Chapter 2 - Systemic Functional Grammar (SFG) .
Chapter 2 - Systemic Functional Grammar (SFG) .
Chapter 2 - Systemic Functional Grammar (SFG) .
https://artisinitiative.org/online-course/online-course-2/unit-1-translating-point-of-view-charlotte-
bosseaux/m2-unit-1-chapter-2-systemic-functional-grammar-sfg/
These variables are typically ‘realised’ by specific elements which perform a related functional role (for more
details on this, see Baker 1992: 15-17).
Halliday’s model also provides a detailed analysis of three interconnected elements of meaning
or metafunctions in a text. These metafunctions are the manifestations in the linguistic system of three general
purposes, which underlie all uses of language:
1. The ideational metafunction which is described as the way in which the information concerning the fictional
world is given. In other words, it is the strand of meaning which transmits an experiential view of the world. It is
realised by the denotational (i.e. ‘content’) component of lexical items. The major lexicogrammatical realisation
of this metafunction is the transitivity system: the process described by the verb, the participants and
circumstances associated with the process. Transitivity is analysed according to:
Processes: material (punch, touch, fall, etc.); mental (like, think, etc.); relational (be, have, etc.); behavioural
(worry, listen, smile, etc.); verbal (say, ask, etc.); existential (there is, etc.).
It is also interesting to see whether this process is expressed as a verb (e.g. The government has raised taxes
this year.) or as a nominalisation: (e.g. This year has seen a rise in taxes.)
Circumstances (adverbial group or preposition): adjuncts of time, place, cause, agent, manner: it is interesting
to look at the position of these circumstantial groups.
Next section describes the interpersonal and textual metafunctions.