overhead:
= 70% of direct wages
= 70% x 22,000,000 = 15,400,000
QUESTION TWO
The following budget and actual results relates to Cypo Ltd. for the last three quarters for the
year ended 31 March 2004.
Budget: Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4

to to 31/12/2003 to
30/9/2003 31/3/2004
Sales (units) 10,000 14,000 12,200
Production (units) 8,000 14,200 12,400
Fixed overheads (Sh. 10,400 19,170 17,360
‘000’)
Actual results 9,600 12,400 10,200

Sales (units) 8,400 13,600 9,200
Production (units) 11,200 18,320 16,740
Fixed overheads (Sh.
‘000’)
The value of the opening and closing stock of the units produced is arrived at by using the FIFO
stock valuation method. The budgeted and actual opening stock for the quarter ended 30 June
2003 was 2,600 units and its valuation included Sh. 3,315,000 of fixed overheads. The company
absorbs its fixed overheads using a pre-determined fixed overhead absorption rate per unit which

is the same for each quarter. It is assumed that variable costs per unit and selling price per unit
remained the same for each of the three quarters.
Required:
(a) Calculate the under or over-recovery of fixed overheads for each quarter and indicate how it
will affect the profit or loss for the year ended 31 March 2004.
(b) Using the actual results given above, explain whether absorption costing gives a higher profit
figure than marginal costing.
(c) Explain briefly why absorption costing is usually considered to be unsuitable as an aid to
decision making.
Solution:
(a) Calculation of fixed overhead absorption rates
Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4
Sh. Sh. Sh.
Budgeted FOH 10,400,000 19,170,00 17,360,000
Budgeted Production (units) 8,000 14,200 12,400
FOH absorption rate (per unit) 1,300 1,350 1,400
FOH absorbed (actual units x 10,920,000 18,360,000 12,880,000
rate) 11,200,000 18,320,000 16,740,000
Less actual FOH 280,000 40,000 3,860,000
Under absorbed Over Under
Deduction absorbed absorbed
Effects on Profit & Loss A/c Profit & Loss Add back Deduct
In Profit & In Profit &
Loss Loss
(b) Units in Closing Stock

Sh. Sh. Sh.
Units 2,600 2,400 2,600
Opening stock 8,400 13,600 9,200
Add: Production 11,000 15,000 11,800
Less: Sales 9,600 12,400 10,200
Closing stock 1,400 2,600 1,600
Whether marginal costing or absorption costing produces a higher profit in a given period
depends entirely on the amount of fixed overheads in opening and closing stocks. Fixed
overhead content of stocks.

Sh. Sh. Sh.
F.O content of closing stock 1,820,000 3,510,000 2,240,000
(1,400 x (2,600 x 1,350) (1,600 x 1,400)
Less F.O Content of opening 1,300)
Stock (given) 1,820,000 3,510,000
Difference 3,315,000 1,690,000 (1,270,000)
(1,495,000)
Note that opening stock in quarter 3 is the closing stock in quarter 2 and opening stock in quarter
4 is closing stock in quarter 3.
Absorption costing profit is therefore higher than margin profit in quarter 3 but lower in quarter 2
and 4.
(c) Absorption costing is a product convention with many arbitrary assumptions and
subjective assessments e.g. analysis apportionment and absorption of overheads,
treatment of under/over absorption, the way cost centres are determined, the treatment of
service cost centres
In consequence, information based on absorption costing principles is not suitable for use
in decision making.
QUESTION THREE
Ardhi Company is considering the type of remuneration scheme to adopt for its employees. The
following information is availed to you for your analysis:
Mambo Saidi Mbogo
Actual hours worked 38 36 40
Hourly rate of pay (Sh.) 30 20 25
Output (units) A 42 120 -
B 72 76 -
C 92 - 50
A B C
Standard time allowed per unit (minutes) 6 9 15
For the calculation of piecework earnings the company values each minute at the rate of
Sh.0.5.

Required:
Calculate the earnings for each employee using:
Basic guaranteed hourly rates;
i) Piecework rates;
ii) Premium bonus, given that an employee earns the premium bonus at the rate
of two thirds of the time saved.
Solution:
Ardhi Company
i) Basic guaranteed hourly rates used to calculate earnings
Mambo Saidi Mbogo
Actual hours worked 38 36 40
Basic hourly rate of pay 30 20 25
Earnings (Basic x actual hours worked) 1140 720 1000
ii) Piecework rates used to calculate earnings for employees

Mambo Saidi Mbogo
Number of minutes worked 2280 2160 2400
Rate per minute 0.5 0.5 0.5
Earnings (rate x number of minutes) 1140 1080 1200
iii) Premium bonus, given that an employee earns the premium bonus at a rate of 2/3 of the time
saved.
Mambo Saidi Mbogo
Hours allowed 38 23.4 12.5
Hours taken 38 36 40
Hours saved - - -
Bonus hours (2/3 x hours saved) - - -
Bonus wage (bonus hours x hourly rate)
QUESTION FOUR
MMC Ltd. produces machine parts on a job-order basis. Majority of the business contracts are
obtained through bidding. Business firms competing with MMC Ltd. bid full cost plus 20 per
cent mark up. Recently, with the expectation of increase in sales. MMC Ltd. reduced its mark
up from 25 per cent to 20 per cent.

The company operates two support departments and two production departments. The budgeted
costs and the normal activity levels for each department are given below:
Support Departments Production Departments

Maintenance Power Grinding Assembly
Overhead costs (Shs.) 1,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 500,000
Number of employees 8 7 30 30
Maintenance hours 2,000 200 6,400 1,600
Machine hours - - 10,000 1,000
Labour hours - - 1,000 10,000
1. The direct costs of the maintenance department are allocated on the basis of employees while
those of power department are allocated on the basis of maintenance hours.
2. Departmental overhead rates are used to assign costs to products. Grinding department uses
machine hours and assembly department uses labour hours.
MMC Ltd. is preparing to bid for a contract, job K, that requires three machine hours per unit
produced in grinding and zero hours in assembly department. The expected prime costs per unit
are Shs. 670.
Required:
a) Allocate the support service costs to the production departments using the direct allocation
method.
b) What will be the bid for job K if the direct allocation method is used?
c) Allocate the service costs to the production departments using the sequential allocation
method.
d) What will be the bid for job K if the sequential allocation method is used?
e) Briefly explain the problems encountered in sett setting overhead cost standards.
f) Distinguish between cost allocation and cost apportionment

Solution:
(a) Overhead allocation (Direct method)

Shs. Shs. Shs. Shs.
Direct costs 1,000,000 500,000 1,000,000 2,000,000
Maintenance 500,000 500,000 (1,000,000) -
Power 1,600,000 400,000 - (2,000,000)
3,100,000 1,400,000 - -
3,100,000
(b) Overhead Allocation Rate = = Shs. 310/machine hour i.e. Maintenance
10,000
Department.
Job K cost statement
Shs.
Prime cost 670
Overhead (3 x 310) 930
Total unit cost 1,600
 Bid price Shs. 1,600 x 1.2 = Shs. 1,920
(c) Overhead allocation (sequential method)

Production Support departments
departments
Shs. Shs. Shs. Shs.
Direct costs 1,000,000 500,000 1,000,000 2,000,000
Power department 1,280,000 320,000 400,000 (2,000,000)
Maintenance 700,000 700,000 (1,400,000) -
department
2,980,000 1,520,000 - -
2,980,000
(d) Maintenance department Overhead Allocation Rate = = Shs. 298 per machine
10,000
hour.
Job K cost statement
Shs.
Prime cost 670
Overhead (3 x 298) 894
1,564
 Bid price Shs. 1,564 x 1.2 = Shs. 1,876.80

(e) Problems exist in setting overhead cost standards in three important areas, namely;
setting cost standards, selecting a standard overhead rate and determining the standard
volume for fixed overhead cost recovery.
The setting of cost standards implies that resources have been acquired at the best price
and that they have been used in the most efficient manner. Since overheads costs are not
directly related to products, the problem is selecting a measurement of activity that can be
used as a surrogate for the output expressed as product volume.
The selection of a standard overhead rate depends on which measurement of activity
should be used. Also, fixed overhead costs, unlike variable overhead costs, do not vary
with output.
(f) Cost allocation is the allotment of whole items of cost. Cost apportionment is the sharing
of a common cost amongst cost centres.
Workings
MMC Ltd.
(a) Power cost allocated according to maintenance hours
6,400 + 1,600 = 8,000
6,400
x2,000,000  1,600,000
8,000
1,600
x2,000,000  400,000
8,000
(b) Maintenance cost

Maintenance cost allocated according to employees
30 + 30 = 60
30
x1,000,000  500,000
60
30
x1,000,000  500,000
60
(c) Power
Apportioned according to machine hours
2,000 + 6,400 + 1,600 = 10,000

2,000
x2,000,000  400,000  Maintenance
10,000
6,400
x2,000,000  1,280,000  Grinding
10,000
1,600
x2,000,000  320,000  Assembly
10,000
Maintenance – Allocated according to number of employees
30
Grinding x1,400,000  700,000
60
30
Assembly x1,400,000  700,000
60

TOPIC 5
COST BOOKKEEPING
Introduction
Bookkeeping involves the recording, storing and retrieving of financial transactions for a
company, nonprofit organization, individual, etc.
Common financial transactions and tasks that are involved in bookkeeping include:
 Billing for goods sold or services provided to clients.

 Recording receipts from customers.
 Verifying and recording invoices from suppliers.
 Paying suppliers.
 Processing employees' pay and the related governmental reports.
 Monitoring individual accounts receivable.
 Recording depreciation and other adjusting entries.
 Providing financial reports.
Today bookkeeping is done with the use of computer software.

COST Book keeping refers to a system of recording various cost information in the books of
account. There two main systems of cost book keeping. That is:
1. Integrated cost accounting system - A system of accounting where the cost and
financial accounts are kept in the same set of books. This system avoids the need for
separate set of books for financial and costing purposes
2. Interlocking cost accounting system. - Interlocking accounting system; this is an

accounting system where separate cost accounting and financial
THE FLOW OF COSTS IN AN A BUSINESS ENTERPRISE
Flow of costs refers to the manner in which costs move through a firm. Typically, the flow of
costs is relevant to a manufacturing environment where accountants must quantify what costs are
in raw materials, work in process, finished goods inventory and cost of goods sold. Flow of costs
does not only apply to inventory, but also to factors in other processes to which a cost is attached
such as labor and overhead.

We say that costs flow through an accounting system. That is because they accumulate as the
product progresses through the various stages of production. Let's look at a typical product.
Before a product is started, no costs have been incurred. Workers stand ready to make the
product, inventory waits patiently in the warehouse, and the manufacturing plant contains all the
resources necessary to perform the manufacturing operation.
We first add materials into production, from the inventory. At the same time the accounting
department transfers the cost of inventory items to the Work in Process account, and the product
or job now has a value.
Next the workers start to convert the raw inventory into a product. As labor is added, the
accounting department transfers payroll costs to the Work in Process account, increasing the
value of the product or job.
Overhead costs are allocated to the product or job, based on the costing method used. As work
progresses on the product or job, it accumulates labor, materials and overhead costs. Finally, the
total finished product or job cost is transferred to Finished Goods, and when it is sold the cost is
transferred to cost of goods sold
COST BOOK KEEPING – INTERLOCKING AND INTEGRATED LEDGER SYSTEMS
There are two systems of cost book keeping

1. Non- integrated/inter locking system
2. Integrated system
INTERLOCKING LEDGER SYSTEMS
Interlocking accounting system is a system in which company records his transactions on the
basis of financial accounting principles and cost accounting principles separately. It means, there
will be two records of accounts. One is financial accounts record and second is cost accounts
record.
Features of Interlocking Accounting System
1. In interlocking accounting system, two set of accounts are prepared.

2. In interlocking accounting system, all big organisation, take benefits of cost accounts
separately from financial accounts. So, it can more control on cost.
3. In interlocking accounting ledger, cost accounts are maintained in cost ledger and
financial accounts are maintain in financial ledger.

Advantages of Interlocking Accounting System
Main benefit of interlocking accounting system is for big companies. Big companies keep double
record by independent accountants. So, there is less chance of fraud and mistake because in
reconciliation process, such fraud and mistake can be found by auditor. So, both cost and
financial accountants will be more careful about this.
Disadvantages of Interlocking Accounting System

1. Because we keep double set of accounts, so there is more need of reconciliation of cost
and financial accounts for finding the reason of not matching cost accounts records with
financial accounts records. So, this time may be saved in integrated accounting system.
2. This is costly system because we need separate accounting staff for keeping separate set
of two accounts.
3. Sometime, all the users of our accounting records may be confused by seeing cost profit
and financial profit in our interlocking accounting system.
INTEGRATED LEDGER SYSTEMS
This is a system where cost accounts and financial accounts are combined in one set of accounts.
Features/Advantages
In integrated account, ledger system has a number of features which may be viewed as preferable
to the interlocking ledger system. In the recent decade, there has in fact been a movetowards
greater integration of accounting information requirements in a single unified system (an
integrated ledger system).
Such an integrated ledger system has the following advantages
1. Only one set of account is maintained and therefore there would be one profit results
hence no need of reconciling.
2. There is no duplication of work hence a saving in clerical cost.
3. Information obtained can be used by the management for decision making as well as for
financial reporting purposes.
4. Integrated account system help to coordinate the various forms of an organization.
5. It facilitates the use of IT systems.
6. Cost data can be obtained without delay as cost accounts are posted directly from the
basics of original entry.

Disadvantages
1) Differences in the valuation of stock – In financial accounting stock is valued base on the
lower of cost and net realizable value whole in cost accounting stock is valued based on the
input cost. The difference in the valuation often brings a challenge in integrated accounts.
2) Problems associated with items appearing in cost accounting only e.g. overhead absorption,
notion cost and changing of depreciation based on the usage.
Items of expenditure that is unique to the two systems of accounting.
i. Appropriations of profits not dealt within the costing systems e.g. corporations tax,
dividends paid and proposed etc.
ii. Expenditure of a purely financial nature (i.e. nothing to do with manufacturing e.g. losses
on sale of fixed assets, interest on bank loans, bank charges etc.
In the financial Systems, the required ledgers are:
a) The General Ledger

b) Debtors Ledger (or Sales ledger)
c) Creditors Ledger (or Purchases ledger)
In the cost book-keeping system, the required ledgers are:
i) General Ledger Adjustment Account: It is sometimes called the cost ledger account.
ii) All the items extracted from the financial account are recorded in this account. The
balance in this account represents the total of all the balances of the impersonal accounts
extracted from the financial books. It completes the double entry in the cost accounts.
iii) Stores Ledger Control Account: This account shows all the transaction of materials e.g.
purchases, issuance of materials, returns to suppliers, etc. The balance of this account
represents in total the detailed balance of the stores account.
iv) Work in Progress Ledger Control Account: It shows the total work in progress at any
particular time.
v) Finished Goods Ledger Control Account: Receipts from production and transfer to
distribution department are entered in this account and the balance of this account shows
the total value of finished goods in stock.
vi) Production Overheads Control Account: It gives the total production overheads
incurred in the manufacture or production of goods in question.
vii) Wages Control Account: It shows the total wages incurred in the production of goods.

viii) Selling and Distribution Overheads Control Accounts: It gives the overheads incurred
in marketing the goods produced. Examples of such costs will include advertising costs,
sales commission, repairs made to the distribution van etc.
ix) Administrative Overheads Control Accounts: This will give the total of administrative
overheads incurred in the organization. These costs are not related to production. Such
costs will include salary to the general manager, salary to accounts department staff
Link between Cost and Financial Books
The link between the two sets of books is achieved by operating a cost ledger control account
and a financial ledger control account (Cost Ledger Contra Account) in the financial and cost
books respectively. In the cost ledger control account, all the items which affect the costs
accounts are recorded, the same items are recorded in the financial ledger control accounts, but
on the opposite side of the account hence the account completes the double entry. The Cost
Ledger
Control Account is just a memorandum entry and is, therefore, made in addition to the normal
entries in the financial books of account.
Difference between Integrated and Interlocking system
Integrated and interlocking system is two cost book keeping methods. Interlocking system
maintains two set of ledger which allows detail analyses of costs and cost related processes.
Integrated system keeps only one set of ledgers and both financial and cost accounting
information needs are met from the same books.
1. Duplication of record
In Integrated system there is no duplication of record due to single set of ledgers where in
interlocking system there is duplication of record due to two set of ledgers.
2. Cost
Interlocking system require more resources than integrated system. More time is required to
maintain the interlocking system similarly interlocking system requires more human effort than
integrated system. More resources require more cost therefore interlocking system is deemed to
be more costly than integrated system.
3. Detailed analyses
Interlocking system allows more detail analyses of cost and other cost related process. These
analyses can be performed without any difficulty and delay due to separate set of ledger.

4. Avoid confusion
Interlocking system creates much confusion due to two set of ledger and too much information is
being produced from different record and therefore the information management is more difficult
in interlocking system. In integrated system this confusion can be avoided.
5. Computerized environment
Integrated system is the only system followed in computerized environment and detail cost
analyses are controlled through coding system (Charts of accounts). Interlocking system has no
relevance in the computerized system
DOUBLE ENTRY SYSTEM IN INTEGRATED A/C
To record purchase on materials
Dr: stores control/raw materials A/C

Cr: Bank/creditors A/C
To record materials returned to suppliers
Dr: Suppliers/Creditors
Cr: Stores control/Raw materials
To issue materials to production
Dr: Work in progress A/C Direct materials

Dr: Production overhead A/C- (for indirect materials)
Cr: Stores control A/C
To record wages
Dr: Wages A/C

Cr: Bank/Wages payable A/C
To change wages in production
Dr: Work in progress A/C (Direct wages)

Dr Production wages A/C (Indirect wages)
Cr: Wages A/C

To record manufacturing expenses
Dr: Production OHDs A/C

Cr: Bank/Expenses payable A/C
To change overheads to production
Dr. Work in progress A/C

Cr: Production OHD A/C
N/B
If the actual overheads is different from the OHD absorbed there is a case of over or under
absorption and the difference should be posted to in OHD adjustment A/C and later transferred
to the part A/C
To record the cost of goods produced
Dr: Finished goods A/C

Cr: Work in progress A/C
To record the cost of goods sold
Dr: Cost of sales A/C

Cr: Finished goods A/C
To record sales
Dr: Bank/Debtors A/C
Cr: Sales A/C
Illustration
Bora Ltd. Commenced its operations on 1 march 2005 with a fully paid up issued share capital of
Sh.500,000 represented by fixed assets of Sh.275,000 and cash at bank of Sh.225,000. The
company has two departments; A and B.
As at 30 may 2005, the following transactions had taken place:

1. Credit purchases from suppliers amounted to Sh.573, 500 of which Sh.525, 000 were in
respect of raw materials and Sh.48, 500 were in respect of purchases classified in the ledger
accounts as production overhead items.
2. Production overhead costs absorbed in the period were:

Sh.
Department A 110,000
Department B 120,000
3. The following overhead costs were paid out by cheque:
Sh.
Administration cost 25,000
Production overheads costs 20,000
Selling costs 40,000
4. Issues of raw materials from the stores were as follows:

Sh.
 Department: A 180,000
:B 192,500
372,500
 Production overhead items totaled Sh. 65,000.
5. The amount of staff wages was Sh.675, 000, Sh.500, 000 was paid out in cash while Sh.175,
000 still owed.
6. The staff wages were analyzed as follows:
Sh.
Work in progress department A 300,000
Work in progress department B 260,000
Administration overheads 25,000
Production overheads item 42,500
Selling overheads 47,500
675,000
7. Accruals as at 30 May 2005 were Sh.26, 000 for security of productions facilities and Sh.39,
000 for consultancy on production procedures.
8. The costs of finished goods were:
Sh.
Department: A 570,000
Department : B 555,000
9. Sales on credit amounted to Sh. 870,000 and the cost of these credit sales was Sh. 700,000.
10. Depreciation on production plant and equipment was Sh. 15,000.
11. Cash received from debtors totaled Sh. 520,000 and payments made to creditors
totaledSh.150,000.
Required:
(i). Using integrated cost accounting system, record the above transactions for the three
months ended 30 May 2005.

(ii). Profit and loss account for the period ended 30 May 2005 and balance sheet as at 30 May
2005.
Solution
a) i)
Fixed assets a/c Selling overhead a/c
Sh. Sh. Sh. Sh.
Bal b/d 275,000 Bal c/d 275,000 Bank 40,000 P & L 87,500
275,000 275,000 Wages 47,500
87,500 87,500
Creditors a/c Stores a/c

Sh. Sh. Sh. Sh.
Bank 150,000 Stores 525,000 Creditors 525,000 WIP: A 180,000
Bal c/d 488,500 Production B 192,000
Overhead 48,500 Production
Production Overhead 65,000
Overhead 65,000 Bal c/d 87,500
638,500 638,500 525,000 525,000
Cash book Production overhead a/c

Sh. Sh. Sh. Sh.
Bal b/d 225,000 Wages 500,000 Creditors 48,500 WIP: A 110,000
Debtors 520,000 Creditors 150,000 Depreciation 15,000 B 120,000
Overheads: Bank 20,000 P&L 26,000
Production 20,000 Stores 65,000
Selling 40,000 Wages 42,500
Administration 25,000 Creditors 65,000
Bal c/d 10,000 256,000 256,000
745,000 745,000
Wages a/c Administration overhead a/c

Sh. Sh. Sh. Sh.
Bank 500,000 WIP: A 300,000 Bank 25,000 P&L 50,000
B 260,000 Wages 25,000
Overhead 50,000 50,000
Production 42,500
Selling 47,500
Administration 25,000
675,000 675,000

WIP A a/c WIP B a/c
Sh. Sh. Sh. Sh.
Finished Finished
Stores 180,000 570,000 Stores 192,500 555,000
goods goods
Wages 300,000 Bal c/d 20,000 Wages 260,000 Bal c/d 17,500
Production Production
110,000 120,000
overhead Overhead
590,000 590,000 572,500 572,500
Debtors Depreciation
Sh. Sh. Sh. Sh.
Sales 870,000 Bank 520,000 Bal c/d 15,000 Production
Bal c/d 350,000 Overhead 15,000
870,000 870,000 15,000 15,000
ii)
Profit and Loss Account for the period ended 30 May 2005
Sh. Sh.
700,000 Sales 870,000
Cost of sales 170,000
Gross profit 870,000 870,000
Gross profit 170,000

Administration cost
cost 50,000
Selling cost 87,500
Production expenses 26,000
Net profit 6,500
170,000 170,000
Balance sheet as at 30 May 2005

Sh. Sh.
Fixed assets 260,000 Capital 500,000
Finished goods 425,000 Profit 6,500
WIP: A 20,000 Creditors 488,500
B 17,000 Wages Owings 175,000
Debtors 350,000
Bank 10,000
Stores 87,500
1,170,000 1,170,000

Causes of Difference between Financial Accounting and Cost Accounting Profits Results
 Purely financial expenses e.g. bud debts, discount allowed, interest expenses, losses on
disposals of assets etc.
 Purely financial incomes e.g. dividends received, gain on sale of assets, decrease in provision
for bad and doubtful debts etc.
 Appropriation of profits e.g. dividend paid, transfer to reserved, tax
 Differences in the valuation of stock
 Differences in depreciation charged.
 Notional cost appearing in cost accounting
 Over under absorption of overheads in cost accounting
 Timing differences
REVISION EXERCISE
QUESTION ONE
More Ltd. is a medium size manufacturing company and it maintains separate cost and financial
accounting books. The financial accountant provided the following statement for the year ended
31 March 2004.
More Ltd
Manufacturing, trading and profit and loss account for the year ended 31 March 2004
Sh. Sh.
Direct materials
Opening stock 150,000
Add: purchases 1,800,000
1,950,000
Less: closing stock 200,000
Direct materials cost 1,750,000
Add: direct wages 250,000
Prime cost 2,000,000
Add: factory overheads 300,000
2,300,000
Add: opening work-in-progress 125,000
2,425,000
Production cost carried forward 2,295,000
Sales 4,500,000
Less cost of goods sold
Opening stock 240,000
Production cost brought forward 2,295,000
2,535,000

Gross profit 2,280,000
2,220,000
Other incomes
Discount received 45,000
Income from investment 1,094,000 1,139,000
3,359,000
Expenses
Depreciation 280,000
Interest on loan 36,000
Debenture interest 25,000
Administration expenses 600,000 941,000
Net profit 2,418,000
The records from cost accounts showed the following:

1. Stock valuation as at 31 March were as follows:
2003 2004
Sh. Sh.
Raw materials 160,000 196,000
Work-in-progress 121,000 125,000
Finished goods 258,000 260,000
2. Factory overheads were absorbed at 15% of direct material costs.

3. Other costs included:
Sh.
Interest on capital 140,000
Notional rent 420,000
Administration over absorbed 32,000
Selling and distribution over 25,000
absorbed 242,000
Depreciation
4. Profit as per cost was Sh. 2,328,400
Required:
Prepare a profit reconciliation statement for the year ended 31 March 2004. (20 marks)
Solution:
Workings:
Cost Financial Difference
Sh. Sh. Sh.
Opening stock of raw materials 160,000 150,000 10,000

Opening stock of work in progress 121,000 125,000 4,000
Opening stock of finished goods 258,000 240,000 18,000
Closing stock of raw materials 196,000 200,000 4,000
Closing stock of work in progress 125,000 130,000 5,000
Closing stock of finished goods 260,000 255,000 5,000
Factory overheads 262,500 300,000 37,500
Discount received - 45,000 45,000
Income from investment - 1,094,000 1,094,000
Depreciation 242,000 280,000 38,000
Interest on loan (expenses) - 36,000 36,000
Debenture interest - 25,000 25,000
Administration expense 632,000 600,000 32,000
Interest on capital (not) 140,000 - 140,000
Notional rent 420,000 - 420,000
Profit reconciliation statement for the year ended 31 March 2004

Shs. Shs.
Net profits as per financial account 2,418,000
Add: Depreciation in financial accounts 280,000
Interest on loan 36,000
Overstatement in opening stock of work in 4,000
progress 5,000
Understatement in closing stock of finished 37,500 387,500
goods 2,805,500
Overstatement in factory overheads 32,000
25,000
Less: Over absorbed administration expense 242,000
Selling and distribution overhead applied 45,000
Depreciation in cost accounts 1,094,000
Income from investment 18,000
Understatement in opening stock of raw 4,000
materials 5,000 1,475,000
Understatement in opening stock of finished 4,280,500
goods
Overstatement in closing stock of raw materials
Overstatement in closing stock of work in
progress
Note: Notional charges in cost accounts should be ignored.

ALTERNATIVE
RECONCILIATION STATEMENT
Shs. Shs.
Profit as per cost accounts 2,328,400
Add: Overabsorbed Adm. 32,000

Overabsorbed S/D 25,000
Income Invest 1,094,000
Opening stock Raw Materials 10,000
Opening stock Finished goods 18,000
Closing stock Raw Materials 4,000
Closing stock Work in progress 5,000 1,233,000
Less: Depreciation 38,000

Loan interest 36,000
Opening stock work in progress 4,000
Closing stock finished goods 5,000
Overheads 37,500 (145,500)
Profit as per final accounts 3,415,900

TOPIC 6
COSTING METHODS
Introduction
Manufacturing costing methods are accounting techniques that are used to help understand the
value of inputs and outputs in a production process. By tracking and categorizing this
information according to a rigorous accounting system, corporate management can determine
with a high degree of accuracy the cost per unit of production and other key performance
indicators. Management needs this information in order to make informed decisions about
production levels, pricing, competitive strategy, future investment, and a host of other concerns.
Such information is primarily necessary for internal use, or managerial accounting.
JOB ORDER COSTING
Job order costing or job costing is a system for assigning manufacturing costs to an individual
product or batches of products. Generally, the job order costing system is used only when the
products manufactured are sufficiently different from each other. (When products are identical or
nearly identical, the process costing system will likely be used.)
Since there is a significant variation in the products manufactured, the job order costing system
will create a job cost record for each item, job or special order. The job cost record will report
the direct materials and direct labor actually used plus the manufacturing overhead assigned to
each job.
An example of an industry where job order costing is used is the building construction industry
since each building is unique. The manufacturers of custom equipment or custom cabinetry are
also examples of companies that will keep track of production costs by item or job.
The job cost records also serve as the subsidiary ledger or documentation for the cost of the
work-in-process inventory, the finished goods inventory, and the cost of goods sold.
ACCOUNTING FOR JOB ORDER COSTING
The following journal entries relate to material procurement and issue from the store to the
production process.

1. (a) Direct materials purchase
Dr Stores ledger control A/c XX
Cr Cash A/c XX
To record cash purchases
Dr Stores ledger control A/ c XX

Cr Creditors A/ c - for credit purchasers XX
To record credit purchases
(b) Return of materials to suppliers

Dr Cash A/ c or creditors control A/ c XX
Cr Stores ledger control A/ c XX
To record return of materials to suppliers
(c) Issue of materials from the store

Dr W.I.P. Control A/c X
Cr stores ledger control A/c for direct materials. XX
To record issue of direct materials from the store
Dr Factory overheads control A/ c XX

Cr Stores ledger control A/ c XX
To record issue of indirect materials from the store
Labour cost is measured and accumulated in the same way as material cost. It includes both
direct and indirect labour. Direct labour can be traced directly to the individual job where as
indirect labour cannot or if it has to be traced, it can only be done with expenditure of great
effort.
Labour costs are accumulated based on the time tickets prepared by workers. The worker needs
to indicate the duration of time he/she spent on a specific job or, when not assigned to a specific
job, what type of indirect labour task he was assigned to and the amount of time expended on the
task.
Total labour costs are calculated based on the time sheets submitted at the end of the day by all
the workers. An example of a time ticket is shown below STING

Below are the journal entries passed to record direct and indirect labour.
2. (a) Direct Labor

Dr W.I.P. Control A/e XX
Cr Cash a/c XX
To record direct labour Paid in cash
(b) Accrued Direct Wages
Dr W.I.P. Control Ale XX
Cr Wages Control Ale XX
To record direct wages to be paid (accruing at a specific)
(c) Indirect Wages
Dr Factory overheads control AI c XX
Cr Wages Control Alc XX
To record indirect wages (labour cost) incurred
Production overheads go along with direct materials and direct labour in determining the cost per
unit or in batch processing or the cost of a particular job. However, it is difficult to
assignmanufacturing overheads because they cannot be traced directly to a particular job and it
consists of many unlike items with the variable and fixed cost components with fixed cost
constituting a large part of manufacturing overheads. Overheads are, therefore, assigned to units
of production through an allocation process.
The following journal entries are passed to record production overheads allocated for a
job.
3. Production Overheads
(i) (Not yet paid) Dr Factory overhead control A/ c XX

Cr Expenses/Creditor control A/c XX
To record unpaid production overheads
(ii) (When paid) Dr Expense / creditors Ale XX

Cr Cash A/c XX
To record payment of production overheads
After the allocation of manufacturing overheads, total cost for a job can then be determined and
summarized in a job Cost Sheet or job cost account. Examples of the above are shown below

OTHER TRANSACTIONS
4. Finished goods transferred to the store:

Dr Finished goods stock control A/c XX
Cr W.I.P Control A/c XX
To record transfer of finished goods to the store
5. Sale delivery of finished goods to customers:

(i) On Credit: Dr Debtors control A/c XX
Cr Sales A/c XX
To record credit sales
(ii) In Cash: Dr Bank/Cash A/c XX

Cr (Sales A/c XX
To record cash sales
6. Cost of goods sold to customers:

Dr Cost of sales A/c XX
Cr Finished goods control A/c XX
To record cost of goods sold to customers
7. (i) When there is over absorption of production overheads:
Dr Factory overheads control A/c XX
Cr P & L A/c XX
To record over absorption of production overheads
(ii) When there is under absorption of production overheads:

Dr P& L A/c XXX
Cr Factory overheads control A/c XXX
To record under absorption of production overheads
8. When there are non-manufacturing overheads:

Dr P & L A/c XXX
Cr Non-manufacturing overheads control A/c XXX
or
Non-manufacturing overheads/expenses are regarded as period costs & are therefore not changed
To W.I.P control A/c.
Note: Overheads entries apply when there is an interlocking accounting system.

Illustration
At the start of the year, no jobs were in process. During the year, job no 2.1, 2.2 and 2.3
werestarted; materials were purchased at a cost of Shs.100,000. Materials worth Shs.75,000 were
used of which Shs.70,000 were direct. (Shs.10,000 on job 2.1, Shs.40,000 on job 2.2 and the
balance on job no.2.3). Labour costs worth Shs.250,000 were incurred of which Shs.220,000 was
direct labour (Shs.80,000 on job 2.1, Shs.75,000 on job 2.2 and the balance on job 2.3).
Other manufacturing overhead costs of Shs.72,800 were incurred; manufacturing overhead is
applied to production on the basis of direct labour costs. Estimated manufacturing overhead for
the year was Shs.100,000 and estimated direct labour cost for the year was Shs.200,000. Jobs 2.2
and 2.3 were completed with job 2.3 being sold for Shs.200,000
Required:
a) Pass the necessary journal entries to record the above transactions.
b) Prepare a costing profit and loss account for the period above.
Solution
Dr Cr
SHS SHS
1 Materials 100,000
Cash 100,000
2 Work in Progress 70,000
Manufacturing overheads 5,000
Materials 75,000
3 Factory Labour 250,000
Cash 250,000
To record labour costs incurred
4 Work in progress 220,000
Factory labour 250,000
5 Manufacturing overheads 72,800
Cash 72,800
6 Work in Progress (see working below) 110,000

Applied manufacturing overhead 110,000
To record applied overheads
7 Finished goods; Job 2.2 152,500

Finished goods; job 2.3 117,500
Work in Progress 270,000
To record transfer of jobs to finished
goods
8 Cash 200,000
Sales 200,000

To record sale of job 2.3
9 Cost of goods sold 117,500

Finished goods 117,500
To record transfer of job 2.3 to cost of
sales
10 Applied manufacturing overheads 110,000

Cost of sales 2,200
To record over absorbed overheads
Costing profit and loss account

SHS SHS SHS
Sales 200,000
Cost of goods sold
Opening stock of work in progress(WIP) - -
Opening stock of raw materials - -
Add: direct material cost 70,000
Direct labour cost 220,000
Applied overheads 110,000 400,000
400,000
Less: Closing Raw materials 0
Closing W.I.P (130,000)
Cost of goods manufactured 270,000
Add Opening Finished goods inventory 0
Goods available for sale 270,000
Less Closing Finished goods inventory (152,500)
Cost of goods sold 117,500
Over applied overheads (2,200)
Cost of goods sold 115,300
Profit for the period 82,500
Note: The cost of goods sold as computed above is the same as computed below when various
costs are accumulated as shown in the table.

Working
Overheads absorption rate = Estimated manufacturing overheads
Estimated direct labor cost
= Shs.100,000× 100%
Shs.200,000
= 50%
Therefore, total manufacturing costs absorbed = 50% × total direct labour cost
= 50% ×220,000 = 110,000
COSTING
Accumulated costs of jobs;
Direct Direct labour Applied Total Cost
materials overheads
Job no 2.1 10,000 80,000 40,000 130,000
Job no 2.2 40,000 75,000 37,500 152,500
Job no 2.3 20,000 65,000 32,500 117,500
BATCH COSTING
This is a form of costing which is used where a quantity of identical articles are produced
together as a batch. The general procedures are very similar to costing jobs. The batch would be
treated as a job during manufacture and the various costs (material, labour and overheads)
collected in the usual manner. On completion of the batch the total batch cost would be divided
by the number of good articles produced so as to provide the average cost per article. Batch
costing procedures are common in a variety of industries including; clothing, footwear,
engineering components.
Illustration
The budgeted variable overheads of Githurai Ltd for the year 2001 are given as below:
Department Overhead (Shs) Absorption base
A 150,000 15,000 direct labour hours

B 200,000 25,000 direct labour hours
C 120,000 20,000 direct labour hours
D 300,000 30,000 machine labour hours

Additional information
1. Selling and administering overheads are charged at 10% of total production costs while the
profit markup is 25% of total costs:
2. An order for 2,000 units was received from a customer. The batch number of this orderis
510. The following additional information in respect of this batch is provided below:
 Direct materials - 87,000/ =
 Direct Labor - Dept A (150 direct labor hrs) @ Shs.12. per hour.
- Dept B (40 direct labor hrs) @ Shs.15 per hr
- Dept C (60 direct labor hrs) @ Shs.20 per hr
- Dept D (100 direct labor hrs) @ Shs.10 per hr
 A total of 50 machine hours were used in this job
Required: Calculate:
a) Total cost of the batch
b) Cost/Unit
c) Selling Price of the batch
d) Selling Price unit.
Solution
Direct Materials Direct labour Manufacturing overheads

Item Total Ticket Labour hrs Total Base of Rate Total
Code Cost Cost absorption Per
hr
N 87,000 Dept A 150 @Sh12 1800 Direct labour hr 10 1500
Dept B 40 @Sh15 600 Direct labour hr 8 320
Dept B 60 @Sh20 1200 Direct labour hr 6 360
- Dept C 100 @Sh10 1000 Machine hr 10 500
Totals 87,000 4,600 2,680
Cost Summary:
Shs.
Direct materials 87,000
Direct Labour 4,600
Manufacturing Overheads 2,680
Total Production Cost 94,280
Selling and admin costs (10%) 9,428
Total cost of Batch 103,708

(a) Total cost of the batch Shs.103, 708
(b) Cost per unit

= Total cost of the batch = Sh.103, 708 = Shs.51.86 per unit
Total no of units 2,000 Units
(c) Selling price of the batch; Cost plus 25% markup
Shs
Cost of the Batch 103,708
Mark up @ 25% 25,927
Selling Price of the Batch 129,635
Selling price per unit

= Selling Price of the Batch= Sh.129, 635 = Shs.64.82 per unit
Total no of units2,000 Units
PROCESS COSTING
This is a product costing method applicable where similar products are produced continuously in
a series of production steps commonly known as processes.
It is used where production is continuous in a series of production steps and similar products are
produced.
This is a costing method that is applied where there are standard operations with continuous
production of homogeneous and identical units. Products are produced in the same manner and
consume the same amount of material and labour. The output is the final product of a sequence
of operations. In this type of costing, costs are accumulated on the basis of process, and
individual units of output are thus assigned the average cost per unit. The cost per unit is arrived
at by dividing the total process costs by the number of input of the next process and further
materials can be added at each stage production. Therefore, cost per unit for the second and
subsequent processes is a cumulative cost. For example, the cost per unit for the output
transferred from process 2 is the cost of production for both process 1 and 2 and not for process 2
above.
Common features
1. Similar units are produced continuously
2. The continuous nature of production results in some units being incomplete at the end of
the period.
3. Loss is a common feature due to spoilage, wastage, evaporation etc.
4. Costs cannot be identified with individual products.
5. In some cases output may be multiple products.

Definitions
a) Process losses
This represents loss of material due to spoilage, evaporation which arises due to the nature of the
product processes.
Process uses can be categorized into:-
i) Normal loss: This is the expected losses and they are unavoidable. They are cost by
inherent factors to production processes e.g. evaporation.
Normal loss is based on past experiences and indicates the expected loss under normal
working conditions.
No cost is allocated to normal loss. However, any amount realised from sale of normal
loss units reduces the cost of good output in unit cost calculation.
ii) Abnormal loss
These are extra units lost above the normal loss units.
It arises due to unfavourable working conditions i.e. substandard materials, accidents,
carelessness etc.
It carries its own cost and will be valued a good unit and the amount transferred to P&L
iii) Abnormal gain
This represents the expected loss transferred out as good output.
They are units which were expected to be loss but they were not lost.
It arises due to improved working conditions i.e. high quality material, less accidents
etc.
It is also accounted at the cost of good output.
b) Scrap
These are the discarded materials with some recovery value which is either disposed of
without further processing or can be reintroduced in place of raw materials.
c) Waste
These are discarded substance with no recovery value and normally they are disposed at a
cost i.e. a cost is incurred to dispose the waste. This cost is treated as part of process cost for
the process which generated the waste.
Accounting for processes

Process costing is centered on four key steps.
The exact volume of work done in each step will depend on whether there are losses, W.I.P, joint
and by-products etc. These steps includes:-
i) Determination of inputs and outputs
ii) Calculating cost per unit and outputs
iii) Calculating the total cost of outputs
iv) Computing the necessary accounts

The procedure for process costing is as follows;-
The production factory is divided into a number of processes.
 An account is opened and maintained for each process.
 Each process account is debited with materials, labor, direct expenses and
overheadsapportioned to the process.
 The good output of a process is transferred as input to the next process. At the endof the
period, the products will include various items. These are normal loss, abnormalloss,
finished goods (or output to the next process) and work in progress.
 The finished output of the last process is transferred to the finished goods account.
Process costing with presence of process losses and gains

Losses in a process are a common feature and they should be well accounted because they have
an impact on production cost.
Most manufacturing processes result in some portion of the raw materials used not being
converted into a reliable half hence losses. These losses may take the form of waste, scrap,
rework, and spoilt units.
Waste: are materials lost in the process, which are irrecoverable or have no recoverable value.
The term also refers to discarded substances having no value and is disposed off
Scrap: Material held after a productive process, which are irrecoverable or have no recoverable
value. The term also refers to discarded materials, which have some recoverable value which is
usually either disposed off without further treatment, or reintroduced into the production process
in place of the raw materials. Scraps are process losses that can be sold for some small value.
Rework: These are finished goods that do not meet quality standards but which with some
additional work can be sold.
287
Loss: Refers to finished or partially finished units, which cannot be reworked or used for their
intended purpose. They may be discarded or sold for minimal value. There are two types of
spoilage;
i. Normal Loss: is loss expected and unavoidable even under the most efficient systems of
production. Normal spoilage cost is normally included in product cost.
ii. Abnormal Spoilage: This is loss that is avoidable with efficient operating conditions.
The cost is regarded as controllable and can be eradicated if due diligence and supervision are
exercised. The cost is normally treated as a loss and charged to profit and loss account.
Normal loss
Cost of normal loss is absorbed by the cost of good units.
Normal losses are unavoidable costs that are expected to occur under efficient operating
conditions. They are inherent in the production process and cannot be eliminated or controlled.

Illustration
1000 kgs at sh.3.60/kg were input to a process and there was a 10% loss due to evaporation.
900 good units should result and their cost per unit would be:
1000 × sh.3.60/900 = sh.4/unit.
The level of normal loss selected as being the standard for the period under review is based on
various factors such as past experience, quality control records from the past periods and
industry norms. These costs are assigned to the good output using two approaches;
(a) Recognition and Re-Assignment Approach In this approach, the normal spoilage is
included in the equivalent units computation; further, the normally spoilt units will be assigned
costs just like any other unit. The spoilage costs will then be reallocated to these good units that
have passed the inspection point. The steps to follow under this method are:
i) Compute equivalent units including normal spoilage.
ii) Assign costs to all units including normal spoilage.
iii) Reassign normal spoilage costs to good output.
Illustration
ABC Ltd. produces and sells a certain type of insecticide, YMX. In the year just ended, ABC
material input into production process I was 2000 units at Shs.10 per unit. Labour costs incurred
amounted to Shs.30,000 while overhead costs absorbed amounted to 20,000. The normal loss in
the process is 5%. Compute the cost of spoilage and the cost per unit of output transferred to
process II after reassigning the normal loss costs.
Solution
(The process I account will help us solve the problem)
Process I Account
Materials 2,000 20,000 Transferred to process 1,900 66,500
II
Labour cost 30,000 Normal loss 100 3,500
Overhead cost 20,000 -
70,000 70,000
Cost per unit = Shs.70,000/2,000 units = Shs.35 per unit
Reassigning of costs to the good units

= 3500/1900 per good unit = Shs.1.84 (2.d.p)
Therefore, cost per good unit shall be Shs. (35 + 1.84) = Shs.36.84

(b)Omission Approach: Under this approach, the normally spoilt units are not included in the
calculation of equivalent units. This means that the cost of the normally spoilt units will
automatically be distributed to the good output. By excluding the normal spoilage in the
computation to the good output, a lower figure will be derived. This is the most commonly used
method of accounting for normal losses. The weaknesses of this method are;
i) The cost of normal spoilage is spread equally into the finished goods and the ending W.I.P
regardless of whether the ending W.I.P. has passed the inspection stage or not.
ii) It does not allow the manager to see the costs of spoilage because these costs are not
computed.
Using the illustration above
Solution
The process I account will appear as follows
Process 1 Account
Materials 2,000 20,000 Normal loss (5%) 100 -
Labour cost 30,000 Transferred to process II 1,900 70,000
Overhead 20,000 -
cost 70,000 70,000
The cost per unit of the good units shall be computed using the formula given below
Cost per unit = Total accumulated cost
Expected output
Expected output = Total input (units) – Normal loss (Units)

Thus the cost per unit of production transferred shall be
= Cost per unit = Shs.70,000= Shs.3.684
95% ×20,000 units
The situation above exists where normal loss with no scrap value exists. There are instances
where the normal loss will have a scrap value. For instance, in the Jua Kali industry, the metal
scraps may be used to mend patches or be sold out for some other use. In this case, the revenue
obtained from the sale of scrap is offset against costs incurred in the production process to arrive
at the total costs to be allocated to each unit. In accounting terms, the cashbook is debited with
the amount received from the sale of scrap and the process account is credited with the
equivalent.

Illustration
1,000 kgs at sh.4.00/kg were input to a process and there was a 20% loss due to filtration. The
materials filtered out could be sold for sh.0.50kg.
Required;
Prepare a process account.
Solution
800 good units should result and their cost per unit would be:
1,000 × 4 – 200 ×0.50= sh.4.875/unit

800
Process account
Units Sh. Units Sh.
Material 1,000 4,000 Normal loss 200@ sh.0.5 100
- - To finished goods 800@ sh.4.875 3,900
1,000 4,000 1,000 4,000
Abnormal losses
Abnormal losses and gains carry their own costs and will be valued at the cost of good output.
They are separately analyzed and the amount to P&L.
These costs do not add any production benefit to the company and are treated as accounting
losses. They are controllable losses which are not expected to occur under efficient operating
conditions e.g. improper mixing of ingredients, omission of some important chemical in the
manufacture of a product, etc. Abnormal losses are considered to result from production
inefficiencies that should be eliminated and are not an inherent part of the production process.
The cost of abnormal spoilage not included in the process cost nor included in inventory
valuation but reported separately as abnormal is written off directly as losses for the period in
which it occur.
Abnormal losses, just as normal losses, may or may not have a scrap value. Abnormal loss with
or without scrap value is treated in a similar way in the process account. The sales revenue
received from sale of abnormal loss units is offset against the cost of abnormal loss in the
abnormal loss account to arrive at the net abnormal loss that shall be charged to the profit and
loss account in the period in which it arises.
Abnormal gain
In some instances, the actual output may be greater than expected or, put in other words, actual
loss less than normal or expected. In such circumstances, abnormal gains are considered to have
arisen.

The main objective of preparing the process account is to determine the cost per unit of expected
output (Normal output).
In a case where abnormal gains have no scrap value, (i.e. where if scrapped would not have a
value) the cost per expected output
= Input cost
Expected output
Illustration
In August 2000 kgs of a material were introduced to a process at a cost of sh.6/kg, and 200 hours
labor were spent at a cost of sh.15/hour. Overheads are absorbed at the rate of sh.4/ labour hour.
Normal losses are incurred at the rate of 5% of input and lost units can be sold for sh.0.9 per
Kilogram. 1,800 kgs were produced.
Required;-
Calculate the total absorption cost of the good output, the treatment of any abnormally lost or
gained units, and also show the process account and loss account.
Solution
Input costs less sale of normal loss = (2,000 ×sh.6) + (200 ×sh.15) + (200 ×sh. 4) – 100 × 0.9 =
15,710
Expected output = 2,000 × 0.95 = 1,900 (actual output = 1,800; abnormal loss = 100).
. ,
Cost per unit = ,
= sh.8.2684
Process account
Units Sh. Units Sh.
Material 2,000 12,000 To finished goods 1,800 @ 8.2684 14,883
Labour 3,000 Normal loss: sale of
Overheads 800 scrap [email protected] 90
- - Abnormal loss 100@ 8.2684 827
2000 15,800 2,000 15,800
Normal loss account

Units Sh. Units Sh.
Process account 100 90 Cash 100 90
- -
90 90

Abnormal loss account
Units Sh. Units Sh.
Process account 100 827 Cash 100 90
- Income
- statement 737
827 827
The net cost of the abnormally lost units is Sh.737.
Illustration
In May 5000 kgs of a material were introduced to a process at a cost of sh.9/kg, and labour and
overheads amounting to sh.25, 000 were also contributed.
Normal losses are incurred at the rate of 10% of input and lost units can be sold for sh.1 per
kilogram 4,700 kgs were produced
Calculate the total absorption cost of the good output, the treatment of any abnormally lost or
gained units, and also show the process account and loss account.
SOLUTION
Input costs less sale of normal loss = (5,000 × Sh.9) + Sh.25, 000 – 500 × 1 = 69,500
Expected output = 5,000 × 0.9 = 4,500 (actual output = 4,700; abnormal gain = 200).
. ,
Cost per unit = = Sh.15.4444
,
Process account
Units Sh. Units Sh.
Material 5,000 45,000 To finished goods 4,700 @ 15.4444 72,589
Labour and 25,000 Normal loss: sale of
overheads scrap 500 @1 500
Abnormal gain 200 @15.4444 3,089 - -
5,200 73,089 5,200 73,089
Normal loss account

Units Sh. Units Sh.
Process Cash 300 300
account 500 500 To abnormal gain
- account 200 200
500 500

Abnormal gain account
Units Sh. Units Sh.
Normal loss account 200 200 Process account 200 3,089
Income statement 2,889 -
3,089 3,089
Illustration
ABC Chemicals Ltd manufactures a chemical compound branded 'X' used in making plastics.
The chemical compound involves two processes; A and B. The output of process A is passed to
process B where further material is added to mix. The details of the process costs for the
production period ended 30 April were as follows:
Process A:
Direct materials 5,000 kgs at Sh. 10 per kg.
Direct labour Sh. 40,000
Process plant time 200 hours at Sh. 220 per hour
Overheads Sh. 20,000
Process B:
Direct materials 3,000 kgs at Sh. 10 per kg.
Direct labour Sh. 25,000
Process plant time 120 hours at Sh. 220 per hour
Overheads Sh. 12,000
1. The expected and actual output for the processes was as follows.
A B
Expected output 90% of input 95% of input
Actual output 4,200 Kgs 7,340 Kgs
2. Assume no finished stock at the beginning of the period and no work in progress at either the
beginning or the end of the period.
3. Normal loss is sold as scrap for Sh.1.00 per kilogramme from process A and Sh.2.00per
kilogramme from process 3, for both of which immediate payment is received
Required:
(i) Process A account.
(ii) Process B account.
(iii) Abnormal loss/gain account,
(iv) Normal loss account

Solution
a) ABC Chemicals Ltd
Process A
Expected output = 90% × 5,000 = 4,500
Process Plant time = 200 × 220 = 44,000
Scrap value = 1
Process B
Expected output = 95%×3,000 = 2,850
Process plant time = 120×250 = shs30,000
Scrap value = 2
Process A Account
Units Amount Units Amount
Shs Shs
Direct materials 5,000 - 50,000 Output 4,200 34.111 143,267
Direct labour 40,000 Normal loss 500 1 500
Process plant time 44,000 Abnormal 300 34.111 10,233
Overheads ____ 20,000 loss ____ -
5,000 154,000 5,000 154,000
− /
=
−
, ,
= ,
= ,
= 34.111
Process B Account
Shs Shs
Process A/c 4,200 34.111 143,267 Output 7,340 37.288 273,691
Direct materials 3,000 15 45,000 Normal loss 360 2 720
Direct labour 25,000
Process plant time 30,000
Overheads 12,500
Abnormal gain 500 37.288 18,644 _____ _____
7,700 274,411 7,700 274,411

Abnormal loss/gain account
Shs Shs
Process A A/c 300 34.111 10,233.3 Scrap value 300 1 300

Scrap value 500 2 1,000 Process B 500 37.288 18,644
Profit and loss 7,710.7
18,944 18,944
Normal loss account

Shs Shs
Process A A/c 500 1 500 Bank 1,220
Process B A/c 360 2 720 -
1,220 1,220
ACCOUNTING FOR WORK-IN-PROGRESS (WIP)
In industries where process of manufacturing is continuous, some units may be incomplete at the
end of the period. A problem arises in unit cost as the complete units.
The solution to this problem is to express output in terms of equivalent units. Equivalent units
are assumed complete units output from a production process if a single unit is started and
completed before another is started.
It is based on percentage of completion of output e.g. if 10,000 units were started but only 8000
units were completed and the remainder was left in WIP with 60% degrees of completion, the
equivalent units which will be used for cost calculation will be given by:
Equivalents Units
Complete units – 100% = 800
W-I-P 2000 @ 60% = 1200
Equivalent unit of output 9200
The cost incurred in a process are not incurred uniformly and therefore equivalent units will not
be based on the same percentage of completion i.e. output in a process will carry different
degrees of completion for equivalents unit calculation.

Cost items in a process include:-
i) Transfer in cost
This represents cost introduced in a process. These costs are accounted 100% since input is
transferred into the process as complete unit.
ii) Material added is this process
The percentage of completion depends on how the materials are added in the process.
iii) Conversion costs
This refers to the direct labour and overheads. The percentage of completion will depend on how
the cost is incurred.
Accounting for opening W.I.P

Where there is opening W.I.P the cost data relate to two production period i.e. the previous
period costs for opening and the current period costs for work started this period.
There are two methods which can be used in accounting for W.I.P.
i) Weighted Average Method
ii) FIFO Method
i) Weighted Average Method

In the method, there will be no distinction between input of opening W.I.P and what was
transferred in this period. They will be treated as if they were started at the same time.
The units of output from the process will be assumed to have come from the same batch of input
of opening W.I.P and transfer in.
The costs to account for will relate to the cost incurred in the two periods i.e. the cost will also be
assumed to have been incurred in the same period.
ii) FIFO
In this method, the Opening work in progress and units transferred in this period maintain their
identity and are account separately.
Opening work in progress enters the process first and will be assumed to be completed from O.P
W.I.P and the units started and transferred this period.
The cost incurred will only be relayed to work computed this period i.e. only current cost will be
considered for unit cost calculation.

STEPS IN PREPARING PROCESS COSTING STATEMENT
(1) FIFO Method

a. Physical flow of units; this identifies the units to be accounted for (units in beginning
WIP inventory plus the units started during the period) and the units accounted for (the
units completed during the current period plus the units in the ending WIP)
b. Equivalent units of production: the common denominator for completed units and
partially completed units are computed by multiplying the units accounted for by their
percentage of completion by each category of costs i.e. material cost (100%), labour
cost, e.t.c. (75%).
c. Costs to be accounted for: total costs to be accounted for (the cost of units in the
beginning WIP plus the costs added to production during the current period) are
identified for each category of costs.
d. Cost per equivalent unit of production: these are computed by dividing the costs to
be accounted for by the total equivalent units of production.
e. Costs accounted for (Cost allocation): total costs to be accounted for are allocated
for each category of costs to the units accounted for by multiplying the equivalent
units of production by the cost per equivalent unit of production.
WEIGHTED AVERAGE METHOD (WAM)
a) Physical flow of units; the WAM does not keep the beginning inventory units separate from
the units that were started and completed during the period
b) Equivalent units of production: in computing equivalent units of production, the WAM
does not keep the percentage of completion performed in the prior period separate from the
percentage of completion performed in the current period.
c) Costs to be accounted for: in identifying costs to be accounted for, the WAM does not keep
the costs of the units in the beginning inventory at the start of the current period separate
from the costs added to the production during the current period
d) Cost per equivalent unit of production: these are computed by dividing the costs to be
accounted for by the total equivalent units of production
e) Costs accounted for (Cost allocation): total costs to be accounted are allocated for each
category of costs to the units accounted for by multiplying the equivalent units of production
by the cost per equivalent unit of production. The WAM does not keep the cost of the units in
beginning WIP separate from the costs added to production during the current period.
Illustration
Process 2 received units from process 1 and after carrying out work on the units transferred them
to process 3. For one accounting period the relevant data were as follows:

Opening WIP 200 units (25% complete) valued at Ksh. 2,500
800 units received from Process 1 valued at ksh. 4,300
840 units were transferred to process 3
Closing WIP 160 units (50% complete)
The costs for the period were Ksh. 16,580 and no units were scrapped. It is required to prepare
the process accounts for process 2 units:
i) The FIFO method of valuation.

ii) The average cost method of valuation.
Solution
Using FIFO method

Calculation of effective units of production
Units
Completed units transferred out 840
+ Work contained in closing WIP (160×50%) 80
920
- Work contained in opening WIP (200 x 25%) (50)
Effective units for period 870
Period cost per unit = Total cost for period i.e. process costs + transfers in
Effective units for period
= 16,580 + 4,300
870
= Ksh. 24.
This figure is used to give the closing WIP valuation, i.e.
160 × 50%×Ksh 24 = Ksh. 1,920.
The valuation of the number of complete units transferred to process 3 is found from the balance
on the process account as follows:
Process 2 Account
Unit Ksh Units Kshs.
Opening WIP b/f. receipts 200 2,500 Transfers to 840 21,460
from process 1 800 4,300 process 3
Process costs 16,580 Closing WIP c/f 160 1,920
1,000 23,380 1,000 23,380
Note on illustration (FIFO method):

The transfer value of Ksh. 21,460 is the balance on the account and is Kshs. 1,300 greater than
the period cost per unit already calculated i.e. Kshs. 21,460 - (840 x Kshs. 24) = Kshs. 1,300.
This is the amount by which the opening WIP valuation (based on the previous period's costs) is
greater than the current period costs i.e.
Kshs. 2,500 - (200 x 25% × Kshs. 24) = Kshs. 1,300.
Thus, it would be seen that only the current period cost levels, i.e. The Kshs. 24 per unit are
carried forward to the next period in the closing WIP valuation.
Using average cost method

Using this system the effective units are the transfers to the next process (840 units) plus the
work contained in the closing WIP (80 units i.e. 50% of 160 units) that is a total of 920 units.
The costs involved are the total of the opening WIP valuation + the valuation of units transferred
in + the process 2 costs i.e.
Kshs. 2,500 + 4,300 + 16,580 = Kshs. 23,380.
Average cost per unit = 23,380 = Kshs. 25.413.
920
This is used to value both the closing stock and transfers out thus:
Closing stock valuation = 160 x 50% x Kshs. 25.413 = Kshs. 2,033.
Transfers to process 3 = 840 x Kshs. 25.413 - Kshs. 21,347
The process account is as follows:

Units Kshs. Units Kshs.
Opening WIP b/d 800 4,300
Receipts from Transfers to 840 21,347
Process 1 16,580 Process 3
Process costs Closing WIP c/d 160 2,033
1,000 23,380 1,000 23,380
Note-illustration (average cost method):

1. It will be seen that the effect of the average cost method is, in this example, to increase the
value of closing stock and reduce the value of transfers to process 3. This is because the
previous period cost levels (as contained in the opening WIP valuation) were higher than the
current cost levels. If the previous period cost levels were lower than current levels the
average cost method would cause the closing WIP valuations to be lower than when using
the FIFO system.
2. The above example has deliberately been kept simple to show clearly the principles involved.
Examples follow which show the added complications of abnormal and normal scrap and
where the elements material, labour and overheads) or the opening and closing WIP are
involved. It must be stressed however. That these added complications merely increase the

amount of arithmetic involved, they do not alter the basic principles explained above so it is
important that these are thoroughly understood before proceeding further.
Illustration
This example illustrates the treatment of opening and closing WIP where the WIP is broken
down into its various elements.
The following data relate to process y for accounting period 2.
At the beginning of period 2, there were 800 units partly completed which had the following
values:
Value Kshs Percentage complete
Input material (from process x) 8,200 100
Material introduced 5,600 55
Labour 3,200 60
Overheads 2,400 45
During the period 4,300 units were transferred from process x at a value of Kshs. 46,500 and
other costs were:
Kshs.
Material introduced 24,000
Labour 19,500
Overhead 18,200
At the end of the period, the closing WIP was 600 units which were at the following stage of
completion:
Input material 100% complete

Material introduced 50% complete
Labour 45% complete
Overheads 40% complete
The balance of 4,500 units was transferred to finished goods.

Calculate the value of units transferred to finished goods and the value of WIP and prepare the
process account using
i) The FIFO method and

ii) The average cost method
Solution to the above illustration using FIFO method

As previously, the first step is to calculate the effective units of production for the period. This
follows identical principles to example 4 except that in this example it is necessary to consider
the four elements of the units (input material, material introduced, labour and overheads) instead
of simply the units as whole. When the effective production is ascertained the cost per unit, for
each element, can be calculated.
Calculation of effective units and cost per unit
Cost element Completed + Equiv. - Equiv. = Total Cost Cost

units Units in units in effective Kshs per unit
closing opening production Kshs
WIP WIP
Input
Material 4500 + 600 - 800 = 4300 46500 10.814
Material Intro. 4500 + 300 - 440 = 4360 24000 5.505
Labour 4500 + 270 - 480 = 4290 19500 4.545
Overheads 4500 + 240 - 360 = 4380 18200 4.155
Closing stock valuation = 600 units

Kshs. Kshs.
Input material = 100% complete = 600 x 10.814 6,488
Material introduced = 50% complete = 300 x 5.505 1,651
Labour = 45% complete = 270% x 4.545 1,277
Overheads = 40% complete = 240 x 4.155 997

Kshs. 10,363
This value is used in the process account in the normal way with the value of the transfers to
finished goods being the balance on the account.
Process account – process y (FIFO)
Transfer in from Transfers to
Process x 4,300 46,500 Finished goods 4,500 117,237
Materials Introduced 24,080 Closing WIP c/d 600 10,363
Labour 19,500
Overheads 18,200
5,100 127,600 5,100 127,600

Solution to the above illustration using average cost method
Cost Equivalent units in Fully Total Opening Period Total Cost per
elements closing WIP + Complete = WIP +costs = cost unit
units effective values (b) (b) ÷ (a)
production
(a)
Input 600 x 100% = 600 4500 = 5100 Kshs.820 + 46500 =sh.54700 Sh.10725
material + 4500 = 4800 0 + 24000 = 29600 6.167
Material 600 x 50% = 300 4500 = 4770 5600 + 19500 = 22700 4.759
Intro + 4500 = 4740 3200 + 18200 = 20600 4.356
Labour 600 x 45% = 270 2400
Overheads +
600 x 40% = 240
+
Sh.19400 + =sh.127600 Sh.25.997
sh.108200
Value of completed production = 4,500 x Shs. 25.997 = Shs. 116,987.
The value of the closing WIP can be found either by deducting the value of completed
production from total costs or, more tediously, by calculating the various element values, as
follows:
Value of closing WIP
= total cost – value of completed production
= Shs. 127,600 – 116,987 = Shs. 10,613
Or this can be calculated by using the various element values i.e.

600 x shs.10.725 = Shs.6,435.00
300 x shs.6.167 = Shs.1,850.10
270 x shs.4.759 = Shs.1,284.93
240 x shs.4.346 = Shs.10,613.07 (slight rounding error)
The process account can now be completed
Process account – process y (average cost)
Units Kshs. Units Kshs
Transfers in from Transfers to
Process x 4,300 46,500 Finished goods 4,500 117,237
Materials Introduced 24,080 Closing WIP c/d 600 10,363
Labour
Overheads 19,500
18,200
5,100 127,600 5,100 127,600

Illustration
This is more complicated example which brings together the various facets of process costing
covered in the chapter. It includes opening and closing WIP and normal and abnormal losses
where the scrapped units are not fully complete.
The following data relate to process 2 for one accounting period. Process 2 receives units from
process 1 and, after processing, transfers them to process 3.
Opening WIP 600 units

Value Shs Percentage complete %
Input material 720 100
Material introduced 500 60
Labour 340 50
Overheads 270 40
Transfers from process 1: 4, 100 units valued at shs.5,200.

Transfers to process 3: 3, 500 units
Shs
Materials introduced 2,956
Labour 2,200
Overheads 1,900
Closing stock 800 units at the following stage of completion

Input materials 100% complete
Labour 50% complete
400 units were scrapped at the following stage of completion

Input material 100% complete
Labour 40% complete
The normal loss is 10% of production and the scrapped units realized 40p each. It is required to
prepare the process account for process 2 using
i) The FIFO method,
ii) The average cost method.

Solution to example 6 using FIFO method
The first stage is to calculate the amount of normal loss to see whether there is any abnormal loss
or gain involved.
The production for the period is calculated as follows:
Opening WIP 600 units
+ Transfers in 4,100
4,700
- closing WIP 800
Production 3,900 units
Normal loss is 10% of 3,900 = 390, and as the actual number scrapped were 400, there were 10
units of abnormal loss.
The calculation of effective units for cost calculation purposes follows the same principles as in
examples 4 and 5 except that the number of units of abnormal loss must be included in the total
effective production because, as explained, abnormal losses are costed on the same basis as good
production.
Cost element Complete Equiv. Equiv. Equiv. Total Costs Cost

d units + unit +units in - units in = Shs per
in abnorma opening effective unit
closing l loss WIP productio Shs.
WIP n
Input material 3500 + 800 + 10 - 600 = 3710 2500 1.402
Material intro. 3500 + 480 + 10 - 360 = 3630 2800 0.771
Labour 3500 + 400 + 4 - 300 = 3604 2200 0.610
Overheads 3500 + 320 + 3 - 240 = 3583 1900 0.530
(This is the cost of the material introduced, Shs. 2,956, less the resale value of the normal loss,
Shs.156 i.e. 390 @ 40p each. The resale value of the 10 units of abnormal loss is credited to the
abnormal loss account not the process account.)
The costs per unit calculated are then used to evaluate the value of the closing WIP and the
abnormal loss.

Closing WIP valuation Shs.
Input material 800 equivalent units @ Shs. 1.402 1,121.60
Material introduced 480 equivalent units @ 0.771 370.08
Labour 400 equivalent units @ 0.610 244.00
Overheads 320 equivalent units @ 0.530 169.60
Shs.1,905.28
Say Shs. 1,905
Abnormal loss valuation Shs.

Input material 10 equivalent units @ Shs. 1.402 14.02
Material introduced 10 equivalent units @ 0.771 7.71
Labour 4 equivalent units @ 0.610 2.44
Overheads 32 equivalent units @ 0.530 1.59
25.76
Say shs.26.
The process account can now be prepared.

Process 2 account (FIFO)
Opening WIP 600 1,830
Transfers from Normal loss 390 156
Process 1 4,100 5,200
Material - 2,956 Abnormal loss 10 26
Labour - 2,200 Transfers to process 3 3500 11,999
Overheads - 1,900 Closing WIP 800 1,905
4,700 14,086 4,700 14,086
Solution to illustration above using average cost

Cost element Equiv. Equiv. Complet Effective Openin Period Total Cost
Units + unit in e. +units = g WIP + cost costs per unit
in abnorma production value Shs. Shs.
closin l loss Shs.
g WIP
Input 800 + 10 + 3500 = 4310 720 + 5200 =5920 1.373
material 480 + 10 + 3500 = 3990 500 + 2800 = 3300 0.827
Material 400 + 4 + 3500 = 3904 340 + 2200 = 2540 0.651
intro. 320 + 3 + 3500 = 3823 270 + 1900 = 2170 0.568
Labour
Overheads

The various costs per unit are used to evaluate the closing WIP, abnormal loss and the completed
production:
The various costs per unit are used to evaluate the closing WIP, abnormal loss and the completed
production:
Closing WIP Cost per unit Value
Equivalent units
800 X 1.373 = 1,098.40
480 X 0.827 = 396.96
400 X 0.651 = 260.40
320 X 0.568 = 181.76
1,937.52
Say Shs 1,938.
Abnormal
10 × loss Shs.13.73
10 × 1.373 = 8.27
4 × 0.827 = 2.60
3 × 0.651 = 1.70
0.568 = 26.30
Say Shs.26.
Completed production
3,500 × 1.373 = 4,805.50

3,500 × 0.827 = 2,894.50
3,500 × 0.651 = 2,278.50
3,500 × 0.568 = 1,988.00
Shs.11,966.50
These values are used in the process account.
Process 2 account (average cost)

Opening WIP 600 1,830 Normal loss
Transfers from 390 156
Process 1 4,100 5,200 Abnormal loss 10 26
Material 2,956 Transfers to process
Labour 2,200 3 3500 11,969
Overheads 1,900 Closing WIP 800 1,938
4,700 Sh.14,086 4,700 14,086

Note: if instead of the abnormal loss, there had been an abnormal gain the treatment would be as
follows for both average cost and the FIFO methods. The total effective production would be
found as in example 5 less the number of abnormal gain units. These units would be evaluated at
the cost per unit calculated and the process account debited with the abnormal gain units and
their value. It follows that abnormal gain units will always be fully complete whereas abnormal
loss units may be partially or fully complete.
JOINT AND BY PRODUCTS
JOINT PRODUCTS
These are two or more products produced in the same process and separated at a certain
separation or split off point.
They are a group of individual products which are produced simultaneously together with each
product having a significant sales unless to merit recognition as a main product.
They are identified as individual products at a certain stage of completion where products
separate to become individual products.
Features of joint products

1. They are produced in the same process.
2. They cannot be distinguished from each other until split off point.
3. They have substantial sales value.
4. They may require further processing after separation.
Accounting for joint products

Joint products are not separately identified until the split off point. Each product should be casted
separately and the main problem is how to account for common costs in the joint costs.
There are several methods that can be used to allocate joint costs which include:
 Units of output
 Sales value at separation point
 Net realizable value
i) Units of output ( Physical measures method)

In this method joint cost are allocated on the basis of relative weight of output of each product
relative to the total output.
This method is suitable where units of measurement of the products are the same.
Limitations
Products may separate at different states in liquids, gases, solids etc.
In this case the method will be unsuitable since the products have different units of measurement.

It fails to recognize the revenue earning power of individual products and allocates the same
costs to all products irrespective of the revenue generated.
Illustration
AMC plc incurred joint costs of Shs.2,400 in manufacturing Product A and Product B to the
split-off
point; Product A weighed 700 kg and had a sales value at the split-off point of Shs1,800; Product
B weighed 300kg and had a sales value at the split-off point of Shs.1,200 Cost Allocation:
Required: Using the physical measure /unit approach, calculate the cost allocated to products A
and B. Prepare the income statement for the period
Solution
Product A = 700 / (700 + 300) ×2,400 1,680

Product B 300 / 1,000 x 2,400 720
2,400
Income statement
Product A Product B Total
Sales 1,800 1,200 3,000
Cost of Goods Sold (1,680) (720) (2,400)
Gross Margin 120 480 600
Gross Margin %:
Product A = 120 / 1,800 = 7%
Product B = 480 / 1,200 = 40%
Total = 600 / 3,000 = 20%
ii) Sales value at separation point (sales value Method)

In this method, costs are allocated to the products on the basis of revenues generated at
separation point.
The method is appropriate where the products become sellable at the split-off point.
Joint costs are apportioned to each product on the basis of proportion that the sales value of the
product have relative to the total.
iii) Net Realizable value

Joint product may have no market value at the point of separation because they need further
processing for them to be ready for sale or they may be processed further to enhance their value.
Net realizable value is defined as the sales value minus additional processing and disposed costs.

In the method, joint costs to be allocated to individual products will on the basis of individual net
realizable value relative to the total net realizable value.
Illustration
A production process has joint costs of Sh.12, 000 for the input of 1,000 kgs of material. Two
products are produced from this:
Product A: 600 kgs. Selling price = Sh.25/unit. Separate costs = Sh.4, 000
Product B: 400 kgs. Selling price = Sh.40/unit. Separate costs = Sh.7,000
Required;-
Calculate the inventory value of the production using
(a) Weight to apportion the joint costs
(b) Net realisable value to apportion the joint costs
Solution
(a) Joint costs apportioned using weight
Product A Product B
(600 kg) (400 kg)
Separate costs 4,000 7,000
Pre-separation costs60:40 sh.12,000 7,200 4,800
Total costs 11,200 11,800
(b) Joint costs apportioned using net realizable value

Product A Product B
Sh. Sh.
Sales value 15,000 16,000
Post separation/own costs (4,000) (7,000)
Net realizable value 11,000 9,000
Pre-separation costs11000/20,000 and 9/20 of sh.12,000 6,600 5,400
Illustration
A production process has joint costs of Sh.12, 000 for the input of 1,000 kgs of material. Two
products are produced from this:
Product A: 500 kgs. Selling price = Sh.25/unit. Separate costs = Sh.4,000
Product B: 400 kgs. Selling price = Sh.40/unit. Separate costs = Sh.7,000
By product: 100 kgs. Selling price = Sh.2/kg

Required;
Calculate the inventory value of the production of the joint products using
(a) Weight to apportion the joint costs
(b) Net realizable value to apportion the joint costs
Solution
(a) Joint costs apportioned using weight
Sales of the by-product will produce revenue of Sh.200, so the joint cost is reduced to Sh.11, 800
Product A Product B
(400 kg) (500 kg)
Pre-separation costs 50:40 of Sh.11,800 6,555 5,245
(b) Joint costs apportioned using net realizable value
Product A Product B
Sh. Sh.
Sales value 500 ×25; Sh.400 ×Sh.40 12,500 16,000
Post separation/own costs (4,000) (7,000)
Net realizable value 8,500 9,000
Pre-separation costs 8.5/17.5 and 9/17.5 of 5,731 6,069
Sh.11,800 9,731 13,069
Total costs
Illustration
Jitegemee limited company uses a process costing system in its operation. In one of the
production processes, two joint products A and B and a by-product C are produced
The following additional information is provided:
1. Each processing run requires 12,500 kilograms of output. The costs incurred are as follow:-
Sh.
Materials 456,250
Labour 295,000
Overheads 268,750

2. It is expected that 20% of the input will be damaged in the production process. This is sold as
scrap at sh. 10 per kilogram. The damaged items are detected at the end of the production
process.
3. The output from the production process is as follows:-
Product Output Selling price per
kilogram
A 50% 200
B 40% 250
C 10% 20
4. Product A has to be processed further at a cost of sh. 100 per kilogram before sale
5. The joint costs are allocated to the products on the basis of net releasable value
Required:
i. Determine the total cost of the output from the production process
ii. Calculate the allocated joint costs for product A and product B
iii. Prepare a process account for the production process above
Solution
i)
Output units
Input units 12500
N. loss (20% ×12500) 2500
= 10,000kgs
Output units per product

A: 50% × 10,000 = 5000
B: 4% x 10000 = 4000
C: 10% x 10000 = 1000
= 10,000
Total process cost

D. materials 456,250
D. labour 295,000
O/Hs 268,75 0
1,020,0000
Less:
Scrap for N. loss (2500 x 10) (25,000)
By-pdt C (1000×20) (20,000)
Total cost Joint costs (A&B) 975,000

ii)
NRV = Sales – Further process
A: (5000 x 200 – (5000 x 100) = 500,000
B: (4000 x 250) – 0 = 1,000,000
= 1,500,000
Joint cost allocation
,
A: × 975,000= sh. 325,000
, ,
, ,
B: × 975,000 = sh. 650,000
, ,
Process account
Units Cost Value Units Cost Value
R. materials 12,500 456,250 Joint product: A 5000 325,000
Labour 295,000 B 4000 650,000
O/HS 268,750 By-product 1000 20 20,000
- N. loss 2500 10 25,000
12,500 1,020,000 12,500 1,020,000
BY-PRODUCTS
These are products recovered incidentally from materials used to manufacture main products.
They are one or more products produced incidentally during this manufacture of the main
product.
Examples of by-products; wax, hides, molasses, saw dust and coffee husks
Features of a by-product
1. They have relatively low sales value when compared to the main products.
2. They are not intended to be produced.
Joint cost will only be allocated to the recognized main product.
No costs are allocated to the by-product. However any amount realized from sale of by-
products may be accounted for as follows:
i) The sales value on the net realizable value (NRV) of the by-products is added to the sales
of the sales of the main product i.e. it is treated as additional revenue of the main product.
ii) The sales on the net realizable value of the by-products is deducted from the cost of
production of the main product is valued at net cost of production. This is the main
method of accounting and by-products.
iii) The amount realized is treated as a miscellaneous income and transferred to P&L
statement.

NB If the method is not given use the amount realized to reduce the product cost of the main
product (Method ii)
SERVICE COSTING
Service costing is a cost accounting method concerned with establishing the costs of services
rendered.
Despite this definition, we should note immediately that even though we may be dealing with
services that are intangible, the cost accounting methods we use are essentially the same as if we
were making cars, biscuits or televisions.
When we set up a service cost accounting system, therefore, we would need to keep in mind the
fact that the progression, for example, of a cheque through the banking system, can be treated as
items of raw material passing through a production process. Similarly, we should readily
appreciate that the provision of a transport service has much in common, from the cost
accounting point of view, with the manufacture of the lorry or van that is being used to provide
the service.
Specific Examples: where is service costing applied?

Transport
Hotels
Tourism
Solicitors
Education
Retail distribution
Financial services
Service costing is also applied within a manufacturing setting.

For example, a manufacturer might wish to calculate the costs of the following services:
Transport
Catering
Computing and IT
Accounting
Human resources
The Differences between Product Costing and Service Costing

 There may be very few, if any, materials to worry about
 Overheads will comprise the most significant portion of any costs of which, labour costs may
well comprise as much as 70%

Service Costing: profit or cost centre?
Many organisations simply want to determine the costs of operating its services from a
management control and management information point of view. However, there are many
organisations now that operate services for their own organisations as well as sub contracting
them out to other organisations. For example, there are companies that operate their own payroll
section for themselves; and offer this service to other organisations as well. Other organisations
sell CPU time on their computers at times when they do not use it themselves: for example, in
overnight batch work.
One key factor here is that we might be in the situation of assessing the least cost basis for
providing a service, rather than the highest profit possible.
Service Cost Units

What are the cost units for a service? For a manufacturer, cost units would be
Motor cars
Packets of biscuits or boxes containing, say, 100 packets of biscuits
Television sets
Service costing is no longer an elective pursuit, it is a compulsory exercise. It ensures that tariffs
represent prices for customers and competitors. Economic, accounting and engineering costs all
play a role in determining service costs. Engineering costs measure technological relationship
between inputs, outputs, Accounting costs record, analyze historic costs according to industry
rules, Economic costs apply the theories of resource allocation to forward looking costs
Examples of operating costs include repair and maintenance, labour, site rental, utilities, license,
regulatory fees and taxes and depreciation.
Service costing can use either of the methods highlighted below:

• Activity based costing; ABC assigns costs based on the activities required to deliver a service
and the resources these activities absorb. ABC might bring more transparency in the calculation
of transferred cost, making the current costing practice look redundant.
Nevertheless, ABC hides potential inefficiencies of the service provider. Even if an element or
asset is underutilized, its cost is completely shared by the services that use it and there is no
incentive for the provider to improve its efficiency
• Fully distributed cost; in here, the total cost of a service, both direct and indirect costs, are
distributed among the services sold. FDC comes from historic/embedded cost. It relates prices to
information available in accounting, billing systems. However, it requires judgment in allocating
indirect costs devising methodology.

• Long run average incremental cost (LRAIC): this constitutes cost of production of an
additional unit plus an allocated share of common costs. Forward-looking costs are used to
approximate costs in a competitive market, not historical costs which typically reflect
inefficiencies and investment in outdated technologies. LRAIC mimics the competitive
marketplace and encourages economic efficiencies. However, it is difficult to calculate or model
the incremental costs, lacks transparency and negotiation skills and specialized expertise on
inputs required. Additionally, an amalgamation of embedded and forward looking costs, blended
together and computed on an average cost basis should not be called incremental cost.
• Marginal cost: this measures the change in total output resulting from a small change in the
level of activity. The marginal cost in this case is the cost of adding a service to an existing
portfolio of products or services.
Fully Distributed Cost (FDC) and Long Run Average Incremental Cost (LRAIC) are the
common ones in literature and in practice. FDC may be “easier” to calculate, but LRAIC
promotes operator
Illustration
Steer & Wheel Ltd distribute its goods to a regional retailer using a single lorry. The dealer's
premises are 40 km away by road. The lorry has a capacity of 10½ tones and makes journeys
twice a day fully loaded on the outward journeys and empty on the return journeys. The
following information is available for a four week budget control period: period 8 of 2004.
Petrol consumption 8 km per 5 litres of petrol

Petrol cost Shs 0.36 per litre
Oil Shs 8 per week
Driver's wages and NI Shs 140 per week
Repairs Shs 72 per week
Garaging Shs 4 per day based on a seven day week
Cost of lorry when new (excludes tyres) Shs 18,750
Life of lorry 80,00 km
Insurance Shs 650 per year
Cost of a set of tyres Shs 1,250
Life of a set of tyres 25,000 km
Estimated sales value of lorry at the end of its life Shs 2,750
Vehicle licence cost Shs 234 per year
Other overhead costs Shs 3,900 per year
The lorry is operated on a five day week basis.

Required:
Prepare a statement to show the total costs of operating the lorry in period 8 2004 analyzed into
running costs and standing costs.
Solution
Let’s set out an attractive table showing our costs classified according to whether they are
running or standing costs:
Running Standing
Cost
Cost Cost
Petrol consumption X
Petrol cost per litre X
Oil X
Driver's wages and NI X
Repairs X
Garaging X
Cost of lorry when new (excludes tyres) X
Life of lorry X
Insurance X
Cost of a set of tyres X
Life of a set of tyres X
Estimated sales value of lorry at the end of its life X
Vehicle licence cost X
Other overhead costs X
NOTE: just in case there is any doubt, the driver's wages and NI are standing costs because they
do NOT vary with the number of km driven. Check that you agree with our other classifications.
Statement of Total Costs of Operating the Lorry: Period 8 2004

Vehicle Operating Costs: Period 8 2004
Running Costs
Petrol 720
Depreciation 640
Tyres 160
1,520
Standing costs
Garaging 112
Oil 32
Driver's wages and NI 560
Repairs 288
Insurance 50
Vehicle licence 18
Other overheads 300
1,360
Total Operating Costs 2,880

Workings
Petrol Cost: Km driven: 40 km×2×2 ×5 ×4 = 3,200 km Petrol consumption: 3200 km ÷ 8 km ×
5 litres = 2,000 litres Petrol cost = 2,000 litres / Shs 0.36 per litre = Shs 720
Depreciation: (Cost of lorry - residual value ÷ life of lorry) × km driven = (Shs 18,750 - 2,750 ÷
80,000 km) ×3,200 km = £0.2/km ×3,200 km = Shs 640
Cost of Tyres: (cost of tyres ÷ life of tyres) ×km driven = (£1,250 ÷ 25,000 km) ×3,200 km =
Shs 0.05/km × 3,200 km = Shs 160
Garaging:Shs 4 ×7 ×4 = Shs 112
Repairs:Shs 72 ×4 = Shs 288
Insurance:Shs 650 ÷ 52×4 = Shs 50
Vehicle licence:Shs 234 ÷ 52 ×4 = Shs 18
Other overhead costs:Shs 3,900 ÷ 52 ×4 = Shs 300
UNIT COSTING
The unit cost of a product or service is obtained by assigning total costs to many identical or
similar units.
Companies need to allocate total product costs to units for the following reasons:
i) The company may manufacture thousands or millions of units of products in a given period
of time
ii) Products are manufactured in large quantities, but may be sold in small quantities sometimes
at one time or in dozens or bulk.
iii) It is important to determine with accuracy the cost of goods sold as it is needed, especially at
the point of transfer from finished goods to cost of sales. This calls for a correct and accurate
accounting for product cost per unit in order to properly match costs against related sales
revenue. This also helps managers to maintain cost control over the manufacturing process.
iv) A small change in unit cost can represent a significant change in overall profitability, when
selling millions of units of a product. Managers thus need to keep track of per unit cost on
daily basis through the production process while at the same time dealing with materials and
output in large quantities

v) Materials in the production process might need to be given a value, process costing allows
for this through the determination of equivalent units and cost per equivalent unit of
production.
REVISION EXERCISES
QUESTION ONE
Timau Ltd produces a detergent which passes through two processes namely mixing and refining
to completion. The following data relate to the refining process for the month of June 2000.
Cost of opening stock: Sh.
Materials 100,000
Labour 25,000
Overheads 60,000
During the month 20,000 units were passed from the mixing to the refining process. Costs
incurred during the month were:
Shs
Labour 125,000
Overheads 108,100
Other materials 45,300
At the end of the month 21,000 units had been completed and passed to finished goods while
4,000 were still in process having reached the following stages:
Materials - 100%
Labour - 40%
Overheads - 60%
Required:
Refining Process Account

Solution:
Timau Ltd
Production Statement: June 2000
Inputs Total output Material Labour Overhead
Units Units Units Units
Baa b/f 5,000 21,000 21,000 21,000 21,000
Mixing Process 20,000 4,000 4,000 1,600 2,400
25,000 25,000 25,000 22,600 23,400
Total Cost Equivalent Units of

Production
(Shs) (Shs) (Shs) (Shs)
Balance b/f (W.I.P) 185,000 100,000 25,000 60,000
Costs Added 278,400 45,300 125,000 108,100
Total Costs to account 463,400 145,300 150,000 168,100
for:
Cost per Equivalent 19.633 5.812 6.637 7.184
Unit:
Costs Accounted for as

follows:
Transfer to finished 412,291 122,050 139,380 150,859
goods:
21,000 x 19.633
Closing work in Process: 51,109 23,248 10,619 17,242
Total Costs Accounted 463,400 145,300 149,999 168,101
for:
Refining Process A/C
Units Unit Value Units Unit Value
Cost cost
Balb/f 5,000 185,000 Finished 21,000 19.633 412,291
(W.I.P) goods
Units added 20,000 Closing
W.I.P
Costs added Bal c/f 4,000 12.777 51,109
Raw material - 45,300
Labour 125,000
overheads 108,100
25,000 463,400 25,000 463,400

QUESTION TWO
Tinn Ltd produces a detergent which passes through two processes namely mixing and refining t
completion. The following data relate to the refining process for the month of October 2000:
Opening stock 5,000 units
Cost of opening stock:
Sh
Materials 100,000
Labour 25,000
Overheads 60,000
Total cost 185,000
During the month, 20,000 units were passed from the mixing to the refining process. Costs
incurred during the month were:
Sh
Labour 125,000
Overheads 108,100
Other materials 45,300
Total cost 278,400
At the end of the month, 21,000 units had been completed and passed to finished goods while
4,000 units were still in the process having reached the following stages:
Materials 100%
Labour 80%
Overheads 60%
Required:
Refining process account
Solution:
Refining Process Account

Process Inputs: Units Cost Transferred to: Units Cost
(Shs)
Opening W.I.P 5,000 185,000 Finished 21,000 403,074
Products
Input: 20,000 - Closing W.I.P 4,000 60,326.20
Conversion - 125,000
Costs
Labour -
Overheads - 108,100
Other Materials - 45,300
25,000 463,400 25,000 463,400

Valuation of Finished Units:
Equivalent Units of:
Materials: Finished Goods + W.I.P= 25,000 UNITS

21,000 + (4,000 × 100%)
Cost per Unit of Raw Material = 100,000 + 45,300 = Sh.5.812

25,000.
Labour: 21,000 + (4,000 x 80%) = 24,200
Cost per unit of labour = 25,000 + 125,000 = Sh. 6.1983

24,200
Overheads: 21,000 + (4,000 x 60%) = 23,400 units
Cost per unit of Overhead = 60,000 + 108,100= Sh. 7.184

23,000
Cost per finished Unit = 5.812 + 6.1983 + 7.184 = Sh. 19.194
Tinn ltd
Production statement
Physical Units:
Inputs: Units Unit Cost

Opening Stock 5,000 -
Units Introduced 20,000 -
25,000
Units Accounted for as:
To finished goods 21,000 -
To work in process 4,000 -
25,000

Cost Statement
Shs.
Opening Stock 185,100
Costs Added
Labour 125,000
Overheads 108,000
Materials 45,300
Costs to Account for 463,400
Accounted for as follows:
To finished goods:
21,000 x 19.194 403,074
To work in process:
Material: 4000 x 5.812 23,248
Labour: 3,200 x 6.1983 19,836.4
Overheads: 2,400 x 7.184 17,241.6
Valuation of work in process 60,326
Total Costs accounted for: 463,400

TOPIC 7
MARGINAL AND ABSORPTION COSTING

Marginal and absorption costing are two different approaches to dealing with fixed production
overheads and whether or not they are included in valuing inventory.
Definition of Marginal Costing
Marginal Costing, also known as Variable Costing, is a costing method whereby decisions can be
taken regarding the ascertainment of total cost or the determination of fixed and variable cost in
order to find out the best process and product for production etc.
It identifies the Marginal Cost of production and shows its impact on profit for the change in the
output units. Marginal cost refers to the movement in the total cost, due to the production of an
additional unit of output.
In marginal costing all the variable costs are regarded as product related costs while fixed costs
are assumed as period costs. Therefore, fixed cost of production is posted to the Profit & Loss
Account. Moreover, fixed cost is also not given relevance while determining the selling price of
the product or at the time of valuation of closing stock (whether it is finished goods or Work in
Progress).
Illustration
Suppose company X makes two products A and B. A takes 2 labor hours each to make and B
takes 5 labor hours. What is the overhead cost per unit for A and B respectively if overheads are
absorbed on the basis of labor hours?
Solution
Step 1- Estimate overheads for the period.

X estimates it to be shs. 50,000
Step 2- Estimate activity level for the period

X estimates a total of 100,000 direct labor hours will be worked
Step 3- Divide the estimated overhead by budgeted activity level.

Absorption rate = Shs.50, 000
100, 000 hours
= shs.0.50 per direct labor hours
Step 4- Absorb overhead into the cost unit by applying absorption rate.

A B
Labor hours/unit 2 5
Absorption Rate(SHS) 0.5 0.5
Overhead absorbed/unit 1 2.5
Note: The activity level of 100,000 hours is the basis over which the overheads will be absorbed.
Different bases will used as shown in the table illustration previously.
Advantages of marginal costing

1. Marginal costing is simple to understand.
2. By not charging fixed overhead to cost of production, the effect of varying charges per unit is
avoided.
3. It prevents the illogical carry forward in stock valuation of some proportion of current year’s
fixed overhead.
4. The effects of alternative sales or production policies can be more readily available and
assessed, and decisions taken would yield the maximum return to business.
5. It eliminates large balances left in overhead control accounts which indicate the difficulty of
ascertaining an accurate overhead recovery rate.
6. Practical cost control is greatly facilitated. By avoiding arbitrary allocation of fixed
overhead, efforts can be concentrated on maintaining a uniform and consistent marginal cost.
It is useful to various levels of management.
7. It helps in short-term profit planning by breakeven and profitability analysis, both in terms of
quantity and graphs. Comparative profitability and performance between two or more
products and divisions can easily be assessed and brought to the notice of management for
decision making.
Disadvantages of marginal costing

1. The separation of costs into fixed and variable is difficult and sometimes gives misleading
results.
2. Normal costing systems also apply overhead under normal operating volume and this shows
that no advantage is gained by marginal costing.
3. Under marginal costing, stocks and work in progress are understated. The exclusion of fixed
costs from inventories affect profit, and true and fair view of financial affairs of an
organization may not be clearly transparent.
4. Volume variance in standard costing also discloses the effect of fluctuating output on fixed
overhead. Marginal cost data becomes unrealistic in case of highly fluctuating levels of
production, e.g., in case of seasonal factories.
5. Application of fixed overhead depends on estimates and not on the actuals and as such there
may be under or over absorption of the same.

6. Control affected by means of budgetary control is also accepted by many. In order to know
the net profit, we should not be satisfied with contribution and hence, fixed overhead is also a
valuable item. A system which ignores fixed costs is less effective since a major portion of
fixed cost is not taken care of under marginal costing.
7. In practice, sales price, fixed cost and variable cost per unit may vary. Thus, the assumptions
underlying the theory of marginal costing sometimes becomes unrealistic. For long term
profit planning, absorption costing is the only answer.
Definition of Absorption Costing
Absorption Costing is a method for inventory valuation whereby all the manufacturing expenses
are allocated to the cost centers to recognize the total cost of production. These manufacturing
expenses include all fixed as well as variable costs. It is the traditional method for cost
ascertainment, also known by the name Full Absorption Costing.
In an absorption costing system, both the fixed and variable costs are regarded as product related
cost. In this method the objective behind the assignment of the total cost to cost center is to
recover it from the selling price of the product.
On the basis of function, the expenses are divided into Production, Administration and Selling &
Distribution. The following are the types of Absorption Costing:
 Activity Based Costing

 Job Costing
 Process Costing
Illustration
PQR limited is a manufacturer of sports shoes. The company uses a standard system. The
standard cost per pair of spots shoes is as follows:
Sh.
Direct materials 500
Direct labour: 4 hours × sh. 60 / hour 240
Production overheads
Variable 4 hours × sh. 30 / hour 120
Fixed 100
Standard production cost 960
Standard selling price 1,500
1. During the month of March 2011, production was 10,000 units as planned but he sales
made were 8,000 units
2. The total fixed production overhead variance during the month was sh. 100,000 adverse

3. The standard fixed production overhead absorption rate was based on a budgeted activity
of 10,00 units
4. There was no opening stock at the beginning of the month
5. All units were sold at the standard selling price
6. Other costs incurred during the month were as follows:
Variable Fixed
Sh.
Selling and distribution 20% of sales 600,000
Administration 1,000,000
Required:
Income statement for the month of March 2011 using Absorption costing
Solution
PQR Limited
Income statement (using absorption)
For the month of March 2011
Sh. ‘000’ Sh. ‘000’
Sales (1500×8000) 12,000
Cost of sales
Cost of production (960×10000) 9,600
Closing stock (2000× 960) (1,920) (7,680)
Gross profit 4,320
Expenses
Selling & distribution: Variable 2,400
(20%×12000) 600 (3,000)
Fixed (1,000)
Administration expense (100)
Fixed production overheads under-
absorbed
Net profit 220
Advantages of absorption costing

i) Fixed costs are substantial and increasing proportion of costs in modern industry. It thus
forms a significant part of costs of production so it should be included. Marginal costing
divorces fixed costs from production.

ii) It is used preferably where stock building is a necessary part of operations e.g. wine
making. Otherwise fictitious losses will be shown in earlier periods to be offset eventually
by excessive profits when goods are sold.
iii) Relying on marginal costs could lead to management setting prices at below total costs but
making slight contribution. This is avoided in absorption costing.
iv) International Financial Reporting Standards suggest that costs and revenues must be
matched in the period when revenues arise not when costs are incurred. It also recommends
that stock valuation must include production overheads incurred in the normal course of
business even if such overheads are time related.
DISTINCTION BETWEEN MARGINAL AND ABSORPTION COSTING
Comparison Chart
Basis for
Marginal Costing Absorption Costing
Comparison
A decision making technique for Apportionment of total costs to the cost

ascertaining the total cost of center in order to determine the total cost
Meaning
production is known as Marginal of production is known as Absorption
Costing. Costing.
The variable cost is considered as

Cost Both fixed and variable cost is considered
product cost while fixed cost is
Recognition as product cost.
considered as period costs.
Classification of Production, Administration and Selling &

Fixed and Variable
Overheads Distribution
Profitability is measured by Profit Due to the inclusion of fixed cost,

Profitability
Volume Ratio. profitability gets affected.
Variances in the opening and

Variances in the opening and closing stock
Cost per unit closing stock does not influence
affects the cost per unit.
the cost per unit of output.
Highlights Contribution per unit Net Profit per unit

VALUATION OF PRODUCTS UNDER MARGINAL AND ABSORPTION COSTING
Marginal costing
Product costs Shs
D. Material xxx
D. Labour xxx
V. Production O/H xxx
xxx
Absorption costing
Product costs Shs
D. Material xxx
D. Labour xxx
Fixed O/H xxx
xxx
PREPARATION OF MARGINAL AND ABSORPTION STATEMENTS
Cost of production and profit determination
Marginal Costing
Profit and Loss Statement
Sales xxx
Less: Cost of sales
Opening stock xxx
Add: production cost
D. Material xxx
D. Labour xxx
xxx
Less: Closing stock (xxx) (xxx)
Gross contribution xxx
Less: Other various costs xxx
Net Contribution
Less: Fixed costs
Production xxx
Administration xxx
Selling and distr. xxx (xxx)
N. Profit xxx

Absorption costing
Profit and loss statement
Sales xxx
Less: Cost of sales
Opening stock xxx
Add: production cost
D. Material xxx
D. Labour xxx
I. Production O/H xxx
xxx
Less: Closing stock (xxx) (xxx)
Gross Profit xxx
Less: Operating expenses
Administration xxx
Selling and distr. xxx (xxx)
Net Profit xxx
MARGINAL COSTING AND ABSORPTION COSTING
Example 1
In a period, 20,000 units of Z were produced and sold. Costs and revenues were:
Sh.
Sales 100,000
Production cost: Variable 35,000
Fixed 15,000
Administrative + Selling overheads: Fixed 25,000
Required;-
The operating statements for Z
Solution
Operating statements
Absorption costing approach Marginal costing approach
Sh. Sh. Sh.
Sales 100,000 Sales 100,000
Less production cost of sales 50,000 Less marginal cost 35,000
= Gross profit 50,000 = Contribution 65,000
Less admin + selling 25,000 Less Fixed costs
Overheads - Production 15,000
25,000 Admin S + D 25,000 40,000
Net Profit Net Profit 25,000

The above illustration, although simple, illustrates the general characteristics of both approaches.
The key figure arising in the Marginal statement is the contribution of sh.65,000. The total
amount of contribution arising from product Z (and other products, if any) forms a pool from
which fixed costs are met. Any surplus arising after fixed costs are met becomes the Net profit.
CHANGES IN THE LEVEL OF ACTIVITY

When changes occur in the level of activity, the absorption costing approach may cause some
confusion. In example 1 the activity level was 20,000 units and using the absorption approach,
the profit per unit and cost per unit can be calculated as follows;
Sh.
Selling price per unit 5
Less Total cost per unit Sh.75,000
20,000 3.75
Profit per unit 1.25
If these figures were used as guides to results at any activity level other than 20,000, they would
be incorrect and may mislead. For example, if the level of activity of example 1 changes to
25,000 units, it might be assumed that the total profit would be 25,000 x sh.1.25 = sh.31,150.
However, the results are likely to be as follows:
Operating statement (Absorption approach)

Sh.
Sales (25,000 x 5) 125,000
Less production cost (£35,000 + 15,000) 58,750
= Gross profit 66,250
Less Admin + Selling overheads 25,000
= Net profit 41,250
The difference is, of course, coursed by the incorrect treatment of the fixed cost. In such
circumstances the use of the marginal approach presents a clearer picture. Based on the data in
In Example 1
The marginal cost per unit and the contribution per unit are calculated as follows:
Marginal cost per unit = Sh35,000
20,000
= Sh1.75
Contribution per unit = Sales Price – Marginal cost per unit
= sh5 - sh1.75
= sh3.25

If once again, the activity is increased to 25,000 units, the expected profit would be:
= (25,000 unit x Contribution per unit) – Fixed costs
= (25,000 x sh3.25) - sh40,000
= Sh41,250
And the operation statement on marginal costing lines would be
Sh.
Sales (25,000 ×5) 125,000
Less marginal cost (£25,000 ×1.75) 43,750
= Contribution 81,250
Less Fixed cost 40,000
= Net profit 41,250
Note: Students will note that the marginal cost and contribution per unit are assumed to be
constant and that the fixed costs remain unchanged.
RECONCILIATION OF MARGINAL PROFITS AND ABSORPTION PROFITS
PROFIT RECONCILIATION
There is always a difference between the profits reported using marginal costing and absorption
costing. This is brought about by the difference in stock relation.
In marginal costing, stocks are valued at variable cost of production while in absorption cost they
are valued at total cost.
This causes differences in the amounts that are charged to cost of sales which affects the profit
reported.
Illustration
Langata is a manufacturing company which produces a single product. The following standard
unit costs relate to the product.
Cost Sh.
Variable manufacturing 90
Fixed manufacturing 70
Variable selling and administration 16
Fixed selling and administration 60
236
Fixed manufacturing costs per unit are based on a predetermined absorption rate established at a
normal activity level of 45,000 production unit per period. Fixed selling and administration costs
are absorbed into the cost of sales at 20% of selling price.

Under/over absorbed overheads are transferred to the profit and loss account at the end of the
period
The following information is available for two consecutive periods.

Period 1 Period 2
Sales – units 42,500 45,000
Sales – value (Sh.) 12,750,000 13,500,000
Production units 40,000 46,000
Variable manufacturing costs (Sh.) 3,600,000 4,140,000
Variable selling and administration costs 3,200,000 3,150,000
(Sh.) 680,000 720,000
Fixed selling and administration costs (Sh.) 2,700,000 2,700,000
Required
a) Income statements for each of the two periods under the absorption costing basis
b) Income statements for each of the two periods under the marginal costing basis
c) Reconciliation of the profits under the absorption costing and the marginal costing basis for
each of the periods.
Solution
Marginal and absorption cost
Product cost
Marginal Absorption
Variable manufacturing 90 Variable manufacturing 90
90 Fixed manufacturing 70
160
Income statement using marginal costing

Period 1 Period 2
Sh. Sh. Sh. Sh.
Sales 12,750,000 13,500,000
Less: marginal cost of sales
Opening stock (2500 x 90) 225,000 -
Variable manufacturing 3,600,000 4,140,000
3,825,000 4,140,000
Less closing stock - (3,225,000) (90,000) (4,050,000)
Gross contribution 8,925,000 9,450,000
Less other variables
Variable distribution 680,000 680,000 720,000 720,000

Net contribution 8,245,000 8,730,000
Less fixed costs
Fixed manufacturing 3,200,000 3,150,000
Fixed selling and administration 2,700,000 5,900,000 2,700,000 (5,850,000)
NET PROFIT 2345000 2,880,000
Income statement using absorption costing

PERIOD 1 PERIOD 2
Sh. Sh. Sh. Sh.
SALES 12,750,000 13,500,000
LESS COST OF SALES
Opening stock (2500 x 160) 400,000 -
Variable manufacturing 3,600,000 4,140,000
Fixed manufacturing cost 2,800,000 3,220,000
6,800,000 7,360,000
Less closing stock - 6,800,000 (160,000) (7,200,000)
5,950,000 6,300,000
Less Expenses
Variable selling & distribution 680,000 720,000
Fixed selling & distribution 2,550,000 2,700,000
Under absorbed fixed s/distribution 150,000 70,000
Under absorbed fixed manufacturing 400,000 (3,780,000) - (3,350,000)
cost 2,170,000 2,950,000
Net profit
Fixed Fixed selling & Total

manufacturing distribution Sh.
OHD absorbed Sh. Sh. 5,350,000
Actual OHD 2,800,000 25,500,000 5,900,000
3,200,000 2,700,000 (550,000)
OHD absorbed
Actual OHD 3,220,000 2,700,000
2,150,000 2,720,000
70,000 0

Reconciliation statement for the periods
Shs
Period 1
Profit as per marginal costing 2,345,000
Less: Understatement of opening stock 175,000
Profit as per absorption costing 2,170,000
Period 2
Profit as per marginal costing 2,880,000
Add: Understatement of closing stock 70,000
Profit as per absorption 2,950,000
APPLICATION OF MARGINAL COSTING
Marginal costing is applied internally by management in decision making such as:

i) Cost volume profit analysis (CVP)
ii) Planning
iii) Decision making (non-routine)
iv) cost control
v) measurement of efficiency
vi) Evaluation of profitability
Cost Volume and Profit Analysis (CVP)

Cost volume profit (CVP) analysis is the study of the effects on future profit of changes in fixed
cost, variable costs, sales price quantity and mix.
The purpose of the C.V.P analysis is to understand the relationship amongst the aforesaid
variables to forecast profits, determine the volumes to be achieved to meet target profit, and such
other short term decisions. The CVP analysis is based on the premise of marginal costing.
The marginal costing technique recognizes variable cost as the product costs and fixed costs as
period costs. The principle is that only variable costs will change with a change in volume of
production and sales, but the fixed costs will remain the same.
Cost volume profit (CVP) analysis is a systematic approach of examining the relationship
between changes in volume and changes in total sales, expenses and net profit. The underlying
objective of CVP is to know the effect of fluctuation in the activity volume on financial results.
The following is a typical cost volume profit diagram that depicts how sales revenue, fixed costs
and variable costs respond to changes in the volume of sales and production. The volume of

production and sales is measured by the X-axis and revenue, costs and profit (loss) are measured
by –axis in the CVP chart.
The short run decisions where CVP analysis may be useful include choice of product mix,
product pricing, special order acceptance, shut down of a plant etc.
Assumptions of CVP analysis

1. Revenues, costs and profit functions are assumed to be linear with respect to volumes of
output.
2. Costs can be split into fixed and variable statement
3. Fixed costs remain constant throughout the analysis
4. The selling price per unit remains constant
5. Variable cost per unit remains constant
6. The only factor affecting cost and revenue is output i.e. output is the only revenue and cost
driver
7. Technology in production and efficiency level remains constant.
8. Only production is produced and sold. In case of multiple productions the sale mixture will
remain constant.
9. All units produced will be sold.
Let X: No of units produced and sold/activity level

D= Price per unit
V = Variable cost per unit
F = Fixed costs
R = Total sales revenues in monetary form and activity level in monetary terms.
C = Total costs
TI = Profits
Marginal costs equation

Contribution signifies an alternative measure of profit which is computed as sales less total
variable costs of sales
Accordingly Contribution = Sales – Variables
Contribution for the period provides a pool (since it recognizes a surplus generated by sale
revenue over variable costs) out of which fixed costs for the period are met and any surplus
constitutes the profit. It is called contribution because it literally contributes towards fixed costs
and profit)
Therefore Contribution = Fixed costs + Profit

The elements in tradition break even chart (in a single product situation)
A traditional break even chart records revenues and cost on the vertical axis and volume of
activity on other horizontal axis. The lines representing sales revenue and total costs signify
break-even point.
At any volume level the space between the total cost line and fixed costs line signifies variable
cost. In traditional chart, the fixed cost line is drawn first and thereupon the variable cost is
drawn in order to signify total cost
The contribution break even chart (in a single product situation)

The basic elements of a contribution break even chart are the same as that of the traditional break
even chart.
The only difference is that it shows the variable cost line instead of the fixed cost line. This is
done in order to overcome the major problem with traditional break even chart that it is not
possible to read contribution directly from the chart.
The same lines for total costs and sales revenue are shown so the breakeven point and profit can
be interpreted in the same way as with convectional chart.
The contribution can read as the difference between the sales revenue line and the variable costs
line.
Profit/ volume chart (in simple product situation)

This is yet another mode of presentation of break-even chart. This is also known as contribution
volume graph. In this, a single a single line is drawn depicting the profit or loss at each level of
activity. The point of intersection of the line and the horizontal axis is the breakeven point. The
basic feature of this chart is that the vertical axis indicates profits and losses and the horizontal
axis is drawn at zero profit or loss.
Cost Volume Profit (C.V.P) analysis by formula

C-V-P analysis can be undertaken by graphical means which are dealt with later in this chapter,
or by simple formulae which are listed below and illustrated by examples
a) Break-even point (in units) = Fixed Costs

Contribution/unit
b) C/S Ratio = Contribution/unit x 100

Sales price/unit
c) Break-even point (£sales) = Fixed Costs x Sales price/unit

Contribution/unit

= Fixed Costs x 1
C/S ratio
d) Level of sales to result in target profit (in units) = Fixed Costs + Target profit
Contribution/unit
e) Level of sales to result in target profit after tax (in units)
Fixed Cost + [ Target profit]

1 – Tax rate
=
Contribution/unit
f) Level of sales to result in target profit £sales)

= (Fixed Cost + Target profit) x Sales price/unit
Contribution/unit
Note: The above formulae relate to a single firm or one with an unvarying mix of sales. With a
multi -product firm it is possible to calculate the break- even point as follows:
Break-even point (sh. sales) = Fixed Costs × Sales Value

Contribution
Illustration
A company makes a single product with a sales price sh10 and a marginal cost of sh6. Fixed
costs are sh60,000 per annum.
a) Number of units to break even
b) Sales at break-eve point
c) C/S ratio
d) What number of units will need to be sold to achieve a profit of sh20,000 p.a.?
e) What level of sales will achieve a profit of sh20,000 p.a.?
f) As (d) with a 40% tax rate.
g) Because of increasing costs the marginal cost is expected to rise to £6.50 per unit and fixed
costs to sh70,000 p.a. If the selling price cannot be increased what will be the number of
units required to maintain a profit of £20,000 p.a. (ignore tax)?
Solution
Contribution = Selling price – Marginal Cost
= sh10 - sh6
= sh4
a) Break-even point (units) = sh60,000
4

= 15,000
b) Break-even point (£sales) = 15,000 x sh10
= sh150,000
c) C/S ratio = sh4
10
= 40%
d) Number of units for target profit = sh60,000 + sh20,000
4
= 20,000
e) Sales for target profit = 20,000 x sh10
= 200,000
(Alternatively, this figure can be deduced by the following reasoning. After break-even point the
contribution per unit becomes net profit per unit, so that as 15,000 units were required at break-
even point, 5000 extra units would be required to make sh.20,000 profit.
Therefore total units = 15,000 + 5,000 = 20,000
20,000 x sh10 = sh.200,000
f) Number of units for target profit with 40% tax = 60,000 + sh. 20,000
1-0.4
sh4
= 23,333
g) Note that the fixed costs, marginal cost and contribution have changed
No. of units for target profit = Sh70,000 + sh20,000
Sh3.50
= 25,714 units
Note: The C/S ratio is sometimes known as the P/V ratio
LIMITATIONS OF CVP ANALYSIS

1. It can be time consuming
2. The analysis can only be applied to a single product
3. Where there is difficulty in classifying costs between fixed costs variable , it is difficult
to apply break even analysis
4. At all levels of output , it assumes that the fixed costs are fixed or constant
5. At all levels of output, it assumes that the per unit variable costs are the same or fixed
6. At all levels of output , it assumes that sales price are fixed or constant
7. Inventory is not taken into consideration
8. It is not useful for production planning

Graphical Approach
This may be preferred

a) Where a simple overview is sufficient
b) Where there is a need to avoid a detailed, numerical approach when, for example, the
recipients of the information have no accounting background.
The basic chart is known as a Break Even chart which can be drawn in two ways. The first is
known as the traditional approach and the second as the contribution approach. Whatever
approach is adopted, all costs must be capable of separation into fixed and variable elements, i.e.
semi-fixed or semi-variable costs must be analysed into their components.
The Traditional Break-Even Chart

Assuming that fixed and variable costs have been resolved, the chart is drawn in the following
way:
a) Draw the axes
Horizontal: showing levels of activity expressed as units of output or as percentages of total
capacity.
Vertical: showing values of sh. ’s or sh. 00s as appropriate for costs and revenues.
b) Draw the cost lines
Fixed cost. This will be a straight line parallel to the horizontal axis at the level of the fixed
costs.
Total cost. This will start where the fixed cost line intersects the vertical axis and will be a
straight line slopping upward at an angle depending on the proportion of variable cost in total
costs.
c) Draw the revenue line
This will be a straight line from the point of origin sloping upwards at an angle determined by
the selling price.
Illustration
A company makes a single product with a total capacity of 400,000 litres p.a. Cost and sales
data are as follows:
Selling price sh.1 per litre
Marginal cost sh.0.50 per litre
Fixed costs sh.100, 000
Draw a traditional break-even chart showing the likely profit at the expected production level of
300,000 litres.

Solution
From Figure belowit will be seen that break-even point is at an output level of 200,000 litres and
that the width of the profit wedge indicates the profit at a production level of 300,000. The profit
is sh.50,000.
Traditional Break-Even Chart
Profit at anticipated c
400 - Sales
production level
Sh. 000 Profit
300 - Break Even d

Point
b
200 -
Margin Variable Cost
of
a Safety Total Cost
100 -
Loss
Fived Cost
f
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Output (000 litres)
Notes: The ‘margin of safety’ indicated on the chart is the term given to the difference between
the activity level selected and break-even point. In this case the margin of safety is 100,000
litres.
The Contribution Break-Even Chart

This uses the same axes and data as the traditional chart. The only difference being that variable
costs are drawn on the chart before fixed costs resulting in the contribution being shown as a
wedge.
Illustration
By using the illustration above except that a contribution break-even chart should be drawn.

Solution (see the following figure below)
c
Sales
400 -
Profit
Sh. 000
300 - Break Even d
Point
b Fixed
200 - Cost
Contribution e
a Total Cost
100 -
Loss
Fived Cost
0 f
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Output (000 litres)
Notes:
a) The area c.o.e represents the contribution earned. There is no direct equivalent on the
traditional chart.
b) The area of d.a.o.f represents total cost and is the same as the traditional chart.
c) It will be seen from the chart that the reversal of fixed costs and variable costs enables the
contribution wedge to be drawn thus providing additional information.
An alternative form of the contribution break-even chart is where the net difference between
sales and variable cost i.e. total contribution, is plotted against fixed costs. This is shown in
Figure below once again using the same data as in the illustration above.
Notes on figure below

a) Sales and variable costs are not shown directly.
Both forms contribution chart, figures above and below, show clearly that contribution is first
used to meet fixed costs and when these costs are met, the contribution becomes profit

Alternative Form of Contribution Break Even Chart
400 -
Sh. 000
300 -
200 - Break Even

Point Profit
b
100 -
Loss
Loss
Contribution
Fixed Cost
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

Output (000 litres)
Optimizing the Level of Activity
Where the cost and/or revenue functions are non-linear, for example as shown in figure 14.14,
then it is possible to determine the optimal level of activity in accordance with the objectives of
the firm. This can be done in two ways, either by drawing graphs of the functions as in figure
14.14 and 14.15 or more directly by the use of differential calculus. It will be recalled that the
process of differentiation provides a ready means of finding the rates of change of non-linear
functions and of their turning points. If the non-linear functions represent cost and revenue then
the rates of change are marginal cost and marginal revenue respectively and the turning points of
the functions are the point of minimum cost and maximum revenue respectively.
The following example uses differentiation to find the optimal activity level.
Illustration
A firm has the following cost and revenue functions:
Variable cost function, c = sh. + 10
Demand function, p = sh. 150 +
Where P = price in sh.
c = Variable cost in sh’s
q = number of units sold per period
The fixed costs are sh.1,000 per period.
It is required to determine
a) The price, quantity and resulting profit if the firm’s objective is to maximize sales
revenue.
b) The price, quantity and resulting profit if the firm’s objective is to maximize profit.

Solution
a) Let R = revenue
Then R=pq
= (150 - )q
= 150q -
For maximum revenue, = 0 (with a negative second derivative).
Thus 150 - 1 =0
(Note that = - 1½ i.e. negative, as required for a maximum point)
∴ q = 100 at maximum revenue point.
∴ q = £ 150 −
= sh. 150 − (100)

= sh.75
∴R=pq
= (sh. 75 100)
= sh.7,500
Profit at maximum revenue point is:

Shs
Revenue 7,500
Less: Costs = (100) + 10(100)sh. + 1,000 (7,000)
500
Profit per period
b) For maximum profit, marginal revenue should equal marginal cost.

i.e.
=
1
= 150 − 1 = q + 10
2
∴ 150 − 1 = q + 10
Giving, after some re-arrangement : q = 56 at maximum profit point

The resulting price per unit is: p= sh. 150 −
= sh. 108
Profit at maximum profit point is
Sh.
Revenue sh. (56 x 108) 6,048
Less: Costs = sh. (56) + 10(56) + 1,000 3,128
2,920
Profit per period
SIMPLIFIED DECISION PROBLEM
They are a onetime decisions but once made they remain binding for a long period of time.
In making these decisions it is only the relevant costs that are considered i.e. irrelevant cost are
not taken into account.
Relevant costs.
The term relevant pertinent to the decision at hand, Relevant costs represent those future costs
that will be changed by a particular decision. They are the costs appropriate to a specific
management decision.
Relevant costs are costs that change with respect to a particular decision. Sunk costs are never
relevant. Future costs may or may not be relevant. If the future costs are going to be incurred
regardless of the decision that is made, those costs are not relevant. Committed costs are future
costs that are not relevant. Even if the future costs are not committed, if we anticipate incurring
those costs regardless of the decision that we make, those costs are not relevant. The only costs
that are relevant are those that differ as between the alternatives being considered.
Including sunk costs in a decision can lead to a poor choice. However, including future irrelevant
costs generally will not lead to a poor choice; it will only complicate the analysis. For example,
if I am deciding whether to buy a Toyota Camry or a Subaru Legacy, and if my auto insurance
will be the same no matter which car I buy, my consideration of insurance costs will not affect
my decision, although it will slightly complicate the analysis.
Rules about relevant costs

1. Only relevant costs should be considered when revaluating the financial consequences of a
decision. This is because a decision is forward looking.

2. A relevant cost is a future cash flow that will arise or be reduced as a direct consequence of
the decision.
3. A relevant cost is a future cost. This means that any cost that has been incurred in the past
(historical cost cannot be relevant to a decision.
4. A relevant cost is a cash flow. Any costs that are not cash flow items are not relevant. E.g.
non-cash charges such as depreciation of fixed assets.
- Notional costs such as notional interest charges and
- Absorbed fixed overheads.
5. A relevant cost is one that will arise as a direct consequence of decision being taken.
If a decision is a future cash flow that would be incurred anyway regardless of the decision
hence should be ignored.
6. As general rule, variable costs are relevant and fixed costs are unchanged regardless of a
decision hence irrelevant.
Determination of relevant costs

i) Direct material cost
a) Expected purchase cost of materials is relevant cost
b) Stocks that have already been purchased. Their original purchase cost is irrelevant as a
sunk cost. However the current purchase price (account paid to replace such stocks) if
used is relevant cist
c) Stocks in store but with no use except
i) Be resold
The relevant cost is the resale value if the materials are used in a decision disposed.
ii) Be disposed
It used on a decision, the disposal cost will not be incurred and therefore will be
treated as an opportunity savings hence relevant.
iii) Be used as a substitute material for another
It is used on a decision the alternative material will have to be purchased; therefore
the purchase cost of this material becomes relevant.
ii) Direct labour cost

a) Amount paid to employee to execute a duty in a decision is relevant cost.
b) It labour is in short supply that cares, there may be two options
 Work overtime –relevant cost will be will the normal wages + overtime premium
 To divert from current production
Relevant cost will be the normal wage + the lost contribution from the fewer units
produced in normal production due to labour diversion.
NB: If both are available in a decision, select whichever is cheaper
c) If labour is idle that is excess labour force which is un-utilized

Use of this labour in a decision means utilization of excess hours and the about cost will
be irrelevant
iii) Overheads
Variable overheads
It is an incremental cost which varies with activity level and it is therefore relevant
Fixed overheads
It is expected to remain constant irrespective of activity level and therefore irrelevant.
However, if there is actual increase arising from a decision made, the amount of increase is
relevant cost
Illustration
A company has spent Sh.100, 000 acquiring patent rights to manufacture a product. It hopes to
sell 30,000 units at a selling price of Sh.10 each and the variable costs of production will be Sh.7
per unit.
Should the company proceed with production?
Solution
Sh.100, 000 is known as a past cost or a sunk cost. That money is gone and what the company
has to do is to concentrate on future cash flows. The future cash flows will generate a
contribution of:
30,000 × (Sh.10 - Sh.7) = Sh.90, 000
Therefore, proceeding with production will increase the company’s wealth, so it should proceed.
[Note: The incorrect approach would be to look at all costs: 30,000 (Sh.10 - Sh.7) - Sh.100, 000
= - Sh.10, 000. This incorrect because the business has no control over the past cost of Sh.
100,000. The company has to make the best of what can be done in the future.]
Illustration
A company rents a factory for sh.100, 000 per year. Half of the factory is already occupied by a
machine. The company is considering installing an additional machine which would produce
20,000 units for a variable cost of sh.5 per unit. These units would sell for sh.7 each. Half of the
factory rent would be apportioned to the new machine.
Should the company purchase new machine?

Solution
The factory rent of sh.100, 000 will be paid irrespective of whether the factory is empty, has one
machine or two machines. It is a fixed cost, is non-incremental and is therefore irrelevant to the
decision.
The new machine will generate a contribution of 20,000 × (sh.7 - sh.5) = sh.40, 000
The new machine should therefore be purchased.
Illustration
A company is considering installing a machine which would produce 20,000 units for a variable
cost of sh.5 per unit. These units would sell for sh.7 each. Additional space would have to be
rented at a cost of sh.50, 000.
Should the company take on this project?
Solution
Here the rent of sh.50, 000 is an incremental cost and is therefore relevant to the decision.
The new machine will generate a contribution of 20,000× (sh.7 - sh.5) - sh.50, 000 = - sh.10,
000.
Therefore, the project should not be taken on.
Illustration
A company has some inventory that was bought for sh.10, 000.
 It could be sold for sh.4, 000 or used to make a product that would sell for sh.15, 000.
 There is no other use for the inventory.
Additional costs needed to convert the inventory into the product are sh.9, 000. The material
could be bought now for sh.8, 000
Required;-
What should the company do?
Solution
The sh.10, 000 cost of the inventory is irrelevant: it is a sunk or past cost.
The sh.8, 000 current price is irrelevant because the company has no use for the material so
would not buy more.
The sh.4, 000 resale value of the inventory is relevant as the company could receive that cash by
selling the inventory. Therefore, sh.4, 000 is a future incremental cash flow. If the company
keeps the inventory and produces the product sh.4, 000 will not be obtained and the sh.4, 000 is
known as an opportunity cost.
If the company proceeds with the new product, the incremental cash flows will be:

Sh.
Sales revenue 15,000
Conversion costs (9,000)
Opportunity cost of not selling the material (4,000)
Contribution 2,000
Illustration
A 1 year contract has been offered which will utilize an existing machine that is only suitable for
such contract work. The machine cost shs.25, 000 five years ago and has been depreciated
£4,000 per year on a straight line basis and thus has a book value of shs.5,000. The machine
could be sold now for shs. 8,000 or in 1 years’ time for sh.1000. Four types of material would be
needed for the contract as follows:
Units Price per unit

Material In stock Required for Purchase Current Buying- Current
contract Price of in Price Resale Price
stock sh. sh.
sh.
W 1,200 300 1.80 1.50 1.20
X 200 1,100 0.75 2.80 2.10
Y 3,000 600 0.50 0.80 0.60
Z 1,800 1,200 1.80 2.00 1.90
W and Z are in regular use within the firm. X could be sold if not used for the contract and there
are no other uses for Y, which has been deemed to be obsolete.
Required;
What are the relevant costs in connection with the contract (ignoring the time value of money)?
Solution
Machine costs. The historic cost is a sunk cost and is not relevant. The depreciation details given
relate to accounting conventions and are not relevant.
The relevant cost is the opportunity cost caused by the reduction in resale value over the one year
duration of the contract, i.e. sh.8000 – 1000 = sh.7,000.
Material costs.
W
Although there is sufficient in stock the use of 300 units for the contract would necessitate the
need for replenishment at the current market price.

∴ Relevant cost = 300 x sh.1.50 = sh.450
X
If the contract were not accepted 200 units of X could be sold at sh. 2.10 per unit. The balance of
900 units required would be bought at the current buying-in price of sh.2.80.
Sh.
∴ Relevant cost = 200 x sh.2.10 = 420
900 x sh.2.80 2540
= 2,940
Y
If the 600 units were used on the contract they could not be sold so the opportunity cost is the
current resale price of sh.0.60 per unit.
∴ Relevant cost = 600 × sh.0.60 = sh.360
Z
Similar reasoning applies to W, i.e. replenishment at current buying in price.
∴ Relevant cost = 1200 × sh.2 = sh. 2,400
.70,000 .20,000
No. of units for target profit =
.3.50
= 25,714 units
Note: The Contribution /Sales (C/S) ratio is sometimes known as the Profit/Volume(C/V) ratio.
Illustration
Plasma plc. deals in plastic buckets and bottles. It is uses polystyrene for manufacturing buckets,
and polyethylene terephthalate for manufacturing bottles. For every unit of bucket and bottle, it
requires 0.5 kg of the required raw material, each.
Plasma has received a bulk order for 1000 buckets and 800 bottles, and is evaluating this order.
The data relating to the raw material requirements are as follows
Polystyrene Polyethylene
terephthalate
Required quantity for the order 500 kg 400 kg
Inventory in hand 150 kg 80 kg
Original cost of inventory in hand (sh./kg) 60 80
Current purchase price of materials (sh./kg) 65 74
Current resale price of the materials 66 60
(sh./kg)

Polystyrene is regularly used by the company in the production of buckets. However, plasma has
decided to stop using the production of bottles and so polyethylene terephthalate is no longer in
use by the company and it has no alternative use within the business.
Required;-
What is the total relevant cost of materials for the project?
Solution
Relevant costs are cost related to a future decision
As mentioned in the given case plasma has stopped the production of bottles and the related raw
material has no alternative use. Hence it can be said that those materials can be sold in the
market.
However, plasma has received a bulk order for buckets and bottles. Hence those materials will be
used for the production of the bulk order.
The relevant cost of the required raw materials can be calculated as follows;-
Sh.
Cost of raw materials required for the production of
buckets 32,500
(500 kg × sh65)
Cost of materials required for the production of bottles 23,680
(320 kg ×74)
Opportunity cost of the raw materials required for the 4,800
production of bottles (80 kg × 60) 60,980
Relevant cost
ACCEPT OR REJECT DECISIONS

Products are normally sold at cost plus profit and capacity may remain un-utilized due to demand
constraints at the current selling price.
Companies may consider accepting offers at price below the current price so as to utilize idle
capacity
If the revenue covers the relevant cost, the offer should be accepted
Other factors to be considered for an accept or reject decision to be considered. They include;-
 The firms policy regarding the selling price

 Possibility of future demand of the company’s product
 Whether the fixed cost will remain constant
 Effect on other sales especially when the existing customers learn about the reduced selling
price
 Available idle capacity
Illustration
TSLM Company Ltd. manufactures clothing and sells directly to clothing retailers. One of its
departments manufactures T-shirts. The department has a production capacity of 80,000 T-shirts
per month.
Currently, the company has excess capacity which has resulted from liquidation of one of its
major customers in the month of April 2012. For the next quarter, monthly production and sales
volume is expected to be 50,000 T-shirts.
The expected costs and revenues per T-shirt at this activity level are as follows:
Sh.
Direct materials 35
Direct labour 50
Production overheads: Variable 8
Fixed 30
Marketing and distribution costs 12
Total costs 135
Selling price 160
Profit 25
1. TSLM Company Ltd. is expecting an upsurge in demand and considers that the excess
capacity is temporary.
2. ABC Ltd. has offered to buy for its employees 2,000 T-shirts each month for the next three
months at a price of Sh.95 per T-shirt.
3. ABC Ltd. would collect the T-shirts from TSLM Company Ltd. factory and thus no
marketing and distribution costs will be incurred.
4. ABC Ltd. would require its logo to be imprinted on the T-shirts. This would cost TSLM
Company Ltd. an extra Sh.5 per T-shirt.
5. TSLM Company Ltd. has an agreement with its employees that entitles the employees at
least six months’ notice in the event of any redundancies.

6. No subsequent sales to this customer are anticipated.
Required:
Advise TSLM Company Ltd. whether to accept or reject the offer from ABC Ltd.
Solution
Accept or reject offer
Relevant costs
Sh.
Direct materials 35
Direct labour 50
Variable OHDs 8
Additional cost 5
Total cost 98
Offer price to ABC = 95
Advice;
Reject the offer because the selling price is below the cost of production
DROPPING A PRODUCT
From time to time management will be faced with the problem of deciding to abandon an
unprofitable activity. This is really a least-cost alternative decision and so made on the criterion
of relative marginal costs.
It is sometimes suggested that, where a given product is apparently making a loss, manufacture
and/or marketing of this product should cease, to improve the company’s overall profit
performance.
Illustration
A company produces three products for which the following operating statement has been
produced:
Product X ProductY Product Z Total

Sh. Sh. Sh. Sh.
Sales 32,000 50,000 45,000 127,000
Total Costs 36,000 38,000 34,000 108,000
Profit/(Loss) (4,000) 12,000 11,000 19,000

The total cost comprise 2/3 variable 1/3 fixed.
The directors consider that as product X shows a loss it should be discontinued.
Required
Based on the above cost data should product X be dropped?
What other factors should be considered?
Solution
First calculate the fixed costs, as: 1/3 (36,000) + 1/3(38,000) + 1/3(34,000) = Sh.36,000
Rearrange the operating statement in marginal costing form:
Product X Product Y Product Z Total
Sh. Shs Sh. Shs
Sales 32,000 50,000 45,000 127,000
Less marginal Costs 24,000 25,333 22,667 72,000
= CONTRIBUTION 8,000 24,667 22,333 55,000
Less Fixed 36,000
Cost 19,000
= Net Profit
From this it will be seen that product X produces a contribution of sh. 8,000.
Should it be dropped the position would be:
Shs
Contribution Product Y 24,667
Contribution Product Z 22,333
Total contribution 47,000
Less Fixed Assets 36,000
=Net Profit 11,000
Thus dropping Product X with an apparent loss of sh.4,000 reduces total profits by sh.8,000
which is, of course, the amount of contribution lost from Product X. Other factors which need to
be considered:
a) Although Product X does provide some contribution, it is at a low rate and alternative, more
profitable products or markets should be considered.
b) The assumption above was that the fixed costs were general fixed costs which would remain
even if X was dropped. If dropping X results in the elimination of the fixed costs originally
apportioned to X, then the elimination would be worthwhile. However, this is unlikely.

MAKE OR BUY DECISIONS
This involves evaluating whether it will be advantageous to manufacture items or to purchase the
items from outside suppliers.
Outsourcing is the process of obtaining goods or services from outside suppliers of providing the
same services within the organization.
In arriving on such a make or buy decision, the price asked by the outside supplier should be
compared with the marginal cost of producing the component parts. Other consideration
affecting the decision is:
i) Continuity and control of supply e.g. can be the outsource company be relied upon to meet
the requirement in terms of quality, delivery dates and price stability.
ii) Alternatives use of resources. Can resource used make this article be transferred.
The choice between making or buying a given component is one which is likely to face all
businesses at some time. It is often one of the most important decisions for management for the
critical effect on profits that may ensue. The choice is critical, too, for the management
accountant who provides the cost data on which the decision is ultimately based.
A make or buy problem involves a decision by an organisation about whether it should make a
product or carry out an activity with its own internal resources or whether it should pay another
organisation to carry out the activity. The make option gives management more direct control
over the work, but the buy option may have benefits in that the external organisation has
expertise and special skills in the work making it cheaper.
There are certain situations where the make or buy decision is not really a choice at all. There
can be no alternative to making, where product design is confidential or the methods of
processing are kept secret. On the other hand, patents held by suppliers may preclude the use of
certain techniques and then there is no choice other than buying or going without. The supplier
who has developed a special expertise or who uses highly specialized equipment may produce
better-quality work which suggests buying rather than making. In other cases, the special
qualities demanded in the product may not be available outside and so making becomes
necessary.
Where technical considerations do not influence the make or buy decision, the choice becomes
one of selecting the least-cost alternative in each decision situation. Comparative cost data are
necessary, therefore, to determine whether it is cheaper to make or to buy. In general this
requires a comparison of the respective marginal costs or, in some cases, the incremental costs of
each alternative. Incremental costs are relevant in decisions which include capacity changes. For
example, a certain component has always been bought out because the plant and equipment for
its manufacture has not been installed in the factory. When considering the alternative to buying,
the cost of making comprises all the incremental costs (including additional fixed expenditure)

arising from the decision. The incremental cost also includes the opportunity cost of the
investment in capital equipment, that is, the expected return from an alternative investment
opportunity. A decision to buy a part which has previously been manufactured may release
capacity for other uses or for disposal so that the incremental cost of the decision also includes
the relevant fixed cost savings
Illustration
The availability of Material B is limited to 8,000 kg

Product A B C
Demand (units) 2,000 2,500 4,000
Variable cost to make (sh. per unit 12 14 16
Buy-in price (sh. per unit) 15 19 18
Kg of B required per unit 3 2 1
(included in variable cost)
Which products should the company make and which should it buy?
Solution
A B C
Sh. Sh. Sh.
Buy-in price 15 19 18
Cost to make 12 14 16
Saving (per unit) –sh. 3 5 2
Kg of B 3 2 1
Saving per kg -sh. 1 2.50 2
Ranking 3 1 2
Product Units Material B(kg)

B MAKE 2,500 5,000
C MAKE 3,000 3,000
8,000kg
C BUY 1,000
A BUY 2,000

Illustration
A firm is considering whether to manufacture or purchase a particular component 2543 .This
would be in batches of 10,000 and the buying in price would be sh6.50 per unit. The marginal
cost of manufacturing Component 2543 is sh4.75 per unit and the component would have to be
made on a machine which was currently working at full capacity. If the component was
manufactured, it is estimated that the sales of finished product FP97 would be reduced by 1000
units. FP97 has a marginal cost of sh60/unit and sells for sh80/unit. Should the firm manufacture
or purchase Component 2543
Solution
A superficial view, based on the preceding example, is that because the marginal cost of
manufacture is substantially below the buying in price, the component should not be bought in
and thus further analysis is unnecessary. However, such an approach is insufficient in this more
realistic situation and consideration must be given to the loss of contribution from the displaced
product.
Cost analysis - Component 2543 in batches of 10,000
Sh.
Marginal Cost of manufacturer = sh4.75/unit x 10,000 47,500
+ Lost contribution for FP97 = sh20/unit x 1000 20,000
67,500
Buying in price = sh6.50/unit x 10,000 65,000
There is a saving of Sh.2,500 per 10,000 batch by buying in rather than manufacture.
Note: The lost contribution of sh.20,000 is an example of an opportunity cost.. This is the value
of a benefit sacrificed in favor of some alternative course of action. Where there is no alternative
use for the resource, as in Example 4, then the opportunity cost is zero and can thus be ignored.
OPERATING STATEMENTS
An income statement is a core financial statement that presents a company's operating results
over a specific period of time, often quarterly or annually. Also known as an operating statement,
an earnings report, or a profit and loss statement (P&L), an income statement starts with
revenues and then subtracts costs and expenses (such as cost of goods, depreciation,
amortization, and taxes) to calculate net income. Along with a balance sheet, a retained earnings
statement, and a cash flow statement, an income statement is one of the key financial statements
that summarize the finances of a company.

All companies need to generate revenue to stay in business. They use revenues to pay expenses,
interest payments on debt, and taxes owed to the government. After these costs of doing business
are paid, the amount left over is called net income. Net income is theoretically available to
shareholders, though instead of paying out dividends, the firm’s management often chooses to
retain earnings for future investment in the business
Anyone interested in active investing, picking stocks or investigating the financial health of a
company must know how to read financial statements, including the statement of operations. The
importance of the information contained in the statement of operations cannot be
overemphasized.
A firm’s ability or inability to generate earnings over the long term is the key driver of stock and
bond prices. Operating profit (EBIT) is the source of debtrepayment, and if a company can’t
generate enough EBIT to pay its debt obligations, it will have to enter bankruptcy or sell itself.
Net income is the source of compensation to shareholders (owners of the company), and if a
company cannot generate enough profit to compensate owners for the risks they’ve taken, the
value of the owners’ shares will plummet. Conversely, if a company is healthy and growing,
higher stock and bond prices will reflect the increased availability of profits.
REVISION EXERCISE
QUESTION ONE
The following information has been extracted from the books of Solarcross Ltd for the year to 31
March 2000:
Units ‘000’
Production 30
Sales 24
Production cost incurred: Sh. ‘000’
Direct material 7,200
Direct labour 1,800
Variable overheads 1,500
Fixed overheads 2,700
Selling and administrations costs:
Sales and salaries 450
Variable sales commission 300
Promotion and advertising 480
Other fixed costs 720
The company’s unit selling price is Sh 550.

Required:
a) Profit and loss statement under direct costing approach.
b) Profit and loss statement under indirect costing approach.
c) An explanation of the difference in profit or loss in (a) and (b) above
Solution:
a)
Solacross Limited
Profit and Loss Statement for the year ended 31st March 2000:
Using Direct Costing Approach
Shs ‘000’ Shs ‘000’
Sales: (24,000 ×550) 13,200
Cost of Sales
Direct Material 7,200× 24,000 5,760
30,000
Direct labour 1,800× 24,000 1,440
30,000
Variable Overheads 1,500× 24,000 1,200 (8,400)
30,000
GROSS CONTRIBUTION 4,800
Less: Variable Sales Commission 300× 24,000 (240)
30,000
Net Contribution 4,560
Expenses: Fixed costs of selling &
Administration
Fixed overheads (of production) 2,700
Sales salaries 450
Other fixed costs 720 (4,350)
NET PROFIT 210
b)
Solacross Limited
Profit and Loss Statement for the year ended 31st March 2000
Using the Indirect Costing Method
Shs ‘000’ Shs ‘000’

Sales: 13,200
Less Cost of Sales:

Production costs: (7,200 + 1,800 + 1,500 + 720) 13,200
Less: Closing Stock: (13,200 x 6,000)
30,000 (2,640) 10,560
Gross profit 2,640
Expenses of Selling and Administration
Sales Salaries 450
Variable Selling Commission 300
Other fixed costs 720 (1,950)
Net profit 690
Differences in the profit using the direct and indirect costing approaches arise due to the
valuation of stocks. In the direct method, cost of stocks is only variable costs while in the
indirect method, the costs of stocks is made up of both variable costs and the fixed production
overheads.
In direct costing, fixed production overheads are fully written off or expensed on period costs. In
indirect approach, part of them are carried forward in closing stocks to be written off in the next
accounting period.
QUESTION TWO
.
a) The following data relate to Kenya Ltd for the year ended 31 December 1999.
Sh. ‘000’
Sales 24,000
Less: Total costs 20,000
Net profit 4,000
Fixed costs account for 40% of the total costs.

Required:
i) Margin of safety.
ii) Break-even point in sales
iii) Sales required to earn profit of Sh 6,000,000.
iv) In order to increase sales, the management has the following two options:
1.To increase sales by 25% on incurring a sales promotion cost of Sh 2,500,000.
2.To increase sales by 15% on reducing selling price by 5%.

b) Advise the management on which option they should take.
Solution:
Kenya Limited:
Shs. ‘000’
Sales 24,000
Less: variable costs @ 60% x 20 million: (12,000)
Contribution: 12,000
Less: fixed costs @ 40% x 20 million (8,000)
NET PROFIT 4,000
(i) Margin of Safety = Current Sales – Break even Sales
But Break Even Sales = Fixed Costs = 8,000,000

Contribution margin ratio [12,000,000/24,000,000]
= Shs 16,000,000
Margin of Safety = 24,000,000 – 16,000,000 = Shs 8,000,000
(ii) Break Even point in Sales = Fixed Cost = 8,000,000____

Contribution Margin Ratio (120,000,000/24,000,000)
(iii) Sales required to earn a profit of Shs 6,000,000. = Shs 16,000,000
= Fixed Costs + Target Profits = (8,000,000 + 6,000,000) = Shs 28,000,000

Contribution sales ratio (12million/24 million
(iv) Option 1: Fixed costs will rise by Sh 2.5m.

2: Variable cost to sales ratio will be 50/95.
Profit Statements
Option 1 Option 2
Shs ‘000’ Shs ‘000’
Sales 30,000 27,600
Variable costs (50%) (15,000) (14,526)
Contribution 15,000 13,074
Fixed costs (10,500) (8,000)
NET PROFIT 4,500 5,074

NB: Initial profit was Shs 4,000,000.
Advise to Management: decrease sales price by 5% as this will result in the highest netprofit.
QUESTION THREE
Jamii Company Ltd manufactures and sells a single product. The following information
regarding the company’s operations for the year ended 30 September 2001 was presented to you.
Profit and loss account for the year ended 30 September 2001
Sh. ‘000’ Sh. ‘000’

Sales 30,000
Less:
Production costs
Direct material 6,500
Direct labour 5,400
Production overhead variable 7,000
Prime costs 18,900
11,100
Other expenses;-
Selling – Variable 2,600
- Cost 1,997
Administration 2,100 6,697
Net profit 4,403
The following changes are expected to occur during the year ending 30 September 2002:
1. Selling price will be adjusted downward by 3% in order to attract more customers.

2. Material prices will rise by 2% due to inflation.
3. There will be a reduction in labour cost of 4%.
4. Production overheads will increase by 3%.
5. Increase in the efficiency of sales persons will reduce direct selling costs by 5%.
All other factors are expected to remain constant.
Required:
a) Break-even point in sales value
b) The margin of safety in sales value
c) The sales value at which profit of Sh. 4.5 million will be achieved
d) A summary operating statement that shows the net profit of Sh. 4.5 million above.

Solution:
Sh. Sh. Sh.

‘000’ ‘000’ ‘000’
Sales 30,000 × 0.97 29,100
Less Cost of Sales
Materials 6,500 × 1.02 6,630
Labour 5,400 ×0.96 5,184
Production overhead (7,000 × 7,210 (19,024)
Cost of Sales 1.03) 10,076
Less other variable costs (2,470)
Contribution (2,600 × 7,606
Less Expense 0.95)
Fixed 1,997
Administration 2,100 (4,097)
NET PROFIT 3,509
a) B.E.P (shs) = Fixed Costs = 4,097,000 x 29,100,000

C/S ratio 7,606,000
= shs 15,674,823
b) Margin of Safety = Budgeted sales – Break even sales

= 29,100,000 – 15674823
= shs 13,425,177
c) Sales value at which profit of sh. 4.5m will be achieved.
Use:
Profit = (P – V) X – Fixed costs
when X is sales in units.
Profit = C/S X – Fixed Costs.

when X is sales in shs.
P – selling price per unit
V- variable cost per unit
C/S – contribution sales ratio

Profit = C/S X – Fixed costs
4,500,000 = 7,606 X – 4,097,000

29100
X = Shs. 32,891,493.
d) Sales 32,891,493
Less Cost of Sales 24,294,493
CONTRIBUTION 8,597,000
Less Expenses (4,097,000)
NET PROFIT 4,500,000

TOPIC 8
BUDGETING AND BUDGETARY CONTROL
Nature and Purposes of Budgets
A budget is a financial plan for the future concerning the revenues and costs of a business.
However, a budget is about much more than just financial numbers.
Budgetary control is the process by which financial control is exercised within an

organisation.
Budgets for income/revenue and expenditure are prepared in advance and then compared with
actual performance to establish any variances.
Managers are responsible for controllable costs within their budgets and are required to take
remedial action if the adverse variances arise and they are considered excessive.
A number of purposes of budgeting have been identified. They include:
1. Coordination
The budgetary process requires that visible detailed budgets are developed to cover each
activity, department or function in the organization. This is only possible when the effort
of one department’s budget is related to the budget of another department. In this way,
coordination of activities, function and department is achieved.
2. Communication
The full budgeting process involves liaison and discussion among all levels of
management. Both vertical and horizontal communication is necessary to ensure proper
coordination of activities. The budget itself may also act as a tool of communication of
what is expected of the departments and managers. High standards set calls for hard work
and more input in terms of labour, time and other resources.
3. Control
This is the process for comparing actual results with the budgeted results and reporting
upon variances. Budgets set a control gauge, which assists to accomplish the plans set
within agreed expenditure limits. The approach followed in the control process has five
basic steps:
i) Preparation of budgets based on the predetermined data on performance and prices.
ii) Measurement of actual performance and recording the data.
iii) Comparing the budget with the actual performance and recording the difference.
iv) Ascertaining reasons for the differences through, including others, variance analysis.
v) Taking corrective actions through administering of proper strategies and measures.

4. Motivation
Budgets may be seen as a bargaining process in which managers compete with each other
for scarce resources. Budgets set targets, which have to be achieved. Where budgetary
targets are tightly set, some individuals will be positively motivated towards achieving
them. Involvement of managers in the preparation of budgets motivates them towards
achieving the goals they have set themselves. However, imposing budgets on managers
will be discouraging as they may perceive the targets as unattainable.
5. Clarification of Responsibility and Authority

Budgetary process necessitates the organization of a business into responsibility and
budget centers with clear lines of responsibilities of each manager. This reduces
duplication of efforts. Each manager manages those items directly under his or her
control. To facilitate effective responsibility accounting, authority and responsibility
relationship must be balanced.
6. Planning
It is by Budgetary Planning that long-term plans are put into action. Planning involves
determination of objectives to be attained at a future predetermined time. When monetary
values are attached to plans they become budgets. Good planning without effective
control is time wasted. Unless plans are laid down in advance, there are no objectives
towards which control can be affected.
PREPARATION OF BUDGETS
MASTER BUDGET
A master budget is a set of interconnected budgets of sales, production costs, purchases,

incomes, etc. and it also includes pro forma financial statements. A budget is a plan of future
financial transactions. A master budget serves as planning and control tool to the management
since they can plan the business activities during the period on the basis of master budget. At the
end of each period, actual results can be compared with the master budget and necessary control
actions can be taken.
Components of Master Budget
Master budget has two major sections which are the operational budget and the financial budget.
They have following components:
Operational Budget
1. Sales Budget
2. Production Budget
3. Direct Material Purchases Budget
4. Direct Labor Budget
5. Overhead Budget
6. Selling and Administrative Expenses Budget
7. Cost of Goods Manufactured Budget
Financial Budget
1. Schedule of Expected Cash Receipts from Customers

2. Schedule of Expected Cash Payments to Suppliers
3. Cash Budget
4. Budgeted Income Statement
5. Budgeted Balance Sheet
Note that all of the above component budgets may not be included in the master budget of every
business. Some of these such as production budget and cost of goods manufactured budget are
not need by a non-manufacturing business.
FUNCTIONAL BUDGET
Functional budget are prepared for an individual function. For each operation in the organization a budget
is prepared
Sales budget, purchases budget, production budget, cash budget etc. are ex ample of functional budget.
This budget are consolidated to arrive at a master budget
Usefulness
a) A functional budget give target to the individual functional manager
b) Those who actually implement the budget prepare the functional budget. They are familiar with the
problems at the grassroots level. Therefore the budgets are more realistic and motivating.
Problems
(a) As the functional manager prepares the functional budget, the target may not be in line with the
strategic objectives or may conflict with the organizational objectives or inter departmental
objectives. This problem can be avoided by encouraging co-ordination between the functional
managers.
(b) Functional budgets are based on forecasts. There are many extern al as well as well as internal
environmental factors (such as a change in demand for a product, non-availability of a particular raw
material high attrition causing shortages of skilled labour, etc.)that affect the functional budgets. If
these factors behave differently than predicted, this may render the budgetary system ineffective
Production budget
The production budget is usually expressed in quantity and represents the sales budget adjusted for
opening closing finished stocks and work in progress.

It summarizes the production requirements for the forthcoming period to match the forecasted sales
above. Budgeting of ending inventory is crucial as it ensures that economic stock levels are maintained
i.e. no excess stocks are carried thus minimizing on holding costs and avoiding tying of capital and that
there is adequate level inventory in to avoid shortage costs and unnecessary ordering costs. The
production budget is expressed as units of each type of product. Various factors considered while
preparing the production budget include available production capacity; the sales forecast and finished
goods stock level policy, among others.
The cycle for the preparation of the production budget usually is determined by the budget committee. It
follows the following steps:
 Consider the possible ways in which the available production capacity may be expandedif
required.
 Linkage of production capacity available to the stock level
 Determine the detailed budgets within the production budget.
Illustration
ABC Ltd. which deals in products Cee and Dee wishes to prepare an operating budget for the forthcoming
period. The information regarding the products, cost and sales level is as follows:
Department
Cee Dee
Materials required
Aye (kg) 4 6
Bee (litres) 2 8
Labour hours required
Skilled (hours) 8 4
Semi-skilled (hours) 4 10
Sales level (units) 4,000 3,000
Opening stock (units) 200 400
The following additional information is relevant:

1. Material Aye costs Sh. 100 per kg and material Bee costs Sh.70 per litre.
2. Skilled and semi-skilled workers are paid Sh.120 and Sh.80 per hour respectively.
3. Opening stocks were 600kg for material Aye and 2,000 litres for material Bee.
4. Closing stock of both materials and finished goods will be enough to meet 10% of demand.
Required;
Compute the Production (units)

Solution
a)
i) Production Budgets
Products Cee Dee

Units Units
Budgeted closing stock 400 300
10% of sales = 10% x 400/300 4,000 3,000
Budgeted sales (200) (400)
Budgeted opening stock 4,200 2,900
Direct Materials budget: this shows the estimated quantities and costs of all the raw materials and
components needed for the output demand by the production budget. Sufficient raw materials must be
available to meet the production process and, in addition, provide ending raw materials working inventory
for the period under consideration. Direct raw materials budget is expressed in units. It consists of;-
i. Direct Materials Usage Budget

ii. Direct Materials Purchases Budget
Direct Materials Usage Budget: it shows the estimated quantities of materials required for budgeted
production.
Compute the material usage (kg and litres)
Solution
Material Usage (Kg and litres)

Materials Aye Bee
Kg Litres
Cee (4,200 x 4) 16,800 (4,200 x 2) 8,400
Dee (2,900 x 6) 17,400 (2,900 x 8) 23,200
34,200 31,600
Direct Materials Purchases Budget: It ensures that materials are within the planned materials stock
levels i.e. after considering both usage and material stocks required.
Format
Material
Budgeted closing stock (units) xxx

Add: Budgeted material usage (units) xxx
Less: Budgeted opening stock (units) (xx)
Budgeted materials purchases in units xxx a
Material prices xxx b
Budgeted materials produced in value xxx a x b

Illustration
Compute the Material purchases (kg. Litres and sh)
Solution
Materials purchase (Kg – Litres and Shs)
Aye Bee
Kg, shs Litres, shs
Budgeted closing Stock10% of demand 3,420 3,160
Budgeted material usage 34,200 31,600
Budgeted opening stock (600) 2,000
Budgeted material purchase (kg,litres) 37,020 32,760
Material price ×100 ×70
Material purchase (shs) 3,702,000 2,293,200
Direct Labour budget: this is crucial as it forecasts the number of labour hours required and thus helps
the company to know whether sufficient labour time is available to meet production needs in the budget
period. It is based on production budget estimate. This budget helps the company know whether it will
need additional labour force in the future and how much it will incur as labour costs.
Illustration
Compute the Labour (hours and shillings)
Solution
Labour cost budget (hours and Shs)
Skilled Semi-Skilled Total
Cee – 4,200 × 8 33,600 4,200 × 4 16,800 50,400
Dee – 2,900 × 4 11,600 2,900×10 29,000 40,600
Labour in (hours) 45,200 45,800 91,000
Labour cost × 120 × 80 -
Total labour cost(shs) 5,424,000 3,664,000 9,088,000
NON- PRODUCTION BUDGETS

Selling and Distribution Cost Budget: It is the forecast of all costs incurred in selling and distributing
the company’s product during the budget period. It is closely concerned with the sales budget in that it is
mainly based on the volume of sales projected for the period. Expenses included are selling office costs,
salesmen salaries and commission, advertising expenses,
etc.
Administration Costs Budget: It represents the costs of all administration expenses.

Each department or budget centre will be responsible for the preparation of its own budget.
Management, Secretarial, Accounting and Administration costs, which cannot be directly related to the
production, are included here. The budget will be mainly incremental i.e. previous year’s figure will tend
to apply for its next budget with an allowance for inflation.

Research and Development Cost Budget: These are costs, which are discretional in nature i.e. they are
determined on need basis by the managers concerned. Research cost is the cost of original investigation
undertaken in order to gain new scientific or technical knowledge and directed towards a specific
practical aim objective.
Development cost is the cost of using scientific or technical knowledge in order to produce new or
substantially improved materials, devices, products, processes systems or services prior to the
commencement of commercial production.
Capital Expenditure Budget: It represents the expenditure on all fixed assets during the budget period.
Addition intended to benefit future accounting periods, or expenditure which increases the production
capacity, efficiency lifespan or economy of existing fixed assets are also incorporated.
CASH BUDGET
It shows the expected receipts and payment of money for a given period.
A cash budget is useful because
i) Shows the expected surplus in the short run and long run so that the amounts can be invested in a
profitable venture
ii) Shows the expected deficit in the short run and long run so that the necessary arrangement can be
made to finance the deficit
Functions or cash budget

i) It ensures that cash is available for revenue expenditure
ii) Helps to indicate where, when and how cash will be needed and whether this permanent or
temporarily.
iii) Helps to preserve liquidity throughout the year
iv) It relieves surplus cash for investment of expansion of facilities
v) It guides management on financial capital expenditure both internally and externally
CASH BUDGET FORMART

Jan Feb. March
Balance b/d xxx xxx xxx
Sales receipts xxx xxx xxx
Process from sale of assets - - xxx
Dividend income - xxx -
Rent receivable xxx xxx xxx
Total (a) xxx xxx xxx
Less payments
Payments to supplies xxx xxx xxx
Rent paid xxx xxx xxx
Interest paid - xxx -
Asset paid for xxx - -
Salaries and wages xxx xxx xxx
Total payment B xxx xxx xxx
Balance c/d (a – b) xxx xxx xxx

Preparing the cash budget
A cash budget is a detailed budget of estimated cash inflows and outflows incorporating both revenue and
capital items.
The preparation of cash budgets or budgeted cash flow statements has two main objectives:
To provide periodic budgeted cash balances for the budgeted balance sheet.
To anticipate cash shortages / surpluses and thus provide information to assist management in short and
medium-term cash planning and longer-term financing for the organisations.
Method of preparation
 Forecast sales
 Forecast time-lag on converting debtors to cash, and hence forecast cash receipts from credit sales.
 Determine stock levels, and hence purchase requirements
 Forecast time-lag on paying suppliers, and thus cash payments for purchases.
 Incorporate other cash payments and receipts, including such items as capital expenditure and tax
payments.
 Collate all this cash flow information, so as to determine the net cash flows.
Layout of the cash budget

A tabular layout should be used, with:
 Columns for weeks, months or quarters (as appropriate)
 Rows for cash inflows and outflows.
Illustration
The opening cash balance on 1 January was expected to be sh.30,000. The sales budgeted were as
follows:
sh.
November 80,000
December 90,000
January 75,000
February 75,000
March 80,000
Analysis of records shows that debtors settle according to the following pattern.
60% within the month of sale
25% the month following
15% the month following
Extracts from the purchases budget were as follows:

sh.
December 60,000
January 55,000
February 45,000
March 55,000
All purchase are on credit and past experience shows that 90% are settled in the month of purchase and
the balance settled the month after.

Wages are sh.8, 000 has to be settled in February and the company will receive settlement of an insurance
claim of sh.25,000 in March.
Required;
Prepare a cash budget for January, February and March.
Solution
Workings Receipts from sales
January
cash
Sh.
November (15% x 80,000) 12,000
December (25% x 90,000) 22,500
January (60% x 75,000) 45,000
79,500
February
cash
sh.
November (15% x 90,000) 13,500
December (25% x 75,000) 18,750
January (60% x 8,000) 45,000
77,250
March cash
sh.
November (15% x 75,900) 11,250
December (25% x 75,000) 18,750
January (60% x 8,000) 48,000
78,000
Payments for purchases
January
cash
sh.
December (10% x 60,000) 6,000
January (60% x 50,000) 49,500
55,500
February
cash
sh.
January (10% x 50,000) 5,500
February (90% x 45,000) 40,500
46,000

March
cash
sh.
February (10% x 45,000) 4,500
March (90% x 55,000) 49,500
54,000
Cash budget
January February March
sh. sh. sh.
Opening balance 30,000 24,000 17,250
Receipts from sales 79,500 77,250 78,000
Insurance claim _____ _____ 25,000
= Total cash available 109,500 101,250 120,250
Payments
Purchases 55,000 46,000 54,000
Wages 15,000 15,000 15,000
Overheads (less depreciation) 15,000 15,000 15,000
Taxation _____ 8,000 ______
Total payments 85,500 84,000 84,000
Closing balance c/f 24,000 17,250 36,250
Note: The above example has been kept simple to show clearly the underlying principles which must be
understood. Typical complications which often appear include the following: purchases, wages, etc., may
not be given directly but have to be derived from stock/sales figures and where there are bad debts the
receipts from sales are not equal to 100% of sales and so on.
PROFORMA FINANCIAL REPORTS
(INCOME STATEMENTS AND BALANCE SHEETS)

In business, pro formafinancial statements are prepared in advance of a planned transaction, such as a
merger, an acquisition, a new capital investment, or a change in capital structure such as incurrence of
new debt or issuance of stock. The pro forma models are the anticipated results of the transaction with
particular emphasis on the projected cash flows, net revenues and taxes. Consequently, pro forma
statements summarize the projected future status of a company, based on the current financial statements.
For example, when a transaction with a material effect on a company's financial condition is
contemplated, the finance department will prepare, for management and board review, a business plan
containing pro formafinancial statements demonstrating the expected effect of the proposed transaction on
the company's financial viability. Lenders and investors will require such statements to structure or
confirm compliance with debt covenants such as debt service reserve coverage and debt to equity ratios.

Similarly, when a new corporation is envisioned, its founders will prepare pro formafinancial statements
for the information of prospective investors.
Pro forma figures should be clearly labeled as such and the reason for any deviation from reported past
figures clearly explained.
Also, banks will request pro forma statements in lieu of tax returns for a startup business in order to verify
cash flow before issuing a loan or line of credit.
Pro Forma Income Statements

A pro forma income statement is similar to a historical income statement, except it projects the future
rather than tracks the past. Pro forma income statements are an important tool for planning future business
operations. If the projections predict a downturn in profitability, you can make operational changes such
as increasing prices or decreasing costs before these projections become reality.
Pro forma income statements provide an important benchmark or budget for operating a business
throughout the year. They can determine whether expenses can be expected to run higher in the first
quarter of the year than in the second. They can determine whether or not sales can be expected to be run
above average in June. The can determine whether or not your marketing campaigns need an extra boost
during the fall months. All in all, they provide you with invaluable information—the sort of information
you need in order to make the right choices for your business.
How do I create a pro forma income statement?
Sit down with an income statement from the current year. Consider how each item on that statement can
or will be changed during the coming year. This should, ideally, be done before year’s end. You will need
to estimate final sales and expenses for the current year to prepare a pro forma income statement for the
coming year.
Pro forma gross profit

Assumingthat the expected sales are to increase by 10 percent next year. Multiply this year’s sales of sh.1,
000,000 by 110 percent to get sh.1, 100,000. Then, in this case, you assume there will be no increase in
the cost of each item you are selling, but you will need 10 percent more items to sell in order to achieve
your sales goals. So, you multiply this year’s cost of goods sold (let’s assume a figure of sh.500, 000), by
110 percent to get sh.550, 000.
To figure the pro forma gross profit for next year, subtract the pro forma cost of goods sold from the pro
forma sales. Sh.1, 100,000 minus sh.550, 000equalto gross profit, or sh.550, 000.
Pro forma total expenses

assuming salaries and other expenses will increase by 5 percent. Therefore, multiply historical salaries of
sh.200, 000 and historical expenses of sh.100, 000 by 105 percent each. The pro forma salaries for next
year will be sh.210, 000 and your pro forma expenses will be sh.105, 000.
Figurethe pro forma total expenses by adding pro forma salaries and pro forma other expenses together.
In our case the pro forma total expenses will be sh.315, 000.
Pro forma profit before taxes

Pro forma profit before taxes is figured by subtracting the pro forma expenses from the pro forma gross
profit, or sh.315, 000 from sh.550, 000 for a pro forma profit before taxes of sh.235, 000.

Pro forma taxes
Pro forma taxes are figured by taking estimated tax rate, in this case 30 percent, and multiplying it by the
pro forma profit before taxes of sh.235, 000. This produces a pro forma tax of sh.70, 500.
Pro forma profit after taxes

Pro forma profit after taxes is figured by subtracting the pro forma tax of sh.70, 500 from the pro forma
profit before taxes of sh.235, 000. The pro forma profit after taxes, in this case, would be projected at
sh.164, 300.
Remember that pro formas are essentially best guesses. Continually update of the projections by
recalculating your pro formas using any new and actual financial information as a base should be done.
Doing this on a monthly or quarterly basis will help to assure that projections are as close to being
accurate as possible.
Pro-forma balance sheets

A pro forma balance sheet is similar to a historical balance sheet, but it represents a future projection. Pro
forma balance sheets are used to project how the business will be managing its assets in the future. For
example, a pro forma balance sheet can quickly show the projected relative amount of money tied up in
receivables, inventory, and equipment. It can also be used to project the overall financial soundness of the
company. For example, a pro forma balance sheet can help quickly pinpoint a high debt-to-equity ratio.
Pro forma current assets

 Cash
To obtain a company’s estimated cash position, there is need to do a careful cash flow projection.
 Pro forma accounts receivable
To estimate the accounts receivable on December 31, one needs to take into consideration the average
collection time of receivables and the sales projections for prior periods.
 Pro forma total current assets
Pro forma total current assets are determined by adding projected cash and projected accounts
receivable.
Pro forma fixed assets

 Pro forma land
Land is the easiest of pro forma asset values to calculate. Because land does not depreciate, it will
always have the same value.
 Pro forma buildings
Buildings do depreciate. Let’s assume we are depreciating the building over thirty years. A company
bought its building for sh.300, 000. Each year the building will depreciate by sh.10, 000. By
December 31, 1999, the building will be three years old, so the total depreciation will be sh.30, 000.
This will be reflected later in the accumulated depreciation total. Under the building heading we show
the original value of the asset or sh.300, 000.
 Pro forma vehicles
Vehicles also depreciate. They depreciate over a much shorter period of time than do buildings. Let’s
assume we are depreciating a company’s truck over a seven-year period. The truck was purchased for

sh.73, 500 on January 1, 1999. So, each year the truck will depreciate by sh.10, 500. On December
31, 1999, after one year of depreciation, the truck will have an accumulated depreciation of sh.10,
500.
 Pro forma total assets
Pro forma total assets are determined by adding up the pro forma total current assets and pro forma
total fixed assets.
Pro forma current liabilities

 Pro forma accounts payable
Pro forma accounts payable are determined by figuring out how much one will spend on supplies
during the last months of the year and how long it takes you to pay your bills.
 Pro forma accrued payroll
It should be easy to determine a pro forma accrued payroll. This is by checkingthe payroll calendar to
find out what employee pay periods will remain unpaid by the beginning of the pro forma balance
sheet period.
 Pro forma total current liabilities
To obtain pro forma total current liabilities, add up pro forma accounts payable, accrued payroll, and
notes, or portions thereof, payable, within one year.
Pro forma long-term liabilities

 Pro forma mortgage payable
The size of a pro forma mortgage note payable is calculated by taking the mortgage payable at the
end of the current year and subtracting the principal, not interest, payments that will be made during
the upcoming year. To obtain that portion of the mortgage that will be classified as a long-term
liability, subtract what is classified as current liability.
 Pro forma total liabilities
Pro forma total liabilities are determined by adding up current and long-term liabilities.
Pro forma owners’ equity

 Pro forma common stock
The common stock portion of the owners’ equity will not change from year to year unless new stock
is issued.
 Pro forma retained earnings
Pro forma retained earnings can be tricky to determine. They are the last item to be calculated on a
pro forma balance sheet.
Total assets must balance the total liabilities and owners’ equity.
Also, total liabilities added to total owners’ equity must equal total liabilities and owners’ equity. So, you
can determine total owners’ equity by subtracting total liabilities from total liabilities and owners’ equity.
Common stock added to retained earnings must equal total owners’ equity. So, by subtracting common
stock from total owners’ equity, retained earnings can be determined. This completes a pro forma balance
sheet.

OBJECTIVES OF BUDGETARY CONTROL SYSTEM
1. To plan various activities of the organization

A budget is a formal expression of the future plan. It helps in determining the individual goal of each
activity or department and planning their action in achieving the goal. Budgets provide premises for
detailed operational plans to be followed during the budget period
2. To coordinate the activities of the organization
Every department may prepare their individual plan believing that they are doing the best for the
organization, but this may result in a conflict with the objectives of other departments. The budgetary
control system helps t3o resolve conflicts between departments and therefore helps the organization
to progress as a whole
A master budget is a consolidation of all the other functional budgets. While preparing a master
budget, all the budgets target are reviewed and any conflict between them is resolved. This system
converts the budget into a common plan
3. To devaluate performance of the executives
The budget sets targets for implementation. Such targets are compared with actual performance at
regular intervals. The performance of the executives is also evaluated.
4. To identify areas the areas of efficiency and inefficiency
The budget provides a yardstick for measuring performance and identifying deviations. Such
deviations are then analyzed to determine the efficiency of the personnel as well as the machines.
Once any in efficiencies have been identified, corrective action n is taken to overcome these
inefficiencies.
After budget has been prepared, feedback on performances is given at a regular interval and any
variances are investigated. This helps in achieving the organizational objectives.
5. To provide basis for the control system
Budgeting is a management tool. Its emphasis is on managing costs and revenues. By doing so, it
ultimately manages the activities. It provides a guideline of what allowable limit of cost should be.
Again budget provides a good measure of performance. Accordingly top management can resort to
select control to concentrate more on areas of weakness. This approach is called management by
exception.
It also aids lower level management to evaluate their own performance by comparing .it with the
budgeted.
6. To motivate managers
Budgets provide challenges as well as incentives for better performance. A budget is used as a tool to
measure the performance of managers; it motivates managers to work effectively and efficiently to
meet the target. Sometimes, monetary rewards and promotions are given if the targets are achieved.
This motivates managers to improve their performance. I f achieving higher productivity is linked
managers will be encouraged to achieve it.
7. To Increase profitability
While reviewing the budgets before they finalized. If overestimation of expenditure is identified,
senior managers will curtail the excess provision for expenditure. Also, by comparing the budgeted
expenditure with the actual expenditure, managers can pin point any extravagant expenses and can
avoid them in future by avoiding these extravagant, profitability can be increased.

8. To ensure best use of available resources
Men, material, machinery and money are referred to as the four M’Ss and are the factors of
production. These factors are vital for production and thus should be optimally utilized. At the time of
devising budgets, management identifies current and future limiting factors and manages them in
such a way that they will become hindrances in the future
9. To provide a means of communication
Budget targets are the expectations. If the individual functional managers prepare the budget, they
communicate the functional objectives through the budget. In the same way, top level management
sets the target to be achieved during the budget year. Therefore, the budget acts as a medium of
communication (horizontally as well as well as vertically) between all the levels of management
within the organization
OPERATION OF A BUDGETARY CONTROL SYSTEM, ORGANIZATION AND

COORDINATION OF THE BUDGETING FUNCTION
The co-ordination and administration of budgets is usually the responsibility of a budget committee
(with the managing director as chairman). The budget committee is assisted by a budget officer who is
usually an accountant. Every part of the organisation should be represented on the committee, so there
should be a representative from sales, production, marketing and so on. Functions of the budget
committee include the following
a) Co-ordination of the preparation of budgets, which includes the issue of the budget manual
b) Issuing of timetables for the preparation of functional budgets
c) Allocation of responsibilities for the preparation of functional budgets
d) Provision of information to assist in the preparation of budgets
e) Communication of final budgets to the appropriate managers
f) Comparison of actual results with budget and the investigation of variances
g) Continuous assessment of the budgeting and planning process, in order to improve the planning and
control function
The budget preparation process is as follows.

The procedures involved in preparing a budget will differ from organisation to organisation, but the step-
by-step approach described here is indicative of the steps followed by many organisations. The
preparation of a budget may take weeks or months and the budget committee may meet several times
before an organisation's budget is finally agreed.
Step 1
Communicating details of the budget policy and budget guidelines
The long-term plan is the starting point for the preparation of the annual budget.
Managers responsible for preparing the budget must be aware of the way it is affected by the long-term
plan so that it becomes part of the process of meeting the organisation's objectives. For example, if the
long-term plan calls for a more aggressive pricing policy, the budget must take this into account.
Managers should also be provided with important guidelines for wage rate increases, changes in
productivity and so on, as well as information about industry demand and output.

Step 2
Determining the factor that restricts output
The principal budget factor (or key budget factor or limiting budget factor is the factor that limits an
organisation's performance for a given period and is often the starting point in budget preparation.
For example, a company's sales department might estimate that it could sell 1,000 units of product X,
which would require 5,000 hours of grade A labour to produce.
If there are no units of product X already in inventory, and only 4,000 hours of grade A labour available
in the budget period, then the company would be unable to sell 1,000 units of X because of the shortage
of labour hours. Grade A labour would be a limiting budget factor, and the company's management must
choose one of the following options.
a) Reduce budgeted sales by 20%.
b) Try to increase the availability of grade A labour by 1,000 hours (25:1) by recruitment or
overtime working.
c) Try to sub-contract the production of 1,000 units to another manufacturer, but still profit on the
transaction.
In most organisations the principal budget factor is sales demand: a company is usually restricted from
making and selling more of its products because there would be no sales demand for the increased output
at a price which would be acceptable/profitable to the company. The principal budget factor may also be
machine capacity, distribution and selling resources, the availability of key raw materials or the
availability of cash. Once this factor is defined then the rest of the budget can be prepared. For example, if
sales are the principal budget factor then the production manager can only prepare his budget after the
sales budget is complete.
However in the public sector, the principal budget factor will not be profit related. You need to think
about the limiting factor for these organisations in terms of activity, for insurance consultant availability,
cash budget or accommodation.
Remember that state-run organisations providing services free at the point of consumption often face
almost unlimited demand for their services. Therefore resources available usually comprise the limiting
factor: -
a) Cash from government grants and ministries
b) Trained staff such as nurses and doctors
c) Equipment such as MRI scanners and hospital beds
Step 3
Preparation of the sales budget
For many organisations, the principal budget factor is sales volume. The sales budget is therefore often
the primary budget from which the majority of the other budgets are derived.
Before the sales budget can be prepared a sales forecast has to be made.
Sales forecasting is complex and involves the consideration of a number of factors.
a) Past sales patterns
b) The economic environment
c) Results of market research
d) Anticipated advertising

e) Competition
f) Changing consumer taste
g) New legislation
h) Distribution
i) Pricing policies and discounts offered
j) Legislation
k) Environmental factors
Management can use a number of forecasting methods.

a) Sales personnel can be asked to provide estimates.
b) Market research can be used (especially if an organisation is considering introducing a new product or
service).
c) Various mathematical techniques can be used to estimate sales levels.
d) Annual contracts, under which major customers set out in advance monthly ranges of possible sales,
can be reviewed.
On the basis of the sales forecast and the production capacity of the organisation, a sales budget will be
prepared. This may be subdivided, possible subdivisions being by product, by sales area or by
management responsibility.
Step 4
Initial preparation of budgets
Finished goods inventory budget
Decides the planned increase or decrease in finished inventory levels.
Production budget
Stated in units of each product and is calculated as the sales budget in units plus the budgeted increase in
finished goods inventories or minus the budgeted decrease in finished goods inventories.
Budgets of resources for production
Materials usage budget is stated in quantities and perhaps cost for each type of material used. It should
take into account budgeted losses in production.
Machine utilization budget shows the operating hours required on each machine or group of machines. .
Labour budgetor wages budget will be expressed in hours for each grade of labour and in terms of cost.
It should take into account budgeted idle time.
Overhead cost budgets
Production overheads
Administration overheads
Selling and distribution overheads
Research and developmentdepartment overheads
Raw materials inventory budget
Decides the planned increase or decrease of the level of inventories.
Raw materials purchase budget
Can be prepared in quantities and value for each type of material purchased once the raw material usage
requirements and the raw materials inventory budget are known.
Overhead absorption rate
Can be calculated once the production volumes are planned, and the overhead cost centre budgets

prepared.
Step 5
Negotiation of budgets with superiors
Once a manager has prepared his draft budget he should submit it to his superior for approval. The
superior should then incorporate this budget with the others for which he or she is responsible and then
submit this budget for approval to his or her superior.
This process continues until the final budget is presented to the budget committee for
approval.
At each stage of the process, the budget would be negotiated between the manager who
had prepared the budget and his/her superior until agreed by both parties.
Step 6
Co-ordination of budgets
It is unlikely that the above steps will be problem-free. The budgets must be reviewed in relation to one
another. Such a review may indicate that some budgets are out of balance with others and need
modifying. The budget officer' must identify such inconsistencies and bring them to the attention of the
manager concerned. The revision of one budget may lead to the revision of all budgets. During this
process the budgeted income statement and budgeted statement of financial position and cash budget
should be prepared to ensure that all of the individual parts of the budget combine into an
acceptable master budget.
Step 7
Final acceptance of the budget
When all the budgets are in harmony with one another they are summarized into a master budget
consisting of a budgeted income statement, budgeted statement of financial position and cash budget.
Step 8
Budget review
The budgeting process does not stop once the budgets have been agreed. Actual results should be
compared on a regular basis with the budgeted results. The frequency with which such comparisons are
made depends very much on the organisation's circumstances and the sophistication of its control systems
but it should occur at least monthly. Management should receive a report detailing the differences and
should investigate the reasons for the differences. If the differences are within the control of
management, corrective action should be taken to bring the reasons for the difference under control and to
ensure that such inefficiencies do not occur in the future.
The differences may have occurred, however, because the budget was unrealistic to begin with or because
the actual conditions did not reflect those anticipated (or could have possibly been anticipated). This
would therefore invalidate the remainder of tile budget.
The budget committee, who should meet periodically to evaluate the organisation's actual performance,
may need to reappraise the organisation's future plans in the light of changes to anticipate conditions and
to adjust the budget to take account of such changes.
The important point to note is that the budgeting process does not end for the current year once the budget
period has begun: budgeting should be seen as a continuous and dynamic process.

BENEFITS OF BUDGETING
a) It is the major formal way in which the organisational objectives are translated into specific plans,
tasks and objectives related to individual management and supervisors. It should provide clear
guidelines for current operations
b) It is an important medium of communication for organisational plan, objectives and of the progress
towards meeting those objectives.
c) The development of budgets (done properly) helps to achieve co-ordination between the various
departments and functions of the organisation.
d) The involvement of all levels of management with setting budgets, the acceptance of defined targets,
the two way flow of information and other facets of a properly organised budgeting system all help to
promote coalition of interest and to increase motivation.
PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH BUDGETING

Various problems and difficulties which may occur in connection with budgeting given below but itdoes
not necessarily follow that they will occur in any given organisation
a) There may be too much reliance on the technique as a substitute for good management
b) The budgetary system, perhaps because of undue pressure or poor human relations, may cause
antagonism and decrease motivation.
c) Variances are just as frequently due to changing circumstances, poor forecasting or general
uncertainties as due to managerial performance.
d) Budgets are developed round existing organisational structures and departments which may be
inappropriate for current conditions and may not reflect the underlying economic realities.
e) The very existence of well documented plans and budgets may cause inertia
and lack of flexibility in adapting to change.
f) There is a major problem in setting the levels of attainment to be included in budgets and standards.
DISTINCTION BETWEEN BUDGETING AND BUDGETARY CONTROL IN THE

PRIVATE AND PUBLIC SECTORS
Public Sector Budgeting Theory and Strategy
Main Types of Budget

Budgets can cover a variety of activities and purposes. Each budget type will be produced for a specific
reason and there will be differences in content and approach:
 budgets can be produced for either capital or revenue; resource budgets (e.g. for labour) can also
be produced. This would be seen as a way of planning or controlling labour inputs;
 budgets can be produced for sales, income and revenues;
 working capital budgets, e.g. for stock or cash. It is essential that cash flow is effectively
managed and the optimum benefit obtained from cash resources. Budgets for stock, debtors and
creditors can be seen as a way of controlling the use of current assets and liabilities;
 aggregate or consolidated budgets can be prepared for the organisation as a whole;

 budgets can be subjective based (i.e. what expenditure is on, e.g. wages, premises or supplies) or
objective based (i.e. what the budget is being spent on, e.g. the cost charged to a particular service
or activity). The latter is usually preferred as it enables decision makers make rational choices but
the former is simpler from the control perspective. These budgets can be produced at multiple
levels throughout the organisation for example, at a service level, for a group of services or a
single unit.
Environment and Objectives

Public and private sector organisations operate in different environments and some of the approaches
taken to budget setting will differ. Some of the essential differences between the two sectors are
summarised in the table below.
Private and public sector objectives - a comparison
Private sector Public sector
Market driven Resource constrained (i.e. funded by taxation)
Resources influenced by market demand Resources controlled by government through grant
settlements
Reliance upon external sales Activity generally determined politically
Need for flexibility Fixed budgets
Profit oriented Service/community oriented
Single or limited number of objective(s) Multi (and often conflicting) objectives
Outputs identifiable and measurable Outputs subjective and qualitative
Decisions made by: Decisions made by:
 Shareholders  Electorate
 Customers  Service Users
 Workforce  Employees
 Management  Management
 Board  Politicians
The boundaries between the two sectors have however become less apparent in recent years due to the
effects of externalisation, competitive tendering, the development of both internal and external trading
activities and an increasing emphasis on partnerships amongst both statutory agencies and the private
sector.
Nevertheless these key differences will influence the approach which public sector bodies take to
budgeting particularly in relation to the need for processes and procedures to be adapted to reflect the
external environment in which they operate and translate this into the setting of budget requirements.

Satisfying external and internal environments
In common with private sector organisations those operating in the public sector must also adapt their
budgeting processes to reflect their internal and external environments.
Public sector budget preparation will be influenced by a number of internal factors including:
 the proposed income and expenditure of the organisations services;
 the revenue consequences of any proposed capital expenditure;
 the use of balances and reserves;
 contributions from trading activities and any surpluses or deficits from the collection fund (local
authorities only);
 growth and savings.
Public sector bodies do not operate in a vacuum and their actions have a significant effect on the national
economy as they are funded by some form of taxation. They also have an effect on the Public Sector
Borrowing Requirement (PSBR) by borrowing money to fund expenditure.
By aggregating budgets throughout the public sector central government can then monitor its activities
against its plans or targets (as set through Comprehensive Spending Reviews and Public Service
Agreements) and take appropriate action to ensure that these are met.
The revenue expenditure of public bodies is funded at national level by either taxation or fees/charges and
at local government level by government grants, local taxation and fees/charges. Statutory frameworks
also exist to ensure that public sector organisations set balanced budgets. Balanced budgets are ones
where the organisation’s estimated revenue expenditure can be met from all sources together with
contributions from reserves.
Objectives of public sector budgeting

Budgeting in the public sector context shares many similarities with the private sector but contains a
greater focus on the relationship with policy development, performance monitoring and statutory
objectives. The key objectives of public sector budgeting are:
 assisting in planning expenditure to meet policy requirements;
 policy implementation and control;
 measuring and monitoring performance;
 to determine the total expenditure of the organisation and ensure that it is consistent with total
revenues (e.g. fixing the rate of local taxation);
 provide the basis for authorising expenditure and collection of fees and charges;
 provide the basis for budgetary control;
 satisfaction of statutory requirements.
Current developments in the public sector and their impact on budgeting theory
Over recent years the public sector has faced many challenges due to the rapid pace of change both in the
way services are delivered and in organisational structures and relationships. These changes have meant
that the finance and budgetary function has had to adapt itself to accommodate radically different ways of
working and delivering services and to play a key role in developing and maintaining an effective. As
new policy developments are introduced the need for effective governance and budgetary control
arrangements to ensure probity and sound financial management remain undiminished.

Overview of the Relationship between Budgeting and Strategy Formulation, Long Term Planning
and Control
The budget is a financial and quantitative statement of an organisation’s activities which is prepared prior
to a definitive period of time. It provides managers and policy makers with financial information to assist
them in taking strategic decisions for which they are responsible.
In any large organisation, and particularly in the public sector, there will be conflicting policy objectives
all of which will have different resource implications which may have either capital or revenue
consequences.
An effective budgeting process should allow all of the financial implications of alternative policy
objectives to be assessed thereby enabling policy makers to appraise them and compare the costs against
available resources.
As External Environment to Budgeting has illustrated, public authorities are not only restricted by
resource implications but also by the external environment and political context in which they operate.
The budget allows policy makers to assess their alternative plans and identify their priorities within their
affordable limits.
Budgets are a key element of effective strategy planning. Medium and Long Term Financial Planning
covers the differences between, and objectives of, long term or strategic planning, medium term and short
term financial planning.
The budget is a financial/resource representation of corporate objectives and also a plan of action for the
period covered. Once the budget is adopted by a public authority it's delivery is placed within the remit of
the accountable management who will have approval to incur expenditure in line with stated financial
regulations and a scheme of delegation.
The budget forms the basis of a controlling mechanism for the various resources of a public authority.
Budgetary control can be applied at all managerial levels provided that managers are made accountable
for the budgets for which they are responsible. The budget can also highlight variations from expectations
so that senior management can take remedial action to ensure that expenditure is contained within the
budget and remains consistent with corporate objectives and policies.

REVISION EXERCISE
QUESTION ONE
The following information has been assembled by Sancross Products Ltd which manufactures and retails
products A and B. The details given below relate to the year commencing 1 July 200:
Standard Product
Price per kg A kg g
Direct material – M1 Sh 4 15 20
M2 Sh 5 14 12
Standard Product
Rate per hour A hours B hours
Direct labour – L1 Sh 8 20 15
L2 Sh 10 22 24
Fixed production overhead is applied on direct labour basis. Administration, selling and distribution
expenses are recovered at the rate of 20% of production cost and profit loaded at 25% of standard
production cost.
Product
A B
Sh ‘000’ Sh ‘000’
Projected sales for the year 12,033 10,053
Finished goods stock position valued at production cost is expected to be as follows:

Product
A B
Sh ‘000’ Sh ‘000’
1 July 2000 3,000 2,000
30 June 2001 5,000 4,000
Direct material stocks valued at standard prices are as follows:
Material
M1 M2
Sh ‘000’ Sh ‘000’
1 July 2000 200 250
30 June 2001 220 270

For the year to 30 June 2001, fixed production overhead has been estimated at
Sh 1,800,000 and direct labour at 1,200,000 hours.
No opening or closing work-in-progress is anticipated.
Required:
a) Production budget in units.
b) Direct materials cost budget.
c) Purchases budget in value.
d) Direct labour cost budget.
Solution:
Sancross Products Ltd

Cost Per Unit of Product A B
Direct Material – M1 60 80
-M2 70 60
Total Material Cost 130 140
Direct Labour:- L1 160 120
L2 220 240
Total Labour Cost 380 360
PRIME COST 510 500
Fixed Production Overheads 380 360
Production Cost 890 360
Administration, selling and Distribution
costs @ 20% 178 172
Total Standard Cost of Product 1,068 1,032
Profit @ 25% of Product cost 267 258
Selling Price 1,335 1,290
a)Production Budget (Workings)

A B
Projected Sales 12,033,000 10,053,000
Selling Price/Unit 1,335 1,290
Sales Units Projected 9,013 7,793
Opening Stock (Shs) Shs 3,000,000 Shs 2,000,000
Opening Stock (Units) 3,000,000/890 2,000,000/860
= 3,371 Units = 2,326 Units
Closing Stock (Shs) Shs 5,000,000 Shs 4,000,000
Units 5,000,000/890 Shs 4,000,000/860
= 5,618 Units = 4,651 Units
Sancross Products Limited

Production Budget (Units) for the year commencing 1 July 2000
A B
Sales 9,013 7,793
Closing Stock 5,618 4,651
Less Opening Stock 14,631 12,444
Production (3,371) (2,326)
11,260 10,118
b) Direct Materials Cost Budget

M1 M2
Shs Shs
Product A: 11,260 × 15 × 4 675,600 11,260 × 14 ×5 788,200
B: 10,118 × 20 × 4 809,440 10,118 ×12 ×5 607,080
1,463,800 1,416,520
c)Purchases Cost Budget for Raw Materials

M1 M2
Shs Shs
Direct materials Usage 1,463,800 1,416,520
Add: Closing stock 220,000 270,000
1,683,800 1,686,520
Less Opening stock (200,000) (250,000)
1,483,000 1,436,520
d) Direct Labour Cost Budget
L1 L2
Shs Shs
Product A 20 ×8 ×11,260 1,801,600 22 × 10×11,260 2,447,200
Product B 15 × 8 ×10,118 1,214,160 24 × 10 ×10,118 2,428,320
3,015,760 4,905,520
QUESTION TWO
You are in charge of making forecasts and preparing budgets. You have been supplied with cost and
revenue forecasts and details of payment as follows:
1. Forecast of revenue and costs for the quarter ending 31 March 2001
January February March
Shs. Shs. Shs.
Direct
Materials (purchases) 112,000 100,000 135,000
Wages 90,000 80,000 100,000
Overhead

Production 34,000 32,000 40,000
Administration 22,000 20,000 27,000
Selling and distribution 13,000 11,000 18,000
Sales 360,000 350,000 440,000
2. Forecast of revenue and costs for the quarter ending 30 June 2001
April May June
Sh. Sh. Sh.
Direct
Materials (purchases) 90,000 67,000 79,000
Wages 72,000 54,000 63,000
Overhead
Production 45,000 36,000 40,000
Administration 22,000 25,000 27,000
Sales 350,000 360,000 360,000
Cash balance on 1 April 2001 Sh. 90,000
Other details
 Period of credit allowed by suppliers averages two months.
 Debenture to the value of Shs. 125,000 are being issued in May 2001 and the amount is
expected to be received during the month.
 A new machine is being installed at the end of March 2001 at a cost of Sh 150,000 and payment
is promised in early May 2001.
 Sales commission of 3% is payable within one month of sales.
 A dividend of Sh 100000 is to be paid in June 2001.
 There is a delay of one month in the payment of overheads. There is also a delay in payment of
wages averaging a quarter of a month.
 Twenty per cent of the debtors pay cash, receiving a cash discount of 4% and 70% of debtors
pay within one month and receive a cash discount of 2 ½%. The other debtors pay within two
months.
Required:
A cash budget on a monthly basis from the second quarter of the year 2001.
Solution:
Cash Budget for the 2nd Quarter of Year 2001

Cash Inflows April May June
Sh. Sh. Sh.
Cash from debtors (wk 1) 402,500 351,995 349,820

Debentures issued - 125,000 -
Total cash inflow (A) 402,500 476,995 349,820
Cash Outflows
Purchases 100,000 135,000 90,000
Purchase of machine - 150,000 -
Dividends - - 100,000
Production overheads 40,000 45,000 36,000
Administration overheads 27,000 22,000 25,000
overheads
Wages (wk 2) 79,000 58,500 60,750
Sales commission 13,200 10,500 10,800
Total cash out flows (B) 277,200 434,000 333,500
Net cash flow (A – B) 125,300 42,995 16,270
Add: opening cash balance 90,000 215,300 258,295
Closing cash balance 215,300 258,295 274,565
Workings:
Debtors’ collection
April May June
Sales in: Sh. Sh. Sh.
February 350,000 35,000 - -
March 440,000 300,300 44,000 -
April 350,000 67,200 238,875 35,000
May 360,000 - 69,120 245,700
June 360,000 - - 69,120
402,500 351,995 349,820
Wages Payment
April May June
Month: Wages Shs Shs Shs
March 100,000 25,000 - -
April 72,000 54,000 18,000 -
May 54,000 - 40,500 13,500
June 63,000 - - 47,250
79,000 58,500 60,750

TOPIC 9
STANDARD COSTING
DEFINITION
A standard, as the term is usually used in management accounting, is a budgeted amount for a
single unit of output. A standard cost for one unit of output is the budgeted production cost for
that unit. Standard costs are calculated using engineering estimates of standard quantities of
inputs, and budgeted prices of those inputs. For example, for an apparel manufacturer, standard
quantities of inputs are required yards of fabric per jean and required hours of sewing operator
labour per jean. Budgeted prices for those inputs are the budgeted cost per yard of fabric and the
budgeted labour wage rate.
Standard quantities of inputs can be established based on ideal performance, or on expected

performance, but are usually based on efficient and attainable performance. Research in
psychology has determined that most people will exert the greatest effort when goals are
somewhat difficult to attain, but not extremely difficult. If goals are easily attained, managers
and employees might not work as hard as they would if goals are challenging. But also, if goals
appear out of reach, managers and employees might resign themselves to falling short of the
goal, and might not work as hard as they otherwise would. For this reason, standards are often
established based on efficient and attainable performance.
Hence, a standard is a type of budgeted number; one characterized by a certain amount of rigor
in its determination, and by its ability to motivate managers and employees to work towards the
company’s objectives for production efficiency and cost control.
There is an important distinction between standard costs and a standard costing system. Standard
costs are a component in a standard costing system. However, even companies that do not use
standard costing systems can utilize standards for budgeting, planning, and variance analysis.
Uses of Standard Costing:
 Standard costing is for improving cost /cost control, simplify stock valuation and
improving costing and pricing of products.
 Can be applied to jobs, operations, processes and department and are used in
manufacturing, engineering, processing and service industries.

Importance/ Advantages of standard costing
Standard costing systems provide cost information for various uses. These include:
(i) Setting of budgets

Standard costing systems assist in setting budgets and evaluating performance of the managers.
Standard costs are of particular importance for budgeting as they provide reliable and convenient
source of data to be used in the budgeting process. This, thus, reduces the budgetary time
because for instance, once the desired output units is known, then the budgeted cost is simply
derived by multiplying the budgeted cost per unit and the desired output in units.
(ii) Act as control devices and simplifies performance evaluation

Standard costing systems act as control devices by highlighting those costs or items that do not
conform to the budget or plan and thus alerts managers to those situations that need corrective
action. It acts as a yardstick against which costs and other items are measured to determine
whether the variance is favorable or unfavorable.
Once the budgets are prepared and agreed upon, the employees’ performance can be acceptably
measured against the set standards to determine whether the performance is acceptable or not.
Appropriate corrective measures can then be taken by the management.
(iii) Profit measurement and inventory valuation

Standard costing makes inventory valuation much easier as it simplifies the task of tracing costs
to products for inventory valuation and profit measurement purposes. If the actual number of
physical units in inventory is known then the value of inventory is simply obtained by
multiplying the standard cost per unit by the physical units. This is because, profit measurement
may be time consuming thus making it cumbersome to allocate costs as per the period incurred.
Variances are calculated later and written off in the books of account as period costs. This
enables the reflection of inventory at actual cost while at the same time determining the correct
profit figure.
(iv) Decision making

Standard costing provides a prediction of the future costs that can be used for decision making
purposes. Standard costs are preferable to estimates based on adjusted past costs because the
later may incorporate avoidable inefficiencies.
(v) Management by exception

Standard costing is an example of management exception. By studying the variances,
management’s attention is directed towards those items that are not proceeding as per the plan.
Most of management‟s time is saved and can be directed to other value adding activities.
Management only concentrates on the few exceptions reported.
(vi) Motivation
A standard costing system provides a challenging target that individuals are motivated to strive
and achieve. Involving the management and employees at all levels of operation in the setting of

standards makes them feel as part of the system thus working to meet the standards that they set
for themselves.
(vii) Pricing
Standard costs act as a reliable base of calculating total cost of producing a good or service to
which a margin can be added to determine the selling price. (Cost plus markup method of price
determination)
(viii) Cost reductionE

The process of setting, revising and monitoring standards encourages reappraisal of methods
materials and techniques thus leading to cost reductions. Analysis of variance (Anova) directs
cost analysis to factors that are causing unfavorable variances and thus costs can be controlled,
leading to cost reduction.
TYPES OF STANDARDS
Following are different types of standards:
 Basic standards
 Normal standards
 Current standards
 Attainable (expected) standards
 Ideal (theoretical) standards
Basic standards
These are standards established considering those factors that are basic in nature and remain
unchanged over a long period of time and are altered only when the business operations change
significantly affecting the very basic foundations of the entity and nature of busienss. These
standards help compare business operations over a longer period of time. Basic standards are
used not only to evaluate actual results but also current expected results (current standards). We
can say that basic standards work as a standard for other standards. As basic standards are not
updated according to latest circumstances thus they are not used often as they cannot help in
short term period variance analysis.
Normal Standards
These are such standards which are expected if normal circumstances prevail. Term normal
represents the normal conditions of the business in the absence of any unexpected fluctuations
(either favourable or unfavourable). Even through normal standards are more of a theoretical in
nature as reality cannot be sufficiently predicted with all its fluctuations in advance. Also,
circumstances may change in such a way that factors which were expected to be controllable are
not so controllable by the mangers. Thus it has limited application in today’s business
environment. However, normal standards acts as a good yardstick that represents challenging yet
attainable results and can be used by management in such environment which is simple in nature
and is not prone to great fluctuations.

Current standards
These standards are representative of current business conditions. These are mostly short term in
nature and are widely used as they are the most relevant standards to be used for control
purposes. These standards represent the state that business currently achieving or must achieve.
Attainable standards / Expected standards
These standards are based on current conditions and circumstances and represents what can be
attained with the present setup in place and if the current conditions prevail. Current standards
may be set lower or easier then expected standards but good managers always try to achieve
what is attainable so that no resource is left unused. It means that attainable standards are
representative of the potential that business is capable to achieve. For example a machinery is
expected to run for 4,000 hours where it can run for 5,000. Thus current standard is 4,000 hours
where attainable is 5,000 hours. These standards are useful as they help management to analyze
their performance and to use the unused potential at the right time.
Ideal standards / Theoretical standards.
These standards represents what business operations would be under ideal set of circumstances
where everything is running at the optimum level with an ideal balance. These standards are
representative of long term goals rather than for short term performance measurement. But with
the advancement of technology and inventions even the ideal standards become attainable over
the period of time but with every step taken forward and every question answered, more
questions and more complexities pop up and its in human nature that it always extends the way
forward with every milestone achieved. Therefore, ideal standards are not meant to be achieved
rather to act like a guiding star.
Which type of standard should be selected?
This is not like that one standard is always good and the other always bad. Its all relative. It is a
matter of situation and involves judgment to decide which standard is suitable for a particular
situation and which can provide relevant and reliable information which is also easily available
and applicable. Therefore, it depends on the requirements on the basis of which it is determined
what type of standard is suitable for use.
For example, in financial or environmental crisis it will be good if management stick with
current standards rather than using attainable standards as even maintaining current standards is
sometime difficult.
On the other hand if management is of the opinion that circumstances are favourable and also the
resources available are capable of facing a challenge then it may switch to attainable or even
normal standards and a bit to the extreme ideal standards where ideal standards may help to
motivate staff to perform at its peak.

PRINCIPLES/PROCESS OF SETTING STANDARDS
Establishing a correct standard is very important because accuracy of the standards usually
determine the success of the standard cost system. It is more of an art than a science which
requires combined thinking and expertise of all the persons who have responsibility over prices
and quantities of input.
As we will see later, the standard cost system has very serious behavioral implications for the
staff whose performance will be measured against the standards. If the staff feels that the
standards are too high, (unachievable), they will be frustrated and will be greatly demotivated.
Also, if a disciplinary action is taken on an employee who fails to achieve the standards, but the
employees feel that it is unfair as the standard was inaccurate, this will bring about resentment,
sabotage and demotivation to the employees. On the other hand, if the standards are too low,
they will be easily achieved by employees and they will not be challenged to work harder.
In determining standard cost, each cost should be carefully analyzed to ensure all factors
affecting the cost level (in the period the costs are to be used) have been considered. In addition,
managers in charge of the departments responsible for meeting the standards should approve the
bases for the standards.
For the standard setting process and standards implementation to be successful, the employees
responsible for meeting the standards should have the opportunity to participate in the Standard
Setting Process. They are the best positioned in pinpointing inaccuracies in the set standards.
It is easier to enforce standards once their acceptance is solicited through participation in the
setting process.
The manager overseeing the setting of standards should also have an honest desire to set
achievable targets, and also to assist their lower managers and employees to achieve them.
Also, standards should only be set after there has been interaction between all the individuals
involved.
Last, and very important, the top management must fully support the standard costing process
from Standards Setting to standards implementation. This support gives the standards the
enforcement they need to be effected in the whole organization.
THE STANDARD COST CARD
A standard cost card contains an itemization of the standard amounts of materials, labor, and
overhead required to create one unit of a product. The card also multiplies the standard cost of
each of these line items to arrive at the total standard cost of a product. The card has two
purposes:

 To derive the standard cost of a product
 To serve as the basis for variance analysis when actual costs for the product are compiled
The number of units and their standard costs that are listed on the card should be reviewed and
possibly revised regularly, due to all of the following factors. Otherwise, the standard cost card
will gradually diverge from the actual results experienced when manufacturing a product.
 The standard cost card is comprised of the expected quantities of materials to be used
during the production process, which can vary somewhat from the actual amounts used.
For example, it may contain a certain amount of scrap that may be higher or lower than
the actual amount experienced. Also, the amount of spoilage encountered during the
setup of a production run may also vary from the standard amount listed in the standard
cost card.
 The standard costs listed on the card may also vary from actual results. For example,
there may be an expectation to purchase a component for $1.00, but because it was
actually purchased in a smaller unit quantity than anticipated when the standard was
created, the supplier charges a higher price per unit.
 The standard amount of labor stated on the card may be incorrect, because of changes in
worker efficiency, altered equipment configurations, changes in the mix of experience
levels used in a production team, and so forth.
 Similarly, the standard cost of the labor stated on the card may be incorrect, because of
changes in the wages paid to employees, or in the amount of overtime paid, or in the mix
of employees used in the manufacturing process.
 The standard amount of overhead allocated to the product may also vary from actual
results, since it is based on a combination of an expected pool of overhead costs and an
expected volume of production to be generated during the period. If either estimate varies
from actual results, then there will be a difference between the standard overhead cost
and the actual overhead cost.
A physical card is rarely used to store standard costs. Instead, this information is stored in the
computer system and printed as needed.
Example of a Standard Cost Card
The following is a simplified version of the layout of a standard cost card. An actual card would
itemize the individual components in the product.
Units Cost Extension
Materials 3.7 $7.25 $26.83
Labor 1.2 5.50 6.60
Overhead 1.0 14.00 14.00
Total $47.43

Illustration
SK‟s ltd. produces a product B which consumes 2 types of materials, A56 and C91, and
passesthrough 3 departments X, Y and Z. The following information relates to the product B and
its production process;
Materials: A56: 5 kg each @ Shs.7.4: it is applied in department A

C91: 500 units @ Shs.7.50 per 100 units: It is applied in department B.
Labour for the period just ended:
4.8 hours @ Shs.2.5/hr in Department A

9.2 hours @ Shs.2.5/hr in Department B.
16.4 hours @ Shs.1.75/hr in Department C.
Absorption of Production overheads:
Machine overheads: based on direct labour hours. They are incurred as Shs.11/hr indepartments
A and B.
Indirect labour: based on direct labour hours in Department C above at Shs.6/hr.
Required
Prepare a standard cost card for product B.

Solution:
BEHAVIOURIAL ASPECTS OF STANDARD COSTING

Because of the detailed nature of standard costing and Involvement with foremen and production
workers, communication becomes even greater importance. Production workers frequently
regard any form of performance evaluation with deep suspicion and if a cost-conscious,
cost conscious, positive
attitude is to be developed, close attention must be paid to the behavioral aspects of the system.
Full participation, realistic standards, prompt and accurate reporting, no undue pressure or
censure - all contribute to an acceptable system. Remember if the system is not accepted by the
people involved it will be unworkable.

VARIANCES ANALYSIS
Variance analysis deals with the systematic evaluation of variances. Refers to an examination of
the conditions of operations which give rise to any cost variance It also provides management
with a n explanation as to why the variance has occurred. This indirectly helps the management
to take suitable steps to control costs wherever necessary
Variance can be split into two types; variance showing
- Price difference and/or
- Quantity and volume difference
Standards may be set and variance can be calculated for each element of cost (such material,
labour, and overheads). It is also possible to calculate variance for each of the factors such as
(price, volume and so on) which determine the cost.
The variance can either be favorable or unfavorable (adverse). In order to determine whether the
variance is favorable or adverse, we need to consider its impact on the profit of the entity
A cost variance (such as material price or labour rate variance etc.) is favorable if the actual cost
is less than the standard cost and vise- versa
A sales variance such as sales margin price or volume variance etc) is favorable if the actual
profit exceeds the standard the cost and vise –versa
In general there are four causes variance namely

- Inaccurate recording of actual costs and revenues
- Random events(e.g. an accident may damage raw materials used for production causing
adverse material variance)
- Operating efficiency
- Setting in appropriate standards
Fundamental concepts in brief

1. There are two basic dimensions to variances: price and quantity
2. A price variance is always calculated for actual quantity
3. A quantity variance is always calculated using standard price
4. The sales variances are favorable (F) when actual figures are greater than standards and
are adverse when actual figures are lower than standards
5. The cost variance (except fixed overhead efficiency variances and fixed overhead
capacity variance) are favorable when actual figures are lower than standards and are
adverse when (A) when actual figures are lower than standards
6. Budgeted (costs or sales) signified estimated total (costs or sales) for a budget period as
considered in the budget whereas standards (cost or sales) are budgeted (costs or sales)
per unit

7. Wherever standard quantity is mentioned it should be given as budgeted interpreted as
standard quantity for actual production. Many times standard quantity may be given as
budgeted quantity in exam
8. If standard cost is give n per unit, calculate the total standard cost for the actual level of
activity
9. For variable and fixed overheads, wherever absorption rates are given the rates are to be
presumed as standard rates
BASIC VARIANCES
Material variance
Total direct material cost variance
The direct material total cost variance signifies the difference between the actual material cost
and the standard material cost for the actual production
If actual material cost is greater than the standard material for the actual production, the variance
is adverse (A); otherwise the variance is favorable (F)
The total material cost variance is made up of two elements
- The material price variance ; Which is the difference between the actual price of the
materials and the standard price for the actual quantity of goods made
- The material usage variance; which is the difference between what has actually used and
under standard terms at standard material price
If actual consumption is greater than the quantity of material purchased, actual materials costs
for calculation of direct material cost variance) should be derived 2from as the sum of the actual
cost of purchase of raw materials and the extent of opening inventory consumed at standard price
Total direct material cost variance=Standard material cost for actual production – Actual material
cost
Where material cost=Actual cost of usage of raw material out of current year’s purchase+ Extent
of opening inventory consumed at standard price (if there is opening inventory of material)
The total of material purchased is different from the materials actually used and raw materials
inventories are valued at standard cost
The material variance will be calculated based on the actual quantity of purchase whereas the
material usage variance would signifies the difference between actual usage and standard usage
Direct material price variance

The direct material price variance signifies the difference between the actual price and the
standard price multiply by the actual quantity purchased
A direct material price variance occurs when raw materials are purchased at a price different
from the standard price. Direct material price arises due to fluctuations in market price,

purchasing non-standard lots and the consequent reduction in quantity discount, increase in or
additional transport cost for a quick delivery making advantage of cash discount, etc.
If actual raw material price is greater than the standard raw material price, it is indicative of
incurring high cost in raw materials and therefore the variance is adverse (A) and otherwise
variance is favorable (F)
Direct material price variance

=ACTUAL QUANTITY PURCHASED X (STANDARD PRICE – ACTUAL PRICE)
MPV = AQ (S.P – A.P)
Direct material usage Variance

Direct material usage variance represents the difference between the actual quantities of raw
materials used in production and the standard quantities that should have been used in actual
production multiplied by standard price. Standard quantity for actual production should be
calculated because it helps to know whether the material is properly used in production in the
production or not
The actual quantities of raw materials used in production is greater than the standard quantities,
the variance is adverse (A); otherwise the variance is favorable (F)
A direct material usage variance is caused on account of subsequent or defective materials,
carelessness in
The use or handling of materials, pilferage of raw materials, wastage due to inefficient
production methods or unskilled employees
Direct material variance=Standard Price = (Standard Quantity – Actual Quantity)
MUV= SP (SQ – AQ)
NOTE
Material Cost Variance
This is the difference between the standard material cost allowed for the production level
achieved and the actual material cost incurred
Material Cost Variance = Standard Cost – Actual Cost.
Material Price Variance + Material Usage Variance = Material Cost Variance
I.E (S.Q x S.P) – (A.Q x A.P)

Causes
i) Fluctuations on prices
ii) Efficiency or inefficiency in the usage of the materials caused by:
a) Mixing the materials in different proportion
b) Difference in the field of the materials
iii) Use of substitute materials
iv) Use of wrong standards or estimates
Material mix variance

This is that portion of material usage variance arising from mixing the materials in different
proportions from the standard mix ratios.
= STANDARD PRICE (ACTUAL MIX IN STANDARD PROPORTIONS – ACTUAL MIX)
Material yield variance

This is that portion of the material wage variance arising from the difference between the actual
output and the standard or expected output.
= standard cost x (standard yield /output – actual yield)
NB: Material Mix variance + Material Yield Variance= Material Usage Variance.
Illustration
BCH Ltd. Produces a type of liquid fertilizer .The production of this liquid fertilizer requires
three different types of chemicals namely: Exe , Wye and Zed .The chemicals are mixed in the
proportion of 0.4,0.3 and 0.3 respectively and their standard costs are sh.12,sh.7 and sh.5
respectively
a) In recent past the standard yield has been 80% on 100 litres of the chemical mix.
b) .The company maintains a policy of not carrying any raw materials, as storage space is
limited.
c) Annual production of liquid fertilizer has been set at 8,320,000 litres.
d) In the month of April 2006, the company produced 150,000 litres ofthe fertilizer at a total
cost of sh.1,708,000 .Actual number of litres used and cost per litre for the three chemicals
were as follows:
Chemicals Litres Cost per litre

Sh.
Exe 90,000 11.00
Wye 70,000 8.40
Zed 40,000 5.50

The company had expected the usage of Exe ,Wye and Zed chemicals to be 75,000,56250 and
56,250 respectively.
Required;-
(i) Material price variance
(ii) Material yield variance
(iii) Material mix variance
Solution
(A) Material price variance. = actual quantity (standard price – actual price)
Exe: 90000 (12-11) = 90,000 (F)
Wye: 70000 (7-8.40) = 98,000 (A)
Zed: 40000 (3-5.50) = 20,000 (A)
28000 (A)
(B) Material yield variance = Standard Cost per unit (Standard Output – Actual Output)
Standard Cost per Unit
Exe: 12 x 0.4 =4.8
Wye: 7 x 0.3 = 2.1
Zed: 5 x 0.3 = 1.5
8.4
Standard Output = 80% of Material. Mix
1 Litre of 0.8 of Outputs = 8.4
8.4
= 1 = ℎ 10.5
0.8
Standard Output (80%)
Total
Standard Output = Inputs x 80%
200000 x 80%
= 160000
Therefore Material Yield Variance = 10.5 (160,000 – 150000) = 105,000 A.
(C) Material Mix Variance = Selling price ( Actual mix in standard Proportion – Actual Mix)
Actual Mix Actual Mix in Standard Proportion
Exe: 90000 0.4 ×200,000 : 80000
Wye: 70000 0.3 ×200,000 : 60000
Zed: 40000 0.3×200,000 : 60000
20000

Material Mix Variance =
Exe 12(80000 – 90000) =120,000 (A)
Wye 7(60000 – 70000) = 70,000 (A)
Zed 5(60000 – 40000) = 100,000 (F)
90,000 (A)
(D) Material Usage Variance = S.P. (SQ – A.Q)

Standard Quantity
Input:
Exe: 0.4 ×187500 = 7,500L
Wye: 0.3 × 187500 = 56,250L
Zed: 0.3 ×187500 = 56,250L
Material Usage Variance =

Exe 12(75,000 – 90,000) =180,000 (A)
Wye 7(56,250 – 70,000) =96,250 (A)
Zed 5(50,250 – 40,000) =81,250 (F)
195,000 (A)
Reconciliation
Material Mix Variance = 90,000 (A)
Material Yield Variance = 105,000 (A)
195,000 (A)
Causes of mix variances

a) Mix variances
Favorable Mix variance arises when less of more expensive material and more of the cheaper
materials are used. For instance, in the example above, 128 (F) arises because less of more
expensive material X has been used and more of the cheaper materials Y and Z
b) Yield variance
Favorable yield variance arises when the output is less than expected: when the actual loss
exceeds the normal loss. Use of cheaper but low quality materials may result to a drop in good
production. For instance, the change to a cheaper mix of material has resulted in the drop in yield
of good production in relation to the standard.
LABOUR COST VARIANCE

This is the difference between the standard labour cost allowed for the production level achieved
and the actual labour cost incurred.

Total direct labour Cost Variance
The total labour cost variance is the difference between the standard direct wages for actual
production and the actual direct wages paid.
If the standard wages for actual production are greater than the actual direct wages paid this
indicates that the labour cost incurred was lower than estimated and therefore the variance is
favorable (F); otherwise the variance is Adverse (A)
Direct labour cost variance = Standard direct wages for production – Actual direct wages paid
= (Standard labour hours for actual production × Standard wages rate Hour)-(Actual labour
hours × Actual wages rate per hour
The total direct labour cost variance is made up of two elements

The direct labour rate variance; which gives the difference between the actual rate of labour
and the standard rate per hour for the actual hours worked
The labour efficiency variance; which is the difference between what was actually used and
what should have been used under standard terms at the standard labour rate.
Direct labour rate variance

The direct labour rate represents the difference between the standard wages rate per hour and the
actual wage rate per hour of the actual hours worked
If the actual direct labour is greater than the standa6d rate, this indicates that higher costs for
direct labour have been incurred compared to the estimated costs and therefore the variance is
adverse (A)
; Otherwise the variance is favorable (F)
The causes of labour rate variances usually are changes in basic wage rates, new workers being
paid different rates from standard rates, different rates being paid to workers employed to meet
seasonal demands or to do urgent work etc.
Direct labour rate variance= (Standard wage rate per hour – Actual wage rate per hour) ×Actual
labour hours
LRV = AH (S.R – A.R)
Causes rate variance

a) Higher rates being paid than planned due to wage (increase) awards.
b) Higher or lower grade of workers being used than planned.
c) Payment of unplanned overtime or bonus.
Labour efficiency variance

This is that portion of labour cost variants arising as a result working for more or less hours in
production than expected.
Labour Efficiency variance = Standard rate (Standard Labour hours – Actual labour hours
worked)

LEV = SR (S.H – A.H)
Causes of labour efficiency variance

a) Use of incorrect grade of labour e.g. poorly trained personnel.
b) Poor workshop organization or supervision.
c) Incorrect materials or machine problems.
d) Use of better quality labour
e) Increase labour or decrease labour efficiency.
NOTE;
In some cases, there may be some hours paid which was non-productive i.e. idle time. Idle time
is the difference between the hours paid and hours worked.
This gives rise to idle time variance
Idle time V = Standard rate (Hrs. paid – Hrs. worked) or Standard rate (idle time)
Labour cost variance

LCV = (S.H x S.R) – A.H x A.R)
Labour rate Variance Labour efficiency Variance
LRV = AH (S.R – A.R) LEV = SR (S.H – A.H)
Labour Mix Variance Labour Quantity / Yield variance

1) LQV = S.R (S.H in S mix- A. H in S. mix)
LMV = SR (AH in S. mix – A.H in A mix) 2) LYV = S.C (S. Yield – A. Yield)
OVERHEADS VARIANCES
Variable production overhead variances
The variable production overhead total variance can be subdivided into the variable production
overhear expenditure variance and the variable production overhead efficiency variance (based
on actual hours)
Fixed production overhead variances

The fixed production overhead total variance can be subdivided into an expenditure variance and
a volume variance. The fixed production overhead volume variance can be further subdivided
into an efficiency and capacity variance.

The fixed overhead expenditure variance
The fixed overhead expenditure variance occurs if the numerator is incorrect. It measures the
under- or over-absorbed overhead caused by the actual total overhead being different from the
budgeted total
overhead.
Therefore, fixed overhead expenditure variance = budgeted (planned) expenditure –Actual
Expenditure.
The fixed overhead volume variance

As we have already stated, the fixed overhead volume variance is made up of the following sub-
variances.
 Fixed overhead efficiency variance
 Fixed overhead capacity variance
These variances arise if the denominator (i.e. the budgeted activity level) is incorrect.
The fixed overhead efficiency and capacity variances measure the under- or over-absorbed
overhead
caused by the actual activity level being different from the budgeted activity level used in
calculating the absorption rate.
How to calculate the variances

The following definitions express how each overhead variance should be calculated.
- Fixed overhead total variance is the difference between fixed overhead incurred and
fixed overhead
absorbed. In other words, it is the under- or over-absorbed fixed overhead.
- Fixed overhead expenditure variance is the difference between the budgeted fixed
overhead
expenditure and actual fixed overhead expenditure.
- Fixed overhead volume variance is the difference between actual and budgeted (planned)
volume
multiplied by the standard absorption rate per unit.
- Fixed overhead volume efficiency variance is the difference between the number of
hours that actual production should have taken, and the number of hours actually taken
(that is, worked) multiplied by- the standard absorption rate per hour.
- Fixed overhead volume capacity variance is the difference between budgeted (planned)
hours of work and the actual hours worked, multiplied by the standard absorption rate per
hour.

Total overhead cost variance
TOCV = Standard OH cost – Actual OH cost
Variable OH cost variance Fixed OH cost variance
V. OH efficiency productivity F. OH expenditure variance F. OH volume variance

V. OH expenditure variance FOEV = B.FOH - AFOH FOW =
variance VOPV = VOAR (S.H – A.H) S.C (B.V – A.V)
VOEV =
A.H (VOAR – A.R)
F. OH efficiency / F. OH capacity
productivity variance variance
Where;
TOCV isTotal overhead cost variance
OH is overhead
VOH is variable overhead
VOCV is variable overhead cost variance
FOCV is fixed overhead cost variance
VOEV is variable overhead expenditure variance
AH isactual hours
SH is standard hour
VOAR isvariable overhead absorption rate
VOPV is variable overheads productivity variance
FOEV is fixed overheads efficiency variance
BFOH is the budgeted fixed overheads
AFOH is the actual fixed overheads
BV is the budgeted volume
AV is the actual volume
Illustration
A company uses absorption costing for both internal and external reporting purposes as it has a
considerable level of fixed production costs. The following information has been recorded for the
past year.

Budgeted fixed production overheads Sh. 2,500,000
Budgeted ( Normal ) activity levels:
Units 62,500 units
Labour hours 500,000 hours
Actual fixed production overheads Sh. 2,890,350
Actual levels of activity:
Units produced 70,000 units
Labour hours 525,000 hours
Required:
a) Calculate the fixed production overhead expenditure and volume variances and briefly
explain what each variance shows.
b) Calculate the fixed production overhead efficiency and capacity variance and briefly explain
what each variance shows:
Solution
a) Fixed production overhead Expenditure variance
Fixed overhead expenditure variance = (Actual expenditure on fixed overhead – Budgeted fixed
Overhead)
= sh. (2,890,350 – 2,500,000)
= sh. 390,350 ( A)
This variance indicates that the company has spent more than originally budgeted.
Fixed production indicates that the company has spent more than originally budgeted.
Fixed production overhead volume variance

Fixed overhead volume variance = Fixed overhead absorption rate per hour x (Budgeted hours –
Standard hours required for actual production)
= (560,000 (W1) – 500,000) hours x sh. 5 per hour (W2)
= sh. 300,000 (F)
Workings
Standard hours required for actual activity
For that first we shall calculate
Budgeted hours per unit = 500,000 hours / 62,500 units = 8 hours per unit
Standard hours required for actual activity = Actual units x Budgeted hours per unit
= 70,000 units x 8 hours per unit
= 560,000 hours.

W2
Budgeted Fixed overhead
Fixed overhead Absorption Rate (FOAR) =
Budgeted Activity ( s tan dard hours)
= sh. 2,500,000 / 500, 000 hours = sh. 5 per hour.
This variance indicates that the company has used more labor than originally budgeted.
b)Fixed production overhead Efficiency variance.

Fixed overhead Efficiency variance = Fixed overheads absorption rate x (Actual hours worked or
paid – standard hours required for actual production).
= sh. 5 x (525,000 – 560,000) hours

= sh. 175,000 (F)
This variance shows that labour worked for more hours than was originally budgeted thereby
exceeding the budgeted capacity.
SALES VARIANCES
These can be used to analyze the performance of the sales function or revenue centers.
N.B. Sales variance calculations are calculated in terms of profit or contribution margin rather
than sales values. It sales values are used (actual sales compared to budgeted) there’s the risk of
ignoring the impact of the sales effort on profit. When we say profit margins, we assume
absorption costing and contribution margin when we are marginal costing.
Total sales variance

Total sales variances signifies the variance in profit (in absorption costing) or in contribution in
marginal costing as a results of the combined impact of change in price and sales volume.
Similarly total sales value variance signifies the difference between the actual and budgeted sales
If actual sales /actual margins is greater than the budgeted sales / budgeted margin the variance is
favorable (F) and otherwise it is adverse (A)
Under absorption costing environment
Total Sales value variance=Actual sales – Budgeted

sales
Total sales profit variance=Actual profit-Budgeted
profit

Under marginal costing environment
Total sales margin (contribution) variance= Actual margin – Budgeted margin
Sales price and volume variance

The actual price variance signifies the variance between the actual selling price per unit and the
standard selling price per unit multiplied by the actual quantity of units sold
The variance identifies that the units are sold for more or less than their standard selling price
and the overall impact on revenue due to the customers and therefore the variance is favorable
(F) and otherwise is adverse (A). Sales price is calculated both under marginal costing
environment and absorption costing environment.
Under the absorption costing method sales price variance is calculated as follows
Sale price variance= (Actual selling price per unit-Standard selling price per unit) × Actual
quantity sold
OR
Sales (profit margin) variance = (Actual profit margin – Standard profit margin) ×Actual sales
volume
= [Actual sales price-Standard cost per unit) - (Standard sales price-Standard cost per unit)] ×
Act6ual sales volume
In a marginal costing environment, sales price variance is calculated as
Sales price margin variance

= (Actual contribution margin – Standard contribution margin) × Actual sales volume
= (Actual sales price-Standard variable cost per unit)-Standard sales price- Standard cost per
unit) × Actual sales volume
If the margin is greater than the standard the standard margin the variance is favorable (F);
otherwise is adverse (A)
The sales variance signifies the difference between the actual quantities sold and the budgeted
quantity, multiplied by either the standard profit per unit or standard contribution per unit .It
should be noted that, in absorption costing, the standard profit per unit is used, whereas in
marginal costing environment Standard contribution per unit is used.
The variance identifies whether the standard quantity or sales exceeded the budgeted quantity
measures the overall impact of change in sales volume on profit or contribution 7of the case may
be

If actual sale volume is greater than the standard sales volume the variance is favorable (F);
otherwise the variance is adverse (A)
Sales volume variance = (Actual sales quantity- Budgeted sales quantity) - Standard profit per
unit or Standard contribution per unit)
Sales margin variance (SMV)

SMV = (B.Q x B. Cont) – (A.Q x A. Con)
Sales margin price variance Sales margin volume variance
SMPV = A.Q (B. Cont – A. cont) SMVV = B. cont (B.Q – A.Q)
Sales margin mix variance Sales margin quantity / yield variance

SMMV = B. cont. (A. Q in s. mix – A.Q in A. mix SMQV = B. cont. (B.Q – A.Q in s. mix)
Where;
B. cont. is the budgeted contribution
BQ is budgeted quantity
AQ is the actual quantity
A cont. is the actual contribution
SMMV is Sales margin mix variance
SMQV is Sales margin quantity yield variance
ILLUSTRATION
From the information provided below, calculate the following variances:
standard Actual
Qty.(units) Unit Cost/ Total Qty. Unit Cost/unit Total
sales unit sales (units) sales (sh.) sales
price price(sh.)
(sh.)
A 2,000 4 3.5 8,000 2,200 4.10 3.70 9,020
B 2,500 5 4 12,500 2,000 5.25 4.30 10,500
C 1,750 6 5.25 10,500 2,000 5.75 5 11,500
6,250 31,000 6,200 3,020

i) sales price variance
ii) sales margin price variance
iii) sales volume variance
iv) sales margin volume variance
v) total sales value variance
vi) total sales margin variance
Solution
Sales price variance = (actual selling price per unit – standard selling price per unit) x actual
quantity
Product A = sh. (10 – 4) × 2,200 == sh. 220(F)
Product B = sh. (5.25 – 5) ×2,000 = shs.500 (F)
Product C = sh. (5.75 – 6) ×2,000 = sh.500 (A)
Sales price margin variance = Actual contribution margin (W1) – standard contribution margin
(W2) x actual sales volume.
Product A = sh. (0.60 – 0.50) x 2,200 = sh.220 (F)
Product B = sh. (1.25 – 1) x 2,000 = sh. 500(F)
Product C = (0.50 – 0.75) x sh.2,000 = sh. 500 (A)
Workings
W1 actual margin
A = sh4.10 - sh3.50 = sh0.60
B = sh. 5.25 – sh. 4 = sh. 1.25
C = sh. 5.75 – sh. 5.25 = sh. 0.50
W2 budget margin
A = sh. 4 - sh3.50 = sh. 0.50
B = sh. 5 – sh. 4 = $ 1
C = sh. 6 – sh. 5.25 = sh. 0.75
Sales volume variance =

(Actual sales quantity – Budgeted sales quantity) × Standard price per unit
Product A = sh. (2,200 – 2,000) × sh. 4 = 800 (F)
Product B = (2,000- 2,500) × sh. 5 = sh.2, 500 (A)
Product C = (2,000 – 1,750) × sh. 6 = sh. 1,500(F)
Sales margin volume variance

(Actual sales quantity – Budgeted sales quantity) x standard profit per unit
Product A = (2,200 – 2,000) x sh.0.50 = sh.100(F)

Product B = (2,000 – 2,500) x sh. 1 = 500 (A)
Product C = (2,000 – 1,750) x sh. 0.75 = sh. 187.5 (F)
Total sales value variance = Actual sales – Budgeted sales

Product A = sh. 9,020 – sh. 8,000 = sh.1,020(F)
Product B = sh.10,500 – sh.12,500 = sh. 2,000(A)
Product C (11,500 – sh. 10,500 = sh. 1,000(F)
Total sales margin variance = Actual margin – budgeted margin

Product A = (2,200 ×sh0.60) – (2,000 × sh. 0.50) = sh. 320(F)
Product B = (2,000×sh. 1.25) – (2,500 ×sh. 1) = sh.nil
Product C = (2,000 ×sh. 0.50) – (1,750×sh.0.75) = sh. 312.5 (A)
Illustration
Cole Dale Ltd. Manufactures and sells product CC. The company operates a standard marginal
costing system. The standard cost card for CC includes the following:
Sh. Per
unit
Direct materials 20
Direct labour (6 hours @ sh. 7.50 per hour 45
)
Variable production overheads 27
Total 92
The budgeted and actual activity levels for the last quarter were as follows:
Units
Budget Actual
Sales 20,000 19,000
Production 20,000 21,000
The actual cost incurred last quarter were;-

Sh.
Direct materials 417,900
Direct labour (124,950 hours) 949,620
Variable production overheads 565, 740

Required:
a) Calculate the total variances for the direct material , direct labour and variable production
overheads.
b) Provide an appropriate breakdown of the total variance for direct labour calculated in part (a)
above.
c) Suggest two possible causes of each variance calculated in (b)
Solution
a) Material variance
Direct material variance
= standard quantity for actual production at standard price – Actual quantity at actual price
= sh.20 x 21,000 units) – sh.417,900
= sh.420,00 – sh.417,900=
= sh.2,100 (F)
Direct labour variance

= standard hours for actual production at standard rate – actual hours at actual rate
= (21,000 units x sh. 45) – sh.949,620
= sh.945,000 – sh.949, 620
= sh.4, 620 (F)
Variable production overhead variance

= standard cost of actual production – Actual cost of production
= 21,000 units x sh.27) – sh.565,740
= sh.567,000 – sh.565,740
= sh.1,260
b) Labour variance
Direct labour rate variance
= Actual hours at actual rate – Actual hours at standard rate.
= sh.949,620 – (124,950 hrs. x sh.7.50)
= sh. 949,620 – sh. 937, 125
= sh. 12,495
Direct labour efficiency variance

= standard hours for actual production at standard rate – Actual hours at standard rate
=(6 hrs. x 21,000 units x sh. 7.5) – ( 124,950 hrs. x sh. 7.5 )
= sh. 945,000 – sh. 937,125
= sh. 7,875 (F)
Breakdown of the total direct labour variance is as follows

Total direct labour variance = direct labour rate variance + direct labour efficiency variance
= sh.12,945 (A) + sh. 7,875 (F)
= sh. 4,620 (A)
c) Causes of direct labour rate and efficiency variance
i) Direct labour rate variance
- High graded workers paid at a higher rate.
- New workers being paid at rates different from the standard rates
- Higher than expected wage settlement for the company
ii) Direct labour efficiency variance
- Highly motivated workers
- Insufficient training
- Incomplete supervision
- Workers dissatisfaction
- Bad working conditions
- Use of defective machinery and equipment etc.
Illustration
From the following information of lucky Plc calculate.
Budgeted Actual
Product A Product B Product A Product B
Units 400 800 480 790
Sales price Shs.5 Shs.4 Shs.4.75 Shs.3.9
Cost Shs.4.5 Shs. 3 Shs.4.6 Shs.2.9
a) Sales price variance

b) Sales margin price variance
c) Sales volume variance
d) Total sales value variance
e) Total sales margin variance.
Solution
a) Sales price variance = (Actual selling price per unit – standard selling price per unit) x
actual quantity sold.
Product A = sh. (4.74 – 5 ) x 480 units = sh. 120
Product B = sh. (3.9 – 4 ) x 790 units = sh. 79 (A)
b) Sales margin price variance = (actual contribution margin – standard contribution

margin) × actual sales volume.

Product A = sh. (0.25 – 0.25) × 480 units = sh. 120 (A)
Product B = sh. (0.90 – 1) × 790 units = sh. 79 (A)
Workings
W1 standard contribution margin
A = sh.(5 – 4.50) = sh. 0.50
B = sh. (4 – 3) = sh.1
W2 Actual contribution margin

A = sh. (4.75 – 4.5 ) = sh. 0.25
B = sh. (3.9 – 3) = sh. 0.90
c) Sales margin volume variance = (Actual quantity – Budgeted quantity ) x standard margin
Product A = (480 – 400) units × sh. 0.50 = sh. 40(F)
Product B = (790 – 800) units ×sh.1 = sh. 10(A)
d) Total sales value variance = Actual sales – budgeted sales

Product A = sh. 2,280 –shs. 2,000 = sh. 280 (F)
Product B = sh. 3,081 –shs. 3,200 = sh. 119(A)
e) Total sales margin variance = actual margin – budgeted margin

Product A = (480 units ×sh. 0.25) – (400 units × sh. 0.50) = sh. 80 (A)
Product B = (790 units × sh. 0.9) – (800 units × sh. 1) = sh. 89(A)
REVISION EXERCISE
QUESTION ONE
A company ahs budgeted to produce 2,750 articles in 22,000 hours, with fixed overheads of Sh
88,000 and variable overheads of Sh 55,000. The company’s production during the period of the
budget was 2,700 articles in 21,500 working hours with fixed overheads costing Sh 90,000 and
variable overheads Sh 58,000.
Required:
Calculate the following variances:
a) Overhead variance.
b) Fixed production overhead variance.
c) Variable production overhead variance.
d) Fixed production overhead expenditure variance.

e) Fixed production overhead volume variance.
f) Fixed cost productivity variance.
g) Capacity variance.
Solution:
a) Overhead Variance = Total Budgeted overheads – Total Actual Overheads

= (88,000 + 55,000) – (90,000 + 58,000)
=Shs 143,000 – Shs 148,000
= Shs 5,000A
b) Fixed Production Overhead Variance

= Actual Fixed Overheads – Standard Fixed Overheads
= Shs 90,000 – (2,700 x [88,000/2,750])
= Shs 90,000 – 86,400
= Shs 3,600(A)
c) Variable Production Overhead Variance

= Actual Variable Overheads – Standard Variable Overheads
= 58,000 – [2,700 x (55,000/2,750)]
= 58,000 – 54,000
= Shs 4,000(A)
d) Fixed Production Overhead Expenditure Variance

=90,000 – 88,000
= Shs 2,000(A)
e) Fixed Production Overhead Volume Variance

= (Budgeted – Actual Units) x Fixed Overhead Absorption Rate per unit
=(2,750 – 2,700) 32
= Shs 1,600(A)
f) fixed Production Overhead Efficiency or Productivity Variance

= (Actual Hours – Standard Hours) x F.O.A.R per hour
= (21,500 – 21,600) x 88,000/22,000
= 100(4)
= Shs 400F
g) Capacity Variance Also called Fixed Overhead Capacity Variance

= (Budgeted Hours – Actual Hours) F.O.A.R Per hour
= (22,000 – 21,500) 4
= Sh. 2,000(A)
QUESTION TWO
Tonga Ltd manufactures a single product whose cost structure is given below:
Sh Sh
Direct materials:
Material A (2 kg @ Sh 25 per kg) 50
Material B (3 litres @ Sh 75 per litre) 225 275
Direct labour (4 hours @ Sh 30 per hour) 120

Variable overheads 80
Fixed overheads 25
500
The variable and fixed overheads are absorbed on the basis of the direct labour hours.
During the year ended 31 October 2000, the company produced and sold 40,000 units and
incurred the following costs:
Sh. Sh.
Direct materials:
Material A (78,000 Kg) 205,000
Material B (121,000 Kg) 6,800,000 7,005,000
Direct labour (156,000 hours) 4,900,000
Variable overheads 3,000,000
Fixed overheads 900,000
Total cost 15,805,000
Required:
a) Material mix and yield variances.
b) Variable overhead expenditure and efficiency variances.
c) Standard cost card for 40,000 units.
Solution:
i) Material Mix Variance = (Standard Price of Standard Mix – Standard Price of Actual Mix)
But Standard Price of Standard Mix = Quantity Mixed× Standard Cost of Mix
Quantity per Mix

= 199,000×275 = Shs 10,945,000
5
Standard Price of Actual Mix: A: 78,000 × 25 = 1,950,000

B: 121,000 ×75= 9,075,000 Shs 11,025,000
Material Mix Variance = SH 10,945,000 – Sh.11, 025,000 = Sh. 80,000 (A)
Material Yield Variance = Standard Cost of Mix ( Standard Yield – Actual Yield)
= 275 (199,000 – 40,000) = Sh.55,000 F

5
Therefore Material Usage Variance = Material Mix Variance + Material Yield Variance
= 80,000 (A) + 55,000 (F) = Sh.25,000 A
ii) Variable Overhead Absorption Rate = Sh.80 = Sh. 20/hr = V.O.A.R

4 hrs
Fixed Overhead Absorption Rate = Sh.25 = 6.25/hr

4 hrs
Variable Overhead Expenditure Variance

= Actual Variable Overheads Incurred – Actual Hours x V.O.A.R
= Shs 3,000,000 – (156,000 x 20)
=Shs 3,000,000 – 3,120,000
= 120,000 Favourable
Variable Overhead Efficiency Variance

= (Actual Hours x V.O.A.R) – (Standard Hours x V.O.A.R)
= 3,120,000 – (40,000 x 4 x 20)
= 3,120,000 – 3,200,000
= 80,000 Favourable
NB: Variable Overhead Cost Variance = Standard Variable – Actual Variable

Overhead Overhead
= 3,200,000 – 3,000,000

= Shs200,000
= Variable Overhead + Variable Overhead

Expenditure Variance Efficiency Variance
iii)
Tonga Ltd
Standard Cost Card
Output Level: 40,000 Units
Cost Item: Sh.

Direct Material: A: 40,000 × 2×25: 2,000,000
B: 40,000 × 3 × 75 9,000,000
Total Material Cost 11,000,000
Direct Labour: (4×30 ×40,000) 4,800,000
Prime cost 15,800,000
Variable Overheads: (20 × 4×40,000) 3,200,000
19,000,000
Fixed Overheads: (4×6.25 × 40,000) 1,000,000
Total Production Cost 20,000,000
QUESTION THREE
Nyundo Ltd manufactures a product whose standard variable cost is given below:
Direct materials (2 kg @ Sh 3) 6
Direct labour (0.75 hours @ Sh 4) 3
Variable overheads 1
The company treats fixed costs as period costs and therefore they are not charged to products.
The following information relates to the month of March 2001.

1/3/2001 31/3/2001
Sh. Sh.
Stocks (all at standard cost)
Raw materials 12,000 6,000
Finished goods 36,000 42,500

The following information is available for the month of March 2001:
Sh.
Sales @ Sh. 20 per unit 200,000
Material purchases @ Sh. 3.50 per kg 42,000
Direct labour cost (8000 hours) 30,000
Variable overheads 12,000
Material price variance (adverse) 21,000
The management is wondering whether they could have performed better.

Required:
Calculate the following variances in each case stating two possible causes:
a) Material usage variance
b) Labour rate variance.
c) Labour efficiency variance.
d) Variable overhead expenditure variance:
e) Variable overhead efficiency variance.
f) Briefly comment on two possible causes of each variance in (i) above
Solution:
Nyundo Limited
a) Material usage Variance = Standard Price (Standard Quantity – Actual Quantity)
Actual Quantity of Raw Material used is computed as follows:
Cost (Shs) Unit cost Units

Opening Stock: 12,000 1.50 (i) 8,000
Purchases 42,000 3.50 12,000
54,000 20,000
Less closing stock (6,000) 2.50 (ii) (2,400)
Raw material used 48,000 17,600
Opening stocks assumed valued at standard price of Shs 3/2 kg = Shs 1.5
Closing stocks assumed an average of both opening stock and purchases (1.50 + 3.50) = Shs 2.50
2

Standard Quantity = Quantity expected to be used for the actual output.
Quantity produced is computed as follows:
Value (Shs) Unit cost Units

Opening Stock: 36,000 10 3,600
Sales 100,000 10 10,000
136,000 136,000
Less closing stock (42,500) 10 (4,250)
Production 93,500 9,350
NB: Units Cost at Standard = Sh 6 + Sh 3 + Sh 1 = Sh 10
9,350 units of production are expected to use: 2 kg x 9,350 = 18,700 kgs of raw material
Material usage Variance = 1.50 (18,700 – 17,600)
= Sh 1,650 (F)
(b) Labour rate variance = Actual Hours (Standard Rate – Actual Hours)
= 8,000 (4 – 3.75)
= Sh 2,000 (F)
(c)Labour efficiency variance = Standard Rate (Standard Hours – Actual Hours)
= 4 ( (9,350 x 0.75) – 8,000)
= Sh 3,950 (F)
(d)Variable Overhead Expenditure Variance = Actual Variable – (Actual hours × V.O.A.R)

Overheads
Where V.O.A.R = Variable Overhead Absorption Rate
= 12,000 – (8,000 x 1/0.75) = Sh 1,333 (A)
(e)Variable Overheads Efficiency Variance
= V.O.A.R (Actual labour hours – Standard labour hours

= 1 (8,000 – 9,350) = Shs 4,467 (F)
0.75
(f)Possible causes of:

Favourable Material Usage Variance:
- Good quality of labour
- High quality of material
- Optimum utilization of materials with little or no wastage
Favourable labour rate variance:

- Employment of lower cost labour
- Overestimated labour rate
- Reducing prices of labour in the market
Favourable labour efficiency variance

- High quality of labour
- Motivated labour force
- Underestimated standard output
Adverse variable overhead expenditure variance:

- Underestimated overheads absorption rate
- Lower output level than expected
- Increase in overheads during the period
Favourable variable overhead efficiency variance

- Less hours taken to produce units
- Increased efficiency in the output process

TOPIC 10
COST MANAGEMENT
VALUE CHAIN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT-DESIGN-PRODUCTION-
MARKETING DISTRIBUTION AND CUSTOMER CARE
VALUE CHAIN
A value chain is used to define the combination of all the activities and resources needed for
generating products and services. The value chain often consists of several operators
(manufacturing industry, wholesale trade, retail trade, customer, etc.) The value chain ends with
the customer.
Michael Porter introduced the value chain analysis concept in his 1985 book ‘ The Competitive
Advantage’ . Porter suggested that activities within an organisation add value to the service and
products that the organisation produces, and all these activities should be run at optimum level if
the organisation is to gain any real competitive advantage. If they are run efficiently the value
obtained should exceed the costs of running them i.e. customers should return to the organisation
and transact freely and willingly. Michael Porter suggested that the organisation is split into
‘primary activities’ and ‘support activities’.
Primary Activities
Inbound logistics : Refers to goods being obtained from the organisation's suppliers and to be
used for producing the end product.
Operations : Raw materials and goods are manufactured into the final product. Value is added to
the product at this stage as it moves through the production line.
Outbound logistics : Once the products have been manufactured they are ready to be distributed
to distribution centres, wholesalers, retailers or customers. Distribution of finished goods is
known as outbound logistics.
Marketing and Sales: Marketing must make sure that the product is targeted towards the correct
customer group. The marketing mix is used to establish an effective strategy, any competitive
advantage is clearly communicated to the target group through the promotional mix.
Services: After the product/service has been sold what support services does the organisation
offer customers?. This may come in the form of after sales training, guarantees and warranties.
With the above activities, any or a combination of them are essential if the firm are to develop
the "competitive advantage" which Porter talks about in his book.

Support Activities
Support activities assist the primary activities in helping the organisation achieve its competitive
advantage. They include:
Procurement: This department must source raw materials for the business and obtain the best
price for doing so. The challenge for procurement is to obtain the best possible quality available
(on the market) for their budget.
Technology development: The use of technology to obtain a competitive advantage is very

important in today’s technological driven environment. Technology can be used in many ways
including production to reduce cost thus add value, research and development to develop new
products and the internet so customers have 24/7 access to the firm.
Human resource management: The organisation will have to recruit, train and develop the
correct people for the organisation to be successful. Staff will have to be motivated and paid the
‘market rate’ if they are to stay with the organisation and add value. Within the service sector
such as the airline industry, employees are the competitive advantage as customers are
purchasing a service, which is provided by employees; there isn't a product for the customer to
take away with them.
Firm infrastructure: Every organisations needs to ensure that their finances, legal structure and
management structure work efficiently and helps drive the organisation forward. Inefficient
infrastructures waste resources, could affect the firm's reputation and even leave it open to fines
and sanctions.
Types of value chain
There are various types of value chain:
i) Simple value chain: The value chain describes the full range of activities which are required
to bring a product or service from conception, through the different phases of production
(involving a combination of physical transformation and the input of various producer services),
delivery to final consumers, and final disposal after use.
ii) Extended value chain: In the real world, of course, value chains are much more complex
than this. For one thing, there tend to be many more links in the chain. Take, for example, the
case of the furniture industry. This involves the provision of seed inputs, chemicals, equipment
and water for the forestry sector. Cut logs pass to the sawmill sector which gets its primary
inputs from the machinery sector. From there, sawn timber moves to the furniture manufacturers
who, in turn, obtain inputs from the machinery, adhesives and paint industries and also draw on
design and branding skills from the service sector. Depending on which market is served, the
furniture then passes through various intermediary stages until it reaches the final customer, who
after use, consigns the furniture for recycling.

iii) One or many value chains: In addition to the manifold links in a value chain, typically
intermediary producers in a particular value chain may feed into a number of different value
chains. In some cases, these alternative value chains may absorb only a small share of their
output; in other cases, there may be an equal spread of customers.
But the share of sales at a particular point in time may not capture the full story – the dynamics
of a particular market or technology may mean that a relatively small (or large)
customer/supplier may become a relatively large (small) customer/supplier in the future.
Furthermore the share of sales may obscure the crucial role that a particular supplier controlling
a key core technology or input (which may be a relatively small part of its output) has on the rest
of the value chain.
iv) One or many labels: There is a considerable overlap between the concept of a value chain
and similar concepts used in other contexts. One important source of confusion –particularly in
earlier years before the value chain as outlined above became increasingly widespread in the
research and policy domain – was one of nomenclature and arose from the work of Michael
Porter in the mid-1980s. Porter distinguished two important elements of modern value chain
analysis
 The various activities which were performed in particular links in the chain. Here he drew the
distinction between different stages of the process of supply (inbound logistics, operations,
outbound logistics, marketing and sales, and after sales service), the transformation of these
inputs into outputs (production, logistics, quality and continuous improvement processes),
and the support services the firm marshals to accomplish this task.
 He complements this discussion of intra-link functions with the concept of the multilinked
value chain itself, which he refers to as the value system. The value system basically extends
his idea of the value chain to inter-link linkages,
There are six main business functions of a value chain:

 Research and Development
 Design of Products, Services, or Processes
 Productions
 Marketing and Sales
 Distribution
 Customer Service
IMPORTANCE OF VALUE CHAIN ANALYSIS
There are three main sets of reasons why value chain analysis is important in this era of rapid
globalization. They are:

 With the growing division of labour and the global dispersion of the production of
components, systemic competitiveness has become increasingly important
 Efficiency in production is only a necessary condition for successfully penetrating global
markets. Value chain analysis helps in understanding the advantages and disadvantages of
firms and countries specializing in production rather than services.
 Entry into global markets which allows for sustained income growth – that is, making the
best of globalization - requires an understanding of dynamic factors within the whole value
chain; value chain analysis helps to explain the distribution of benefits, particularly income,
to those participating in the global economy. This makes it easier to identify the policies
which can be implemented to enable individual producers and countries to increase their
share of these gains. This is an especially topical issue at the turn of the millennium and has
captured the attention of a wide variety of parties.
JUST IN TIME (JIT)

This concept advocates zero inventory and stockless production through just-in-time purchasing
and just-in-time production. Organizations create a closer relationship with the suppliers and
arrange for more frequent deliveries of small quantities. The objective of just-in-time purchasing
is to purchase goods so that delivery is made immediately before their use.
JIT is considered economical since it eliminates the cost of carrying inventory and reduces the
inefficiencies that the inventories create. JIT purchasing increases the number of orders as the
enterprises order more frequently and in smaller quantities. Holding cost is reduced by a
significant proportion as it only arises due to waste and inefficiency created by inventory. It calls
for 100 per cent quality. Some of the major features of JIT include:
a) Frequent and reliable deliveries to avoid inventory buildup. Penalties are imposed on those
who do not meet the deadline.
b) Strategic location of firms. This may be closeness to suppliers and/or customers.
c) Improved communication between companies and suppliers through the use of computerized
purchasing systems that allows for online ordering.
d) Single sourcing and building long-term relations with a few trusted suppliers.
e) Increased supplier involvement in the design aspects of a product to ensure that they meet
the company’s quality requirements.
f) Maintenance of strict quality control by all parties. Suppliers guarantee the quality of stock
items.
Objectives of JIT /Advantage
The benefits include lower inventory level, emphasis on strict quality control by all parties, faster
market response, smaller manufacturing facilities and lower set up costs.
1. Set up times is significantly reduced in the factory.Cutting down the set up time to be more
productive will allow the company to improve their bottom line to look more efficient and focus

time spent on other areas that may need improvement. This allows the reduction or elimination
of the inventory held to cover the “changeover” time.
2. The flows of goods from warehouse to shelves are improved.Having employees focused on
specific areas of the system will allow them to process goods faster instead of having them
vulnerable to fatigue from doing too many jobs at once and simplifies the tasks at hand. Small or
individual piece lot sizes reduce lot delay inventories which simplifies inventory flow and its
management.
3. Employees who possess multiple skills are utilized more efficiently.Having employees
trained to work on different parts of the inventory cycle system will allow companies to use
workers in situations where they are needed when there is a shortage of workers and a high
demand for a particular product.
4. Better consistency of scheduling and consistency of employee work hours.If there is no
demand for a product at the time, workers don’t have to be working. This can save the company
money by not having to pay workers for a job not completed or could have them focus on other
jobs around the warehouse that would not necessarily be done on a normal day.
5. Increased emphasis on supplier relationships.No company wants a break in their inventory
system that would create a shortage of supplies while not having inventory sit on shelves. Having
a trusting supplier relationship means that you can rely on goods being there when you need
them in order to satisfy the company and keep the company name in good standing with the
public.
6. Supplies continue around the clock keeping workers productive and businesses focused
on turnover.Having management focused on meeting deadlines will make employeeswork hard
to meet the company goals to see benefits in terms of job satisfaction,promotion or even higher
pay.
Disadvantages of JIT
1) High ordering cost due to high orders
2) There are chances of stock outs in case of failure on the side as the supplier
USE OF COMPUTERS IN COSTING

A computer is a set of electronic device that can systematically and sequentially follow a set of
instructions called a program to perform high-speed arithmetic and logical operations on data.
Because of the rapid changes in finances and its related fields, accurate record keeping is critical.
Computerizing a business’ tasks of accounting procedures, increases efficiency. With a computer
and its appropriate software, one can request and receive an in house balance sheet, an income
statement, cash flow and statements of affairs and other accounting reports within a short time:
hence an increase in productivity.
Let’s take time to briefly see the role computers are playing in the field of accounting, changing
some of the things that were manually done and facilitating accounting data processing.

General Ledger
Electronic General Ledgers are labor saving device for the preparation of financial statements
and for establishing multiple income and cost entries. It takes charge of secondary postings.
Inventory Control
Electronic Inventory Control module has multiple functions, which includes tracking inventory
for both costing and tax purposes, aid managers in controlling purchasing (and the overall level
of expenditure) and minimizing the investment in inventory (and subsequent loss of cash flow).
It is integrated with the general ledger so it can automatically set aside the correct amount for
processing further.
Many shops now use stock control systems. The term "stock control system" can be used to
include various aspects of controlling the amount of stock on the shelves and in the stockroom
and how reordering happens.
Typical features include:
 Ensuring that products are on the shelf in shops in just the right quantity.
 Recognizing when a customer has bought a product.
 Automatically signaling when more products need to be put on the shelf from the
stockroom.
 Automatically reordering stock at the appropriate time from the main warehouse.
 Automatically producing management information reports that could be used both by
local managers and at Head office.
These might detail what has sold, how quickly and at what price, for example. Reports could be
used to predict when to stock up on extra products, for example, at Christmas or to make
decisions about special offers, discontinuing products and so on. Sending reordering information
not only to the warehouse but also directly to the factory producing the products to enable them
to optimize production.
Computer Aided Manufacturing (CAM)

Today, increasing competition level in the markets require using CAM systems that enable firms
to manufacture quality products for customer demands in a short time. Using CAM systems in
manufacturing processes has brought about important changes in firms’ performance
measurement systems.
Spreadsheets
Electronic Spreadsheets allow you to do anything that you would normally do with a calculator,
pencil and columnar scratch pad. A typical integrated double entry accounting spreadsheet
system will contain some of the following components: general ledger, inventory levels, order
entry, payroll, time, and billing etc...

Job Order Costing System
A job order costing system is utilized by businesses that manufacture products for specific
orders. It is employed in circumstances where a business wants to know the expenses associated
with manufacturing different jobs, products, or services for a given period. By using this system
to determine the costs of expenses, the expenses are tracked to the activity (job) and then the
expenses of performing the activity are split-up by the unit numbers of the activity to succeed in
determining the cost per-unit average of the product. The costs of producing each job in a job
order costing system must be captured and tracked in order to determine the accurate cost of
producing the specific product. Some costs for a business that would be associated with this may
include materials, labor, and overhead related to producing a product. However, materials labor
and overhead will differ from specific product and specific customer order to the next.
Personalized production that is specific to a customer want or job order need which may involve
greater encouragement from our resources than that of the common productivity movement
within the business would be an example of a particular customer or job order.
INVENTORY MANAGEMENT
Inventory management software is a computer-based system for tracking inventory levels,
orders, sales and deliveries. It can also be used in the manufacturing industry to create a work
order, bill of materials and other production-related documents. Companies use inventory
management software to avoid product overstock and outages. It is a tool for organizing
inventory data that before was generally stored in hard-copy form or in spreadsheets. It is often
associated with and is similar to distribution software.
The Uses of Computers in Inventory Control

Computerization has revolutionized inventory management, as technologies ranging from
automatic scanners to radio frequency identification chips now allow businesses to track their
inventory from the moment a company buys it wholesale to the moment the products leave the
building in the hands of a customer.
Receipt of Goods
A retail store or a central warehouse uses bar code or radio-frequency identification scanning at
the point of receipt of goods. Scanning individual items or shipment pallets allows a company to
itemize all shipments from the supplier, which can be compared against the purchase order for
errors or losses in transit. When yourbusiness ships these goods out of the warehouse to their
point of sale, a second scan can automatically tally the remaining stock in the warehouse, and
send messages to the purchasing managers indicating that it is time to reorder.

Retail Turnover
Many businesses use similar scanning techniques at the point of checkout. As of 2010, bar code
scanners are more popular than RFID for this purpose. Both will automatically enter the correct
price at the register and prevent data entry errors. They also can create a perfect real-time record
of how much stock remains on the shelves, how much is available in on-site storage, and whether
a new shipment is necessary from the warehouse. Combine this information with warehousing
data, and your business can create additional alerts to key management when a bottleneck occurs.
For example, if a dozen retail stores anticipate needing restocking, but the warehouse does not
have sufficient goods on hand, your business can place a rush order to fill the need.
Stock Management and Cost Reduction

The process of moving goods through a company pipeline is always economically inefficient.
The purchase of the goods represents an investment of company capital, which your business
cannot recoup until you sell your inventory. Warehousing of goods before sale introduces the
possibility of inventory shrinkage in value from theft, damage, deterioration or changes in
customer taste. Moving goods from warehouses to the point of sale involves shipping costs,
especially if the shipment is incorrect, or if the internal shipping process is inefficient.
Computerization provides a real-time picture of this entire work flow process, and allows
managers to reduce purchasing costs through minimizing inventory, increase the efficiency of
internal shipping systems, and reduce the possibility of theft or damage by being able to track
each item down to the individual staffer who takes responsibility for it.
Cost centre analysis

Conducting cost and revenue analyses involves using a spreadsheet-based software tool to help
develop a baseline of programmatic and financial data for your facility. The tool’s completed
spreadsheets provide a picture of current situation and help identify needed changes to increase a
program’s cost efficiency and revenue generation. The tool is also useful for exploring the
possible impact of making changes, such as:
 Changing standard practices;
 Adding new services or facilities;
 Using some services or facilities to subsidize others.
BUDGETING AND DECISION MAKING
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS (DSS)

DSS are alternatively termed end-user computing systems. Their objective is to support
managers in their work, especially decision making.
DSS tend to be used in planning, modeling, analyzing alternatives and decision making. They
generally operate through terminals operated by the user who interacts with the computer system.

Using a variety of tools and procedures the "manager (i.e. the user) can develop his own systems
to help perform his functions more effectively. It is this active involvement and the focus on
decision making which distinguishes a DSS from a data processing system. The emphasis is on
support for decision making not on automated decision making which is a feature of transaction
processing.
DSS are especially useful for semi-structured problems where problem sol ' is improved by
interaction between the manager and the computer system Tkgemphasis is on small, simple
models which can easily be understood and used h the manager rather than complex integrated
systems which need informal specialists to operate them.
The main characteristics of DSS are:

a) The computer provides support but does not replace the manager's judgement nor does it
provide predetermined solutions.
b) DSS are best suited to semi-structured problems where parts of the analysis can be
computerized but the decision maker's judgement and insight is needed to control the
process.
c) Where effective problem solving is enhanced by interaction between the computer and the
manager.

TOPIC 11
OVERVIEW OF PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT
Introduction
Performance measurement and target-setting are important to the growth process. While many
small businesses can run themselves quite comfortably without much formal measurement or
target-setting, for growing businesses the control these processes offer can be indispensable.
The benefits of performance measurement
Knowing how the different areas of your business are performing is valuable information in its
own right, but a good measurement system will also let you examine the triggers for any changes
in performance. This puts you in a better position to manage your performance proactively.
One of the key challenges with performance management is selecting what to measure. The
priority here is to focus on quantifiable factors that are clearly linked to the drivers of success in
your business and your sector. These are known as key performance indicators (KPIs). See the
page in this guide on deciding what to measure.
Bear in mind that quantifiable isn't the same as financial. While financial measures of
performance are among the most widely used by businesses, nonfinancial measures can be just
as important.
For example, if your business succeeds or fails on the quality of its customer service, then that's
what you need to measure - through, for example, the number of complaints received. For more
information about financial measurement, see the page in this guide on measurement of your
financial performance.
The benefits of target-setting
If you've identified the key areas that drive your business performance and found a way to
measure them, then a natural next step is to start setting performance targets to give everyone in
your business a clear sense of what they should be aiming for.
Strategic visions can be difficult to communicate, but by breaking your top level objectives down
into smaller concrete targets you'll make it easier to manage the process of delivering them. In
this way, targets form a crucial link between strategy and day-to-day operations.

FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE MEASURES
Financial performance exists at different levels of the organisation. This page is mostly
concerned with measuring the financial performance of the organisation as a whole, and of
measuring the performance of key projects. Furtehr measures are used as part of the particualr
problem of divisional performance appraisal.
Traditionally, financial performance measures are split into the following categories:
 Profitability
 Liquidity / working capital
 Gearing
 Investor ratios
Profitability measures
Return on capital employed (ROCE)
ROCE is a key measure of profitability. It shows the net profit that is generated from every $1
of assets employed.
 ROCE is sometimes calculated using PBIT instead of net profit. Use whichever figure is
given in the exam.
 Capital employed = total assets less current liabilities or total equity plus long-term debt.
 Capital employed may be based on net book value (NBV), gross book value or
replacement cost. (note to students: Use whichever figure is given in the exam.

An increase in ROCE could be achieved by:
 Increasing net profit, e.g. through an increase in sales price or through better control of
costs.
 Reducing capital employed, e.g. through the repayment of long term debt.
The ROCE can be understood further by calculating the net profit margin and the asset turnover:
ROCE = net profit margin × asset turnover
Gross profit margin
This is the gross profit as a percentage of turnover.
A high gross profit margin is desirable. It indicates that either sales prices are high or that
production costs are being kept well under control.
Net profit margin
This is the net profit (turnover less all expenses) as a percentage of turnover.

A high net profit margin is desirable. It indicates that either sales prices are high or that all costs
are being kept well under control.
Asset turnover
This is the turnover divided by the capital employed. The asset turnover shows the turnover that
is generated from each $1 of assets employed.
A high asset turnover is desirable. An increase in the asset turnover could be achieved by:
 Increasing turnover, e.g. through the launch of new products or a successful advertising
campaign.
 Reducing capital employed, e.g. through the repayment of long term debt.
EBITDA
EBITDA is:
 earnings before interest, tax and depreciation adjustment or

 earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation.
The two versions are entirely interchangeable.

Liquidity measures
The main reason why companies fail is poor cash management rather than profitability so it is
vital that liquidity is managed.
A company can be profitable but at the same time encounter cash flow problems. Liquidity and
working capital ratios give some indication of the company's liquidity.
Current ratio
This is the current assets divided by the current liabilities.
The ratio measures the company's ability to meet its short term liabilities as they fall due.
A ratio in excess of 1 is desirable but the expected ratio varies between the type of industry.
A decrease in the ratio year on year or a figure that is below the industry average could indicate
that the company has liquidity problems.The company should take steps to improve liquidity,
e.g. by paying creditors as they fall due or by better management of receivables in order to
reduce the level of bad debts.

Quick ratio (acid test)
This is a similar to the current ratio but inventory is removed from the current assets due to its
poor liquidity in the short term.
The comments are the same as for the current ratio.
Inventory holding period
This indicates the average number of days that inventory items are held for.
An increase in the inventory holding period could indicate that the company is having problems
selling its products and could also indicate that there is an increased level of obsolete stock. The
company should take steps to increase stock turnover, e.g. by removing any slow moving or
unpopular items of stock and by getting rid of any obsolete stock.
A decrease in the inventory holding period could be desirable as the company's ability to turn
over inventory has improved and the company does not have excess cash tied up in inventory.
However, any reductions should be reviewed further as the company may be struggling to
manage its liquidity and may not have the cash available to hold the optimum level of inventory.
Receivables (debtor) collection period
This is the average period it takes for a company's credit customers / debtors / receivables to pay
what they owe.
An increase in the receivables collection period could indicate that the company is struggling to
manage its debts. Possible steps to reduce the ratio include:
 Credit checks on customers to ensure that they will pay on time

 Improved credit control, e.g. invoicing on time, chasing up bad debts.

A decrease in the receivables collection period may indicate that the company's has improved its
management of receivables. However, a receivables collection period well below the industry
average may make the company uncompetitive and profitability could be impacted as a result.
Payables (creditor) period
This is the average period it takes for a company to pay for its purchases.
An increase in the company's payables period could indicate that the company is struggling to
pay its debts as they fall due. However, it could simply indicate that the company is taking better
advantage of any credit period offered to them.
A decrease in the company's payables period could indicate that the company's ability to pay for
its purchases on time is improving.However, the company should not pay for its purchases too
early since supplier credit is a useful source of finance.
Gearing ratios
In addition to managing profitability and liquidity it is also important for a company to manage
its financial risk. The following ratios may be calculated:
Financial gearing
This is the long term debt as a percentage of equity.
A high level of gearing indicates that the company relies heavily on debt to finance its long term
needs. This increases the level of risk for the business since interest and capital repayments must
be made on debt, where as there is no obligation to make payments to equity.
The ratio could be improved by reducing the level of long term debt and raising long term
finance using equity.

Interest cover
This is the operating profit (profit before finance charges and tax) divided by the finance cost.
A decrease in the interest cover indicates that the company is facing an increased risk of not
being able to meet its finance payments as they fall due.
The ratio could be improved by taking steps to increase the operating profit, e.g. through better
management of costs, or by reducing finance costs through reducing the level of debt.
Other investor ratios
Investors will be interested in all of the above measures, along with the following:
Earnings Per Share (EPS)
EPS is a measure of the profit attributable to each ordinary share.
For EPS to be truly meaningful, it must be set in context.
 Is EPS growing or declining over time?

 Is there likely to be significant dilution of EPS?
 Is it calculated consistently?

Dividend cover
This is the net profit divided by the dividend.
A decrease in the dividend cover indicates that the company is facing an increased risk of not
being able to make its dividend payments to shareholders
Dividend yield
 Dividend yield = (Dividend per share/Current share price) × 100%
This is one way of measuring the return to shareholders but ignores any capital growth / loss.
Earnings yield
Earnings yield = (EPS/Share price) × 100%
This is another one way of measuring the return to shareholders but, as with dividend yield,
ignores any capital growth / loss.
Shareholder value
As discussed above, profit based measures have a poor correlation with shareholder value.
Measures that have a closer correlation include the following:

 Discounted cash flow based approaches such as NPV, IRR and MIRR
 Economic value added (EVA)
NON-FINANCIAL MEASURES OF PERFORMANCE
Non-Financial Performance Indicators (NFPIs) and business performance
Introduction
There are a number of areas that are particularly important for ensuring the success of a business
and where the use of NFPIs plays a key role. These include:
 the management of human resources

 product and service quality
 brand awareness and company profile.
The management of human resources
Traditionally the main performance measure for staff was cost (a FPI). However, businesses
have started to view staff as a major asset and recognise that it is important to attract, motivate
and retain highly qualified and experienced staff.
As a result, NFPIs are now also used to monitor and control staff. These can include the
following:
 staff turnover
 absentee rates / sick days
 % of job offers accepted
 results of job satisfaction surveys
 competence surveys
Product and service quality
Problems with product or service quality can have a long-term impact on the business and they
can lead to customer dissatisfaction and loss of future sales.
A product (or service) and its components should be critically and objectively compared both
with competition and with customer expectation and needs, for example:
 Is it good value?
 Can it really deliver superior performance?
 How does it compare with competitor offerings?
 How will it compare with competitor offerings in the future given competitive
innovations?

Product and service quality are usually based on several critical dimensions that should be
identified and measured over time. Performance on all these dimensions needs to be combined to
give a complete picture. For example:
 an automobile firm can have measures of defects, ability to perform to specifications,

durability and ability to repair
 a bank might be concerned with waiting time, accuracy of transactions, and making the
customer experience friendly and positive
 a computer manufacturer can examine relative performance specifications, and product
reliability as reflected by repair data.
Brand awareness and company profile
Developing and maintaining a brand and/or a company profile can be expensive. However, it can
also enhance performance. The value of a brand/company profile is based on the extent to which
it has:
 high loyalty
 name awareness
 perceived quality
 other attributes such as patents or trademarks.
NFPIs may focus on areas such as customer awareness and consumer opinions.
Difficulties in using and interpreting qualitative information
Particularly at higher levels of management, non-financial information is often not in numerical

terms, but qualitative, or soft, rather than quantitative. Qualitative information often represents
opinions of individuals and user groups. However there are issues related to its use.
 Decisions often appear to have been made on the basis of quantitative information;
however qualitative considerations often influence the final choice, even if this is not
explicit.
 Conventional information systems are usually designed to carry quantitative information
and are sometimes less able to convey qualitative issues. However the impact of a
decreased output requirement on staff morale is something that may be critical but it is
not something that an information system would automatically report.
 In both decision making and control, managers should be aware that an information
system may provide a limited or distorted picture of what is actually happening. In many
situations, sensitivity has to be used in interpreting the output of an information system.
 Information in the form of opinions is difficult to measure and interpret. It also requires
more analysis.
 Qualitative information may be incomplete.
 Qualitative aspects are often interdependent and it can be difficult to separate the impact
of different factors.

 Evaluating qualitative information is subjective, as it is not in terms of numbers - there
are no objective formulae as there are with financial measures.
 The cost of collecting and improving qualitative information may be very high.
 Difficulties in measurement and interpretation mean that qualitative factors are often
ignored.
Models for evaluating financial and non-financial performance
As discussed, it is important that a business appraises both financial and non-financial

performance. There are four key tools available:
 balanced scorecard
 The performance pyramid
 Fitzgerald and Moon's building block model
 The performance prism
The benefits of these models are as follows:
 financial and non-financial performance measures are included

 they are linked in to corporate strategy
 include external as well as internal measures
 include all important factors regardless of how easy they are to measure
 show clearly the tradeoffs between different dimensions of performance
 show how measures will motivate managers and employees.
BALANCED SCORECARD
A balance Scorecard is an integrated set of performance measures derived from the company’s
strategies that gives the top management a fast but comprehensive view of the organizational
unit. (i.e. a division or a strategic business unit (S.B.U)
The balanced scorecard philosophy assumes that an organizations vision and strategy is best
achieved when the organization is viewed from the following four perspectives.
1) Customer perspectives (How customers do see us?)
This gives rise to targets that matter to customer’s perspectives.
2) Internal business process (What must we excel in?)
This aims to improve internal processes and decision making quality control.
3) Learning and growth perspective (Can we continue to improve and create value?
This considers an organization’s capacity to maintain its competitive position through
acquisition of new skills.
4) Financial perspective (How do we look to shareholders?)
This covers traditional measures such as profitability, R. O. I etc.

Financial
To succeed financially, how should

we appear to shareholders.
Internal business process
Customer Vision and

To satisfy our shareholders
strategy
To achieve our vision & customers, what
how should we appear to business process must we
our customers? excel at?
Learning & growth
To achieve our vision, how will

we sustain our ability to change
& improve?
By implementing the balanced scorecard, the major objectives for each of the four perspectives
should be articulated.
These objectives should be translated into specific performance measures and targets for
achievements.
This method integrates traditional financial measures with operations, customer and staff issues
vital in long run competitiveness.
Illustration
ABC Ltd has in the past produced just one fairly successful product. Recently, however, a new
version of this product has been launched .Development work continues to add a related product
to the product list. Given below are some details of the activities during the months of November
2009

Units produced Existing product - 25,000units
New product - 5,000units
Cost of units produced Existing product = Sh. 375,000
New product = Sh. 70,000
Sales revenue Existing product - Sh. 550,000
New product = Sh. 125,000
Hours worked Existing product = 5,000 hrs

New product = 1,250 hrs
Development cost Sh. 47,000
Required:-
Suggest and calculate performance indicators that could be calculated for each of the four
perspectives on the balanced scored card.
1)Customer perspective
,
Percentage of sales by new products = ×100 = 18.5%
, ,
2) Internal business perspective

i) Productivity:
,
Existing product = = 5hours per unit
,
New product = = 4hours per unit
ii) Unit cost:

,
Existing product = = sh. 15 per unit
,
3) Financial perspectives
, ,
Gross profit; Existing product = ×100 =32%
,
, ,
New product = ×100= 44%
,
4)Learning curve and growth perspective
,
Development costs as a percentage of sales = × 100 = 7%
,

Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Management System
1) Clarifying and translating vision and strategy into specific strategic objectives and
identifying the critical drives of the strategic objectives.
2) Communicating & linking strategic objectives &measures.

Once employees understand the high level objectives and measures, they should establish
local objectives that support the business unit’s global strategy.
3) Plan, set targets & align strategic initiatives. Such targets should be over a 3 – 5 year period
broken down on a yearly basis so that progression targets can be set for assessing the
progress being made towards achieving the long term targets.
4) Enhancing strategic feedback and learning so that managers can monitor and adjust the
implementation of their strategy and if necessary make fundamental changes to the strategy
itself.
Benefits of Balanced Scorecard

1) It brings together in a single report four different perspectives on a company’s performance
that relate to many of the dispersed elements of the company’s competitive agenda such as
becoming customer oriented, shortening response time, improving quality, emphasizing team
work, reducing new product launch times and managing for the long term.
2) It provides a comprehensive framework for translating a company’s strategic goals into a
coherent set of performance measures by developing the major goals for the four
perspectives and translating these goals into specific performance measures.
3) It helps managers to consider all the important operational measures together i.e. to enables
mangers see whether improvements in one area may have been at the expense of another.
4) It improves communication within the organization and promotes the active formulation and
implementation of organizational strategy by making it highly visible through the linkage
performance measures to business unit strategy.
Limitations of Balanced Scorecard

1) The assumption of the course and effect is too ambitious and lack a theoretical underpinning
r empirical support.
The empirical studies undertaken have failed to provide evidence on the underlying linkages
between non-financial data and future financial performance.
2) There is an omission of important perspective most notable being the environmental impact
on society perspective and an employee perspective. There is nothing to prevent companies
adding additional perspectives to meet their own requirements but they must avoid the
temptation of creating too many perspectives and performance measures as a major benefit of
performance measure is the consciousness and clarity of presentation.

Management Accounting

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Management Accounting

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Management Accounting

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What are the main topics covered in the document?

What are the main topics covered in the document?

What are some of the benefits of using a balanced scorecard?

What are some of the benefits of using a balanced scorecard?

MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING

www.someakenya.com Contact: 0707 737 890 Page 1

A candidate who passes this paper should be able to:

- Estimate the cost of goods and services

1. Nature and purpose of cost and management accounting

- The nature of cost accounting and costing terms

- Definition and purpose of cost classification

- Meaning of cost estimation

www.someakenya.com Contact: 0707 737 890 Page 2

- The flow of costs in a business enterprise

- Job order costing

7. Marginal and absorption costing.

- Distinction between marginal and absorption costing

8. Budgeting and budgetary control

- Nature and purposes of budgets

10. Cost management

- Value chain-research and development-design-production-marketing distribution and customer

www.someakenya.com Contact: 0707 737 890 Page 3

11. Overview of Performance Measurement

- Purpose of performance measurements

12. Emerging issues and trends

Topic 1: Nature and purpose of cost and management accounting……………………..…….5

Revised on: June 2016

www.someakenya.com Contact: 0707 737 890 Page 4

NATURE AND PURPOSE OF COST AND ACCOUNTING

THE NATURE OF COST ACCOUNTING AND MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING

1. Cost accounting is a branch of knowledge: Though considered as a branch of

2. Cost accounting is a science: Cost accounting is a science as it is a body of systematic

www.someakenya.com Contact: 0707 737 890 Page 5

Development of Cost Accounting

Types of Cost Accounting

Standard Cost Accounting

Activity Based Costing

www.someakenya.com Contact: 0707 737 890 Page 6

Lean accounting is an extension of the philosophy of lean manufacturing and

www.someakenya.com Contact: 0707 737 890 Page 7

a) Accounting for costs

b) Planning and budgeting

c) Control of operations of the enterprise

e) Resource allocation decisions

THE PURPOSES OF COST ACCOUNTING INFORMATION

www.someakenya.com Contact: 0707 737 890 Page 8

Planning is an important function of management accounting which is most effectively

Budgets quantify the financial targets to be achieved by the management of an organization.

Management accounting facilitates the provision of financial information to management for

3. Monitoring & Control

Management accounting lays great emphasis on accountability through effective performance

www.someakenya.com Contact: 0707 737 890 Page 9

1. Cost Accounting Department and Production Department:

As per cost estimates, production department makes timely arrangement of material,

In a competitive world for facing competition effectively, reducing cost of production is a

2. Cost Accounting Department and Purchases Department:

Purchase department is to ensure that right type of material is purchased at a reasonably

www.someakenya.com Contact: 0707 737 890 Page 10

Personnel Department concerned with proper recruitment, selection, training labour

4. Cost Accounting Department and Finance & Accounts Department: