MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Master Teacher I-IV

Name of Employee: JUFE C. PARTOSA Name of Rater: ANNABELLE M. CONGRESO

Position: MASTER TEACHER I Position: ESP - II
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: ZAMBOANGA CITY Date of Review: MAY 7, 2021
Rating Period: OCTOBER 2020 – MAY 2021

Mid-year Review/Rating
Weight per Mid-year Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Rater (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
KRA Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

Basic 1. Content 1. Modelled effective 22.5% Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet Quality
Education Knowledge applications of content with proof of attendance of colleague/s from:
Services and Pedagogy knowledge within and 1. an online observation of online synchronous
across curriculum teaching
teaching areas 2. if option 1 is not possible, an
observation of a video lesson that is SLM- based
or MELC- aligned
3. if options 1 and 2 are not possible, an
observation of a demonstration teaching via LAC
Efficiency
Timeliness
Basic 2. Promoted effective Any supplementary material (in print/digital Quality
Education strategies in the positive format) made by the ratee and used in the lesson
Services use of ICT to facilitate the delivery that highlights effective strategies in the
teaching and learning positive use of ICT to facilitate the teaching and
process learning process and Performance Monitoring Efficiency
and Coaching Form to show proof of coaching
and mentoring colleague/s
• Activity sheet/s
• One lesson from a self-learning module (SLM)
• Lesson plan (e.g., DLP, DLL, WHLP, WLP, Timeliness
WLL, Lesson Exemplars, and the likes)
• Video Lesson
• Audio lesson
• Other learning materials in print/digital format
(please specify and provide annotations)specify
and provide annotations)
 Mid-year Review/Rating
Weight per Mid-year Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Rater (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
KRA Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

Basic 3. Developed and applied Any supplementary material (in print/digital Quality
Education effective teaching format) made by the ratee and used in the lesson
Services strategies to promote delivery that highlights effective teaching
critical and creative strategies to promote critical and creative
thinking, as well as other thinking, as well as other higher- order thinking
higher-order thinking skills skills and Performance Monitoring and Coaching
Form to show proof of coaching and mentoring
colleague/s
• Activity sheet/s
Efficiency
• One lesson from a self-learning module (SLM)
• Lesson plan (e.g., DLP,DLL, WHLP, WLP,
WLL, Lesson Exemplars, and the likes)
• Video Lesson
• Audio lesson
• Other learning materials in print/digital format
(please specify and provide annotations)
Timeliness
Basic 2: Diversity of 4. Exhibited a learner- 22.5% Any supplementary material (in print/digital Quality
Education Learners & centered culture that format) made by the ratee and used in the lesson
Services Assessment promotes success by delivery that highlights effective teaching
and Reporting using effective teaching strategies that respond to learners’ linguistic,
strategies that respond to cultural, socioeconomic, or religious backgrounds
their linguistic, cultural, and Performance Monitoring and Coaching Form
to show proof of coaching and mentoring Efficiency
socioeconomic and
colleague/s
religious backgrounds
• Activity sheet/s
• One lesson from a self-learning module (SLM)
• Lesson plan (e.g., DLP, DLL, WHLP, WLP,
WLL, Lesson Exemplars, and the likes)
• Video Lesson
• Audio lesson
• Other learning materials in print/digital format Timeliness
(please specify and provide annotations)
 Mid-year Review/Rating
Weight per Mid-year Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Rater (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
KRA Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

Basic 5. Evaluated with Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet Quality
Education colleagues teaching with proof of attendance of colleague/s from
Services strategies that are 1. an online observation of online synchronous
responsive to the special teaching
educational needs of 2. if option 1 is not possible, an
learners in difficult observation of a video lesson that is SLM- based
or MELC- aligned
circumstances*, including:
3. if options 1 and 2 are not possible, an
geographic isolation;
observation of a demonstration teaching via LAC
chronic illness;
displacement due to Efficiency
armed conflict, urban
resettlement or disasters;
child abuse and child
labor practices Timeliness
Basic 6. Used effective Evidence that highlights providing accurate and Quality
Education strategies for providing constructive feedback to encourage learners to
Services timely, accurate and reflect on and improve their own learning that
constructive feedback to shows timeliness of feedback given to any of the
encourage learners to following
reflect on and improve • activity sheet
• performance task
their own learning
• portfolio
• quiz or test
Efficiency
• self-learning module and Performance
Monitoring and Coaching Form to show proof of
coaching and mentoring colleague/s
Timeliness
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Advised and guided 22.5% Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet Quality
Education and Planning colleagues in the with proof of attendance of colleague/s from
Services selection, organization,
development and use of 1. an online observation of online synchronous Efficiency
appropriate teaching and teaching
learning resources, 2. if option 1 is not possible, an
observation of a video lesson that is SLM- based
including ICT, to address
or MELC- aligned
specific learning goals
3. if options 1 and 2 are not possible, an
observation of a demonstration teaching via LAC
 Mid-year Review/Rating
Weight per Mid-year Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Rater (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
KRA Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

Timeliness
8. Modelled to colleagues One lesson plan (e.g., DLP, DLL, WHLP, WLP, Quality
the setting of achievable WLL, Lesson Exemplars, and the likes) or one
and challenging learning lesson from a self-learning module prepared by
outcomes that are aligned the ratee with achievable and appropriate
with learning learning outcomes that are aligned with the
learning competencies as shown in any of the Efficiency
competencies to cultivate
following:
a culture of excellence for
• Lecture/discussion
all learners
• Activity/activity sheet
• Performance task
• Rubric for assessing performance using criteria Timeliness
that appropriately describe the target output and
demonstrated in a LAC session as attested by
the LAC Coordinator/ Approving Authority with
proof of attendance of colleague/s
Basic 4. Community 9. Guided colleagues to 1. School letter approved by the school/ Quality
Education Linkages and strengthen relationships department/grade level head (e.g.,
Services Professional with parents/ guardians communication with the barangay to use a
Engagement and the wider school government vehicle to transport modules)
& Personal community to maximize 2. Approved action plan/ project proposal/ activity
Growth and their involvement in the proposal involving the stakeholders Efficiency
3. Accomplishment/ narrative report of an
Professional educative process
approved activity
Development Timeliness
Basic 10. Contributed actively to 22.5% Approved activity/project proposal for a webinar, Quality
Education professional networks retooling, upskilling, and other training/ seminar/
Services within and between workshop with accomplishment report
schools to improve • Approved activity/project proposal for
knowledge and to benchmarking or innovation with accomplishment
enhance practice report Efficiency
• Certificate as contributor to LRMDS
• Certificate of completion in a course/training
• Certificate of recognition/ speakership in a
webinar, retooling, upskilling, and other training/
seminar/ workshop
• Any proof of participation in school LAC Timeliness
sessions (online/face-to-face) certified by the
LAC Coordinator
• Others (Please specify and provide
annotations)
 Mid-year Review/Rating
Weight per Mid-year Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Rater (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
KRA Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

Basic 11. Initiated professional Main MOV: Quality

Education reflections and promote Synthesis of Individual Performance and
Services learning opportunities with Commitment Review Form- Development Plan
colleagues to improve (IPCRF- DP) of colleague/s
practice
Supporting MOV: Efficiency
Any document aligned with the IPCRF-DP
synthesis such as
• Certificate of recognition as resource speaker/
training committee chairperson
• Training matrix of LAC sessions highlighting
teacher’s role
• Minutes of LAC session highlighting teacher’s
role
• Sample personal notes/ reflection of colleagues
on regional/ division/ school-led INSETs and/or
other trainings supervised/ conducted by teacher
• Summary of evaluation/ quality assurance
report on the conducted regional/division/school-
led INSETs and/or other trainings
• Others (Please specify and provide
annotations)

Timeliness
Basic 5. Plus Factor 12. Performed various 10% Proof that the teacher: Quality
Education related works/ activities
Services that contribute to the • served as OIC in the absence of the principal
teaching- learning • represented the principal in meetings and
process conference
• observed teaching performance of Teachers I-
III
• assisted the school selection committee in the
 Mid-year Review/Rating
Weight per Mid-year Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Rater (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
KRA Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

evaluation of credentials when hiring or Efficiency

promoting teachers
• served in a committee
• served as adviser to co-curricular activities
• served as coordinator/chairperson
• authored/contributed to a book or journal
• participated in the RO/SDO/school-initiated
TV-/radio-based instruction
• served as module/learning material writer
• served as module/learning material validator
• coached and mentored learners in competitions Timeliness
• mentored pre-service/ in- service teachers
• others (please specify and provide annotations)

ANNABELLE M. CONGRESO JUFE C. PARTOSA

Rater Ratee Approving Authority