0% found this document useful (0 votes)
62 views24 pages

Simplified CSSM 2014

The document discusses critical-state soil mechanics (CSSM), which describes mechanical soil response using an effective stress framework. CSSM ties together concepts of one-dimensional consolidation curves and shear stress-normal stress behavior from direct shear tests. The basic form of CSSM involves 3 material constants (friction angle, compression and swelling indices) and the initial state parameter. CSSM has been incorporated into several constitutive models used in finite element analysis. However, it is still missing from many soil mechanics textbooks and curricula.

Uploaded by

Anonymous BuFjdL
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
62 views24 pages

Simplified CSSM 2014

The document discusses critical-state soil mechanics (CSSM), which describes mechanical soil response using an effective stress framework. CSSM ties together concepts of one-dimensional consolidation curves and shear stress-normal stress behavior from direct shear tests. The basic form of CSSM involves 3 material constants (friction angle, compression and swelling indices) and the initial state parameter. CSSM has been incorporated into several constitutive models used in finite element analysis. However, it is still missing from many soil mechanics textbooks and curricula.

Uploaded by

Anonymous BuFjdL
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 24

7/4/2020

Simplified
Critical-State Soil Mechanics

Paul W. Mayne
Georgia Institute of Technology

PROLOGUE
 Critical-state soil mechanics is an effective
stress framework describing mechanical soil
response
 In its simple form here, we consider only
shear loading and compression-swelling.
 We merely tie together two well-known
concepts: (1) one-dimensional consolidation
σv’ curves); and (2) shear
behavior (via e-logσ
stress-vs. normal stress (ττ−σv’) plots from
direct shear (alias Mohr’s circles).

1
7/4/2020

Critical State Soil Mechanics (CSSM)


 Experimental evidence
 1936 by Hvorslev (1960, ASCE)
 Henkel (1960, ASCE Boulder)
 Parry (1961)
 Kulhawy & Mayne (1990): Summary of 200+ soils
 Mathematics presented elsewhere
 Schofield & Wroth (1968)
 Roscoe & Burland (1968)
 Wood (1990)
 Jefferies & Been (2006)
 Basic form: 3 material constants (φ φ', Cc, Cs)
plus initial state parameter (e0, σvo', OCR)

Critical State Soil Mechanics (CSSM)


 Constitutive Models in FEM packages:
 Original Cam-Clay (1968)
 Modified Cam Clay (1969)
 NorSand (Jefferies 1993)
 Bounding Surface (Dafalias)
 MIT-E3 (Whittle, 1993)
 MIT-S1 (Pestana, 1999; 2001)
 Cap Model
 “Ber-Klay” (Univ. California)
 others (Adachi, Oka, Ohta, Dafalias, Nova, Wood, Huerkel)
 "Undrained" is just one specific stress path
 Yet !!! CSSM is missing from most textbooks and
undergrad & grad curricula.

2
7/4/2020

One-Dimensional Consolidation
Sandy Clay (CL), Surry, VA: Depth = 27 m
1.0
σvo'=300 kPa
σp'=900 kPa
0.9
Cr = 0.04
Void Ratio, e

0.8 Overconsolidation Ratio, OCR = 3


Cs = swelling index (= Cr)
0.7 cv = coef. of consolidation
D' = constrained modulus
Cαe = coef. secondary compression
0.6
k ≈ hydraulic conductivity
Cc = 0.38
0.5
1 10 100 1000 10000

Effective Vertical Stress, σ v’ (kPa)


svo'

Direct Shear Test Results


Slow Direct Shear Tests on Triassic Clay,NC Slow Direct Shear Tests on Triassic Clay, Raleigh, NC
140 140
σn' Strength Parameters:
(kPa)
Shear Stress, τ (kPa)

φ ' = 26.1 o
120 120
(kPa)= c' = 0;
Peak
214.5
100 100
τ

80 80
Shear Stress,

Peak

60 135.0 60
0.491 = tan φ '
40 40
Peak
20 45.1 20

0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 50 100 150 200 250

Displacement, δ (mm) Effective Normal Stress, σn' (kPa)

τ τ σv’ τ τ σv’
δ

γs

Direct Shear Box (DSB) Direct Simple Shear (DSS)

3
7/4/2020

CSSM for Dummies


CC

Void Ratio, e
Void Ratio, e
σCSL’ ≈ ½σ
σNC’
e0 NC NC

CSL CSL

σCSL’ σNC’ Log σv' Effective stress σv'


CSL

Shear stress τ
tanφ'
CSSM Premise:
“All stress paths fail
on the critical state
line (CSL)” φ′
c′=0
Effective stress σv'

CSSM for Dummies


CC
Void Ratio, e

Void Ratio, e

e0
∆e NC
NC
ef
CSL CSL

σvo′
Log σv' Effective stress σv'
CSL
τmax = c′′ + σ′ tanφ
φ′
Shear stress τ

φ'
tanφ
STRESS PATH No.1
NC Drained Soil
Given: e0, σvo’, NC (OCR=1)
Drained Path: ∆u = 0
Volume Change is Contractive: c’=0
σvo′
εvol = ∆e/(1+e0) < 0
Effective stress σv'

4
7/4/2020

CSSM for Dummies


Void Ratio, e CC

Void Ratio, e
e0
NC
NC
CSL
CSL
σvf′ σvo′ Effective stress σv'
Log σv' CSL
φ'

Shear stress τ
tanφ
STRESS PATH No.2
NC Undrained Soil ∆u
τmax = cu=su
Given: e0, σvo’, NC (OCR=1)
Undrained Path: ∆V/V0 = 0
∆u = Positive Excess
+∆ σvf′
Porewater Pressures σvo′
Effective stress σv'

CSSM for Dummies


CC
Void Ratio, e
Void Ratio, e

NC NC

CSL CSL

Log σv' Effective stress σv'


CSL
Shear stress τ

φ'
tanφ
Note: All NC undrained
stress paths are parallel
to each other, thus:
σvo’ = constant
su/σ
σvo’NC = ½sinφ
DSS: su/σ φ’
Effective stress σv'

10

5
7/4/2020

CSSM for Dummies


Void Ratio, e CC

Void Ratio, e
CS OC
NC NC

CSL CSL

Effective stress σv'


Log σv' σ p'
CSL

Shear stress τ
Overconsolidated States: φ'
tanφ
e0, σvo’, and OCR = σp’/σ
σvo’
where σp’ = σvmax’ = Pc’ =
preconsolidation stress;
OCR = overconsolidation ratio
Effective stress σv' σ p'
11

CSSM for Dummies


CC
Void Ratio, e
Void Ratio, e

e0
OC
CS NC
NC

CSL CSL

σvo' σvf' Log σv' Effective stress σv'


CSL
Shear stress τ

Stress Path No. 3 φ'


tanφ
Undrained OC Soil: ∆u
e0, σvo’, and OCR
Stress Path: ∆V/V0 = 0
Negative Excess ∆u
σvo' Effective stress σv'

12

6
7/4/2020

CSSM for Dummies


CC

Void Ratio, e
Void Ratio, e

e0
OC
CS NC
NC

CSL CSL

σvo' Log σv' Effective stress σv'


CSL

Shear stress τ
Stress Path No. 4 φ'
tanφ
Drained OC Soil:
e0, σvo’, and OCR
Stress Path: ∆u = 0
Dilatancy: ∆V/V0 > 0
σvo' Effective stress σv'

13

Critical state soil mechanics


• Initial state: e0, σvo’, and OCR = σp’/σvo’
• Soil constants: φ’, Cc, and Cs (Λ = 1-Cs/Cc)
• For NC soil (OCR =1):
 Undrained (εvol = 0): +∆u and τmax = su = cu
 Drained (∆u = 0) and contractive (decrease εvol)

• For OC soil:
 Undrained (εvol = 0): -∆u and τmax = su = cu
 Drained (∆u = 0) and dilative (Increase εvol)

There’s more ! Semi-drained, Partly undrained, Cyclic response…..

14

7
7/4/2020

Equivalent Stress Concept


CC

Void Ratio, e
NC
Void Ratio, e

e0
OC NC
∆e CS
σp' σp'
ep

CSL CSL

σvo' σvf' σe' Log σv' Effective stress σv'

1. OC State (eo, σvo’, σp’) CSL

Shear stress τ
2. Project OC state to NC φ'
tanφ

line for equivalent stress, σe’ su


∆e = Cs log(σp’/σvo’) at σe’
∆e = Cc log(σe’/σp’) suOC = suNC
3. σe’ = σvo’ OCR[1-Cs/Cc] σvo' σ e' Stress σv'

15

Critical state soil mechanics


• Previously: su/σvo’ = constant for NC soil
• On the virgin compression line: σvo’ = σe’
• Thus: su/σe’ = constant for all soil (NC & OC)
• For simple shear: su/σe’ = ½sin φ’
• Equivalent stress: σe’ = σvo’ OCR[1-Cs/Cc]

Normalized Undrained Shear Strength:

φ’ OCRΛ
σvo’ = ½ sinφ
su/σ

where Λ = (1-Cs/Cc)

16

8
7/4/2020

Undrained Shear Strength from CSSM


0.4
AGS Plastic
Amherst
Ariake
Bootlegger
su/σvo' NC (DSS)

0.3 Bothkennar
Boston Blue
Cowden
Hackensack
0.2 James Bay
Mexico City
Onsoy
Porto Tolle
Portsmouth
0.1 Rissa

σvo'NC (DSS) =½sinφ'


San Francisco
Silty Holocene
su/σ
Wroth (1984)
0.0
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
φ'
sinφ

17

Undrained Shear Strength from CSSM

10 Amherst CVVC
σvo'

Atchafalaya
DSS Undrained Strength, su/σ

Bangkok
Bootlegger Cove
Λ Boston Blue
φ' = 40o Cowden
Intact
30o Drammen
Clays
20o
Hackensack
Haga
1 Lower Chek Lok
Maine
McManus
Paria

φ' OCRΛ
Portland
σvo' = ½ sinφ
su/σ Portsmouth
Silty Holocene
Note: Λ = 1 - Cs/Cc ≈ 0.8 Upper Chek Lok
0.1 40
30
1 10 100 20
Overconsolidation Ratio, OCR

18

9
7/4/2020

Porewater Pressure Response from CSSM


1 Amherst CVVC
∆us/σ φ'OCRΛ
σvo' = 1 - ½cosφ Atchafalaya
Bangkok
σvo'

0
Bootlegger Cove
Normalized Porewater, ∆u/σ

Boston Blue
-1 Cowden
Drammen
Hackensack
-2
Haga
Lower Chek Lok
-3 Maine
Intact McManus
Clays Paria
-4
Portland
φ' = 20o 30o 40o Portsmouth
-5 Silty Holocene
Upper Chek Lok
Λ = 0.9 0.8 0.7
20
-6
30
1 10 100
40
Overconsolidation Ratio, OCR

19

Yield Surfaces
NC NC
CSL
Void Ratio, e

OC
Void Ratio, e

OC

σp'

CSL

σp' Normal stress σv'


Log σv'
CSL
Shear stress τ

 Yield surface represents


3-d preconsolidation

 Quasi-elastic behavior
within the yield surface

Normal stress σv'

20

10
7/4/2020

Critical state soil mechanics


• This powerpoint: geosystems.ce.gatech.edu
• Classic book: Critical -State Soil Mechanics by
Schofield & Wroth (1968):
http://www.geotechnique.info

• Schofield (2005) Disturbed Soil Properties and


Geotechnical Design Thomas Telford
• Wood (1990): Soil Behaviour and CSSM
• Jefferies & Been (2006): Soil liquefaction: a
critical-state approach www.informaworld.com

21

ESA versus TSA


• Effective stress analysis (ESA) rules:
 c' = effective cohesion intercept (c' = 0 for OCR < 2
and c' ≈ 0.02 σp' for short term loading)
 φ' = effective stress friction angle
 τ = c' + σ' tan φ' = Mohr-Coulomb strength
criterion
 σv' = σv - u0 - ∆u = effective stress
• Total stress analysis (TSA) is (overly) simplistic
for clay with strength represented by a single
parameter, i.e. "φ = 0" and τmax = c = cu = su =
undrained shear strength (implying "∆u = 0")

22

11
7/4/2020

Explaining the myth that "φ = 0"


The effective friction angle (φ') is usually
between 20 to 45 degrees for most soils.
However, for clays, we here of "φ = 0"
analysis which applies to total stress
analysis (TSA). In TSA, there is no
knowledge of porewater pressures (PWP).
Thus, by ignoring PWP (i.e., ∆u = 0), there is
an illusional effect that can be explained by
CSSM. See the following slides.

23

0.8 0.8
φ' = 30 °
Cc = 0.50
Void Ratio, e

Cr = Cs = 0.05
Void Ratio, e

0.7 0.7

0.6 0.6

0.5 0.5
10 100 1000 0 100 200 300 400 500
Log Effective stress,, σ v' σ v' (kPa)
300

(Undrained) Total Stress


τ = Shear Stress (kPa)

200
Analysis - Consolidated
Undrained Triaxial Tests 100

Three specimens initially consolidated


to σvc' = 100, 200, and 400 kPa 0
0 100 200 300 400 500

σv ' (kPa)

24

12
7/4/2020

(Undrained) Total Stress Analysis


In TSA, however, ∆u not known, so plot stress paths for "∆u = 0"
Obtains the illusion that " φ ≈ 0° "
300
τ = Shear Stress (kPa)

200
su400
su200
su100
100

0
0 100 200 300 400 500

Effective stress,, σv' (kPa)

25

0.8 0.8
Void Ratio, e
Void Ratio, e

0.7 0.7

VCL
0.6 CSL 0.6
Cs from Pc' = 400 kPa
Cs from Pc' = 500 kPa
Cs from Pc' = 600 kPa

0.5 0.5
10 1000 0 100 200 300 400 500 600
σv' (kPa) σv' (kPa)

300
τ = Shear Stress (kPa)

Another set of undrained Total


Stress Analyses (TSA) for UU tests 200

on clays: 100

0
UU = Unconsolidated Undrained 0 100 200 300 400 500 600

σ v ' (kPa)

26

13
7/4/2020

(Undrained) Total Stress Analysis


Again, ∆u not known in TSA, so plot for stress paths for "∆u = 0"
Obtains the illusion that " φ = 0° "
300
τ = Shear Stress (kPa)

200

su
100

0
0 100 200 300 400 500

Effective stress,, σv' (kPa)

27

Explaining the myth that "φ = 0"


 Effective Stress Analyses (ESA)
• Drained Loading (∆u = 0)
• Undrained Loading (∆V/V0 = 0)

 Total Stress Analyses (TSA)


 Drained Loading (∆u = 0)
 Undrained Loading with "φ = 0"
analysis: ∆V/V0 = 0 and "∆u = 0"

28

14
7/4/2020

Cambridge University q-p' space


σ 1'
σ 1 - σ 3) 6 sin φ '
σ 2' = σ 3' Triaxial Mc =
Compression 3 − sin φ '
q = (σ

Undrained OC
Stress Path
Λ
M  OCR 
Undrained NC ( su / p0 ' )TC = c 
Stress Path 2  2 
Drained
Stress Path
3V : 1H

σvo' = P0'
σ1' + σ2' + σ3')/3
P' = (σ

29

Port of Anchorage, Alaska

0.8
10
Deviatoric Stress = q* = (σ 1-σ 3)/σ p'

Critical State Soil Mechanics


0.7
(Modified Cam Clay)
Bootlegger o
0.6 φ ' = 27.7
Strength Ratio, su/σ vo'

Cove Clay Λ = 0.75


0.5

0.4
1
0.3 M c = (q/p')f = 1.10
φ '/(3-sinφ
M c = 6sinφ φ ') DSS Data
0.2
φ ' = 27.7o CIUC Data

0.1 MCC Pred CIUC


MCC Pred DSS
0.0
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.1
1 10 100
σ 1'+σ
Effective Stress, p'* = (σ σ 2'+σ
σ 3')/(3σ
σ p') Overconsolidation Ratio, OCR

30

15
7/4/2020

Cavity Expansion – Critical State Model for Evaluating


OCR in Clays from Piezocone Tests
1/ Λ
 1  q T − ub  
OCR = 2   
 195
. M + 1  σ vo ' 
φ’/(3-sinφ
where M = 6 sinφ φ’) Overconsolidation Ratio, OCR

Λ = 1 – Cs/Cc ≈
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
and 0.8 0

Depth (meters)
fs 8
Bothkennar, UK
10

12
CPTU
ub 14
CRS
IL Oed
16 RF

qc → qT 18

20

31

Cambridge University q-p' space


6 sin φ '
Mc =
3 − sin φ '
σ 1 - σ 3)

Yield Surface
q = (σ

Original Cam Clay


Modified Cam Clay

Bounding Surface

Cap Model

Pc'

σ1' + σ2' + σ3')/3


P' = (σ

32

16
7/4/2020

Anisotropic Yield Surface


φ’/(3-sinφ
Mc = 6sinφ φ’)
σ 1 - σ 3)
Yield Surface fctn(K0NC)
q = (σ

σp’
OC Y2
e0
σvo’
Y1 NC
Y3 = Limit State
K0
G0

σ1’ + σ2’ + σ3’)/3


P’ = (σ

33

Cambridge University q-p' space 6 sin φ '


Mc =
3 − sin φ '
Yield Surface
σ 1 - σ 3)

Apparent
fctn(K0NC)
Mc
q = (σ

σp’

Y3 = Limit State

σ1' + σ2' + σ3')/3


P' = (σ

34

17
7/4/2020

MIT q-p' space


tan α c = sin φ '
σ 1 - σ 3)
fctn(K0NC)
Yield Surface
q = ½(σ

σp’

Diaz-Rodriguez, Leroueil,
OC and Aleman (1992, JGE)

σ1' + σ3')
P' = ½(σ

35

Yield Surfaces
of Natural Clays

Diaz-Rodriguez,
Leroueil, & Aleman
(ASCE Journal
Geotechnical
Engineering July 1992)

36

18
7/4/2020

Friction Angle of Clean Quartz Sands


(Bolton, 1986 Geotechnique)

37

State Parameter for Sands, ψ


(Been & Jefferies, 1985; Jefferies & Been 2006)

λ10
void λ10 Wet of Critical
ecsl
ratio (Contractive)
e ψ = e0 - ecsl
e0 VCL
Dry of Critical
(Dilative)
CSL
p0'
σ1'+σ
p' = ⅓ (σ σ2'+σ
σ3')
log p'
38

19
7/4/2020

State Parameter for Sands, ψ


(Simplified Critical State Soil Mechanics)

ψ = (Cs - Cc )∙log[ ½ cos φ' OCR ]


λ10 ∆u = (1 - ½ cos φ' OCRΛ ]∙σ
σvo'
λ10
void φ'
then CSL = OCR = 2/cosφ
ecsl
ratio
e ψ = e0 - ecsl
e0 VCL
CSL
p0' σ1'+σ
p' = ⅓ (σ σ2'+σ
σ3')

log p'
39

State Parameter for Sands, ψ


(Been, Crooks, & Jefferies, 1988)

log OCRp = log2Λ + Ψ/(κ−λ)


where OCRp = R = overconsolidation ratio in Cambridge
q-p' space, Λ = 1−κ/λ, λ = Cc/ln(10) = compression
index, and κ ≈ Cs/ln(10) = swelling index

Georgia Tech

40

20
7/4/2020

MIT Constitutive Models


 Whittle et al. 1994: JGE Vol. 120 (1)
"Model prediction of anisotropic behavior
of Boston Blue Clay"
 MIT-E3: 15 parameters for clay
 Pestana & Whittle (1999) "Formulation of
unified constitutive model for clays and
sands" Intl. J. for Analytical & Numerical
Methods in Geomechanics, Vol. 23
 MIT S1: 13 parameters for clay
 MIT S1: 14 parameters for sand

41

MIT E-3 Constitutive Model

Whittle (2005)

42

21
7/4/2020

MIT S-1 Constitutive Model


Pestana and Whittle (1999)

43

MIT S-1 Constitutive Model


Predictions for
Berlin Sands
(Whittle, 2005)

44

22
7/4/2020

Critical state soil mechanics


• Initial state: e0, σvo’, and OCR = σp’/σvo’
• Soil constants: φ’, Cc, and Cs
• Link between Consolidation and Shear Tests
• CSSM addresses:
 NC and OC behavior
 Undrained vs. Drained (and other paths)
 Positive vs. negative porewater pressures
 Volume changes (contractive vs. dilative)
 su/σ φ’ OCRΛ
σvo’ = ½ sinφ where Λ = 1-Cs/Cc
• Yield surface represents 3-d preconsolidation
• State parameter: ψ = e0 - ecsl

45

Simplified Critical State Soil Mechanics


NC
CC
Void Ratio, e

dilative
Void Ratio, e

eOC
CS ∆u
-∆

OC
eNC ∆u
+∆
contractive

Log σv' σ p' Effective stress σv' φ'


τmax = σ′tanφ
φ′
Four Basic Stress Paths:
Shear stress τ

1. Drained NC (decrease ∆V/Vo) τmax = su NC


2 1
2. Undrained NC (positive ∆u)
su OC
3. Undrained OC (negative ∆u) Yield
Surface
4. Drained OC (increase ∆V/Vo) 3

4 ′≈ σp′
σCS′≈½σ σp'
τmax = c′′+σ
σ′tanφ
φ′ c'
Effective stress σv'

46

23
7/4/2020

47

24

You might also like