Death Notification Delivery and Training Methods: Research
Death Notification Delivery and Training Methods: Research
Search strategy
al, 2001; Amiel et al, 2006; Douglas, 2013). If poorly The literature search ranged from 1995 to 2018 to
delivered, it can become a lasting negative memory include contemporaneous literature and historical
for the person receiving the news and it is shown empirical data. The search used the CINAHL
to negatively affect the health outcomes of relatives electronic database and other sources, such as
(Baile et al, 2000). Consequently, this can increase Google Scholar, for grey literature results. The
the strain on the wider health service. It has been following search terms were used:
evidenced that paramedics use colleagues as a ll‘out of hospital’
source of informal support to mitigate the stress of ll‘breaking bad news’
giving a DN (Douglas et al, 2012). The aim of the ll‘pre-hospital care’
current literature review is to examine and critique ll‘death-notification’
the existing methods and training of DN within all ll‘death notification tools’
areas of medicine—as well as to understand how ll‘educational intervention’.
these can be applied to pre-hospital care and aid Additional words that were searched include
clinicians to use existing tools for this difficult task. ‘paramedic’, ‘nurse’, ‘doctor’, and ‘EMS’.
The CINAHL database was used as it includes
Death notification delivery allied healthcare literature to capture nurse and
Delivery of DNs poses difficulties for a number of paramedic evidence. Palliative care and oncological
© 2018 MA Healthcare Ltd
reasons. Firstly, clinicians only receive one chance studies were included to capture the experiences of
to deliver a DN to family members, which is a health professions who frequently break bad news.
cognitive challenge and gives no margin for error
(Meunier et al, 2013). Inclusion criteria
Secondly, attending paramedics do not have To gather a variety of empirical DN intervention
a significant relationship with the families of literature, the review included:
Identification
Records identified through
llCase studies regarding DN identified through
database searching
llStress testing and psychological effects on other sources
(n = 93)
clinicians when delivering DN (n = 128)
llAny practitioner level including pre-registration
students (paramedic, nursing or medical)
llDN educational interventions within any medical Records after duplicates removed
specialty (n = 54)
Screening
llAdult and paediatric literature
llAssessment-based tools regarding DN.
Exclusion criteria involved DN not relating to Records screened Records excluded
health care, editorials and commentaries on DN. (n = 54) (n = 31)
Figure 1 shows the search methodology.
Full-text articles assessed Full-text articles
Results for eligibility excluded, with reasons
There were three qualitative pre-hospital studies Eligibity (n = 23) (n = 9)
found in relation to paramedic emotional responses
to DN (Steen et al, 1997; Marco and Wetzel, 2012;
Studies included in
Douglas, 2013). These studies had small single-
qualitative synthesis
centered sample sizes and have been included
(n = 6)
in the results as a representation of existing
literature. The only pre-hospital tool found was
Iserson’s (2000) 10-step tool used by the College of Studies included in
Included
state that demand-laden and time-pressured eye level delivery, active listening—but it does
clinicians can forget the importance of these skills. reflect emotional and cognitive empathy through
Justifications aside, non-technical skills are equally stating ‘acknowledgment of feelings and support
as necessary in certain circumstances. Three tools of feelings’. Such extensive steps could make it
were found in the literature: difficult to translate into practice—this is partly
llSPIKES mnemonic (Baile et al, 2000) because extensive steps might be challenging to
recall. An aide-mémoire for clinicians may serve as The ‘space’ criterion within the GRIEV_ING
a reminder to increase compliance to this tool. The mnemonic is important for information-processing
final step, to make apparent what help is available, and allowing the person to express emotion in
is a key function of the tool. Relatives are often too response to the initial information. It also articulates
emotionally overburdened to plan ahead for the that the clinician needs to give clear communication
immediate future (Fallowfield and Jenkins, 2004). saying the word ‘death’ or ‘died’ to avoid
misunderstanding. The GRIEV_ING mnemonic may
Emergency medicine DN tools still be perceived as having too many steps (a total of
© 2018 MA Healthcare Ltd
The GRIEV_ING mnemonic (Table 2) has been 9) to retain compliance, which could be a limitation.
adapted for use in emergency medicine from oncology The ‘nuts and bolts’ criterion (which includes
(Hobgood, 2005). Despite its origins, the tool is inquiry around organ donation; funeral services;
appropriate for pre-hospital care as it offers an intuitive personal belongings; and offering relatives the
approach to DN through gathering family and offering chance to see the body) illustrates that this was
them external support—unlike the 10-step model. not designed for pre-hospital care. While this is
an important section, it must be noted that organ the GRIEV_ING mnemonic, the SPIKES mnemonic
donation in sudden OHCA may be perceived as advocates gathering close relatives in one place and
insensitive as a result of the lack of emotional controlling the environment as much as possible.
preparation relatives are afforded. This is difficult in pre-hospital care as settings
© 2018 MA Healthcare Ltd
1 1.
10 2 2.
Preparation
Establish what the person knows
3. Establish what the person wants to know
4. Give a warning shot
Available 5. Communicate bad news sensitively
9
3
help and 6. Acknowledge distress and support the expression
what of feelings
happens 7. Identify and prioritise concerns
8
4
9. Identify what support is available is available or
can be sought
7 5 10. Make apparent what help can be available and
6 explain what happens next
Figure 2. Iserson’s (2000) 10-step tool has been used by the College of Paramedics to deliver DN
the positive aspects of this tool is that it provides a The second study was from Douglas et al (2013).
structure for bad news and forms a plan of support This was a qualitative retrospective study examining
for the recipient. As with all algorithmic aids, it paramedics’ views on DN including experiences,
is dependent on user compliance and emotional communication, coping strategies and support
empathy through each step in the tool. needs. The authors set up paramedic focus groups
Further benefits include giving ‘warning shots’, to discuss all four aspects of DN. The authors do
putting a plan in place for the recipient, and not state inclusion or exclusion criteria or how
empathetic responses. These additions provide they analysed results, which reflects poor internal
support for the recipient who may need a re- validity. Four themes arose:
alignment of expectations, a simple plan to feel llPractical
aspects of DN
empowered, and application of the clinician’s llHow paramedics acknowledge the emotional toll
emotional intelligence in delivery. llHow they manage this toll
llThe support mechanisms they used.
Paramedic studies The paramedics were from rural or urban
The three pre-hospital studies from the literature Ontario, Canada, and self-selected to participate,
search had qualitative components, were poorly giving rise to selection bias. The researchers took
powered, contained high levels of methodical bias, note of length of service but not how many times
or lacked mention of statistical analysis. They either the paramedics had broken bad news. Dosanjh et
relate to the emotional consequences of delivering al (2001) found that when testing clinicians’ ability
DN or the timings of delivery . to deliver DN, years of service did not equate
The study conducted by Steen et al (1997) was to proficiency. The research includes accounts
a retrospective qualitative interview of paramedics of paramedics waiting for the police to arrive to
(n=33). Almost 50% of the participants (n=16) deliver the DN; this deferral of delivery should
suffered from anxiety and stress and felt ill-prepared not be counted as paramedic-delivered DN and
to break bad news. The authors stated that this led can lead to heterogeneous results. The clinical
to difficulties in personal lives and relationships. relevance of this study confirms that the previously
The importance of training and debriefing in these mentioned four domains exist but never explored
situations are key to maintaining wellbeing and methods of how to give an adequate DN that
positive experiences for staff (Ramirez, 1995). The would benefit the wider paramedic community.
study was highly descriptive and subjective with The third study (Marco and Wetzel, 2012)
© 2018 MA Healthcare Ltd
poorly powered numbers (n=33) creating poor examined timings of DN among survivors (n=26)
external validity. The results are concordant with of road traffic collisions. This research had no
more powerful in-hospital studies regarding clinicians formal methodical explanation of inclusion
feeling poorly prepared (Fallowfield and Jenkins, criteria, data-recording processes or synthesis of
2004). Therefore, these results infer clinical relevance results. The authors concluded that there was no
to paramedic practice but cannot be used in isolation. conclusive timeline as to when to deliver DN.
patient feedback (Vail et al, 2011). Rapport-building the need for a systematic review of DN tools and
through names, same-level eye contact and honest training drawn from multiple medical specialties.
recollection of events are all fundamental principles Beneficial facets of this tool would need to have
within the literature (Fallowfield and Jenkins, easily recalled steps (less than 10), a pre-hospital
2004). This is extremely relevant within pre‑hospital plan for recipients, and an educational intervention
care where no rapport initially exists and a DN is to implement this tool that could be adopted across
Despite not having a significant relationship with patients’ relatives, paramedics may deliver the worst news they will ever hear
UK-based ambulance services. This would serve Douglas LA, Cheskes S, Feldman M, Ratnapalan S. Paramedics’
experiences with death notification: a qualitative study. J
to support paramedics in what is an extremely Paramed Pract. 2012;4(9):533–539. https://doi.org/10.12968/
challenging message for any clinician to deliver. JPP jpar.2012.4.9.533
Douglas LA, Cheskes S, Feldman M, Ratnapalan S. Death
Conflict of Interest: None. notification education for paramedics: past, present and future
directions. J Paramed Pract. 2013;5(3):152–159. https://doi.
org/10.12968/jpar.2013.5.3.152
References Fallowfield L, Jenkins V. Communicating sad, bad, and difficult
Amiel G, Ungar L, Alperin M, Baharier Z, Cohen R, Ries S. Ability news in medicine. Lancet. 2004;363(9405):312–319. https://doi.
of primary care physician’s to break bad news: A performance org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15392-5.
based assessment of
an educational intervention. Patient
Fallowfield L, Jenkins V, Beveridge H. Truth may hurt but deceit
Educ Couns. 2006;60(1):10–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. hurts more: communication in palliative care. Palliat Med.
pec.2005.04.013 2002:16(4):297–303. https://doi.org/10.1191/0269216302pm575oa
Baile WF, Buckman R, Lenzi R, Glober G, Beale EA, Kudelka Fieschi L, Burlon B, DeMarinis MG. Teaching midwife students
AP. SPIKES—A six-step protocol for delivering bad how to break bad news using the cinema: An Italian
news: application to the patient with cancer. Oncologist. qualitative study. Nurse Educ Pract. 2015;15(2):141–147.
2000;5(4):302–311. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.5-4-302 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2015.01.008
Bowyer M, Hanson JL, Pimentel EA et al. Teaching breaking Goncalves F, Marques A, Rocha S, Leitão P, Mesquita T,
bad news using mixed reality simulation. J Surg Res. Moutinho S. Breaking bad news: experiences and preferences
2010;159(1):462–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2009.04.032 of advanced cancer patients at a Portuguese oncology
British Heart Foundation. Consensus paper on out-of- centre. Palliat Med. 2005;19(7):526–531. https://doi.
hospital
cardiac arrest in England. 2015. https://protect-eu. org/10.1191/0269216305pm1070oa
© 2018 MA Healthcare Ltd
Become a Reviewer
Volume 9 Number
10
www.paramedicpr
actice.com
October 2017
PARAMEDIC
Journal of
like to be considered for the JPP Review Panel, email the editor with Comment: Suppo
casualty incident
rt for students follow
ing a mass
RESEARCH
[email protected]
SAR helicopter param
edic practice: EtCO2
measuring for CPR
Examining param
edic attitudes towar
cardiopulmonary ds do not attempt
resuscitation (DNA
© 2018 MA Healthcare Ltd
CPR) orders
CLINICAL
The role of transt
horacic echocardiog
suffering cardiac raphy in patients
arrest
Incident
COMMENT aftermath:
What’s next for Engla
nd’s ambulance servic
student support
es?
CPD www.paramedicprac
tice.com