Video Search Engine Optimization Using Keyword and Feature
Video Search Engine Optimization Using Keyword and Feature
com
ScienceDirect
Procedia Computer Science 58 (2015) 691 – 697
Abstract
Growth of internet touched upon every sphere of life. Business is no exception to it. More and more companies and
individuals are bringing their business online. Now a days videos are used as a tool to advertise and promote the
business. Enterprises upload relevant videos on such promotional sites so that people can extract the most relevant
video content. Users tend to choose the top ranked and the most viewed videos irrespective of their relevance. So,
the key to provide suitable content is Video Search Engine Optimization (VSEO). This research paper proposes a
method to optimize the video rank by exploiting video search engine’s searching strategy that will eventually lead to
increase in number of views of videos with higher ranks and thus promoting corresponding website for every visit.
For experimental purposes, youtube.com has been considered. To promote white hat SEO, a technique is suggested
that uses keyword tags in title, description and transcript. Ranks of videos are analysed before and after VSEO. The
main idea of the proposed strategy is to select appropriate keyword tags based on navigational search queries,
transactional search queries and informational search queries.
©
© 2015 The Authors.
2015 The Authors.Published
Publishedbyby Elsevier
Elsevier B.V.
B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
Peer-review under responsibility of organizing committee of the Second International Symposium on Computer Vision and the
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Internet(VisionNet’15).
Peer-review under responsibility of organizing committee of the Second International Symposium on Computer Vision and the Internet
(VisionNet’15)
1877-0509 © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Peer-review under responsibility of organizing committee of the Second International Symposium on Computer Vision and the Internet (VisionNet’15)
doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.089
692 Krishna Choudhari and Vinod K Bhalla / Procedia Computer Science 58 (2015) 691 – 697
1. Introduction
There has been a tremendous growth in digital market recently, because of the focus shift to visual content and
video broadcasting for marketing. The increase in the bandwidth provided by the telecom’s Internet Service
Providers (ISPs) has resulted in lag-free billions of hours of videos being watched on various video search websites.
Publishing a video on the internet is the cheapest source of advertisement as compared to conventional TV
advertising campaign. Therefore, many commercial organisations are emerging with their channels on video search
websites where they publish and earn money though the traffic fetched by the video, also it is easy for them to link it
with company’s main website & other social media. By using video search engine we have an option of watching
different videos and whatever we choose to watch fetches suggestions for other related videos. Through video
search engine we can recommend and share videos with our family and friends. These videos become visible to
them in their related videos option. In order to increase the view of videos, producer has to make effort to boost the
ranking of the video, this process is called video engine optimization. Thus higher the rank in the search result, the
more will be the count of visits received, which brings more sales revenue through the website visits. Many believe
that delivering lot of related videos will result in top ranking, but it is true only if the content is purely excellent, it
will get views by people and thus reinforcing the prominence of the content. The videos that are ranked at top in
search results do not only rely on the content but also on content delivery’s right format.
Though creating great content to attract the traffic to your video is the key to get high rank, but if the objective is
to increase the number of views then the content must be helpful to the user, informative, shareable and powerful,
also there are several other techniques that boost the ranking of the video. There are different criteria on which video
search engine searches the video, although these criteria are specific to the search engine provider but there are some
basic criteria which are common to all search engines.
2. Related work
The framework retrieves visual information on the basis of feature extraction that improves the effective search
on video on the basis of frame and image processing of the video. The relevancy of video search can be improved
with the query processing on the basis of metadata about the multimedia1. The keyword from the video on the basis
of speech recognition engine help to understand the working principle of modern video search engine. It focuses on
enabling the jump on the scene of video by querying the keyword to help user to check relevancy of the video and to
save time2. The extraction of keyword which involves image processing techniques to summarize the video content
and other features of media content like thumbnail, subtitle generation, annotation help the learner to know about the
video. As the users tend to watch more relevant videos, this feature helps the engine to achieve more relevancy in its
search operation3. Closed caption and Annotation makes the video more searchable and this was introduced by
Microsoft’s project Tuva4.
x Keyword research
Keyword analysis is the most important part of optimization. Similar to the keyword research for online
marketing by SEOs of websites, one has to target audience of video SEO and have to do research what the audience
will place as keyword inside the search engine. This keyword analysis is provided by some keyword analysis tools
like Google Adwords, Youtube keyword suggestions, query log analysis, etc.
x Video tags
While uploading any video to any video search engine, one should keep that video name relevant to the keyword.
Keeping the different video name like vo231232.mov will create ambiguity to the robot or automatic feature
extraction system of video search engine.
Krishna Choudhari and Vinod K Bhalla / Procedia Computer Science 58 (2015) 691 – 697 693
x Title
Title possesses important meaning in placing a video in the top search results because most of the search engines
search the queries related to the titles. Placing the keyword in the title helps the viewers to click on the video as it
seems to be the most related video according to their search. One should try to keep a title that catches the eye of the
viewer.
x Description
Describing the video is all about creating the interest of the viewer to definitely watch the video. Viewer gets the
idea related to details of the video and thus is deciding factor for the viewer to view that video or not. Also put
information related to the company like location, date of event, name, and phone number. First line of description
should be company’s URL which will help to direct the viewers on to the company’s website. The information
inside the description should not be too large to read as the viewer came to watch your video and not the description
of the video. The first few lines should target the audience and be able to tell what the video is all about.
x Thumbnail
Frames from the videos are treated as thumbnails. These are mostly auto-generated but often custom thumbnail
are preferred. It’s the first look of the video and gives the picture about what’s inside the video. This is a key factor
for inviting the viewer.
x Video Transcript
Many video search engines give the facility to put transcript of the video. Many engines check the transcript to
suggest the related result to the user. It is just like timeline or subtitle of the video so one should also put the
keywords inside the transcript.
x Annotations
Annotations provide facility of embedding external links to your website. It is an important aspect, as it links to
your website and will either be shown during full video length or as per the time of appearance set by the uploader.
Thus if viewer likes your video and decides to go to your website then providing this direct link on the video will
increase the visits to your website.
3.2 Off site optimization: It is done after publishing the video for the public.
x Views
This is main motive of video search engine optimization. After considering rank of the video in the search result,
next factor is views that the video has. Larger the views, larger is the chance of viewer to watch your video and this
invites more traffic to your video.
x Shares
The presence of video on the social networking sites like Facebook, twitter, Google+ will invite more number of
views to you video. Many people don’t go to search engines to watch the videos, they might like to watch those
video that are shared by friends present on some social website.
x Comments
This shows to the search engine that whether the video got attention of the viewer till the end. It also helps the
engine to know that whether the video has appropriate content or not.
x Channel Authority
If all the videos are linked with your channel then people are more likely to subscribe the channel. This also
helps search engine to recognize your video relying on the fact that videos from your channel are mostly authentic.
694 Krishna Choudhari and Vinod K Bhalla / Procedia Computer Science 58 (2015) 691 – 697
During the searching activity, SEO professionals not only concentrate on keywords but also understand that the
behaviour of searching query is equally relevant. The basic three category into which searches are divided are:
5. Methodology
We have proposed this methodology that considerably improves ranking of video in search engine. We studied
different processes of video search engines and their upload strategy, we found out that most of the search engines
have provided almost same features while uploading any video. Analysis of query log help us to identify keyword
tag lists. On the basis of video search engine’s features, we created a feature set. Basic main feature set consist of all
the features {Title, Description, Tags, Thumbnail, Transcription, Annotation, Share, and Comment}.
Feature vector (Fv) = {f1, f2, f3, f4, ..., fn}
Fv = & fi
Keyword set are derived from keyword suggestions by Google, YouTube and keyword suggestion tool.
Keyword set (Ks) = {Kl1, kl2, kl3, . . , kln}
Ks = & kli
We performed the experiment on the basis of 10 video set and collected the result. Among those we took
example of one video which is uploaded with title “video lecture for beginner”.
Ql is the query list that based on psychology of analysis of user search queries.
Ql =
Ql = {Ql1, Ql2, Ql3, …, Qln}
6. Result
Study shows that keyword selection is important. Table 1 shows the Placement of the keyword in the feature
improves the ranking of the video significantly. Table 2 shows ranking of video with different queries. Video
attribute like share and comments helps the search engine to gain the trust for the video.
Table 1: Keylist vs Features Table 2: Query vs Optimize feature set– keyword list
F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 Fs - kl1 Fs – kl2 Fs – kl3 Fs – kl4
Fig 2. (a) shows keyword list kl1 with feature f1 to kl5 with f5, in which keyword list kl3 with feature f5 is result
with most significant improvement in the rank. Decreasing status of the bar graph represents improvement in the
rank.
In Fig 2 (b) the lowest line shows the combination of fully optimized feature set and keyword list k13 which says
that once the combination is established in ranking, then video search engine places that video on the top of pages
even if query changes relevantly.
a b
Fig. 2. (a) Analyse of rank on the basis of keyword list vs feature; (b). Analysis of the different query with optimize
feature set and keyword relation.
References
1. P.Geetha, Vasumathi Narayanan. An Effective Video Search Re-Ranking for Content Based Video Retrieval. IEEE 2011; 55-60.
2. Takahiro Yoshida, Kazuki tada, Seiichiro Hagai. A Keyword Accessible Lecture Video Player and Its Evaluation. IEEE 2003; 610-614.
3. Wen-Hsuan Chang, Jie-Chi Yang, Yu-Chieh Wu. A Keyword-based Video Summarization Learning Platform with Multimodal Surrogates.
IEEE 2011; 37-41.
4. Microsoft Project Tuva, http://research.microsoft.com/apps/tools/tuva/.
5. Word stream http://www.wordstream.com/blog/ws/2012/12/10/three-types-of-search-queries.