Performance Apprisal NO LOGO
Performance Apprisal NO LOGO
INTRODUCTION
analysis. The content to be appraised may vary with the purpose of appraisal, and
position of employees.
TRADITIONAL METHOD:
Traditional method of performance appraisal has been used by companies for
very long time a common feature of this method is they are really relatively simple
and involve appraisal by one senior.
Assessment centers:
Assement centers (Ac) are places where the employee's are assessed on
certain qualities talents and skills which they posses. This method is used for
selection as well as for appraisal. The people who attend assessment centers
are given management games, psychological test, puzzles , questionnaires
about different management related situations etc. based on their performance
in these test an games appraisal is done.
Management objective:
In this method all members of the department starting from the target
goals to be achieved, plan for achieving these goals and work together to
achieve them. The senior in the department get an opportunity to observe
their junior-group efforts, communication skills, knowledge levels, interest
level etc. based on this appraisal is done.
Behavioral anchored rating scale:
In this method the appraisal is done to test the attitude of the employee
towards his job. Normally people with +ve approach or attitude view and
perform their job differently as compared to people with a -ve approach.
Psychological testing:
In this method clinically approved psychological test are conducted to
identify and appraise the employee. A feedback is given to the employee and
areas of improvement are identified.
Human resource audit/accounting:
In this method the expenditure on the employee is compared with the
income received due to the efforts of the employee. A comparison is made to
find out the utility of the employee to the organization. The appraisal informs
the employee about his contribution to the company and what is expected in
future.
7. 360* appraisal:
In this method of appraisal and all around approach is adopted. Feedback
about the employee is taken from the employee himself, his superiors, his juniors , his
collegiums, customers he deal with , the financial institutions and other people he
deals with etc. based on all these observations an appraisal is made and feedback is
given this is one of the most popular methods.
SVCET, Dept of Management Studies, ChittoorPage 7
A study on Performance Appraisal
6. Collective action:
The employee is given a chance or opportunity to improve himself in the
areas specified by the HR department.
The HR department constantly receives or keeps a check on the employee's
performance and notes down improvements in performance.
7. Implementation and review:
The performance appraisal policy is to be implemented on a regular basis. a
review must be done from time to time to check whether any change in policy is
required.
Importance of performance:
Performance appraisal is defined as the systematic description of employee's
job relevant, strength, weakness.
1. Feedback to the employees:
INDUSTRIAL PROFILE
DAIRY INDUSTRY
Dairy is a place where handling of milk and milk products is done and
technology refers to the application of scientific knowledge for practical purposes.
Dairy technology has been defined as that branch of dairy science, which deals with
the processing of milk and the manufacture of milk products on an industrial scale.
The dairy sector in the India has shown remarkable development in the past
decade and India has now become one of the largest producers of milk and value-
added milk products in the world.
The dairy sector has developed through co-operatives in many parts of the
State. During 1997-98, the State had 60 milk processing plants with an aggregate
processing capacity of 5.8 million litres per day. In addition to these processing
plants, 123 Government and 33 co-operatives milk chilling centers operate in the
State.
Also India today is the lowest cost producer of per litre of milk in the world, at
27 cents, compared with the U.S' 63 cents, and Japan’s $2.8 dollars. Also to take
advantage of this lowest cost of milk production and increasing production in the
country multinational companies are planning to expand their activities here. Some of
these milk producers have already obtained quality standard certificates from the
authorities. This will help them in marketing their products in foreign countries in
processed form.
The urban market for milk products is expected to grow at an accelerated pace
of around 33% per annum to around Rs.43,500 crores by year 2005. This growth is
going to come from the greater emphasis on the processed foods sector and also by
increase in the conversion of milk into milk products. By 2005, the value of Indian
dairy produce is expected to be Rs 10,00,000 million. Presently the market is valued
at around Rs7,00,000.
India contributes to world milk production rise from 12-15 % & it will
increase up to 30-35% (year 2020)
Sruthi Milk Dairy with 185 million cows and 154 million buffaloes. Have the
largest population cattle in the world. Total cattle population in the country as on
October 2010 stood at 339 million. More than 50% of buffaloes and 20% of cattle in
the world are found in India and most of these are milk cows and milk buffaloes.
Sruthi Milk dairy sector contributes a large share in agriculture gross domestic
products. Presently there are around 70,000 village dairy cooperatives across the
country. The cooperative societies are federated into 170 district milk producers
unions, which in turn have 22 state cooperative dairy federations. Milk production
gives employment to more leading producer of milk in the world followed by USA.
The milk production in 1999-00 estimated at 78 million metric tons as compared
expected to increase to 81 million metric tons by 2000-01. Of this total produce of 78
million cows’ milk constitute 6 million metric tones while rest is from other.
Although milk production has grown at a fast pace during the last three
decades milk yield per animal is very low. The main reasons for the low yield are:
India has become the world’s no.1 milk producing country. United States
where the milk production is anticipated to grow only marginally at 71 million tones,
occupied the slot till 1997. In the year 1997, India’s milk production was on par with
the U.S at 71 million tones.
India’s annual milk production has more than trebled in the last 30 years,
rising from 21 million tones in 1968 to an anticipated 80 million tones in 2001. This
braid growth and modernization is largely credited to contribution of dairy
cooperatives, under the operation flood (of) project, assisted by many multi-lateral
agencies, including the European union the world bank in the Indian context of
poverty and malnutrition’s, milk has a special role to play for its man notional
advantages as well as providing supplementary income to some 79 melon farmers in
over 500,000 remote villages.
Milk production grew by a mere 1% per annum, between 1947 and 1970.
Since the early 70's under operation flood, production growth increased significantly
averaging over 5% per annum.
About 75% of milk is consumed at the household level, which is not a part of
commercial dairy industry. Loose milk has a larger market in India as it is perceived
to be fresh by most consumers. In reality however. It poses a higher risk of
adulteration and contamination.
The production of milk products, that is milk products including infant milk
food, malted food, condensed milk and cheese stood at 3.07 lacks metric tons in 1999.
Production of milk powder including infant milk food has risen to 2.25lkh metric tons
in 1999, whereas that puff-malted food is at 65,000 metric tons cheese and condensed
milk production stands at 5000 and 11000 metric tons respectively in the same year.
MAJOR PLAYERS
Other private players include J.K.Dairy, Heritage Foods, Indian Dairy, and
Dairy Specialties etc. Amrut industries, once a leading player in the sector has turned
bankrupt and in facing liquidation.
EXPORT POTENTIAL
India has the potential to become one of the leading players in milk product
exports.
LOCATION ADVANTAGE
India is located amidst major milk deficit countries in Asia and Africa. Major
importers of milk and milk products are Bangladesh, China, Hong Kong, Singapore,
Thailand, Malaysia, Philippines, Japan UAD, Oman and other gulf countries, all
located close to India.
PRODUCTIVITY
To have an exportable surplus in the long term and also to maintain cost
competitiveness, it is imperative to improve productivity of Indian cattle.
PACKAGING TECHNOLOGY
The local milkman initially sold milk door to door. When the diary
cooperatives initially started marketing branded milk, it was sold in glass bottles
sealed with foil. Over the years several developments in packaging media have taken
place. In the early 80’s plastic pouches replaced the bottles. Plastic pouches made
transportation and storage very convenient, besides reducing costs. Mild packed in
plastic pouches/bottles have a shelf life of just 1-2 days, that too only if refrigerated.
FUTURE PROSPECTS
Sruthi Milk dairy sector is expected to triple its production in the next 10 years
in view of expanding potential for export to Europe and the West. Moreover with
WTO regulations expected to come into force in coming years all the developed
countries which are among big exporters today would are the withdraw the support
and subsidy to their domestic milk products sector.
DAIRY EQUIPMENTS
Designed with the aid of latest technology, our range of Dairy Equipment is
appreciated for optimum performance and durability. Offered at industry leading
price, these are widely in milk industry to store and process milk. We offer our range
in different specifications provided by our clients.
HOMOGENIZER
We are reckoned as one of the chief Dairy Homogenizer Manufacturers,
Exporters and Suppliers based in India. Made using superior quality raw material,
these Dairy Homogenizers are widely demanded in dairy industry due to their better
performance and high efficiency. The Dairy Homogenizers offered by us are widely
appreciated for enhancing the consistency of a product by dispersion. The Dairy
Processing Plants offered by us are known for upgrading the co lour, flavor and
appearance of the products and even avoid occurring of the ring formation.
Advantages :
DAIRY PRODUCTS
Utilizing our years of experience and advanced infrastructure, we offer our
clients Dairy equipment, which is in compliance with international quality standards.
In-built features, for better compatibility with continuous as well as batch mode of
process designing, makes it perfect choice for various industries such as food
processing and milk dairy.
INDUSTRIAL HOMOGENIZER
We are one of the leading manufacturers of Turn Key Liquid Milk Dairy
Plants or dairy processing plants, which are manufactured using superior quality raw
material. These are heavily demanded in dairy industry due to efficient performance
and cost effectiveness. Our range is equipped with in-built features to ensure proper
functioning.
MILK PASTEURIZERS
HTST continuous pasteurizers are extensively used for pasteurization of milk
and cream in dairy and food industries. Plate heat exchangers based pasteurizer offer
enormous convenience for processing milk, cream with flexibility, high thermal
efficiency and effective heat transfer. The system is compact, requires minimal space
and is very easy to expand capacity by adding additional plates.
PASTEURIZER
We are the largest manufacturer of high quality pasteurizing machine.
CREAM SEPARATOR
We are the largest manufacturer of high quality cream separator machines .It can
process 80 liters milk per hour.
Max. milk output, l/h 80
STORAGE TANK
We manufacture custom storage tanks for the chemical, pharmaceutical and
food process industries
MILK PUMP
We manufacturer and exporter of milk pump and dairy milk pump with high quality
and fully automatic
WEIGH BOWL
The superior quality of Weigh Bowl manufactured by our company is made from
good quality raw material which makes them durable.
REFRIGERATION SYSTEM
We are engaged in the supply of ice bank tank that are in high demand in the domestic
market. Manufactured from superior quality SS (304) these are used for dairy, chilled
milk tank, plate heat exchanger.
COLD ROOM
Carrier panels are manufactured in thickness of 60mm,80mm,100mm,120mm and
150mm.
Carrier offers indigenous equipments ranging from 1 HP to 5 HP for positive
temperature and 1.6 HP to 3.2 HP for negative temperature applications.
For larger refrigeration equipments, Carrier offers imported equipments from own
overseas factories and sourcing partners.
Carrier offers end to end solutions from farm to retail covering wide spectrum of
applications such as Pre-cooling, Blast freezer, IQF, Controlled
atmosphere/Modified atmosphere and large cold storages.
CONVEYOR
We are the largest manufacturing of high quality automatically operated conveyers.
Conveyor systems are used widespread across a range of industries. These systems
are commonly used in many industries, including the automotive, agricultural,
computer, electronic, food processing,[4] aerospace, pharmaceutical, chemical, bottling
and canning, print finishing and packing.
Types of conveyer systems are:
1. Belt conveyer
2. Flexible conveyer
3. Vertical conveyer.... etc
COMPANY PROFILE
SRUTHI MILK PRODUCT PVT.LTD. Was started in the year 2002 by
Mr.P.BABU REDDY, M.B.A Chairman. The managing director of the Sruthi Milk
Products Pvt.Ltd was S.NEERAJAKSHULU NAIDU M.B.A. SRUTHI MILK
PRODUCTS PVT. LTD. Was situated in NH – 4, Chennai – Banglore By Pass Road,
Chittoor Mandal, Chittoor (Dt.), Andhra Pradesh. An area where basic raw material
milk is available in plenty. The main function of the company is to procure the milk
(raw) in and around Sadum taluk and process the milk at factory, pack the processed
milk and supply in to the Chennai and Bangalore cities.
Toned Milk which is having 3% fat and have 8.55 of SNF (solid not fat) which
is available at Rs.13/- Per.ltr.
Full cream milk which is having 6.5% fat and have 9% of SNF (solid not fat)
which is available at Rs.16/- per.ltr.
2. Cream
3. Ghee
SRUTHI MILK PRODUCTS PVT. LTD. enjoys excellent reputation as a fair and
reliable of raw milk from dairy farmers.
QUALLITY CONTROL
The most significant aspect of Sruthi dairy is its quality products reflecting its
sound quality functions. It has well equipped laboratory with the sound work culture.
Recognizing quality as they key to prosperity the dairy has laid specific emphasis on
quality control operates with major functions like assessing commercial quality,
minimizing spoilages ensuring quality conformity milk and milk products, exercising
process controls, assessing sanitation, status of equipment, inspection of additives
formulation of standards and inspections of packaging materials, developing test
methods, stability and accelerated tests for quality guarantee of the products and
review of market complaints for improving the production practices.
Procurement
processing
Procurement
Production
Processing
Promotion
PROCUREMENT
PRODUCTION
PROCESSING
Processing products includes that the collected milk is stored and after storing
the milk is converted in to toned milk and full cream milk, ghee and cream is made
from the milk in the dairy.
PROMOTION
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
“Effective and efficient work, which also considers personnel data such as
measure of accidents, turn over, absence and tardiness.”
Communication takes place only when the transfer of information has taken
place and has been received and understood by the subordinates. Therefore, feedback
is necessary from the subordinate to the Manager.
system of evaluation and feedback. One of the first widely used system in industry
was knows as merit rating.
Purpose of appraisal
The appraisal interview as Anstey, Fletcher and Walker point out is this
difference from and other kinds of interviews.
Probably the simplest method of appraisal is to have the rates write a narrative
describing the employee’s strengths, weaknesses, past performance, potential, and
suggestions for improvement.
provides only qualitative data, and MRM decision improves when useful quantitative
data are generated. The later can be compared and ranked more objectively. However,
the Essay appraisal is a good start and is beneficial if used in conjunction with other
appraisal methods.
Ranking Method:
In this, the superior ranks his or her subordinates in the order of their merit,
starting from the best to the worst. This method is subject to the halo and central
tendency effects, although ranking by two or more ranker’s can be averaged to help
reduce biases. Its advantages include ease of administration and explanation.
The number of comparisons calculated with the help of a formula that reads
thus:
One of the oldest and most popular methods of appraisal is the graphic rating
scale. Graphic rating scales uses to assert factors such as quantity and quality of work,
job knowledge, co-operative, loyalty, dependability, attendance, honesty, integrity,
attitudes and initiative. However, this method avoids most valid abstract traits unless
defined in more specific behavioral terms, like loyalty or integrity.
The assessor goes down the list of factors and notes that point along the scale
and points that best describes the employee. These are typically five to ten points to
ensure that both the factors evaluated and the scale points are clearly understood and
unambiguous to the rater. Bias gets introduced when ambiguity occurs why graphic
rating scales are popular.
Though they do not provide the depth of information that essays are critical
incidents do, they are less time consuming to develop and administer, they permit
quantitative analysis and comparison, and, in contrast to the checklist, there is greater
standardization of items so comparability with other individuals in diverse job
categories is possible.
Check List:
In the check list, the evaluator uses a list of behavioral descriptions and checks
off those behaviors that apply to the employee. The Evaluator merely goes down the
list and gives “yes” or “no” responses. Once the check list is complete, it is usually
evaluated by the staff of personnel department, not the manager doing the check list.
Therefore, the raters do not actually evaluate the employee’s performances; he or she
merely records it. An analyst in the Personnel department then scores the checklist;
often weighting the factors in relationship to their importance. The final evaluation
can then be returned to the rating manager for discussion with the subordinate, or
some one from the personnel department can provide the feed back to the subordinate.
The checklist reduces bias similar to the rating and helps pick up the positive and
negative implications in each item, but even then, bias is introduced. From a cost
stand point, this appraisal method may be inefficient in them are a number of job
categories, became a check list of items must be prepared for each category.
key. This key should be validated so that management is in a position to say that
individuals with higher scores are better performing employees.
Critical Incidents:
This appraisal focuses the raters attention on those critical or key behaviors
that make the difference between doing a job effectively and doing it ineffectively.
The appraise write down little anecdotes, that describe what the employee did that
was especially effective of ineffective. A behaviorally based appraisal such as fluency
should be more valid than trait-based appraisal becomes it is clearly more job related.
Relative Standards:
These methods are relative rather than absolute measuring devices, the more
popular of the relative methods are group order ranking, individual ranking & paired
comparison.
Rating Scales:
This is the simplest and most popular techniques for appraising employee
performance. The typical rating-scale system consists of several numerical scales,
each representing a job-related performance criterion such as dependability, initiative,
out put attendances attitude, co-operation, and the like. Each scale ranges from
excellent to poor, the rater checks that appropriate performance level on each
SVCET, Dept of Management Studies, ChittoorPage 39
A study on Performance Appraisal
criterion, and then computes the employees total numerical score. The number of
points scored, linked to salary increase, whereby so many points equal arise of some
percentage.
Forced Distribution Method:
One of the errors in rating is leniency clustering a large number of employees
around a high point on a rating scale. The forced distribution method seeks to
overcome the problem by compelling the rater to distribute the rates on all points on
the rating scale. The method operates under an assumption that the employee
performance level conforms to normal statistical distribution.
Confidential Records:
Confidential records are mostly maintained in government departments,
though its application in the industry is not ruled out. TAMIN has followed this
method for a long time called The Annual Confidential Report (ACR), the approach
had 14 items
(i) Attendance,
(ii) Self-Expression (Written or oral),
(iii) Ability to work with others,
(iv) Leadership,
(v) Initiative,
(vi) Technical ability (job knowledge),
(vii) Ability to understand new material,
(viii) Ability to reason,
(ix) Originality and resourcefulness
(x) Areas of work that suits the person best,
(xi) Judgment,
(xii) Integrity,
(xiii) Responsibility and,
(xiv) Any defect – indebtedness, memo served.
Twelve of these are filled on a four-point grade scale (excellent, good, fair and
poor). For integrity, there are special instructions from the management.
Cost Accounting method:
This method evaluates performance from the monetary returns employee yield
to his organization.
usual comparative form used in this kind of evaluation are the ranking method and the
paired comparison method.
Future-Oriented Appraisal:
How an employee can perform in the days to come is equally important. This
can be assessed by focusing on employee potential or setting future performance
goals. The commonly used future-oriented techniques are MBO, psychological
appraisal , and assessment centers.
The first step is to establish the goals each subordinate is to attain. In some
organizations, superiors and subordinates work together to establish goals. In others,
superiors establish goals for subordinates. The goals typically refer to the desired
outcome achieved. These goals rewards, for the individual performance of both
managers (Performance Appraisal) and workers (merit rating ) are considered. These
schemes are necessary for systematic and equitable compensation, promotion and
development practices. The practical problems involved in applying the schemes, in
some detail. Top management involvement is advocated. The relationship between the
system used and the management climate with in the company is crucial, and this
aspect is explored in some depth.
Job evaluation provides a ranking of jobs and assists in establishing
appropriate differentials between base pay rates. An organization wants to encourage
good individual performance and equally employee’s welcome rewards for their own
particular success in carrying out the job.
There is little doubt that the majority of companies using it find the results
somewhat disappointing. It is not uncommon to hear of firms developing new systems
of appraisal every two or three year, as dissatisfaction with the existing method
grows. There appears to be several reasons for this dissatisfaction. Some critics say
that, although most of us really welcome a critical judgment. Others develop this to
say that few men, any way would wish to openly criticize their fellows respecting
their dignity as men more than their effectiveness as logs in the great wheel of
organization.
Probably the largest single criticism to appraisal methods however is the relative lack
of objective with which they have to be applied. Having agreed that the results of
performance appraisal often lead to disappointment so it is been conceded that some
form of assessment is essential.
In a typical training program, raters are shown a video tape of jobs being
performed and are asked to rate the worker. Ratings made by each participant placed
on a flip chart and the various errors are explained. Rater training in no way reduces
rating errors or improves appraisal accuracy. In practice, several factors including the
extent to which pay is tied to performance rating’s union pressure, employee turnover,
time constraints, and the needs to justify ratings may be more important than training.
This means that improving appraisal accuracy can, not just train but also reducing
outside factors such as union pressure and time constraints.
Rating committees
Even when a committee is not used, it is common to have the one who makes
the appraisal. This was found to be standard practice in it of 18 companies surveyed in
one study.
Self-Ratings:
Employees self-rating of performance are also sometimes used. The basic
problem with these is that employees usually rate themselves higher than they do
usually rate supervisors do or peers rate them.
Appraisal by subordinates
More firms today let subordinates anonymously evaluate their superiors
performance, a process many call upward feedback. When conducted throughout the
firm, the process helps top managers diagnose management styles, identify potential
‘people’ problems, and take corrective action with individual managers as required.
Such subordinates ratings are especially valuable when used for developmental rather
feedback from subordinates who identify themselves view the upward appraisal
process more positively than do managers who receive anonymous feedback.
However, subordinates are more comfortable giving anonymous responses and than
those who have to identify themselves at the backend to provide inflated ratings.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Definition of research:
Any effort which is directed to study the strategy needed to identify the
problem and selecting of best solution for best results is known as "Research".
Research methodology:
A system of models, procedures and techniques used to find the results of a
research problem is called "Research methodology".
Types of research design:
There are four types of research designs they are
• Exploratory
• conclusive
• Modeling
• Algorithmic
The conclusive research design is again divided into 2 types they are
• Experiment
• Descriptive
The research design is used for the study is the Descriptive research design. In this
design structural information is used to gather information.
Survey:
It is mechanism by which the sampling unit of study is selected from the
sampling frame of the population.
methods were accede to collect primary data by visiting organization premises and
various departments also by using questionnaire and direct interview with HR.
Secondary data collection:
It is collected for the internal records of the company such as trade journals,
various manuals of the company, various training programs previously conducted and
its response etc., it is also conducted from the officials of the organization.
CHI-SQUARE TEST
Generally speaking, the chi-square test is a statistical test used to examine
differences with categorical variables. There are a number of features of the social
world we characterize through categorical variables - religion, political preference,
etc. To examine hypotheses using such variables, use the chi-square test.
THE CHI-SQUARE TEST IS USED IN TWO SIMILAR BUT
DISTINCT CIRCUMSTANCES:
1. for estimating how closely an observed distribution matches an expected
distribution - we'll refer to this as the goodness-of-fit test
2. for estimating whether two random variables are independent
THE GOODNESS-OF-FIT TEST:
One of the more interesting goodness-of-fit applications of the chi-square test
is to examine issues of fairness and cheating in games of chance, such as cards, dice,
and roulette.
Since such games usually involve wagering, there is significant incentive for
people to try to rig the games and allegations of missing cards, "loaded" dice, and
"sticky" roulette wheels are all too common.
Unbeknownst to Turner, however, a casino statistician has been quietly
watching his rolls and marking down the values of each roll, noting the values of the
black and blue dice separately. After 60 rolls, the statistician has become convinced
that the blue die is loaded.
The key idea of the chi-square test is a comparison of observed and expected
values. How many of something were expected and how many were observed in some
process?
In this case, we would expect 10 of each number to have appeared and we
observed those values in the left column.
TESTING INDEPENDENCE:
The other primary use of the chi-square test is to examine whether two
variables are independent or not. What does it mean to be independent, in this sense?
It means that the two factors are not related.
Typically in social science research, we're interested in finding factors that are
related - education and income, occupation and prestige, age and voting behavior. In
this case, the chi-square can be used to assess whether two variables are independent
or not.
More generally, we say that variable Y is "not correlated with" or
"independent of" the variable X if more of one is not associated with more of another.
If two categorical variables are correlated their values tend to move together, either in
the same direction or in the opposite.
The expected value for each cell of the table can be calculated
using the following formula:
5-10Years 10 20%
10-15Years 20 40%
Total 50 100%
CHART: 2
45
Percentage
40
40
35
30
30
25
20
20 Percentage
15
10
10
0
0-5 Years 5-10 Years 10-15 Years More than 15 years
Interpretation:
From the above table, 30%of respondents working for 0-5 years, 40% working for
10-15 years and only 10%respondents are working more than 15 years.
Total 50 100%
CHART: 1
60
50
50
40
30
30 Percentage
20
20
10
0
Fully Aware Partially Aware Not all Aware
Interpretation:
From the above table, 70% of the respondents opined that the performance
appraisal system in the organization is based on objective setting and 30% of the
respondents opined that it is a combination of both formality and objective setting.
Qualitative 15 30%
Quantitative 0 0%
Total 50 100%
CHART: 3
Percentage
80
70
70
60
50
Percentage
40
30
30
20
10
0
0
Qualitative Quantitative Both(a)&(b)
Interpretation:
From the above table, 30% of the respondents opined that the performance
appraisal system aspect is qualitative and the remaining 70% responded as it is of both
qualitative and quantitative.
(Oi -Ej)2
_________
Observed Expected
S.No Frequency(Oi) frequency(Ej) (Oi -Ej) (Oi -Ej)2 Ej
1 15 16.6666 -1.6666 2.7775 1.6665
2 0 16.6666 -16.6666 277.7755 16.6665
3 35 16.6666 18.3334 336.1135 20.1689
Total 75.3374
Calculated value:75.3374
Degree of freedom: (n-1) = (3 - 1) = 2
The chi – square value at 0.05% level of significance at degree 2 of freedom is:
Hence calculated value is more than table value.
Ho rejected, Aspects of the performance Appraisal System.
Total 50 100%
CHART: 4
percentage
70
60
60
50
40 percentage
30
20 20
20
10
0
Traditional method Modern method Both (a) & (b)
Interpretation:
From the above table, 60% of the respondents opined as Traditional
method,20% as Modern method and 20% as both Traditional and modern method of
evaluating the performance.
Total 50 100%
CHART: 5(a)
Percentage
80
70
70
60
50
Percentage
40
30
20
20
10
10
0
Graphic Rating Method Ranking Method Paired Comarison Method
Interpretation:
From the above table,70% of the respondents opined as Graphic Rating
Scale,20% as Ranking Method and 10% as Paired Comparison Method.
Total 50 100%
CHART: 5(b)
Percentage
80
70
70
60
50
40
30
20
20 Percentage
10
10
0
Interpretation:
From the above table, 70% of the respondents opined as Human resource
accounting, 10% as Management by objectives and 20% as Productivity Measures.
Quarterly 5 10%
Annually 20 40%
Total 50 100%
CHART: 6
Percentage
60
50
50
40
40
Percentage
30
20
10
10
0
0
Quarterly Half yearly Annually Once in two years
Interpretation:
From the above table, 10% of the respondents opined as quarterly, 50% as
half yearly and 40% as annually.
Yes 30 60%
No 20 40%
Total 50 100%
CHART: 7
Percentage
70
60
60
50
40
40 Percentage
30
20
10
0
Yes No
Interpretation:-
From the above table, 60% of the respondents opined that they are informed
before they are appraised and 40% as they are not informed before they are
appraising.
Not at all 0 0%
Total 50 100%
CHART: 8
70
percentage
60
60
50
40
40
percentage
30
20
10
0
0
to a great extent to some extent not at all
Interpretation:
From the above table, 60% of the respondents opined that the satisfactory
level of job is to be great extent, 40% as to some extent.
Total 50 100%
CHART: 9
percentage
45
40
40
35
30
30
25 percentage
20
20
15
10
10
0
for rewards forcareer planning to set targets to review performance
Interpretation:
From the above table, 40% of the respondents opined that the objective of
performance appraisal system is for rewards, 20% as for career planning, 30% as to
set targets, 10 as to review performance.
Yes 30 60%
No 20 40%
Total 50 100%
CHART: 10
percentage
70
60
60
50
40
40 percentage
30
20
10
0
yes no
Interpretation:
From the above table, 60% of the respondents opined that they consider the
past performance and 40% as they won’t consider past performance.
Promotion 15 30%
Total 50 100%
CHART: 11
percentage
80
70
70
60
50
percentage
40
30
30
20
10
0
salaries and rewards promotion
Interpretation:
From the above table, 70% of the respondents opined that they joined for
salaries and rewards, and 30% for promotion.
(Oi -Ej)2
_________
Observed Expected (Oi (Oi
S.No Frequency(Oi) frequency(Ej) -Ej) -Ej)2 Ej
1 35 25 10 100 4
2 15 25 -10 100 4
Total 8
Calculated value: 8
Degree of freedom: (n-1) = (2 - 1) = 1
The chi – square value at 0.05% level of significance at degree 1 of freedom is 3.8411.
Hence calculated value is more than table value.
Ho rejected, Mode you join the company.
CHART: 12
percentage
45
40
40
35
30
25
20 20
20
15
10 10 percentage
10
5
0
Interpretation:
From the above table 20% of the respondents opined that the criteria have to
be consider is cost consciousness, 20% as loyalty to the organization, 40% as
communication skills 10% as urge to excel, 10% as ability to work under stress.
Promotion of 5 10%
employees
motivation 15 30%
Total 50 100%
CHART: 13
percentage
60
50
50
40
30
30
20
10 10 percentage
10
0
Interpretation:
From the above table 50% of the respondents opined that the performance
appraisal is evaluation of employees, 10% as promotion of employees, 10% as job
satisfaction of employees 30% as motivation.
14. Which method of performance appraisal is implemented in the
organization?
Merit 25 50%
Grading 15 30%
Other 10 20%
Total 50 100%
CHART: 14
percentage
60
50
50
40
percentage
30
30
20
20
10
0
merit grading other
Interpretation:
From the above table 50% of the respondents opined that the performance
appraisal system in the organization is merit, 30% as grading, and 20% as other.
Yes 40 80%
No 10 20%
Total 50 100%
CHART: 15
PERCENTAGE
90%
80%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
20%
10%
0%
Yes No
Interpretation:
From the above table 80% of the respondents are opined that they received
increment in salary after performance appraisal, 20% not received.
(Oi -Ej)2
_________
Observed Expected (Oi (Oi
S.No Frequency(Oi) frequency(Ej) -Ej) -Ej)2 Ej
1 40 25 15 225 9
2 10 25 -15 225 9
Total 18
Calculated value:18
Degree of freedom: (n-1) = (2 - 1) = 1
The chi – square value at 0.05% level of significance at degree 1 of freedom is 3.8411.
Hence calculated value is more then table value.
Ho rejected, Increment in salary after performance appraisal.
Yes 35 70%
No 15 30%
Total 50 100%
CHART: 16
percentage
80
70
70
60
50
percentage
40
30
30
20
10
0
yes no
Interpretation:
From the above table 70% of the respondents are opined that performance
appraisal help to provide an atmosphere where all are encouraged to share one other
burden, 30% opined as not help to provide an atmosphere.
Yes 40 80%
No 10 20%
Total 50 100%
CHART: 17
percentage
90
80
80
70
60
50 percentage
40
30
20
20
10
0
yes no
Interpretation:
From the above table 80% of the respondents are opined as the performance
appraisal helps people to set and achieve meaningful goals, 20% not opined.
Ho= Performance appraisal is not helps to set and achieve meaningful goals.
A sample of respondents of for type is give expected respondent for each respondent
=50/2=25
Computing statistic chi-square test:
(Oi -Ej)2
_________
Observed Expected (Oi (Oi
S.No Frequency(Oi) frequency(Ej) -Ej) -Ej)2 Ej
1 40 25 15 225 9
2 10 25 -15 225 9
Total 18
Calculated value:18
Degree of freedom: (n-1) = (2 - 1) = 1
The chi – square value at 0.05% level of significance at degree 1 of freedom is 3.8411.
Hence calculated value is more then table value.
Ho rejected, Performance appraisal helps to set and achieve meaningful
goals.
Yes 30 60%
No 20 40%
Total 50 100%
CHART: 18
SVCET, Dept of Management Studies, ChittoorPage 72
A study on Performance Appraisal
percentage
70
60
60
50
40
40 percentage
30
20
10
0
yes no
Interpretation:
From the above table 60% of the respondents are opined that the performance
appraisal give criteria in friendly and positive manner, 40% as not give criteria.
Yes 40 80%
No 10 20%
Total 50 100%
CHART: 19
percentage
90
80
80
70
60
50 percentage
40
30
20
20
10
0
yes no
Interpretation:
From the above table 80% 0f the respondents opined that the performance of
employees improved after process of performance appraisal, 20% as not improved.
(Oi -Ej)2
_________
Observed Expected (Oi (Oi
S.No Frequency(Oi) frequency(Ej) -Ej) -Ej)2 Ej
1 40 25 15 225 9
2 10 25 -15 225 9
Total 18
Calculated value:18
Degree of freedom: (n-1) = (2 - 1) = 1
The chi – square value at 0.05% level of significance at degree 1 of freedom is 3.8411.
Hence calculated value is more than table value.
Ho rejected, Performance of employees improves after process of performance
appraisal.
Yes 25 50%
No 25 50%
Total 50 100%
CHART: 20
percentage
60
50 50
50
40
percentage
30
20
10
0
yes no
Interpretation:
From the above table 50% of the respondents opined that the performance
appraisal improves motivation and job satisfaction, 50% responded that the
performance appraisal do not improve motivation and job satisfaction.
Yes 20 40%
No 30 60%
Total 50 100%
CHART: 21
percentage
70
60
60
50
40
40 percentage
30
20
10
0
yes no
Interpretation:
From the above table 40% of the respondents opined that the performance
appraisal helps to change behavior of employees, 60% opined as not helps to change
behavior of employees.
Yes 10 20%
No 40 80%
Total 50 100%
CHART: 22
PERCENTAGE
90
80
80
70
60
50 PERCENTAGE
40
30
20
20
10
0
Yes No
Interpretation:
From the above table 10% of the respondents are opined as the promotions are
strictly based on performance appraisal process, 40% opined as promotions are not
strictly based on performance appraisal process.
Always 20 40%
Often 20 40%
Rarely 10 10%
Never 0 10%
Total 50 100%
Chart- 23
PERCENTAGE
45%
40% 40%
40%
35%
30%
25% PERCENTAGE
20%
15%
10% 10%
10%
5%
0%
Always Often Ralrely Never
Interpretation:
From the above table 40% of the respondents are always and often as
the counseling after performance appraisal process, 10% opined as counseling are not
strictly based on performance appraisal process.
Yes 40 80%
No 10 20%
Total 50 100%
CHART: 24
PERCENTAGE
90%
80%
80%
70%
60%
50% PERCENTAGE
40%
30%
20%
20%
10%
0%
Yes No
Interpretation:
From the above table 40% of the respondents are opined as the team
performance based on performance appraisal process, 10% opined as team
performance are not based on performance appraisal process.
Agree 20 30%
Disagree 10 20%
Total 50 100%
Chart- 25
PERCENTAGE
45%
40%
40%
35%
30%
30%
25% PERCENTAGE
20%
20%
15%
10%
10%
5%
0%
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Interpretation:
From the above table 40% of the respondents are strongly agree and
30% of agree as the adequate feedback of performance appraisal process, 20% opined
as disagree and 10% of strongly disagree are not adequate feedback of performance
appraisal process.ss
FINDINGS
1) 50% of the employees aware of the performance appraisal system in the
organization.
2) 40% of the employees working with this organization for 10-15 years.
3) 70% of the employees aspects of the performance appraisal system is both the
qualitative and quantitative.
4) 60% of the employees expressed that the traditional method adopted by the
organization for evaluating the performance of the employees.
5) 70% of the employees expressed that the graphic rating method is been used
by the organization in traditional method.
6) 70% of the employees expressed that human resource accounting is been used
by the organization in modern method.
7) 50% of the employees prefer that appraisal system should be held half yearly.
8) 60% of the employees expressed that they are informed before they are
appraised.
9) 60% of the respondents feel that they are satisfied with their present job.
10) 40% of the employees feel that the objective of performance appraisal is for
rewards.
11) 60% of the employees feel that past performance should be considered.
12) 70% of the employees expressed salaries and rewards made them to join in the
company.
13) 40% of the employees feel that communication skill have to be considering in
order improving existing appraisal.
14) 50% of the respondents expressed performance appraisal is evaluation of
employees.
15) 50% of the employees expressed that merit method performance appraisal is
implemented in the organization.
16) 80% of the employees expressed that they receive increment in their salary
after performance appraisal.
17) 70% of the employees feel that performance appraisal help to provide an
atmosphere where all are encouraged to share one other burden.
18) 80% of the employees feels that performance appraisal help to set and achieve
meaningful goals.
19) 60% the respondents expressed that performance appraisal give criteria in
friendly and positive manner.
20) 80% of the employees expressed that their performance improve after process
of performance appraisal.
21) 50% of the employees feel that performance appraisal improve motivation and
job satisfaction.
22) 60% of the employees expressed that the top level is not partial in
performance appraisal.
23) 60% of the employees feel that performance appraisal helps to change
behavior of employees.
24) 50% of the employees expressed 360 degree appraisal process creates a
participative environment in the organization.
25) 80% of the respondents expressed that the promotions are not strictly based on
performance appraisal process.
26) 60% of the employees expressed that leadership and interpersonal skills
developed after 360 degree performance appraisal.
SUGGETIONS
The management must concentrate on training programs that create awareness
to the employees regarding performance appraisal.
The management should provide facilities and orientation to the employees
work in the organization for many years.
The management should also be including quantitative aspect of performance
appraisal.
The management should implement modern method for evaluating the
performance of the employees.
The organization should focus on the remaining methods in traditional
method.
The management must use any one method in the modern methods for
evaluate
Performance of the employees.
The management should evaluate the performance of employees quarterly
once in a year.
The management should take a step like not to inform the employees before
they are appraised.
The management must provide whole or part of performance appraisal
information to all the employees to make satisfaction of job.
The management must select best objective of performance appraisal system
for the employees in order to set targets, career planning.
The management must focus on the past performance of the employees while
they are going for performance appraisal it gives recognition of the employees
in the organization.
The management must provide the promotion to the employees for stimulate
people to join in the company.
The management must focus on the criteria like cost consciousness, ability to
work under stress in order to improve the existing appraisal.
The management appraisal employees as it help the individual to improve
their potential and helps to perform well.
The management must follow on prefer other method to evaluate the
performance of the employees.
The management should increase the salary of all the employees to make the
performance standard better in future.
The management should implement performance appraisal to provide an
atmosphere totally among all the employees to share the burden of one
individual of other.
The management must concentrate on performance appraisal as it helps to set
and achieve meaningful goals.
The performance appraisal conducted by the organization has to be give
criteria in friendly and positive manner for all the employees.
The appraised employees’ performance standard improves after process of
performance appraisal to achieve future objective of the organization.
CONCLUSION
From the above study I have concluded that performance appraisal
system play a vital role in the organization. Performance appraisal system will be
effectively only when the appraiser realizes that the appraisal is the basis through
which an organization functions effectively.
"A happy employee is a productive employee". Keeping this the appraisal
system is followed meticulously resulting in increasing organization performance.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Books:
Websites:
www.google.com
www.sruthimilkproducts.com
www.scribd.com
QUESTIONNAIRES
Name :
Age :
Gender :
Experience :
Material statues :
Qualification :
Deportment :
1. From how many years you are working with this organization? [ ]
(a) 0-5 years (b) 5-10 years (c) 10 to 15 years (d) more than 15 years.
2. Are you sure aware of all the details of the performance Appraisal system in your
organization? [ ]
(a) Fully aware (b) Partly aware (c) Not at all aware
3. The performance appraisal conducted in your organization evaluate in the aspects
of? [ ]
(a) Qualitative (b) Quantitative (c) Combination of (a)&(b)
4. Which approach has been adopted by the organization for evaluating the
performance of the employees? [ ]
(a) Traditional Method (b) Modern method (c) A combination of (a)&(b)
5. (a) What means/method is been used by the organization in Traditional method ? [ ]
(a) Graphic rating scale (b) Ranking Method (c) paired comparison
(d) ......................
5. (b) Model of Modern Method
6. How frequently do you like your performance should be appraisal? [ ]
(a) Quarterly (b) Half yearly
(c) Annually (d) Once in 2 years
7.Are you informed before you are appraised? [ ]
(a) yes (b) No
8. Are you satisfied with your present job in this Organization? [ ]
(a) To a great extent (b) To some extent (c) Not at all
9. Which of the following do you think are the objectives of your appraisal system?
[ ]
(a) For Rewards (b) For career Planning (c) To set targets (d) To review
performance
10. Do you feel the past performance should also be consider? [ ]
(a) yes (b) No
11. Which of the following made you to join the company? [ ]
(a) Salaries & Rewards (b) Promotions (c)...........................................
12. What other criteria do you think have to be taken into consideration in order to
improve the existing appraisal system? [ ]
(a) Cost consciousness (b) Loyalty to tech organization
(c) Communication skills (d) Urge to excel
13. In your opinion performance appraisal is? [ ]
(a) Evaluation of Employees (b) Promotion of Employees
SVCET, Dept of Management Studies, ChittoorPage 88
A study on Performance Appraisal
22. Does the promotions are strictly based on performance appraisal process? [ ]
(a) Yes (b) No
23. Does organization provide counselling after appraisal?
(a) Always (b) often. (C) Rarely. (d) Never
24. Evoluation of team performance should be included in performance appraisal
(a)yes. (b)no
25. Performance appraisal system provides adequate feedback.
(a) strongly agree. (b)agree
(C)disagree. (d) strongly disagree.