Spare Parts Inventory Management System in an

Automotive Downstream Supply Chain Network

A Case Study

A Dissertation
Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements
for the Degree of

Master of Engineering
in

Production Engineering

by

Salwinder Singh Gill

Registration no. 801282018

MECHANICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

THAPAR UNIVERSITY, PATIALA
July, 2014
i
ii
 ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to determine and validate the order point system in spare parts
inventory management system (SPIMS) in the supply chain of an automotive organization. The
objective was to control for costs.
A SPIMS as proposed by Nagarur et al. (1994) was adopted after due deliberations with regards
to the alignment between the SPIMS of the dealers of the automotive manufacturing organization
and that proposed by the dealers.
The SPIMS of the entire dealer network was studied; a critical analysis of SPIMS was carried out
to ascertain the parity in the operational aspects of the system. It was observed that across the
dealers the SPIMS was same and no modifications or customizations had been carried out,
during analysis it was also observed to manage the SPIMS had been sponsored by the parent
company.
The model proposed by Nagarur et al. (1994) was also validated by using actual data of last three
years collected over a period of six months. The order points were used to validate the model,
and results were improved from the actual system followed by dealers. Also, the proposed model
by Nagarur et al. (1994) was compared with the theoretical model of order point.

iii
Contents
List of Figures vi
List of Tables vii
Abbreviations viii

1 Introduction 1-9
1.1 Information Background 1
1.1.1 Product Support and Service Deliver Strategy 2
1.1.2 Influencing Factors in Spare Part Products’ Support 3
1.1.3 Effects of Operating Environment on System Reliability 4
1.2 Spare Parts 4
1.2.1 Spare Parts Management 5
1.3 Need for Spare Parts Inventory Management 6
1.4 Special Features of Spare Parts 7
1.5 Basic Question of Inventory Management 7
1.6 Demand Forecasting in Spare Parts 8
1.7 Spare Parts Problem in Inventory Management System 8
1.8 Objective of Spare Parts Inventory Management 9
2 Literature review 10-19
2.1 Introduction 10
2.2 Literature Review 10
2.3 Summary of Literature Review 17
2.4 Gaps in Literature 18
2.5 Objective of the Study 19
3 Methodology 20-24
4 Case Study 25-29
4.1 Spare Parts Inventory Management System - A Case Study 25
4.2 Ordering of Spare Parts 26
4.3 Data Redundancy 27

iv
 4.4 Transportation 28
4.5 Identification of Problem 28
4.6 Data Collected 28
4.7 Data Analysis 29
5 Results and discussions 30-32
5.1 Comparison of Order Points of Proposed Model with the Actual Base 30
Stock of Dealers
5.2 Comparison of Order Points of Conventional Model with the Actual Base 31
Stock of Dealers
5.3 Comparison of Order Points of Proposed Model and Order Points of 31
Conventional Model
5.4 Comparison of Inventory Cost and Inventory Carrying Cost of Dealers 31
with Proposed Model and Conventional Model
6 Conclusions and Future Scope 33-34
6.1 Conclusions 33
6.2 Future scope 34
References 35-38
Appendix 39-59

v
List of Figures
Figure 1.1 Link between three main influencing factors on the system at work 2
Figure 1.2 The relationship between product characteristics, product exploitation 3
and product support

vi
List of Tables
Table 4.1 List of Dealers Visited 26
Table 4.2 Types of Orders Placed 27
Table 4.3 Discount Terms on Type of Order Placed 28
Table 4.4 Order Validity 28
Table 4.5 Data Redundancy 28

vii
Abbreviations

RAM Reliability Availability and Maintainability

LCC Life Cycle Cost
VED Vital Essential and Desirable
ETA Event Tree Analysis
VMI Vendor Management Inventory
SPIMS Spare Part Inventory Management System
BDT Break Down Tractor
KBSAS Knowledge Based Service Automation System

viii
 CHAPTER 1
Introduction

Spare part inventories contribute huge extent of overall fraction of inventory investment in
addition to raw materials, work in process and finished goods, etc. Most important task faced by
automotive industry is spare part inventory management system.

1.1 Information Background

Customer satisfaction in automotive industry depends on the availability of product that has been
connected to the value of both product support and product characteristics. Customer awareness
about quality of product is exaggerated by how fine the product conforms to requirements as
well as makes it fit for the future use and its reliability over time [Juran and Blanton, 1999].
Product characteristics like supportability, maintainability and product support also affects the
customer satisfaction. In addition, it is not only exaggerated by the performance and value of
hardware purchased, and also by the entire cost received, and also by the superiority of the
product interaction and relationship experience of the product throughout the service life.
Therefore, every products in automotives, specially the spare parts need support in there working
life. The various forms of product supports that manufacturer offers the customers to help them
increase maximum worth from product, that is known as product support [Juran and Blanton,
1999]. Most industrial and automotive products deteriorate and wear and tear wear with use. In
general, because of technological and economical considerations, it is not possible to
manufacture a machine or system which is maintenance-free.
Distinctive form of product support comprise training, installation, maintenance, and repair
services, availability of spare parts, documentation, upgrades functionality, warranty schemes
and customer dealing [Goffin, 2000]. Managers also need to give consideration to product
support as it plays key role for many products for achieving satisfaction of customers and
loyalty, and increase the repeat sales. It can be a significant source of profit and revenue [Kott,
2008]. Also, competitive advantage in marketing is provided; and product segregation becomes

1
complicated in many markets; automotive organizations are rising looking to product support as
a prospective source of advantage [Loomba, 1996].
Generally, the industrialized machine or product at work has been linked with three basic
concepts: maintenance and provision service, service delivery, and lastly, the restoration of spare
parts (Figure 1). For the system to keep in unceasing operation and avoid sudden downtime,
everyone should consider all the factors to study system presentation

Figure 1.Three main factors influencing the system at work [adapted from Ghodrati et al., 2012]

The interdependent factors, and also the alteration in one factor affect the other factor and
altering the performance of the system.

1.1.1 Service Delivery and Strategy Product Support

Product characteristics and product support needs depend on such as maintainability and
reliability, the capabilities and customer’s services, and the situation of the product which the
product has been going to use. The merchandise support [Markeset and Kumar, 2003] conditions

2
have been constructed on both specification of design and conditions faced by the merchandise
user. Two critical issues of spare parts are maintenance and product support. The often trunks
from the poorly intended maintainability and reliability characteristics collective with poor
product support strategies and maintenance, which in turn leads to unintended stoppages.

1.1.2 Factors influencing in Spare Part Products’ Support

The issues influencing product support can be confidential as engineering aspects and
organizational aspects. Spare part product features such as product consistency availability and
maintainability (RAM), product life cycle cost (LCC), merchandise application factors such as
ecological situations have to be employed on the industrial side of aspect, topographical
distribution, social situation, and geopolitical and social conditions need to be located on the
structural side [Kumar et al., 1992].

Figure 2. Connection between characteristics of product, product exploitation and product

support [Adapted from Markeset and Kumar, 2003].

Functioning situation have been seriously measured in dimensioning spare part service delivery
product support performance strategies. More often than not, the manufacturer or supplier’s
suggested program of maintenance for and components and systems is generally built on age

3
with the consideration of construction atmosphere. This led to many unpredicted system and
failure of components. This creates poor system performance and a higher LCC due to
unplanned repairs and as well as support. The ecological conditions, in which the equipment’s
have been operating, are the temperature, dust, humidity, etc. Frequently have a considerable
influence on the maintenance need and product reliability characteristics and thus on the support
requirements [Kumar et al., 1992].

1.1.3 Properties of Functioning Atmosphere on System Consistency

Maintainability, availability, Reliability and of the product have been considered significant and
had an abundant impact on support of product. The reliability and nature of equipment
perceptibly had a large impact on the key elements of support of product. Extraordinary
dependability does not reject the need for the service, but surely reduces it. The products
regularly require conservation, achieved at unvarying interval of time to ensure the reliability of
product. Also the reliability of high upkeep do not mean that product would be free of
maintenance, but it will need less maintenance [Markeset and Kumar, 2003].
The consistency of the system is the probability that it have to accomplish the required functions
without the disappointment under given situations for an operating period of intended use.
However, it has been found that most articles on reliability consider failure time as the only
variable for estimating the reliability of the system. Another issues may also influence the
reliability features of a system during its working lifetime, and these are usually not considered
in reliability models [O Connor, 2002]. The environmental conditions, in which the equipment
operates, such as temperature, humidity, dust, etc. often have considerable influence on the
product reliability characteristics [Ghodrati and Kumar].

1.2 Spare Parts

Spare parts are technical equipments that are subject to planned maintenance or repair if failure
situation occurs. Maintenance and repair to replace defective parts with new parts has generally
been defined as spare parts [Fortuin and Martin, 1999]. The spare parts are used to keep goods or
equipments that the company sells [Buker, 2001]. Spares are also called spares or service parts.
Inventory of spare parts can be reserved at the manufacture location the locations of service, or
can be kept at location which are near to the service customers. Technical systems and industrial

4
installations will fail and therefore it is needed for repair and restoration of the condition in
which it is working. These classifications and installations are subjected to planned maintenance.
In most of the circumstances, maintenance and repair requires pieces of equipment to replace
defective parts. The common name for these parts used has been ‘spares’. Spare parts have been
divided into categories of repairable and consumables. Repairable parts have been categorized as
those parts which have been exchanged to different ones and have to be sent to restoration center
in the case of disaster situations. These parts have to be technically repairable. Consumables
parts are not technically repairable. These parts have to be replaced by new ones and scrapped in
case of failure situation [Botter and Fortuin, 2000].
Apparently, the control and management of spare parts constitutes a complex matter.
Common statistical models for inventory control lose their applicability, because the demand
process is different from that assumed due to the machine characteristics, operating situation and
unpredictable events during operation. Forecasting demand appears as an essential element in
many models, which requires some historical demand figures. This data has been generally
unavailable or invalid for new and less consumption parts. Unfortunately, the practical approach
of spare parts inventory management and control are not validated in any way, and then
controllability and objectivity are hard to guarantee [Fortuin and Martin, 1999]. The product
reliability characteristics and operating environment-based spare parts forecasting method
[Ghodrati and Kumar, 2005], as a systematic approach, may improve this undesirable situation.

1.2.1 Spare Parts Management

Significant role of spare parts management in achieving the anticipated availability of plant at a
cost of optimism. Currently, the automotive organizations are going for wealth intensive, mass
manufacture concerned with and refined technology. The stoppage for such plant and machinery
has been exorbitantly luxurious. It has been observed in automotive industries that the non-
availability of spare parts, when required for repairs, contributes to 50% of the total down time.
Also, the cost of spare parts is more than 50% of the total maintenance cost in the industry. It is a
paradox that the maintenance department has been complaining about the non-availability of the
spare parts to meet their requirement and finance department has been facing the problem of
increasing locked up capital in spare parts inventory. This amply signifies the vital importance of
spare parts management in any organizations [1].

5
1.3 Special Features of Spare Parts
In the contemporary manufacturing scenario, automotive companies have been moving their
focus from manufacturing to improving their customer support and after sales services. This after
sales profit of spares has become a profitable area of business. Spare parts have been considered
important as they are needed for efficient working of the equipments; this makes the availability
of spares the important factor for all companies. In conditions like machine breakdown, the
availability of essential spares can reduce machine downtime. Thus unavailability of spares can
lead to many losses. Machine downtime could also result in lost revenues and customer
dissatisfaction. As machines are essential for companies capital so machine downtime should be
minimized resulting to proper customer satisfaction. Another point here is that it is not easy to
keep various spares in stock. As it causes excess of items and lead to high inventory which
further causes carrying cost. In this type of business managers should make exact stocking
decisions from the available information of lead time, shortage cost and demand [Driessen et al.
2010].

1.4 Basic Questions of Inventory Management

The control over level of inventory and positioning of inventory has been considered as the two
main purposes of inventory management. The importance of inventory management is the most
vital task for the companies. Inventory control is a difficult task and has complex structures in
many supply chains [Simchi Levi et al., 2004; Waters, 2009]. The main question of inventory
that needs to be addressed has been as to how to control the stock efficiently and ensuring the
availability of spare parts. Holding the spare parts in stores ties capital and resources of company
which in result limit sales growth. Also the stocking level of parts decline with period of time.
Therefore, storing high levels of inventory can lead to financial burden [Happonen, 2011]. All
automotive companies determine important items for operations. They decide which items
should be stocked, when to place an order, quantity of order. Also companies should measure
level of customer service and movement of item and analyze inventory cost [Waters, 2009].

6
1.5 Demand Forecasting in Spare Parts
Demand for forecasting in spare parts has been considered crucial issues of inventory
management have a challenge in the restoration and renovation engineering [Pham, 2006]. The
animated contest arises due to the irregular nature of the component failures and corresponding
random demand of the spare parts. Demand forecasting of spare parts refers to an estimation of
the supreme likely impending requirement of spares on components failure under given
conditions. Forecasting of spare parts also has a noticeable effect on executing the other issues of
spare parts inventory management like procurement and holding policy. Spare parts inventory
model differs substantially from regular inventory models since spare parts demands arise with
the failure of components. Inventories of spare parts differ from other manufacturing inventories
from functionality as well as from storing strategy point of view [Kennedy et al., 2012]

1.6 Spare Parts Problem in Inventory Management System

The exclusive difficulties faced by the organization in managing the spare parts are as follows
[1]: Firstly, an element of uncertainty as to when a part may be required and also the quantity of
its requirement. The importance of inventory management is the most vital task for the
companies. Inventory control is a difficult task and has complex structures in many supply
chains [Simchi Levi et al., 2004; Waters, 2009]. The main question of inventory that needs to be
addressed has been as to how to control the stock efficiently and ensuring the availability of
spare parts. Holding the spare parts in stores ties capital and resources of company which in
result limit sales growth. Also the stocking level of parts decline with period of time. Therefore,
storing high levels of inventory can lead to financial burden [Happonen, 2011]. All automotive
companies determine important items for operations. They decide which items should be
stocked, when to place an order, quantity of order. Also companies should measure level of
customer service and movement of item and analyze inventory cost [Waters, 2009].This
generally arises due to the failure of a component, either due to wearing out or due to other
reasons which cannot be predicted accurately. Finally, the consumption rates of spare parts in
some cases are very high and for some are very low. These problems are to be faced by spare
parts management [1].

7
1.7 Objective of Spare Parts Inventory Management
The objective of spare parts management is to ensure the availability of spares for maintenance
and repairs of the plant and machinery as and when required at an optimum cost. Also, the spares
should be of right quality [1]. There are many actions required to ensure the spare parts
management effective. A good inventory control system helps systemizing the ordering
procedure and also achieving an optimum level of inventory. In addition, selective efforts should
be made to evolve optimum replacement policies for selected spare parts, for which cost of down
time and cost of replacement are very high. For the spare parts which are very expensive and
those which are to be imported, it is essential that the useful life for such spares is extended by
appropriate applications of reconditioning and repair techniques. Also, efforts should be made to
indigenize the spare parts in view of the hard-to-get foreign exchange involvement. Also, for
similar industries establishing of spare parts bank goes a long way in reducing the total inventory
holding of the expensive spare parts and also reduces the stock holding cost. For different
industries, establishing spare parts banks and a suitable information system for the exchange of
spares has been considered a viable option. The objective of this study is to make proper balance
between spare parts availability and operational costs [Driessen et al., 2010]. In spare parts
supply chain the stock out results extremely costly. Therefore spare parts inventory is named as
special type inventory with special features. The calculation of accurate demand is always
difficult to forecast [Huiskonen, 2001]. Lately, the application of computers for the processing of
spare parts information and operating an effective spare parts control system has been helpful for
the organization to ensure timely actions for an efficient and effective spare parts management.
The main goal of this study was to streamline the spare part inventory management
system and unify inventory management policies of spare part dealers in order to strengthen the
service. This has been be done by examining account organization system. The main impartial
behind the study was to the optimize the invested capital in inventory while providing suitable
service level to the customers

8
 CHAPTER 2
Literature Review

2.1 Introduction
This chapter presents the summary of work carried out by different researchers on the spare part
inventory management system in different industries and proposed different models and
approaches to improve spare part inventory management system.

2.2 Literature Review

Nagarur et al. (1994) studied the spare part inventory system of a computer industry. The aim of
this study was to relate stock quantities according to demand to avoid overstocking and under
stocking of spares. They classified spare parts into four categories depending upon their cost and
lead time. Forecasting models with the high degree of the accuracy were implemented, demand
forecasting was determined and ordering point and safety stocks were computed. After determine
the various models the business factor index model was adopted for this system which was used
to calculate the ordering point of different class of items, with the help of these ordering points
the inventory cost was resulted to minimum and also increased the efficiency for ordering spare
parts.
Walker (1997) determined the base stock level for insurance type spares. The paper discussed
that maintenance managers regularly face problem determination of suitable stocking level of
spare parts. Inadequate stocking of spare parts can lead to machine downtimes. The study
considered insurance type spares of low demand and high cost critical spares as they accounted a
large part of investments for the industry. The paper used a simple graphical model to determine
initial number of spares that should be purchased because of high downtime cost. The probability
values taken in this method were 0.90, 0.95 and 0.99. This simple graphical method helped in
choosing the initial number of insurance spares to be purchased for system which was having
finite population sources of part failures. The method was suitable for poor quality of available
data and it also indicates sensitivity of decision to order.

9
Kumar and Knezevic (1997) gave the spare part optimization inventory models for both series
structures and parallel structures. According to the study it was not easy to predict required
number of spares for achieving exact availability of spares on time. High availability can be
achieved by ordering more number of spares. Ordering more number of spares results in
increasing cost and space conditions. It was investigated to order required number of spares and
determine them carefully and possibly optimize them. The study presented spares determination
model for both series and parallel system and concluded the impartial which improve the
availability with respect to minimizing space. The problem was solved with the help of simple
algorithms. The model helped in predicting the spare requirements to achieve specified
availability of stores with minimum space.
Kobbacy and Liang (1999) proposed an intelligent inventory management system that assisted
in decreasing the gap connecting theory and practice of inventory management. The authors
proposed an automatic demand and lead time detection to validate the model. The demand
identification with numerical tests were discussed, they identified the lead time pattern.
Probability distribution model for constant and probalistic demand were discussed with linear
and seasonal demand. The empirical evaluation of this system with real data of manufacturing
industries showed that system could lead to considerable saving of inventory cost.
Botter and Fortin (2000) suggested that facility part records were not accomplished by normal
inventory procedures as conditions of inventory models were not satisfied. But the critical
question of inventory switch has to be answered, which part have to be stocked? The place where
it should be stocked? What quantity of item should be stocked? Using VED approach the authors
identified the answers to the above questions. According to the authors the answer to the first
question depended on the criticality of the item, as if the customer was in need for the item and
item was not available, this lead to distinction of vital, essential and desirable parts. To answer
second question two factors were used i.e. usage in units and price of the item, service response
time was also important. The three scenarios resulted in developing a tool which was capable of
reaching desired level if lowering inventory cost.
Dubelaar et al. (2001) studied the inventory sales and service relationship of a retail chain store
operation. The effective inventory management was critical in retailing success of chain stores.
The study entailed a survey was done of 101 chain store units and developed and tested a series
of hypothesis about chain stores, seventy five percent responses were given to the mail survey.

10
Survey resulted in significant positive relationships between inventory, sales and service. On the
basis of the study, it was proposed that theory was found between inventory and sales. The
theory was found between inventory and sales. It was found that inventory was the function of
square root of sales. As the sales increase the inventory will automatically increase. Greater
product varieties of spares lead to higher inventory which in turn had a great impact on customer
service. The results inspired retailers to retain data on sales, stock, merchandise variety and
uncertainty in demand. The results proposed fine tuned inventories and improved performance of
stores.
Kumar and Chandra (2001) developed a heuristic ordering policy for managing multi items of
single vendor inventory system for random demand. The inventory points for every item was
timely reviewed. The order was placed until projected stocks out cost of all items were beyond
the desired certain multiple value of average ordering cost. The study offered rules for
determining the items which needed be included in order and also determined up to level for
every item. Two parameters were involved in rules that require estimation was done with
simulation. These types of systems were related to real life situations. This system was valuable
for independent convenience stores, grocery stores and small independent retailers. The ordering
rules of this paper were backbone of proposed inventory system for small business operations.
Pérès and Grenouilleau (2003) studied the spare parts management in a space system. The
study has been divided into three parts. The first one, dedicated to the characterization of the
system structure which showcased the particularities related to the spare-elements procurement.
The second part of the study dealt with modeling. After having exposed the bases of the problem
to be solved, the authors proposed a macro-model. The study further elaborates each of the three
elements of an orbital system, namely ground, flying and transport, with the help of Petri net.
Operation specificities of every element have been listed and integrated into the model. A
concrete application of this modeling has been given in the last part, which concerns the
Columbus laboratory of the International Space Station. The authors have proposed the selection
of a representative function and evaluation of several supply strategies. Through this study, the
modeling of the supply logistic chain and the evaluation of the technico-economical relevance of
its structure and control became possible. The authors concluded that the development of such a
tool would allow the finding of a partial solution to the difficulty of implementation of this type
of analysis

11
Braglia et al. (2004) implemented a multi attribute classification method for spare parts
inventory management for a paper industry. A complex problem which was faced by spare part
inventory management in industrial plants due to difficulty in data collection and large numbers
of factors. The attributes taken into account were inventory, lost production cost, safety and
environment, maintenance, logistic aspects of spare parts and spare parts classification. The
authors proposed an Inventory policy matrix that link different classes of spare parts which were
used to identify best control strategy of spare parts. The purpose of this study was to develop
decision support tool for maintenance managers and adjust the basic approach to validate the
inventory policy of each spare part in easy and quick way.
Levi (2004) considered the spare part inventory problem faced by electronic machine
manufacturers with expensive parts that were located at various customer locations. According to
the study these parts failed infrequently according to Poisson process. The study reported that as
the failure occurred the customer was served at the central warehouse or at depots. The
warehouse acted as the repair facility that replenishes the stock at field depots. The authors
developed a continuous review policy, base stock policy for this two echelon multi item spare
part system. The authors further formulated a model that minimized the system wide inventory
cost with response time constraint at field depots. This study presented an efficient heuristic
algorithm to study its computational effectiveness.
Ahn and Seo (2005) proposed an ordering model in the inventory system. The authors
introduced the order range (s, S) in inventory system. ‘s’ was considered as the ordering point of
inventory and ‘S’ was considered as maximum level of inventory. The model used was multi
item ordering model, ordering range was introduced instead of order points in the system. The
model proposed in the study has dealt transportation lead time as transportation constraints. This
model was tested with a numerical example and showed computational results that concluded the
effectiveness of this model.
Ghodrati and Kumar (2005) studied that with continuous increase of technological
development in twenty first century, the industry and industrial system have become more
complex and make their availability more important. The product support and its issues related to
spare parts played an important role. Lack of timely and incomplete support, such as the lacking
of spare parts when required, generally caused unexpected downtimes that in turn led to losses.

12
As a result it has become important to forecast the correct support to keep system working. The
paper implemented the proportional hazard model which examined the reliability of the system
and operating environment, these were the two parameters to be considered. The results of this
study indicated that operating environment of system had considerable amount of influence on
system performance. The authors proposed than an optimal way to prevent unplanned stoppages
was to forecast the required spare parts based on the technical characteristics and the system-
operating environment.
You and Wu (2006) investigated the ordering and pricing problem over restricted time planning
horizon for the inventory system with advance sales and spot sales. The study assumed was
assumed that the planning horizon was divided in several cycles of sale. These cycles were
divided into advance sales and spot sales. In advance sales customers were required to make
advance reservations for replenishment of orders and in spot sales customer received the order
during the time of purchase. But in actual, customer cancel their orders before receiving, this
phenomenon was adopted by this paper and continuous time inventory model was proposed to
deal with the system. Thus by determining advance sales and spot sales, order size,
replenishment frequency this study maximized the total profit over finite period of planning
prospect. Simple algorithms were developed to make optimal decisions and results were
computed.
Cheung et al. (2006) suggested that effective service logistics lowered the cost and increase the
service value by improving customer satisfaction and loyalty. The conventional way of the
service logistics were information driven instead of knowledge-driven which were insufficient to
meet the current needs. The purpose of this study was to present a knowledge-based service
automation system (KBSAS) to enhance the competitiveness for manufacturing enterprises in
service logistics. A prototype customer service portal was built based on the KBSAS and was
implemented successfully in a semi-conductor equipment manufacturing company. It had been
verified that the KBSAS provided high quality customer services with fast and efficient customer
responses. The system also allowed the company to capture the valuable experience and tacit
knowledge of the staff in performing customer and field services.
Ghodrati et al. (2007) studied that need of spare parts was dependent on the characteristics of
product in question e.g. reliability and maintainability, and the characteristics of the environment
in which the product was going to be used (e.g. temperature, humidity, and the operator’s skills

13
and capabilities), which constitute the covariates. These covariates had a considerable effect on
the system reliability characteristics and consequently on the required number of spare parts. The
basic objective of this research study was to estimate the associated risks (i.e. risk of shortage of
spare parts) in estimating the required number of spare parts due to not considering the
characteristics of operating environment system. In this study, a modified form of event tree
analysis (ETA) was introduced and implemented. In the new version the undesired states were
formed as an alternative of barriers in combination with events and consequent changes as safety
function in the event tree analysis. The ETA output reflected that there was a considerable
operational risk due to the losses related with the non-consideration of working environment of
event tree analysis the machine.
Razmi et al. (2009) studied the vendor management inventory (VMI) system and traditional
system and its comparison on performance basis. The study applied a mathematical modeling
was applied for measuring the performance of total cost of supply chain. The authors introduced
the extent point between the total costs of both systems to minimum. Numerical examples and
sensitivity analysis were related to illustrate the theory which helped in deriving the extent points
and percentage difference of both VMI system and traditional system. The results indicated that
VMI system worked better than traditional system and delivered lower cost in every condition
also including the backorders. As the traditional system was farther from the extent point and
VMI was closer to extent point and application of VMI was more justified. VMI system was
more beneficial and delivered lower cost in all conditions.
Keshteli and Sajadifar (2010) derived the cost function of three echelon inventory system of
two warehouse and ‘N’ retailers was considered in this paper. The study has been based on the
cost function which was derived from three echelon system with one for one ordering policy. In
this study independent Poisson demand was faced by the retailers under constant transportation
times; the delivery time was equal to transportation time plus random delay of stock out at
supplier in a two echelon inventory system. The three echelon inventory system considered here
was different from two echelon inventory system. The warehouse was added as third echelon
which leads to one more delay of shipment in new warehouse which increased the cost function
of inventory system. The numerical examples helped in showing that the cost function tendency
was convex and ensured to have minimum cost in inventory system.

14
Driessen (2010) presented a framework for planning and controlling the spare parts supply chain
of the organization that maintain and use high value capital assets. This study developed a
framework for controlling and planning spare parts and setting an agenda for future research.
The study highlighted that decisions made in this framework were decomposed hierarchically
and interfaces. The framework was used to increase the efficiency of decisions consistency and
sustainability as how to plan and control the spare parts supply chain. Applicability of this
framework was also investigated in different environments.
Rego and Mesquita (2011) reviewed that spare parts inventory was needed for repair and
maintenance of the products, vehicles, industrial machines and equipments. Requiring high
investment and significantly affecting customer satisfaction. Inventory management was
complex problem due to large number of items and lumpy demands. The study represented a
review on single location spare part inventory control, embracing demand forecasting techniques
and inventory control decisions on different life cycle stages. It was identified that opportunities
on inventory management decide whether to stock item or not, how much to order in first and
last batch, demand forecasting and inventory control models integration and case studies on real
applications.
Gebauer et al. (2011) aimed to offer recommendations in increasing spare parts logistics. The
paper suggested that recommendations for, increasing spares logistics had been rare despite of
the proven benefits of high performing spares logistics. According to the study spare part
business was considered as profit pool of the capital goods industry having about 17 percent of
industry’s total revenue. The margins in spare parts revenue were 25 percent on an average as
compared to 2-3 percent of the capital goods. Extensive benchmarking technique was conducted
the paper attempted to provide a better understanding and changes for improving logistics
performance in the Chinese market. The study analyzed that necessary changes achieved a
cutting-edge logistics solution and showed how companies should implement the solution.
Ghodrati et al. (2012) studied the product support improvement of spare parts by considering
the environment of operating system. The purpose of this study was to analyze influence of time
dependent factors of industrial system on product support when spare parts were needed.
According to the study the product support was affected by number of factors like operating
environment system, reliability and maintainability. From the study the authors reported that lack
of good support and critical spares led to unplanned stoppages. The authors suggested also said

15
that forecasting of spare parts on the basis of reliability and maintainability along with
environmental conditions could be most effective strategy for untimely stoppages. It was
generalized from the research that system operating environment should be considered while
spare parts estimation was done. After studying the various factors which influenced product
support the spare management software was used to check the results.

2.3 Summary of Literature Review

After studying the literature, it can be concluded that lot of work has been done in the field of
spare parts inventory management in one way or another work in the area of spare part inventory
management system has focused on the inventory of insurance type spares, spare part
optimization models for both series and parallel structures. Other studies have suggested that
service part inventories have not been managed by standard inventory methods and inventory
models were not sound. Studies also relate to the sales and service relationship of the retail chain
store operation. Research has also been done in the area of ordering policy of managing multi
items of single vendor inventory system for random demands. Some researchers implemented
the multi attribute classification method for spare parts inventory management in a paper
industry. Authors have investigated the ordering and pricing problem over a finite time horizon
of the inventory system. Also significant research has been done in the product support
improvement of spare parts by considering system operating environment. Some authors have
proposed a risk-based approach for the spare parts demand forecasting and spare parts inventory
management for the effective allocation of limited resources. The investigators have also
presented a framework for planning and controlling the spare parts supply chain for the
organization that maintained and used high value capital assets and also implemented the
proportional hazard model to the inventory system which examined the reliability of the system
and operating environment these were the two parameters to be considered and also the lack of
timely and incomplete support can cause unexpected downtimes. Research has also been done to
assess various factors that influenced product support implemented the spares management
software this was used to check the results of various factors. The vendor management inventory
system and traditional inventory system have been compared on the performance basis

16
2.4 Gaps in Literature
 From the review of literature it is evident that the model proposed for spare part
inventory management system has found limited reference and application in the
manufacturing industry. The quantum of benefit arising from the embedding of this
model in manufacturing or service industry has not been validated.
 The main focus related spare part inventory management system has been on the effect of
demand forecasting, insurance of inventory, service part inventory, ordering policy,
planning and controlling of supply chain, impact of time and unexpected downtimes
spare parts inventory.
 Limited research has been carried out in the spare part inventory management system in
computer industry. The focus on order points as criteria for managing spare parts
inventory has been found limited mention in the literature review. The importance of
order point in spare parts inventory management has been under played in most of the
studies, except that of Nagarur et al., (1994). Also, the model proposed for spare parts
inventory has not been validated in the literature, this serves as a reasonable argument to
investigate the validity of the model in different settings.

2.5 Objective of the Study

The objective of the study was to validate the model of spare part inventory management system
proposed by Nagarur et al. (1994) by applying it in the dealer network of an automotive
organization, by carefully matching the parameters of the model with the SPIMS of the dealer
network, data collected was gleaned for validation of the model. Comparisons of the results were
also drawn with theoretical model related to SPIMS.

17
 CHAPTER 3
Methodology

Nagarur et al. (1994) worked for developing a system for spare parts inventory. Extending their
work, a case study has been carried out to validate the model. Also, an effort has been made to
compare the results with actual data from the enterprise under study and also with the theoretical
models available in the literature.
The model proposed by authors was basically for designing the structure of spare part
inventory for a computer manufacturing organization that sells mainframe of computers,
personal computers, computer accessories and accepts repairs for replacement and repairs of the
components.
The model proposed by authors depicted the architectural configuration of information
system and has also dealt with the determination of the order point considering a number of
parameters.
Building on the research carried out by the authors, model was adopted for chain of spare
parts dealers in the automotive industry in Punjab to validate the model.
The model proposed by authors has been built on the fundamentals that, if parts are under
stocked the defective computers cannot be serviced will not be serviced due to shortages. If
parts were under stocked, then defective computers could not be serviced due to shortages,
resulting in dissatisfaction of the customer. On the other hand, if parts were overstocked, the
holding costs will be high due to surpluses. Also, tracking individual part will be a major task as
the number of spare parts runs in several thousands. Without a balanced system of managing
inventory some parts have very high inventory and some situations shortages could be quite
common. In this type of a service system, an efficient inventory management system is essential.
The premise for the proposed model as suggested by authors was to design a computer based
information system for inventory management for the spare parts in the service department.
 To relate stock quantities to demand, avoiding both over stocking and under stocking.
 To avoid losses due to spoilage, pilferage and obsolescence.
 To develop a model that will minimize total inventory cost while increasing efficiency of
the order.

18
The model proposed by authors has proposed some theoretical design considerations on ordering
policies.
Considering a computer industry the spare parts were classified into ABCD classification:
There were approximately 20,000 types of spare parts in the inventory system. Therefore
it was necessary to classify these parts into groups and to establish appropriate levels of control
over each category. These parts were based on the sources of supply and cost. The spare parts
were classified into four groups, described below:
A: The parts could be procured overseas only and the unit cost was very high.
B: The parts could be procured overseas only and the unit cost was not high.
C: The parts were available locally and the unit cost was very high.
D: The parts were available locally and the unit cost was not high.
The advantage of this classification lies in relaxation of inventory control rather in tightening
inventory control.
Less emphasis were on B and D class of items as they represented a bulk of inventory.
This classification resulted in simplicity and ease of operation.
The demand forecasting models used by this proposed system were:
 Product reliability model.
 Regression models.
 Time series forecasting model.
The regression models and time series forecasting model were easy to use, and they needed
less data, compared to reliability model. The choice of an appropriate model depends on the item
class and the agreement between forecast data and empirical data. Models with high accuracy
were needed; items belonging to class B and D do not needed any complicated and sensitive
models. Items of class A and C need high accuracy models, the model which gave the least
deviation of values from actual data were considered.
After determining the demand, the order points and safety stocks could be computed. After
studying various models, business factor index (BFI) order point model was adopted for this
proposed system by authors. The BFI order point technique was described as one that allows
management the opportunity to identify and emphasize the success factors. The resultant effect

19
of this technique was to maximize the advantages of company. The BFI order point calculations
were given by model proposed:

Order Point = (Dem × LT) + (Dem × LT) (D% + V% + E% + L %)

Where,
Dem= Average historical demand over a reasonable period of time or the forecast demand
LT = Normal current replenishment time
D = the effect the shortage of items will have on profit or production
V = the dollar value of the item
E = the deviation of demand from average usage
L = the lead time and lead time variation in replenishing the stock.
Researchers practiced BFI order point method, as the results indicated that this model
best fit the individual needs of spare parts business in the way that usual conventional ordering
points model were not able to do. The values of D, V, E and L are subjective and show the
relative effects of various factors considered in ordering an item. These values were provided by
the managers, who were involved in decision making process. The BFI approach not only
facilitates management involvement in decision making rules, but also makes aware about the
system, to improve it further.
The values of D, V, E and L were specified after discussing and consulting with the
managers, and according to the ABCD classification. The input values were:
D = 18% (the variation in demand was not more than100%)
V = 5% (the value of each order was more than 80,000 Baht)
E = 5% (this was a common stock), and
L = 25% (for A and B items) = 5% (for C and D items)
(The lead time for overseas procurement was 3 months and for local procurement it was 1 week).
These above values of different parameters resulted in the following formulas:
For A and B class items:
Order Point = (Dem × LT) + (Dem × LT) (D% + V% + E% + L %)
= (Dem × LT) + (Dem × LT) (18% + 5% + 5% + 25%)
= (Dem × LT) + (Dem × LT) (53%)
= 1.53 (Dem × LT).

20
For C and D class items:
Order Point = (Dem × LT) + (Dem × LT) (D% + V% + E% + L %)
= (Dem × LT) + (Dem × LT) (18% + 5% + 5% + 5%)
= (Dem × LT) + (Dem × LT) (33%)
= 1.33 (Dem × LT).
The value of variable Dem, the demand of the spare parts of previous month, was used to
calculate the adjusted demand during lead time.
The ordering policy was also given by the authors; the basic idea (S, c, s) of model was
adopted for the ordering policy of proposed system. Whenever the available inventory level of
items hits‘s’, it triggers the replenishment of stock to ‘S’. Also, at the same time, other spare
parts within the same family, with available inventory at or below it can order point ‘c’, which
was included in the replenishment of stock.
Adopting the model for the enterprise under study, the order point calculation has been
refined as below:
Order Point = (Dem × LT) + (Dem × LT) (D% + E% + L %)
Where,
Dem= Average historical demand over a reasonable period of time or the forecast demand
LT = Normal current replenishment time
D = the effect the shortage of items will have on profit or production
E = the deviation of demand from average usage
L = the lead time and lead time variation in replenishing the stock.

The parameter ‘V’ in determining the order point as proposed in the model was assumed
to be zero, because there was no extra cost in the procurement of spare parts.
For the existing study lead time was assumed to be the average lead time, because the time taken
for every delivery to replenish the stock was approximately same. The spare parts were procured
only from a single warehouse.
Also, after validating the model proposed by authors with a case study, the existing
model was compared with the theoretical model [2] of ordering points
The theoretical model [2] used to calculate the order point was:

21
Order point = (LT + SS + BS) × Unit sales per day
Where,
LT = lead time in days
SS = safety stock
BS = base stock
Also, on applying theoretical model the results were compared with existing model proposed by
authors and model followed by the company.

22
 CHAPTER 4
Case Study

4.1 Spare Parts Inventory Management system - a Case Study

The spare part inventory management system (SPIMS) of dealers was studied of XYZ Company.
This research was limited to focus on the spare part dealers to the area of Punjab. To carry out
the study, an elaborate schedule of visits to the dealers was chalked out. The objective of such
visits was to get not only the snapshot of the SPIMS but also to capture the operational aspects of
the SPIMS. The list dealers of tractor of XYZ Company visited has been tabulated in table.
Table 4.1: List of Dealers Visited
Sr .No. Dealer Code Palace
1 GRH110039 Guruharsahai
2 FRZ11206 Ferozepur
3 RMP11933 Rampura
4 MKT110712 Muktsar
5 GRD110045 Gurdaspur
6 FDK110027 Faridkot
7 BTI11407 Bathinda
8 BAR110019 Barnala
9 MGA110056 Moga
10 ABH11086 Abohar

A critical analysis of SPIMS was carried out to ascertain the parity in the operational aspects of
the system. It was observed that across the dealers the SPIMS was same and no modifications or
customizations had been carried out, during analysis it was also observed to manage the SPIMS
had been sponsored by the parent company.
The analysis further revealed that SPIMS used by dealers involved both the aspects of push and
pull system. As far as push system is concerned it was observed that dealers across Punjab had
little option in adjusting for inventory as the consignments received from the parent company

23
had to be accepted. Analysis further revealed that there was flexibility in managing SPIMS with
regard to tractors in the pull system. This led to narrowing down the population to be considered
for research.
Out of a total of 2200 components, 800 components in pull category were considered for
further research and analysis. The spare parts under pull category were segregated accordingly to
ABC analysis. Items with high cost were categorized under ‘A’ class items, items with medium
cost were categorized under ‘B’ class items and items with low cost were categorized under ‘C’
class items. A sample of 45 spare parts (15 critical items under each category of A, B and C)
items in the inventory management system were taken after careful deliberations and discussions
with the dealers on issues related to:
 Cost
 Demand
 Inventory turnover
 Critical spare parts as specified by dealers
The Company had its own spare part software. Ordering of spare parts was done online by the
computers, and the orders were placed only through company software.

4.2 Ordering of Spare Parts

There was no proper forecasting system followed by the dealers, ordering of spare parts was
totally intuition based or knowledge based. No proper forecasting was done as the demand was
raised the spare parts were ordered depending upon the needs.
Table 4.2 Types of Orders Placed
Sr. No. Type of Order Duration in Days
1 BDT Order 7-8
2 Commercial Order 15-20
3 Emergency Order 10-12

Mostly the commercial order was placed by the dealers, in case of any emergency or any other
reason the BDT or emergency orders were placed. The data for validating the work was
considered as the commercial order data.

24
 Table 4.3: Discount Terms on Type of Order Placed
FES Parts Discount Terms Freight Terms
BDT Order MRP-25% Freight Paid
All Commercial Orders MRP-32% Freight Paid
Emergency Order MRP-25% Freight Paid

Table 4.4: Order Validity

FES Parts Terms
Regular Commercial Order 30 Days from the date Registration of Order
BDT / Emergency Parts Order Until Complete Execution

4.3 Data Redundancy

Data redundancy in SPIMS is the field that was repeated in two or more tables. There was large
problem of data redundancy in SPIMS.

Table 4.5: Data Redundancy

Sr. No. Part No Part Name
1 006502654C1 ADAPTOR SPLIN 4TH SPD DRVN GEAR
2 000031119B12 ADAPTOR SPLIN 4TH SPD DRVN GEAR
3 M06502654C1 ADAPTOR SPLIN 4TH SPD DRVN GEAR
4 006502306C3 AIR BREATHER
5 006507334B1 AIR BREATHER
6 006502306C2 AIR BREATHER
7 006502306C1 AIR BREATHER
8 005556008R91 AIR CLEANER CPTE
9 001231598R91 AIR CLEANER CPTE
10 000011105P02 AIR CLEANER CPTE

25
These were some parts taken from the FES price list provided by the company, which have same
material description but different part numbers

4.4 Transportation
Transportation of spare parts was only through courier. No return policy was followed by the
company, orders were returned only in the case of wrong deliveries. Spare parts can be order on
daily basis or when required.

4.5 Identification of Problem:

 Lead time was more, as parts were procured from the single central warehouse and there
was no local warehouse.
 Stock out cost leading to customer dissatisfaction and losing the reputation of the
company.
 Minimum and maximum levels of inventory were not controlled, as some parts were
stocked in excess and some parts were falling below the desired level of inventory.
 Problem of obsolete spares and non moving items, as some parts gets deteriorated on the
shelf and non moving parts were holding the inventory cost.
 Spurious spare parts were affecting the genuine spare parts, as in some cases the
customer purchases the spare parts from local vendors.
 Requirements were uncertain, as the requirements changed seasons to season resulting
from the usage of the product in different conditions.
 There was redundancy in products manufactured by the company, resulting to many
problems for maintaining accurate data.
 Documentation of inventory was not properly maintained.

4.6 Data Collection

The following data was collected from the dealers to carry out the study:
 Demand data of commercial years 2011-2012, 2012-2013, 2013-2014 was collected in
half yearly terms.
 Lead time data for spare parts was collected; lead time was the normal current
replenishment time.

26
  Selling price and cost price data, selling price was the cost at which customer purchases
the spare part and cost price was the price on which dealer procures the spare parts.
 Lost sale data, it was the data in which the shortages were faced by the dealers on the
particular item.
 Base stock and safety stock data, base stock data was the minimum stock that dealer was
maintaining and safety stock data was the maximum stock that dealer was maintaining.
 Carrying cost data, it refers to the total cost for holding inventory. (Appendix 1)

4.7 Data Analysis

The following data was analyzed from the collected data:
 Average demand data analyzed from the demand data of last three years.
 Deviation from the average demand calculated from last three years demand data.
 Average lead time data and the percentage of average lead time data.
 Total sales data of the spare parts.
 Total lost sales data and percentage lost sales data, which signifies the shortages of the
spare parts.
 Carrying cost percentage data, the cost held in carrying an item in inventory.
 Calculation of ordering points using proposed model and theoretical model.
 Inventory cost and carrying cost on spare parts.
After analyzing the data to percentage values for each parameter, the data was substituted in the
ordering model proposed by the authors. The sample list of spare parts has been given in
Appendix 2.

27
 CHAPTER 5
Results and Discussions

The calculations of order points using proposed model and theoretical model are provided in
Appendix 3 and Appendix 4 respectively.
From the study that was conducted on this company, the analysis of data yielded the
following results:
1. Comparison of order points of proposed model with the actual base stock of dealers.
(Appendix 5)
2. Comparison of order points of conventional model with the actual base stock of dealers.
(Appendix 6)
3. Comparison of order points of proposed model and orders point of conventional model.
(Appendix 7)
4. Comparison of inventory cost and carrying cost of dealers with proposed model and
conventional model. (Appendix 8 & 9)

5.1 Comparison of Order Points of Proposed Model With the Actual Base
Stock of Dealers :
After categorizing the spare parts and calculating the order points using proposed model, it was
concluded that results were significant from the actual method that dealers were practicing. The
results found that in ‘A’ class items 73% of ordering points were significant from actual base
stock of dealers using proposed model and remaining 27% results calculated by proposed model
were equal to actual base stock that dealers were maintaining. In class ‘B’ items using proposed
model 80% ordering points were significant from actual base stock of dealers and 20% of
ordering points were equal to the actual base stock of dealers. In class ‘C’ items 93% results
calculated using the proposed model were significant from the actual base stock of the dealers
and 7% results were same as that of dealers were practicing.

28
5.2 Comparison of Order Points of Conventional Model With the Actual Base
Stock of Dealers :
Results showed that in ‘A’ class items using theoretical model 66% results were significant from
the actual base stock provided by the dealers. 27% results showed that ordering points calculated
by theoretical model were same as provided by the dealers and 7% results indicated that order
point calculated by theoretical model should be raised from actual base stock of dealers. In ‘B’
class items 67% results were significant from actual base stock of dealers and 20% results
showed that ordering points calculated by theoretical model should be more than actual stock
kept by the dealers and 13% results indicated the same results of theoretical model and actual
stock maintained by the dealers. In ‘C’ class items 33% results indicated ordering points were
significant from the actual base stock provided by the dealers calculated by theoretical model are
less than the stock maintained by the dealers, 27% ordering point results calculated by theoretical
model were same as provided by dealers, and 40% results showed ordering point calculated
using theoretical model should be placed higher from the actual stock of dealers were
maintaining.

5.3 Comparison of Order Points of Proposed Model and Order Points of

Conventional Model :
In class ‘A’ items 60% of results were found to have same ordering points using proposed model
and theoretical model and 40% results were differentiating both the models. In class ‘B’ items
the results were same as that in case of ‘A’ class items. In class ‘C’ items 20% of results were
found be same using the proposed model and theoretical model and remaining 80% results were
found different on comparing the two models.

5.4 Comparison of Inventory Cost and Inventory Carrying Cost of Dealers

With Proposed Model and Conventional Model :
On comparing total inventory cost and carrying cost with the inventory cost and carrying cost of
proposed model and theoretical model for ‘A’ class items, results were found that proposed
model costs 60% of the total cost of inventory and carrying cost of the actual base stock provided
by dealers and the theoretical model costs 82% cost of dealers total inventory cost and carrying

29
cost. For ‘B’ class items results of total inventory cost and carrying cost for proposed model and
theoretical model were 50% and 94% respectively from the actual inventory cost and carrying
cost of dealers. For ‘C’ class items the total inventory cost and carrying cost for proposed model
and theoretical model are 41% and 93% respectively from the actual inventory cost and carrying
cost of dealers.

30
 CHAPTER 6
Conclusions and Future Scope

6.1 Conclusions:
The objective of the present study was to validate the model proposed, through a case study of
SPIMS of automobile dealers. Further, calculating the order points from the proposed model and
comparing with the order points of theoretical model. The following conclusions have been
drawn from the study:
 On comparing the results generated by the proposed model by Nagarur et al. (1994) and
the model used by the dealers, a significant difference in spare parts inventory was
observed. Drawing head to head comparison of items in the ‘A’ class category it was
observed that the inventory levels suggested by the model proposed by Nagarur et al.
(1994) were significantly lower in comparison to the model used by the dealers and some
results were showing the level of spare parts inventory should be same as the dealers
were maintaining, as discussed in the results.
 On comparing the results generated by the proposed model by Nagarur et al. (1994) and
the model used by the dealers, a significant difference in spare parts inventory was
observed. Drawing head to head comparison of items in the ‘B’ class category it was
observed that the inventory levels suggested by the model proposed by Nagarur et al.
(1994) were significantly lower in comparison to the model used by the dealers, and
some results were showing the level of spare parts inventory should be same as the
dealers and in some cases the results showed that inventory level of spare parts should be
raised to a certain level, as discussed in the results.
 On comparing the results generated by the proposed model by Nagarur et al. (1994) and
the model used by the dealers, a significant difference in spare parts inventory was
observed. Drawing head to head comparison of items in the ‘C’ class category it was
observed that the inventory levels suggested by the model proposed by Nagarur et al.
(1994) were not as significant as compared to ‘A’ class and ‘B’ class items, and some
results were showing the level of spare parts inventory should be same as the dealers and

31
 in some cases the results showed that inventory level of spare parts should be raised to a
certain level, as discussed in the results.
 From the results it has been concluded that proposed model gave more significant results
of order points as compared to the spare part inventory model of dealers. Also, resulting
in decreasing the inventory cost and inventory carrying cost.

6.2 Future Scope

As assumed by Nagarur et al. (1994) the demand remains relatively stable i.e. there are no
sudden jumps in the demand as a result the determination of maximum stock has been calculated
by summing up the economic order quantity and the maximum stock. The demand for spare parts
cab be abrupt, which would require addressing the contingency demand of spare parts in such a
scenario the maximum stock and minimum stock values may vary incorporating these variations
can be a part of future.
The order points were used to validate the model, and results were improved as compared to the
actual system followed by dealers in the pull system type of spare parts for controlling a portion
of inventory, a model should be proposed that may control the entire inventory system of spare
parts related to push system and pull system of spare parts.

32
 References

 Ahn, B.; Seo,K.(2005)A multi-item ordering model in the (s, S) inventory system.
International Journal Advance Manufacturing Technology, 28: 1196 – 1201.
 Botter, R.; Fortuin, L. (2000) Stocking strategy for service parts - a case study.
International Journal of Operations & Production Management. 20(6): 656 - 674.
 Braglia, M.; Grassi, A.; Montanari, R. (2004) Multi-attribute classification method for
spare parts inventory management. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 10(1)
55 - 66.
 Buker, D. W. (2001) Inventory Management and Control. Maynard’s Industrial
Engineering Handbook. Fifth edition. McGraw-Hill, 25 - 34.
 Cheung, C.F.; Chan, Y.L.; Kwok, S.K.; Lee, W.B.; Wang, W.M. (2006) A knowledge-
based service automation system for service logistics. Journal of Manufacturing
Technology Management, 17 (6): 750 - 771.
 Driessen, M. A.; Arts, J.; Van, H. G.; Rustenburg, W. D.; Huisman, B. (2010).
Maintenance spare parts planning and control: A framework for control and agenda for
future research. Beta Research School for Operations Management and Logistics.325:
31.
 Driessen, M.; Houtum, J.; Van, G. (2004) Maintenance spare parts planning and control a
framework for control and agenda for future research.
 Dubelaar, C.; Chow, G.; Larson, D. (2001) Relationships between inventory, sales and
service in a retail chain store operation. International Journal of Physical Distribution &
Logistics Management, 31(2): 96 - 108.
 Fortuin, L.; Martin, H. (1999) Control of Service Parts. International Journal of
Operations &Production Management, 19(9): 950 - 971.
 Gebauer, H.; Kucza, G.; Wang, C. (2011) Spare parts logistics for the Chinese market. An
International Journal, 18(6)748 - 768.
 Ghodrati, B.; Anders, P.; Kumar, U.(2007) Spare parts estimation and risk assessment
conducted at Choghart Iron Ore Mine. Journal of Quality in MaintenanceEngineering,
13(4): 353 - 363.

33
 Ghodrati, B.; Benjevic, D.; Jardine, A. (2012) Product support improvement by
considering system operating environment. International Journal of Quality & Reliability
Management, 29(4): 436 - 450.
 Ghodrati, B.; Kumar, U. (2005) Reliability and operating environment based spare parts
estimation approach. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 11(2): 169 - 184.
 Ghodrati, B.; Kumar, U. (2005a) Operating environment based spare parts forecasting
and logistics: a case study. International Journal of Logistics: Research and
Applications, 8(2): 95 - 105.
 Happonen, A. (2011) Doctoral Thesis Lappeenranta, Lappeenranta University of
Technology. Faculty of Technology Management. 180.
 Hassan, J.; Khan, F.; Hasan, M. (2012) A risk-based approach to manage non-repairable
spare Parts inventory. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 18(3): 344 - 362.
 Huiskonen, J. (2001) Maintenance spare part logistics: Special characteristics and
strategic choices. International Journal of Production Economics.71: 125 - 133.
 Juran, J.P.; Blanton, G.A. (1999) Juran’s Quality Handbook, 5th ed, McGraw-Hill, New
York. Goffin, K. (2000) Design for supportability: essential component of new product
development. Research-Technology Management, 43(2): 40 - 7.
 Kennedy, W. J.; Patterson, J.; Fredendall, L. D. (2002) An overview of recent literature
on spare parts inventories. International Journal of Production Economics.76: 201-215.
 Keshteli, M.; Sajadifar, M.; Haji, R. (2011) Spare parts logistics for the Chinese market.
International Journal Advance Manufacturing Technology, 55:831 - 841.
 Khairy, A.; Kobbacy, H.; Liang, Y. (1999) Towards the development of an intelligent
inventory management system. Integrated Manufacturing Systems 10(6) 354 - 366.
 Kott, G. (2008) Reliability and its application in the printing industry. Paper presented at
Proceeding of the International Maintenance Excellence Conference 2008 (IMEC2008),
Toronto, Canada.
 Kumar, D.; Klefsjo, B.; Kumar, U. (1992) Reliability analysis of power transmission
cables of electric mine loaders using the proportional hazard model. Reliability
Engineering& System Safety, 37(3) 3: 217 - 22.
 Kumar, D.; Knezevic, J. (1997) Spare optimization models for series and parallel
structures. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 3(3): 177 - 188.

34
 Kumar, S.; Chandra, C. (2001) Managing multi item common vendor inventory system
with random demands. International journal of physical distribution and logistics
management, 32(3): 188 - 202.
 Kumar, D.; Klefsjo, B.; Kumar U. (1992) Reliability analysis of power transmission
cables of electric mine loaders using the proportional hazard model. Reliability
Engineering& System Safety, 37(3): 217 - 22.
 Levi, S. D. (2004) Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering. 14(4): 387 - 401.
 Loomba, A.P.S. (1996) Linkages between product distribution and service support
functions. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management,
26(4): 4 - 22.
 Markeset, T.; Kumar U. (2003) Integration of RAMS and risk analysis in product design
and development work processes: a case study. Journal of Quality in Maintenance
Engineering, 9(4): 393 - 410.
 Nagarur, N.; San, T.; Baid, N. (1994) A Computer based Inventory Management System
for Spare Parts. Industrial Management& Data Systems, 94(9): 22 - 28.
 Connor, P.; (2002) Practical Reliability Engineering, 4th ed., Wiley, Chichester.
 Peres, F.; Grenouilleau, C. (2003)Spare parts supply modeling: application to a space
station. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 20(3): 360 - 377.
 Rausand, M.; Hoyland, A. (2004) System Reliability Theory: Models, Statistical
Methods, and Applications, 2nd ed., Wiley-Inter science, New York.
 Razmi, J.; Rad,R.; Sangari, M. (2010) Developing a two-echelon mathematical model for
a vendor-managed inventory system. International Journal Advance Manufacturing
Technology, 48: 773 – 783.
 Rego, J.; Mesquita, M. (2011) Spare parts inventory control -A literature review. 21(4):
656 - 666.
 Sheikh, A.K.; Younas, M.; Raouf, A. (2000) Reliability based spare parts forecasting and
procurement strategies. Modeling and Optimization, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 81-
108.
 Levi, S. D.; Kaminsky, P.; Simchi-Levi, E. (2004) Managing the Supply Chain: The
Definitive Guide for the Business Professional New York, McGraw-Hill. 308.

35
  Walker, J. (1997) Base stock level determination for insurance type spares. International
Journal of Quality& Reliability Management, 14(6): 569 - 574.
 Waters, D. (2009) Supply Chain Management: An Introduction to Logistics, Second
edition. New York, Palgrave Macmillan. 511.
 You, P. S.; Wu, M. T. (2006) Optimal ordering and pricing policy for an inventory
system with order cancellations. Optimal pricing and lot-sizing under conditions of
perishability, and partial backordering Management Science, 42(8): 1093 – 1104.

Web References

[1]http://www.productivity.in/knowledgebase/Plant%20Engineering/g.%20Spare%20Parts%20
Management.pdf
[2] file:///C:/Users/SONY/Downloads/--1389185806-2.%20Eng-The%20Spare%20Part-Noor-
Ajian%20Mohd-Lair%20(1).pdf
[3] http://usir.salford.ac.uk/19054/1/WP_408-11_Salford.pdf
[4] http://www.dcag.com/images/INVENT01.pdf

36
APPENDIX 1
Inventory carrying cost of dealers.

SR.NO INVENTORY CARRYING COST PERCENTAGE

1 Building cost 5
2 Material handling cost 3
3 Labor handling cost 2
4 Inventory investment cost 9
5 Scrap and obselence cost 2

Total inventory carrying cost was accounted to be 21%.

37
APENDIX 2

Sample list of demand in spare parts

2013- 2013-
PART NAME 2014(i) PART NAME 2014(ii)
ACRYLIC POWEROL SILVER 1.00 200LE PULL STOP ( 245 ) 1.00
ACRYLIC POWEROL SILVER 1.00 235 DI AIRFLOW LH 1.00
ADAPTOR SPLIN 1ST/2ND SPD GEAR 2.00 235 DI AIRFLOW RH 1.00
ADAPTOR SPLIN 1ST/2ND SPD GEAR 2.00 ACRYLIC POWEROL SILVER 1.00
ADAPTOR SPLIN 1ST/2ND SPD GEAR 4.00 ACRYLIC POWEROL SILVER 40.00
ADAPTOR SPLIN 1ST/2ND SPD GEAR 4.00 ACRYLIC POWEROL SILVER 10.00
ADAPTOR SPLIN 4TH SPD DRVN GER 1.00 ADAPTOR OIL LEVEL GAUGE-COMPACT 20.00
ADAPTOR SPLIN 4TH SPD DRVN GER 2.00 ADAPTOR OIL LEVEL GAUGE-COMPACT 5.00
ADAPTOR SPLIN 4TH SPD DRVN GER 2.00 ADAPTOR SPLIN 1ST/2ND SPD GEAR 2.00
AEROSOL PAINT - ACRYLIC GREY(SPARES) 1.00 ADAPTOR SPLIN 1ST/2ND SPD GEAR 2.00
AEROSOL PAINT - ACRYLIC GREY(SPARES) 10.00 AEROSOL PAINT - ACRYLIC GREY(SPARES) 1.00
AEROSOL PAINT - ACRYLIC GREY(SPARES) 5.00 AEROSOL PAINT - ACRYLIC GREY(SPARES) 20.00
AEROSOL PAINT - ACRYLIC GREY(SPARES) 1.00 AEROSOL PAINT - ACRYLIC GREY(SPARES) 1.00
AEROSOL PAINT - ACRYLIC GREY(SPARES) 1.00 AEROSOL PAINT - ACRYLIC GREY(SPARES) 10.00
AEROSOL PAINT - ACRYLIC GREY(SPARES) 20.00 AEROSOL PAINT - ACRYLIC GREY(SPARES) 1.00
AEROSOL PAINT - ACRYLIC GREY(SPARES) 20.00 AEROSOL PAINT - ACRYLIC GREY(SPARES) 20.00
AEROSOL PAINT - ACRYLIC GREY(SPARES) 2.00 AEROSOL PAINT - ACRYLIC GREY(SPARES) 25.00
AEROSOL PAINT - ACRYLIC RED(SPARES) 10.00 AEROSOL PAINT - ACRYLIC GREY(SPARES) 10.00
AEROSOL PAINT - ACRYLIC RED(SPARES) 10.00 AEROSOL PAINT - ACRYLIC GREY(SPARES) 10.00
AEROSOL PAINT - ACRYLIC RED(SPARES) 10.00 AEROSOL PAINT - ACRYLIC GREY(SPARES) 5.00
AEROSOL PAINT - ACRYLIC RED(SPARES) 20.00 AEROSOL PAINT - ACRYLIC RED(SPARES) 20.00
AEROSOL PAINT - ACRYLIC RED(SPARES) 20.00 AEROSOL PAINT - ACRYLIC RED(SPARES) 10.00
AIR CLEANER 3 STAGE- 235 DI 1.00 AEROSOL PAINT - ACRYLIC RED(SPARES) 10.00
AIRCLEANER FILTER PRIMARY 7`INCH 605 5.00 AIR INTAKE DUCT 605 BSIIIA 10.00
AIRCLEANER FILTER PRIMARY 7`INCH 605 20.00 AIRCLEANER FILTER PRIMARY 7`INCH 605 40.00
AIRCLEANER FILTER SAFETY 7`INCH 605 5.00 AIRCLEANER FILTER SAFETY 7`INCH 605 10.00
AIRCLEANER FILTER SAFETY 7`INCH 605 20.00 ARJUN MAIN WIRING HARNESS 2.00
AL RADIATOR ASSEMBLY 605 - TTR 1.00 ARJUN MAIN WIRING HARNESS 2.00
ARJUN LCD INSTRUMENT CLUSTER 1.00 ARJUN MAIN WIRING HARNESS 2.00
ARJUN MAIN WIRING HARNESS 2.00 ARJUN MAIN WIRING HARNESS 2.00
ARJUN MAIN WIRING HARNESS 1.00 ARJUN PULL TO STOP CABLE D 10.00
ARJUN MAIN WIRING HARNESS 3.00 ARJUN PULL TO STOP CABLE D 10.00
ARJUN PULL TO STOP CABLE D 12.00 ARJUN PULL TO STOP CABLE D 10.00
ARJUN PULL TO STOP CABLE D 10.00 ARJUN UPG. - FENDER ASSEMBLY LH-T 1.00

38
ARJUN UPGRADATION MAIN WIRE ARJUN UPGRADATION MAIN WIRE
1.00 1.00
HARNESS HARNESS
ARJUN UPGRADATION MAIN WIRE ARJUN UPGRADATION MAIN WIRE
3.00 2.00
HARNESS HARNESS
ARJUN UPGRADATION MAIN WIRE
ARM KNUCKLE STEERING LH 2.00 1.00
HARNESS
ARJUN UPGRADATION MAIN WIRE
ARM KNUCKLE STEERING RH 2.00 2.00
HARNESS
ASSEMBLY AIR FILTER (DONALDSON) 1.00 ARM CPTE ROCKER 8.00
ASSEMBLY AIR FILTER (DONALDSON) 1.00 ARM CPTE ROCKER 5.00
ASSEMBLY AIR FILTER (DONALDSON) 2.00 ASSEMBLY DIPSTICK 2WD 5.00
ASSEMBLY AIR FILTER (DONALDSON) 1.00 ASSEMBLY OIL PUMP (NEW65-CRE) 1.00
ASSEMBLY BALL JOINT (IMPORTED) 1.00 ASSEMBLY OIL PUMP (NEW65-CRE) 1.00
ASSEMBLY QUADRANT MTG BRACKET 3.00 ASSY CHECK CHAIN CPTE – CRE 2.00
ASSY CONNECTING TIE ROD REGULAR 1.00 ASSY CHECK CHAIN CPTE – CRE 1.00
ASSY GEAR SHIFTER LEVER 2.00 ASSY CONNECTING TIE ROD REGULAR 2.00
ASSY GEAR SHIFTER LEVER 1.00 ASSY FRONT GRILL COMPLETE 1.00
ASSY GEAR SHIFTER LEVER 2.00 ASSY GEAR SHIFTER LEVER 1.00
ASSY HOSE AIR CLEANER CI INT 4CYL L 1.00 ASSY GEAR SHIFTER LEVER 2.00
ASSY.PUMP CPT LUB OIL 1.00 ASSY HEAD AND SIDE LAMP MTG BKT-LH 1.00
ASSY.PUMP CPT LUB OIL 2.00 ASSY HEAD AND SIDE LAMP MTG BKT-LH 1.00
AXIAL BALL JOINT DANA H3 1.00 ASSY RADIATOR 605BS3A INLINE 1.00
BALL JOINT ASSY.- KNUCKLE ARM END 5.00 ASSY RADIATOR 605BS3A INLINE 1.00
BAZEL 1.00 ASSY RADIATOR 605BS3A INLINE 1.00
BEARING CLUTCH RELEASE CRPTO-TEX 2.00 ASSY RECOVERY BOTTLE 605 BS3A INLINE 1.00
BEARING LM48548/10 DANA H3 2.00 ASSY. PISTON COOLING Alt # 000020778E05 3.00
BEARING LM501349/10 DANA H3 2.00 AUX VALVE LEVER ASSY. CPTE. MPT 1.00
BELT FAN 10.00 AUX VALVE LEVER ASSY. CPTE. MPT 1.00
BOLT CYLINDER HEAD MOUNTING-12.9 10.00 AUX VALVE LEVER ASSY. CPTE. MPT 5.00
BOLT HEX G15.875X2.31X209.55X12.9 10.00 AUX VALVE LEVER ASSY. CPTE. MPT 1.00
BOLT HEX G15.875X2.31X69.85X8.8 20.00 AUX VALVE LEVER ASSY. CPTE. MPT 1.00
BOLT HEX G19.05X1.59X41.28X8.8 2.00 AUX VALVE LEVER ASSY. CPTE. MPT 1.00
BOLT HEXFL M6X1.00X20.5X8.8 10.00 BALL BEARING CONTROL VALVE 100.00
BOLT HEXFL M6X1.00X20.5X8.8 10.00 BALL G 22.2MM 641 50 456 20.00
BONNET LATCH ASSEMBLY 10.00 BALL JOINT ASSY.- CYLINDER END 4.00
BONNET LATCH ASSEMBLY 2.00 BALL JOINT ASSY.- CYLINDER END 4.00
BRACKET AIR CLEANER-ARJUN 2.00 BALL JOINT ASSY.- KNUCKLE ARM END 4.00
BRACKET AIR CLEANER-ARJUN 3.00 BAZEL 1.00
BRACKET AIR CLEANER-ARJUN 2.00 BEADING RUBBER FOR HOOD 5.00
BRACKET CPTE. REAR TOW-HOOK 1.00 BEARING CLUTCH RELEASE CRPTO-TEX 1.00
BRACKET CPTE. REAR TOW-HOOK 1.00 BEARING CLUTCH RELEASE CRPTO-TEX 1.00
BRACKET P.T.O. SHIFTER 2.00 BEARING CLUTCH RELEASE CRPTO-TEX 4.00
BRACKET P.T.O. SHIFTER 5.00 BEARING NEEDLE ROLLER 40 X 45 X 17 4.00
BRACKET STABILIZER MTG LH (2WD) 1.00 BEARING TRNS CONTR SFT RER-FAG 3.00

39
BRACKET STABILIZER MTG RH (2WD) 1.00 BELT FAN 10.00
BRACKET STUB PIPE SUPPORT 5.00 BELT V CRANK SHAFT PULLEY TO PUMP P 1.00
BRACKET STUB PIPE SUPPORT 10.00 BELT V CRANK SHAFT PULLEY TO PUMP P 1.00
BRACKET VALVE LEVER 1.00 BOLT CYLINDER HEAD MOUNTING-12.9 10.00
BRACKET VALVE LVR SFT FRT/REAR 2.00 BOLT CYLINDER HEAD MOUNTING-12.9 10.00
BRACKET_605 2.00 BOLT HEX G12.7X1.27X42.164X8.8 50.00
BRACKET_605 5.00 BOLT HEX G12.7X1.27X42.164X8.8 50.00
BRACKET_FUEL_FILTER_605BS3A 5.00 BOLT HEX G15.875X2.31X38.10X8.8 50.00
BRACKET_FUEL_FILTER_605BS3A 3.00 BOLT HEX M20X2.5X154X10.9 4.00
BRAKE PEDAL RETURN SPRING 10.00 BOLT HEXFL M6X1.00X20.5X8.8 10.00
BREATHER 2.00 BOLT HEXFL M6X1.00X20.5X8.8 10.00
BRG BALL 20X47X14 10.00 BOLT HEXFL M6X1.0X30.5X8.8 4.00
BRG BALL 20X47X14 5.00 BOLT HEXFL M8X1.25X130.9X8.8 12.00
BRG BALL 35X62X14 10.00 BONNET LATCH ASSEMBLY 1.00
BRG BALL 35X62X14 5.00 BONNET LATCH ASSEMBLY 5.00
BRG BALL 35X62X14 5.00 BONNET LATCH ASSEMBLY 5.00
BRG BALL 35X72X17 6.00 BONNET LATCH ASSEMBLY 1.00
BRG BALL 35X72X17 10.00 BONNET LATCH ASSEMBLY 1.00
BRG BALL 35X72X17 5.00 BONNET LATCH ASSEMBLY 3.00
BRG BALL 35X72X17 10.00 BONNET LATCH ASSEMBLY 5.00
BRG NDL RLR 1R 45X52X20 6.00 BONNET LATCH ASSEMBLY 5.00
BRG NDL RLR 1R 45X52X20 4.00 BRACKET P.T.O. SHIFTER 2.00
BRG THRUST K 66.8X35.525X19.446 20.00 BRACKET P.T.O. SHIFTER 3.00
BRACKET PULL TO STOP CABLE and TPS
BRG TPR RLR 62.00X30.00X21.25 10.00 1.00
MOUNTIN
BRG TPR RLR 62.00X30.00X21.25 10.00 BRACKET RAIL STOPPER 5.00
BRG TPR RLR 73.43X41.29X.21.43 10.00 BRACKET STUB PIPE SUPPORT 5.00
BRG TPR RLR 73.43X41.29X.21.43 10.00 BRACKET STUB PIPE SUPPORT 3.00
BUMPER-BONNET-H3 2.00 BRACKET STUB PIPE SUPPORT 5.00
BUNDI TUBE 6530 1.00 BRACKET STUB PIPE SUPPORT 3.00
BUSH BI-MET 28.033X30.975X25.00 12.00 BRACKET_FUEL_FILTER_605BS3A 4.00
BUSH BI-MET 29.000X32.025X24.50 12.00 BREATHER 30.00
BUSH BI-MET 29.000X32.025X24.50 16.00 BREATHER 20.00
BUSH NYLON 332 20 1190 10.00 BRG BALL 20X47X14 10.00
BUSH P T O SHAFT REAR 10.00 BRG BALL 20X47X14 10.00
BUSH STG KNCKL PVT PIN 8.00 BRG BALL 20X47X14 1.00
CABLE DECOMP ( 235 ) ( U/D ) 1.00 BRG BALL 20X47X14 1.00
CAP TANK RECOVERY 10.00 BRG BALL 35X62X14 5.00
CAP-FUEL TANK 10.00 BRG BALL 35X72X17 5.00
CASSET SEAL DANA H3 2.00 BRG BALL 50X80X10 4.00
CENTRALISED FORK F/R 1.00 BRG BALL 50X90X20 1.00

40
CIRCLIP : PISTON PIN – NEF 50.00 BRG BALL 50X90X20 1.00
CIRCLIP EXT - LUG 25 X 2 2.00 BRG BALL 50X90X20 2.00
CIRCLIP EXT - LUG 40 X 1.75 2.00 BRG BALL 60X110X22 4.00
CIRCLIP INT - LUG 26 X 1.5 25.00 BRG BALL 60X110X22 2.00
CIRCLIP INT - LUG 38 X 1.5 25.00 BRG BALL 60X110X22 3.00
CIRCLIP INT - LUG 38 X 1.5 25.00 BRG BALL 60X110X22 3.00
CIRCLIP INT - LUG 45 X 2 1.00 BRG BALL 65X120X23 4.00
CLAMP AIR CLEANER 5.00 BRG CYL RLR C 40X80X18 1.00
CLIP SPRING-H3 --RING ( 4WD ) 50.00 BRG NDL RLR 1R 20X28X20.2 3.00
CLOG INDICATOR 5.00 BRG NDL RLR 1R 30X38X20 4.00
COMPOUND ROLL PIN - DOUBLE PIN ASSEMBLY 20.00 BRG NDL RLR 1R 30X38X20 6.00
COMPOUND ROLL PIN - DOUBLE PIN ASSEMBLY 20.00 BRG NDL RLR 1R 30X38X20 8.00
COPPER WASHER 50.00 BRG NDL RLR 1R 45X52X20 4.00
COUPLING 2ND SPEED P T O GEAR 1.00 BRG NDL RLR 1R 45X52X20 6.00
COUPLING GEAR 4TH and DIRECT SPD 1.00 BRG THRUST K 66.8X35.525X19.446 20.00
COUPLING HIGH SPEED 20MnCr5 2.00 BRG THRUST K 66.8X35.525X19.446 5.00
COUPLING IDLER GEAR 1.00 BRG THRUST K 66.8X35.525X19.446 25.00
COUPLING IDLER GEAR 3.00 BRG TPR RLR 62.00X30.00X21.25 5.00
COUPLING IDLER GEAR 1.00 BRG TPR RLR 65.11X34.95X18.29 5.00
COUPLING MALE PRESSURE PIPE 5.00 BRG TPR RLR 73.43X41.29X.21.43 20.00
COUPLING MALE PRESSURE PIPE 5.00 BRG TPR RLR 73.43X41.29X.21.43 10.00
COUPLING MALE PRESSURE PIPE 10.00 BRG TRANS DRIVE SHAFT ONESIDE 3.00
COUPLING P T O SHAFT 2.00 BRG TRANS DRIVE SHAFT ONESIDE 4.00
COUPLING P T O SHAFT 1.00 BULK HEAD UNION WITH NUT- ARJUN 4.00
COUPLING P T O SHAFT 2.00 BUSH BI-MET 29.000X32.025X24.50 12.00
COUPLING P T O SHAFT 2.00 BUSH BI-MET 29.000X32.025X24.50 12.00
CRANKSHAFT CPTE W/DOWEL PINS- 575DI 1.00 BUSH CAM LINK 1.00
CRANKSHAFT CPTE.W/DOWEL PIN -265DI 1.00 BUSH FL 12.776X15.875X16.00 25.00
CYLINDER LINER WITH GRADING 16.00 BUSH FRT AXLE PIVOT PIN 6.00
CYLINDER SLEEVE FOR 88.9*110 STROKE ENGI 2.00 BUSH FRT AXLE PIVOT PIN 2.00
CYLINDER SLEEVE FOR 88.9*110 STROKE ENGI 1.00 BUSH STG KNCKL PVT PIN 12.00
DC PLUNGER OIL SEAL - THREE LIP 5.00 BUSH STG KNCKL PVT PIN 4.00
DC PLUNGER OIL SEAL - THREE LIP 10.00 CABLE HOUR METER BP 2.00
DECALS OF UPG BHOOMIPUTRA 265DI MKM LH 1.00 CAGE BULL PINION SHAFT BRG RH 1.00
DECALS OF UPG BHOOMIPUTRA 265DI MKM LH 1.00 CAM LINK SIDE SHIFT 1.00
DIA 450 FAN-NYLON6--7 BLDE-ARJUN650 1.00 CAM SHAFT - 2 CYL LS 10.00
DIA 450 FAN-NYLON6--7 BLDE-ARJUN650 2.00 CAP OIL FILLER WITH OIL SEAL 1.00
DIA 450 FAN-NYLON6--7 BLDE-ARJUN650 6.00 CAP OIL FILLER WITH OIL SEAL 5.00
DIA 450 FAN-NYLON6--7 BLDE-ARJUN650 1.00 CAP OIL FILLER WITH OIL SEAL 2.00
DIAPHRAGM SPRING DOUBLE CLUTCH SPAR 3.00 CAP OIL FILLER WITH OIL SEAL 2.00

41
APPENDIX 3
Results of order point using proposed model. Order point is denoted by O.P 1.

A Class items

SR.NO PART NAME D E L (D+E+L) (1+(D+E+L) Dem*LT O.P 1

1 GEAR CAMSHAFT 0.12 0.42 0.04 0.58 1.58 0.25 1
2 WATER PUMP ASSEMBLY 0.04 0.48 0.04 0.57 1.57 0.38 1
3 ASSLY PTO DRIVEN PLATE 6530(A3028PTV00) 0.52 0.09 0.04 0.65 1.65 0.78 2
4 ADAPTOR PLATE FOR HYDRAULIC LIFT 0.48 0.04 0.04 0.57 1.57 0.38 1
5 ALF-TRACTOR SEAT SLIDER 63 DEG. CMVRZS 0.45 0.06 0.04 0.56 1.56 1.72 3
6 ALTERNATOR A115. 0.5 0.04 0.04 0.58 1.58 5.08 9
7 AL RADIATOR WITH RECOVERY BOTTLE-2D 0.59 0.08 0.04 0.71 1.71 1.24 3
8 295 BS3A FLYWHEEL ASSEMBLY_CRPTO 0.58 0.07 0.04 0.69 1.69 2.25 4
9 AIR CLEANER DONALDSON FOR 75TC 0.75 0.09 0.04 0.8 1.80 0.71 2
10 DRIVEN PLATE ASSEMBLY 0.06 0.39 0.04 0.50 1.50 2.95 5
11 AL RADIATOR ASSEMBLY 605 – TTR 0.09 0.70 0.04 0.83 1.83 1.43 3
12 REAR AXLE-578 18 SPLINE 0.09 0.80 0.04 0.93 1.93 0.27 1
13 ASSEMBLY HOOD CPT. 4DI 0.68 0.07 0.04 0.79 1.79 0.83 2
14 Arjun Upg. - FENDER ASSEMBLY LH-TRACTOR 0.75 0.07 0.04 0.86 1.86 1.68 4
15 ASSY. POWER STEERING CE 0.44 0.10 0.04 0.58 1.58 0.34 1

B Class items

SR.NO PART NAME D E L (D+E+L) (1+(D+E+L) Dem*LT O.P 1

1 AIR INTAKE MANIFOLD 1.30 0.05 0.04 1.40 2.40 3.52 9
2 SHAFT REVERSE IDLER 0.10 0.44 0.04 0.58 1.58 2.25 4
3 COUPLING P T O SHAFT 0.10 0.45 0.04 0.60 1.60 0.36 1
4 PRESSURE PLATE FOR MAIN CLUTCH SPAR 0.07 0.28 0.04 0.39 1.39 2.95 5
5 PLATE CLUTCH DRIVEN 279.4MM –REPCO 0.07 0.68 0.04 0.79 1.79 1.23 3
6 HUB FRONT WHEEL (TIMKEN BRG) 0.09 0.85 0.04 0.98 1.98 0.49 1
7 PRESSURE PLATE-MAIN-ARJUN UPG CLUTCH 0.07 0.75 0.04 0.86 1.86 4.44 4
8 PTO SHAFT CENTRE – CRPTO 0.11 0.53 0.04 0.67 1.67 0.27 1
9 AIR FILTER 595 (DONALDSON) 1.36 0.04 0.04 1.45 2.45 3.13 8
10 ARJUN UPGRADATION MAIN WIRE HARNESS 0.08 0.56 0.04 0.68 1.68 0.34 1
11 ARJUN MAIN WIRING HARNESS 0.11 0.72 0.04 0.87 1.87 0.34 1
12 CON ROD ASSY. 0.12 0.98 0.04 1.14 2.14 0.14 1
13 CLUTCH PLATE ASSEMBLY 0.11 0.65 0.04 0.80 1.80 0.29 1
14 WATER PUMP LOW DISCHARGE 0.10 0.50 0.04 0.65 1.65 0.48 1
15 WATER PUMP (TIER 3) 0.10 0.68 0.04 0.82 1.82 0.30 1

42
C Class items

SR.NO PART NAME D E L (D+E+L) (1+(D+E+L) Dem*LT O.P 1

1 GASKET EXHAUST MANIFOLD 0.02 0.24 0.04 0.30 1.30 9.90 13
2 GASKET STUB PIPE 4 CYL NEF 0.02 0.19 0.04 0.25 1.25 9.02 12
3 SUCTION FILTER CONNECTION HOSE 0.08 0.35 0.04 0.47 1.47 2.39 4
4 TANK ASSEMBLY RECOVERY 0.06 0.71 0.04 0.81 1.81 0.81 2
5 SUCTION FILTER ASSY 0.01 0.43 0.04 0.48 1.48 15.05 23
6 OIL PRESSURE SWITCH 0.08 0.55 0.04 0.68 1.68 1.80 4
7 VALVE CPTE ISOLATOR 0.09 0.52 0.04 0.65 1.65 0.38 1
8 ENGINE OIL FILTER 0.01 0.57 0.04 0.63 1.63 14.18 24
9 SENSOR UNIT TEMPERATURE-PRICOL 0.08 0.47 0.04 0.59 1.59 1.23 2
10 AEROSOL PAINT - ACRYLIC GREY(SPARES) 0.03 0.80 0.04 0.87 1.87 4.33 9
11 SUCTION FILTER 0.11 0.93 0.04 1.09 2.09 0.29 1
12 TUBE STABILIZER--555/595 UPG(2 nos.) 0.06 0.18 0.04 0.28 1.28 0.70 1
13 SAFETY AIR ELEMENT 0.03 0.43 0.04 0.51 1.51 6.33 10
14 STEEL PLATE FOR OIB 0.09 0.77 0.04 0.91 1.91 2.24 5
15 SLEEVE CYLINDER - 432 CYL DI 0.08 0.52 0.04 0.64 1.64 1.31 3

43
APPENDIX 4
Calculation of order points using theoretical model.

B.S = base stock

S.S = safety stock

AVG DEM = average demand

AVG L.T = average lead time

D.D = Daily demand

O.P 2 = order point calculated using theoretical model

A Class items

SR.NO PART NAME B.S S.S AVG DEM AVG L.T D.D O.P 2
1 GEAR CAMSHAFT 1 3 3.0 15 0.02 1
2 WATER PUMP ASSEMBLY 3 5 4.7 15 0.03 1
3 ASSLY PTO DRIVEN PLATE 6530(A3028PTV00) 5 8 9.5 15 0.05 2
4 ADAPTOR PLATE FOR HYDRAULIC LIFT 1 3 4.7 15 0.03 1
5 ALF-TRACTOR SEAT SLIDER 63 DEG. CMVR Z-S 5 15 21.0 15 0.11 4
6 ALTERNATOR A115. 15 30 62.0 15 0.34 21
7 AL RADIATOR WITH RECOVERY BOTTLE-2D 4 12 15.2 15 0.08 3
8 295 BS3A FLYWHEEL ASSEMBLY_CRPTO 5 10 27.5 15 0.15 5
9 AIR CLEANER DONALDSON FOR 75TC 2 5 8.7 15 0.05 1
10 DRIVEN PLATE ASSEMBLY 10 15 36.0 15 0.20 8
11 AL RADIATOR ASSEMBLY 605 - TTR 10 30 17.5 15 0.10 6
12 REAR AXLE-578 18 SPLINE 2 5 3.3 15 0.02 1
13 ASSEMBLY HOOD CPT. 4DI 4 8 10.2 15 0.06 2
14 ARJUN UPG. - FENDER ASSEMBLY LH-TRACTOR 5 15 20.5 15 0.11 4
15 ASSY. POWER STEERING CE 1 2 4.2 15 0.02 1

44
B Class items

SR.NO PART NAME B.S S.S AVG DEM AVG L.T D.D O.P 2
1 AIR INTAKE MANIFOLD 15 20 43.0 15 0.23 12
2 SHAFT REVERSE IDLER 5 20 27.5 15 0.15 6
3 COUPLING P T O SHAFT 2 4 4.3 15 0.02 1
4 PRESSURE PLATE FOR MAIN CLUTCH SPAR 5 30 36.0 15 0.20 10
5 PLATE CLUTCH DRIVEN 279.4MM -REPCO 10 40 15.0 15 0.08 6
6 HUB FRONT WHEEL (TIMKEN BRG) 2 4 6.0 15 0.03 1
7 PRESSURE PLATE-MAIN-ARJUN UPG CLUTCH 10 40 54.2 15 0.30 20
8 PTO SHAFT CENTRE - CRPTO 2 5 3.3 15 0.02 1
9 AIR FILTER 595 (DONALDSON) 20 40 38.2 15 0.21 16
10 ARJUN UPGRADATION MAIN WIRE HARNESS 2 5 4.2 15 0.02 1
11 ARJUN MAIN WIRING HARNESS 2 4 4.2 15 0.02 1
12 CON ROD ASSY. 1 2 1.7 15 0.01 1
13 CLUTCH PLATE ASSEMBLY 1 2 3.5 15 0.02 1
14 WATER PUMP LOW DISCHARGE 2 4 5.8 15 0.03 1
15 WATER PUMP (TIER 3) 2 4 3.7 15 0.02 1

Class C items

SR.NO PART NAME B.S S.S AVG DEM AVG L.T D.D O.P 2
1 GASKET EXHAUST MANIFOLD 30 60 120.8 15 0.66 59
2 GASKET STUB PIPE 4 CYL NEF 25 50 110.0 15 0.60 45
3 SUCTION FILTER CONNECTION HOSE 5 25 29.2 15 0.16 8
4 TANK ASSEMBLY RECOVERY 2 5 9.8 15 0.05 2
5 SUCTION FILTER ASSY 30 50 183.7 15 1.00 45
6 OIL PRESSURE SWITCH 5 15 22.0 15 0.12 5
7 VALVE CPTE ISOLATOR 2 4 4.7 15 0.03 1
8 ENGINE OIL FILTER 100 200 173.0 15 0.95 57
9 SENSOR UNIT TEMPERATURE-PRICOL 5 10 15.0 15 0.08 3
10 AEROSOL PAINT - ACRYLIC GREY(SPARES) 30 50 52.8 15 0.29 27
11 SUCTION FILTER 3 5 3.5 15 0.02 1
12 TUBE STABILIZER--555/595 UPG(2 NOS.) 2 8 8.5 15 0.05 2
13 SAFETY AIR ELEMENT 20 50 77.2 15 0.42 36
14 STEEL PLATE FOR OIB 8 12 27.3 15 0.15 6
15 SLEEVE CYLINDER - 432 CYL DI 4 16 16.0 15 0.09 4

45
APPENDIX 5
Comparison of order point of proposed model with the actual base stock of dealers.

A Class items
SR NO PART NO PART NAME ACTUAL BASE STOCK ORDER POINT 1
1 003064085R3 GEAR CAMSHAFT 1 1
2 006004080C3 WATER PUMP ASSEMBLY 3 1
3 006505467C91 ASSLY PTO DRIVEN PLATE 6530(A3028PTV00) 5 2
4 000010493P03 ADAPTOR PLATE FOR HYDRAULIC LIFT 1 1
5 007605339B91 ALF-TRACTOR SEAT SLIDER 63 DEG. CMVR Z-S 5 3
6 000020605E05 ALTERNATOR A115. 15 9
7 006002554A91 AL RADIATOR WITH RECOVERY BOTTLE-2D 4 3
8 006011498B91 295 BS3A FLYWHEEL ASSEMBLY_CRPTO 5 4
9 006000251F1 AIR CLEANER DONALDSON FOR 75TC 2 2
10 006504375C91 DRIVEN PLATE ASSEMBLY 10 5
11 006003547C92 AL RADIATOR ASSEMBLY 605 – TTR 10 3
12 006004365F91 REAR AXLE-578 18 SPLINE 2 1
13 008000503B12 ASSEMBLY HOOD CPT. 4DI 4 2
14 007538821C91 ARJUN UPG. - FENDER ASSEMBLY LH-TRACTOR 5 4
15 007202640C92 ASSY. POWER STEERING CE 1 1

B Class items

SR NO PART NO PART NAME ACTUAL BASE STOCK ORDER POINT 1

1 006005408B1 AIR INTAKE MANIFOLD 15 9
2 006502649C1 SHAFT REVERSE IDLER 5 4
3 005552640R2 COUPLING P T O SHAFT 2 1
4 006500157C91 PRESSURE PLATE FOR MAIN CLUTCH SPAR 5 5
5 001099328R92 PLATE CLUTCH DRIVEN 279.4MM -REPCO 10 3
6 007500051C1 HUB FRONT WHEEL (TIMKEN BRG) 2 1
7 006510211C91 PRESSURE PLATE-MAIN-ARJUN UPG CLUTCH 10 4
8 006502460R1 PTO SHAFT CENTRE – CRPTO 2 1
9 006001512B91 AIR FILTER 595 (DONALDSON) 20 8
10 007700965C91 ARJUN UPGRADATION MAIN WIRE HARNESS 2 1
11 007700832C91 ARJUN MAIN WIRING HARNESS 2 1
12 006004203F91 CON ROD ASSY. 1 1
13 000703852R1 CLUTCH PLATE ASSEMBLY 1 1
14 007700335C91 WATER PUMP LOW DISCHARGE 2 1
15 006004367F94 WATER PUMP (TIER 3) 2 1

46
Class C items

SR NO PART NO PART NAME BASE STOCK ORDER POINT 1

1 000020026E05 GASKET EXHAUST MANIFOLD 30 13
2 000020567E05 GASKET STUB PIPE 4 CYL NEF 25 12
3 000704741R2 SUCTION FILTER CONNECTION HOSE 5 4
4 006002260C91 TANK ASSEMBLY RECOVERY 2 2
5 007205324B1 SUCTION FILTER ASSY 30 23
6 000013085P04 OIL PRESSURE SWITCH 5 4
7 003045102R21 VALVE CPTE ISOLATOR 2 1
8 006002508F1 ENGINE OIL FILTER 100 24
9 005551425R2 SENSOR UNIT TEMPERATURE-PRICOL 5 2
10 20.178 AEROSOL PAINT - ACRYLIC GREY(SPARES) 30 9
11 003044368R96 SUCTION FILTER 3 1
12 007200280C2 TUBE STABILIZER--555/595 UPG(2 NOS.) 2 1
13 006000456F1 SAFETY AIR ELEMENT 20 10
14 006506426C1 STEEL PLATE FOR OIB 8 5
15 005555531R1 SLEEVE CYLINDER - 432 CYL DI 4 3

47
APPENDIX 6
Comparison of order point 2 with the actual base stock of dealers.

Calculation of order point using theoretical model is considered as order point 2.

A Class items
SR NO PART NO PART NAME BASE STOCK ORDER POINT 2
1 003064085R3 GEAR CAMSHAFT 1 1
2 006004080C3 WATER PUMP ASSEMBLY 3 1
3 5
006505467C91 ASSLY PTO DRIVEN PLATE 6530(A3028PTV00) 2
4 1
000010493P03 ADAPTOR PLATE FOR HYDRAULIC LIFT 1
5 5
007605339B91 ALF-TRACTOR SEAT SLIDER 63 DEG. CMVR Z-S 4
6 15
000020605E05 ALTERNATOR A115. 21
7 4
006002554A91 AL RADIATOR WITH RECOVERY BOTTLE-2D 3
8 5
006011498B91 295 BS3A FLYWHEEL ASSEMBLY_CRPTO 5
9 2
006000251F1 AIR CLEANER DONALDSON FOR 75TC 1
10 006504375C91 DRIVEN PLATE ASSEMBLY 10 8
11 10
006003547C92 AL RADIATOR ASSEMBLY 605 - TTR 6
12 006004365F91 REAR AXLE-578 18 SPLINE 2 1
13 4
008000503B12 ASSEMBLY HOOD CPT. 4DI 2
14 5
007538821C91 ARJUN UPG. - FENDER ASSEMBLY LH-TRACTOR 4
15 1
007202640C92 ASSY. POWER STEERING CE 1

B Class items

SR NO PART NO PART NAME BASE STOCK ORDER POINT 2

1 15
006005408B1 AIR INTAKE MANIFOLD 12
2 006502649C1 SHAFT REVERSE IDLER 5 6
3 005552640R2 COUPLING P T O SHAFT 2 1
4 006500157C91 PRESSURE PLATE FOR MAIN CLUTCH SPAR 5 10
5 001099328R92 PLATE CLUTCH DRIVEN 279.4MM -REPCO 10 6
6 007500051C1 HUB FRONT WHEEL (TIMKEN BRG) 2 1
7 006510211C91 PRESSURE PLATE-MAIN-ARJUN UPG CLUTCH 10 20
8 006502460R1 PTO SHAFT CENTRE – CRPTO 2 1
9 20
006001512B91 AIR FILTER 595 (DONALDSON) 16
10 007700965C91 ARJUN UPGRADATION MAIN WIRE HARNESS 2 1
11 007700832C91 ARJUN MAIN WIRING HARNESS 2 1
12 006004203F91 CON ROD ASSY. 1 1
13 000703852R1 CLUTCH PLATE ASSEMBLY 1 1
14 007700335C91 WATER PUMP LOW DISCHARGE 2 1
15 006004367F94 WATER PUMP (TIER 3) 2 1

48
C Class items

SR NO
PART NO PART NAME BASE STOCK ORDER POINT 2
1 000020026E05 GASKET EXHAUST MANIFOLD 30 59
2 000020567E05 GASKET STUB PIPE 4 CYL NEF 25 45
3 000704741R2 SUCTION FILTER CONNECTION HOSE 5 8
4 006002260C91 TANK ASSEMBLY RECOVERY 2 2
5 007205324B1 SUCTION FILTER ASSY 30 45
6 000013085P04 OIL PRESSURE SWITCH 5 5
7 003045102R21 VALVE CPTE ISOLATOR 2 1
8 006002508F1 ENGINE OIL FILTER 100 57
9 005551425R2 SENSOR UNIT TEMPERATURE-PRICOL 5 3
10 20.178 AEROSOL PAINT - ACRYLIC GREY(SPARES) 30 27
11 003044368R96 SUCTION FILTER 3 1
12 007200280C2 TUBE STABILIZER--555/595 UPG(2 NOS.) 2 2
13 006000456F1 SAFETY AIR ELEMENT 20 36
14 006506426C1 STEEL PLATE FOR OIB 8 6
15 005555531R1 SLEEVE CYLINDER - 432 CYL DI 4 4

49
APPENDIX 7

Comparison of proposed model order point and theoretical model order point.

A Class items

SR NO
PART NO PART NAME ORDER POINT 1 ORDER POINT 2
1 003064085R3 GEAR CAMSHAFT 1 1
2 006004080C3 WATER PUMP ASSEMBLY 1 1
3
006505467C91 ASSLY PTO DRIVEN PLATE 6530(A3028PTV00) 2 2
4
000010493P03 ADAPTOR PLATE FOR HYDRAULIC LIFT 1 1
5
007605339B91 ALF-TRACTOR SEAT SLIDER 63 DEG. CMVR Z-S 3 4
6
000020605E05 ALTERNATOR A115. 9 21
7
006002554A91 AL RADIATOR WITH RECOVERY BOTTLE-2D 3 3
8
006011498B91 295 BS3A FLYWHEEL ASSEMBLY_CRPTO 4 5
9
006000251F1 AIR CLEANER DONALDSON FOR 75TC 2 1
10 006504375C91 DRIVEN PLATE ASSEMBLY 5 8
11
006003547C92 AL RADIATOR ASSEMBLY 605 - TTR 3 6
12 006004365F91 REAR AXLE-578 18 SPLINE 1 1
13
008000503B12 ASSEMBLY HOOD CPT. 4DI 2 2
14
007538821C91 ARJUN UPG. - FENDER ASSEMBLY LH-TRACTOR 4 4
15
007202640C92 ASSY. POWER STEERING CE 1 1

B Class items

SR NO
PART NO PART NAME ORDER POINT 1 ORDER POINT 2
1
006005408B1 AIR INTAKE MANIFOLD 9 12
2 006502649C1 SHAFT REVERSE IDLER 4 6
3 005552640R2 COUPLING P T O SHAFT 1 1
4 006500157C91 PRESSURE PLATE FOR MAIN CLUTCH SPAR 5 10
5 001099328R92 PLATE CLUTCH DRIVEN 279.4MM -REPCO 3 6
6 007500051C1 HUB FRONT WHEEL (TIMKEN BRG) 1 1
7 006510211C91 PRESSURE PLATE-MAIN-ARJUN UPG CLUTCH 4 20
8 006502460R1 PTO SHAFT CENTRE - CRPTO 1 1
9
006001512B91 AIR FILTER 595 (DONALDSON) 8 16
10 007700965C91 ARJUN UPGRADATION MAIN WIRE HARNESS 1 1
11 007700832C91 ARJUN MAIN WIRING HARNESS 1 1
12 006004203F91 CON ROD ASSY. 1 1
13 000703852R1 CLUTCH PLATE ASSEMBLY 1 1
14 007700335C91 WATER PUMP LOW DISCHARGE 1 1
15 006004367F94 WATER PUMP (TIER 3) 1 1

50
C Class items

SR NO
PART NO PART NAME ORDER POINT 1 ORDER POINT 2
1 000020026E05 GASKET EXHAUST MANIFOLD 13 59
2 000020567E05 GASKET STUB PIPE 4 CYL NEF 12 45
3 000704741R2 SUCTION FILTER CONNECTION HOSE 4 8
4 006002260C91 TANK ASSEMBLY RECOVERY 2 2
5 007205324B1 SUCTION FILTER ASSY 23 45
6 000013085P04 OIL PRESSURE SWITCH 4 5
7 003045102R21 VALVE CPTE ISOLATOR 1 1
8 006002508F1 ENGINE OIL FILTER 24 57
9 005551425R2 SENSOR UNIT TEMPERATURE-PRICOL 2 3
10 20.178 AEROSOL PAINT - ACRYLIC GREY(SPARES) 9 27
11 003044368R96 SUCTION FILTER 1 1
12 007200280C2 TUBE STABILIZER--555/595 UPG(2 NOS.) 1 2
13 006000456F1 SAFETY AIR ELEMENT 10 36
14 006506426C1 STEEL PLATE FOR OIB 5 6
15 005555531R1 SLEEVE CYLINDER - 432 CYL DI 3 4

51
APPENDIX 8

Comparison of inventory cost of dealers, proposed model and conventional model.

Model 1 denoted as proposed model from research paper.

Model 2 denoted as theoretical model.

A Class items

SR.NO PART CODE PART NAME ACTUAL COST MODEL 1 MODEL 2

1 003064085R3 GEAR CAMSHAFT 2313 2313 2313
2 006004080C3 WATER PUMP ASSEMBLY 7247 2416 2416
3 006505467C91 ASSLY PTO DRIVEN PLATE 6530(A3028PTV00) 15677 6271 6271
4 000010493P03 ADAPTOR PLATE FOR HYDRAULIC LIFT 3403 3403 3403
5 007605339B91 ALF-TRACTOR SEAT SLIDER 63 DEG. CMVR Z-S 18589 11153 14871
6 000020605E05 ALTERNATOR A115. 58317 34990 81644
7 006002554A91 AL RADIATOR WITH RECOVERY BOTTLE-2D 15938 11953 11953
8 006011498B91 295 BS3A FLYWHEEL ASSEMBLY_CRPTO 20531 16425 20531
9 006000251F1 AIR CLEANER DONALDSON FOR 75TC 8663 8663 4332
10 006504375C91 DRIVEN PLATE ASSEMBLY 45983 22992 36786
11 006003547C92 AL RADIATOR ASSEMBLY 605 - TTR 48244 14473 28946
12 006004365F91 REAR AXLE-578 18 SPLINE 10552 5276 5276
13 008000503B12 ASSEMBLY HOOD CPT. 4DI 28333 14167 14167
14 007538821C91 ARJUN UPG. - FENDER ASSEMBLY LH-TRACTOR 37741 30192 30192
15 007202640C92 ASSY. POWER STEERING CE 14661 14661 14661
336192 199348 275449

Total inventory cost on A class items:

1. On actual stock provided by dealers is 336192(rupees)

2. On proposed model is 199348(rupees)
3. On theoretical model is 275449(rupees)

52
B Class items

SR.NO PART CODE PART NAME ACTUAL COST MODEL 1 MODEL 2

1 006005408B1 AIR INTAKE MANIFOLD 11288 6773 9030
2 006502649C1 SHAFT REVERSE IDLER 3822 3058 4586
3 005552640R2 COUPLING P T O SHAFT 1693 846 846
4 006500157C91 PRESSURE PLATE FOR MAIN CLUTCH SPAR 4753 4753 9506
5 001099328R92 PLATE CLUTCH DRIVEN 279.4MM -REPCO 9793 2938 5876
6 007500051C1 HUB FRONT WHEEL (TIMKEN BRG) 2496 1248 1248
7 006510211C91 PRESSURE PLATE-MAIN-ARJUN UPG CLUTCH 13552 5421 27104
8 006502460R1 PTO SHAFT CENTRE - CRPTO 3237 1618 1618
9 006001512B91 AIR FILTER 595 (DONALDSON) 35028 14011 28022
10 007700965C91 ARJUN UPGRADATION MAIN WIRE HARNESS 3503 1751 1751
11 007700832C91 ARJUN MAIN WIRING HARNESS 3804 1902 1902
12 006004203F91 CON ROD ASSY. 1940 1940 1940
13 000703852R1 CLUTCH PLATE ASSEMBLY 1953 1953 1953
14 007700335C91 WATER PUMP LOW DISCHARGE 3991 1996 1996
15 006004367F94 WATER PUMP (TIER 3) 4108 2054 2054
104960 52262 99434

Total inventory cost on B class items:

1. On actual stock provided by dealers is 104960(rupees)

2. On proposed model is 52262(rupees)
3. On theoretical model is 99434(rupees)

53
C Class items

SR.NO PART CODE PART NAME ACTUAL COST MODEL 1 MODEL 2

1 000020026E05 GASKET EXHAUST MANIFOLD 168 73 330
2 000020567E05 GASKET STUB PIPE 4 CYL NEF 193 92 347
3 000704741R2 SUCTION FILTER CONNECTION HOSE 105 84 168
4 006002260C91 TANK ASSEMBLY RECOVERY 202 202 202
5 007205324B1 SUCTION FILTER ASSY 4242 3252 6363
6 000013085P04 OIL PRESSURE SWITCH 746 596 746
7 003045102R21 VALVE CPTE ISOLATOR 332 166 166
8 006002508F1 ENGINE OIL FILTER 18060 4334 10294
9 005551425R2 SENSOR UNIT TEMPERATURE-PRICOL 903 361 542
10 20.178 AEROSOL PAINT - ACRYLIC GREY(SPARES) 7200 2160 6480
11 003044368R96 SUCTION FILTER 727 242 242
12 007200280C2 TUBE STABILIZER--555/595 UPG(2 NOS.) 592 296 592
13 006000456F1 SAFETY AIR ELEMENT 6286 3143 11315
14 006506426C1 STEEL PLATE FOR OIB 3276 2048 2457
15 005555531R1 SLEEVE CYLINDER - 432 CYL DI 2024 1518 2024
45055 18568 42267

Total inventory cost on C class items:

1. On actual stock provided by dealers is 45055(rupees)

2. On proposed model is 18568(rupees)
3. On theoretical model is 42267(rupees)

54
APPENDIX 9

Comparison of carrying cost on actual base stock of dealers, proposed model and conventional
model.

Carrying cost for actual base stock of dealers is denoted by C.C actual.

Carrying cost of proposed model is denoted by C.C model 1.

Carrying cost of theoretical model is denoted by C.C model 2.

A Class items

SR.NO PART CODE PART NAME C.C ACTUAL C.C MODEL 1 C.C MODEL 2
1 003064085R3 GEAR CAMSHAFT 486 486 486
2 006004080C3 WATER PUMP ASSEMBLY 1522 507 507
3 006505467C91 ASSLY PTO DRIVEN PLATE 6530(A3028PTV00) 3292 1317 1317
4 000010493P03 ADAPTOR PLATE FOR HYDRAULIC LIFT 715 715 715
5 007605339B91 ALF-TRACTOR SEAT SLIDER 63 DEG. CMVR Z-S 3904 2342 3123
6 000020605E05 ALTERNATOR A115. 12247 7348 17145
7 006002554A91 AL RADIATOR WITH RECOVERY BOTTLE-2D 3347 2510 2510
8 006011498B91 295 BS3A FLYWHEEL ASSEMBLY_CRPTO 4312 3449 4312
9 006000251F1 AIR CLEANER DONALDSON FOR 75TC 1819 1819 910
10 006504375C91 DRIVEN PLATE ASSEMBLY 9656 4828 7725
11 006003547C92 AL RADIATOR ASSEMBLY 605 - TTR 10131 3039 6079
12 006004365F91 REAR AXLE-578 18 SPLINE 2216 1108 1108
13 008000503B12 ASSEMBLY HOOD CPT. 4DI 5950 2975 2975
14 007538821C91 ARJUN UPG. - FENDER ASSEMBLY LH-TRACTOR 7926 6340 6340
15 007202640C92 ASSY. POWER STEERING CE 3079 3079 3079
70600 41863 58330

Total carrying cost on A class items:

1. On actual stock provided by dealers is 70600(rupees)

2. On proposed model is 41863(rupees)
3. On theoretical model is 58330(rupees)

55
B Class items

SR.NO PART CODE PART NAME C.C ACTUAL C.C MODEL 1 C.C MODEL 2
1 006005408B1 AIR INTAKE MANIFOLD 2370 1422 1896
2 006502649C1 SHAFT REVERSE IDLER 803 642 963
3 005552640R2 COUPLING P T O SHAFT 355 178 178
4 006500157C91 PRESSURE PLATE FOR MAIN CLUTCH SPAR 998 998 1996
5 001099328R92 PLATE CLUTCH DRIVEN 279.4MM -REPCO 2057 617 1234
6 007500051C1 HUB FRONT WHEEL (TIMKEN BRG) 524 262 262
7 006510211C91 PRESSURE PLATE-MAIN-ARJUN UPG CLUTCH 2846 1138 5692
8 006502460R1 PTO SHAFT CENTRE - CRPTO 680 340 340
9 006001512B91 AIR FILTER 595 (DONALDSON) 7356 2942 5885
10 007700965C91 ARJUN UPGRADATION MAIN WIRE HARNESS 736 368 368
11 007700832C91 ARJUN MAIN WIRING HARNESS 799 399 399
12 006004203F91 CON ROD ASSY. 407 407 407
13 000703852R1 CLUTCH PLATE ASSEMBLY 410 410 410
14 007700335C91 WATER PUMP LOW DISCHARGE 838 419 419
15 006004367F94 WATER PUMP (TIER 3) 863 431 431
22041 10975 20881

Total carrying cost on B class items:

1. On actual stock provided by dealers is 22041(rupees)

2. On proposed model is 10975(rupees)
3. On theoretical model is 20881(rupees)

56
C Class items

SR.NO PART CODE PART NAME C.C ACTUAL C.C MODEL 1 C.C MODEL 2
1 000020026E05 GASKET EXHAUST MANIFOLD 35 15 69
2 000020567E05 GASKET STUB PIPE 4 CYL NEF 40 19 73
3 000704741R2 SUCTION FILTER CONNECTION HOSE 22 18 35
4 006002260C91 TANK ASSEMBLY RECOVERY 42 42 42
5 007205324B1 SUCTION FILTER ASSY 891 683 1336
6 000013085P04 OIL PRESSURE SWITCH 157 125 157
7 003045102R21 VALVE CPTE ISOLATOR 70 35 35
8 006002508F1 ENGINE OIL FILTER 3793 910 2163
9 005551425R2 SENSOR UNIT TEMPERATURE-PRICOL 190 76 114
10 20.178 AEROSOL PAINT - ACRYLIC GREY(SPARES) 1512 454 1361
11 003044368R96 SUCTION FILTER 153 51 51
12 007200280C2 TUBE STABILIZER--555/595 UPG(2 NOS.) 124 62 124
13 006000456F1 SAFETY AIR ELEMENT 1320 660 2376
14 006506426C1 STEEL PLATE FOR OIB 688 430 516
15 005555531R1 SLEEVE CYLINDER - 432 CYL DI 425 319 425
9461 3899 8877

Total carrying cost on C class items:

1. On actual stock provided by dealers is 9461(rupees)

2. On proposed model is 3899(rupees)
3. On theoretical model is 8877(rupees)

57
58
59