7-1

TA 7843-INO: Improving Sanitation Planning and Efficiency Improvement

Impact Evaluation of the Urban Sanitation and Rural Infrastructure Project

Terms of Reference

A. Background

1. The Government of Indonesia has received a loan from the Asian Development
Bank (ADB) for the Urban Sanitation and Rural Infrastructure (USRI) Support to PNPM
Mandiri Project. The Project aims at (i) upgrading basic rural infrastructure in poor villages
in four provinces, and (ii) promoting community-driven sanitation development to
contribute to achieving the Millennium Development Goal (MDG) target to halve, by 2015,
the proportion of people without sustainable access to basic sanitation.

2. The USRI project includes an associated capacity development technical assistance

(TA 7843-INO) to assist the Government to institutionalize sanitation related advocacy and
training programs addressing the limited understanding of clean water use, hygiene practice
and health. The TA is also expected to address the lack of knowledge on appropriate
technologies for establishing community-driven sanitation facilities in poor urban
neighborhoods. The Directorate General of Human Settlements (DGHS) is the Executing
Agency (EA) of the USRI Project and the TA. The DGHS has established a central project
management unit (CPMU). The DGHS as the key implementing agency and through the
CPMU is responsible for the day-to-day TA management and implementation, including TA
supervision, monitoring, and reporting. This consulting services assignment will be financed
from the TA proceeds.

3. The USRI is financed by a $100.0 million loan from ADB’s Ordinary Capital
Resources. The Project was approved on 5 August 2011, declared effective on 15 November
2011, and is scheduled to close on 30 June 2015. The project is implemented in about 800
rural communities in four provinces, and 1,400 poor urban neighborhoods in 34 cities in five
provinces. The project design monitoring framework is in Appendix 1, project locations are in
Appendix 2.

4. The impact of the Project is reduced poverty in the project areas; the expected
outcome is improved access to service delivery and healthy live conditions for the poor, near
poor, and women in the project communities. The project has three outputs: (i) strengthened
capacity for community planning and development, (ii) improved rural basic infrastructure,
and (iii) improved sanitation services.

5. Output 1: Strengthened Capacity for Community Planning and Development.

The project adopts a community driven development (CDD) approach. Under this output, the
project provides support to strengthen the capacity of communities to prioritize, design,
implement, and maintain infrastructure projects. The project deploys community facilitators
(CFs) to assist communities to carry out poverty mapping, identify problems and needs,
evaluate community implementation capacity, develop efficient planning and decision-making
processes; establish and run community implementing organizations (CIOs); formulate
development plans and specific investment plans to be financed by block grants; prepare
technical designs and implement civil works, and formulate and implement operation and
maintenance (O&M) plans to ensure sustainability of completed facilities.
6. Each participating village and neighborhood has established a community
implementation organization (CIO). CIOs comprise of at least five members elected by the
communities. On average, at least 30% of the CIO members are women. CIOs are approved
by the village heads/neighborhood officials and registered with the district/city satker,1 which
is the prerequisite for opening a CIO bank account.

7. Output 2: Improved Rural Basic Infrastructure. Block grants for basic

infrastructure upgrading are provided to 800 villages. 400 villages received three cycles of
block grants, 200 villages received 2 cycles of block grants and 200 villages received 1 cycle
of block grant.2 These villages are located at the 145 project subdistricts (kecamatans) in
Jambi, Lampung, Riau and South Sumatra that were previously covered under the RIS
PNPM II. About 200 villages, selected under the Project, have received one cycle of block
grants under another PNPM project financed by the government own resources (category A
village). The remaining 600 villages (category B village) are villages that have not received
any PNPM block grants.

8. Infrastructure upgrading financed by the project include building and repairing rural
roads, pathways, small bridges, irrigation facilities, water supply systems and public
sanitation facilities. Supported by CFs, the CIO takes the lead in developing village
investment plans in close cooperation with the community members. After the village
investment plans, which include the final technical designs and cost estimates, have been
approved at a village assembly and submitted to the DPIU for approval; a contract will be
executed between the CIO and the district Satker and the first installment of the block grant
will be released. Civil works are undertaken by communities with technical guidance from the
CFs, DPIUs, and consultants. Block grants are transferred directly to community bank
accounts managed by the CIOs.The first installments of 40% of the approved block grant are
transferred directly into the CIO’s bank account as an advance payment. The remaining
funds, subject to certification of progress by the DPIUs, are disbursed to communities in two
additional installments.

9. Output 3: Improved Sanitation Services. To ensure that community sanitation

facilities established under the Project are integrated in city development plans, only
neighborhoods located in cities with an approved City Sanitation Strategy (CSS) are eligible
to participate in the Project. 1,439 neighborhoods3 in 34 cities in the provinces of Central
Java, DI Yogyakarta, East Java, South Sulawesi and North Sulawesi, will benefit from block
grants to finance (i) construction of public bathing, toilets and washing facilities, (ii)
improvement of communal sewerage systems and waste treatment, and (iii) improvement of
disposal/reuse systems.

B. Objectives of the Assignment

10. The objective of the assignment is to assess and evaluate the overall impact,
outcomes and outputs of the project compared to the targets and performance indicators
specified in the DMF, gender action plans and other targets specified in project documents.

1
Regional working unit of MPW.
2
The original target was 600 villages to receive 2 cycles of block grants.
3
Originally 1,350 neighborhoods were targeted to be covered, the minor change added 89 more villages to the
target.
C. Scope of Services, Tasks and Expected Deliverables

11. The main expected results of the assignment are:

(i) an independent assessment of the USRI performance, with particular attention to
the achievements of the project against its targets and objectives;
(ii) an independent assessment of the USRI in terms of relevance, effectiveness,
efficiency, sustainability, impact;
(iii) key lessons and practical recommendations for the exit strategy of the USRI
project and consolidation and replications of achievements;
(iv) recommendations for ADB on future involvement in the sanitation sector
(particularly community-based system) and rural development activities (e.g.
second stage USRI);
(v) advices to the government to expediting the achievements of the target of 100%
coverage of sanitation services by 2019.

12. In addition to assessments on the achievements of the project quantitative targets

and objectives, the evaluation should include:
(i) An evaluation of quality of community empowerment and facilitation;
(ii) An evaluation of the quality of planning documents such the community action
plans, community sanitation improvement action plans (CSIAPs), mid-term
poverty reduction (MTPR) plans, city sanitation strategies (CSS);
(iii) An evaluation on the project implementation organization/implementation at all
levels;
(iv) An evaluation of the performance of all project stakeholders at all levels;
(v) An assessment of the quality of infrastructure built, including the appropriateness
of the used technology;
(vi) An evaluation of the project design, approaches and monitoring framework;
(vii) Project impacts on the participating cities/districts’ sanitation performance/targets,
sanitation institutions/agencies;
(viii) An evaluation of the project gender action plan;
(ix) An evaluation of project impacts on environment, poverty, gender, governance,
and sanitation sector development;

13. The expected deliverables are: (i) evaluations of the project results, impacts, lessons
and detailed recommendations for the project exit strategy including the consolidation and if
applicable the replication of the project approach and achievements; (ii) advice on ADB’s
future involvement in the sector. The findings and recommendations should be presented in
a reader friendly and professional manner and may include illustrations and photos,
interviews with stakeholders/beneficiaries, etc. The team will also be required to present
results of the assignment during a national workshop. The consultant should ensure that data
from a proper number neighborhoods and villages (proper sampling method) are obtained so
that conclusions are validated.

D. Period of Services and Staffing Requirements

14. The services of the consultant will be required for a total of 3.5 months. The
consultant team will be selected and engaged in accordance with the ADB’s Guidelines on
the Use of Consultant (2012, as amended from time to time). The NMC will be recruited
through selection of national firms. The quality and cost-based selection method, which
requires the submission a simplified technical proposal within 25 days,4 will be used to select
the consultant. A total minimum of 18 person-months of consultant inputs will be required,
including 14.5 person-months of national consultants and 3.5 international consultant inputs
are required for this assignment.

15. The assignment schedule is estimated as follows:

month-1 month-2 month-3 month-4

Activity 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
preparation of survey
data collection
data analysis
report preparation
workshop
report finalization

E. Team Composition and Qualification Requirements of Key Experts:

1. Sanitation Impact Evaluation Specialist/Team Leader (International, 3.5

person-months)

a. Roles, Responsibilities and Tasks

16. The main responsibilities of the TL include:

(i) lead and manage the team and ensure that all team members deliver his/her
high quality outputs in a timely manner;
(ii) lead the team in preparing and submitting all the reports and ensure a high
quality of the deliverables;
(iii) lead in the preparation of the evaluation methodology/survey tools, including
the determination of samples, control groups;
(iv) supervise and monitor data collection process and ensure that the collected
data are valid;
(v) ensure that all the required data/information to complete the assignment are
collected;
(vi) ensure that the collected data are properly and timely analyzed;
(vii) ensure the timely recruitment, mobilization and training of the field
investigators (surveyors);
(viii) present the overall impact evaluation results to project stakeholders (a
national workshop);
(ix) lead in coordination with ADB and the Executing Agency (EA) in obtaining
approvals and comments on the draft of deliverables;
(x) lead in data analysis process;
(xi) carry out analysis and review of city sanitation strategies (CSS) of sample
cities participating in the project. The review should include the quality of the
CSS compared to the standard CSS;

4
ADB’s procedures of recruitment of consultants allow shorter period for preparation of proposals, if the electronic
system is applied.
 (xii) review the quality of community sanitation improvement action plans (CSIAPs)
and other community sanitation plan documents;
(xiii) assess the quality of project manuals (JUKLAK/JUKNIS etc.), technical/design
standards, particularly for the sanitation part;
(xiv) assess the sanitation block grant size and effectiveness of their fund
channeling;
(xv) assess quality of built sanitation facilities;
(xvi) assess the quality of community facilitator selection;
(xvii) assess the selection process of participating cities and neighborhoods;
(xviii) assess the quality of training for sanitation community facilitators;
(xix) assess the project’s impact on participating cities’ sanitation development and
target achievements;
(xx) assess the project impacts on environment and sanitation sector
development;
(xxi) assess the quality of project monitoring and supervision by the Executing Agency,
participating cities/districts, consultants and other related stakeholders (sanitation
part);
(xxii) Assess the quality of management consultants supporting DGHS in implementing
and managing the project (sanitation part);
(xxiii) Assess the project management of data/information system including flow of
reporting;
(xxiv) lead in implementing other related tasks as requested by ADB and the EA, to
ensure the timely completion of the assignment.

b. Required Key Qualifications

17. The team leader/evaluation specialist is expected to have extensive experience in

project impact evaluation activities, and significant experience in leading teams. He/She is
preferable to hold a master degree in environmental engineering/health or other related
fields. Experience in evaluating urban sanitation and rural infrastructure related projects,
applying the community-driven development approach is preferable. The specialist is
expected to have experience in working in Indonesia. Basic knowledge of Bahasa Indonesia
will be an advantage. The TL is expected to have excellent English oral and writing skills, to
be a good team player and have excellent communication skills.

2. Rural Infrastructure/Development Specialist/Co-Team Leader (national

consultant, 3.5 person-months)

a. Roles, Tasks and Responsibilities

18. The main responsibilities of the rural infrastructure/development specialist include:

(i) support the TL and other team members in preparing the survey
tools/methodology, particularly in the rural infrastructure part of the project;
(ii) carry out analysis and review the quality of MTPR, CAP etc.;
(iii) support the TL to ensure that all the required data/information to complete the
assignment are collected;
(iv) support the TL to ensure the timely data collection;
(v) support the TL in the recruitment, mobilization and training of the field
investigators (surveyors);
(vi) present the overall impact evaluation results to project stakeholders (national
workshop);
 (vii) assess the quality of built rural infrastructure;
(viii) assess the quality of project manuals (JUKLAK/JUKNIS etc.), technical/design
standards, particularly for the rural infrastructure part;
(ix) assess the rural infrastructure block grant size and effectiveness of their fund
channeling;
(x) assess the selection process of participating districts and villages;
(xi) assess the quality of training for rural infrastructure community facilitators;
(xii) assess the quality of community facilitator selection;
(xiii) support the TL in report preparation/submission of deliverables;
(xiv) assess project’s impact on rural/village development sector;
(xv) provide a brief analysis on impact of the enactment of the new village law on
the rural/village development sector;
(xvi) assess the quality of project monitoring and supervision by the Executing
Agency, participating cities/districts, consultants and other related
stakeholders;
(xvii) Assess the quality of management consultants supporting DGHS in
implementing and managing the project;
(xviii) implement other tasks to ensure the timely completion of the assignment and
submission of high quality reports/deliverables.

b. Required Key Qualifications

19. The specialist is expected to have extensive experience in project impact evaluation
activities. He/She is preferable to hold a bachelor degree (S1) in civil/environmental
engineering or other related fields. Experience in evaluating rural infrastructure/development
related projects, applying the community-driven (e.g. PNPM Rural) development approach is
preferable. The expert is preferable to have experience in working in project areas (villages
in southern part of Sumatra). The expert is expected to have good English oral and writing
skills, to be a good team player and have excellent communication skills.

3. Statistician/Data Specialist (National consultant, 2 person-months)

a. Roles, Tasks and Responsibilities

20. The main responsibilities of the statistician/data specialist include:

(i) lead in the preparation of data collection methodology/survey tools, including
the determination of samples, control groups;
(ii) lead in the selection, mobilization and training of surveyors;
(iii) lead in the supervision of data collection process;
(iv) ensure that all required data are collected timely;
(v) lead in quality assurance of collected data and data analysis;
(vi) support TL in the preparation of all reports and deliverables;
(vii) support TL and other team members in delivering their outputs;
(viii) present data analysis results to project stakeholders;
(ix) undertake other related tasks to ensure the timely completion of the
assignment.

b. Required Key Qualifications

21. The specialist is expected to have extensive experience in data collection (surveys)
and analysis assignments. Experience in evaluation of similar project impacts would be an
advantage. He/She is preferable to hold a bachelor degree (S1) statistics or other related
fields. The expert is preferable to have experience in working in project areas. The expert is
expected to have good English oral and writing skills, to be a good team player and have
excellent communication skills.

4. Gender/Community Development Specialist (National Consultant, 3

person-months)

a. Roles, Tasks and Responsibilities:

22. The main responsibilities of the gender/community development specialist include:

(i) Assess the quality of community facilitations;

(ii) Assess the quality of community participations in all stages of project
implementation;
(iii) Assess the adequacy of project documents in ensuring a quality/proper
participation of community members including women, poor and marginalized
groups;
(iv) Review the project gender action plan and provide inputs and
recommendations for future improvements;
(v) Assess the project impact on gender and governance in project villages and
neighborhoods;
(vi) assess the project impact on the awareness of sound hygiene and sanitation
practices;
(vii) assess the quality of training materials and training system of community
facilitators particularly related to community/women empowerment and
mobilization;
(viii) assess the project information system on gender-related matters
(ix) assess quality of the project gender data (gender-disaggregated data in
baseline, benchmark, and completion reports) and gender audit reports;
(x) support TL in the preparation of all reports and deliverables;
(xi) support TL and other team members in delivering their outputs;
(xii) present data analysis results to project stakeholders;
(xiii) undertake other related tasks to ensure the timely completion of the
assignment.

b. Required Key Qualifications

23. The expert is preferable to hold a bachelor degree social science or other related
fields with extensive experience in projects/activities involving community in urban and rural
areas. The expert is expected to have excellent communication skills, including in preparing
high quality reports, both in the English language and in Bahasa Indonesia. He/She is
expected to (i) be familiar with the ADB’s and Indonesia’s gender and development policies,
(ii) be a team player, and (iii) have experience in working with international agencies.

5. Non-Key Experts (Data Collection Supervisors/Survey Coordinators)

24. Nine (9) non-key experts will be required to supervise and coordinate the data
collection process in the nine project provinces. The total allocated input for the non-key
experts is 6 person-months. Each coordinator will be responsible to ensure the completion of
data collection in his/her assigned province. The coordinators are tasked to support the TL in
mobilizing, training and assigning survey areas of surveyors. He/She will be responsible to
ensure the high quality of collected data. The consulting firm should properly allocate the
inputs of supervisors in each project province considering the coverage and number of
villages and neighborhoods to be visited by surveyors (e.g. in South Sulawesi and North
Sulawesi only one city participating in the project, while in Central Java 19 cities/districts).

25. The following are the required key qualifications for data collection supervisors: (i)
hold a bachelor degree in engineering (civil or sanitary engineering is preferable) or other
related fields, (ii) have experience in data collections/surveys, (iii) have excellent
communication skills particularly verbal communication skills, (iv) familiar with local culture
and structure.

26. It should be noted that non-key experts are NOT subject to technical proposal
evaluations. However, payments of non-key experts will be included under the remuneration
category (FIN-3 form).

F. Reporting Requirements and Time Schedule for Deliverables

27. The following reports should be prepared and submitted by the consultant:

(i) An inception report outlining the evaluation work plan and field work
methodology and analytical framework. The report should be submitted within
2 weeks of the issuance of the notice to proceeds (NTP).
(ii) Interim report providing progress of assignment implementation including
preliminary analysis of project impacts. The report is to be submitted within 1.5
months after the issuance of the NTP.
(iii) Draft Final Report, to be submitted within 2.5 months after the issuance of the
NTP. This report contains a comprehensive account of project evaluation
results and outcomes, lessons-learned, experiences gained, and conclusions
as well as recommendations, as specified in the scope of assignment. The draft
final report must be presented to and discussed with the ADB, Executing
Agency and other project stakeholders in a national workshop.
(iv) Final Report, to be submitted within 2 weeks after the completion of the
assignment. The final report should contain comments and inputs provided
during the discussion of the draft final report.
(v) Other reports as required by ADB related to the assignment.

G. Provisional Sums Allocation

28. The following activities are included in the provisional sums allocation:
(i) Training of surveyors and
(ii) National Workshop.

29. Term of references and estimated budgets for activities under the provisional sums
will need to be endorsed by ADB prior to their implementation.

H. Client’s Input and Counterpart Personnel

30. Office spaces and other equipment will not be provided. ADB cost estimate under
the OPE category has included budgets for office rentals, the running and maintenance
cost of the office including electricity, telecommunications and cleaning cost etc. The
consulting firm should also allocate sufficient budget for duty trips/travels to
cities/neighborhoods/villages required in carrying out the assignment.

31. DGHS and ADB will provide at no costs, access to all project documents and data
available at DGHS and ADB to support the implementation of the assignment. DGHS will
also assign counterpart staff at the CPMU and at the national Satker to work with the
consultant. Costs for these counterpart staff will be borne by the DGHS. At the local level, the
project cities/districts will appoint staff at the DPIUs and city/district satkers as counterpart
staff at the city/district level. Costs for these counterpart staff will be borne by the respective
project city/district. The project cities/districts will also provide access to
data/information/documents to support the execution of the work at no costs.

32. To facilitate the preparation of proposals, consulting firms are encouraged to

retrieve project documents available on the ADB website as follows:
http://adb.org/projects/details?proj_id=43255-013&page=overview.
 Attachment 1

Project Design and Monitoring Framework

Design Performance Targets and/or Data Sources Assumptions

Summary Indicators and/or Reporting and Risks
Mechanisms
Impact Assumption
By 2017: PNPM Mandiri National and regional
Reduced poverty in the Number of households in evaluations governments continue
project areas. project villages living below PODES village-level to support community-
poverty line reduced by at least and National Statistic driven development.
15% from project baseline (SUSENAS
household surveys) Risk
Natural or financial
disasters will impact the
project areas.
Outcome By 2014:
About 0.6 million poor people PPMS reports Assumptions
Improved access to in 600 villages will have access PODES village-level National budget funds
both service delivery to improved rural infrastructure and SUSENAS are adequate and
and healthy livelihoods and better service delivery household surveys provided in a timely
for the poor, near poor, At least 50% of villagers in Baseline and follow- manner.
and women in the project villages, of which half up impact evaluation Central and local
project communities. are women, are satisfied with surveys in target governments continue
improvements in local roads, project areas (MPW) to prioritize reduction of
drinking water, sanitation, and Independent NGO environmental pollution
other basic infrastructure. M&E reports in urban areas
PNPM Mandiri MIS
At least 50% of men and and evaluations
women in project urban
neighborhoods have increased
awareness of sound hygiene
and sanitation practices.
Increase in population with
access to improved sanitation
services by 20% in 2014 from
baseline that will be
established at the project start;
about 0.5 million people will
have access to improved
sanitation and new facilities in
the 34 cities.
Outputs By 2014:
1. Strengthened Functioning community PPMS reports Risks
Capacity for Community implementing organizations CF reports Prioritization and
Planning and (CIOs) established in about NGO reports planning are captured by
Development 600 villages and 1,350 urban District/city a few influential
neighborhoods (rukun administration community members.
warga/RW), with at least 30% evaluation reports A sufficient number of
representation of women in suitable applicants are
each CIO. available for recruitment,
At least two separate planning training and deployment
meetings for women as effective village
conducted in each village and community facilitators.
Design Performance Targets and/or Data Sources Assumptions
Summary Indicators and/or Reporting and Risks
Mechanisms
neighborhood.
MTPR plans formulated in a
participatory manner in about
600 villages; and
neighborhood sanitation
improvement plans in about
1,350 neighborhoods, with at
least 30% women participation
and 50% of poor residents in
planning meetings.
Well-designed investment and
implementation plans for
community-driven
development projects
formulated and approved in
about 600 villages and 1,350
urban neighborhoods.
2. Improved rural basic By 2014: Assumption
infrastructure through PPMS reports Communities have
community development Two cycles of block grant Impact evaluation surplus labor and
grants investments have been mid-term and final adequate resources to
implemented in each of about reports undertake civil works and
600 rural villages in the project NGO M&E reports maintenance of
provinces, addressing District government investments.
community needs (including plans and budgets
those of the poor, women, and
other marginalized groups).

Gender reports completed for

all block grant investments in
about 600 villages.

More than 70% of

infrastructure works are
evaluated as being of high
quality and have functioning
O&M arrangements.

At least 230,000 person-

months of immediate
employment opportunities
generated in the project
villages, with at least 30%
provided to women.
3. Improved sanitation By 2014, Neighborhood Assumptions
services through sanitation improvement block PPMS reports National, provincial and
neighborhood grant investments (Rp350 Impact assessment district governments
development grants million per neighborhood) have report allocate adequate staff
been implemented in each of City administration and resources for project
about 1,350 urban plans, budgets and operating entities.
neighborhoods (Rukun Warga, reports District government
RW) in the project counterpart funds are
districts/cities, addressing provided in a timely
Design Performance Targets and/or Data Sources Assumptions
Summary Indicators and/or Reporting and Risks
Mechanisms
community needs (including manner.
those of the poor, women, and Communities are fully
other marginalized groups). committed to the Project
and have sufficient
Community based sanitation resources to maintain
facilities, in accordance with project investments
the agreed-upon criteria and
standards are completed by
end of 2013 (in about 1,350
neighborhoods)

By end of 2013, gender

reporting completed for all
block grant investments.

At project completion, more

than 80% of infrastructure
works are evaluated as being
of high quality and have
functioning O&M
arrangements.

At project completion, at least

500,000 person-months of
immediate employment
opportunities generated in the
project villages, with at least
30% provided to women.
Activities with Milestones
1. Strengthened Capacity for Community Planning and Development Inputs
1.1 Recruitment, training and deployment of community facilitators (Q3 2011).
1.2 Socialization campaigns completed in project villages and neighborhoods (Q4 ADB: $100.0million
2011). Government: $27.6
1.3 Community facilitation and planning completed in project million
villages/neighborhoods, including separate women's meetings and poverty Beneficiaries: $8.0million
mapping in cycle 1 (Q4 2011) and cycle 2 (Q4 2012)
1.4 Selection of investments completed in project villages and neighborhoods (Q4 Consultants: 4,195
2011) person months of
1.5 Inter-village/kelurahan meetings for village/kelurahan-level representatives to national consultants;
support coordination and potential complementarities between investments Community Facilitators:
starting in Q4 2011 - for rural infrastructure:
1.6 Community investment plans finalized, O&M plans drafted and contracts 9.600 person-months;
executed starting in Q4 2011. - for the sanitation
component: 13,500
2. Improved Rural Basic Infrastructure through Community Development persons-months
Grants
2.1 Community members trained to implement village infrastructure plans starting
Q4 2011
2.2 Quality audit and gender reporting undertaken starting Q1 2012
2.3 Disbursements of first tranche of grants for investments completed (Q4 2011)
2.4 Disbursements of second tranche of grants for investments started completed
(Q2 2012) and cycle 3 (Q2 2013)
2.5 Disbursements of third tranche of grants for investments completed for cycle 1
Design Performance Targets and/or Data Sources Assumptions
Summary Indicators and/or Reporting and Risks
Mechanisms
(Q2 2012) and cycle 2 (Q2 2012)
2.6 Civil works of community investment projects completed for cycle 1 (Q3 2012)
and cycle 2 (Q4 2012)
2.7 Completion of operation and maintenance plans for the built facilities for cycle
1 (Q4 2012) and cycle 2 (Q4 2012)

3. Improved Sanitation Services and Infrastructure through Community

Development Grants
3.1 Carry out roadshows to register community interest starting Q1 2011
3.2 Implementation of training for community members on sanitation awareness
and improvement plans starting Q4 2011
3.3 Implementation of quality audit and gender reporting starting Q1 2012
3.4 Disbursements of first tranche of grants for investments completed (Q4 2011)
3.5 Disbursements of second tranche of grants for investments started completed
(Q2 2012) and cycle 3 (Q2 2013)
3.6 Disbursements of third tranche of grants for investments completed for cycle 1
(Q2 2012) and cycle 2 (Q3 2012)
3.7 Civil works of community investment projects completed for cycle 1 (Q3 2012)
and cycle 2 (Q4 2012)
3.8 Community O&M plans for cycle 2 investments finalized for cycle 1 (Q4 2012)
and cycle 2 (Q1 2013)
ADB = Asian Development Bank, M&E = monitoring and evaluation, MIS = management information
system, MOHA = Ministry of Home Affairs, MPW = Ministry of Public Works, MTPR = medium-term
poverty reduction, NGO = nongovernment organization, O&M = operation and maintenance, PNPM =
Program Nasional Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (National Program for Community Empowerment), PODES
= Potensial Desa (Village Potential Statistics), PPMS = project
 Attachment 2

List of Project Cities/Districts

I. Urban Sanitation

A. Central Java:
1. Kota Semarang
2. Kota Pekalongan
3. Kabupaten Cilacap
4. Kabupaten Banyumas
5. Kabupaten Purbalingga
6. Kabupaten Kebumen
7. Kabupaten Purworejo
8. Kabupaten Klaten
9. Kabupaten Sukoharjo
10. Kabupaten Sragen
11. Kabupaten Rembang
12. Kabupaten Blora
13. Kabupaten Kudus
14. Kabupaten Brebes
15. Kabupaten Jepara
16. Kota Magelang
17. Kota Surakarta
18. Kota Tegal

B. DI Yogyakarta

1. Kabupaten Bantul
2. Kabupaten Sleman

C. East Java

1. Kabupaten Blitar
2. Kabupaten Bojonegoro
3. Kabupaten Gresik
4. Kabupaten Jombang
5. Kabupaten Malang
6. Kota Batu
7. Kota Blitar
8. Kota Kediri
9. Kota Malang
10. Kota Pasuruan
11. Kota Probolinggo
12. Kota Surabaya

D. South Sulawesi
1. Kota Makassar
 E. North Sulawesi

1. Kota Manado.

II. Rural Infrastructure

A. Riau

1. Kabupaten Kuantan Singingi

2. Kabupaten Indragiri Hilir
3. Kabupaten Indragiri Hulu
4. Kabupaten Pelalawan
5. Kabupaten Siak
6. Kabupaten Kampar
7. Kabupaten Rokan Hulu
8. Kabupaten Bengkalis
9. Kabupaten Kepulauan Meranti

B. Jambi

1. Kabupaten Kerinci
2. Kota Sungai Penuh
3. Kabupaten Sarolangun
4. Kabupaten Tanjung Jabung Timur

C. South Sulawesi

1. Kabupaten Ogan Komering Ulu

2. Kabupaten Ogan Komering Ilir
3. Kabupaten Muara Enim
4. Kabupaten Lahat
5. Kabupaten Musi Rawas
6. Kabupaten Musi Banyu Asin
7. Kabupaten Banyu Asin
8. Kabupaten Ogan Komering Ulu Selatan
9. Kabupaten Ogan Komering Ulu Timur
10. Kabupaten Ogan Ilir
11. Kabupaten Empat Lawang

D. Lampung

1. Kabupaten Tanggamus
2. Kabupaten Lampung Selatan
3. Kabupaten Tulang Bawang
4. Kabupaten Lampung Tengah
5. Kabupaten Lampung Timur
6. Kabupaten Pesawaran