Journal of Physics: Conference Series

PAPER • OPEN ACCESS

Laser tracker calibration procedure at Central Office of Measures

To cite this article: M Winiewski 2018 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1065 082006

View the article online for updates and enhancements.

This content was downloaded from IP address 85.87.188.99 on 21/02/2021 at 21:35

XXII World Congress of the International Measurement Confederation (IMEKO 2018) IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1065 (2018) 082006 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1065/8/082006

Laser tracker calibration procedure at Central Office of

Measures

M Wiśniewski1
1
Laboratory of Length, Central Office of Measures, Elektoralna 2, 00-139 Warsaw,
Poland

E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract. A laser tracker is a portable coordinate measuring system that tracks a moving target
reflector and measures the position of the target in spherical coordinates the establishment of an
ASME B89.4.19 laser tracker verification facility at Central Office of Measures, Poland is
introduced. The set of laser wavelength calibration, environmental sensors calibration, ranging
tests, length measurement system tests and two-face system tests were performed to assess the
performance of instruments. For length measurement errors the Brunson Instrument Company
KinAiry laser tracker evaluation system was used. Example results from the tests were presented.

1. Introduction
The laser tracker is a portable coordinate measuring system. Laser trackers have become popular
measuring tools for users needing to make precision measurements for large volume metrology. Typical
applications of laser trackers include the measurement of aerospace assemblies, power plant structures,
civil engineering structures and terrestrial transportation vehicles.
Laser tracker is a polar coordinate measuring system. Laser tracker can work with stylus and
retroreflector combination (SRC), retroreflector or spherically mounted retroreflector (SMR). The radial
distance or range component is typically measured by an interferometer (IFM) or an absolute distance
meter (ADM). Azimuth and elevation angles of the target is determined by angle encoders on the
mechanism.
Operator can take points by touching the measured surface with SMR or SRC. The laser tracker is
automatically follow the movement of the retroreflector. The laser tracker transforms coordinates of
measured point from spherical (r, ) to cartesian (x, y, z) coordinate system.
As with any metrology tool, a laser tracker needs to be calibrated and its performance verified. The
most commonly used standard for laser tracker performance verification is ASME B89.4.19 [1]. The
B89.4.19 Standard describes performance tests for trackers that use a cooperative target such as a
retroreflector. The B89.4.19 Standard explicitly ensures metrological traceability of the test results using
traceable reference lengths employed in the evaluation procedure.
In this paper, we briefly review the performance tests in facilities at Central Office of Measures, and
discuss some results from B89.4.19 tests conducted on our tracker.

Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution
of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd 1
XXII World Congress of the International Measurement Confederation (IMEKO 2018) IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1065 (2018) 082006 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1065/8/082006

2. Laser tracker verification process at Central Office of Measures (GUM)

The Standard proposes a common set of ranging tests, length measurement system tests and two-face
system tests, which can be performed by manufacturers and users to assess the performance of their
instrument. Tests are sensitive to the different potential error sources, including errors resulting from
geometric misalignments within the tracker.

Figure 1. Laser wavelength calibration setup with Figure 2. 50 m test bench for calibration
optical frequency synthesizer. of steal tapes, rigid and semi rigid
measures, EDM’s, laser interferometers
and trackers.

Three test coincides with procedures used for calibrations of laser interferometers. The laser
wavelength calibration for trackers that have an IFM is made to determine laser frequency using a
frequency comparison against an optical frequency synthesizer shown in Figure 1.
The environmental sensors calibration (temperature, pressure and humidity) are made by comparison
against similar sensors which have been previously calibrated by GUM.
The ranging tests assess the distance measuring capability of the tracker along a purely radial
direction. capability of the tracker is tested on 50 m tape bench shown in Figure 2 [2]. The horizontal
and vertical rotation axes of the tracker remain stationary during this test in order to isolate the ranging
errors of the tracker from other error sources. The SMR is mounted on a carriage moved on rails on a
tape bench and the position of the carriage is measured using calibrated interferometer. The carriage is
moved to a series of locations.
The refractive index correction to the laser vacuum wavelength is calculated using measurements
made by environmental sensors of air temperature, pressure and humidity. The environmental conditions
during calibration are recorded. The facility is maintained at 20˚C±0.2˚C. The pressure, temperature,
and relative humidity sensors have expanded (k = 2) uncertainties of 20 Pa, 0.01˚C, and 1 % RH (relative
humidity) respectively. Temperature sensors are located every 2,5 meters. The expanded (k = 2)
uncertainty of reference length L is U(L) = 5 μm + 0.5 × 10-6L. The results from long ranging tests for
GUM’s Laser Tracker are summarised in Figure 3 for interferometer and in Figure 4 for ADM
measurements respectively. Blue lines are maximum permissible error (MPE) given by the
manufacturer.
Volumetric length tests are performed to assess the tracker’s ability to measure different lengths
within the work volume. Because these tests exercise the kinematic links in the tracker, they are sensitive
to most of the tracker’s geometric misalignments. The ASME B89.4.19 standard requires several tests
that rely on measuring a known reference length (artefact) and comparing the observed error (laser
tracker measured length minus reference length) with the specified maximum permissible error (MPE)
given by the manufacturer.

2
XXII World Congress of the International Measurement Confederation (IMEKO 2018) IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1065 (2018) 082006 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1065/8/082006

Figure 3. Interferometer ranging test results. Blue lines are maximum permissible
error (MPE) given by the manufacturer.

0,4
0,3
Range error (mm)

0,2
0,1
0
-0,1
-0,2
-0,3
-0,4
0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000
Range (mm)

Figure 4. ADM ranging test results. Blue lines are maximum permissible error (MPE)
given by the manufacturer.

Figure 5. Brunson Instrument Company KinAiry laser tracker evaluation system.

3
XXII World Congress of the International Measurement Confederation (IMEKO 2018) IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1065 (2018) 082006 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1065/8/082006

The main artefact (or reference length) is specified to be at least 2.3 m long. For length measurement
errors the Brunson Instrument Company KinAiry laser tracker evaluation system was used shown in
Figure 5. KinAiry is comprised of a carbon-composite, precision length artefact, mounted at heavy duty
rotary positioning device. Three nests are fixed on the surface of the tube at beginning, in the centre and
nominal separation of 2.31 m. The measurand is the point-to-point separation of the nests. The reference
length can be calibrated using the range measurement capability of the laser tracker, with the calibrated
value being established as a part of the test procedure. Three measurement runs are performer.
The measurements are partitioned according to the orientation of the reference length: horizontal
length measurement system test, vertical length measurement system test, right diagonal length
measurement system test, left diagonal length measurement system test. After that the entire tracker is
then rotated by 90˚ about the standing axis and measurements are made again. This process is repeated
for the 180˚ and 270˚ orientations of the tracker as well. Series of measurements are performed for 1,
3 and 6 m distance from the tracker to the reference length.
There are a number of geometric errors in a tracker that reverse in sign between front face and back
face measurements, when measurement is made after a 180-degree rotation about both the horizontal
and vertical axes. The front face and back face measurements are performed for each point during
volumetric test. The two-face test is performed using only the ADM. Example results for ADM
volumetric measurements are shown in Figure 6.

Figure 6. Volumetric length measurement system test results (ADM mode). Blue dash lines are
maximum permissible error (MPE) given by the manufacturer.

3. Conclusions
An overview of service for laser tracker performance verification at GUM has been described. The
descriptions of the different tests were given. Example results from the main volumetric test; the two-
face tests and ranging tests were also presented.

4. References
[1] ASME B89.4.19-2006: Performance Evaluation of Laser Based Spherical Coordinate
Measurement Systems, ASME, November 2006
[2] „Final report on supplementary comparison EURAMET.L-S20: Comparison of laser distance
measuring instruments”, Mariusz Wiśniewski, et al., Metrologia, Volume 51, Technical Supplement,
2014