Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 43 views

    Rubric For Research

    Uploaded by

    Charles Abellana
    This document contains a rubric to evaluate an oral defense of a research proposal. The rubric has 5 categories: scientific thoughts and engineering goals, creativity and inventiveness, thoroughness, research skills, and oral presentation. Each category contains several criteria rated on a 5-point scale from strongly agree to strongly disagree. The rubric also includes space for comments and the evaluator's signature.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Rubric For Research

    Uploaded by

    Charles Abellana
    43 views1 page
    This document contains a rubric to evaluate an oral defense of a research proposal. The rubric has 5 categories: scientific thoughts and engineering goals, creativity and inventiveness, thoroughness, research skills, and oral presentation. Each category contains several criteria rated on a 5-point scale from strongly agree to strongly disagree. The rubric also includes space for comments and the evaluator's signature.

    Original Title

    Rubric for Research

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document contains a rubric to evaluate an oral defense of a research proposal. The rubric has 5 categories: scientific thoughts and engineering goals, creativity and inventiveness, thoroughness, research skills, and oral presentation. Each category contains several criteria rated on a 5-point scale from strongly agree to strongly disagree. The rubric also includes space for comments and the evaluator's signature.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    43 views1 page

    Rubric For Research

    Uploaded by

    Charles Abellana
    This document contains a rubric to evaluate an oral defense of a research proposal. The rubric has 5 categories: scientific thoughts and engineering goals, creativity and inventiveness, thoroughness, research skills, and oral presentation. Each category contains several criteria rated on a 5-point scale from strongly agree to strongly disagree. The rubric also includes space for comments and the evaluator's signature.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    Title of Research Proposal: ______________________________________________________

    Proponent/s: _______________________________ ________________________________


    _______________________________ ________________________________
    _______________________________
    Rubrics for Oral Defense
    5- STRONGLY AGREE
    4- AGREE
    3-UNDECIDED
    2-DISAGREE
    1- STRONGLY DISAGREE

    CATEGORIES 1 2 3 4 5
    1. The problem is concise and includes descriptor variables.
    Scientific 2. The objectives are clear and relevant.
    Thoughts and 3. The procedures are well-defined.
    Engineering 4. The proposed solution is economically feasible.
    Goals 5. The research has potential contribution/s and is practical value.
    6. The proposal shows creative ability in the approach to solving the problem.
    Creativity and 7. The proposal presents an innovative design or idea.
    Inventiveness 8. The proposal shows the intelligence and imagination of the researchers in
    finding ways to undertake the project.
    9. The background of the study provides adequate information.
    10. The supporting literature and studies are related to the study at hand.
    Thoroughness 11. The reference list is broad enough to support the study and is in correct APA
    format.
    12. The scope and limitations are acknowledged by the researchers.
    13. The methodology contains effectively, quantifiably, concisely organized
    Research Skills information that allows the experiment to be replicated.
    14. The materials and equipment used are innovatively selected.
    15. The discussion was delivered with 5 minutes.
    16. The discussion was clear and thorough.
    Oral 17. The discussion was aided by a PowerPoint presentation or AV material.
    Presentation 18. The PPT or AV material presented was concise and visually pleasing.
    19. The proponents were confident and showed enthusiasm.
    20. The proponents were able to answer the questions raised by the judges.
    SUBTOTAL
    OVERALL TOTAL

    COMMENTS:____________________________________________________________________________________________
    ________________________________________________________________________________________________

    ____________________________________
    Signature

    You might also like