Typical Speech Sound Development: Keywords: Speech, Articulation, Phonology, Speech Sounds
Typical Speech Sound Development: Keywords: Speech, Articulation, Phonology, Speech Sounds
Typical Speech Sound Development: Keywords: Speech, Articulation, Phonology, Speech Sounds
Developing the ability to communicate using clear speech sounds is an important part of early
childhood development. Speech sound acquisition is a gradual process that is different for every
child, and there is a wide range of ‘normal’ speech development. However, knowing what typical
speech sound development looks like can be helpful in deciding whether a child’s speech needs
further investigation.
Keywords: speech, articulation, phonology, speech sounds
Intelligibility
The term intelligibility refers to the proportion of a child’s spoken output that a listener can readily
understand (please note it is not a comment on a child’s intelligence). The following provides a guide
for how well typically-developing children of different ages can be understood by their parents:
By 18 months 25% intelligible
Around a quarter of the child’s speech is able to be understood
By 24 months 50 - 75% intelligible
At least half of the child’s speech is able to be understood.
By 36 months 75 – 100% intelligible
Most or all of the child’s speech is able to be understood.
(Lynch, Brookshire & Fox, 1980)
Children are likely to be less intelligible to strangers, but as a general rule, children are expected to be
at least 50% intelligible to unfamiliar listeners by three years of age, and almost 100% intelligible to
unfamiliar listeners by 4 years of age (Flipsen, 2006).
Phonetic Development
Phonetic development refers to a child’s ability to produce a speech sound correctly, either
spontaneously or in imitation. The table below lists the ages at which most children will have acquired
various speech sounds:
salda.org.au PAGE 1
4- 4 ½ Years • Affricates: tʃ (‘ch’ as in ‘chair’), dȜ (‘j’ as in ‘jump’)
• Fricative: Ȝ (as in ‘measure’)
6- 6 ½ Years • Approximate: r
Phonological Development
Even if children are able to produce a sound, they may not consistently use the sound correctly. For
example, a child may be able to say a “g” sound in isolation, but say “doat” instead of “goat” in
conversation. Using the right sounds in the right places refers to a child’s phonological development.
The table below lists some common “errors” or phonological processes, and the age at which each
process is expected to have disappeared from a child’s speech. Please note that this is not an
exhaustive list.
Approximate Age of
Phonological Process Example
Elimination
Prevocalic Voicing car → gar
A voiceless (quiet) sound is replaced by a toe → doe 3 years
voiced (loud) sound. pig → big
Word Final Devoicing bed → bet
A final voiced sound is replaced by a big → bik 3 years
voiceless sound.
Final Consonant Deletion boat → bo
3 ¼ years
The final sound is omitted from a word cat → ca
Velar Fronting car → tar
A sound produced towards the back of the sick → sit
mouth is replaced by a sound produced 3 ½ years
goat → doat
towards the front of the mouth.
sing → sin
Palatal Fronting sheep → seep
A fricative sound is brought forward in the measure → mezza 3 ½ years
mouth.
Assimilation maybe → mayme
One sound influences another sound cup → pup 3 ¾ years
within a word.
salda.org.au PAGE 2
Weak Syllable Deletion elephant → e-phant
Unstressed syllables are omitted in words umbrella → brella 4 years
of more than one syllable.
Cluster Reduction float → foat
One or more sounds in a group of umbrella → umbella 4 years
consonant sounds is omitted. string → sing
Gliding of Liquids little → wittle
Liquid sounds ‘r’ and ‘l’ are replaced by red → wed 5 years
glides ‘w’ and ‘y’. light → yight
Stopping fin → pin 3 years (f, s)
A long sound is replaced by a short, van → ban 3 ½ years (v, z)
plosive sound. sheep → teep 4 ½ years (sh, j, ch)
thing → ting 5 years (th)
(Bowen, 2011)
Megan to check
salda.org.au PAGE 3
References
Bowen, C. (2011). Table1: Intelligibility. Retrieved from http://www.speech-language-therapy.com/.
Bowen, C. (2011). Table 2: Phonological Processes. Retrieved from http://www.speech-language-
therapy.com/.
Bowen, C. (2011). Table 3: Elimination of Phonological Processes. Retrieved from http://www.speech-
language-therapy.com/.
Dodd, B., Holm, A., Hua, Z., and Crosbie, S. (2003). Phonological development: a normative study of
British English-speaking children. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 17(8), 617-643.
Dodd, B., Hua, Z., Crosbie, S., Holm, A., and Ozanne, A. (2002). Manual of diagnostic evaluation of
articulation and phonology. London: Pearson Education Inc.
Flipsen, P., Jr. (2006). Measuring the intelligibility of conversational speech in children. Clinical
Linguistics & Phonetics, 20(4), 202-312.
McIntosh, B., and Dodd, B. (2008). Two-year-old’s phonological acquisition: normative data.
International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10(6), 460-469.
Version 1.01
salda.org.au PAGE 4