Space Exploration Image Gallery
Space Exploration Image Gallery
When the Space Shuttle Columbia lifted off on April 12, 1981, from Kennedy Space Center,
Fla., to begin the first space shuttle mission, the dream of a reusable spacecraft was realized.
Since then, NASA has launched more than 100 missions, but the price tag of space missions has
changed little. Whether it is the space shuttle or the non-reusable Russian spacecraft, the cost of a
launch is approximately $10,000 per pound ($22,000 per kg).
Up Next
A new space transportation system being developed could make travel to Geostationary Earth
Orbit (GEO) a daily event and transform the global economy.
A space elevator made of a carbon nanotubes composite ribbon anchored to an offshore sea
platform would stretch to a small counterweight approximately 62,000 miles (100,000 km) into
space. Mechanical lifters attached to the ribbon would then climb the ribbon, carrying cargo and
humans into space, at a price of only about $100 to $400 per pound ($220 to $880 per kg).
When the Space Shuttle Columbia lifted off on April 12, 1981, from Kennedy Space Center,
Fla., to begin the first space shuttle mission, the dream of a reusable spacecraft was realized.
Since then, NASA has launched more than 100 missions, but the price tag of space missions has
changed little. Whether it is the space shuttle or the non-reusable Russian spacecraft, the cost of a
launch is approximately $10,000 per pound ($22,000 per kg).
Up Next
A new space transportation system being developed could make travel to Geostationary Earth
Orbit (GEO) a daily event and transform the global economy.
A space elevator made of a carbon nanotubes composite ribbon anchored to an offshore sea
platform would stretch to a small counterweight approximately 62,000 miles (100,000 km) into
space. Mechanical lifters attached to the ribbon would then climb the ribbon, carrying cargo and
humans into space, at a price of only about $100 to $400 per pound ($220 to $880 per kg).
In this article, we'll take a look at how the idea of a space elevator is moving out of science
fiction and into reality.
Under the design proposed by LiftPort, the space elevator would be approximately 62,000 miles
(100,000 km) high. LiftPort is one of several companies developing plans for a space elevator or
components of it. Teams from across the world are set to compete for the $400,000 first prize in
the Space Elevator Games at the X Prize Cup in October 2006 in Las Cruces, New Mexico.
The centerpiece of the elevator will be the carbon nanotubes composite ribbon that is just a few
centimeters wide and nearly as thin as a piece of paper. Carbon nanotubes, discovered in 1991,
are what make scientists believe that the space elevator could be built. According to Dr. Bradley
Edwards of the Spaceward Foundation, "Previously the material challenges were too great. But
now we're getting close with the advances in creating carbon nanotubes and in building machines
that can spin out the great lengths of material needed to create a ribbon that will stretch up into
space" [ref].
The 62,000-mile (100,000-km) long space elevator would rise far above the average orbiting height of the
space shuttle (115-400 miles/185-643 km). In fact, it would equal nearly a fourth of the distance to the
moon, which orbits the Earth at 237,674 miles (382,500 km).
"They have very high elastic modulus and their tensile strength is really high, and that all points
to a material that, in theory, should make a space elevator relatively easy to build," said Tom
Nugent, research director, LiftPort Group.
Long carbon nanotubes -- several meters long or longer -- would be braided into a
structure resembling a rope. As of 2005, the longest nanotubes are still only a few
centimeters long.
Shorter nanotubes could be placed in a polymer matrix. Current polymers do not bind
well to carbon nanotubes, which results in the matrix being pulled away from the
nanotubes when placed under tension.
Once a long ribbon of nanotubes is created, it would be wound into a spool that would be
launched into orbit. When the spacecraft carrying the spool reaches a certain altitude, perhaps
Low Earth Orbit, it would begin unspooling, lowering the ribbon back to Earth. At the same
time, the spool would continue moving to a higher altitude. When the ribbon is lowered into
Earth's atmosphere, it would be caught and then lowered and anchored to a mobile platform in
the ocean.
The ribbon would serve as the tracks of a sort of railroad into space. Mechanical lifters would
then be used to climb the ribbon to space.
Anchor Station
The space elevator will originate from a mobile platform in the equatorial Pacific, which will
anchor the ribbon to Earth.
Counterweight
At the top of the ribbon, there will be a heavy counterweight. Early plans for the space elevator
involved capturing an asteroid and using it as a counterweight. However, more recent plans like
those of LiftPort and the Institute for Scientific Research (ISR) include the use of a man-made
counterweight. In fact, the counterweight might be assembled from equipment used to build the
ribbon including the spacecraft that is used to launch it.
Power Beam
The lifter will be powered by a free-electron laser system located on or near the anchor station.
The laser will beam 2.4 megawatts of energy to photovoltaic cells, perhaps made of Gallium
Arsenide (GaAs) attached to the lifter, which will then convert that energy to electricity to be
used by conventional, niobium-magnet DC electric motors, according to the ISR.
Once operational, lifters could be climbing the space elevator nearly every day. The lifters will
vary in size from five tons, at first, to 20 tons. The 20-ton lifter will be able to carry as much as
13 tons of payload and have 900 cubic meters of space. Lifters would carry cargo ranging from
satellites to solar-powered panels and eventually humans up the ribbon at a speed of about 118
miles per hour (190 km/hour).
"Our plans are to anchor the ribbon to a mobile platform in the ocean," said Tom Nugent, of
LiftPort. "You can actually move your anchor around to pull the ribbon out of the way of
satellites."
Repelling Attacks
The isolated location of the space elevator will be the biggest factor in lowering the risk of
terrorist attack. For instance, the first anchor will be located in the equatorial Pacific, 404 miles
(650 km) from any air or shipping lanes, according to LiftPort. Only a small portion of the space
elevator will be within reach of any attack, which is anything 9.3 miles (15 km) or below.
Further, the space elevator will be
a valuable global resource and
will likely be protected by the
U.S. and other foreign military
forces.
The idea of a space elevator shares many of the same elements as the transcontinental railroad. A
space elevator would create a permanent Earth-to-space connection that would never close.
While it wouldn't make the trip to space faster, it would make trips to space more frequent and
would open up space to a new era of development. Perhaps the biggest factor propelling the idea
of a space elevator is that it would significantly lower the cost of putting cargo into space.
Although slower than the chemically propelled space shuttle, the lifters reduce launch costs from
$10,000 to $20,000 per pound, to approximately $400 per pound.
Current estimates put the cost of building a space elevator at $6 billion with legal and regulatory
costs at $4 billion, according to Bradley Edwards, author of the "The Space Elevator, NIAC
Phase II Final Report." (Edwards is also the Dr. Bradley Carl Edwards, President and Founder of
Carbon Designs.) By comparison, the cost of the space shuttle program was predicted in 1971 to
be $5.2 billion, but ended up costing $19.5 billion. Additionally, each space shuttle flight costs
$500 million, which is more than 50 times more than original estimates.
LiftPort plans to market the platform, named HALE (High Altitude Long Endurance), as a station for
security cameras and cell phone and radio transmissions. [ref].
The space elevator could replace the space shuttle as the main space vehicle, and be used for
satellite deployment, defense, tourism and further exploration. To the latter point, a spacecraft
would climb the ribbon of the elevator and then would launch toward its main target once in
space. This type of launch would require less fuel than would normally be needed to break out of
Earth's atmosphere. Some designers also believe that space elevators could be built on other
planets, including Mars.
NASA funded Dr. Edwards' research for three years. In 2005, however, it only awarded $28
million dollars to companies researching the space elevator. Although it's still very interested in
the project, for now it would prefer to sit back and wait for more concrete developments.
For lots more information on space elevators and related topics, check out the links on the next
page.
Under the design proposed by LiftPort, the space elevator would be approximately 62,000 miles
(100,000 km) high. LiftPort is one of several companies developing plans for a space elevator or
components of it. Teams from across the world are set to compete for the $400,000 first prize in
the Space Elevator Games at the X Prize Cup in October 2006 in Las Cruces, New Mexico.
The centerpiece of the elevator will be the carbon nanotubes composite ribbon that is just a few
centimeters wide and nearly as thin as a piece of paper. Carbon nanotubes, discovered in 1991,
are what make scientists believe that the space elevator could be built. According to Dr. Bradley
Edwards of the Spaceward Foundation, "Previously the material challenges were too great. But
now we're getting close with the advances in creating carbon nanotubes and in building machines
that can spin out the great lengths of material needed to create a ribbon that will stretch up into
space" [ref].
The 62,000-mile (100,000-km) long space elevator would rise far above the average orbiting height of the
space shuttle (115-400 miles/185-643 km). In fact, it would equal nearly a fourth of the distance to the
moon, which orbits the Earth at 237,674 miles (382,500 km).
"They have very high elastic modulus and their tensile strength is really high, and that all points
to a material that, in theory, should make a space elevator relatively easy to build," said Tom
Nugent, research director, LiftPort Group.
Long carbon nanotubes -- several meters long or longer -- would be braided into a
structure resembling a rope. As of 2005, the longest nanotubes are still only a few
centimeters long.
Shorter nanotubes could be placed in a polymer matrix. Current polymers do not bind
well to carbon nanotubes, which results in the matrix being pulled away from the
nanotubes when placed under tension.
Once a long ribbon of nanotubes is created, it would be wound into a spool that would be
launched into orbit. When the spacecraft carrying the spool reaches a certain altitude, perhaps
Low Earth Orbit, it would begin unspooling, lowering the ribbon back to Earth. At the same
time, the spool would continue moving to a higher altitude. When the ribbon is lowered into
Earth's atmosphere, it would be caught and then lowered and anchored to a mobile platform in
the ocean.
The ribbon would serve as the tracks of a sort of railroad into space. Mechanical lifters would
then be used to climb the ribbon to space.
Anchor Station
The space elevator will originate from a mobile platform in the equatorial Pacific, which will
anchor the ribbon to Earth.
Counterweight
At the top of the ribbon, there will be a heavy counterweight. Early plans for the space elevator
involved capturing an asteroid and using it as a counterweight. However, more recent plans like
those of LiftPort and the Institute for Scientific Research (ISR) include the use of a man-made
counterweight. In fact, the counterweight might be assembled from equipment used to build the
ribbon including the spacecraft that is used to launch it.
Power Beam
The lifter will be powered by a free-electron laser system located on or near the anchor station.
The laser will beam 2.4 megawatts of energy to photovoltaic cells, perhaps made of Gallium
Arsenide (GaAs) attached to the lifter, which will then convert that energy to electricity to be
used by conventional, niobium-magnet DC electric motors, according to the ISR.
Once operational, lifters could be climbing the space elevator nearly every day. The lifters will
vary in size from five tons, at first, to 20 tons. The 20-ton lifter will be able to carry as much as
13 tons of payload and have 900 cubic meters of space. Lifters would carry cargo ranging from
satellites to solar-powered panels and eventually humans up the ribbon at a speed of about 118
miles per hour (190 km/hour).
"Our plans are to anchor the ribbon to a mobile platform in the ocean," said Tom Nugent, of
LiftPort. "You can actually move your anchor around to pull the ribbon out of the way of
satellites."
Repelling Attacks
The isolated location of the space elevator will be the biggest factor in lowering the risk of
terrorist attack. For instance, the first anchor will be located in the equatorial Pacific, 404 miles
(650 km) from any air or shipping lanes, according to LiftPort. Only a small portion of the space
elevator will be within reach of any attack, which is anything 9.3 miles (15 km) or below.
Further, the space elevator will be a valuable global resource and will likely be protected by the
U.S. and other foreign military forces.
The idea of a space elevator shares many of the same elements as the transcontinental railroad. A
space elevator would create a permanent Earth-to-space connection that would never close.
While it wouldn't make the trip to space faster, it would make trips to space more frequent and
would open up space to a new era of development. Perhaps the biggest factor propelling the idea
of a space elevator is that it would significantly lower the cost of putting cargo into space.
Although slower than the chemically propelled space shuttle, the lifters reduce launch costs from
$10,000 to $20,000 per pound, to approximately $400 per pound.
Current estimates put the cost of building a space elevator at $6 billion with legal and regulatory
costs at $4 billion, according to Bradley Edwards, author of the "The Space Elevator, NIAC
Phase II Final Report." (Edwards is also the Dr. Bradley Carl Edwards, President and Founder of
Carbon Designs.) By comparison, the cost of the space shuttle program was predicted in 1971 to
be $5.2 billion, but ended up costing $19.5 billion. Additionally, each space shuttle flight costs
$500 million, which is more than 50 times more than original estimates.
LiftPort plans to market the platform, named HALE (High Altitude Long Endurance), as a station for
security cameras and cell phone and radio transmissions. [ref].
The space elevator could replace the space shuttle as the main space vehicle, and be used for
satellite deployment, defense, tourism and further exploration. To the latter point, a spacecraft
would climb the ribbon of the elevator and then would launch toward its main target once in
space. This type of launch would require less fuel than would normally be needed to break out of
Earth's atmosphere. Some designers also believe that space elevators could be built on other
planets, including Mars.
NASA funded Dr. Edwards' research for three years. In 2005, however, it only awarded $28
million dollars to companies researching the space elevator. Although it's still very interested in
the project, for now it would prefer to sit back and wait for more concrete developments.