Research Paper On Wfs
Research Paper On Wfs
KEYWORDS: foundry waste, foundry sand, concrete, strength, industrial waste, utilization.
In the casting process, molding sands are recycled and reused multiple
times. Eventually, however, the recycled sand degrades to the point
that it can no longer be reused in the casting process. At that point, the
old sand is displaced from the cycle as byproduct, new sand is intro-
duced, and the cycle begins again.
India ranks second in the world based on the number of foundry units Structural Fill
present (4550 units) - after China – and fourth in terms of total pro- Foundry sand can be used as support for structures such as road-
duction (7.8 million tonnes) (42nd Census of World Casting Production ways, parking lots, buildings, and pieces of equipment. "Encapsu-
– 2007). Apart from the registered 4550 units there are several unreg- lated" structural fill may involve the use of a liner, cap, or cover,
istered units, which according to various sources range approximately generally made of a clay material, which prevents water from per-
from 1500 to 5000 units. As per the IREDA- CII Report 2004, there are colating through the foundry sand and minimizes the potential
around 10,000 foundry units present in India including registered and for leaching.
unregistered units. Considering that 4550 units are registered, the total
number of units unregistered is around 5450 units. As per estimation Manufacturing another Product
of experts of the foundry sector, there are around 1500 unregistered Foundry sand is useful as a raw material in manufacturing other prod-
foundry units that are scattered across the country. This discrepancy in ucts, such as controlled, low-strength material (CLSM or flowable fill),
unregistered units is mainly due to the fact that the 5450 units includ- asphalt, cement, concrete, grout, lightweight aggregate, concrete
ed all kinds of micro and small units engaged in castings. Whereas the block, bricks, roofing materials, plastics, paint, glass, ceramics, and
1500 units data incorporates only those foundry units that are engaged rockwool.
in grey iron casting and use conventional cupola and excludes those
units that are too micro in nature and use crucible for melting of metals. Specific examples of these uses include:
Also several foundry units had closed due to non compliance with the • Flowable fill: Flowable fill is a liquid-like material that self-com-
pollution standard set by the government for example Howrah, Agra pacts and is used as a substitute for conventional soil backfill. The
and nearby areas. product is easily transported and can be readily re-excavated. The
typical mixture contains sand, fly ash, portland cement, and water.
The foundry produces a wide variety of castings such as manhole Foundry sand can readily be substituted for virgin sand in flowable
covers, pipe and pipe fittings, sanitary items, tube well body, metric fill mixtures.
weights, automobile components, railway parts, electric motor, fan • Cement and Concrete: Sand is a component of Portland cement
body etc. 90% of the castings produced are from the SSI sector. Most and concrete. Portland cement requires sand with a silica content
of these units are situated in clusters, with cluster size ranging from 30- of at least 80 percent, which most foundry sands meet. It also re-
500 units. quires certain minerals such as iron and aluminum oxides, which
are found in many foundry sands. Cement and additional sand
EXPORTS OF CASTINGS FROM INDIA or gravel are components of concrete, allowing further reuse of
The export of Castings from India (both sanitary and industrial com- foundry sand.
bined) has witnessed a steady growth consistently year after year from
Rs.1,404 crores in 2001-02 to Rs.2,997 crores in 2005-06, almost dou- Soil Manufacturing and Amendment
bled in five years. Year-wise break – up of exports is tabulated below: Commercial soil blending operations can use foundry sand to produce
India today ranks tenth among casting exporting countries. horticultural soils, topsoil, potting soil, and turf mixes. These soil prod-
ucts are typically mixtures of sand or gravel with peat, fertilizers, and/or
TABLE: 2 top soil. Foundry sand can also improve the performance of agricultural
COUNTRY V/S FOUNDRY PRODUCTIONS: SCENARIO OF soils, and can be used as a composting ingredient.
WORLD
Year Sanitary Castings Industrial Casting Total Landfill Uses
2001-02 524.00 880.00 1,404.00 Foundry sand can be used as a cover for the working face of an active
2002-03 609.00 1,038.00 1,647.00 landfill, for road construction within the active cell, or as a substitute
for virgin aggregate in the construction of drainage layers for landfill
2003-04 867.00 1,058.00 1,925.00
leachate collection systems.
2004-05 1,242.00 1,383.00 2,652.00
2005-06 1,530.00 1,467.00 2,997.00 Pipe Bedding and Backfill
Predicted 2,536.00 2,054.00 4,590.00 Foundry sand can serve as backfill for trenches created by the installa-
2011-12
tion of storm and sanitary sewer lines.
Sources: Census of World Casting Production
TYPES OF FOUNDRY SAND
FOUNDRY CLUSTERS OF INDIA Two general types of binder systems are used in metal casting de-
pending upon which the foundry sands are classified as: clay bonded
systems (Green sand) and chemically- bonded systems. Both types of
sands are suitable for beneficial use but they have different physical
and environmental characteristics
Green sand molds are used to produce about 90% of casting volume in
the U.S. Green sand is composed of naturally occurring materials which
are blended together; high quality silica sand (85-95%), bentonite clay
(4-10%) as a binder, a carbonaceous additive (2-10%) to improve the
casting surface finish and water (2- 5%). Green sand is the most com-
monly used recycled foundry sand for beneficial reuse. It is black in
color, due to carbon content, has a clay content that results in percent-
age of material that passes a 200 sieve and adheres together due to
clay and water.
Chemically bonded sands are used both in core making where high
strengths are necessary to withstand the heat of molten metal, and
in mold making. Most chemical binder systems consist of an organic
binder that is activated by a catalyst although some systems use inor-
Figure: 2 Foundry Clusters ganic binders. Chemically bonded sands are generally light in color and
Source: Institute of Indian Foundry Man in texture than clay bonded sands.
TABLE: 3
TYPICAL PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SPENT GREEN
FOUNDRY SAND
[American Foundry man’s Society, 1991]
TABLE: 4
CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF FOUNDRY SAND
Constituents Value (%)
SiO2 87.91
Al2O3 4.70
Fe2O3 0.94
Figure: 4 chemically bonded sands CaO 0.14
Source: foundry industry, GIDC, Vallabh Vidyanagar MgO 0.30
SO3 0.09
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF FOUNDRY SAND
Na2O3 0.19
Foundry sand is typically sub angular to round in shape. After being
used in the foundry process, a significant number of sand agglomera- K2O 0.25
tions form. When these are broken down, the shape of individual sand TiO2 0.15
grains is apparent. SrO 0.03
LOI 5.15
Source: R. Siddique, Waste Materials and By-Products in Concrete,
Springer-2008
LIMITATION
Foundry sand is black. In some concretes, this may cause the fin-
ished concrete to have a grayish/black tint, which may not be de-
sirable.
A 15% fine aggregate replacement with foundry sand produces a
minimal color change.
Figure: 6 Green Sands from a gray iron Industry Also, the foundry must be able to meet the quantity requirements
Source: R. Siddique, Waste Materials and By-Products in Concrete, of the precast manufacturer.
Springer-2008 Foundry sand reduced workability of concrete.
CONCLUSIONS
We can say that for 1m3 M20 grade of concrete consumption of fine ag-
gregate is 538.45 kg. Here in specimen M-4 we replace fine aggregate
Figure: 7 Process Flow Diagram of a Foundry Industry by 162 kg of foundry sand for 1m3 M20 grades of concrete. So, we can
Source: Google Image say that up to 30% foundry sand utilized for economical and sustain-
able development of concrete. Uses of foundry sand in concrete can
CASE STUDY save the metal industry disposal costs and produce a ‘greener’ concrete
In the present study, effect of foundry sand as fine aggregate replace- for construction. An innovative supplementary Construction Material is
ment on the compressive strength of concrete having mix proportions formed through this study.
of 1:1.45:2.20:1.103 was investigated. The percentages of replace-
ments were 0%, 10 %, 20% and 30 % by weight of fine aggregate. Tests ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
were performed for compressive strength for all replacement levels of The Authors thankfully acknowledge to Dr.C.L.Patel, Chairman, Charu-
foundry sand at different curing periods (28-days & 56-days). tar Vidya Mandal, Er.V.M.Patel, Hon.Jt. Secretary, Charutar Vidya Man-
dal, Mr. Yatinbhai Desai, Jay Maharaj construction, Dr.A.K.Verma, Head
TABLE: 5 & Professor, Structural Engineering Department, Dr.B.K.Shah, Associate
PROPORTION OF M-20 GRADE CONCRETE Professor, Structural Engineering Department, B.V.M. Engineering Col-
C Kg/ F.A. kg/ C.A. (10 mm) C.A.(20 mm) F.S.Kg/ W (Lts/ P(Lts/ lege, Vallabh Vidyanagar, Gujarat, India for their motivational and infra-
Mix m 3
m3 Kg/m3 Kg/m3 m3 m3) m3) structural support to carry out this research.
M-1 372 538.45 410.4 818.85 0 186 0.288
M-2 372 538.45 410.4 818.85 54 186 0.384
M-3 372 538.45 410.4 818.85 108 186 0.384
M-4 372 538.45 410.4 818.85 162 186 0.384
C=Cement, F.A. =Fine Aggregate, C.A. =Course Aggregate, F.S.
=Foundry Sand, W=Water, P= Plasticizer
Source:dspace.thapar.edu:8080/dspace/bit
tream/123456789/.../8042307.pdf
REFERENCES [1] Abichou T. Benson, C. Edil T., 1998a.Database on beneficial reuse of foundry by- products. Recycled materials in
geotechnical applications, Geotech. Spec. Publ.No.79, C. Vipulanandan and D.Elton, eds., ASCE, Reston, Va., 210-223 | [2]
Bemben,S.M.,Shulze,D.A.,1993.The influence of selected testing procedures on soil/geomembrane shear strength measurements.
Proc.,Geosynthetics ’93,Industrial Fabrics Association International,St.Paul,Minn.,619-631. | [3] Bemben, S.M., Shulze, D.A., 1995.The influence of testing procedures
on clay/geomembrane shear strength measurements. Proc. Geosynthetics ’95, IFAI, St.Paul, Minn., 1043-1056. | [4] Fredlund, D.G., Morgenstern, N.R., Widger, R.A.,
1978.Shear strength of unsaturated soils.Can.Geotech.J.,Ottawa,15(3),313-321. | [5] IS: 8112-1989, Specifications for 43-Grade Portland cement, Bureau of Indian
Standards, New Delhi, India. | [6] IS: 383-1970, Specifications for coarse and fine aggregates from natural sources for concrete, Bureau of Indian Standards, New
Delhi, India. | [7] IS: 10262-1982, Recommended guidelines for concrete mix design, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India. | [8] IS: 1199-1959, Indian standard
methods of sampling and analysis of concrete, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India. | [9] IS: 516-1959, Indian standard code of practice- methods of test for
strength of concrete, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India. | [10] Javed, S., Lovell, C., 1994.Use of Waste foundry sand in Highway construction.Rep. JHRP/
INDOT/FHWA-94/2J, Final REP., Purdue School of Engg., West Lafayette, Ind. | [11] Javed, S., Lovell, C. W., 1994b.Use of waste foundry sand in civil engineering.
Transp. Res. Rec. 1486, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 109–113. | [12] Kleven, J. R., Edil, T. B., Benson, C. H., 2000. Evaluation of excess
foundry system sands for use as sub base material. Transp.Res.Rec. 1714, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 40–48. | [13] Mitchell, J. K., 1993.
Fundamentals of soil behavior, Wiley, New York. | [14] Naik, T. R., and Singh, S. S., (1997a). Permeability of flowable slurry materials containing foundry sand and fly
ash. J. Geotech. and Geoenvir. Engg., ASCE, 123(5), 446–452. | [15] Naik, T. R., and Singh, S. S., (1997b). Flowable slurry containing foundry sands. J. Mat. in Civil.
Engg., ASCE, 9(2), 93–102. | [16] Naik, T. R., Singh, S. Shiw, and Ramme, W. Bruce, April, 2001.Performance and Leaching Assessment of Flowable Slurry. Journals of
Environmental Engg., V. 127,No. 4,pp 359-368. | [17] Naik, T.R.; Kraus, N. Rudolph; Chun, Yoon-moon; Ramme, W. Bruce; and Singh S.Shiw, August 2003.Properties
of Field Manufactured Cast-Concrete Products Utilizing Recycled Materials. Journals of Materials in Civil Engg.,V.15,No. 4,pp 400-407. | [18] Naik, T.R.; Kraus, N.
Rudolph; Chun, Yoon-moon; Ramme, W. Bruce; and Siddique Rafat, May-June2004.Precast Concrete Products Using Industrial By-Products. ACI Materials Journal.
101,No. 3,pp 199-206. | [19] Reddi, N. Lakshmi, Rieck, P. George, Schwab, A. P., Chou, S. T. and Fan, L.T., May 1995. Stabilization of Phenolics in foundry sand using
cementious materials. Journals of Hazardous Materials,V. 45, pp 89-106 | [20] Stark, T., Eid, H., 1994. Drained residual strength of cohesive soils. J. Geotech.Engg,
ASCE, 120(5), 856–871. | [21] Takasumi, D. L., Green, K. R., Holtz, R. D., 1991.Soil-geosynthetics interface strength characteristics: A review of state-of-the-attesting
procedures. Proc., Geosynthetics’91, Industrial Fabrics Association International, St. Paul, Minn., 87–100. | [22] Tikalsky, J. Paul, Smith, Earl and Regan, W. Raymond,
December 1998. Proportioning Spent Casting Sand in Controlled Low-Strength Materials. ACI Material Journal, V.95, No.6, pp 740-746. |