Structural Design of G 6 Urban Building
Structural Design of G 6 Urban Building
Structural Design of G 6 Urban Building
STRUCTURAL DESIGN
CHAPTER ONE
1. INTRODUCTION
Now a day's construction industry plays a great role for the development of a nation in all
aspects. As we all agree, behind every construction activity there must have a structural analysis
and design, from this consideration directly or indirectly structural analysis and design have a
huge application in the development of a nation. A structural design is executed in such a way
that the building will remain fit with appropriate degrees of reliability and in an economic way. It
should sustain all the actions and influences during execution and use. Therefore, structural
design focuses on structural safety and serviceability with due durability. It must also optimize
the cost expended in building the structure and maintenance. The project will contain detail
structural analysis of the building, structural design, detail working structural drawings &
statistical report.
This project deals about the structural analysis and design of a G+6 urban building considering
all the external effects according to EBCS, 1995. It has six chapters. The contents and duties
accomplished in each chapter are explained below.
The first chapter deals with the introduction part of this project. The introduction part includes:
objectives of the project, scope, specification &code, and general design data& material
properties.
The second chapter deals about the wind load analysis and design on roofs and roof slabs. The
external wind pressure coming from different directions were collected and transferred to
frames according to EBCS, 1995.We divided the roof of the building into three parts(Duo-
pitched, Mono-pitched and roof slab) and each of its truss members made of steel were designed
to resisting axial forces.
1
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
The third chapter focuses on the analysis and design of slabs and staircases. Most of the slabs
are ribbed slabs and some solid slabs. The depths of all the ribbed slabs are made the same for
construction simplicity and reinforcement of each is determined using EBCS2, 1995.
The Fourth chapter is about the calculation of lateral forces particularly earthquakes loads.
The weight of the building was computed by considering all elements from small to large. The
center of mass and center of stiffness were computed by assuming preliminary sections. The
lateral forces were distributed to each floor and subsequently to frame joints according to their
stiffness.
The fifth chapter deals on the analysis and design of the frame of the structures and shear wall
design. It was analyzed using ETABS as space frame taking combinations for the existing lateral
and vertical loads. Therefore, the beams and columns were designed using the loads obtained
from analysis by taking the worst effect.
Finally, the last chapter focuses on foundation design of the structure. After calculating the
bearing capacity of the soil an isolated square footing is considered by taking two worst load
combinations to support and safely distribute all the actions coming from the super structure.
1.1 OBJECTIVES
The prime objective of structural design is structural safety and serviceability. In case the
structure fails, it must be in such a way it will minimize risks and casualty.
The specific objectives of this part of our senior project are:
2
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
Material
3
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
Loading
Since the site is located in Addis Ababa, which is in the area of seismic zone 2, according to
EBCS-8, 1995 in addition to vertical loading Earthquake and wind loading was considered. The
combination is done based on EBCS-2; 1995 section 3.6.
Combo 1=1.3DL+1.6LL
Combo 12 =Envelope
EBCS -1995 and Euro Code 2-1992 (as used by the software), almost similar to EBCS-2-1995
Partial safety factors – concrete γc=1.5(ordinary loading) [EBCS-2, 1995 table 3.1]
Steel γs=1.15
Design constants
4
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
Fc = 25Mpa
fck=fc/1.25=25/1.25=20 Mpa
fyk =300Mpa
fyd=fyk/γs=300/1.15 =260.87Mpa
m=fyd/0.8*fcd=260.87/0.8*11.33= 28.77
0.8c * fcd
b
c s * fyd
εc (Strain of concrete)=0.0035
εs = fyd/Es=260.87/200000= 0.0013
ρmax=0.75*ρb=0.75*0.025= 0.0189
ρmin=0.5/fyk=0.5/300= 0.0017
5
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
Design loads
Pd= γf*Fk
6
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
CHAPTER TWO
(For 1.2and building height less than 200m) can be analyzed using quasi static method of
analysis
Category-2 is classified as farmland with boundary hedges, occasional small farm structure,
houses or trees. The variables for terrain category-2 are:
7
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
1. Duo-pitched
2. Mono-pitched
3. Roof slab
Where:-
Where:-
: - Air density which is a function of altitude. For a site located at an altitude greater
than 2000m above sea level ρ=0.94Kg/m3
:- Reference wind velocity
Where:-
Pressure Coefficients
According to EBCS-1 figure A.6. , the pressure coefficients for duo-pitched are given as follow:-
9
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
20m
Where:-
For
For
10
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
Therefore,
Ce(z) = Cr2(z)Ct2(z)[1+ 7KT/Cr(z)Ct(z)] =2.89
2000cm
F 2*5 = 10
G 2*10 = 20
H 6.5*20 = 130
J 2*20 = 40
I 6.5*20 = 130
From EBCS -1 table A-4 two cases where the roof is subjected to wind actions
Case -1
When F, G, H subjected to suction according to EBCS -1 table A.4
11
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
Zones
Pitch F G H I J
Angle
150
= for
= +( ) for
= for
F 10 -0.9
G 20 -0.8
H 130 -0.3
I 130 -0.4
J 40 -1
= 227.48*2.890*
12
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
= 0.657
= 227.48*2.890*
= 0.657
According to EBCS -1, 1995 A.2.9 for closed building with internal partition and opening
windows the extreme values are
Therefore, =
Case 1
The unfavorable condition is when the external wind action is pressure and internal is suction
0.657*(
F G H I J
13
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
0.460
Case 2
The unfavorable condition is when the external wind action is suction and internal is pressure.
0.657 *(
F G H I J
-0.9 -0.8 -0.3 -0.4 -1
0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8
-1.70 -1.60 -1.1 -1.2 -1.8
( -1.117 -1.051 -0.723 -0.788 -1.183
14
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
There are also two types of wind pressures acting on the roof:
a )External wind pressure: The external wind pressure that acts on the roof is obtained as
follows:
Pressure Coefficients:
According to EBCS-1 figure A.6. , the pressure coefficients for duo-pitched are given as follow:
1700=b
e = 17m
15
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
The unfavorable condition is only when the external wind action is suction. According to EBCS
– 1, table A-4, the and values for 150 inclinations are:-
F G H I
= for
= +( ) for
= for
= 227.48*2.890*
= 0.657
= 227.48*2.890*
16
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
= 0.657
According to EBCS -1, 1995 A.2.9 for closed building with internal partition and opening
windows the extreme values are:
Therefore, =
The unfavorable condition is when the external wind action is suction and the internal is pressure
F G H I
= -1.450 (
Therefore, for the duo-pitched roof, when wind direction is parallel to the roof ridge (ø=900) and
0
perpendicular to the roof ridge ( ) the maximum suction and pressure will be:
17
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
A. Dead load
B. Live load
C. Wind load
A. Dead load
Dead load self-weight of the purlin
18
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
Applying 50% increase for overlapping and fastening for G-28 CIS
B. Live load: according to EBCS-1, 1995 slopping roofs are under category H. The
characteristics values of and are given in table 2.13 and 2.14 in EBCS -1, 1995.
The distributed live load
The concentrated live load
Therefore the uniformly distributed and concentrated live loads on our roof truss are:
C. Wind load
There are two critical wind loads
Note that the wind load acts perpendicular to the rafter, however the LL and DL acts at angle
0
for Duo-pitched. Therefore DL and LL are resolved into parallel and perpendicular to
the rafter.
19
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
Dead load 0
= 0.03KN/m
Live load
Uniformly distributed live load
0
= 0.0712KN/m
Concentrated live load
0
= 0.2588KN
Loads perpendicular to the rafter
Dead load 0
= 0.1053KN/m
Live load
Uniformly distributed live load
0
= 0.266KN/m
Concentrated live load
0
= 0.966KN
= 0.153 KN/m
Or
= 0.563 KN/m
Or
= 0.693 KN/m
Or
= 0.122 KN/m
21
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
Or
Or
= -1.484 KN/m
Or
= 0.968 KN/m
= -1.980 KN/m
22
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
= 0.039*2.52/8 + 0.414*2.5/4
= 0.289 KN.m
= 0.256 KN
W = -1.980 KN/m
According to EBCS-3, 1995 ordinary hot rolled steel with grade of Fe360 is taken.
Hence,
fy = 235Mpa
23
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
Fu= 360Mpa
Depth = h - 3
= 50-3
= 41mm
C= b – 3t
= 50 – 3*3
= 41mm
= …………………………..OK
For loads perpendicular to the rafter
= …………………………..OK
24
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
Where:
= 20.203KN
But VII2 V2)
0.292 2.552)
2.56KN
…………………………………….Ok
25
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
Properties
Weight
Weight
26
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
Live Load
Wind Load
Case 1 – positive wind load (Pressure)
27
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
III. Load Combinations for Limit State Design According to EBCS-1, 1995
Combination 1= 1.3DL + 1.6LL
28
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
CHAPTER THREE
29
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
ii. When transverse ribs are provided, the center to center distance shall not exceed 20times the
overall depth of the ribbed slab.
iii. The transverse rib shall be designed for at least half the values of maximum moments and shear
force in the longitudinal direction spanning ribs.
Construction method
30
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
31
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
Fyk
d > [0.4 + 0.6 ] Le/βa
400
32
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
From the above table, the governing depth (dj) will be the one with maximum depth. That
is:
dj = 177.08 mm
Ǿ 6mm stirrup
Dj = dj +15 + 7 + 6
= 177.08 +15 +7 + 6
Dj = 205.08 mm
33
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
Dj < 4bj
min 40mm
D = ht +Dj
D =80mm + 220mm
D = 300 mm
1
Thickness of topping shall not less than 40mm, or not less than of the clear
10
distance between ribs
Assume thickness of toping is 80mm > 40 mm…………….OK!
34
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
35
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
Dead weight
Dead loads can be also added to each panels due to some part ions available.
36
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
37
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
Generally, Ribs (joists) are designed as regular T- beam sections supported by girders.
Dimension:
d = D – 15- dia.14/2 = 300 -15 -7
d = 278mm
Checking depth of the section
d ≥ √M/0.2952fcdbw = √(35.41*106)/0.2952*11.33*150
d ≥ 265.70mm So, depth is safe which is d = 278mm
Checking the moment capacity( Limiting moment)
Limiting moment for 15% moment redistribution
X = 91.18mm
But, the maximum applied moment at the upper section is 35.41KNm < Mlim =131.74 KNm. So,
the section is safe.
38
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
But, again the maximum applied moment at the bottom section is 27.93KNm < Mlim =29.94
KNm. So, the section is safe.
= {1 –[1-2*23.77*106/(660*2782*11.33)]0.511.33/260.87
. As = ρbd = 0.002*150*278
= 85mm2
39
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
. As = ρbd = 0.003*150*278
= 126mm2
By considering the maximum moment at span we can design the four panels (s1, s2 s3 &s4) in this
section.
. As = ρbd = 0.0022*150*278
= 92mm2
40
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
Dimension:
d = 278mm
X = 91.18mm
41
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
But, the maximum applied moment at the upper section is 16.58KNm < Mlim =131.74 KNm. So,
the section is safe.
But, again the maximum applied moment at the bottom section is 16.58KNm < Mlim =29.94
KNm. So, the section is safe.
ρ = {1 –[1 -2M/(bed2fcd)]0.5}fcd/fyd =
= {1 –[1-2*15.99*106/(660*2782*11.33)]0.511.33/260.87
42
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
By considering the maximum moment at span we can design the four panels (S8,S9 &S10) in this
section.
. As = ρbd = 0.002*150*278
= 85mm2
One-way slabs transmit their load in one direction while two way slabs resist applied load in two
directions. These types of slabs are composed of rectangular panels supported at all four edges by walls
or beams stiff enough to be treated as unyielding. In our case most of the slabs are two way and need to
be analyzed based on the principle of two way actions.
43
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
Beams 20 24 28 10
Slabs
Span ratio=2:1 25 30 35 12
Span ratio=1:1 35 40 45 10
Note that: For slabs with intermediate span ratio, linear interpolation can be used.
Loading
Dead and live loads are calculated depending on the service of the slabs and self-weight. Ignoring any
localized effects caused by concentrated load, the partition loads are distributed over the area of the
slab. The design loads are factored according to the following formula.
44
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
Where
Analysis
The analysis of slab moments of two way slabs is accomplished by the formula:
Where
s = support
f = span
45
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
Moment Adjustments
Support adjustment
For a continuous support there will be two supports which are different in magnitude. These moments
are usually different in magnitude and must be adjusted to come up with one design moment.
Therefore, the difference is distributed on either side of the support to equalize the different moments.
A. If of the larger moment, the design moment is the average of the two or the larger
moment.
B. If , the unbalanced moment is distributed based on the stiffness without any carry
over.
Let:
Therefore the design moment, cab be calculated in eitherof the following formula
46
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
Span adjustment
If the moment in the adjusted support decreases, the span moment are increased to compensate for the
changes in the support moments. The design moments for the spans are calculated.
Where: - .
5.
Finally loads are transferred to beams as shear. The shear is calculated using the formula (EBCS-2, 1995).
The load transfer coefficients are read from EBCS-2, 1995 of Table A-3.
The design load on a beam determined in the above may be taken as the maximum shear in the slab at
the support which will be distributed on 75% of the span of the beam. For the sake of simplicity the load
is uniformly distributed throughout the length of the beam by multiplying the existing shear by 0.92.
47
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
Depth Determination
48
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
Intermediate
SS2 4000 37.5 90.67
panel
For safety against any unforeseen considerations, we can consider 150mm overall depth of slab.
Loading
The slab is loaded with both dead load and live load. The dead load comes from the slab self-weight,
floor finish, cement screed, plastering and partition wall, if any is present.
49
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
Where,
Using the above formulas, all the panel moments were computed and are tabulated in the table below.
50
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
Pane
Type
l
SS2 10.14 4.00 1.3 0.076 0.057 - 0.044 12.33 9.25 0.00 7.14
Moment Adjustment
51
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
Pan
Type
el
SS2 10.14 4.0 1.3 0.53 0.35 - 0.3 21.5 19.2 - 12.2
52
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
The reinforcements are provided for the design moments based on the formula below
The geometrical main reinforcement ration at any section of a slab where positive reinforcement is
required by analysis shall not be less than that given by:
The table below shows the reinforcements provides for each slab.
53
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
Steel As
Position Moment Depth Ration Calculated S Required ф of Bar
54
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
CHAPTER FOUR
Stair case analysis and design is similar to slabs. It involves the analysis steps followed for slabs.
The inclined configuration is analyzed by projecting the loads on a horizontal plane. The stair
contains three flights with the same configuration.
55
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
steel, effective span length of the shortest span in which more load is expected to transfer and
support condition.
Loading: - This determines the total load in the stair and landing
Analysis: - determines moment and shear forces based on the analyzed moment
56
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
Check depth for flexure: - this step helps to cross check the design depth as it is safe for
flexure or not, if not revise the depth determined in step 1 and also the loads.
Detailing: the arrangement of reinforcement bars and their length are determined
and drawn.
Material properties
The following information are taken from the above section of stair case
57
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
To provide same depth for all types of stairs compare overall depth and take maximum of all sections.
To determine the overall depth of the stair slab, we consider the following:
Assume φ14
Concrete cover = 25mm
Overall depth = d + + concrete cover = 170 + 7 + 25 = 202mm
Use D = 220mm
d = 220 – 7 – 25 = 188mm
=
59
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
Design actions:
Design moment = 55.142KNm
Design shear = 46.32KN
5wL4
Since W= 21.6KN/m , max =14.64 =14.64 mm
384 EI
L= 4.80m
E = 29Gpa
I = 0.0004m4
But, according to EBCS-2, section 5.2.2, the final deflection shall not exceed the value
Le = 4.8/200 = 24 mm
200
Since the actual deflection is less than the recommended value (14.64mm < 24 mm), then it is safe.
Before we go to reinforcement calculation, it is better to check the shear capacity of the section.
60
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
= 0.25*1000*1.085*1.412*1.5*0.188
Reinforcement Calculation
b = width
d = depth
61
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
Minimum reinforcement
Asmin = ρmin.bd
62
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
CHAPTER FIVE
= (T1) W
Where,
=base shear
(T1)=αβγ
Where, α= ratio of the design bed rock acceleration to the acceleration of gravity, g. It is
given by:
α=
Where, = the bed rock acceleration ratio for the site and depends on the seismic zone.
=1.2S/
Where, S=site coefficient of soil characteristics
63
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
T1= the fundamental period of vibration of the structure (in seconds) for translational
motion in the direction of the motion. For structures up to 80m height, the value of T1 may be
approximated by
T1=C1
Where, H=Height of the structure above the base in meter=22.5m
C1=0.075 for RC moment resisting frames and eccentrically braced steel frame.
T1=0.775sec
γ= ≤ 0.7
Where,
=basic type of behavior factor, dependent on the structural type (EBCS-8, 1995, table 3-
2) =0.2 (For frame system)
=1 (frame system)
=factor reflecting the prevailing failure mode in the structural system with wall
=1 (frame system)
64
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
γ = 0.2*2*1*1 = 0.4
( Fb Ft )Wi hi
Fi n
W h
i 0
i i
Where,
n= number of stories
Ft= is the a concentrated extra force (in addition to Fn) at the top of the
structure accounting whiplash for slender structure, which is given by
Ft= 0
Ft=0.07T1
= 0.07*T* fb = 0.07*0.775* Fb
= 0.05425
65
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
The lumped mass at each floor level was calculated by taking half portion from above and half from
below of the floor.
1. Ground Floor
Height
Designat Unit or Moment
ion Weight/PD Width Length Area Volume Weight Arm Moment
Mx(KN My(KN
3) 2 3
(KN/m (m) Lx Ly (m ) (m ) (KN) Xm Ym m) m)
COLUMN
C1 25 3.00 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.48 12.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
C2 25 3.00 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.48 12.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 60.00
C3 25 3.00 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.48 12.00 9.00 0.00 0.00 108.00
C4 25 3.00 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.48 12.00 14.0 0.00 0.00 168.00
C5 25 3.00 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.48 12.00 0.00 6.00 72.00 0.00
C6 25 3.00 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.48 12.00 5.00 6.00 72.00 60.00
C7 25 3.00 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.48 12.00 9.00 6.00 72.00 108.00
C8 25 3.00 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.48 12.00 14.00 6.00 72.00 168.00
C9 25 3.00 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.48 12.00 20.00 6.00 72.00 240.00
C10 25 3.00 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.48 12.00 0.00 10.00 120.00 0.00
C11 25 3.00 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.48 12.00 5.00 10.00 120.00 60.00
C12 25 3.00 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.48 12.00 9.00 10.00 120.00 108.00
C13 25 3.00 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.48 12.00 14.00 10.00 120.00 168.00
C14 25 3.00 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.48 12.00 20.00 10.00 120.00 240.00
C15 25 3.00 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.48 12.00 0.00 15.00 180.00 0.00
C16 25 3.00 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.48 12.00 5.00 15.00 180.00 60.00
66
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
C17 25 3.00 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.48 12.00 9.00 15.00 180.00 108.00
C18 25 3.00 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.48 12.00 14.00 15.00 180.00 168.00
C19 25 3.00 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.48 12.00 20.00 15.00 180.00 240.00
GROUND BEAMS
1-1 25 20.00 0.30 0.40 0.12 2.40 60.00 10.00 15.00 900.00 600.00
2-2 25 20.00 0.30 0.40 0.12 2.40 60.00 10.00 10.00 600.00 600.00
3-3 25 20.00 0.30 0.40 0.12 2.40 60.00 10.00 6.00 360.00 600.00
4-4 25 14.00 0.30 0.40 0.12 1.68 42.00 7.000 0.00 0.00 294.00
A-A 25 16.50 0.30 0.40 0.12 1.98 49.50 0.00 10.00 495.00 0.00
B-B 25 16.50 0.30 0.40 0.12 1.98 49.50 5.00 10.00 495.00 247.50
C-C 25 15.00 0.30 0.40 0.12 1.80 45.00 9.00 7.50 337.50 405.00
D-D 25 15.00 0.30 0.40 0.12 1.80 45.00 14.00 7.50 337.50 630.00
E-E 25 10.50 0.30 0.40 0.12 1.26 31.50 20.00 7.50 236.25 630.00
GROUND SLAB
S1 20.00 0.12 5.00 5.00 25.00 3.00 60.00 2.50 16.50 990.00 150.00
S2 20.00 0.12 4.00 5.00 20.00 2.40 48.00 7.00 16.50 792.00 336.00
S3 20.00 0.12 5.00 5.00 25.00 3.00 60.00 11.50 16.50 990.00 690.00
S4 20.00 0.12 6.00 5.00 30.00 3.60 72.00 17.00 16.50 1188.00 1224.00
S5 20.00 0.12 4.00 4.00 16.00 1.92 38.40 7.00 8.00 307.20 268.80
S6 20.00 0.12 5.00 4.00 20.00 2.40 48.00 11.50 8.00 384.00 552.00
67
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
S7 20.00 0.12 6.00 4.00 24.00 2.88 57.60 17.00 8.00 460.80 979.20
S8 20.00 0.12 5.00 6.00 30.00 3.60 72.00 2.50 3.00 216.00 180.00
S9 20.00 0.12 4.00 6.00 24.00 2.88 57.60 7.00 3.00 172.80 403.20
S10 20.00 0.12 5.00 6.00 30.00 3.60 72.00 11.50 3.00 216.00 828.00
PARTITION WALL
W1 14 1.40 0.2 9.95 13.93 2.79 39.06 0.00 8.25 322.25 0.00
W2 10 1.40 0.10 3.80 5.32 0.53 5.30 3.33 1.90 10.07 17.65
W3 10 1.40 0.20 5.75 8.05 1.61 16.10 7.00 0.00 0.00 112.70
W4 10 1.40 0.10 2.00 2.80 0.28 2.80 4.00 2.50 7.00 11.20
W5 10 1.40 0.10 3.80 5.32 0.53 5.30 5.00 1.90 10.07 26.50
W6 10 1.40 0.10 3.80 5.32 0.53 5.30 6.50 1.90 10.07 34.45
W7 10 1.40 0.10 1.40 1.96 0.20 2.00 7.60 2.50 5.00 14.90
W8 10 1.40 0.10 1.40 1.96 0.20 2.00 8.00 2.50 5.00 15.68
W9 10 1.40 0.10 3.80 5.32 0.53 5.32 13.00 1.90 10.11 69.16
W10 10 1.40 0.10 3.80 5.32 0.53 5.32 15.00 1.90 10.11 79.80
W11 14 1.40 0.20 5.60 7.84 1.57 21.95 14.00 2.80 61.46 307.30
W12 10 1.40 0.10 2.26 3.16 0.32 3.16 1.13 3.76 11.88 3.57
W13 10 1.40 0.10 2.00 2.80 0.28 2.80 3.33 4.76 13.33 9.32
W14 14 1.40 0.20 17.20 24.08 4.82 67.42 6.00 8.60 579.8 404.52
W15 14 1.40 0.20 16.24 22.74 4.55 63.66 8.12 8.00 509.3 516.92
W16 14 1.40 0.20 2.00 2.80 0.56 7.84 5.00 7.00 54.88 39.20
68
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
W17 10 1.40 0.10 2.00 2.80 0.28 2.80 3.70 9.00 25.20 10.36
W18 10 1.40 0.10 1.60 2.24 0.22 2.24 5.00 9.20 20.61 11.20
W19 10 1.40 0.10 2.97 4.16 0.42 4.16 1.49 10.00 41.60 6.20
W20 14 1.40 0.20 2.10 2.94 0.59 8.26 3.00 11.95 98.71 24.78
W21 10 1.40 0.10 3.95 5.53 0.553 5.53 1.96 13.00 71.89 10.84
W22 14 1.40 0.20 5.20 7.28 1.46 20.38 2.60 16.50 336.3 52.99
W23 14 1.40 0.20 1.50 2.10 0.42 5.88 5.00 15.75 92.61 29.40
W24 10 1.40 0.10 2.00 2.80 0.28 2.80 11.38 9.00 25.20 31.86
W25 10 1.40 0.10 1.60 2.24 0.22 2.24 14.00 8.80 19.71 31.36
W26 10 1.40 0.10 1.10 1.54 0.15 1.54 12.55 10.00 15.40 19.33
W27 14 1.40 0.20 8.20 11.48 2.29 32.14 15.90 12.10 388.9 511.03
W28 10 1.40 0.10 3.00 4.20 0.42 4.20 18.10 9.50 39.90 76.02
W29 10 1.40 0.10 5.10 7.14 0.71 7.14 15.60 11.00 78.54 111.38
W30 10 1.40 0.10 2.78 3.89 0.39 3.89 13.18 13.61 52.94 51.27
W31 14 1.40 0.20 5.50 7.70 1.54 21.56 10.00 15.00 323.4 215.60
SUM 12729.
1408.2 3 12442.8
69
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
C1 25 3.00 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.48 12.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
C2 25 3.00 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.48 12.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 60.00
C3 25 3.00 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.48 12.00 9.00 0.00 0.00 108.00
C4 25 3.00 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.48 12.00 14.0 0.00 0.00 168.00
C5 25 3.00 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.48 12.00 0.00 6.00 72.00 0.00
C6 25 3.00 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.48 12.00 5.00 6.00 72.00 60.00
C7 25 3.00 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.48 12.00 9.00 6.00 72.00 108.00
C8 25 3.00 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.48 12.00 14.00 6.00 72.00 168.00
C9 25 3.00 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.48 12.00 20.00 6.00 72.00 240.00
C10 25 3.00 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.48 12.00 0.00 10.00 120.00 0.00
C11 25 3.00 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.48 12.00 5.00 10.00 120.00 60.00
C12 25 3.00 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.48 12.00 9.00 10.00 120.00 108.00
C13 25 3.00 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.48 12.00 14.00 10.00 120.00 168.00
C14 25 3.00 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.48 12.00 20.00 10.00 120.00 240.00
C15 25 3.00 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.48 12.00 0.00 15.00 180.00 0.00
C16 25 3.00 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.48 12.00 5.00 15.00 180.00 60.00
C17 25 3.00 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.48 12.00 9.00 15.00 180.00 108.00
C18 25 3.00 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.48 12.00 14.00 15.00 180.00 168.00
C19 25 3.00 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.48 12.00 20.00 15.00 180.00 240.00
SUM 228.0 1320.0 1896.0
70
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
GIRDER BEAMS
1-1 25 20.00 0.30 0.40 0.12 2.40 60.00 10.00 15.00 900.00 600.00
2-2 25 20.00 0.30 0.40 0.12 2.40 60.00 10.00 10.00 600.00 600.00
3-3 25 20.00 0.30 0.40 0.12 2.40 60.00 10.00 6.00 360.00 600.00
4-4 25 14.00 0.30 0.40 0.12 1.68 42.00 7.000 0.00 0.00 294.00
A-A 25 16.50 0.30 0.40 0.12 1.98 49.50 0.00 10.00 495.00 0.00
B-B 25 16.50 0.30 0.40 0.12 1.98 49.50 5.00 10.00 495.00 247.50
C-C 25 15.00 0.30 0.40 0.12 1.80 45.00 9.00 7.50 337.50 405.00
D-D 25 15.00 0.30 0.40 0.12 1.80 45.00 14.00 7.50 337.50 630.00
E-E 25 10.50 0.30 0.40 0.12 1.26 31.50 20.00 7.50 236.25 630.00
RIBBED SLAB
S1 20.00 0.22 5.00 5.00 25.00 5.50 110.00 2.50 16.50 1815.00 275.00
S2 20.00 0.22 4.00 5.00 20.00 4.40 88.00 7.00 16.50 1452.00 616.00
S3 20.00 0.22 5.00 5.00 25.00 5.50 110.00 11.50 16.50 1815.00 1265.00
S4 20.00 0.22 6.00 5.00 30.00 6.60 132.00 17.00 16.50 2178.00 2244.00
S5 20.00 0.22 4.00 4.00 16.00 3.52 70.40 7.00 8.00 563.20 492.80
S6 20.00 0.22 5.00 4.00 20.00 4.40 88.00 11.50 8.00 704.00 1012.00
S7 20.00 0.22 6.00 4.00 24.00 5.28 105.60 17.00 8.00 844.80 1795.20
S8 20.00 0.22 5.00 6.00 30.00 6.60 132.00 2.50 3.00 396.00 330.00
S9 20.00 0.22 4.00 6.00 24.00 5.28 105.60 7.00 3.00 316.80 739.20
S10 20.00 0.22 5.00 6.00 30.00 6.60 132.00 11.50 3.00 396.00 1518.00
C1 25.00 0.15 5.00 1.50 7.50 1.125 28.125 2.50 15.75 442.97 70.31
C2 25.00 0.15 2.00 1.50 3.00 0.45 11.25 14.00 15.75 177.19 157.50
71
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
C2 25.00 0.15 2.00 1.50 3.00 0.45 11.25 -0.75 14.00 157.50 -8.44
C2 25.00 0.15 2.00 1.50 3.00 0.45 11.25 -0.75 5.00 56.25 -8.44
C2 25.00 0.15 2.00 1.50 3.00 0.45 11.25 1.00 -0.75 -8.44 11.25
C2 25.00 0.15 2.00 1.50 3.00 0.45 11.25 11.00 -0.75 -8.44 123.75
C4 25.00 0.15 5.00 2.00 10.00 1.50 37.50 9.00 2.50 93.75 337.50
PARTITION WALL
W1 14 2.80 0.2 9.95 27.86 5.57 77.98 0.00 8.25 643.34 0.00
W2 10 2.80 0.10 3.80 10.64 1.06 10.60 3.33 1.90 20.14 35.30
W3 10 2.80 0.20 5.75 16.10 3.22 32.20 7.00 0.00 0.00 225.40
W4 10 2.80 0.10 2.00 5.60 0.56 5.60 4.00 2.50 14.00 22.40
W5 10 2.80 0.10 3.80 10.64 1.06 10.60 5.00 1.90 20.14 53.00
W6 10 2.80 0.10 3.80 10.64 1.06 10.60 6.50 1.90 20.14 68.90
W7 10 2.80 0.10 1.40 3.92 0.40 4.00 7.60 2.50 10.00 29.80
W8 10 2.80 0.10 1.40 3.92 0.40 4.00 8.00 2.50 10.00 31.36
W9 10 2.80 0.10 3.80 10.64 1.06 10.64 13.00 1.90 20.22 138.32
W10 10 2.80 0.10 3.80 10.64 1.06 10.64 15.00 1.90 20.22 159.60
W11 14 2.80 0.20 5.60 15.68 3.14 43.90 14.00 2.80 122.9 614.60
W12 10 2.80 0.10 2.26 6.32 0.64 6.32 1.13 3.76 23.76 7.14
W13 10 2.80 0.10 2.00 5.60 0.56 5.60 3.33 4.76 26.66 18.65
W14 14 2.80 0.20 17.20 48.16 9.68 134.84 6.00 8.60 809.0 809.04
W15 14 2.80 0.20 16.24 45.48 9.10 127.32 8.12 8.00 1018 1033.8
W16 14 2.80 0.20 2.00 5.60 1.12 15.68 5.00 7.00 109.8 78.40
W17 10 2.80 0.10 2.00 5.60 0.56 5.60 3.70 9.00 50.40 20.72
72
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
W18 10 2.80 0.10 1.60 4.48 0.44 4.48 5.00 9.20 41.22 22.40
W19 10 2.80 0.10 2.97 8.32 0.84 8.32 1.49 10.00 83.20 12.40
W20 14 2.80 0.20 2.10 5.88 1.18 16.52 3.00 11.95 197.4 49.56
W21 10 2.80 0.10 3.95 11.06 1.11 11.06 1.96 13.00 143.8 21.68
W22 14 2.80 0.20 5.20 14.56 2.92 40.76 2.60 16.50 672.6 105.98
W23 14 2.80 0.20 1.50 4.20 0.84 11.76 5.00 15.75 185.2 58.80
W24 10 2.80 0.10 2.00 5.60 0.56 5.60 11.38 9.00 50.40 63.72
W25 10 2.80 0.10 1.60 4.48 0.44 4.48 14.00 8.80 39.42 62.72
W26 10 2.80 0.10 1.10 3.08 0.30 3.08 12.55 10.00 30.80 38.66
W27 14 2.80 0.20 8.20 22.96 4.58 64.28 15.90 12.10 777.8 1022.1
W28 10 2.80 0.10 3.00 8.40 0.84 8.40 18.10 9.50 79.80 152.04
W29 10 2.80 0.10 5.10 14.28 1.42 14.28 15.60 11.00 157.1 222.76
W30 10 2.80 0.10 2.78 7.78 0.78 7.78 13.18 13.61 105.9 102.54
W31 14 2.80 0.20 5.50 15.40 3.08 43.12 10.00 15.00 646.8 431.20
W32 10 2.80 0.10 2.00 5.60 0.56 5.60 18.28 9.00 50.40 102.37
73
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
Roof
Description Unit Weight Length or Width Area Volume Weight Xm Ym Mx My
2 3
(Dead load) (m) (m ) (m ) (KN) (m) (m) (KNm) (KNm)
DUO-PITCHED
MONO PITCHED
74
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
COLUMN
C1 25 1.50 0.20 0.30 0.06 0.09 2.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
C2 25 1.50 0.20 0.30 0.06 0.09 2.25 5.00 0.00 0.00 11.25
C3 25 1.50 0.20 0.30 0.06 0.09 2.25 9.00 0.00 0.00 20.25
C4 25 1.50 0.20 0.30 0.06 0.09 2.25 14.0 0.00 0.00 31.50
C5 25 1.50 0.20 0.30 0.06 0.09 2.25 0.00 6.00 13.50 0.00
C6 25 1.50 0.20 0.30 0.06 0.09 2.25 5.00 6.00 13.50 11.25
C7 25 1.50 0.20 0.30 0.06 0.09 2.25 9.00 6.00 13.50 20.25
C8 25 1.50 0.20 0.30 0.06 0.09 2.25 14.00 6.00 13.50 31.50
C9 25 1.50 0.20 0.30 0.06 0.09 2.25 20.00 6.00 13.50 45.00
C10 25 1.50 0.20 0.30 0.06 0.09 2.25 0.00 10.00 22.50 0.00
C11 25 1.50 0.20 0.30 0.06 0.09 2.25 5.00 10.00 22.50 11.25
C12 25 1.50 0.20 0.30 0.06 0.09 2.25 9.00 10.00 22.50 20.25
C13 25 1.50 0.20 0.30 0.06 0.09 2.25 14.00 10.00 22.50 31.50
C14 25 1.50 0.20 0.30 0.06 0.09 2.25 20.00 10.00 22.50 45.00
C15 25 1.50 0.20 0.30 0.06 0.09 2.25 0.00 15.00 33.75 0.00
C16 25 1.50 0.20 0.30 0.06 0.09 2.25 5.00 15.00 33.75 11.25
C17 25 1.50 0.20 0.30 0.06 0.09 2.25 9.00 15.00 33.75 20.25
C18 25 1.50 0.20 0.30 0.06 0.09 2.25 14.00 15.00 33.75 31.50
C19 25 1.50 0.20 0.30 0.06 0.09 2.25 20.00 15.00 33.75 45.00
75
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
C1 25 1.80 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.288 7.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
C2 25 1.80 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.288 7.20 5.00 0.00 0.00 36.00
C3 25 1.80 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.288 7.20 9.00 0.00 0.00 64.80
C4 25 1.80 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.288 7.20 14.0 0.00 0.00 100.80
C5 25 1.80 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.288 7.20 0.00 6.00 43.20 0.00
C6 25 1.80 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.288 7.20 5.00 6.00 43.20 36.00
C7 25 1.80 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.288 7.20 9.00 6.00 43.20 64.80
C8 25 1.80 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.288 7.20 14.00 6.00 43.20 100.80
C9 25 1.80 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.288 7.20 20.00 6.00 43.20 144.00
C10 25 1.80 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.288 7.20 0.00 10.00 72.00 0.00
C11 25 1.80 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.288 7.20 5.00 10.00 72.00 36.00
C12 25 1.80 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.288 7.20 9.00 10.00 72.00 64.80
C13 25 1.80 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.288 7.20 14.00 10.00 72.00 100.80
C14 25 1.80 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.288 7.20 20.00 10.00 72.00 144.00
C15 25 1.80 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.288 7.20 0.00 15.00 108.00 0.00
C16 25 1.80 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.288 7.20 5.00 15.00 108.00 36.00
C17 25 1.80 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.288 7.20 9.00 15.00 108.00 64.80
C18 25 1.80 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.288 7.20 14.00 15.00 108.00 100.80
C19 25 1.80 0.4 0.4 0.16 0.288 7.20 20.00 15.00 108.00 144.00
SUM 136.8 1116.0 1238.4
76
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
Ft=0.05425
= 79.23 ≤ 178.10
77
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
- Ft
Xm=∑ wi*Xi/ (∑ w)
Ym=∑ wi*Yi/ (∑ w)
78
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
320 4 1500 1650 1500 1700 1000 900 700X2000 1500 3600
480 6 1700 1850 1700 1800 1050 1200 800X2000 1500 3600
640 8 1700 1850 1780 1950 1100 1400 800X2000 1500 3600
79
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF(G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
From the above table data, we have just selected the following dimensions.
No of person to accommodate =6
80
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF (G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
The wall is designed as isolated sway elements of a frame using the second –order theory of columns.
/refer: EBCS-2, 1995.section 4.4 /
The lateral load due to seismic action and the vertical loads from self-weight of the elevator car, top slab
& from live load can be determined.
= (T1) W
Where:
=base shear
(T1)=αβγ
Where: α= ratio of the design bed rock acceleration to the acceleration of gravity, which is given by: α
=
Where:
= The bed rock acceleration ratio for the site and depends on the seismic zone.
81
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF (G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
=1.2S/
Where:
T1= the fundamental period of vibration of the structure (in seconds) for translational motion in the
direction of the motion. For structures up to 80m height, the value of T1 may be approximated by:
T1=C1
Where:
b=0.15m
for structures with concrete or masonry shear walls, the value of may be taken as:
Where:
82
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF (G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
=combined effective area of the shear in the first story of the building, in m2
=length of the shear wall in the first story in the direction parallel to the applied forces, in meters
with the restriction that Lwi/H shall not exceed 0.9. =2m
Ac = 0.218m2
Lwi = 1.80m
AA = AC = 0.15*1.5 = 0.225m2
Ac=0.252 m2
83
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF (G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
= 1.022 ≤ 2.5………Ok!
γ= ≤ 0.7
Where:
=basic type of behavior factor, dependent on the structural type (EBCS-8, 1995, table 3-2)
=factor reflecting the prevailing failure mode in the structural system with wall= 1
γ = 0.2 ≤ 0.7………Ok!
= 0.1*1.022*0.2= 0.0204
W=seismic DL, obtained as the total permanent load plus 25% of the floor live load, for storage and
ware house occupancies. In other occupancies, no allowance for live loads need be made. In our case we
assumed that the elevator car is being there throughout & it always serves, hence it can be considered as
storage occupancies to account the 25% allowance for live loads.
84
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF (G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
Since T1=1.554sec
Ft=0.07 T1
= 0.07*1.794*fb ≤ 0.25
= 0.126*fb
SW1(A) 25 1.80 0.15 1.50 0.23 0.54 13.5 0.90 1.725 23.30 12.15
SW2(B) 25 1.80 0.15 1.80 0.27 0.65 16.3 0.075 0.90 14.67 14.67
SW3(C) 25 1.80 0.15 1.50 0.23 0.50 13.5 0.825 0.075 1.01 1.01
SW4(D) 25 1.80 0.15 0.40 0.06 0.144 3.60 1.725 0.20 0.72 6.21
SW5(E) 25 1.80 0.15 0.40 0.06 0.144 3.60 1.725 0.02 0.72 6.21
GROUND FLOOR
SW1(A) 25 3.00 0.15 1.50 0.23 0.69 17.3 0.90 1.725 29.84 15.57
SW2(B) 25 3.00 0.15 1.80 0.27 0.81 20.3 0.075 0.90 18.27 1.53
SW3(C) 25 3.00 0.15 1.50 0.23 0.69 17.3 0.825 0.075 1.30 14.27
SW4(D) 25 3.00 0.15 0.40 0.06 0.18 4.50 1.725 0.20 0.90 7.76
SW5(E) 25 3.00 0.15 0.40 0.06 0.18 4.50 1.725 0.02 0.90 7.76
85
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF (G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
SW1(A) 25 3.00 0.15 1.50 0.23 0.69 17.3 0.90 1.725 29.84 15.57
SW2(B) 25 3.00 0.15 1.80 0.27 0.81 20.3 0.075 0.90 18.27 1.53
SW3(C) 25 3.00 0.15 1.50 0.23 0.69 17.3 0.825 0.075 1.30 14.27
SW4(D) 25 3.00 0.15 0.40 0.06 0.18 4.50 1.725 0.20 0.90 7.76
SW5(E) 25 3.00 0.15 0.40 0.06 0.18 4.50 1.725 0.02 0.90 7.76
ROOF FLOOR
SW1(A) 25 2.2 0.15 1.50 0.23 0.51 12.75 0.90 1.725 22.00 11.48
SW2(B) 25 2.2 0.15 1.80 0.27 0.59 14.75 0.075 0.90 13.28 11.06
SW3(C) 25 2.2 0.15 1.50 0.23 0.51 12.75 0.825 0.075 0.96 10.52
SW4(D) 25 2.2 0.15 0.40 0.06 0.13 3.25 1.725 0.20 0.65 5.61
SW5(E) 25 2.2 0.15 0.40 0.06 0.13 3.25 1.725 0.02 0.65 5.61
W = 544.35KN + 5KN/m2*(1.5m*1.5m)*25%
W = 547.16KN
86
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF (G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
Fb = (T1)*W = 0.0204W
= 0.0204*547.16 = 11.162KN
Ft=0.07 T1
= 0.07*1.794*fb ≤ 0.25
= 0.126*fb = 0.126*11.162 = 1.41 KN
Distribution of horizontal seismic forces to each story
The base shear force is distributed over the height of the structure at each floor level according to the
following formula:
( Fb Ft )Wi hi
Fi n
W h
i 0
i i
Story Shear
- Ft
87
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF (G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
d= , where Le = 1500mm
= 33
d = 38.64mm
Load calculation
Dead load
From self-weight of elevator car =(2*320*9.81*10-3)/(1.8*1.8) =1.938KN/m2
Total dead load excluding self weight of the elevator car = 3.75 +0.575 +0.32 +0.69 =5.335 KN/m2
Pd = 1.3*5.335 + 1.6*5 = 14.94 KN/m2(excluding elevator car weight)
88
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF (G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
Therefore, we simply distribute the load from the elevator car on the area of the slab
Where
And for slabs simply supported in all four sides (PCT = 1) and with span ratio of 1.0 and the value of
moment coefficients will be as follows:
= 0.024
= 0.024
89
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF (G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
= 0.024*17.50*1.82 = 1.40KN.m
= 0.024*17.50*1.82 = 1.40KN.m
Depth requirement for ultimate flexural strength of concrete compression stress capacity
d ≥ √M/0.2952fcdbw = √(1.40*106)/0.2952*11.33*1000
= {1 – [1 -2*1.4*106/(1000*782*11.33)]0.5 = 0.0009
= 132.60mm2
Based on the coefficient method for two way solid slabs the values of shear distribution factors are as
given below:
= 0.33*17.50*1.80 = 10.395KN/m
= 0.33*17.50*1.80 = 10.395KN/m
90
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF (G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
Hence the total vertical loads at the bottom of shear walls become:
91
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF (G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
etot = ea + eo + e2
Accidental (additional) eccentricity due to various imperfections
Where: Le = is effective buckling length of the wall and assuming the top end of the shear wall to be
simply supported.
= 0.7*25 = 17.50m
92
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF (G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
Total eccentricity:
eo = Md/ Nsd = 0
Second order eccentricity:
Total eccentricity:
Equivalent eccentricity:
eequ = etot(1+kα) =
93
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF (G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
V = 0.051
= 0.06
Area of reinforcement:
Therefore, using two rows of bars (That is providing reinforcement at each face or internal and external
face) of the wall. The area of steel reinforcement on each side wall will be:
As = 3518mm2/2 = 1759mm2
- The diameter of the vertical bars should not be less than 8mm
- The spacing of vertical bars should not exceed twice the wall thickness nor 300mm
Therefore, provide two Ф14 C/C 150mm vertical reinforcement bars on each face of the wall.
94
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF (G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
=688.30 KN ≥ Vd = 9.80KN………..OK!
VC = 0.25fctd k1 k2 bw d + Vcn
= 14.06KN
= 1 + 50*0.015
= 1.75
VC = 169.60KN ≥ 9.80KN………OK
According to EBCS-2 section 6.2.1.2 the area of horizontal reinforcement shall not be less than one-half
of the vertical reinforcement
Therefore, provide two stirrups and the area of shear reinforcement will be
As = 3518mm2÷ 4 = 879.50mm2
The diameter of the horizontal bars shall not be less than one quarter of the vertical reinforcement bars.
NOTE: The design of the other shear wall sides will be done as the above procedures.
95
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF (G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
Chapter 6
Beams are flexural members which are used to transfer the loads from slab to columns. Basically beams
should be designed for flexure (moment). Furthermore it is essential to check and design the beam
sections for torsion and shear..
In our case a particular beam axis is selected for design. The following output data is taken from 3-D
analysis of the frame using ETABS.
96
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF (G+6) URBAN BUILDING DESIGN 2016
The final design of a structure must be for the most unfavorable combination of loads that the structure
is to support. However, some judgment is necessary in selecting loading conditions that can reasonably
be combined. The load combinations that must be considered are normally specified in codes and
standards(Ethiopian building code )
The output is shown only for severe maximum and severe minimum, which were used as basis for
design of the frame elements. Hence output shows the envelope for the desired action. For sake of
clarity and readability the loading and analysis results are presented in sample graphicall
97
Structural Design of G+6 Urban Building Design, 2016.
98
Structural Design of G+6 Urban Building Design, 2016.
99
Structural Design of G+6 Urban Building Design, 2016.
100
Structural Design of G+6 Urban Building Design, 2016.
101
Structural Design of G+6 Urban Building Design, 2016.
102
Structural Design of G+6 Urban Building Design, 2016.
103
Structural Design of G+6 Urban Building Design, 2016.
104
Structural Design of G+6 Urban Building Design, 2016.
105
Structural Design of G+6 Urban Building Design, 2016.
106
Structural Design of G+6 Urban Building Design, 2016.
107
Structural Design of G+6 Urban Building Design, 2016.
108
Structural Design of G+6 Urban Building Design, 2016.
109
Structural Design of G+6 Urban Building Design, 2016.
110
Structural Design of G+6 Urban Building Design, 2016.
SUMMARY OF SAMPLE BEAM ANALYSIS RESULT FOR CRITICAL SECTIONS ALONG Y- DIRECTION
4 - -69.4 - 103.98
4 - -67.70 - 145.00
SUMMARY OF SAMPLE BEAM ANALYSIS RESULT FOR CRITICAL SECTIONS ALONG X-DIRECTION
111
Structural Design of G+6 Urban Building Design, 2016.
0.6
ρmin = 0.6 / 300 0.002
fyk
0.3 d = 0.265m m
0.7
Negative Moment 99.95 KN-m
Positive Moment 108.2 KN-m
Shear 176 KN
112
Structural Design of G+6 Urban Building Design, 2016.
Calculate Reinforcement
1 é 2 mR n ù m
f yd
Rn
M u
req ê1 1 ú f cd 2
m ëê f yd úû bd
m = 23.02 m = 23.02
Rn = 2033.2604 Rn = 2201.08
0.0087 0.00947
As = 0.00161 As = 0.00176
As prvd = 0.0004021 As prvd = 0.0003
Capacity = 27.11 Capacity = 20.88
Reserve = -72.88% Reserve = -80.71%
Vs
Vs = 107.38
k1 = 1.108
k2 = 1.335 Use Dia= 8 Av = 0.000101
s = 0.06 m
Vc = 68.62 KN Max S = 0.200 m Use 0.065
113
Structural Design of G+6 Urban Building Design, 2016.
- - - - - - - -
114
Structural Design of G+6 Urban Building Design, 2016.
Support Reinforcement Design for girder beam parallel to Ribs (critical axis)
Span Reinforcement Design for girder beam parallel to Ribs (critical axis)
For the purpose of design calculations, structural members may be classified as Sway or Non-
sway depending on their sensitivity to second order effect due to lateral displacements.
Our code EBCS 2, 1995 suggests that a frame may be classified as non sway for a given
N sd
load case if the critical load ratio for that load case satisfied the criteria:
N cr
115
Structural Design of G+6 Urban Building Design, 2016.
N sd
0.1 (EBCS-2, 1995, Art 4.4.4.2 (3)),
N cr
Ncr - critical value (critical buckling load) for the failure in sway mode
The buckling load of a story may be assumed to be equal to that of substitute beam
column frame defined in the figure4.6 EBCS 2, 1995 and may be determined from the
equation
2 EI e
N cr 2
EBCS-2, 1995, Art 4.4.12 (1)
Le
The effective stiffness EIe may be taken as EIe = 0.2EcIc + EsIs EBCS-2, 1995, Art
4.4.12(2)
Where Ec = 1100fcd
The effective length of a column (Le) may be defend as that height which corresponds to
the height of a pin ended column which can carry the same axial load, or alternatively the
effective length or height may be considered as the height between pointes of contra
flexural of the buckling column
According to EBCS-2, 1995 art 4.4.7.1 the effective buckling length of a compression
member in a given plane may be obtained from the following
116
Structural Design of G+6 Urban Building Design, 2016.
Le
Or conservatively 1 0.8am 1.15
L
> 0.7
k2
k1 kc kc a1 a2
a2 a2 am
k11 k12 k 21 k 22 2
117
Structural Design of G+6 Urban Building Design, 2016.
N sd
If 0.1 (EBCS-2, 1995) => non sway frame (i.e ignore the pΔ(second order effect )
N cr
2 EIe
Ncr
Le 2
5. Slenderness analysis,
M1
a) Calculate Limiting slenderness ratio max 50 25 for non-sway frames and
M2
15
greater of max 25 & max for sway frames
vd
b) Calculate Slenderness ratio of isolated column due to cross section λ=Le/i ,
Le m 0.4
effective buckling length (Le) calculated as 0.70 for non-sway
L m 0.8
Le
mode and 1 0.8 m 1.15 sway mode, where
L
1 2 K1 Kc K Kc
m , 1 , 2 2
2 K11 K12 K 21 K 22
If λmax<< λ it is long column (slender column) and failed by buckling. In this case
we have to consider buckling effect (i.e second order effect.) and if λmax>> λ it is
short column (non slender column) and it failed by crushing.
6. Find total eccentricity and design load calculation
Le
Additional eccentricity ea 20mm
300
7. Reinforcement calculation
118
Structural Design of G+6 Urban Building Design, 2016.
We have designed the column based of EBCS2, 1995. For this case we will present the
sample column design for column 11 (at axis (D, 4)
19 columns to be designed and obtained from (ETABS-2015) under COMB-7
NO STORY JOI.LABEL UN.NAME CASE Fz
COMB7
1 BASE 61 252 Max 1279.178
COMB7
2 BASE 63 81 Max 1566.418
COMB7
3 BASE 65 79 Max 1594.724
COMB7
4 BASE 66 77 Max 1930.632
COMB7
5 BASE 67 75 Max 1200.896
COMB7
6 BASE 76 84 Max 1320.257
COMB7
7 BASE 77 86 Max 1702.995
COMB7
8 BASE 78 88 Max 1781.058
COMB7
9 BASE 79 73 Max 1448.708
COMB7
10 BASE 88 144 Max 1266.985
COMB7
11 BASE 89 176 Max 1656.618
COMB7
12 BASE 90 152 Max 1741.958
COMB7
13 BASE 91 160 Max 1958.579
COMB7
14 BASE 92 168 Max 2283.133
COMB7
15 BASE 93 184 Max 1089.361
COMB7
16 BASE 94 192 Max 2514.677
COMB7
17 BASE 95 200 Max 2456.078
COMB7
18 BASE 96 208 Max 2155.015
119
Structural Design of G+6 Urban Building Design, 2016.
COMB7
19 BASE 97 216 Max 1405.496
120
Structural Design of G+6 Urban Building Design, 2016.
COMB7
18 BASE 96 208 Max 1200.896 C4
COMB7
19 BASE 97 216 Max 1089.361 C4
- -
STORY1 C27 161 COMB1 2514.68 4.9792 9.3912 6.4869 -3.5318
-
STORY2 C27 167 COMB1 2379.16 1.5721 11.6444 16.1273 -1.7219
-
STORY3 C27 166 COMB1 1987.94 7.4241 13.366 20.773 11.1113
-
STORY4 C27 165 COMB1 1600.04 7.5669 12.1822 18.2285 11.0451
-
STORY5 C27 164 COMB1 1213.32 8.2132 12.3193 18.5385 12.1489
-
STORY6 C27 163 COMB1 827.671 8.6247 11.6284 17.7933 12.8515
-
STORY7 C27 162 COMB1 443.184 9.2063 13.4751 18.9938 13.6045
STORY7- -
1 C27 210 COMB1 57.0716 4.3407 4.1201 10.1997 8.5686
Lc2
h
Lc1
121
Structural Design of G+6 Urban Building Design, 2016.
Material Properties
Concrete - Grade C-25 Steel - Grade S300
[EBCS 2 Table
Fck 20,000 kpa 2.3] Fyk 300,000 kpa
[EBCS 2 Table
Fctk 1,500 kpa 2.4] PSF 1.15
[EBCS 2 Table
PSF 1.5 3.1] Fyd 260,870 kpa
Limits of Slenderness:
122
Structural Design of G+6 Urban Building Design, 2016.
æ M1 ö
50 25çç ÷÷ EBCS - 2, 4.4.6
è M2 ø
M 1
= 0.543
M =
2
M 1 = 0.543
M 2
36.423 36.423
Ag = 0.160
Ig
L
e i = Radius of gyration = Ig = 0.002
i Ag =
0.115
m 0.4
NON-SWAY Le L 0.7L
m 0.8
I c1 L c1 I c 2 L c 2
1
I b1 L b1 I b 2 L b 2
SWAY Le = 1+0.8m L 1.15 L
1 2 I c1 L c1 I c 3 L c 3
2
m I b3 Lb3 I b 4 Lb 4
2
Design Actions:
Calculate Eccentricities in the x-x Direction Calculate Eccentricities in the y-y Direction
e tot e e e a e 2 e tot e e e a e 2
Total = Total =
max of max of
0.6e02 + 0.6e02 +
ee = 0.4e01 ee = 0.4e01
0.4e02 0.4e02
ee = 0.0021 ee = 0.0021
Le Le
200mm 200mm
ea = 300 ea = 300
= 0.02 = 0.02
e2 = 0.02 e2 = 0.01
Nsd = 2514.700KN
Msd x-x = 94.802KN-m
Msd y-y = 92.153KN-m
124
Structural Design of G+6 Urban Building Design, 2016.
Reinforcement Calculation:
INTRPOLATION
0.6 0.4
1.39 1.187
0.7 0.5
Ac fcd
As,tot
f yd
As,tot = 0.008249 m2
Using design templates and according to EBCS-2,1995 we designed critical column C27
Story Column P M2 M3 ɷ As #of bars #of bars
1 C27 2514.70 6.50 -3.53 1.187 8249 17.2 18Ф24
125
Structural Design of G+6 Urban Building Design, 2016.
CHAPTER SEVEN
8. FOUNDATION DESIGN
The approximate contact pressure under a given symmetrical foundation can be obtained from
the flexural formula, provided that the considered load lies within the kern of the footing
126
Structural Design of G+6 Urban Building Design, 2016.
The thickness of a given footing that determined by checking the thickness needed for punching
shear criteria and wide beam shear criteria. The greater of the two governs the depth of the
footing.
Design axial loads and bending moments are obtained from ETABs analysis and the
combinations are selected depending on large reinforcement requirements. The max load and
moment of the footing is as following. And then, we grouped the load in to 4 groups. so we have
4 isolated footing .
127
Structural Design of G+6 Urban Building Design, 2016.
COMB7
15 BASE 93 184 Max 1089.361 -0.8904 -4.3881
COMB7
16 BASE 94 192 Max 2514.677 6.4869 3.5318
COMB7
17 BASE 95 200 Max 2456.078 -1.5197 0.8982
COMB7
18 BASE 96 208 Max 2155.015 -3.5989 -1.4896
COMB7
19 BASE 97 216 Max 1405.496 2.839 4.2094
128
Structural Design of G+6 Urban Building Design, 2016.
COMB7
14 BASE 92 168 Max 1405.496 2.839 4.2094 C3
COMB7
15 BASE 93 184 Max 1320.257 -2.0244 3.4846 C3
COMB7
16 BASE 94 192 Max 1279.178 -2.6645 0.8503 C4
COMB7
17 BASE 95 200 Max 1266.985 5.1983 0.0269 C4
COMB7
18 BASE 96 208 Max 1200.896 3.2306 -3.7843 C4
COMB7
19 BASE 97 216 Max 1089.361 -0.8904 -4.3881 C4
2/3
0.21 f ck
fctd
1.5
4. Reinforcement Calculation
Un factored maximum axial loads and moment transferred from the supper structure for each
categories of footing are summarized as follow
129
Structural Design of G+6 Urban Building Design, 2016.
C-25
S-300
Depth of footing = 2m
7.4.1Maximum Loading
P = 2514.70KN
MX =6.50KNm
MY =3.53 KN
Column dimension=40x40cm
Cover =50mm
130
Structural Design of G+6 Urban Building Design, 2016.
Mx 6.50
ey = ey 0.0022m
P 2850.64
p æ 6e x 6e y ö
all ç1 ÷÷ Where σall is the allowable soil bearing capacity which is taken to be
A çè a b ø
equal to 400Mpa and size of a = b, area of footing A = ab = b2, substituting relevant values:
131
Structural Design of G+6 Urban Building Design, 2016.
Structural design
use concrete strength 25 Mpa
Fcd= 11.333 Mpa
Fctd= 1.167 Mpa
rmin= 0.00200
Steel S-300
2
Vup= 641.67 KN/m
2
Vud= 385.00 KN/m
A) Punching Sheer
d= 0.836
132
Structural Design of G+6 Urban Building Design, 2016.
133
Structural Design of G+6 Urban Building Design, 2016.
Table of Contents
Contents Pages