Status and Role

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

UCSP: Status & Role

Status and Role


In all of the many social groups that we as individuals belong to, we
have a status and a role to fulfill.  Status is our relative social position
within a group, while a role is the part our society expects us to play in a
given status.  For example, a man may have the status of father in his  
family.  Because of this status, he is expected to fulfill a role for his
children that in most societies requires him to nurture, educate, guide,
and protect them.  Of course, mothers usually have complementary roles.

Social group membership gives us a set of statuses and role tags


that allow people to know what to expect from each other--they make us
more predictable.  However, it is common for people to have multiple
overlapping statuses and roles.  This potentially makes social encounters
more complex.  A woman who is a mother for some children may be an
aunt or grandmother for others.  At the same time, she may be a wife for
one or more men, and she very likely is a daughter and granddaughter of
several other people.  For each of these various kinship statuses, she is
expected to play a somewhat different role and to be able to switch
between them instantaneously.  For instance, if she is having a
conversation with her mother and young daughter, she is likely to politely
defer to the former but will be knowledgeable and "in-control" with the
other.  These role related behaviors change as rapidly as she turns her
head to face one or the other.  However, her unique personal relationships
might lead her to think and act differently than what would be culturally
expected.  In other words, social group membership gives us a set of role
tags that allow people to know what to expect from each other, but they are
not always straight jackets for behavior.

Acquiring Statuses
The way in which people get our statuses can vary significantly in
detail from culture to culture.  In all societies, however, they are either
achieved or ascribed.  Achieved statuses are ones that are acquired by
doing something.  For instance, someone becomes a criminal by
committing a crime.  A soldier earns the status of a good warrior by
achievements in battle and by being brave.  A woman becomes a mother
by having a baby.  She also can acquire the status of widow by the death of
her husband.  In contrast, ascribed statuses are the result of being born
into a particular family or being born male or female.  Being a prince by
birth or being the first of four children in a family are ascribed statuses.  We
do not make a decision to choose them--they are not voluntary statuses. 
We do not pick the family we are born into nor do we usually select our own
gender. 

Both achieved and ascribed statuses exist in all societies.  However,


some cultures choose to emphasize the importance of one or the other.  In
North America today, achieved statuses outside of the family are reinforced
while ascribed ones are generally rejected.  Children are encouraged from
an early age to be independent and self-reliant.  They are told to better
themselves in life.  This can be seen in the admiration of "self-made
people" and in the somewhat negative image in the mass media of
people who are rich only because they inherited it.  This strong cultural
bias has led to the enactment of anti-nepotism laws for government jobs. 
These make it a crime to hire and promote people because they are your
relatives.  In addition, the North American emphasis on achieved status
has led to an acceptance and encouragement of social class mobility
and a rejection of gender and ethnicity based restrictions.  Children are
taught in school from an early age that, despite the fact that they may be
from a poor family, male or female, they should aspire to get a good
education, better themselves and their family economically, and even
become a leader in society.

In India, ascribed, rather than achieved, social status has been


strongly reinforced for more than 3,000 years and permeates most areas of
life even today.  As a result, social mobility has been very difficult to
achieve until recent generations.  Even now, it is limited for those at the
bottom of society.  At the heart of the Indian ascription system
are castes   (or varnas  ).  These are carefully ranked, rigidly hereditary
social divisions of society.

You might also like