Feline Panleukopenia: ABCD Guidelines On Prevention and Management
Feline Panleukopenia: ABCD Guidelines On Prevention and Management
Feline Panleukopenia: ABCD Guidelines On Prevention and Management
net/publication/26251979
CITATIONS READS
142 7,733
16 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Tadeusz Frymus on 08 April 2018.
Clinical signs
The hallmark of FPV infection is diarrhoea,
caused by the shortening of the intestinal villi
due to a loss – sometimes complete – of
epithelial cells.17 The virus replicates in the
rapidly dividing cells of the crypts of
Lieberkühn, impairs regeneration of the
intestinal epithelium and the lesions described
above are the result (Figs 1 and 2). Their severity
correlates with the turnover rate of these cells,
and co-infection with enteric viruses such as
feline coronavirus may aggravate the disease.
Intrauterine or perinatal infection may affect
the central nervous system of the fetus, leading
to cerebellar ataxia and intention tremor in
affected kittens. The FPV feline ataxia syndrome
results from an impaired development of the
a
cerebellum due to lytic virus replication in the
Purkinje cells (Table 1).18,19 FIG 2 (a) Haemorrhagic enteritis is a common
Although FPV affects cats of all ages, kittens feature of feline panleukopenia, leading to the
hallmark clinical manifestation of haemorrhagic
are most susceptible. Mortality rates are high diarrhoea. Courtesy of (a) Marian C Horzinek;
b
– over 90% in kittens (Fig 3). (b) Albert Lloret
Va c c i n a t i o n r e c o m m e n d a t i o n s
General considerations ✜ All kittens should receive FPV vaccines;
Both MLV and inactivated FPV vaccines are available for ✜ At least two doses of vaccine should be administered – the
administration by injection, and both provide solid immunity first at 8–9 weeks of age, and the second 3–4 weeks later (at a
against disease. In healthy cats, protection by MLV vaccines is minimum of 12 weeks of age);
more rapid [EBM grade II].47,48 However, a single dose of an ✜ If prophylactic administration of immunoglobulins is not
inactivated FPV vaccine may quickly induce good antibody possible, additional earlier vaccinations should be considered,
responses in naive cats.49,50 In the field, inactivated vaccines especially if MDA is known or suspected to be poor and/or the
are not popular and have all but disappeared from the market kitten is in a high-risk situation [EBM grade I]. If a kitten is
(eg, in Germany, they are only used in exotic felids). There are vaccinated at or before 4 weeks of age, only an inactivated
no data to suggest that particular vaccine brands are product should be used, and repeat vaccinations
more efficacious than others. can be given at 3–4 week intervals until 12 weeks
Core vaccine
The following considerations may influence the of age;
The ABCD considers
decision about the vaccine type: vaccines that protect against ✜ In circumstances where MDA may have
✜ Modified-live virus vaccines should not be FPV infections as being core. persisted beyond 12 weeks, vaccination at
used in pregnant queens because of the risk of 16–20 weeks of age should be considered. This
placental virus passage and damage to the may apply to kittens in catteries or shelters, and
fetus, especially to the developing to kittens from cats that had previously lived in a
cerebellum.50,51 Though inactivated FPV products low-exposure environment and moved into a high-
are licensed in some countries for use in pregnant risk situation [EBM grade I];23
queens, in general pregnant queens should not be ✜ Adult cats of unknown vaccination status should
vaccinated. receive a single MLV vaccine injection followed by a booster
✜ Modified-live virus vaccines should not be administered 1 year later.
to kittens under 4 weeks of age for the same reason:
the cerebellum is still developing in young neonates.50,51 Booster vaccinations
Cats that had responded to FPV vaccination have been shown
Primary course to maintain a solid immunity for 7 years (probably longer) in the
Kittens from immune queens are protected by MDA in the first absence of any booster vaccination or natural challenge [EBM
weeks of life. However, the time at which a kitten will become grade II].51,38 Nevertheless, the ABCD recommends the following
susceptible to infection and/or can respond to vaccination is revaccination protocol:
unknown; also, there is considerable variation between ✜ All cats should receive a first booster 12 months after
individuals. In general, MDA will have waned by 8–12 weeks of completion of the kitten vaccination course (this will ensure
age to a level that allows an immunological response, and an protection of cats that have not adequately responded to the
initial vaccination at 8–9 weeks of age followed by a second primary course);
injection 3–4 weeks later is commonly recommended. Many ✜ After this first booster, subsequent revaccinations are given
vaccines carry data sheet recommendations to this effect. at intervals of 3 years or longer, unless special conditions apply
However, kittens with poor MDA may be vulnerable (and capable [EBM grade II].
of responding to vaccination) at an earlier age, while others While most cases of panleukopenia are caused by infection
may possess MDA at such high titres that they are incapable of with FPV, the canine parvovirus variants CPV-2a, CPV-2b and
responding to vaccination until some time after 12 weeks of age. CPV-2c, discussed earlier, have infected cats and caused disease.
No single primary vaccination policy will therefore cover all Current FPV vaccines probably afford protection against these
potential situations. The ABCD recommends that: new variants [EBM grade II].52,53
the specific antibody titre, the volume Feline panleukopenia virus has re-emerged
administered, the relative importance of serum
antibodies in controlling the particular
as a major cause of mortality in cats in shelters
infection, and the timing of administration. and rescue homes.
Products containing highly concentrated
immunoglobulins are available in some
European countries for cats (horse antibodies Repeated treatment (at an interval of more than
directed against FPV, feline herpesvirus and 1 week) should be avoided, as cats may display
feline calicivirus). They are marketed for anaphylactic reactions.40
prophylactic and therapeutic use, with Immune serum (see box on page 544) may
protection lasting for about 3 weeks. During also be prepared in the veterinary practice by
this period, the cats cannot be vaccinated bleeding healthy donor cats (preferably groups
with a MLV product, because the of recovered animals). Hyperimmune serum
immunoglobulins will neutralise the would be obtained from animals that had been
attenuated virus. Although large amounts of repeatedly vaccinated. If such sera are used,
foreign (equine) protein are administered, their antibody content and consequently the
allergic reactions and side effects are rare. duration of protection are obviously unknown.
Acknowledgements
KEY POINTS
The European Advisory
Board on Cat Diseases ✜ Feline panleukopenia virus (FPV) infects all felids as well as raccoons,
(ABCD) is indebted to mink and foxes.
Dr Karin de Lange for her
judicious assistance in ✜ FPV may survive in the environment for several months.
organising this special issue, ✜ Indirect contact is the most common route of infection.
her efforts at coordination,
✜ FPV affects cats of all ages but kittens are most susceptible.
and her friendly deadline-
keeping. The tireless ✜ FPV antigen is detected in faeces with commercial test kits that detect viral antigens.
editorial assistance of Specialised laboratories carry out PCR testing on whole blood or faeces.
Christina Espert-Sanchez ✜ Supportive therapy and good nursing significantly decrease mortality rates.
is gratefully acknowledged.
The groundwork for ✜ In cases of enteritis, parenteral administration of a broad-spectrum antibiotic
this series of guidelines is recommended.
would not have been ✜ Disinfectants containing sodium hypochlorite (bleach), peracetic acid, formaldehyde
possible without financial or sodium hydroxide are effective.
support from Merial.
The ABCD particularly ✜ All cats – including indoor cats – should be vaccinated.
appreciates the support ✜ Two injections of kittens, at 8–9 weeks of age and 3–4 weeks later, are recommended,
of Dr Jean-Christophe and a first booster 1 year later.
Thibault, who respected
the team’s insistence on ✜ A third vaccination at 16–20 weeks of age is recommended for kittens from environments
scientific independence. with a high infection pressure or from queens with high vaccine-induced antibody levels.
✜ The next booster vaccinations are given at intervals of 3 years or more.
✜ Although protection starts rapidly after injection of modified-live virus vaccines,
they should not be used in pregnant queens and in kittens less than 4 weeks of age.
References virus kept under outdoor conditions. Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol
Scand 1999; 107: 353–58.
1 Parrish CR. Emergence, natural history and variation of canine, mink 13 Addie DD, Toth S, Thompson H, Jarrett JO, Greenwood N. Detection of
and feline parvoviruses. Adv Virus Res 1990; 38: 403–50. feline parvovirus in dying pedigree kittens. Vet Rec 1998; 142: 353–56.
2 Tattersall P. The evolution of parvovirus taxonomy. In: Kerr J, Cotmore 14 Cave TA, Thompson H, Reid SW, Hodgson DR. Kitten mortality in the
SF, Bloom ME, Linden RM, Parrish CR, eds. Parvoviruses. New York: United Kingdom: a retrospective analysis of 274 histopathological
Oxford University Press, 2006: 5–14. examinations (1986 to 2000). Vet Rec 2002; 151: 497–501.
3 Steinel A, Parrish CR, Bloom ME, Truyen U. Parvovirus infections in 15 Parrish CR. Pathogenesis of feline panleukopenia virus and canine par-
wild carnivores. J Wildl Dis 2001; 37: 594–607. vovirus. Baillieres Clin Haematol 1995; 8: 57–71.
4 Truyen U, Parrish CR. Canine and feline host ranges of canine parvo- 16 Truyen U, Parrish CR. Epidemiology and pathology of autonomous
virus and feline panleukopenia virus. Distinct host cell tropisms of each parvoviruses. In: Faisst S, Rommelaere J, eds. Contributions to micro-
virus in vitro and in vivo. J Virol 1992; 66: 5399–408. biology: parvoviruses. Vol 4. Basel: Karger AG, 2000: 149–62.
5 Carmichael LE. An annotated historical account of canine parvovirus. 17 Parrish CR. Pathogenesis of feline panleukopenia virus and canine par-
J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health 2005; 52: 303–11. vovirus. In: Kerr J, Cotmore SF, Bloom ME, Linden RM, Parrish CR, eds.
6 Truyen U. Emergence and recent evolution of canine parvovirus. Parvoviruses. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006: 429–34.
Vet Microbiol 1999; 69: 47–50. 18 Csiza CK, De Lahunta A, Scott FW, Gillespie JH. Pathogenesis of feline
7 Hueffer K, Parrish CR. Parvovirus host range, cell tropism and evolu- panleukopenia virus in susceptible newborn kittens II. Pathology and
tion. Curr Opin Microbiol 2003; 6: 392–98. immunofluorescence. Infect Immun 1971; 3: 838–46.
8 Truyen U, Gruenberg A, Chang SF, Veijalainen P, Obermaier B, Parrish 19 Kilham L, Margolis G, Colby ED. Cerebellar ataxia and its congenital
CR. Evolution of the feline subgroup parvoviruses and the control of transmission in cats by feline panleukopenia virus. J Am Vet Med Assoc
canine host range. J Virol 1995, 69: 4702–10. 1971; 158: 888–901.
9 Truyen U, Evermann JF, Vieler E, Parrish CR. Evolution of canine par- 20 Pedersen NC. Feline panleukopenia virus. In: Appel MJ, ed. Virus
vovirus involved loss and gain of the feline host range. Virology 1995; infections of carnivores. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1987: 247–54.
215: 186–89. 21 Ikeda Y, Shinozuka J, Miyazawa T, et al. Apoptosis in feline pan-
10 Mochizuki M, Horiuchi M, Hiragi H, San Gabriel MC, Yasuda N, Uno leukopenia virus-infected lymphocytes. J Virol 1998; 72: 6932–36.
T. Isolation of canine parvovirus from a cat manifesting clinical signs of 22 Scott F, Csiza CK, Gillespie JH. Maternally derived immunity to feline
feline panleukopenia. J Clin Microbiol 1996; 34: 2101–5. panleukopenia. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1970; 156: 439–53.
11 Truyen U. Canine parvoviren in Deutschland: ein update. Proceedings 23 Dawson S, Willoughby K, Gaskell RM, Wood G, Chalmers WSK. A field
of the 22nd Congress of the German Veterinary Society (DVG), 1997: trial to assess the effect of vaccination against feline herpesvirus, feline
204–8. calicivirus and feline panleucopenia virus in 6-week-old kittens. J Feline
12 Uttenthal A, Lund E, Hansen M. Mink enteritis parvovirus. Stability of Med Surg 2001; 3: 17–22.
24 Casseleux G, Fontaine E. Gestion de la parvovirose en élevage canin. 44 De Mari K, Maynard L, Eun HM, Lebreux B. Treatment of canine
Point Vet 2006; 37: 42–6. parvoviral enteritis with interferon-omega in a placebo-controlled field
25 Thiry E. Canine parvovirus infection. In: Clinical virology of the dog trial. Vet Rec 2003; 152: 105–8.
and cat. Maisons-Alfort: Editions du Point Vétérinaire, 2006: 29–41. 45 Mochizuki M, Nakatani H, Yoshida M. Inhibitory effects of recombi-
26 Thiry E. Feline panleukopenia – feline infectious enteritis. In: Clinical nant feline interferon on the replication of feline enteropathogenic
virology of the dog and cat. Maisons-Alfort: Editions du Point viruses in vitro. Vet Microbiol 1994; 39: 145–52.
Vétérinaire, 2006:137–42. 46 Köhler C. Untersuchungen zur änderung der DVG-desinfektionsmit-
27 Barlough JE, Barr M, Scott FW, Richards JR. Viral diseases. In: Siegal M, telrichtlinien (viruzidie). Thesis Dr. med. vet. Veterinary Faculty,
ed. The Cornell book of cats. 2nd edn. New York: Random House University of Leipzig, 2006.
Publishing Group, 1997: 278–93. 47 Greene CE, Addie DD. Feline panleukopenia. In: Greene CE, ed.
28 Rimmelzwaan GF, van der Heijden RW, Tijhaar E, et al. Establishment Infectious diseases of the dog and cat, Philadelphia: WB Saunders
and characterization of canine parvovirus-specific murine CD4+ T cell Company, 2005: 78–88.
clones and their use for the delineation of T cell epitopes. J Gen Virol 48 Levy JK, Patterson EV, Reese MJ, Tucker SJ. Impact of vaccination on
1990; 71: 1095–102. parvovirus testing in kittens. J Vet Intern Med 2006; 20: 711.
29 Miyazawa T, Ikeda Y, Nakamura K, et al. Isolation of feline parvovirus 49 Levy JK, Fisher SM, Quest CM, Tucker SJ. Serological responses of feral
from peripheral blood mononuclear cells of cats in northern Vietnam. cats to vaccination in trap-neuter-return programs. J Vet Intern Med
Microbiol Immunol 1999; 43: 609–12. 2006; 20: 711.
30 Goto H. Feline panleukopenia in Japan. II. Hemagglutinability of the 50 Pollock RVH, Postorino NC. Feline panleukopenia and other enteric
isolated virus. Nippon Juigaku Zasshi 1975; 37: 239–45. viral diseases. In: Sherding RG, ed. The cat: diseases and clinical
31 Veijalainen PM, Neuvonen E, Niskanen A, Juokslahti T. Latex aggluti- management. 2nd edn. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1994:
nation test for detecting feline panleukopenia virus, canine parvovirus 479–87.
and parvoviruses of fur animals. J Clin Microbiol 1986; 23: 556–59. 51 Scott FW, Geissinger CM. Long-term immunity in cats vaccinated with
32 Neuerer FF, Horlacher K, Truyen U, Hartmann K. Comparison of an inactivated trivalent vaccine. Am J Vet Res 1999; 60: 652–58.
different in-house test systems to detect parvovirus in faeces of cats. 52 Chalmers WSK, Truyen U, Greenwood NM, Baxendale W. Efficacy of
J Feline Med Surg 2008; 10: 247–51. feline panleucopenia vaccine to prevent infection with an isolate of
33 Schunck B, Kraft W, Truyen U. A simple touch-down polymerase chain CPV2b obtained from a cat. Vet Microbiol 1999; 69: 41–5.
reaction for the detection of canine parvovirus and feline panleuko- 53 Nakamura K, Ikeda Y, Miyazawa T, Tohya Y, Takahashi E, Mochizuki
penia virus in feces. J Virol Methods 1995; 55: 427–33. M. Characterisation of cross-reactivity of virus neutralising antibodies
34 Ryser-Degiorgis MP, Hofmann-Lehmann R, Leutenegger CM, et al. induced by feline panleukopenia virus and canine parvoviruses.
Epizootiologic investigations of selected infectious disease agents in Res Vet Sci 2001; 71: 219–22.
free-ranging Eurasian lynx from Sweden. J Wildl Dis 2005; 41: 58–66. 54 Greene CE, Schulz RD. Immunoprophylaxis and immunotherapy.
35 Lutz H, Castelli I, Ehrensperger F, et al. Panleukopenia-like syndrome In: Greene CE, ed. Infectious diseases of the dog and cat. Philadelphia:
of FeLV caused by co-infection with FeLV and feline panleukopenia WB Saunders Company, 2005: 1069–119.
virus. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 1995; 46: 21–33. 55 Levy JK, Crawford PC. Failure of passive transfer in neonatal kittens:
36 Fiscus SA, Mildbrand MM, Gordon JC, Teramoto YA, Winston S. correction by administration of adult cat serum. J Vet Intern Med 2000;
Rapid enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detecting antibodies to 14: 362.
canine parvovirus. Am J Vet Res 1985; 46: 859–63. 56 Lawler DH, Evans RH. Strategies for controlling viral infections in
37 Hofmann-Lehmann R, Fehr D, Grob M, et al. Prevalence of antibodies feline populations. In: August JR, ed. Consultations in feline internal
to feline parvovirus, calicivirus, herpesvirus, coronavirus and immuno- medicine 3. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company, 1997: 603–10.
deficiency virus and of feline leukemia virus antigen and the inter- 57 Nara PL, Krakowka S, Powers TE. Effects of prednisolone on the devel-
relationship of these viral infections in free-ranging lions in east Africa. opment of immune response to canine distemper virus in beagle pups.
Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 1996; 3: 554–62. Am J Vet Res 1979; 40: 1742–47.
38 Lappin MR, Andrews J, Simpson D, Jensen WA. Use of serologic tests 58 Dawson S, Smyth NR, Bennett M, et al. Effect of primary-stage feline
to predict resistance to feline herpesvirus 1, feline calicivirus and feline immunnodeficiency virus infection on subsequent feline calicivirus
parvovirus infection in cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002; 220: 38–42. vaccination and challenge in cats. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 1991; 5:
39 Mohr AJ, Leisewitz AL, Jacobson LS, Steiner JM, Ruaux CG, Williams 747–50.
DA. Effect of early enteral nutrition on intestinal permeability, intestin- 59 Reubel GH, Dean GA, George JW, Barlough JE, Pedersen NC. Effects of
al protein loss and outcome in dogs with severe parvoviral enteritis. incidental infections and immune activation on disease progression in
J Vet Intern Med 2003; 17: 791–98. experimentally feline immunodeficiency virus-infected cats. J Acquir
40 Hartmann K, Hein J. Feline panleukopenie. Praxisrelevante fragen Immune Defic Syndr 1994; 7: 1003–15.
anhand eines fallbeispiels. Tierarztl Prax 2002; 30: 393–99. 60 Foley JE, Leutenegger CM, Dumler JS, Pedersen NC, Madigan JE.
41 Meunier PC, Cooper BJ, Appel MJ, Lanieu MF, Slauson DO. Evidence for modulated immune response to Anaplasma phagocytophila
Pathogenesis of canine parvovirus enteritis: sequential virus distribu- sensu lato in cats with FIV-induced immunosuppression. Comp
tion and passive immunization studies. Vet Pathol 1998; 22: 617–24. Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 2003; 26: 103–13.
42 Macintire DK, Smith-Carr S, Jones R, Swango L. Treatment of dogs 61 Buonavoglia C, Marsilio F, Tempesta M, et al. Use of a feline pan-
naturally infected with canine parvovirus with lyophilized canine leukopenia modified-live virus vaccine in cats in the primary stage of
IgG. Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference of the American feline immunodeficiency virus-infection. Zentralbl Veterinarmed B 1993;
College of Veterinary Internal Medicine. June 10–13, 1999, abstract 118, 40: 343–46.
1999: 721. 62 Lehman R, von Beust B, Niederer E, et al. Immunization-induced
43 Martin V, Najbar W, Gueguen S, et al. Treatment of canine parvoviral decrease of the CDA+:CD8+ ratio in cats experimentally infected with
enteritis with interferon-omega in a placebo-controlled challenge trial. feline immunodeficiency virus. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 1992; 35:
Vet Microbiol 2002; 89: 115–27. 199–14.