School Learning Gaps I. Rationale: Department of Education
School Learning Gaps I. Rationale: Department of Education
School Learning Gaps I. Rationale: Department of Education
Department of Education
From nearly the very first week that Philippine schools entered a “new
normal” as response to the COVID-19 pandemic, educators and researchers have
sounded the alarm about its detrimental effects on learning. Almost everything
researchers know about what affects learning—time on task, online learning,
summer learning loss, and chronic absenteeism—indicates that many students will
come in with significant deficits from the 2020-2021 school year.
To address the Learning Gap and to give additional pedagogical time to
teachers for the different learning modalities, the Department of Education issued
DepEd Order No. 012, s. 2021 as amendment to DepEd Order No. 030, s. 2020.
With this Kasiglahan Village Elementary School come up with this General
Plan to address the Learning Gaps.
II. OBJECTIVES STATEMENTS:
Identify the learning gaps of Kasiglahan Village Elementary School,
Identify and evaluate the appropriate methods and describe of the context of
KVES concerning which technology-based strategies might be helpful in
addressing the gaps; and
Provide methods which can then be applied within the KVES's education
system to:
enhance the learning outcomes of the pupils;
provide coverage for as many pupils as possible to impart the
education they desire;
support the instructions of improved learning and teaching
processes; and
improve the learning management system of KVES.
III. PLANNING PROPER:
What Are Learning Gaps?
By definition, learning gaps are the difference between what a student is
expected to have learned by a certain grade level versus what they have actually
learned up to that point. In other words, a student is expected to have acquired a
certain reading level by the time they complete any given grade or school year. If
the student is not able to read books at this skill level by this age, we might
consider a learning gap in reading and comprehension exists.
Why do learning gaps form?
In general, learning gaps are compounding, which can be troublesome for
students beginning to fall behind. But, it's not always easy to identify. As learning
is based on building blocks, pupils are always challenged to expand on topics over
time and apply them to new concepts as they progress. Learning that is achieved at
one grade level serves as the foundation on which the understanding of more
complex ideas and concepts is built. This learning structure grows throughout a
learner's academic career, with new skills developing from the skills the pupil has
already mastered. Not every student learns at the same pace, though – which is
why what starts out as a small learning gap can eventually become a more serious
problem.
How to Identify Learning Gaps?
In order to combat learning gaps brought about by COVID-19, the first step
is learning how to identify them.
By definition, learning gaps are the difference between what a student is
expected to have learned by a certain grade level versus what they have actually
learned up to that point. These gaps are often compounding. This means that if
they are not addressed, students are likely to fall further and further behind because
of the skills and knowledge they’ve missed.
Obviously, this poses a major challenge for both educators and students
alike.
Before addressing learning gaps, you must ask the right questions.
Asking the right questions helps us analyze and organize information. When
determining learning gaps, ask ourselves, your team, and learners’ previous
teachers the following questions throughout the process:
1. Which students need additional assistance?
2. What standards were not covered last quarter (especially to those
whom were under the modular distance learning)?
3. What knowledge and skills can learners build on to succeed moving
forward?
4. What additional professional development is needed for teachers and
learners to be successful?
Address Learning Gaps:
Here are the school’s strategies for grasping what students know and don’t
for the 2020-21 school year, and how to respond.
Learning gaps need to be identified, analyzed, and approached with patience.
Students all have different strengths, and there are many reasons why learning gaps
form to begin with. We believe that personalized instruction is the most effective
way to address these challenges.
Crafting of
Memorandum
SWOT Analysis
Providing Technical
Assistance to teachers
to address the learning
Gaps
Data Gathering
Monitoring and
Evaluation
The Master Teacher crafted the School Memorandum which served as the
basis to address the learning gaps.
Meet learners where they are using SWOT analysis. A good first step
might be to analyze (a) what standards were met prior to distance learning, (b)
what standards were covered during distance learning, and (c) what standards
were not covered.
Collect and collectively use the data. The school should create an opportunity
to engage teacher teams to creates a better environment and a better tool to
actively collect and break down learner’s data in meaningful ways.
Monitoring and Evaluation used to assess the performance of projects,
institutions and programs. Its goal is to improve current and future management
of outputs, outcomes and impact.
Date: __________________________
SCHOOL MEMORANDUM
No. ___ s. 2020
KVES LEARNING GAPS for S.Y. 2020-2021
TO: OICs
Master Teachers
Grade Leaners
Assistant Grade Leaders
Teachers
1. Adherence DepEd Order No. 012, s. 2021 as amendment to DepEd Order No. 030, s. 2020.
Stipulated in paragraph 2; Department of Education issued this order to address the Learning Gap
and to give additional pedagogical time to teachers for the different learning modalities.
2. With this, Kasiglahan Village Elementary School identified ways and means to address the
existing learning gaps of the school. The school therefore crafted a monitoring tool which shall be
used by the school to monitor and address the learning gaps.
3. Attached is the copy of the contextualized Monitoring Tool in Identifying and addressing the
learning Gaps as Enclosure No. 1 in this Memorandum.
SONNY V. MATIAS
Master Teacher II
SWOT Analysis
As a member of the school program, monitoring means a way of tracking major events
and accomplishments of the initiative.
Directions: Examine carefully the given indicators. Put a check mark in the appropriate
column. Write your remarks or comments if necessary.
INDICATORS YES NO REMAR
KS
PLANNING
1.1 Are the goals aligned to the current education thrusts as
described in the SIP/AIP?
1.2 Are the objectives based on sound theory and practice?
1.3 Are the objectives:
1.3.1 specific
1.3.2 measurable
1.3.3 attainable
1.3.4 results-oriented
1.3.5 time-bound
1.4 Are the activities responsive to the identified goal?
1.5 Are the strategies doable?
1.6 Is there collaboration among stakeholders in the preparation
of the plan?
1.7 Is the allocated budget sufficient?
1.8 Are the sponsoring agencies capable of providing the needed
resources?
1.9 Are there resources that support
sustainability of the operations indicated in the plan?
1.10 Has the plan been approved and supported by the top
management?
1.11 Has the plan been updated to address the emerging needs?
II. ADVOCACY
INDICATORS (Pre-Implementation)
2.1 Are the advocacy goals aligned to the Program/Project goals?
2.2 Are the advocacy objectives:
2.2.1 specific
2.2.2 measurable
2.2.3 attainable
2.2.4 result-oriented
2.2.5 time-bound
2.3 Are the advocacy activities responsive to the identified goal?
2.4 Are the advocacy strategies doable?
2.5 Are the necessary resources available?
2.6.1 Internet strategies (website, email, online, e-
publication)
2.6.2 Outreach opportunities
(networking events, conferences, workshops, meetings, trainings,
coursework)
2.6.3 Media vehicles (radio, newsletter, brochure, press
releases, advertisement)
INDICATORS (Post-Implementation)
2.7 Was the advocacy widely disseminated in the:
2.7.1 Division Level
2.7.2 District Level
2.7.3 School Level
2.8 Was the conduct of the advocacy timely?
2.9 Are the advocacy program process and system operating as
planned?
2.10 Did the advocacy strategies entice more involvement
among stakeholders?
2.11 Is the advocacy program appropriate to the target
stakeholders?
2.12 Did the advocacy improve the level of commitment?
2.13 Did it raise the number of pledges of support?
2.14 Is there a proof of support, e.g. MOU, MOA?