The Consequences of Capitalism A Marxist Analysis of The Gift of The Magi

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

The Consequences of Capitalism: A Marxist Analysis of

“The Gift of the Magi”


Marxist philosophy believes that society views the world through a completely economic lens.
Marxism dictates that society is separated into two classes: the bourgeoisie and the proletariat.
The bourgeoisie utilizes ideology to suppress the proletariat mainly by manipulating their
perceptions of their free agency. One ideology that the upper class perpetuates onto the
working class is that of consumerism. Consumerism is the belief that the quality of the items one
acquires can improve one’s worth. As Marxists believe of all ideologies, consumerism is an
unconscious belief that is so deeply entrenched in society that it affects the decisions that every
human being makes. This creed creates the concept of commodity fetishism which describes
how “[p]eople in a capitalist society thus begin to treat commodities as if value inhered in the
objects themselves, rather than in the amount of real labor expended to produce the object”
om
(Modules on Marx: Fetishism). By reducing the human experience to the pursuit of economic
prosperity, the concept of commodification was created. Commodification goes the extra step of
c

reducing a person’s value to their monetary value. These three concepts together have the
r.

power to dismantle nature’s purest concepts such as love. O. Henry’s “The Gift of the Magi”
displays how consumerism, commodity fetishism, and commodification can distort natural
xe

virtues such as self-identity and love.


fi

Jim and Della, the protagonists of “The Gift of the Magi”, base the measure of themselves and
es

their love for each other on consumerist ideals. Primarily, the narrator sets the scene when he
observes, “Now, when [Mr. James Dillingham Young] was being paid only $20 a week, the
ad

name seemed too long and important...Mrs. James Dillingham Young put her arms warmly
about him and called him ‘Jim’” (Henry 2). The speaker describes in explicit detail the extent of
gr

the couple’s dilapidated living conditions, mentioning the faulty items that clutter the house
such as the faulty doorbell and miniscule mailbox. Consumerism believes that the high value of
the products one owns is equitable to their class status. The narrator supports this idea by
highlighting the inappropriateness of James’s name as compared to his social standing.
“James Dillingham Young” speaks of prestige and affluence, of a legacy of wealth passed
down from generation to generation. It is a name designated to him by chance and the narrator
asserts that he is not deserving of it. The reason is based solely off of James’s economic
status, rather than on his character. This sentiment is solidified further by the fact that James’s
own wife refers to him as Jim. By consumerist standards “Jim” is a much more fitting name for
the salaryman. Jim is a simple, plain name, the type of name deserving for a man of such a low
class. Moreover, Della allows this ideology to color her judgment when she ponders, “Only
$1.87 to buy a gift for Jim...Something nearly good enough. Something almost worth the honor

Need help with the assignment?


Our professionals are ready to assist with any writing!

GET HELP
of belonging to Jim” (2). The story takes great pains to establish the authentic, pure love that
exists between James and Della.

As strong as that devotion is, Della believes that she can only prove her love through monetary
means. She views “the honor” of Jim as the wealthiest object that can match his noble
character. This perspective alters the wholesome nature of love, warping it into a competition of
goods. Love existed before currency, yet Della exhibits how money has grown to confine the
ideals of love. Furthermore, the story cements its attitude on consumerism when the narrator
details, “[The gold watch chain’s] value was in its rich and pure material. Because it was so
plain and simple, you knew that it was very valuable. All good things are like this” (3). It is ironic
that the words “plain” and “simple”, usually utilized to describe the conditions of impoverished
citizens, are now used to appreciate an upscale object. This is how the bourgeoisie uses
ideology to control the working classes. Unconsciously, the upper class celebrates chasteness
and frugality in their commodities while outwardly punishing the lower classes for the same
traits. This philosophy leads the indigent to revere austere yet expensive items even though the
same value can be found in cheaper substitutes. The power of consumerism is undeniable as it
om
pushes to Della to drastics measures to obtain the watch chain.
c

Commodity fetishism pushes the young couple unimaginable lengths to validate their love.
r.

Initially, the narrator illustrates the lovers’ deep reverence of material goods when he
expounds, “The James Dillingham Youngs were very proud of two things which they owned.
xe

One thing was Jim’s gold watch...Jim knew that no king had anything so valuable” (2-3). The
fi

narrator mentions that the watch has passed down to each generation in the Dillingham Young
family. However, this is not what gives the watch value. Gold or not, every watch serves the
es

same function. The worth of the object comes from its perceived luxuriousness, as shown by its
likening to a possession of a king. But the perceived grandeur of the watch is not enough to
ad

satisfy the couple. Therein lies the danger of commodity fetishism. Because Jim and Della have
gr

staked their passion for each other on material items, the attainment of one glorious commodity
only begets the desire for more. Consequently, Della exemplifies the impact of commodity
fetishism when the speaker elucidates, “The other thing was Della’s hair...Della knew her hair
was more beautiful than any queen’s jewels and gifts” (2). Della’s hair is another natural
aspect of the world given to her without any consideration of her class status. And yet, her hair
is reduced to nothing more than a commodity for trade that she must sell. She laments this
herself exclaiming, “‘But what could I do—oh! What could I do with a dollar and eighty seven
cents?’” (4). Since she has tied her love for James to physical objects, Della believes she had
no other option but to sacrifice something as precious as her own hair. The thought does not
occur to her that strength of her affection is a admirable gift on its own. In her worldview, love
has a ceiling that one can only bypass through wealth.

Commodification has the ability to pervert the image lovers have of one another but can be

Need help with the assignment?


Our professionals are ready to assist with any writing!

GET HELP
reversed by a change in worldview. Initially, Della demonstrates her warped view of her
husband when she contemplates, “Quietness and value—Jim and the chain both had quietness
and value. She paid twenty-one dollars for it” (3). Della frames her perception of her lover in
such a manner that it appears as if James should be striving to match the chain’s perfection
instead of the other way around. This image of James is further highlighted by the added detail
of the gift’s cost. Since the connection between the object and Della’s beau has already been
made, it appears as if the story is claiming that James’s worth also amounts to a mere twenty
dollars. Instead of demonstrating the depths of Della’s love, her perspective only displays the
restrictive parameters of her passion. However, she begins to break through her deep seated
ideologies when she proclaims, “‘Maybe the hairs of my head could be counted,’ she said,
“but no one could ever count my love for you.’” (5). Though it was through Della’s own fault
that her affection became commodified, she comes to a realization about the true nature of love.
Love is limitless, unlike the economy; its value cannot be counted. The narrator affirms this
message when he declares, “Eight dollars a week or a million dollars a year—how different are
they? Someone may give you an answer, but it will be wrong” (5). The speaker draws attention
to the truth about money: it only has a material worth. Innate ideals such as love have a power
om
that ascends above humanity’s social constructs. It exists for everyone no matter whether
they’re rich or poor. As the story displays, the fact that they were willing to sacrifice their most
c

prized object for each other outweighs any object that they could’ve exchanged. By overcoming
r.

their ideologies, James’ and Della’s love grows purer and stronger.
xe

Consumerism, commodity fetishism, commodification pervert organic aspects of humanity, as


fi

shown in O. Henry’s “The Gift of the Magi.” The thoughts and actions of the young couple
featured in this tale display the deep rooted psychological effects of ideology. Left unchecked,
es

ideology can influence one’s outlook on the world. Jim and Della, an otherwise devoted couple,
commodified their love. Then their images of each other diminished to their level of material
ad

value. This entire process happened unconsciously, and they were only able to break free of the
gr

cycle through the strength of their love. The system as it remains now taints the natural bonds
that exist in society. The bourgeoisie strips away the ties that might inspire the proletariat to rise
against their oppressor by manipulating their psyche. The upper classes convince the working
classes that their life should be spent devoted to the pursuit of prosperity and that every
component of their lives work towards that end. Reinterpreting concepts such as love and
character as tools of the economy aids in the continuation of this system. Ultimately,
appreciation of the human spirit over one’s valuation is the first step in curtailing the class
disparity that has reigned over our society for generations.

Works Cited

Felluga, Dino. "Modules on Marx: On Fetishism." Introductory Guide to Critical Theory. January
31, 2011. Purdue U. March 11,2018 .

Need help with the assignment?


Our professionals are ready to assist with any writing!

GET HELP
Henry, O. The Gift of the Magi and Other Short Stories. Dover, 1992.

c om
r.
xe
fi
es
ad
gr

Need help with the assignment?


Our professionals are ready to assist with any writing!

GET HELP

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

You might also like