Directional and Non-Directional Tests
Directional and Non-Directional Tests
______________________________________________
Q: Is that all?
A: Yes, no wait. We also substituted t for z.
3. σ must be known.
a. This is a more serious limitation because it is
almost
zobs tobs
M 0 M 0
z obs t obs
/ n s/ n
Step 3: α = .05
Step 4: tcrit( = .05, df = 24) = ±2.064.
M 0 462.4 454
Step 5: tobs = s/ n = 16 / 25
Step 7:
Comparing tobs and tcrit: The Cracker Packer
______________________________________________
Oooh! She's angry!
______________________________________
Decreased sales
Statistical Hypotheses and the Rejection Region for
Directional tests: Decreasing Errors at the Drive-Thru
______________________________________________
Alternative Hypotheses
One-Tailed Two-Tailed
(n=25) (n=25)
Level Lower-Tail Upper-Tail
= .10 t< t> t<
or
t>
= .05 t< t> t<
or
t>
= .01 t< t> t<
or
t>
Are you more likely to reject the null for a one-tailed test
or a two-tailed test?
OR
OR
Two-Tailed Test
Ho: = 454
Ha: 454 Problem?
Finding tcrit for Directional Hypotheses
______________________________________________
Steps for conducting t-tests: including directional tests
______________________________________________
Step 4: = .05
Step 5: tcrit (α=.05, df = 24; 1-tailed) = -1.711.
M 0 3338 3500
Step 6: tobs = s/ n = 450 / 25
= -162 / 9 = - 1.8
Step 8:
Big Bad Lou as a Two-Tailed Test
______________________________________________
Step 4: = .05
Step 5: tcrit(α=.05, df = 24, 2-tailed) = -2.064.
Step 8:
______________________________________________
Ethics: Be judicious when making a choice.
Choose before you see your data!
Problems with the critical value method
______________________________________________
4) even
though – all things being equal – a lower p-value
implies a larger difference between M and µ0.BO
What is the easiest way to increase the p-value
of an experimental result?
______________________________________________
BO
= beatable offense
Effect sizes - Cohen’s D
______________________________________________
d
Cohen’s D = M
d M =
Cohen’s d Evaluation
0 < d < .2 Small
.2 < d < .8 Medium
d > .8 Large
Ho: = 900
Ha: 900 Critical z = 1.96
M 0
Observed z = s/ n
980 900
= 350 / 90
= 80 / 36.89 = 2.17
972.31 980
z = 350 / 90
Why no self-control?
We discount future gains against
Solution?
Impose costs on ourselves
Current experiment:
Will people impose costs (deadlines) on
themselves to reduce procrastination?
Will they choose optimal or effective deadlines?
Method:
Deadlines evenly spaced by experimenter, or up to
subjects
Results:
Self-imposed deadlines reduced performance, but
Interpretation:
People use deadlines to overcome procrastination
Are they effective? Optimal?