Unit 6: Stylistics: The Field of Discourse, The Style of Discourse and The Mode of Discourse
Unit 6: Stylistics: The Field of Discourse, The Style of Discourse and The Mode of Discourse
Unit 6: Stylistics: The Field of Discourse, The Style of Discourse and The Mode of Discourse
UNIT STRUCTURE
6.2 INTRODUCTION
In the general sense, stylistics is the study of style; of how language use
varies according to varying situations and contexts in which language is
used either orally or in writing. In this unit you shall be introduced to the nature
and scope of stylistics. We observe that what style we adopt depends upon
a number of situational factors that can be explained in three domains namely,
the field of discourse, the style of discourse and the mode of discourse.
(c) The mode of discourse which refers to the medium in which the
language is used. The medium could be spoken or written. The style of
spoken language is different from that of the written language and so on.
We make a selection from a range of syntactic and lexical
possibilities according to the purpose of communication and the context
and situation in which the communication takes place. For example,
depending on the speaker-listener relationship, we use an informal or a
semi-formal or formal style. Likewise, depending on whether it is in the
spoken or the written mode, our style may vary. Again, depending on the
field in which we are using language as to whether we are writing a news-
story or a work of fiction or a commercial correspondence, our style will
also vary. A study of these variations in the use of language belongs to the
purview of stylistics.
The study of style has traditionally been the preserve of literary
criticism. Through the centuries, literary critics from Horace and Longinus
to Matthew Arnold and Dr F.R. Leavis and beyond, have characteristically
examined the way in which different literary works use different literary styles
to represent human experience. The ultimate concern of the literary critic is
with evaluation, with being able to say whether a work succeeds or fails as
a work of art.
Stylistics does not discriminate between literary texts and non-literary
texts as worthwhile objects of study. In other words, stylistics does not
attempt to accord a privileged status to a literary work over a non-literary
work which could be a travel brochure or an entry of a recipe book or any
written text for that matter. Thus, the scope of stylistics is much wider than
that of literary criticism with its exclusive concern for literary texts.
Secondly, stylistics does not accord a privileged position to the written
text over the spoken word. The spoken word can be fairly extensive; one
can think about sports commentaries, religious sermons, chat shows,
conversational acts, etc., all of which come under the purview of stylistics.
The primary agenda of stylistics is to concern itself with the text – either
literary or non-literary, either spoken or written, as a linguistic entity worthy
of serious study.
72 From Language to Literature (Block-1)
Stylistics Unit 6
be accounted for. It does not attempt to follow the path of literary criticism
leading to a search for literary value of a piece of text. Freed from the burden
of evaluation, stylistics approaches a literary text with a fresh and almost a
naive eye and explores some very basic issues concerning the ways in
which the language of a literary text communicates.
We may illustrate the stylistic approach to a literary text through the
concept of foregrounding. It is a term originally from painting where it is a
means of achieving significance. If we assume that literary language is
somewhat different from non-literary language, then we can say that non-
literary language is the background against which literary language is
foregrounded. Foregrounding devices are not systematically employed in
non-literary language unlike as in literary language where a word or
expression stands out or deviates from normal collocation or usage so as
to give what Leech calls “an extra regularity into the language. Stylistic
analysis of literary texts would attempt to discover foregrounding in the text
and see how these devices are aesthetically purposeful. When we read
Eliot’s “Prufrock...” for example, the colloquial expressions in the poem
appear to stand out. Stylistic analysis attempts to discover significance in
these deviations.
The nature of the language of literature has been engaging the
attention of stylistics more than anything else. These engagements point to
diverse views on literary styles, especially formal poetic style, by carrying
the notion that poets exercise a freedom in their use of language that is
denied to the others. The term “poetic licence” is used to explain this freedom.
Poetic licence is the liberty allowed to poets to play with the language
according to their needs in the uses of figurative speech, archaism among
others. These uses characterise literary language in the sense that they
are deviations from the general use of language which has been considered
to be the norm. These devices including foregrounding are the tools of
stylistics in the attempt to analyse literary texts.
The term “formal poetic style” carries the notion that the language of
poetry contains features that distinguish it from the features of prose. If we
take the language of prose as the norm we can say that the language of
poetry is a deviation from the norm. Poetic language deviates by the use of
figurative speech and archaism. The term figurative speech refers to the
use of literary devices like similes, metaphors, personification, transferred
epithets etc. We had earlier discussed these literary devices along with a
number of stylistic devices in our unit on The Language of Literature. The
term archaism is another literary device used in literary texts. The term
denotes use of words or expressions especially in poetry that have now
been considered old or obsolete. These uses contribute towards making
the language of poetry deviate from that of prose or the language of
conversation referred to as verbal style.
Deviation is especially characteristic of poetic language: the
language deviates from expected norms of linguistic expression. A study of
these deviations can give us a fair idea of what constitutes poetic language.
Moreover, these deviations provide us a framework for the analysis of a
literary text. They are the linguistic devices that poets make use of to bring
distinctiveness in literary language. A few of them have been briefly
discussed below:
(a) Lexical deviation: The term refers to the liberty of poets to coin new
words or to give new meanings to an old word. Poets apply the existing
rules of word formation with greater generality than is customary.
(b) Grammatical deviation: The term refers to the liberty of poets to deviate
from the grammatical conventions that allow an ordering of different
grammatical elements in a pattern. Word-order in English syntax being
fixed, it is possible to identify patterns in poetry that deviate from these
fixed patterns as in
The term formal prose style used here refers to written prose that is distinct
from conversational or verbal style on the one hand and formal poetic style
on the other. The basic character of formal prose style is its distinctive and
well-structured syntax, its use of complete and well-formed sentences that
follow all the conventions of grammar and usage. For example, a notable
feature of formal prose style is the use of subordinations and passive
constructions. Such constructions are very rare in conversational style.
From Language to Literature (Block-1) 77
Unit 6 Stylistics
The sentence constructions used in formal prose style follows the cannons
of grammaticality unlike poetic style where grammatical deviation of a device
followed by poets besides a host of other devices that go under the category
of poetic licence. Grammaticality can be called a distinctive feature of formal
prose style.
Ans to Q1.
(a) Stylistics is a field of study that makes use of the new insights in
linguistics to study the language of literature. In other words, stylistics
is the linguistic study of language. However, because of its concern
with language, stylistics also reaches out to non-literary language as
worthwhile objects of study.
(b) The field of stylistics is much wider than that of literary criticism.
Stylistics encompasses not only literary and non-literary texts but also
both oral and written texts. On the other hand, the range of literary
criticism is restricted to an evaluation of a literary text.
(c) For the field of discourse refer to 6.3. (a).
(d) Example: You are advised to see the doctor.
Ans to Q2.
(a) The term “poetic licence” refers to the liberty enjoyed by poets to break
the rules of the language when it suits them. The poets exercise this
freedom of distorting common or ordinary language with a definite
aesthetic purpose. But unless the aesthetic purposefulness emerges,
sooner or later in the interpretation of the poem, the deviation will be
felt to be mere whimsical or a habit on the part of poets for their own
sake.
(b) See 6.4.
Ans to Q3.
(a) Parallel structures or parallelism
(b) Grammatical deviation
(c) Repetition as a poetic device
(d) For semantic deviation see 6.5.
Ans to Q4.
(a) Grammaticality: see 6.6.
(b) Appropriateness: see 6.6.
*****