Tenecteplase in Ais
Tenecteplase in Ais
Objective: To compare efficacy and safety of alteplase versus tenecteplase in acute ischemic stroke
Background
AHA/American Stroke Society Guidelines for the Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke 2
IV alteplase is recommended for selected patients who can be treated within 4.5 hours of
ischemic stroke symptom onset or patient last known well or at baseline state.
Alteplase 3 Tenecteplase 4
FDA Approved Uses: FDA Approved Uses:
- Acute ischemic stroke - Acute myocardial infarction
- Acute myocardial infarction Dosing: 0.25 mg/kg IV bolus, maximum 25 mg
- Acute massive pulmonary embolism Metabolism: Primarily hepatic
Dosing: 0.9 mg/kg, maximum 90 mg; 10% Elimination half-life: Biphasic
given as IV bolus, 90% as drip over 60 min - Initiation: 20-24 minutes
Metabolism: Primarily hepatic - Terminal: 90-130 minutes
Elimination half-life: 5 minutes How supplied: tenecteplase 50 mg kit
How Supplied: alteplase 100 mg kit Cost: $6,028.20 for tenecteplase 50 mg kit
Cost: $8,163.21 for alteplase 100 mg kit Misc: Incompatible with D5
Baseline Characteristics
Endpoints
Efficacy Safety
Functional status at 3 months Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH)
-Excellent: mRS=0-1
-Good: mRS=0-2
Early neurological improvement Symptomatic ICH
Statistics
Each endpoint was defined using absolute risk difference
- Pooled using random effects models
2
Heterogeneity measured using the I statistic (≥50% considered significant)
Network meta-analysis was used to assess effect of tenecteplase dosing on studied outcomes
- Stratified into 3 groups: 0.1 mg/kg, 0.2-0.25 mg/kg, and 0.4-0.5 mg/kg
Results
N=8 studies included (6 RCTs, 2 Observational studies); N=2031 participants total
Efficacy Safety
Excellent functional outcome Rates of ICH
ARD=0.03, 95% CI [-0.01;0.08] ARD=-0.02, 95% CI [-0.06;0.01]
Good functional outcome
ARD=0.07, 95% CI [-0.02;0.16]
Symptomatic ICH
ARD=0.00, 95% CI [-0.01;0.02]
Early neurological improvement
ARD=0.10, 95% CI [0.02;0.17]
3-month mortality
Rates of recanalization ARD=0.00, 95% CI [-0.03;0.03]
ARD=0.11, 95% CI [0.01;0.20]
I 2 >50% for all efficacy analyses except excellent functional outcome I 2 <50% for all safety analyses
Conclusions
Author's Conclusion: Tenecteplase is a reasonable alternative to alteplase for thrombolysis in
patients with acute ischemic stroke.
Strengths Limitations
Relatively large meta-analysis High rates of heterogeneity in efficacy outcomes
Includes RCTs and observational studies Neurological improvement and recanalization
outcomes not consistent across studies
Most RCTs included were open-label
1. Oliveira M, Fidalgo M, Fontao L, et al. Tenecteplase for thrombolysis in stroke patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med. 2021;42:31-37.
doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2020.12.026.
2. Powers WJ, Rabenstein AA, Ackerson T, et al. Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early
Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2019;15(12):e344-
e418. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000211.
3. Alteplase. Package insert. Genentech Inc.; 2018.
4. Tenecteplase. Package insert. Genentech Inc.;2018..