HF-CRM Course Print-Outs February 2017: Flight Training Services
HF-CRM Course Print-Outs February 2017: Flight Training Services
HF-CRM Course Print-Outs February 2017: Flight Training Services
HF-CRM Course
Print-Outs
February 2017
Customer Services
FLIGHT TRAINING SERVICES
Copyright
This document must be used for training purposes only. Under no circumstances should this
document be used as a reference. No part of this manual may be reproduced in any form, without
the prior written permission of Airbus S.A.S.
This course was designed and developed by LMQ Ltd and Airbus S.A.S. It is for the use of
authorized Airbus staff only in delivering the course either internally or to their customers under
the terms of a License agreement.
Airbus S.A.S
1 Rond-Point Maurice Bellonte
31707
Blagnac Cedex
FRANCE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Communications ………….…............................................................ 4
Competencies and Grading...............................................................17
Human Factors..................................................................................20
AIRBUS PILOT INSTRUCTOR COURSE – HF-CRM COURSE © Copyright Airbus S.A.S. 2017
APIC CORE COURSE AIRBUS COMPETENCY BASED GRADING SYSTEM NON-TECHNICAL COMPETENCIES
WORD PICTURES
4. The pilot communicated effectively, by regularly demonstrating 4. The pilot led and worked as a team member effectively, by 4. The pilot solved problems and made decisions effectively, by
most of the performance indicators when required, which enhanced regularly demonstrating most of the performance indicators when regularly demonstrating most of the performance indicators when
safety and effectiveness required, which enhanced safety and effectiveness required, which enhanced safety and effectiveness
3. The pilot communicated adequately, by regularly demonstrating 3. The pilot led and worked as a team member adequately, by 3. The pilot solved problems and made decisions adequately, by
many of the performance indicators when required, which resulted regularly demonstrating many of the performance indicators when regularly demonstrating many of the performance indicators when
in a safe operation required, which resulted in a safe operation required, which resulted in a safe operation
2. The pilot led and worked as a team member at a marginal level, by 2. The pilot solved problems and made decisions at a marginal
2. The pilot communicated at a marginal level, by only occasionally
only occasionally demonstrating some of the performance level, by only occasionally demonstrating some of the performance
demonstrating some of the performance indicators when required,
indicators when required, which resulted in a reduction of safety indicators when required, which resulted in a reduction of safety
which resulted in a reduction of safety margin or effectiveness
margin or effectiveness margin or effectiveness
1. The pilot did not lead or work as a team member effectively, by 1. The pilot did not solve problems or make decisions effectively, by
1. The pilot did not communicate effectively, by rarely
rarely demonstrating few of the performance indicators when rarely demonstrating few of the performance indicators when
demonstrating few of the performance indicators when required,
required, which resulted in an unacceptable reduction in safety required, which resulted in an unacceptable reduction in safety
which resulted in an unacceptable reduction in safety margin
margin margin
4. The pilot’s situation awareness was good, by regularly 4 The pilot managed the workload effectively, by regularly
demonstrating most of the performance indicators when required, demonstrating most of the performance indicators when required,
which enhanced safety and effectiveness which enhanced safety and effectiveness
3. The pilot’s situation awareness was adequate, by regularly 3. The pilot managed the workload adequately, by regularly
demonstrating most of the performance indicators when required, demonstrating many of the performance indicators when required,
which resulted in a safe operation which resulted in a safe operation
2. The pilot’s situation awareness was at a marginal level, by only 2. The pilot managed the workload at a marginal level, by only
occasionally demonstrating some of the performance indicators occasionally demonstrating some of the performance indicators
when required, which resulted in a reduction of safety margin or when required, which resulted in a reduction of safety margin or
effectiveness effectiveness
1. The pilot’s situation awareness was not adequate, by rarely 1. The pilot did not manage the workload appropriately, by rarely
demonstrating few of the performance indicators when required, demonstrating few of the performance indicators when required,
which resulted in an unacceptable reduction in safety margin which resulted in an unacceptable reduction in safety margin
AIRBUS PILOT INSTRUCTOR COURSE – HF-CRM COURSE © Copyright Airbus S.A.S. 2017
APIC CORE COURSE AIRBUS COMPETENCY BASED GRADING SYSTEM NON-TECHNICAL COMPETENCIES
EXPLANATIONS
2 Marginally (But below standard) Occasionally Some Reduction in safety margin or effectiveness
1 Not effectively (Not standard) Rarely Few Unacceptable reduction in safety margin
Notes:
AIRBUS PILOT INSTRUCTOR COURSE – HF-CRM COURSE © Copyright Airbus S.A.S. 2017
Human Factors
- Decision
- Dexterity
- Distraction
- Awareness
Y
D
IT
EC
R
IS
TE
IO
EX
N
D
D
S
IS
ES
TR
EN
A
C
R
TI
A
W
O
N
A
AIRBUS PILOT INSTRUCTOR COURSE – HF-CRM COURSE © Copyright Airbus S.A.S. 2017