Algebra I m1 Topic C Lesson 14 Teacher
Algebra I m1 Topic C Lesson 14 Teacher
ALGEBRA I
Student Outcomes
Students learn if-then moves using the addition and multiplication properties of inequality to solve inequalities
and graph the solution sets on the number line.
Classwork
Exercise 1 (5 minutes)
Allow students time to work through the warm-up individually. Then, discuss the results. Let several students share
values that work. For each part of the exercise, demonstrate that these values still work for each new inequality.
Exercise 1
b. Should your four values also be solutions to the inequality 𝒙(𝒙 + 𝟒) ≥ 𝟓? Explain why or why not. Are they?
Yes. The inequality can be returned to its original form by using the distributive property, so the two are
equivalent.
c. Should your four values also be solutions to the inequality 𝟒𝒙 + 𝒙𝟐 ≥ 𝟓? Explain why or why not. Are they?
Yes. The terms on the left-hand side can be rearranged using the commutative property.
d. Should your four values also be solutions to the inequality 𝟒𝒙 + 𝒙𝟐 − 𝟔 ≥ −𝟏? Explain why or why not. Are
they?
Yes. 𝟔 was subtracted from both sides of the inequality. If the same principle of equality holds for
inequalities, then the original solutions should still work. (Make sure students confirm this with their answers
from (a)).
e. Should your four values also be solutions to the inequality 𝟏𝟐𝒙 + 𝟑𝒙𝟐 ≥ 𝟏𝟓? Explain why or why not. Are
they?
Yes. Both sides were multiplied by 𝟑. Using the same multiplication principle of Scaffolding:
equality, the solution set should not change. (Again, make sure students test this.)
Remind students about the
significance of the open circle
or solid circle on the endpoint
of the solution set.
While discussing parts (b) and (c), guide the class discussion to lead to the following conclusion:
Just like all our previous work on equations, rewriting an inequality via the commutative, associative, and
distributive properties of the real numbers does not change the solution set of that inequality.
Make the point that we are talking about >, <, ≥, and ≤.
While discussing (d), point out that it appears we are choosing to accept the addition (and subtraction) property of
inequality (if 𝐴 > 𝐵, then 𝐴 + 𝑐 > 𝐵 + 𝑐). Students have previously referred to this property as an if-then move.
Ask students to articulate the property as formally as they can; for example, “adding a value to each side of an inequality
does not change the solution set of that inequality.”
Conduct a similar discussion to those conducted in Lesson 12. Include the following:
Could the solution set to an inequality be changed by applying the commutative, associative, or distributive
properties to either side of an inequality?
No, the solution set would not change.
Could the solution set to an inequality be changed by applying the additive property of inequality?
No, the solution set would not change.
While discussing (e), make the same argument for multiplying both sides of an inequality by a positive value:
If 𝐴 > 𝐵, then 𝑘𝐴 > 𝑘𝐵 provided 𝑘 is positive.
This action also does not change the solution set of an inequality.
So, if 𝑥 is a solution to an inequality, it will also be a solution to the new inequality formed when the same
number is added to or subtracted from each side of the original inequality or when the two sides of the
original inequality are multiplied by the same positive number. This gives us a strategy for finding solution
sets.
Example 1 (2 minutes)
Work through the example as a class using the addition and multiplication properties of inequality.
Example 1
What is the solution set to the inequality 𝟓𝒒 + 𝟏𝟎 > 𝟐𝟎? Express the solution set in words, in set notation, and
graphically on the number line.
𝒒>𝟐
Point out to students that these are the only actions that we know do not affect the solution set.
1
Dividing both sides by 5 is still applying the multiplication principle (multiplying both sides by ).
5
Exercise 2 (6 minutes)
Allow students time to complete the problems individually and then pair up to compare responses.
Exercises 2–3
2. Find the solution set to each inequality. Express the solution in set notation and graphically on the number line.
𝒎
a. 𝒙+𝟒≤ 𝟕 b. +𝟖≠𝟗 c. 𝟖𝒚 + 𝟒 < 𝟕𝒚 − 𝟐
𝟑
𝒙≤𝟑 𝒎≠𝟑 𝒚 < −𝟔
3. Recall the discussion on all the strange ideas for what could be done to both sides of an equation. Let’s explore
some of the same issues here but with inequalities. Recall, in this lesson, we have established that adding (or
subtracting) and multiplying through by positive quantities does not change the solution set of an inequality. We’ve
made no comment about other operations.
a. Squaring: Do 𝑩 ≤ 𝟔 and 𝑩𝟐 ≤ 𝟑𝟔 have the same solution set? If not, give an example of a number that is in
one solution set but not the other.
No. In the first inequality, 𝑩 can equal 𝟔 or any number smaller. The second inequality can only equal
numbers from 𝟔 down to −𝟔. For example, 𝑩 = −𝟕 is not in the solution set.
b. Multiplying through by a negative number: Do 𝟓 − 𝑪 > 𝟐 and −𝟓 + 𝑪 > −𝟐 have the same solution set? If
not, give an example of a number that is in one solution set but not the other.
No. The first inequality has a solution of 𝑪 < 𝟑, and the second has a solution of 𝑪 > 𝟑. The number 𝟒, for
example, is a solution to the second but not the first inequality.
c. Bonzo’s ignoring exponents: Do 𝒚𝟐 < 𝟓𝟐 and 𝒚 < 𝟓 have the same solution set?
No. When both sides are squared, we end up introducing the possibility that 𝒚 can be negative but not less
than −𝟓. For example, 𝒚 = −𝟓 is a solution for the second inequality but not the first.
Recall that we have established that making use of the properties of inequalities:
If 𝐴 > 𝐵, then 𝐴 + 𝑐 > 𝐵 + 𝑐 for any real number 𝑐.
If 𝐴 > 𝐵, then 𝑘𝐴 > 𝑘𝐵 for any positive real number k.
Along with all the usual commutative, associative, and distributive properties, to rewrite an inequality does not
change the solution set of that inequality.
Any action different from these offers no guarantee that your work is yielding valid solutions. These may be
candidates you can use to check for solutions, but they must be checked (as we saw in the previous exercise).
The next two examples illustrate some more dangers.
Example 2 (2 minutes)
Work through the responses as a class, reminding students of dangers that were seen in Lesson 13.
Example 2
𝟔𝒙 + 𝟏𝟐 < 𝟑𝒙 + 𝟔
𝟔(𝒙 + 𝟐) < 𝟑(𝒙 + 𝟐) Apply the distributive property.
𝟏
𝟔<𝟑 Multiply through by .
𝒙+𝟐
a. Since the final line is a false statement, she deduced that there is no solution to this inequality (that the
solution set is empty).
MP.3
What is the solution set to 𝟔𝒙 + 𝟏𝟐 < 𝟑𝒙 + 𝟔?
𝒙 < −𝟐
Example 3 (3 minutes)
During the last exercise, we saw that when both sides were multiplied by −1, the solution set of the inequality
changed.
So, we cannot multiply through by −1 as this does not match the allowable operations given by the properties
of inequality. However, we can use the property: If 𝐴 > 𝐵, then 𝐴 + 𝑐 > 𝐵 + 𝑐 for any real number 𝑐. Can
MP.1 you figure out how to use this property in a way that is helpful?
Allow students time to work the problem, individually or in pairs, and then discuss the solution.
Example 3
−𝒒 ≥ −𝟕
𝟎 ≥ −𝟕 + 𝒒 Add 𝒒 to both sides.
Exercises 4–7
4. Find the solution set to each inequality. Express the solution in set notation and graphically on the number line.
c. 𝟔 − 𝒂 ≥ 𝟏𝟓 d. −𝟑(𝟐𝒙 + 𝟒) > 𝟎
𝒂 ≤ −𝟗 𝒙 < −𝟐
5. Use the properties of inequality to show that each of the following is true for any real numbers 𝒑 and 𝒒.
𝒑≤𝒒
𝟎. 𝟎𝟑𝒑 ≤ 𝟎. 𝟎𝟑𝒒
MP.2
𝟎. 𝟎𝟑𝒑 − 𝟎. 𝟎𝟑𝒑 − 𝟎. 𝟎𝟑𝒒 ≤ 𝟎. 𝟎𝟑𝒒 − 𝟎. 𝟎𝟑𝒑 − 𝟎. 𝟎𝟑𝒒
−𝟎. 𝟎𝟑𝒒 ≤ −𝟎. 𝟎𝟑𝒑
−𝟎. 𝟎𝟑𝒑 ≥ −𝟎. 𝟎𝟑𝒒
d. Based on the results from parts (a) through (c), how might we expand the multiplication property of
inequality?
6. Solve −𝟒 + 𝟐𝒕 − 𝟏𝟒 − 𝟏𝟖𝒕 > −𝟔 − 𝟏𝟎𝟎𝒕, for 𝒕 in two different ways: first without ever multiplying through by a
𝟏
negative number and then by first multiplying through by − .
𝟐
−𝟏𝟖 − 𝟏𝟔𝒕 > −𝟔 − 𝟏𝟎𝟎𝒕 𝟏 𝟏
− (−𝟒 + 𝟐𝒕 − 𝟏𝟒 − 𝟏𝟖𝒕) < − (−𝟔 − 𝟏𝟎𝟎𝒕)
−𝟏𝟔𝒕 + 𝟏𝟎𝟎𝒕 > −𝟔 + 𝟏𝟖 𝟐 𝟐
𝟐 − 𝒕 + 𝟕 + 𝟗𝒕 < 𝟑 + 𝟓𝟎𝒕
𝟖𝟒𝒕 > 𝟏𝟐
𝟗 + 𝟖𝒕 < 𝟑 + 𝟓𝟎𝒕
𝟏
𝒕> 𝟔 < 𝟒𝟐𝒕
𝟕
𝟏
<𝒕
𝟕
𝒙 𝟏
7. Solve − + 𝟖 < , for 𝒙 in two different ways: first without ever multiplying through by a negative number and
𝟒 𝟐
then by first multiplying through by −𝟒.
𝒙 𝟏 𝒙 𝟏
− +𝟖< −𝟒(− + 𝟖) > −𝟒 ( )
𝟒 𝟐 𝟒 𝟐
𝟏 𝒙 𝒙 − 𝟑𝟐 > −𝟐
𝟖− <
𝟐 𝟒 𝒙 > 𝟑𝟎
𝟏𝟓 𝒙
𝟒∙ < 𝟒∙
𝟐 𝟒
𝟑𝟎 < 𝒙
Closing (2 minutes)
What moves do we know do not change the solution set of an inequality?
What moves did we see today that did change the solution set?
Exit Ticket
1. Find the solution set to each inequality. Express the solution in set notation and graphically on the number line.
a. 6𝑥 − 5 < 7𝑥 + 4
b. 𝑥 2 + 3(𝑥 − 1) ≥ 𝑥 2 + 5
2. Fergus was absent for today’s lesson and asked Mike to explain why the solution to −5𝑥 > 30 is 𝑥 < −6. Mike said,
“Oh! That’s easy. When you multiply by a negative, just flip the inequality.” Provide a better explanation to Fergus
about why the direction of the inequality is reversed.
1. Find the solution set to each inequality. Express the solution in set notation and graphically on the number line.
a. 𝟔𝒙 − 𝟓 < 𝟕𝒙 + 𝟒
−𝟓 < 𝒙 + 𝟒
−𝟗 < 𝒙
b. 𝒙𝟐 + 𝟑(𝒙 − 𝟏) ≥ 𝒙𝟐 + 𝟓
𝟑𝒙 − 𝟑 ≥ 𝟓
𝟑𝒙 ≥ 𝟖
𝟖
𝒙≥
𝟑
2. Fergus was absent for today’s lesson and asked Mike to explain why the solution to −𝟓𝒙 > 𝟑𝟎 is 𝒙 < −𝟔. Mike
said, “Oh! That’s easy. When you multiply by a negative, just flip the inequality.” Provide a better explanation to
Fergus about why the direction of the inequality is reversed.
The multiplication property of inequality only applies when multiplying by a positive value. Otherwise, the addition
property must be used.
𝟎 > 𝟓𝒙 + 𝟑𝟎
−𝟑𝟎 > 𝟓𝒙
−𝟔 > 𝒙
Flipping the direction of the inequality is simply a shortcut for using the addition property.
1. Find the solution set to each inequality. Express the solution in set notation and graphically on the number line.
a. 𝟐𝒙 < 𝟏𝟎
{𝒙 real | 𝒙 < 𝟓}
b. −𝟏𝟓𝒙 ≥ −𝟒𝟓
{𝒙 real | 𝒙 ≤ 𝟑}
𝟐 𝟏
c. 𝒙≠ +𝟐
𝟑 𝟐
𝟏𝟓
{𝒙 real | 𝒙 ≠ }
𝟒
d. −𝟓(𝒙 − 𝟏) ≥ 𝟏𝟎
{𝒙 real |𝒙 ≤ −𝟏}
𝟐
2. Find the mistake in the following set of steps in a student’s attempt to solve 𝟓𝒙 + 𝟐 ≥ 𝒙 + , for 𝒙. What is the
𝟓
correct solution set?
𝟐
𝟓𝒙 + 𝟐 ≥ 𝒙 +
𝟓
𝟐 𝟐
𝟓 (𝒙 + ) ≥ 𝒙 + (factoring out 𝟓 on the left side)
𝟓 𝟓
𝟐
𝟓≥𝟏 (dividing by (𝒙 + ))
𝟓
So, the solution set is the empty set.
𝟐
The third line of the solution is incorrect. Since 𝒙 is a variable, we do not know whether 𝒙 + is positive, negative,
𝟓
𝟐
or zero. The correct solution to the given problem is 𝒙 ≥ − .
𝟓
𝒙 𝟓𝒙
3. Solve − + 𝟏 ≥ − , for 𝒙 without multiplying by a negative number. Then, solve by multiplying through by
𝟏𝟔 𝟐
−𝟏𝟔.
𝒙 𝟒𝟎𝒙 𝒙 𝟓𝒙
− +𝟏≥− −𝟏𝟔(− + 𝟏) ≤ −𝟏𝟔 (− )
𝟏𝟔 𝟏𝟔 𝟏𝟔 𝟐
𝟒𝟎𝒙 𝒙 𝒙 − 𝟏𝟔 ≤ 𝟒𝟎𝒙
− ≥ −𝟏
𝟏𝟔 𝟏𝟔 −𝟏𝟔 ≤ 𝟑𝟗𝒙
𝟑𝟗𝒙
≥ −𝟏 𝟏𝟔
𝟏𝟔 − ≤𝒙
𝟑𝟗
𝟏𝟔
𝒙≥−
𝟑𝟗
4. Lisa brought half of her savings to the bakery and bought 𝟏𝟐 croissants for $𝟏𝟒. 𝟐𝟎. The amount of money she
brings home with her is more than $𝟐. 𝟎𝟎. Use an inequality to find how much money she had in her savings before
going to the bakery. (Write the inequality that represents the situation, and solve it.)
𝒙
The inequality is 𝟐 < − 𝟏𝟒. 𝟐. The original savings amount must have been more than $𝟑𝟐. 𝟒𝟎.
𝟐