Decoding The ROE
Decoding The ROE
Chetan Chhabria
15
Decoding the ROE
Below is the definition of ROE taken from investopedia
“The amount of net income returned as a percentage of shareholders equity. Return on equity measures
a corporation's profitability by revealing how much profit a company generates with the money
shareholders have invested.
Net income is for the full fiscal year (before dividends paid to common stock holders but after dividends
to preferred stock.) Shareholder's equity does not include preferred shares.
It is very important to go beyond this formula and understand what really drives the ROE. Investors
following the above formula to compute ROE blindly are doing so at their own peril. I was recently going
through the book financial statement analysis and security valuation 4E by Stephen Penman and went
through the chapter that decodes the ROE. I strongly recommend people wanting to learn financial
analysis to buy this book and read it, however if people do not have time to go through nearly 700 pages
of text, I would request them to atleast go through the chapter that explains the drivers of ROE. It is by
far the best explanations on ROE that I have come across. In this article I am going to summarize my
learning and also apply my learning to an Indian company.
Where
What the above formula says is that the ROCE is driven by return on net operating assets (RNOA),
financial leverage (FLEV) and the spread between RNOA and Net borrowing cost. I am going to further
breakdown the RNOA (operating profitability) and leverage.
RNOA and its drivers
RNOA as the name suggests is the return on net operating assets and is calculated as below.
Drivers of RNOA
OPM = EBIT/Sales
Asset turnover also known as capital turnover is the efficiency measure and is calculated as below
Indicates how much sales does every 1$ of NOA produce. It measures the ability of the NOA to generate
sales.
Multiplying OPM with asset turnover results in the RNOA. Firms can have a higher OPM and a lower
asset turnover or a lower OPM and higher asset turnover. It is very rare that firms produce higher
RNOA’S through higher margins and higher turnovers. As to which of these drivers is high depends in the
industry in which the firm operates in. For example retailers have lower margins but higher asset
turnovers, likewise manufacturing/capital intensive businesses have higher margins but low turnover.
While analyzing a company one needs to check how other firms in the same industry stack up on these
two measures and see where the company that they are analyzing stand against the competition in the
industry.
Financial Leverage
Financial leverage is the degree to which net operating assets are financed by borrowing with net
financial obligations (NFO) or by common equity. Net financial obligation is the difference between
financial assets and financial liabilities. The below measure captures financial leverage.
FLEV = NFO/CSE
A closer look at the ROCE formula reveals that there are two things which go into the leverage part
1. Amount of leverage
2. Difference between RNOA and NBC known as the operating spread
If the firm has no leverage then the ROCE is equal to the RNOA. If the firm has leverage then the
difference between the ROCE and RNOA is determined by the amount of leverage and the operating
spread. If the firm’s RNOA is greater than the after tax NBC then the company enjoys a positive spread
and is said to have favorable financial leverage. If the spread is negative then leverage will not work for
the firm. Financial leverage only works and adds to the ROCE when the firm earns more on its operating
assets than it’s after tax borrowing costs.
There may be a situation where a company does not have net financial obligations (NFO) but has net
financial assets (NFA). In that case the below must be used
Where
RNFA = return on net financial assets and is calculated as net financial income/ NFA
In this case if there is positive spread between RNOA and RNFA, it reduces the ROCE. The reason being
that shareholder’s funds are invested in financial assets and if the financial assets earn less than the
operating assets, ROCE is less than the RNOA.
Operating liabilities can lever up the RNOA, just as financial liabilities lever up the ROCE.
OLLEV = OL/NOA
Operating liabilities reduce the investments required in operating assets. Firms have to invest that much
less in the business to the extent to which they have operating liabilities. Operating liabilities is like
credit extended by counterparties for which the firm do not have to pay any interest. However
counterparties may charge extra while selling their goods. Hence one needs to calculate the implied
interest on operating liabilities. Below is how operating liability leverage works.
Operating leverage spread = ROOA- short term interest rate after tax
The formula works the same way as it was for ROCE which was discussed in the earlier section. ROOA is
the unlevered return and return generated from operating liability leverage is added to this.
RNOA analysis
Operating profits of the company currently stand at 19%.Operating profitability is on the rise since FY09,
when it was 11%. The major driver for operating profitability to increase is due to decrease in raw
material costs. The major raw material for the company is rubber and prices of rubber have been falling
since a few years. RM costs as % of sales have fallen from 68% in FY09 to 49% in FY14, resulting in higher
gross margins for the company. Gross margins stood at 52% in FY14.
Asset turnover stands at 0.93 in FY14, it is down from 1.20 in FY09. This ratio indicates that for 1 RE of
net operating assets the company has generated 0.93 of sales. The reason for the decline is that the
company has finished capacity expansion at Bhuj Gujarat. The assets have been brought to the balance
sheet, however sales need to kick in. I believe this ratio should move up in the coming years, as sales will
also happen from the bhuj plant.
Tax rate of the company varies from 33-36%. I have calculated the tax rate by dividing the tax expenses
by earnings before tax to get the tax rate. Below is RNOA computed for Balkrishna Industries from FY09.
Balkrishna Industries
ROE Break up
2008- 2009- 2010- 2011- 2012- 2013-
09 10 11 12 13 14
FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14
Operating profit margins 11% 22% 14% 14% 17% 19%
Asset turnover 1.20 1.11 1.18 1.15 1.00 0.93
Tax 36% 34% 32% 33% 34% 33%
RNOA 8.37% 16.28% 11.30% 11.03% 10.86% 12.21%
Leverage analysis
Financial leverage as explained in the earlier section indicates the extent to which net operating assets
are financed by borrowing. The financial leverage of the company stood at 1.13 in FY14, meaning that
for every 1 RE of net operating assets there is 1.13 of net financial obligations. In this case debt is playing
a major role in financing the assets as compared to equity. This is also evident in the common size
balance sheet that I have prepared where liabilities constitute 62% of the total equity and liabilities.
There is fluctuation in the FLEV ratio since FY09, it has not been consistent. The management in their
concalls has indicated that they will retire all debt in the next 2-3 years and the company will be debt
free. Investors need to closely watch if the management walks the talk.
For calculating the net borrowing cost I have used the below formula
On close observation one can see that the interest expense reported by the company in the income
statement is minuscule when compared to the debt that they have on the balance sheet. The company
has reported a pretax interest expense of 27 Cr on a debt of 2400 Cr. This works out to only 1% on total
debt. On checking under the cash flow from financing activities, the company has reported 28 Cr of
finance cost. I believe the company is capitalizing the interest cost and adding it to the cost of PP&E. The
management has clarified in their concalls that interest on their debt is 3% as it has not been borrowed
in India. However interest even at 3% comes up to 72 Cr. While this needs further investigation, I have
assumed a NBC of 3% while calculating the operating spread.
Balkrishna Industries
ROE Break up
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14
It is very important for an investor to carry on this exercise while analyzing the ROE, it may be a lengthy
process but carrying out this extensive exercise will give a very good idea to the investor as to what is
driving the ROE of a firm.