Management factors that impede adoption of internal social networks include lack of incentives provided to employees and few employees seeing the technology as useful. Organizational inertia also poses challenges as employees are accustomed to existing ways of working. Technology factors include need for ease of use, relevance of content, and accessibility for adoption to increase.
Red Robin succeeded with internal social networks while NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center failed. Red Robin engaged employees for feedback and improvement, while NASA focused less on organizational culture. Management buy-in and understanding employee needs are key for success.
Management factors that impede adoption of internal social networks include lack of incentives provided to employees and few employees seeing the technology as useful. Organizational inertia also poses challenges as employees are accustomed to existing ways of working. Technology factors include need for ease of use, relevance of content, and accessibility for adoption to increase.
Red Robin succeeded with internal social networks while NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center failed. Red Robin engaged employees for feedback and improvement, while NASA focused less on organizational culture. Management buy-in and understanding employee needs are key for success.
Management factors that impede adoption of internal social networks include lack of incentives provided to employees and few employees seeing the technology as useful. Organizational inertia also poses challenges as employees are accustomed to existing ways of working. Technology factors include need for ease of use, relevance of content, and accessibility for adoption to increase.
Red Robin succeeded with internal social networks while NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center failed. Red Robin engaged employees for feedback and improvement, while NASA focused less on organizational culture. Management buy-in and understanding employee needs are key for success.
Management factors that impede adoption of internal social networks include lack of incentives provided to employees and few employees seeing the technology as useful. Organizational inertia also poses challenges as employees are accustomed to existing ways of working. Technology factors include need for ease of use, relevance of content, and accessibility for adoption to increase.
Red Robin succeeded with internal social networks while NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center failed. Red Robin engaged employees for feedback and improvement, while NASA focused less on organizational culture. Management buy-in and understanding employee needs are key for success.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3
Q1: Identify the management, organization, and
technology factors responsible for impeding adoption of
internal corporate social networks. Management: No matter young or old employees, who were collaborating and doing business in more traditional settings normally need an incentive to use social software. However, majority of the companies are not providing incentives to the employees, there are only 22 percent of the users of the social software believe the technology is useful and necessary to their job. Organization: Those companies that have tried to set up the internal social network have found out that the employees who are used to do business in a certain way and overcoming the organizational inertia can prove difficult. About half of the survey respondents said that internal social networks had a “very little impact” on employee’s retention, the speed of making decision or the reduction of meetings. Technology: To increase the motivation to adopt the social networking technologies, ease of use and increased job efficiency are more important compared to peer pressure. Most of the IT professionals consider their own internal social networks are only average or below average and the biggest reason is low adoption rates of the employees. The content on the networks must be relevant, up-to-date and easy to access. Users prefer to use the network that is more user-friendly rather than difficult to reach. Q2: Compare the experiences for implementing internal social networks of the two organizations. Why was one more successful than the other? What role did management play in this process? - NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center is the example who failed to implement the internal social network. They set up a custom-built enterprise social network called Spacebook, and it is to help small teams to collaborate without e-mailing the larger groups. Spacebook included user profiles, group workspaces like wikis, discussion forum, file sharing and group creation. However, spacebook was failed, and it was due to it is not focus enough on people and the network was not taking into consideration on the organization’s culture and politics. The employees do not realise how the network would help them to do their jobs.
- Red Robin is the one who succeed in implementing the
internal social network. Red Robin is a chain with 355 restaurants, about 20,000 employees working in it. They uses the social networking to give their front-line employees who interact with the customers a greater voice in the company because the CIO of the company believes that engaging the employees would increase employee loyalty and bringing them motivation to work. Red Robin is taking into consideration on the employee’s comments and always improves the company accordingly. Red Robin decided to try Yammer, which is a platform for people to create conversations, perform status updates, upload and share files and set up workgroups for small project teams just like Facebook. It allows the employees to communicate with the high management and receive immediate feedback for improvement. The management must be clear of what is needed by the employees as they are the most important assets to the company because they are the one working and bringing the company towards its goal. Employee’s comments and feeling must be taken into consideration for every decisions making. No matter how good the network and revolution is, if it is not attractive to the employees, it would not be success. Q3: Should all companies implement internal enterprise social networks? Why or why not? Yes, I think all companies should implement internal enterprise social networks. Internal social network is a very useful tool for the companies to reduce expenses, time and improve productivity. People in the company can simply share documents and information online and communicate via this platform, and this help to save time and as well energy compared to the traditional way which is to deliver the hardcopy of the document manually and using phone call which will cost money. Companies should provide incentives to encourage the employee to adopt the new system. I believe that if the employees are clear of what benefits they will receive with the new system, they would be more willing to accept the changes.