Semantics is the study of the relationship between linguistic forms and entities in the world, focusing on meaning as an abstract property separate from context. Pragmatics studies how meaning depends on context, exploring how listeners interpret utterances based on the situation to understand the speaker's intended meaning. There are three views on the relationship between semantics and pragmatics - semanticism, pragmaticism, and complementarism - with complementarism seen as best, asserting that any account of meaning must be faithful to observable facts and as simple as possible. In short, semantics looks at meaning separate from context while pragmatics examines how context influences meaning.
Semantics is the study of the relationship between linguistic forms and entities in the world, focusing on meaning as an abstract property separate from context. Pragmatics studies how meaning depends on context, exploring how listeners interpret utterances based on the situation to understand the speaker's intended meaning. There are three views on the relationship between semantics and pragmatics - semanticism, pragmaticism, and complementarism - with complementarism seen as best, asserting that any account of meaning must be faithful to observable facts and as simple as possible. In short, semantics looks at meaning separate from context while pragmatics examines how context influences meaning.
Semantics is the study of the relationship between linguistic forms and entities in the world, focusing on meaning as an abstract property separate from context. Pragmatics studies how meaning depends on context, exploring how listeners interpret utterances based on the situation to understand the speaker's intended meaning. There are three views on the relationship between semantics and pragmatics - semanticism, pragmaticism, and complementarism - with complementarism seen as best, asserting that any account of meaning must be faithful to observable facts and as simple as possible. In short, semantics looks at meaning separate from context while pragmatics examines how context influences meaning.
Semantics is the study of the relationship between linguistic forms and entities in the world, focusing on meaning as an abstract property separate from context. Pragmatics studies how meaning depends on context, exploring how listeners interpret utterances based on the situation to understand the speaker's intended meaning. There are three views on the relationship between semantics and pragmatics - semanticism, pragmaticism, and complementarism - with complementarism seen as best, asserting that any account of meaning must be faithful to observable facts and as simple as possible. In short, semantics looks at meaning separate from context while pragmatics examines how context influences meaning.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 2
Ilhamdi Hafiz Sofyan
1410731012
Pragmatics
The Difference between Semantics and Pragmatics
According to George Yule (1996), pragmatics can be defined as a study of meaning as
communicated by a speaker and interpreted by a listener in particular context. Pragmatics explores how the listeners make inferences about the matter being said in order to arrive at “an interpretation of the speaker’s intended meaning” (p. 3). Pragmatics can also be defined as the study of how utterances have meanings in situations. According to Geoffrey Leech, the nature of language can be understood by knowing how language is used in communication.
There is difference between semantics and pragmatics. While semantics mainly
covers the relationship between signifiers and what they stand for, Pragmatics studies how context could affect the meaning of what is being said. Thus, we can say that Pragmatics is the study of “how more gets communicated than is said” (Yule, 1996, p. 3). Semantics in the other hand is the study of the relationships between linguistic forms and entities in the world. According to Leech (1983), meaning in semantics is defined purely as a property of expressions that come in abstractions from particular situations, speakers, or hearers, while meaning in pragmatics is relative to a speaker (p. 6). Thus, from Leech’s explanation, we can say that semantics deals with meaning as a dyadic relation, while Pragmatics deals with triadic relation. Leech also noted three different views of the relationships between semantics and pragmatics. Those views are ‘Semanticism,’ ‘Pragmaticism’ and ‘Complementarism.’ Leech argues that the third viewpoint is the one that best to view the relationships between semantics and pragmatics. This viewpoint asserts that “any account of meaning in language must (a) be faithful to the facts as we observe them, and (b) must be as simple and generalizable as possible” (Leech, 1983, p. 7). Similarly, George Yule also asserts that the principle of pragmatic is “interpret order of mention as a reflection of order of occurrence” (Yule, 1996, p. 8). This principle is frequently used to make sense what we hear or read, but we can also ignore it if it doesn’t apply in some situations. In short, we can also simplify the principle in following fashion, that is the more two speakers have in common, the less language they’ll need to use to identify familiar things. In conclusion, we can say that there are several differences between semantics and pragmatics, but the main differences between both studies is, while semantics studies the relationships between linguistic forms and entities in the world, pragmatics in the other hand studies the relationships between linguistics forms and the users of those forms.
