Portable EMG Data Acquisition Module For Upper Limb Prosthesis Application
Portable EMG Data Acquisition Module For Upper Limb Prosthesis Application
fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/JSEN.2018.2809458, IEEE Sensors
Journal
Abstract— Electromyography (EMG) signals are gaining four channel EMG acquisition system was developed based on
popularity to develop the prosthetics. In the paper, an efficient instrumentation amplifier (INA326) and operational amplifiers
multi-channel EMG signal acquisition system has been proposed for initial signal smoothening. However each channel requires
for upper limb prosthetic application. Various arm exercises
have been performed to obtain EMG signals from 5 different arm an individual INA326 and operational amplifiers (AD8603)
muscles for the validation of developed hardware. The muscle’s for conditioning which makes the system cumbersome and
position has been selected by palpation method. Furthermore, the complex. The system based on instrumentation amplifiers
classification algorithms have been examined for seven different require multiplexer to combine the data from multiple
activities. Total 29 subjects have been chosen (25 intact and 4 channels into single channel for wireless transmission, which
Amputees) to acquire the EMG data by these activities. To makes system expensive. Active electrode based system also
classify the recorded EMG dataset, 9 TDM (time domain) and 7
FDM (frequency domain) features have been extracted. A proposed but each channel requires separate cable and
comparative analysis of different classifiers is presented for interfaces this make system expensive. The power
different muscle position of electrodes. The signal processing and consumption of this kind of acquisition system is also very
classification algorithms have been processed in MATLAB 2016a. high [11]. System based on ADS1294 IC has utilized up to
The accuracy of classification ranges for different classification four channels EMG signal acquisition in the paper [12]. Since
algorithms from 57.69 % to 99.92 % for all subjects. it has only 4 differential inputs, therefore it can acquire less
muscle activities at a time. A small EEG/EMG recorder was
Index Terms—Acquisition; Classification; LDA; k-NN;
Prosthetic; sEMG; SVM; QDA. developed in the paper [13]. It required separate ADC which
has only 12 bit resolution, and fixed sampling rate. A FPGA
I. INTRODUCTION based hybrid EMG signal acquisition system was also
proposed for effective EMG measurement and separation
Electromyography (EMG) signals are becoming one of the
processing. The main drawback of the system was delay time
vital biological parameters which have wide range of
[14, 15]. In this paper, a multichannel system is being
applications in biomedical engineering, prosthetic device
proposed for prosthetic device, which is wireless, cost
development, human machine interaction (HMI) and
effective and compact in design. The prototyping cost of this
rehabilitation devices [1]. The electromyogram (EMG) is a
system is approx. INR 5000 (78 USD) which includes; analog
bio-potential signal which is acquired by electrodes through a
front end, DSP processor, passive components, Electrodes or
muscle fiber skin to observe the muscle activity. It is also
leads, PCB designing and wireless module.
associated with neural signal, sent from spinal cord to muscles
The pattern recognition for EMG consists of two parts,
[2, 3].The voltage range of EMG signal is 50 uV to 100 mV
features (attributes) extraction and classification (machine
and the frequency is varied from 10 Hz to 500 Hz for surface
learning). In the feature extraction process, the dimensionality
Electromyography(sEMG) [4].The sEMG signal is acquired
of the sEMG dataset is reduced to form a feature vector. This
by applying noninvasive electrodes.
is helpful to retrieve the useful information and also useful to
Many people lost their limbs due to accidents; some
remove an unwanted data. The accuracy and classification
people don’t have their limbs by birth. These people cannot
time in pattern recognition depend upon these features [15].
perform their daily routine work such as holding or moving an
The features are extracted through the segmentation of sEMG
object, eating etc. One solution for these amputees is EMG
signal rather than extracting through individual sample in
based artificial limb or Prosthetic device [5-8]. EMG based
order to keep structural information.
prosthetic device uses EMG signal to control the action of
There are evident gaps between devices and control
artificial limb with the help of motor [9]. This device includes
approaches of prosthetic limb. The large data set is required
data acquisition module, machine learning algorithm for EMG
for effective pattern classification and if the number of classes
pattern recognition and mechanical structure for controlling.
increases then huge amount of training data is needed to
Although many signal processing software and high level
improve classification results. In this study, a visual feedback
EMG signal acquisition systems are available in the market
mechanism is used for the training of amputees to improve
they are expensive (e.g. NeXus-10, BIONOMADX). There are
cognitive abilities of brain. The perception of the missing limb
systems developed, based on instrumentation amplifiers
is still attached to the body, is called phantom limb. Almost
(INA2141 or INA128), are difficult in design and provide time
60% to 80% amputees feel this sensation of phantom limb.
delay in signal processing for multichannel acquisition [10]. A
1558-1748 (c) 2018 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/JSEN.2018.2809458, IEEE Sensors
Journal
Sometimes, this sensation is painful. Muscles activation channel can be analyzed. In the proposed system, the
signals usually present in the residual part of the arm for the important parts of acquisition module (differential amplifier,
amputated limb. Brain always looking for the signals from the filtering, and analog to digital converter) are in a single chip
amputated part, However visual feedback system is introduced (ADS1298). For the overvoltage and surge protection each
for reducing the many chronic neurological disorders related channel of the system has been featured with the protection
to the phantom limb pain [16-19]. This visual feedback system circuit, which is shown in Fig.2. In this protection circuit
can be utilized in improvement of pattern classification of the schottky diodes and a second order passive low pass filter
missing limb for prosthetic application [20-22]. have been used. Schottky diodes have high switching speed
Proposed device is validated for arm activity recognition, and the low pass filter has cut-off frequency is 1 KHz.
where 25 healthy subjects (15 Male and 10 Female) and 4
amputees have been considered for EMG data acquirement. In
the subsequent stage, machine learning strategies have been
used for recognition of different arm exercises. Five muscles
have been chosen for acquiring EMG data and 16 features
(time and frequency domain) have been calculated. Further,
EMG data have been classified for different arm activities
including all feature sets as well as an individual feature set of
each channel.
In the proposed work, a bio-potential acquisition module
and a java based GUI is developed to display the real time
data. The hardware module is wireless, portable, power
efficient and has eight channels. Section II presents the system
architecture for the proposed system. Section III emphasis on
proposed data acquisition model. Section IV describes Fig. 2. over voltage protection circuit
overlapping windowing technique Section V covers feature There are several benefits of such types of bio-potential
extraction process, while section VI explains the EMG pattern acquisition systems [18]:
classification. Results are discussed in Section VII and a) The system has extremely low power consumption in
conclusion is derived in Section VIII. order of 0.75mW/channel.
b) The selection of sampling frequency may be done as
II. SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE per necessity.
The acquisition module of EMG signal comprises of c) A safety feature is also provided for Lead off
different parts such as electrodes, differential Amplification, Detection.
antialiasing filter, conversion of analog signal into digital d) Programmable gain provides the flexibility to select
signal and display system. Electrodes or leads act as a channel appropriate gain.
between muscle tissue skin and inputs of amplifier [17]. e) System is smaller in size that can be used as a
The hardware module is based on ADS1298 IC (Texas wearable device in future.
Instruments) and ARM cortex M4 series processor, shown in For the wireless communication Bluetooth module has been
Fig. 1. used of 2.4 GHz frequency ISM Band. This module provides
optimal balance between power demand and transmission in
the short range communication and use Gaussian frequency
shift keying modulation. The operating temperature of this
module is -20o C to +74o C. Further, a java based GUI is
developed which shows real time data. The signals are
acquired at 4000 samples/sec on Intel core i3 computer with
2.54 GHz and 3.80 RAM.
1558-1748 (c) 2018 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/JSEN.2018.2809458, IEEE Sensors
Journal
Fig. 4. Performed Activities (i) Hand Open (ii) Hand Close (iii) Wrist Flexion
Total 25 healthy subjects (10 females and 15 males) and 4 (iv) Wrist Extension (v) Soft Gripping (vi) Medium Gripping (vii) Hard
Gripping
Amputees have been enlisted for acquisition Remaining arm
percentage is calculated as the ratio between the length of
amputated arm and the length of contralateral forearm from
Fig. 3. Amputee 1: Wrist disarticulation Fig. 5. Data acquisition setup for the amputees
the elbow. All the amputees are wrist disarticulated; Fig. 3 IV. EMG DATA SEGMENTATION
shows the picture of amputated hand of subject 1.
a) Subsequently, subjects were asked to sit at a desk on There is a need for data segmentation when data is
laboratory chair. Seven upper-limb activities processed for the feature extraction; in these segmentations
(exercises) have been performed five to six times for data is considered as quasi- stationary. Two main parts should
normal subjects and four time for amputees: i. Hand be considered properly in order to design appropriate data
open (HO), ii. Hand closed (HC), iii. Wrist extension segmentation strategy; namely the window length
(WE), iv. Wrist flexion (WF), v. Soft gripping (SG), (segmentation length) and the amount of overlapping between
vi. Medium gripping (MG), and vii. Hard gripping two consecutives segments. The segmentation window length
(HG), shown in Fig 4. has trade-off between classifier accuracy and classification
b) The training has been provided to overcome response time. As the segmentation length increases the
cognitive effort prior to acquisition. classification performance improves, on the other hand
c) A band pass filter of frequency range of 20 Hz to 500 classification length must be small enough to satisfy the hard
Hz and an amplification gain 12x have been applied. real time performance of the myoelectric control. Many
Sampling frequency is fixed at 4000 Hz. experiments have been carried out by researchers with
d) The EMG dataset of the right arm exercise has been different segment length. In the literature, a delay of 150~250
prepared through five muscle positions, using bipolar ms interval is considered for EMG activity segmentation [26].
Ag-AgCl (Silver – silver chloride) electrodes 2 mm In the presented work, window size has been taken of 250 ms
diameter spaced 12 to 36 mm apart. Muscles (1000 samples) with window shift of 25 ms, shown in Fig. 6.
1558-1748 (c) 2018 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/JSEN.2018.2809458, IEEE Sensors
Journal
1558-1748 (c) 2018 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/JSEN.2018.2809458, IEEE Sensors
Journal
Fig. 8. All 5 channels wave form representation for Wrist Extension (WE)
Fig. 7. All 5 channels wave form representation for Hand Open (HO) activity: A
activity: A (channel 1), B (channel 2), C (channel 3), D (channel 4), E
(channel 1), B (channel 2), C (channel 3), D (channel 4), E (channel 5
(channel 5)
Fig. 9. All 5 channels wave form representation for Hard Gripping (HG) activity: Fig. 10. Channel 5 (Biceps Brachii muscle) EMG signal for HO, WE and
A (channel 1), B (channel 2), C (channel 3), D (channel 4), E (channel 5) HG activities
1558-1748 (c) 2018 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/JSEN.2018.2809458, IEEE Sensors
Journal
Fig. 11. Classification accuracy Comparison for different classification algorithm Fig. 12. Classification accuracy Comparison for different classification algorithm
including all performed activities: All (All channels), ch 1 (channel 1), ch 2 including HO, HC, WE and WF activities: All (All channels), ch 1 (channel 1),
(channel 2), ch 3 (channel 3), ch 4 (channel 4), ch 5 (channel 5) ch 2 (channel 2), ch 3 (channel 3), ch 4 (channel 4), ch 5 (channel 5)
Fig. 13. Classification accuracy Comparison for different classification algorithm Fig. 14. Classification accuracy Comparison for different classification algorithm
including SG, MG and HG activities: All (All channels), ch 1 (channel 1), ch 2 including all activities for prosthetic: All (All channels), ch 1 (channel 1), ch 2
(channel 2), ch 3 (channel 3), ch 4 (channel 4), ch 5 (channel 5) (channel 2), ch 3 (channel 3), ch 4 (channel 4), ch 5 (channel 5)
The classification results through LDA and QDA are also training process [36-38]. LDA classifiers increase its
satisfactory. Further classification accuracy has been performance when the huge number of features is used [39].
calculated by each channel (16 features each channel). The LDA with 5 channels has shown better classification accuracy
channel 5 has better performance as compare to other when activities are quite different. For all Activities
channels, shown in Fig 11. The total arm activities have been classification, the accuracy ranges corresponds all channels
divided into two categories. Activities HO, HC, WF, WE are 99.54% maximum for random forest and minimum 75.38%
included in first category, rest of three gripping activities (SG, for LDA classifier. In case of individual channels, channel 2
MG, HG) are included in second category. Same procedure is and channel 5 shows better classification performance.
followed on these two categories separately as explained Channel 2 and channel 5 both shows maximum performance
above. The classification performance for both the category is in case of random forest classifier which is 92.07% and
shown in Fig. 12 and Fig. 13 respectively. The classification 91.56% respectively. However channel 5 has minimum of
accuracy is increased for each category. The contribution of 57.68% for LDA classifier.
channel 5 in classification accuracy is maximum for first A. Category 1 EMG pattern classification
category and contribution of channels 1 and 4 are maximum in In this category the classification accuracy has been improved
second category. The classification accuracy of first category for all the classification algorithms. Some of HO activities
is better than second category. The activities performed in first misclassified and predicted as HC activity and vice-versa. In
category are quite different from each other’s, but the case of all channels all the algorithms shows better
activities of second category resemble each other to some classification performance maximum (99.92%) achieved by
extent. By dividing the total activities into two categories, the random forest classifier and minimum (89.76%) by the LDA.
classification accuracy of discriminant analysis (LDA, QDA) classifiers. So for the myoelectric control these kinds of
is improved. These classification algorithms (LDA, QDA) are activity can be easily classified in the short time.
less complex, simpler to implement and require less time in B. Category 2 EMG pattern classification
1558-1748 (c) 2018 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/JSEN.2018.2809458, IEEE Sensors
Journal
In this category, different gripping activity has been training model prepared with visual feedback setup and tested
performed. Maximum classification accuracy is achieved by it with normal data, the classification accuracy significantly
Random forest (99.70%) and minimum by LDA (82.63%). improved by 87% with LDA and by 85% with Random forest
Although, less amplitude signal is generated on the channel 5 as shown in Fig. 14. In the both the cases, healthy subjects and
(Biceps Brachii muscle) in comparison of other channels, by the amputees the random forest classifier has performed
performing all activities but it has shown better classification satisfactory and consistent. Confusion matrix of the Random
results. forest classifier for both the cases healthy and amputees’
C. EMG pattern classification for amputees pattern classification have been shown in Table IV and Table
The classification performance is evaluated separately for V respectively. Even the feature matrix size is less but it
Amputee’s data, highest accuracy has been achieved by LDA consume more time than other classification algorithms.
classifier with all five muscles signals, and random forest
I. CONCLUSION
classifier has better performance. Channels 5 (Biceps Brachii
The paper presents a wireless and compact EMG data
Muscle) has performed better for different EMG patterns.
acquisition module for prosthesis application. This system has
Lowest classification patterns detected by the SVM classifier.
advantage of online visualization of signal during EMG
When training models are prepared with normal data then
activity and also passes the data in required format (.xls, .txt
classification accuracy has been achieved at most 78% with
and .csv etc.) for the offline processing.
random forest classifier and 73% by LDA. In the case of
TABLE IV TABLE V
CONFUSION MATRIX FOR HEALTHY SUBJECTS WITH RANDOM FOREST CLASSIFIER CONFUSION MATRIX FOR AMPUTEES WITH RANDOM FOREST CLASSIFIER
True HO HC WF WE SG MG HG True HO HC WF WE SG MG HG
Pred. Pred.
HO 1584 0 0 0 10 8 0 HO 86 4 0 0 10 8 0
HC 4 3378 0 0 4 0 2 HC 0 71 0 0 1 2 4
WF 0 0 2316 0 0 0 0 WF 0 0 73 0 0 1 0
WE 0 2 0 1352 0 4 0 WE 0 0 1 57 0 1 0
SG 8 0 0 0 1234 0 4 SG 2 0 0 0 47 18 2
MG 2 2 0 0 8 1538 10 MG 0 2 0 0 18 50 4
HG 12 2 0 0 10 10 1698 HG 1 3 2 0 3 4 60
The proposed system has capability to record several EMG for the feature matrix preparation. The k-NN and Random
based activities for analysis purpose. In this paper, five forest classifier have better performance in case of smaller
channels have been considered for EMG data acquisition. feature vector size. However, LDA has excellent performance
for larger feature vector size. The results show that the
TABLE VI
proposed system has potential to recognize the real time
COMPARISON OF COST WITH OTHER AVAILABLE DEVICES
activity for the upper limb arm. Cost comparison has been
CHANNE PRICE IN COMMERCIAL shown in the Table VI.
S.NO. PRODUCT
LS MARKET
PHYSIOLAB [40] $90 REFERENCES
1. 1
($90X8) FOR 8 CHANNELS
MYOWARE MUSCLE [1] Reaz, M. BI, M. S. Hussain, and Faisal Mohd-Yasin. "Techniques of
$37.95 EMG signal analysis: detection, processing, classification and
2. SENSOR [41] 1
($37.95X8) FOR 8 CHANNELS applications." Biological procedures online 8.1 (2006): 11-35.
NEXUS-10-MKII [42] [2] Merletti, Roberto, and Loredana R. Lo Conte. "Surface EMG signal
3 (INCLUDE SOFTWARE 4 $2900 processing during isometric contractions." Journal of Electromyography
COST) and Kinesiology 7.4 (1997): 241-250.
[3] Stashuk, Dan. "EMG signal decomposition: how can it be accomplished
4. PROPOSED DEVICE 8 PROTOTYPING COST ( $78)
and used?." Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology 11.3 (2001):
151-173.
In the classification process, the accuracy has been calculated [4] Farina, Dario, and Roberto Merletti. "A novel approach for precise
for all five channels as well as each available channel. During simulation of the EMG signal detected by surface electrodes." IEEE
Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 48.6 (2001): 637-646.
feature extraction process, total 16 features have been selected [5] Doerschuk, Peter C., Donald E. Gustafon, and Alan S. Willsky. "Upper
extremity limb function discrimination using EMG signal analysis."
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 1 (1983): 18-29.
1558-1748 (c) 2018 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/JSEN.2018.2809458, IEEE Sensors
Journal
[6] Erik Scheme MSc, PEng, and PEng Kevin Englehart PhD. in Proc. of the ACM Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems,
"Electromyogram pattern recognition for control of powered upper-limb ser. CHI ’15, 2015, pp. 3653–3656.
prostheses: State of the art and challenges for clinical use." Journal of [28] S. Benatti, F. Casamassima, B. Milosevic, E. Farella, P. Schonle, S.
rehabilitation research and development 48.6 (2011): 643. Fateh, T. Burger, Q. Huang, and L. Benini, “A versatile embedded
[7] Avizzano, Carlo Alberto, Emanuele Ruffaldi, and Massimo Bergamasco. platform for emg acquisition and gesture recognition,” Biomedical
"A novel wearable biometric capture system." Control and Automation Circuits and Systems, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 620–630,
(MED), 2014 22nd Mediterranean Conference of. IEEE, 2014. 2015.
[8] Liu, Jing Z., et al. "Accessory hardware for neuromuscular [29] De Luca, Carlo J., et al. "Filtering the surface EMG signal: Movement
measurements during functional MRI experiments." Magnetic artifact and baseline noise contamination." Journal of biomechanics 43.8
Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine 13.3 (2002): (2010): 1573-1579.
164-171. [30] Hsueh, Ya-Hsin, Chieh Yin, and Yan-Hong Chen. "Hardware System
[9] C. Castellini and P. van der Smagt, “Surface emg in advanced hand for Real-Time EMG Signal Acquisition and Separation Processing
prosthetics,” Biological cybernetics, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 35–47, 2009. during Electrical Stimulation." Journal of medical systems 39.9 (2015):
[10] A.Pradhan et al., "Acquisition and classification of EMG using a dual- 88.
channel EMG biopotential amplifier for controlling assistive [31] Gokgoz, E., and Subasi, A., Effect of multiscale PCA de-noising on
devices," 2016 IEEE Annual India Conference (INDICON), Bangalore, EMG signal classification for diagnosis of neuromuscular disorders. J.
2016, pp. 1-5 Med. Syst. 38(4):1–10, 2014.
[11] Guo, Weichao, et al. "Development of a multi-channel compact-size [32] Winslow, J., Jacobs, P.L., Tepavac, D., Fatigue compensation during
wireless hybrid SEMG/NIRS sensor system for prosthetic FES using surface EMG. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 13:555–568, 2003.
manipulation." IEEE Sensors Journal 16.2 (2016): 447-456. [33] . Keller, T., Curt, A., Popovic, M.R., Signer, A., Dietz, V., Graspingin
[12] de Oliveira, Igor Harres, and Alexandre Balbinot. "Portable high lesioned tetraplegic subjects using the EMG controlled
electrocardiograph based on the integrated circuit ADS1294 using an neuroprosthesis. Neurorehabilitation 10:251–255, 1998.
android application as interface." Health and Technology 5.2 (2015): [34] Langzama, E., Isakovb, E., Mizrahi, J., Evaluation of methods for
147-154. extraction of the volitional EMG in dynamic hybrid muscle activation. J.
[13] Di Pascoli, Stefano, et al. "Design and implementation of a wireless in- Neuroeng. Rehabil. 3:27, 2006
ovo EEG/EMG recorder." IEEE transactions on biomedical circuits and [35] Langzama, E., Nemirovskyc, Y., Isakovb, E., Mizrahi, J., Muscle
systems 7.6 (2013): 832-840 enhancement using closed-loop electrical stimulation: volitional versus
[14] Hsueh, Ya-Hsin, Chieh Yin, and Yan-Hong Chen. "Hardware System induced torque. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 17:275–284, 2007.
for Real-Time EMG Signal Acquisition and Separation Processing [36] K. Englehart and B. Hudgins, "A robust, real-time control scheme for
during Electrical Stimulation." Journal of medical systems 39.9 (2015): multifunction myoelectric control," in IEEE Transactions on Biomedical
88. Engineering, vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 848-854, July 2003. doi:
[15] H. Huang et al., “An analysis of emg electrode configuration for targeted 10.1109/TBME.2003.813539.
muscle reinnervation based neural machine interface,” Neural Systems [37] Zardoshti-Kermani, Mahyar, et al. "EMG feature evaluation for
and Rehabilitation Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 16, no. 1, movement control of upper extremity prostheses." IEEE Transactions on
pp. 37–45, 2008 Rehabilitation Engineering 3.4 (1995): 324-333.
[16] Hsu, Chih-Wei, and Chih-Jen Lin. "A comparison of methods for [38] Kim, Kang Soo, et al. "Comparison of k-nearest neighbor, quadratic
multiclass support vector machines." IEEE transactions on Neural discriminant and linear discriminant analysis in classification of
Networks 13.2 (2002): 415-425. electromyogram signals based on the wrist-motion directions." Current
[17] Khoddami, Seyyedeh Maryam, Noureddin Nakhostin Ansari, and Applied Physics 11.3 (2011): 740-745.
Shohreh Jalaie. "Review on laryngeal palpation methods in muscle [39] Ramachandran, Vilayanur S., and Eric L. Altschuler. "The use of visual
tension dysphonia: validity and reliability issues." Journal of Voice 29.4 feedback, in particular mirror visual feedback, in restoring brain
(2015): 459-468. function." Brain 132.7 (2009): 1693-1710.
[18] Instruments, Texas. "ADS129x low-power, 8-Channel, 24-Bit analog [40] https://www.amazon.com/PhysioLab-Biosignal-Module-Mini-size-
front-end for biopotential measurements." datasheet) SBAS459K isolation/dp/B013OUBLI2?th=1
January (2010). [41] https://www.sparkfun.com/products/13723
[19] Cipriani, Christian, et al. "Online myoelectric control of a dexterous [42] https://www.mindmedia.com/products/nexus-10-mkii
hand prosthesis by transradial amputees." IEEE Transactions on Neural
Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 19.3 (2011): 260-270 Sidharth Pancholi has completed M -Tech
[20] Junior, Jose Jair Alves Mendes, et al. "Robotic Arm Activation using from Thapar University, Patiala, India in
Surface Electromyography with LABVIEW." IEEE Latin America May 2016. Currently, he is pursuing Ph -D
Transactions 14.8 (2016): 3597-3605. from Malaviya National Institute of
[21] L. H. Smith, L. J. Hargrove, B. A. Lock and T. A. Kuiken, "Determining Technology, Jaipur, India. He is working in
the Optimal Window Length for Pattern Recognition-Based Myoelectric biomedical engineering domain. He has two
Control: Balancing the Competing Effects of Classification Error and years of industry experience. His current
Controller Delay," in IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and research interests include biomedical signal
Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 19, no.2, pp.186-192, April2011. doi: processing, Prosthetic device development and embedded systems.
10.1109/TNSRE.2010.2100828
[22] A. Pantelopoulos and N. G. Bourbakis, “A survey on wearable sensor- Amit M Joshi has Completed his Ph.D from
based systems for health monitoring and prognosis,” IEEE Trans. on National Institute of Technology, Surat,
Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2010. India in August,2015. Currently, He is
[23] Phinyomark, Angkoon, Pornchai Phukpattaranont, and Chusak working as Assistant Professor in
Limsakul. "Feature reduction and selection for EMG signal Electronics & Communication dept. at
classification." Expert Systems with Applications 39.8 (2012): 7420- National Institute of Technology, Jaipur
7431.. since July 2013. He has eight years of
[24] Houjie, Wei, Guan Jin'an, and Fang Hao. "Portable Biopotential Signal teaching experience and two years of
Acquisition System of ADS1298 Anolog Front-end [J]." industry experience. His current research interests include biomedical
Microcontrollers & Embedded Systems 2 (2012): 012. signal processing, VLSI DSP Systems and Embedded system design.
[25] M. A. Oskoei and H. Hu, “Myoelectric control systems: A survey,”
Biomedical Signal Proc. and Control, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 275–294, 2007.
[26] D. Farina et al., “The extraction of neural information from the surface
emg for the control of upper-limb prostheses: Emerging avenues and
challenges,” Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, IEEE
Transactions on, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 797– 809, 2014.
[27] F. Haque, M. Nancel, and D. Vogel, “Myopoint: Pointing and clicking
using forearm mounted electromyography and inertial motion sensors,”
1558-1748 (c) 2018 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.