Three-Dimensional CFD Simulation Ofa "Steam Water Spray" Retort Process For Food Vegetable Products
Three-Dimensional CFD Simulation Ofa "Steam Water Spray" Retort Process For Food Vegetable Products
with the air to prevent any cold spots inside the retort [4]. along a defined time span. The temperature values are then
Steam water spray retorts are less expensive compared compared with those obtained from experimental tests and
with other types of retort. They differ from saturated used to define the sterilization efficiency of the process.
steam retorts in that air can be present in the retort In summary, the objectives of this work can be
during processing, meaning it can be an overpressure described as follows:
process. Nowadays retort treatment using pressured – To carry out the simulation of an industrial “steam
“steam water spray” is used especially for vegetables or water spray” retort process of a pumpkin soup pack-
soups, which can hardly be sterilized by means of con- aged in carton flexible container, to assess the tem-
tinuous processes, due to the possible presence of some perature trend as a function of time
solid pieces inside a homogeneous liquid. Metallic con- – To validate the simulation results experimentally
tainers, jars or heat-resistant beverage cartons, such as
Tetra Recart® or Combisafe®, could be used in this pro-
cess. Dividing retorts based on the presence and mode of
agitation, three categories can be defined: static or still,
2 Materials and methods
rotary and oscillating [3].
Two types of heat transfer occur during this process: 2.1 Equipment
convection and conduction. The convection rate can be
considerably increased by inducing a forced convection “Steam water spray” retorts from Allpax is used in this
by means of mechanical agitation of the trays. For this study (Figure 1); it utilizes a high-volume pump with an
reason many retort chambers are designed to provide array of spray nozzles strategically located to provide
longitudinal motion or reciprocating agitation of the pro- complete load coverage and create even temperature dis-
duct [5–13]. By means of these movements, it is possible tribution in both heating and cooling. The system uses a
to reduce the treatment time and to obtain higher quality host computer that stores product-configurable recipes.
products [5]. These recipes define the process parameters to be fol-
Literature widely explored the issue of retort process lowed, which can be automatically corrected to avoid
for vegetables and other food products [14, 15], with the process deviations. The retort system can contain until 6
aim to develop better understanding of this technology [16]. baskets, each composed of 16 trays, which contain 70
Some authors tried to approach the problem experimen- cartons per tray. This system is then able to sterilize up
tally [17], but the high costs and time consumption asso- to 6,720 bricks having a capacity of 500 ml or 8,640
ciated with experimentation have often precluded containers with a capacity of 390 ml per cycle.
producing efficient in-depth results [18]. In recent years The thermal cycle of the pumpkin soup lasts approxi-
the development of the numerical simulation helped to mately 2 h and it is composed of the following steps:
overpass this problem and to identify the best thermal – Preheating phase: the internal temperature of the
setting of the process [19]. Among the different numerical sterilizer rises up to 50°C at 2 bars (7 min)
approaches, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) appeared – Heating phase: the internal temperature of the steri-
as the most suitable in order to understand the evolution of lizer rises up to 110°C with an increased pressure of
the temperature inside the product during a retort process up to 4 bars (20 min)
[20–25]. All of these latter studies simulated a three-dimen- – Sterilization phase: inside the sterilizer the tempera-
sional (3D) process considering the real configuration of the ture reaches 130°C and the overheated water is
packaging, but none of them aims at analysing the flow of inserted with a pressure of about 4 bars; the product
steam water moving inside a retort chamber. Similar stu- is handled in these conditions for a defined steriliza-
dies have been performed for other food products, like tion time (45 min)
pasta [26, 27] or refrigerated chamber [28], showing how – Precooling phase: the sterilizer temperature drops to
is important the knowledge of the air/vapour flows for food 105°C with a decreased pressure to 2 bars (10 min)
processes. – Cooling phase: the whole system achieves an ambient
In this work, by means of the support of a numeric temperature and a pressure close to 1.5 bars (30 min)
solver (ANSYS CFX version 14.5), CFD simulations have – Discharge phase: when the system reaches the atmo-
been carried out to evaluate the temperatures reached spheric pressure, the retort system can be opened to
inside the brick during a “steam water spray” retort process, discharge the products (5 min)
At the end of the sterilization, all the cartons are discharged well known and can be easily retrieved from the soft-
on conveyor belts and they are sent to the secondary ware library. Conversely, for the food product, it was
packaging operation. necessary to find (or compute) the correct values for
From a technological point of view, the most critical each physical property. In particular, for the pumpkin
phase is the product heating phase, especially in the 5 min soup, the following properties were considered: den-
after the reaching of 85°C inside the product, due to sity, dynamic viscosity, thermal conductivity and heat
the difficulties in temperature control (usually after 1,680 capacity. The values of these properties were provided
s of treatment, including the preheating phase). This is the by a supporting company which, during experimental
time range in which the simulations were performed tests, has measured the corresponding data. Thermal
(1,680–1,980 s of treatment). The analysis was focused on conductivity was measured using the method
the heating phase, instead of the sterilization one, because described by Bellet et al. [29], dynamic viscosity was
it is the most critical phase in terms of product overcooking, determined by using Cannon-Fenske glass capillary
because the time and temperature are not controlled in this viscometer and density was determined by pycno-
phase instead they are fixed for the sterilization. metric and hydrostatic methods. Heat conductivity
was measured using the differential scanning calori-
metry (DSC) method.
To perform the simulation, packaging materials have
2.2 Materials also been considered. In fact thermal exchange happened
between the overheated water and the food liquid
The product used in this study is pumpkin soup, pack- through a thin multilayer food package. In this type of
aged in TetraRecart® brick having a volume of 500 ml packaging, paper is the material with the lowest thermal
with a width of 84 mm, maximum height of 46 mm and conductivity. For this reason only the paper layer was
length of 136 mm. The food product is filled by means of considered. All the properties of each material are
a piston filler, which ensures a good accuracy and a reported in Table 1.
limited head space (on average 13 ml). The sealed con- Before the simulation, preliminary tests have been
tainer was treated in the retort system (Figure 1). performed in order to identify the cold spot of the
In order to perform CFD simulations, three factors process. Six points located inside the chamber have
were considered: overheated water, pumpkin soup and been monitored in order to find the most disadvantaged
packaging materials. Properties of the first one are position in reaching the sterilization effect after the
Table 1: Properties of overheated water, pumpkin soup and whole process. This point has been identified as located
packaging paper used in the study. in the centre of the third layer starting from the bottom
of the vessels (Figure 5).
Overheated water
Figure 2: Configuration with (A) and without trays (B), and focus on the analysed brick (C).
modeller associated with ANSYS CFX software. By means of Table 2: Values of the surface mesh.
this action the fluid volumes are divided into a finite num-
ber of cells, on which the analysis is carried out. This Part Size (mm) Height (mm) Height ratio Tetra ratio
operation has been performed for both the configurations Wall . .
(with trays and without trays). Open . .
The meshes were created following a gradient, which Inlet . .
respects the Courant number. This number is crucial for Brick . .
Trays . .
transient flows. For a one-dimensional grid, it is defined as
Pipe . .
Δt
Courant ¼ u ð1Þ
Δx
reports the setting used to generate the surface mesh for
where u is the fluid speed, Δt is the time step and Δx is each part.
the mesh size. The Courant number calculated in ANSYS The volume mesh was initially generated by creating
CFX is a multidimensional generalization of this expres- a uniform subdivision and then thickened in the critical
sion where the velocity and length scale are based on the areas of the fluid volume. In particular, a finer mesh was
mass flow into the control volume and the dimension of used near the outlet section of the nozzles, because in
the control volume [30]. To decrease oscillations, improve these areas high shear rates are expected.
accuracy and decrease numerical dispersion, the Courant Figure 4 shows the generated mesh used for the
number must be kept sufficiently small (always < 10), calculation: an unstructured tetrahedral meshing scheme
which explains that fluid particles move from one cell was used for each configuration.
to another within one time step. The final meshes were determined when the increase
The number of cells used in the simulations was in quality of the mesh did not provide any significant
determined starting from a coarse mesh and gradually improvements in the results. The overall number of the
refined evaluating the changes in the results. The exter- cells created for the first mesh (Figure 4(A)) is about
nal surface mesh (Figure 3) was first generated as sug- 12,500,000, while, for the second one (Figure 4(B)), the
gested in ANSYS solver modelling guide [31]. Table 2 overall number of cells created is about 11,200,000.
@ρ
þ Ñ ðρU Þ ¼ 0 ð2Þ
@t
The momentum equation:
@ ðρU Þ
þ Ñ ðρU # UÞ ¼ Ñp þ Ñτ þ SM ð3Þ
@t
where the stress tensor, τ, is related to the strain rate by
this following equation:
T 2
τ ¼ μ ÑU þ ðÑUÞ δÑ U ð4Þ
Figure 3: External mesh surface.
3
Figure 4: Volume mesh of the configuration with trays (A) and without trays (B).
In this work, according to the adopted materials, two fluid soup, which is contained inside the brick, includes nat-
domains were created: “autoclave” and “pumpkin soup”. ural convection, and the Boussinesq approximation was
ANSYS CFX uses the concept of domains to define the assumed.
properties of regions where a fluid, porous or solid material Inside the autoclave domain the “thermal energy”
is located. In these domains, the equations of fluid flow or model was set in order to consider the heat exchange in
heat transfer are then solved. This implies the selection of this region.
3D bounding regions and the choice of appropriate physical Being also the water flowing in the “autoclave”
models for each domain. The interface between the “auto- domain at high velocity, a turbulent model has been
clave” domain and the “pumpkin soup” domain has been adopted. One of the main problems in turbulence model-
modelled as “thin material interface” meaning that this ling is the accurate prediction of flow separation from a
surface will be considered by the solver as a thin layer of smooth surface. For this reason, the model adopted was
solid material. In this case, paper has been set up as solid the shear stress transport (SST). The SST model, proposed
since it is the main material and also that with the lowest by Menter and Ekaterinaris [32], is an eddy-viscosity
thermal conductivity in Tetra Recart packages. A thickness model which is a combination of k–ω and k–ε models.
of 0.5 mm has been chosen for this solid layer. For the The first is used in the inner boundary, while the second
physical properties of packaging paper, see Table 1. in the outer region and outside of the boundary layer.
The following “thermal energy” model is used to pre- The SST model has been used in order to overcome the
dict the temperature inside the “pumpkin soup” domain: problems of both the methods. These features make the
SST model more accurate and reliable for a wider class of
@ ðρhtot Þ
þ Ñ ðρUhtot Þ ¼ Ñ ðkÑT Þ þ Ñ ðU τ Þ ð5Þ flows than the standard k–ω and k–ε models [32].
@t
The boundary conditions (Figure 5) are referred to 10
where htot is total enthalpy, which can be expressed as a inlet holes and 2 opening sections; in particular, a uni-
function of the static enthalpy h (T, p) as follows: form orthogonal velocity for the inlets and a relative
pressure for the opening are set. The external wall was
1
htot ¼ U 2 ð6Þ considered as adiabatic, while the other bricks (which are
2
not considered for the internal thermal process) were
The term Ñ ðU τÞ in eq. (5) is due to viscous stresses kept at 85°C. Table 3 resumes the boundary and initial
and it is known as the viscous work term. conditions for the autoclave domain.
Instead, as far as the flow of the food product inside All the simulations were carried out in the transition
the “pumpkin soup” domain is concerned, the laminar state, to evaluate the trend of the sterilization temperature
flow model has been chosen. The heat transfer in the inside the brick as a function of time. In particular for both
Figure 5: Boundary condition in CFX-pre-solver: (A) brick boundary, (B) inlet boundary, (C) opening boundary and (D) wall boundary.
the configurations, a total time of 5 min with a 0.5 s time step 1. Preliminary analysis of the product (density, dynamic
was adopted for each simulation. The simulation models viscosity, thermal conductivity and heat capacity)
were run on an Intel® Xeon® E3-1270 Quad Core (3.4 GHz) 2. Collecting of the samples
PC, with 16 GB RAM memory, under Windows 7 professional 3. Positioning of the temperature probes inside the
platform. With this configuration, the computational time for package
each simulation was about 4 days and 6 h. 4. Partial loading of the retort
5. Controlling and analysing the samples by opening
the cartons
2.4 Experimental method
The experimental tests have been performed to validate the According to the preliminary test (as reported in Section
simulations and to ensure a heat treatment able to give a 2.2) the tests were carried out using temperature probes
healthy and safe product to the consumers. The tests have located in the two bricks, which are previously considered
been developed according to the following procedure: as positioned in the cold spot inside of the retort.
Table 3: Boundary and initial condition. has been placed in the mentioned position is that in some
cases [20] the cold spot inside the container was located in
Boundary conditions the lower part of it.
Inlet m/s After the probes connection, the retort has been
Opening relative bars loaded with only a few hundred cartons, disposed in
Wall No slip wall and adiabatic two sections as supposed in the simulation model.
thermal condition
Brick No slip wall and initial
temperature at °C
Figure 6: Temperature inside the sterilizer (A); velocity inside the sterilizer at three planes: (B), (C) and (D).
3.1 Simulation results of the configuration 3.2 Simulation results of the configuration
with trays without trays
Analysing the temperature of the product in the configura- A similar increase of the temperature, with respect to the
tion with trays, it was observed that the product heats up previous simulation, is shown by the food product with
with the increase of the time. Figure 7 shows the increase of the configuration without trays. Figure 9 shows the tem-
temperature inside the brick during the sterilization phase perature inside the brick during the sterilization phase
at different time intervals (between 0 and 5 min) in a range at different time intervals (between 0 and 5 min) in a
between 85°C and 130°C. The first image on the left in range between 85°C and 130°C. In the case without
Figure 7 shows the temperature in the brick at the beginning trays, the temperatures of the external layer are higher
of the simulation, the second one shows the temperature than before (Figure 9). The first image on the left in
after 2.5 min and the last one at the end of the simulation. Figure 9 shows the temperature in the brick at the
The temperatures were also analysed as a function of beginning of the simulation, the second one shows the
time, in the previously defined point inside the product. temperature after 2.5 min and the last one at the end of
Starting by 85°C, the cold spot of product reaches about the simulation.
92.5°C after 5 min. The temperature trend in the cold spot As before, the temperatures were analysed as a func-
is described in Figure 8. tion of time in the previously defined point inside the
The simulation results were processed by means of product. Starting by 85°C, considered as uniformly dis-
Microsoft Excel to achieve all the simulated temperatures tributed inside the products, the cold spot of the product
in the brick. With those data, we were able to analyse the reaches about 94.5°C after 5 min. Figure 10 describes this
temperature trend in the product volume and not only in temperature trend.
a specific point. The simulation results were processed by means of
The percentage of volume with temperature values Microsoft Excel to achieve all the simulated temperatures
higher than some reference temperatures was reported in in the brick. As reported in Table 5, an increase of the
Table 4. percentage volume with higher temperature than the
Analysing Figure 7 and Table 4 it is possible to study reference ones was observed with respect to the case
the evolution of the temperature inside the brick during with trays. As before values equal to 100% mean that
the sterilization. At the beginning of the process there is a the entire volume is located at a temperature higher or
high temperature gradient between the brick’s surface equal to the reference temperature set.
(that reaches 108°C), and the lower part whose tempera- Even in the configuration without tray, a high tem-
ture is 85°C. perature gradient is present at the beginning of the
This difference decreases during the process but with sterilization (Figure 10), but it decreases in a more con-
a slow trend, because the heating exchange is due to a siderable way compared to the previous simulation,
conduction phenomenon and because in the mathemati- because of the heating exchange between the lower
cal model the heating exchange between the paper brick’s surface and the overheated water in the autoclave
packaging and the trays is equal to zero. (Table 5).
95.0
92.5
(°C)
90.0
87.5
85.0
82.5
80.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 Figure 8: Time–temperature trend in the pre-
(min) viously defined point inside the brick.
Table 4: Percentage of volume with T higher or equal to which has been evaluated by the simulation during all
Tref (at t ¼ 2.5 min and t ¼ 5 min). the process.
Figure 12 shows instead the trend of the temperatures
Tref (t ¼ . min) of the pumpkin soup and the retort chamber in the refer-
Tref °C K %Volume
ence time (after 1,680 s of treatment).
During the reference time (1,680–1,980 s), the tem-
T . perature values in the retort sterilizer and inside the brick
T . .
at a step of 0.5 min are reported in Table 6. The product
T . .
T . .
temperature has been taken in the same point before
analysing in the CFD simulation.
Tref (t ¼ min)
Tref °C K %Volume
4.2 Comparison with simulation results
T .
T . . Table 7 compares the experimental results with them
T . . provided by the software simulations. The following
T . . values refer to those measured and calculated at the
bottom of the product (cold spot).
Figure 13 shows the comparison between time–tem-
4 Experimental validation perature data obtained experimentally and by simula-
tions. From the figure, it is possible to observe a slight
4.2 Experimental tests deviation between the experimental results and those
calculated by the software for the configuration with
Following the procedure reported in Section 2.4, an trays. In fact the trays are modelled as an adiabatic wall
experimental test has been performed. Figure 11 reports and thus do not exchange heat with the overheated water
the temperature trend as a function of time for the steri- so they cannot transfer thermal energy to the base sur-
lizer chamber and inside the brick in the same point, face of the bricks. This limits the heat transfer surface for
90.0
87.5
85.0
82.5
80.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 Figure 10: Time–temperature trend in the local
(min) point inside the brick.
Tref °C K %Volume
T .
T . .
T . .
T . .
Tref (t ¼ min)
Figure 12: Temperature trend of the retort chamber and inside the
Tref °C K %Volume brick in the reference time (1,680–1,980 s).
T .
T .
T . . Table 6: Experimental temperature inside the retort chamber and
T . . inside the brick (step of 0.5 min).
Figure 11: Temperature trend of the retort chamber and inside the
brick. whole package surface allowing a very good agreement
between the experimental and the simulated data.
Table 7: Comparison between experimental data and those of the simulations with trays and
without trays.
retort chamber can affect the heating process of the slowest face”, with paper chosen as solid material (thickness 0.5
heating zone (SHZ) inside the brick located in the “autoclave” mm). The properties of these materials are the same as the
cold spot. To achieve this goal, the results presented in the ones shown in Table 1 and the initial conditions are the same
previous paragraphs are compared with those of a new CFD as the previous simulations. Also in this case, the simulated
simulation. In this new simulation only one brick, containing time is of 300 s.
pumpkin soup, is present and is surrounded by overheated The differences in the temperature distribution inside
water. Also in this case the interface between the soup and the packaging at the end of the simulation are shown in
the overheated water is modelled as a “thin material inter- Figure 14.
Figure 14: Temperature inside the brick at 5 min in the case of (A) simulation without trays and (B) “one brick” simulation.
Figure 15: Comparison between experimental data and simulation without trays and one brick.
Table 8: Comparison between experimental data and those of the simulations without trays and “one brick”.
chamber’s internal geometry affects the heath exchange fluids (CMC) during reciprocation agitation thermal processing.
process since there are evident differences in the time– J Food Eng 2015;165:1–12.
10. Singh AP, Singh A, Ramaswamy HS. Modification of a static
temperature trend of the brick’s cold spot.
steam retort for evaluating heat transfer under reciprocation
Future research will then be addressed to better agitation thermal processing. J Food Eng 2015;153:63–72.
simulate the process considering also the heat exchange 11. Singh AP, Ramaswamy HS. Effect of can orientation on heat
between the stainless steel trays and the paper packa- transfer coefficients associated with liquid particulate mix-
ging, in order to make the simulation results still more tures during reciprocation agitation thermal processing. Food
Bioprocess Technol 2015;8:1405–18.
adherent to the experimental ones.
12. Singh A, Singh AP, Ramaswamy HS. A refined methodology for
evaluation of heat transfer coefficients in canned particulate
fluids under rapid heating conditions. IChemE Food Bioprod
Nomenclature Process 2015;94:169–79.
13. Walden R, Emanuel J. Developments in in-container retort
Symbol Property Unit technology: the Zinetec Shaka® process. In: Doona CJ, Kustin
K, Feeherry FE, editors. Case studies in novel food processing
ρ Density kg/m3 technologies: innovations in processing, packaging, and pre-
t Time s dictive modeling. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing Ltd,
U Vector of velocity m/s 2010: 389–406.
p Static pressure kg/(m s2) 14. Durance TD. Improving canned food quality with variable
τ Molecular stress tensor kg/(m s2) retort temperature processes. Trends Food Sci Technol
SM Momentum source kg/(m2 s2) 1997;8:113–18.
δ Kronecker delta function 15. Teixera AA, Tucker GS. On-line retort control in thermal ster-
μ Dynamic viscosity kg/(m s) ilization of canned foods. Food Control 1997;8:13–20.
T Static temperature K 16. Simpson R, Teixeira A, Almonacid S. Advances with intelligent
htot Specific total enthalpy m2/s2 on-line retort control and automation in thermal processing of
k Thermal conductivity W/(m K) canned foods. Food Control 2007;18:821–33.
17. Dwivedi M, Ramaswamy HS. An empirical methodology for
evaluating the fluid to particle heat transfer coefficient in bi-
axially rotating cans using liquid temperature data. Food
Bioprocess Technol 2010;3:716–31.
References 18. Norton T, Sun DW. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) – an
effective and efficient design and analysis tool for the food
1. Singh RP, Heldman DR. Introduction to food engineering, 4th industry: a review. Trends Food Sci Technol 2006;17:600–20.
ed. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Inc., 2009:841. 19. Miri T, Tsoukalas A, Bakalis S, Pistikoupoulos EN, Rustem B,
2. Ansar Ali A, Sudhir B, Srinivasa Gopal TK. Effect of rotation on Fryer PJ. Global optimization of process conditions in batch
the heat penetration characteristics of thermally processed thermal sterilization of food. J Food Eng 2008;87:485–94.
tuna in oil in retort pouches. Int J Food Sci Tech 2006;41: 20. Abdul Ghani AG, Farid MM, Chen XD, Richards P. Thermal
215–19. sterilization of canned food in a 3-D pouch using computa-
3. Hardt-English PK. Commercial sterilization systems. In: tional fluid dynamics. J Food Eng 2001;48:147–56.
Heldman DR, editor. Encyclopedia of agricultural, food, and 21. Abdul Ghani AG, Farid MM, Zarrouk SJ. The effect of can rota-
biological engineering. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc, tion on sterilization of liquid food using computational fluid
2003:139–42. dynamics. J Food Eng 2003;57:9–16.
4. Williams JR, Steffe JF, Black JR. Economic comparison of can- 22. Augusto PE, Cristianini M. Numerical evaluation of liquid food
ning and retort pouch systems. J Food Sci 1982;47:284–90. heat sterilization in a brick-shaped package. Proc Food Sci
5. Dwivedi M, Ramaswamy HS. Comparison of heat transfer rates 2011;1:1290–4.
during thermal processing under end-over-end and axial 23. Kiziltas S, Erdogdu F, Palazoglu TK. Simulation of heat transfer
modes of rotation. LWT – Food Sci Technol 2010;43:350–60. for solid–liquid food mixtures in cans and model validation
6. Hassan FH, Ramaswamy HS. Bio-validation of bi-axial rotary under pasteurization conditions. J Food Eng 2010;97:449–56.
thermal processing. Food Sci Technol 2013;53:418–25. 24. Lee GM, Yoon BW. Developing an effective method to deter-
7. Ramaswamy HS, Dwivedi M. Effect of process variables on mine the deviation of F value upon the location of a still can
heat-transfer rates to canned particulate Newtonian fluids during convection heating using CFD and subzones. J Food
during free bi-axial rotary processing. Food Bioprocess Process Eng 2014;37:493–505.
Technol 2011;4:61–78. 25. Singh A, Singh AP, Ramaswamy HS. Computational techniques
8. Rattan SN, Ramaswamy HS. Comparison of free/bi-axial, fixed used in heat transfer studies on canned liquid-particulate
axial, end-over-end and static thermal processing effects on mixtures. Trends Food Sci Technol 2015;43:83–103.
process lethality and quality changes in canned potatoes. 26. Armenzoni M, Solari F, Marchini D, Montanari R, Bottani E,
Food Sci Technol 2014;58:150–7. Vignali G, et al. Advanced design of the pasta drying process
9. Singh A, Ramaswamy HS. Effect of product related parameters with simulation tools. Int J Simul Process Modell 2013;8:
on heat-transfer rates to canned particulate non-Newtonian 104–17.
27. Bottani E, Ferretti G, Manfredi M, Vignali G. Modeling and 32. Menter FR, Ekaterinaris JA. Computation of oscillating air foil
thermo-fluid dynamic simulation of a fresh pasta pasteuriza- flows with one- and two-equation turbulence models. AIAA J
tion process. Int J Food Eng 2013;9:327–39. 1994;32:2359–65.
28. Ambaw A, Verboven P, Delele MA, Defraeye T, Tijskens E, 33. Abdul Ghani AG, Farid MM, Chen XD, Richards P.
Schenk A, et al. CFD-based analysis of 1-MCP distribution in Numerical simulation of natural convection heating of canned
commercial cool store rooms: porous medium model applica- food by computational fluid dynamics. J Food Eng 1999;41:
tion. Food Bioprocess Technol 2014;7:1903–16. 55–64.
29. Bellet D, Sangelin M, Thirriot C. Determination des proprietes 34. Abdul Ghani AG, Farid MM, Chen XD. Numerical simulation of
themophysiques de liquides non-newtniens a l’áide d’une cellule a transient temperature and velocity profiles in a horizontal can
cylindres coaxiaux. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 1975;18:1177–87. during sterilization using computational fluid dynamics. J Food
30. Löhner R. An adaptive finite element scheme for transient Eng 2002;51:77–83.
problems in CFD. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng 35. Abdul Ghani AG, Farid MM, Chen XD, Richards P. Investigation
1987;61:323–38. of deactivation of bacteria in a canned liquid food during
31. ANSYS. CFX-solver modelling guide, release 14.0. Southpointe sterilization using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). J Food
275 Technology Drive, Canonsburg, PA: ANSYS, Inc., 2011. Eng 1999;42:207–14.