Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 89 views

    Firdausi Motion To Reconsider

    Uploaded by

    Fahad Firdausi
    Defendant Fahad Firdausi filed a motion to reconsider the court's ruling granting summary judgment for plaintiff SAS Holdings in an eviction case. Firdausi argues that (1) he is entitled to protections under the eviction moratorium order but his documentation expired, (2) as a pro se defendant, he did not understand legal procedures and should be given leniency, and (3) also as a pro se defendant, he did not understand discovery obligations and potential sanctions. He is seeking counsel to represent him and requests the court show leniency due to his pro se status against an adversary with legal representation.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Firdausi Motion To Reconsider

    Uploaded by

    Fahad Firdausi
    89 views3 pages
    Defendant Fahad Firdausi filed a motion to reconsider the court's ruling granting summary judgment for plaintiff SAS Holdings in an eviction case. Firdausi argues that (1) he is entitled to protections under the eviction moratorium order but his documentation expired, (2) as a pro se defendant, he did not understand legal procedures and should be given leniency, and (3) also as a pro se defendant, he did not understand discovery obligations and potential sanctions. He is seeking counsel to represent him and requests the court show leniency due to his pro se status against an adversary with legal representation.

    Original Title

    Firdausi Motion to Reconsider

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Defendant Fahad Firdausi filed a motion to reconsider the court's ruling granting summary judgment for plaintiff SAS Holdings in an eviction case. Firdausi argues that (1) he is entitled to protections under the eviction moratorium order but his documentation expired, (2) as a pro se defendant, he did not understand legal procedures and should be given leniency, and (3) also as a pro se defendant, he did not understand discovery obligations and potential sanctions. He is seeking counsel to represent him and requests the court show leniency due to his pro se status against an adversary with legal representation.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    89 views3 pages

    Firdausi Motion To Reconsider

    Uploaded by

    Fahad Firdausi
    Defendant Fahad Firdausi filed a motion to reconsider the court's ruling granting summary judgment for plaintiff SAS Holdings in an eviction case. Firdausi argues that (1) he is entitled to protections under the eviction moratorium order but his documentation expired, (2) as a pro se defendant, he did not understand legal procedures and should be given leniency, and (3) also as a pro se defendant, he did not understand discovery obligations and potential sanctions. He is seeking counsel to represent him and requests the court show leniency due to his pro se status against an adversary with legal representation.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 3

    STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURTS OF JUSTICE

    DISTRICT COURT DIVISION


    MECKLENBURG COUNTY CASE NO. 20 CVD 11657

    SAS Holdings, LLC,

    Plaintiff,

    v. MOTION TO RECONSIDER

    Fahad Firdausi,

    Defendant.

    Defendant hereby moves the Court to reconsider its ruling granting summary judgment to

    the Plaintiff. In support of this Motion, Defendant would show that:

    1. He is entitled to the benefit of the recent orders placing a moratorium on evictions.

    Defendant had previously filed the paperwork to demonstrate that entitlement and did not

    know that the documentation had an expiration date. Even though the original documents

    may have expired, Defendant still meets the requirements of the moratorium, and all

    parties or counsel to this matter knew or should have known that fact. Yet, even in the

    face of undeniable knowledge that Defendant had a right to obtain the benefit of the

    eviction moratorium, Plaintiff proceeded with the eviction nonetheless.

    2. Defendant was representing himself in this action, proceeding pro se. He did not fully

    know of the correct format to write reply paragraphs and reference correctly with

    numbering, He also did not know of the of the potential consequences or sanctions that

    the Court could impose. Defendant is in the process of securing counsel to represent him

    Page 1 of 3
    SAS Holdings, LLC v. Firdausi
    Motion to Reconsider
    in this proceeding. Defendant would respectfully request that, as a pro se party, he be

    shown the leniency that is appropriate and typical under those circumstances when his

    adversary is represented by a member of the Bar.

    3. Defendant was representing himself in this action, proceeding pro se. He did not fully

    understand the nature of discovery, his obligations in that process, or the potential

    consequences or sanctions that the Court could impose. Defendant is in the process of

    securing counsel to represent him in this proceeding. Defendant would respectfully

    request that, as a pro se party, he be shown the leniency that is appropriate and typical

    under those circumstances when his adversary is represented by a member of the Bar.

    This the 19th day of April 2021.

    BY: __________________________________
    Fahad Firdausi

    Page 2 of 3
    SAS Holdings, LLC v. Firdausi
    Motion to Reconsider
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

    The undersigned hereby certifies that he served upon the forgoing Motion by first class
    mail as follows:

    Andrew Gordon
    The Law Offices of Andrew L. Gordon, PLLC
    725 E. Trade Street, Ste 205
    Charlotte, NC 28202
    Attorney for Plaintiff

    This the 19th day of April 2021.

    ______________________________________
    Fahad Firdausi

    Page 3 of 3
    SAS Holdings, LLC v. Firdausi
    Motion to Reconsider

    You might also like