An Evaluation of Social Studies Textbooks in Turkey: A Content Analysis For Curriculum and Content Design
An Evaluation of Social Studies Textbooks in Turkey: A Content Analysis For Curriculum and Content Design
An Evaluation of Social Studies Textbooks in Turkey: A Content Analysis For Curriculum and Content Design
1Corresponding author: Assoc. Prof.; Faculty of Education; Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey; E-mail: ntomal [at]
omu.edu.tr; ORCID: 0000-0002-4365-6582
2Assist. Prof.; Faculty of Education; Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey; E-mail: bayram.yilar [at] omu.edu.tr; ORCID:
0000-0001-5889-3372.
© Review of International Geographical Education Online RIGEO 2019
ISSN: 2146-0353 www.rigeo.org
Review of International Geographical Education Online ©RIGEO, 9 (2), Summer 2019
For better comprehension of the subject, information on the period from the
introduction of social studies class into the Turkish elementary and secondary school
curricula and the social studies textbooks as a teaching material.
Theoratical Framework
Development of Social Studies Education in Turkey
Social studies have been taught as a compulsory course in Turkish elementary
schools since 1968, and also in secondary schools since 1975 despite some
interruptions time to time (Ambarlı, 2010, p. 20).
Developed based upon the relevant curriculum, the textbooks are the most
important materials of educational activities provided for students and teachers.
These materials help students reach the information and help teachers develop the
education process. As with the textbooks of other disciplines, social studies
textbooks have been considerably changed in time in parallel with the changes in the
curriculum. When reviewing the literature, it has been realized that a good number of
studies was carried out on social studies textbooks from past to present. There are
many studies that have been carried out especially on social studies textbooks
renewed depending on the curriculum change in 2005. It is seen that there are a
growing number of studies on the social studies textbooks used in Turkey since 2005
school year, and that the majority of the opinions on the textbooks from the said
period has become mostly positive. However, some of these studies highlight issues
with the social studies textbooks in terms of content. In this study, the positive and
negative aspects of textbooks written both before and after 2005 were evaluated in
terms of their contents.
Methodology
Research Design
A qualitative approach was adopted, and document analysis, which is a qualitative
data collecting technique, was used in this study. Document analysis is a method that
consists of some systematic steps intended for reviewing or evaluating of printed and
electronic documents (Bowen, 2009, p. 27).
The document sources of the study consist of 12 social studies textbooks used on
the 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th grade levels between 1968 and 2018. To be able to
accurately evaluate the content of social studies textbooks from 1968 to the present
day, the textbooks from different grade levels and with contents specifically based on
the curricula that were effective in different periods.
The social studies textbooks taught between 1968 and 2018 were used as the main
data source in content evaluation for the study. The textbooks subject to document
analysis in this study, are given in the Table 1:
448
Review of International Geographical Education Online ©RIGEO, 9 (2), Summer 2019
Table 1
Data on Textbooks Used as Data Resource in the Study
Writer name Year Textbook Publisher
name
Rakım Çalapala 1978a Social Studies İnkılap and Aka
(Elementary:4) Publishing
Houses
Rakım Çalapala 1978b Social Studies İnkılap and Aka
(Elementary:5) Publishing
Houses
Niyazi Akşit, Ferruh Sanır 1979 Social Studie National
and Tarık Asal for Secondary Education Press
Schools 2
Güler Şenünver, Ezdihar 1999 Elementary National
Karabulut, H. Samim School Social Education Press
Kesim, Rıfat Turgut, Studies 7
Nesibe Ercan, Mustafa
Küçükbaycan, Hasan
Huslu and Aliye Akiye
Güler Şenünver, Ezdihar 2001 Elementary National
Karabulut, H. Samim School Social Education Press
Kesim, Rıfat Turgut, Studies 7
Nesibe Ercan, Mustafa
Küçükbaycan, Hasan
Huslu and Aliye Akiye
Demet Karagöz, Meltem 2008 Elementary Ministry of
Tekerek, Niyazi Kaya, Social Studies National
Hikmet Azer, Melek Derya 5 Education
Alıç, Bekir Yılbat, Miyase Publications
Koyuncu, Kadir Ulusoy
Emine Genç, Mecit Mümin 2008 Elementary Ministry of
Polat, Samettin Başol, Social Studies National
Niyazi Kaya, Hikmet Azer, 6 Education
Sevil Gökçe, Miyase Publications
Koyuncu, Abdul Celil
Gök, Abdullah Yıldız,
Dilek Yılmaz, Âdem
Özcan
Murat Gürkan Gülcan, 2010 Elementary Koza Publishing
Özen Bayram, Zafer Kılıç, 5th Grade & Distribution
Fatih. M. Karakaya, Aliye Social Studies
Midilli Textbook
Ömer Faruk Evirgen, 2017 Social Studies Ministry of
449
Review of International Geographical Education Online ©RIGEO, 9 (2), Summer 2019
450
Review of International Geographical Education Online ©RIGEO, 9 (2), Summer 2019
blend together information from different fields in a learning domain. After all, as
agreed by some researchers, extensive design should be considered alongside
interdisciplinary design, and therefore, content from various areas should be integrated
in a textbook based on extensive design. Otherwise, the textbooks used prior to 2005,
which usually included information on each field under individual units except for those
regarding citizenship knowledge, or in other words, which were based on the sense of
single discipline where history, geography and citizenship knowledge textbooks are
combined into a singe textbook, can be considered extensive design textbooks only in
name. Rather than such content systematic, it may be more convenient to have separate
courses such as history and geography that constitute the social studies course. The
current social studies textbooks, on the other hand, seek to combine information from
different fields in a learning domain. In other words, existing social studies textbooks
can be considered in the context of extensive design both in name and practice, based on
interdisciplinary design.
The previous chapters of the study have mentioned how current and previous social
studies textbooks emphasize general teaching principles such as from near-to-far and
chronology. Based on these explanations, it can be said that linear content approach has
been utilized in social studies curriculum and textbooks. Also, with the increase in
detail, the repetition-oriented spiral approach has been utilized in content creation for
social studies textbooks from past to date.
Evaluation of Content in Terms of General Teaching Principles
Evaluation of content in terms of integrity principle. As stated in the
introduction part of the study, social studies was introduced as a course for the first time
in primary schools in 1968 and in secondary schools in 1975. When social studies was
introduced as a course in primary schools in 1968, the textbook had not been prepared
yet, and this continued until 1975. One of the supplementary textbooks used in the early
1970s until the textbooks were prepared was the social studies textbooks by Çalapala
(Alaca, 2017, p. 762). As can be seen in these examples on the content systematic of the
social studies textbooks from previous years, it is thought that it may prove confusing
for students if subjects that are continuations of one another are interrupted for other
subjects and resumed later. Therefore, based on these explanations, one can talk about
an issue of content complexity or a disorganized content systematic here. Despite this
unfavorable aspect, the primary concern behind the fact that history and
geographysubjects are featured together and taught alternately or a unit is entirely
comprised of geographysubjects and the next one is comprised of historysubjects in
social studies textbooks might have been to avoid boredom among students.
Each learning domain is internally coherent in terms of content; it does not have
significant direct relation with the preceding or following learning domains. That is to
say, the social studies textbooks that are currently being taught are largely comprised of
independent learning domains. As a matter of fact, these textbooks were prepared with
the intention of achieving internal coherence within each learning domain.
451
Review of International Geographical Education Online ©RIGEO, 9 (2), Summer 2019
452
Review of International Geographical Education Online ©RIGEO, 9 (2), Summer 2019
453
Review of International Geographical Education Online ©RIGEO, 9 (2), Summer 2019
454
Review of International Geographical Education Online ©RIGEO, 9 (2), Summer 2019
It can be maintained that the content design for both previous and current social
studies textbook is based on the spiral curriculum approach, since same units are
occasionally taught in different grades again (Doğanay, 2008; Yılar and Tomal, 2018;
Zarillo, 2016). Likewise, the fact that general teaching principles such as from-near-to-
far, chronology, and from-familiar-to-unfamiliar are taken into consideration in many
parts of these textbooks shows how linear approach design is also influential in the
content design. However, featuring the same geography subjects on current social
studies textbooks for different grades, or for the same grade in different learning
domains, without any substantial change in detail has led to redundant repetitions. This
issue actually arises from misapplication of the spiral approach.
Prior to 2005, social studies textbooks comprising largely of history, geography, and
to a lesser extent, citizenship subjects (MEB, 1997; 1998) were more prominent. But,
there has been a particular increase in the significance of citizenship field (MEB, 2005;
2018). To date, new headings have been added to the social studies textbooks, while
most of the existing headings also preserved their place in the current social studies
textbooks. For example, the history subjects featured in the curriculum of 1998 remain
largely the same as current history subjects. Nevertheless, less and less time has been
allocated for these subjects with the addition of new subjects in the textbooks. Since
geography subjects or the subjects related to geography extend to numerous learning
domains in the current textbook, the problem with time in the teaching of history
subjects is not encountered in the subjects of geography discipline. But, since the
subjects related to the science of geography extend to numerous learning domains, this
occasionally leads to redundant repetitions and interruptions in the coherence of the
subject. Particularly the fact that the geography subjects extend to the numerous
learning areas gives rise to a complexity in the content systematic.
It is safe to say that pre-2005 social study text books are very intensive in terms of
information. The textbooks prepared in accordance with the social studies curricula
preceding the curriculum of 1998 in particular are clearly far more intensive in terms of
information. In the textbooks published prior to this date, geography of countries is the
primary subject with the highest information density. Current social studies textbooks,
on the other hand, features far less information on various countries around the world
than it should. A few sentences and concise information on the geographical features of
these countries can be included in the textbooks.
A shift toward higher grades in the teaching of many subjects included in social
studies teaching from past to present is generally in line with the student-centeredness
principle. However, the matter of which subject will be taught in which grade and to
what extent while taking students' developmental characteristics into consideration is a
difficult and controversial issue. And such an issue requires more specialized and
extensive studies.
455
Review of International Geographical Education Online ©RIGEO, 9 (2), Summer 2019
References
Akşit, N., Sanır, F., & Asal, T. (1979). Ortaokullar için sosyal bilgiler 2. Ankara: Milli Eğitim.
Alaca, E. (2017). An evaluation of social studies course books. Education and Society in the 21st
Century, 6(18), 759-785.
Ambarlı, A. (2010). Elemantary education social studies curriculum in Turkey modifications,
corrections, updating (Unpublished master’s thesis). Selçuk University Institute of
Educational Sciences, Konya.
Barth, J. (1991). Elementary and junior high/middle school social studies curriculum. lanham,
Md.: University Press of America.
Baykara, K. (2012). İçeriğin ve eğitim durumlarının düzenlenmesi yaklaşımı. H. Şeker (Ed.),
Eğitimde program geliştirme içinde (s. 168-172), Ankara: Anı.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research
Journal, 9(2), 27-40.
Çalapala, R. (1978a). Sosyal bilgiler (ilkokul: 4). İstanbul: İnkılap ve Aka.
Çalapala, R. (1978b). Sosyal bilgiler (ilkokul: 5). İstanbul: İnkılap ve Aka.
Demirel, Ö. (2010). Eğitimde program geliştirme. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Doğanay, A. (2008). Çağdaş sosyal bilgiler anlayışı ışığında yeni sosyal bilgiler programının
değerlendirilmesi. Journal of Çukurova University Institute of Social Sciences, 17(2), 77-
96.
Evirgen, Ö. F., Özkan, J., Öztürk, S., & Özdural, Z. (2017). Sosyal bilgiler 5. Sınıf kitabı.
Ankara: MEB Yayınları.
Genç, E., Polat, M. M., & Başol, S. (2008). Sosyal bilgiler 6. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı.
Gülcan, M.G., Bayram, Ö., Kılıç, Z., Karakaya, F.M. & Midilli, A. (2010). Sosyal bilgiler 5.
Ankara: Koza Yayın.
Gültekin, G., Akpınar, M., Nohutçu, M., Özerdoğan, P., & Aygün, S. (2018). Sosyal bilgiler 7.
Sınıf kitabı. Ankara: Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı.
Güngördü, E. (2002). İlköğretimde hayat bilgisi ve sosyal bilgiler öğretimi. Ankara: Nobel.
Hsieh, H.F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.
Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687
Karagöz, D., Tekerek, M., Kaya, N., Azer, H., Alıç, M.D., Yılbat, B., Koyuncu, M. & Ulusoy,
K. (2008). Sosyal bilgiler 5. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı.
MEB. (1997). İlköğretim okulu programı. Ankara.
MEB. (1998). İlköğretim okulu sosyal bilgiler programı. Tebliğler Dergisi, 2487, 531-568.
MEB. (2005). İlköğretim sosyal bilgiler dersi 6-7 öğretim programı kılavuzu. Ankara.
MEB. (2018). Sosyal bilgiler dersi öğretim programı. (İlkokul ve ortaokul 4, 5, 6 ve 7. sınıflar).
Ankara.
Nas, R. (2000). Hayat bilgisi ve sosyal bilgiler öğretimi. Bursa: Ezgi.
Şahin, E. (2018). Sosyal bilgiler 5. Ankara: Anadolu.
456
Review of International Geographical Education Online ©RIGEO, 9 (2), Summer 2019
Semenderoğlu, A., & Gülersoy, A. E. (2005). Eski ve yeni 4-5. Sınıf sosyal bilgiler öğretim
programlarının değerlendirilmesi. Dokuz Eylül University Buca Faculty of Education
Journal, 18, 141-152.
Şenünver, G., Karabulut, E., Kesim, H., Turgut, R., Ercan, N., Küçükbaycan, M., Huslu, H., &
Akiye, A. (1999). Sosyal bilgiler 7. İstanbul: Milli Eğitim.
Şenünver, G., Karabulut, E., Kesim, H., Turgut, R., Ercan, N., Küçükbaycan, M., Huslu, H., &
Akiye, A. (2001). Sosyal bilgiler 6. İstanbul: Milli Eğitim.
Sunal, C.S., & Haas, M.E. (2005). Social studies for the elementary and middle grades a
constructivist approach. USA: Pearson Education.
Yılar, M.B., & Tomal, N. (2018). Sosyal bilgiler dersi ve yenilenen ders öğretim programı. A.
Uzunöz ve V. Aktepe (Ed.). Özel öğretim yöntemleri-cilt-2 içinde (s. 1-42). Ankara:
Pegem Akademi.
Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. (9. Baskı),
Ankara: Seçkin.
Yılmaz, F., Bayraktar, H., Özden, M., Akpınar, M., & Evin, Ö. (2018). Sosyal bilgiler 6.
Ankara: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı.
Zarillo, J.J. (2016). Sosyal bilgiler öğretimi-ilkeler ve uygulamalar. B. Tay ve S. B. Demir
(Çev.). Ankara: Anı.
Biographical Statements
Necati TOMAL is an Associate Professor at Ondokuz Mayıs University, Faculty of
Education Department of Social Studies Education. His main research interests include
curricula, textbooks, and teaching methods and styles.
Murat Bayram YILAR is a Assistant Professor at Ondokuz Mayıs University, Faculty
of Education, Department of Social Studies Education. His research interests include
social studies education and cooperative learning.
457