Scribd
Upload
74 views1 page

Rubric Marking For ISM Assignment

1. The document outlines grading criteria for an Integrated Systems Management course across four levels of achievement: Fail, Fair, Good, and Excellent. 2. The criteria cover four categories: acquisition of knowledge/application of concepts, quality of argument/reasoning, consistency of focus/overall quality, and a summary grade. Higher grades require stronger analysis, clearer contextualization, deeper discussion of issues, and evidence of independent research beyond required materials. 3. To receive an Excellent grade, a student must demonstrate in-depth analysis, apply concepts systematically to an organization, recognize competing perspectives, and show strong evidence of independent reading beyond core texts.

Uploaded by

Dipraj Kayastha
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
74 views1 page

Rubric Marking For ISM Assignment

1. The document outlines grading criteria for an Integrated Systems Management course across four levels of achievement: Fail, Fair, Good, and Excellent. 2. The criteria cover four categories: acquisition of knowledge/application of concepts, quality of argument/reasoning, consistency of focus/overall quality, and a summary grade. Higher grades require stronger analysis, clearer contextualization, deeper discussion of issues, and evidence of independent research beyond required materials. 3. To receive an Excellent grade, a student must demonstrate in-depth analysis, apply concepts systematically to an organization, recognize competing perspectives, and show strong evidence of independent reading beyond core texts.

Uploaded by

Dipraj Kayastha
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

BM051-3-M-ISM(Integrated Systems Managment)

Fail (0 -49 %) Fair (50 -64%) Good (65 -74%) Excellent (75%+ )
Acqusition of
knowledge/application of 0 - 19 20 - 25 26 - 29 30 - 40
concepts/research

Identifies and introduces a mostly Identifies and introduces an appropriate, clear,


Identifies and introduces a somewhat appropriate, conceptual context. Identifies and introduces an appropriate, clear concise and supported conceptual context. Objective
_____ appropriate, yet unclear and unsupported
Objective is identified and explicitly linked and concise conceptual context. Objective is is concisely introduced and explicitly linked to the
conceptual context. Objective not so clearly
40 linked to the task. Structure is introduced yet to the task. Structure is introduced. linked to the task. Structure is concisely task. Structure is concisely and accurately introduced.
Solutions proposed though largely introduced. Sound solutions proposed. Sound solutions or framework proposed and
incomplete. decriptive in nature. discussed thoroughly

Quality of
Argument/reasoning,depth of 0 - 22 23 - 29 30 - 33 34 -40
analysis/expansion of
ideas/argument & recognition of
wider context The focus of the question/problem/task is
understood and some identification of The focus of the question/problem/task is Concepts are well applied to the selected organisation
____ the issues in relation to the selected with an indepth analysis and interpretation of the
organisation.Issues discussed but some understood; key issues are understood and issues . This is presented using an appropriate
45 The problem/question/task required understood obvious areas to appraise may have been appliation of the concepts evident, with some structure and there is clarity in applying the concepts
but poor analysis of the issues. Detail lacking in analsyis and interpretation in the selected
most areas-big gaps in the critical appraisal of missed.Discussion of the issues may be organisation.. Analytical techniques/methods systematically and in an integrative manner. Theory
ISM issues. lacking in structure and clarity in some are theoretically informed; some awareness of and concepts are deployed in a manner which is
areas. Application of the concepts critically self-aware; ability to deploy
evident, with some analysis and competing alternatives analyses/perspectives/ competing/alternatives/analyses/perspectives/solutio
solutions is apparent.
ineterpretation in the selected ns is apparent.
organisation.

Consistency of Focus/overall
quality 0-7 8-9 10 - 11 12-15

Evidence of reading beyond core texts and Strong evidence of independent reading beyond core
Evicence of understanding of core texts materials. Acceptable evaluation and use of
_____ Evidence of having read texts and materials. and materials. Mostly adequate texts and materials. Critical use and evaluation of both
Attempted use of contemporary and theoretical evaluation and use of both contemporary both contemporary and theoretical contemporary and theoretical sources.Sections well
15 sources. Some elements of a structure are
present and theoretical sources.Some elements of sources.Sections well linked and well
organased, good flow and clarity of
linked and well organised, good flow and clarity of
presentation.
an appropriate structure are present. presentation.

You might also like