Scribd
Upload
23 views2 pages

1 130104070138 Phpapp02

The document discusses feedback and errors in language learning. It examines the difference between mistakes and errors, sources of errors, and stages of learner language development from random errors to a stabilization stage. The document also considers how to identify and describe errors and avoiding focusing too much on errors.

Uploaded by

Mussab Masri
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
23 views2 pages

1 130104070138 Phpapp02

The document discusses feedback and errors in language learning. It examines the difference between mistakes and errors, sources of errors, and stages of learner language development from random errors to a stabilization stage. The document also considers how to identify and describe errors and avoiding focusing too much on errors.

Uploaded by

Mussab Masri
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

1.

Errors and Mistakes

2. Statements about feedback The fact that the teacher gives feedback on student performance

implies a power hierarchy: the teacher above, the student below. Very much agree Totally disagree

Assessment is potentially humiliating to the assessed person. Very much agree Totally disagree

Teachers should give only positive feedback, in order to encourage, raise confidence and promote

feelings of success; negative feedback demoralises. Very much agree Totally disagree

3. Statements about feedback Giving plenty of praise and encouragement is important for the

fostering of good teacher-student relationships Very much agree Totally disagree Very frequent

approval and praise lose their encouraging effect; and lack of praise may then be interpreted as

negative feedback Very much agree Totally disagree Correcting each other can be harmful to

student relationships Very much agree Totally disagree

4. Mistakes and Errors Intralingual (within one language) errors Interlingual (across two or more

languages) errors ” A learner’s errors…are significant in (that) they provide to the researcher

evidence of how language is learned or acquired, what strategies or procedures the learner is

employing in the discovery of the language.” (Corder, 1967)

5. Mistakes and Errors A mistake refers to a performance error that is either a random guess or a

“slip,” in that it is a failure to utilise a known system correctly. An error , a noticeable deviation from

the adult grammar of a native speaker, reflects the competence of the learner. Mistakes are what

researchers have referred to as performance errors (the learner knows the system but fails to use it)

while the errors are a result of one’s systematic competence (the learner’s system is incorrect).

6. Mistakes and Errors Think about to what extent your learning or teaching has been characterised

by a progression of noticing and repair? Can you think of stages when you were in the process of

cleaning up your errors and may have made a few random mistakes? What do you do?

7. What’s the difference? An error cannot be self-corrected, according to James (1998), while

mistakes can be self-corrected if the deviation is pointed out to the speaker.

8. Error Analysis Learners from disparate language backgrounds tend to make similar errors in

learning one target language. Interlingual errors of interference from the native language Intralingual

errors within the target language The sociolinguistic context of communication Pyscholinguistic or

cognitive strategies Affective variables

9. Too much attention to error We must be aware of placing too much attention on errors and not

lose sight of the value of positive reinforcement or clearly expressed language that is a product of

the learner’s progress and development. The comprehension of language is as important as the

production . Language is speaking and listening, writing and reading. The absence of the error does

not necessarily reflect native-like competence because learners may be avoiding the very structures

that pose difficulty for them. We need to engage in performance analysis or inter-language analysis,

a less restrictive concept that places a healthy investigation or errors within the larger perspective of

the learner’s total language performance.

10. Sources of Error TABLE 9,1 PG 265 BROWN Interlingual Transfer Intralingual Transfer Context

of Learning Communication Strategies


11. Identifying and Describing Errors “ Does John can Sing?” A. no B. Yes D. Can John sing? E.

Original sentence contained pre-posed do auxiliary applicable to most verbs, but not to verbs with

modal auxiliaries OUT2

12. Identifying and Describing Errors “ I saw their department” YES NO (Context was a conversation

about living quarters in Mexico) NO F. YES. Spanish G. YO vi su departamento. YES H. I saw their

apartment E. Departamento was translated to false congate department. OUT2

13. But…what can I do more quickly? Generalised errors: addition, omission, substitution and/or

ordering Levels of language need to be considered: phonology, orthography, lexicon, grammar and

discourse Global errors hinder communication: ; they prevent the hearer from comprehending

some/all aspect of the message. Local errors do not prevent the message from being heard, usually

because there is only a minor violation on one segment of a sentence, allowing the hearer/reader to

make an accurate guess about the intended meaning.

14. Stages of learner language development Random Errors – pre-systematic stage Emergent

Stage Systematic Stage Postsystematic or stabilisation stage

15. References Brown, 273- 280 Errors in the Classroom Celce-Murcia and Hawkins, 1985,

Contrastive analysis, error analysis and interlanguage analysis. Beyond basics: Issues and

research in TESOL (44-66) Rowley, MA: Newbury House Gass (1989) James (1998) Errors in

language learning and use: Exploring error analysis. Harlow, UK: Addison Wesley Longman Corder

(1967), The significance of learners’ errors. International review of Applied Linguistics, 5, 161-170

Corder (1971) Idiosyncratic dialects and error analysis. International review of Applied Linguistics, 9,

147-159 Panova I and Lyster R(2002), Patterns of corrective feedback and uptake in an adult ESL

classroom, TESOL Quarterly, 36 – 573-595

You might also like