0% found this document useful (0 votes)
84 views1 page

Rubric For Research

This document contains a rubric to evaluate an oral defense of a research proposal. The rubric has 5 categories: scientific thoughts and engineering goals, creativity and inventiveness, thoroughness, research skills, and oral presentation. Each category contains several criteria rated on a 5-point scale from strongly agree to strongly disagree. The rubric also includes space for comments and the evaluator's signature.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
84 views1 page

Rubric For Research

This document contains a rubric to evaluate an oral defense of a research proposal. The rubric has 5 categories: scientific thoughts and engineering goals, creativity and inventiveness, thoroughness, research skills, and oral presentation. Each category contains several criteria rated on a 5-point scale from strongly agree to strongly disagree. The rubric also includes space for comments and the evaluator's signature.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Title of Research Proposal: ______________________________________________________

Proponent/s: _______________________________ ________________________________


_______________________________ ________________________________
_______________________________
Rubrics for Oral Defense
5- STRONGLY AGREE
4- AGREE
3-UNDECIDED
2-DISAGREE
1- STRONGLY DISAGREE

CATEGORIES 1 2 3 4 5
1. The problem is concise and includes descriptor variables.
Scientific 2. The objectives are clear and relevant.
Thoughts and 3. The procedures are well-defined.
Engineering 4. The proposed solution is economically feasible.
Goals 5. The research has potential contribution/s and is practical value.
6. The proposal shows creative ability in the approach to solving the problem.
Creativity and 7. The proposal presents an innovative design or idea.
Inventiveness 8. The proposal shows the intelligence and imagination of the researchers in
finding ways to undertake the project.
9. The background of the study provides adequate information.
10. The supporting literature and studies are related to the study at hand.
Thoroughness 11. The reference list is broad enough to support the study and is in correct APA
format.
12. The scope and limitations are acknowledged by the researchers.
13. The methodology contains effectively, quantifiably, concisely organized
Research Skills information that allows the experiment to be replicated.
14. The materials and equipment used are innovatively selected.
15. The discussion was delivered with 5 minutes.
16. The discussion was clear and thorough.
Oral 17. The discussion was aided by a PowerPoint presentation or AV material.
Presentation 18. The PPT or AV material presented was concise and visually pleasing.
19. The proponents were confident and showed enthusiasm.
20. The proponents were able to answer the questions raised by the judges.
SUBTOTAL
OVERALL TOTAL

COMMENTS:____________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________
Signature

You might also like