Unit 2: Content and Contextual Analysis of Selected Primary Sources in The Philippine History
Unit 2: Content and Contextual Analysis of Selected Primary Sources in The Philippine History
Unit 2: Content and Contextual Analysis of Selected Primary Sources in The Philippine History
0 10-July-2020
At the rigid analysis and comprehension of this module, learners are expected to:
a) To familiarize oneself with the primary documents in different historical periods of the
Philippines.
b) To learn history through primary sources.
c) To properly interpret primary sources through looking at the content and context of the document.
d) To understand the context behind each selected document.
LEARNING CONTENTS
The first move towards independence began on July 7, 1892 when the Katipunan was established by
Andres Bonifacio. The Kataastaasan, Kagalanggalangang Katipunan ng mga Anak ng Bayan (KKK) or
Katipunan isarguably the most important organization formed in Philippine history. While anti-colonial
movements, efforts and organizations have already been done centuries prior to the foundation of the
Katipunan, it was only this organization that envisioned (1) a united Filipino nation that will revolt against the
Spaniards for (2) the total independence of the country from Spain. Previous armed revolts had already
occurred before the foundation of the Katipunan. but none of them envisioned a unified Filipino nation
revolting against the colonizers. For example. Diego Silang was known as an llocano who took up his arms
and led one of the longest running revolts in the country. Silang, however, was mainly concerned about his
locality and referred to himself as El Rey de Ilocos (The King of Ilocos). The imagination of the nation was
largely absent in the aspiration of the local revolts before Katipunan. On the other hand, the propaganda
movements led by the ilustrados like Marcelo H. del Pilar, Graciano Lopez Jaena. and Jose Rizal did not
envision a total separation of the Philippines from Spain, but only demanded equal rights, representation, and
protection from the abuses of the friars.
In the conduct of their struggle, Katipunan created a complex structure and a defined value system
that will guide the organization as a collection aspiring for a single goal. One of the most important Katipunan
documents was the Kartilya ng Katipunan. The original title of the document
Manga [sic] Aral Nang [sic] Katipunan ng mga A.N.B. or “Lessons of the Organization of the Sons of Country.”
The document was written by Emilio Jacinto in the year 1896. Jacinto was only 18 years old when he joined
the movement. He was a law student in the University of Santo Tomas. Despite his youth, Bonifacio
recognized the value and intellect of Jacinto that upon seeing Jacinto's Kartilya was much better than the
Decalogue he wrote, he willingly favored that the Kartilya be distributed to their fellow Katipuneros, Jacinta
became the secretary of the organization and took charge of the short-lived printing press of the Katipunan.
On 15 April 1897. Bonifacio appointed Jacinto as a commander of the Katipunan in Northern Luzon. Jacinto
was 22 years old. Jacinto died of Malaria at young age of 24 in town of Magdalena, Laguna.
The Kartilya can be treated as the Katipunan's code of conduct. It contained fourteen rules that
instruct the way a Katipunero should behave and which specific values should he uphold. Generally, the rules
that are contained in the Kartilya can be classified into two. The first group contains the rules that will make
the member an upright individual and the second group contains the rules that Will guide the way he treats his
fellow men.
Below is the translated version of the rules in Kartilya:
I. The life that is not consecrated to a lofty and reasonable purpose is a tree without a shade, if not a
poisonous weed.
II. To do good for personal gain and not for its own sake is not virtue.
III. It is rational to be charitable and love one's fellow creature, and to adjust one’s conduct, acts and words to
what is in itself reasonable.
IV. Whether our skin be black or white, we are all born equal: superiority in knowledge, wealth and beauty are
to be understood, but not superiority by nature.
V. The honorable man prefers honor to personal gain: the scoundrel, gain to honor.
VI. To the honorable man, his word is sacred.
VII. Do not waste thy time: wealth can be recovered but not time lost.
VIII. Defend the oppressed and fight the oppressor before the law or in the field.
IX. The prudent man is sparing in words and faithful in keeping secrets.
X. On the thorny path of life, man is the guide of woman and the children and if the guide leads to the
precipice, those whom he guides will also go there.
XI. Thou must not look upon woman as a mere plaything, but as a faithful companion who will share with thee
the penalties of life; her (physical) weakness will increase thy interest in her and she will remind thee of the
mother who bore thee and reared thee.
XII. What thou dost not desire done unto thy wife, children, brothers and sisters, that do not unto the wife.
Children, brothers and sisters of thy neighbor.
XIII. Man is not worth more because he is a king, because his nose is aquiline, and his color white, not
because he is a priest, a servant of God, nor because of the high prerogative that he enjoys upon earth, but
he is worth most who is a man of proven and real value, who does good, keeps his words, is worthy and
honest; he who does not oppress nor consent to being oppressed, he who loves and cherishes his fatherland,
though he be born in the wilderness and know no tongue but his own.
XIV. When these rules of conduct shall be known to all, the longed-for sun of Liberty shall rise brilliant over
this most unhappy portion of the globe and its rays shall diffuse everlasting joy among the confederated
brethren of the same rays, the lives of those who have gone before, the fatigues and the well-paid
sufferings will remain. If he who desires to enter has informed himself of all this and believes he will be able to
perform what will be his duties. He may out the application for admission.
As the primary governing document. which determines the rules of conduct in the Katipunan, properly
understanding the Kartilya will thus help in understanding the values, ideals, aspirations and even the
ideology of the organization.
Aside from the maltreatment experienced by Filipinos from the Spaniards, the following are other
factors that were influential in the forming of the Katipunan and that of the Kartilya:
1. The Age of Enlightenment gave way to Liberalism and Classicism and in the 20 th century, Modernism.
In this period, secret societies like Freemasons were established.
2. The French Revolution was a period of social and political upheal in France.
3. Masonry was introduced in the Philippines in 1856 when a Spanish naval officer organized a lodge in
Cavite under the auspices of the Portuguese gran Oriente Lusitano. However the true roots of
Philippine Masonry sprouted in 1889 when Graciano Lopez-Jaena organized the Logia Revolucion in
Barcelona under the auspices of Grande Oriente Espanol.
4. Propaganda Movement was propelled by the execution of the three priests, GomBurZa, in 1872,
which left a profound effect on many Filipinos including Jose Rizal.
5. The La Liga Filipina was established by Jose Rizal when he decided to return to the Philippines to
continue to call for reforms through legal means.
LEARNING ACTIVITY 1
LEARNING CONTENTS
Every year. the country commemorates the anniversary of the Philippine Independence proclaimed on 12
June 1898 in the province of Cavite. Ln such event is a significant turning point in the history of the country
because it signaled the end of the 333 years of Spanish colonization. There have the numerous studies done
on the events leading to the independence of the country but very few students had the chance to read the
actual document the declaration. This is in spite of the historical importance of the documents and the details
that the documents reveal on the rationale and circumstances of that historical day in Cavite. Interestingly,
reading the details of the said document in hindsight is telling of the kind of government that was area
under Aguinaldo, and the forthcoming hand of the United States of America in the next few years of the newly
created republic. The declaration was a short 2,000-word document which summarized the reason behind the
revolution against Spain, the war for independence, and the future of new republic under Emilio Aguinaldo.
The proclamation commenced with n characterization of the condition in the Philippines during the Spanish
colonial period, The documents specifically mentioned abuses and inequalities in the colony. The declaration
says:
The above passage demonstrates the justifications behind the revolution against Spain. Specifically cited are
the abuse by the Civil Guards and the unlawful shooting of prisoners whom they alleged as attempting to
escape. The passage also condemned the unequal protection of the law between the Filipino people and the
“eminent personages." Moreover, the. line mentioned the avarice and greed of the clergy like the friars and
the Archbishop himself. Lastly, the passage also condemned what they see as the unjust deportation
and rendering of other decision without proper hearing. expected of any civilized nation. From here, the
proclamation proceeded with a brief historical overview of the Spanish occupation since Magellan's arrival in
Visayas until the Philippine revolution, with specific details about the latter, especially after the Pact of Biak-
na-Bato has collapsed. The document narrated the spread of the movement “like an electric spark" through
different towns and provinces like Bataan, Pampanga, Batangas, Bulacan, Laguna and Morong and the quick
decline of Spanish forces in the same. provinces. The revolt also reached Visayas thus the independence of
the country was ensured. The document also made mention of Rizal's execution, calling it unjust. The
execution, as written in the document, was done to “please the greedy body of friars in their insatiable desire
to seek revenge upon and exterminate all those who are opposed to their Machiavellian purposes, which
tramples upon the penal code prescribed for these islands." The document also narrated the Cavite
Mutiny of January 1872 that caused the infamous execution of the martyred native priests Jose Burgos.
Mariano Gomez and Jacinta Zamora, “whose innocent blood was shed through the intrigues of those so-
called religious orders" that incited the three secular priests in the said mutiny.
The proclamation of independence also invoked that the established republic would be led under the
dictatorship of Emilio Aguinaldo. The first mention was at the very beginning of the proclamation. It stated:
“in the town of Cavite Viejo, in this province of Cavite, on the
twelfth day ofJune eighteen hundred and ninety-eight, before
me, Don Ambrosio Riandres Bautista, Auditor of War and
Special Commissioner appointed to proclaim and solemnize
this act by the Dictatorial Government of these Philippine
Islands. for the purposes and by virtue of the circular
addressed by the Eminent Dictator of the same Don Emilio
Aguinaldo y Famy."
The same was repeated toward the last part of the proclamation. It
states:
‘ “We acknowledge. approve and confirm together with the
orders that have been issued therefrom. the Dictatorship
established by Don Emilio Aguimnldo. whom we honor as the
Supreme Chief of this Nation. which this day commences to
have a life of its own. in the belief that he is the instrument
selected by God. in spite of his humble origin. to effect the
redemption of this unfortunate people, :13 foretold by Doctor
Katipunan’s foundation. Bonifacio and his co-founders were also left out. It can be argued thus,
that the way of historical narration found in the document also refects the politics of the victors.
The enmity between Aguinaldo's Magdalo and and Bonifacios’s Magdiwang in the Katipunan is no
secret in the pages of our history. On the contrary. the war led by Aguinaldo's men with the forces of the
United States were discussed in detail. The point is. even official records and documents like the proclamation
of independence while truthful most of the time, still exude the politics
and biases of whoever is in power. This manifests in the selectiveness of information that can be found
in these records. It is the task of the historian,
thus to analyze the content of these documents in relation to the dominant politics and the contexts of
people and institutions surrounding it. This tells us a lesson on taking primary sources like official government
records within the circumstance of this production. Studying one historical subject thus
entails looking at multiple primary sources and pieces of historical evidences
in order to have a more nuanced and contextual analysis of our past.
LEARNING ACTIVITY 3
REFERENCES
Candelaria, John Lee P., Alporha, Veronica C. (2018) Readings in the Philippine History First Editio, Rex
Book Storer, Inc. (RBSI) WITH MAIN OFFICE AT 856 Nicanor Reyes Sr. St., Sampaloc Manila
Torres, Jose Victor (2018) Batis Sources in Philippine History, C & E Publishing Inc. 839 Edsa, South
Trinagle, Quezon City