Falconer Don The Square and Compasses - Volume 1 (PDF)

The Square and Compasses Volume 1 – by Donald H. B.
Falconer
THE SQUARE AND COMPASSES
IN SEARCH OF FREEMASONRY
DONALD H B FALCONER
MASONIC QUALIFICATIONS of W. M.
Bro. Donald H.B.Falconer
Craft: PM, PDGDC, Scottish Constitution,

NSW Constitution
Previously also English Constitution
Royal Arch: PZ, PDGDC,

Scottish Constitution
Cryptic Council: PTIM,

Previously also English Constitution
Lodge & Council: PWCN, PMEC,

Allied Masonic Degrees:

PM, DGSW, PGStBr,
English Constitution
Holy Royal Arch Knight Templar Priests:

PHP, PGIVP, English Constitution
Ancient & Accepted Scottish Rite:

PMWS, PGC, 31º,
Worshipful Society of Free Masons, Rough Masons, Wallers, Slaters, Paviors, Plaisterers
and Bricklayers ("Operatives": VIIº, SPM, DGMM
Page 1 of 103
The Square and Compasses Volume 1 – by Donald H. B. Falconer
Also a member of the following Orders for more than forty years:
Royal Order of Scotland
The Order of the Temple,
Scottish Constitution.
Rome and the Red Cross of Constantine etc,
Previously Scottish Constitution, now NSW Constitution
Previously also a long-term member of the following Orders:

Order of the Secret Monitor, English and then NSW Constitution
Societas Rosicruciana in Scotia
Table of Contents
PREAMBLE
CHAPTER ONE – THE ORIGIN AND EVOLUTION OF SPECULATIVE
FREEMASONRY
Speculative Foundations
Mankind In Pre-History
The Earliest Freemasons
The Development Of Literacy
Monumental Masonry
Classical Masonry
Cathedral Masonry
CHAPTER TWO – FREEMASONRY AND RELIGION
The Rise Of Civilisation
What Is Freemasonry
Early Masonry
Temple Masonry
Classical Masonry
Cathedral Masonry
Modern Freemasonry Emerges
The Templar Influence
Other Influences On Freemasonry
Retrospect
CHAPTER THREE - THE LEGACY OF OPERATIVE FREEMASONRY
Origins
Masonry Through The Ages
The Freemason And His Lodge
English Operative Lodges
Scottish Operative Lodges
Irish Operative Lodges
Early “Non-Operative” Masons
Early Speculative Lodges
The “Mason Word”
Ceremonial
The Missing Stones
Page 2 of 103
Ground Plans
CHAPTER FOUR – HISTORY, A KEY ELEMENT IN MASONRY
Background
The Ancient Charges In Summary
The Liberal Arts And Sciences
The Foundation Of The Crafts
The Two Pillars
Nimrod And The Tower Of Babel
The Call Of Abraham
The Temple At Jerusalem
Freemasonry In France
Freemasonry In England
Freemasonry In Scotland
Freemasonry In Ireland
CHAPTER FIVE – SPECULATIVE CRAFT FREEMASONRY
Guild Masonry
Operative Influences
Modern Speculative Craft Freemasonry
The Purpose Of Freemasonry
CHAPTER SIX – THE PRECEPTS OF FREEMASONRY
In The Beginning
The First Principle
Behaviour And Responsibility
Social Conduct
Integrity
The Moral Virtues
The Social Virtues
The Intellectual Virtues
CHAPTER SEVEN - THE SYMBOLS OF FREEMASONRY
Symbols In Antiquity
Symbols In The Sacred Writings
The Origin Of Masonic Symbols
The Scope Of Masonic Symbolism
The Mystical Theme
Further Reading
CHAPTER EIGHT - THE TRADITIONAL DEGREES IN FREEMASONRY
The Medieval Freemasons
Medieval Lodges
The Ceremonials In Medieval Lodges
The Foundations
The Solomonic Degrees
The First Temple
The Second Temple
The Allied Masonic Degrees
The Colours And Symbolism Of The Regalia
The Operative Free Masons
Page 3 of 103
Other Orders
CHAPTER NINE – THE PILGRIMAGE AND SYMBOLISM OF THE ANCIENT AND
ACCEPTED SCOTTISH RITE
Introduction
The Craft Lodge or Preparatory Degrees
The Lodge of Perfection
The Council of Princes of Jerusalem
The Sovereign Chapter of Princes Rose Croix
The Philosophic Degrees of the Sovereign Council
The Search for Truth in the Sovereign Council
The Moralistic Teachings of the Sovereign Council
Consecration as Knight Kadosh
The Work of the Consistory
Page 4 of 103
PREAMBLE
Freemasonry has played a positive role in the development of civilisation and the
advancement of moral attitudes and religious observances in all ages of recorded history.
Ever since our primitive ancestors first began to think about their origins and to
contemplate the existence of a divine creator, freemasonry has played a vital role in the
development of civilisation and the parallel growth of religion. Few realise how important
freemasonry has been in establishing the welfare of human beings. In this context, the
origins of freemasonry have been examined and its accomplishments as a civilising force
have been traced through the evolution of the human race. The precepts and teachings of
freemasonry, which reflect freemasonry’s humanitarian and religious associations during
the last ten millennia or longer, also are considered in some detail.
This book differs from the usual books on freemasonry, both in its subject matter and in its
approach to the various subjects covered. It gathers together a series of discussion papers
prepared by the author and presented to various masonic bodies during the last forty years.
It is intended to provide a stimulus and hopefully an inspiration for anyone wanting to
know how freemasonry originated and what it is about. The original papers were prepared
as separate entities, each intended to consider some specific aspect of freemasonry.
References to subjects beyond the scope of a paper, but about which it would be helpful for
the reader to have some knowledge, are as brief as possible consistent with their bearing
upon the discussion. Related aspects of importance usually are covered in separate papers.
Most of the assembled papers have been revised and amplified more than once, many
several times, to reflect the latest archaeological discoveries and related research, as well
as the continuing developments in science. In this respect the advances in knowledge that
have been achieved during the second half of the twentieth century have been truly
remarkable.
The original papers have been incorporated into this book as chapters arranged in a logical
sequence. The author hopes that each chapter will provide a useful basis for discussions by
interested groups. The texts of the papers have therefore been used without change, no
attempt having been made to consolidate the subject matter, nor to remove references to
related aspects. For this reason similar references may appear in more than one chapter, for
which the author offers no apology. Although most chapters could be presented and
discussed in a single session, sometimes more than one session would be appropriate for
the scope and importance of the subject. Publications the author thinks are of particular
interest in relation to a subject are referred to at the appropriate place in the text.
Contrary to a hypothesis sometimes put forward, speculative freemasonry is not a recent

invention, but evolved in lodges of operative freemasons in conjunction with the practice
of the stonemason's craft. Humans differ from other animals, because they have an
insatiable curiosity concerning their origins and the environment in which they live. As a
direct consequence of this, speculative freemasonry developed in lodges of operative
Page 5 of 103
freemasons as a natural extension of the mental and spiritual attempts of human beings to
unravel their origins, to comprehend the meaning of life and to perceive their ultimate
destiny. The environment in which operative freemasons worked and the tools and
methods they employed were unique sources of inspiration, as well as providing an ideal
basis for symbolic representation that was always ready to hand. Although freemasonry
began in ancient times as an entirely practical enterprise, to satisfy the needs of day-to-day
life, the advancement of civilisation soon involved the craft in the construction of buildings
for various religious purposes. This intimate and continuing association with moral and
spiritual influences naturally encouraged the growth of the speculative aspects of
freemasonry, which evolved concurrently with the operative art.
The progress of freemasonry, from the times of the nomadic hunter-gatherers until the
introduction of purely speculative freemasonry in the eighteenth century, is a continuing
theme in this book. Of paramount importance was the positive role played by freemasonry
in the development of civilisation and the advancement of moral attitudes and religious
observances in all ages of recorded history. In the fulfilment of its role, freemasonry has
always provided its services without regard to the race, religion or creed of the people,
wherever the freemasons may have been working. This approach has been perpetuated in
speculative freemasonry, in which members are required to be of good character and to
have a belief in God, irrespective of race or religion. All of these aspects have been
discussed in this book, in which the author has attempted to show the relationship between
freemasonry and the people of the land in diverse countries and over a long spectrum of
time. The principles, tenets and symbolism of freemasonry have also been compared with
the religious beliefs of the people in the various countries as and when they are relevant to
the discussion.
Although reference is made to many of the long held beliefs concerning the origins and
purpose of freemasonry, it is not the author’s intention in this book to perpetuate any that
are not sustainable. On the contrary, it has been the author's endeavour only to illustrate the
way in which freemasonry probably evolved and to show how it has been a positive
influence in the everyday life of humanity from time immemorial. It must also be
emphasised that any opinions expressed and views incorporated in this book are those of
the author. They may or may not be accepted or supported by some or any of the Grand
Lodges and other controlling bodies to which the various masonic organizations owe
allegiance.
Finally, the author expresses his sincere appreciation to all those who have shown an
interest in his papers and have participated in discussions with him these many years past
and still do. Without their support and encouragement the original papers would not have
been prepared, nor would the publication of this book have come to fruition. Special
thanks are due to my wife Jean for her forbearance and for proofreading every paper when
it was written; also to my eldest son, Brother Graeme Falconer, for his critical review of
the final draft, especially in respect to the historical, philosophical and scientific
information presented; and to Brother Lowell Tarling for his invaluable assistance - he was
the driving force behind the publication of my papers in book form. The author will feel
Page 6 of 103
well rewarded if his book proves to be of interest and benefit to freemasons and to any
others of an enquiring mind who may read it.
Donald H B Falconer
Sydney, N.S.W.
November 1999
Page 7 of 103
CHAPTER ONE – THE ORIGIN

AND EVOLUTION OF
SPECULATIVE FREEMASONRY
Unlike other animals, humans have an insatiable curiosity concerning their origins.
Speculative Foundations
Speculative freemasonry is a natural extension of the spiritual and mental attempts of
humans to unravel their origins, to comprehend the meaning of life and to perceive their
ultimate destiny. Although purely speculative lodges are of recent origin, speculative
freemasonry is as old as the operative art itself. Moreover, those who established the first
purely speculative lodges that led to the formation of the early Grand Lodges in the
eighteenth century, did not invent the speculative rituals. These early speculative
freemasons were intellectual men who saw great value in existing rituals, which they
culled, collated and codified into the form used in speculative ceremonials. In so doing
they were careful to ensure that every passage of ritual was expressed appropriately in the
best language of the day. The resulting rituals neither did nor could include all the
available material, because the work in operative lodges had many local variations, but
were a sound basis for the speculative ceremonials.
It must be emphasised that those who established the early speculative lodges did not see
the ritual work as an end in itself, but rather as a foundation for philosophical discussion.
The ceremonials used in the lodge room should be an unobtrusive vehicle, subsidiary to the
primary function of communicating one’s thoughts to others. These ceremonials have been
standardised to relieve the participants’ minds of extraneous matters, that otherwise might
impede clear thought and hinder the delivery of the charges. However, word perfect
delivery of the ritual has no value unless communicated to the recipient in such a manner
as to engage his mind, arouse his interest and incite his comprehension. Nor should the
words of the ritual be the sole instruction, because they are intended to provide a sound
basis on which to establish discussions on subjects of relevance and interest. Unlike other
animals, humans have an insatiable curiosity concerning their origins and the environment
in which they live. Since recorded history began some 6,000 years ago, there is continuing
evidence of mythologies and religions being developed in an attempt to provide answers to
these concerns, which also is the purpose of speculative freemasonry. To appreciate how
freemasonry developed and influenced humanity, it is important to consider the origins of
the human race and the evolution of human beings themselves.
Page 8 of 103
Mankind In Pre-History
It is presently considered that the physical universe as we now know it has existed for
about 20,000 million years, although our solar system is much younger, having been
formed only about 4,600 million years ago. Although the first living organisms on earth
probably came into existence about 3,500 million years ago, they appear to have remained
unchanged for several thousand million years. Life first flourished in the seas, but dry land
was not successfully colonised until about 400 million years ago, when all the present
continents were still intact, forming a single continent called Pangaea. It was about 100
million years ago when the present continents began to split apart, reaching their present
configuration around 40 million years ago at the height of the last great Ice Age, when so
much water was locked up in the polar ice caps that the sea level fell, exposing most of the
continental shelf areas. The ice caps and glaciers had retreated to roughly their present
positions by about 8000 BCE.
The most recent investigations of archaeologists and palaeontologists suggest that the
ramapithecines, which lived from 14 to 8 million years ago and flourished across Africa,
Asia and Europe, might be our earliest hominid ancestors, distinguishing us from all other
primates. But this is by no means certain, because the ramapithecines are followed by a
gap of some 4 million years in the fossil record, after which several hominid species begin
to appear. A more recent and more certain ancestor is called Homo habilis, which signifies
skilful man, who lived in the Rift Valley of East Africa about 2 million years ago and
survived for almost a million years. Our most recent forebear seems to have been Homo
erectus, which signifies upright man, who lived for about 1.5 million years. Modern
humans have been in existence for 100,000 years or so and belong to the branch Homo
sapiens, which signifies wise man. Human occupation of the earth has been for a very
short period indeed when compared with the age of the universe.
The first 50,000 years of the existence of Homo sapiens was almost at the end of the Old
Stone Age, which had lasted for nearly 250,000 years. This was the period of the Early
Hunters, during which cultural advance was very slow. Nevertheless, they made a wide
range of stone implements and weapons and also achieved the control of fire, although
they could not kindle it. They could cut and stitch fur clothing, approaching the standard of
modern Eskimos, whilst both men and women ornamented themselves with necklaces and
bracelets of shells, teeth, ivory beads, mother of pearl and stone. However, their most
significant cultural advance towards the end of this period, probably was that they buried at
least some of their dead with ceremony. It was not uncommon for graves to be marked
with stones or horns and for food and implements to be placed beside the bodies. Thus, for
the first time, human beings were manifesting a belief in some form of after-life, heralding
the “age of wisdom” signified by Homo sapiens. Thereafter human development
accelerated at an ever increasing rate.
The Early Hunters usually lived in limestone and sandstone caves where these were
prevalent. In other areas they gradually learnt to use locally available materials such as
grass, reeds, mud and even mammoth bones to construct huts, as well as to make tents
from the skins of animals. In the Mediterranean region the Early Hunters developed into
Page 9 of 103
Advanced Hunters at the height of the last great Ice Age, between 35000 BCE and 30000
BCE, then into the Late Hunters who brought about the Agricultural Revolution from
region to region during the New Stone Age, which in various locations began at different
times, ranging from about 10000 BCE to about 8000 BCE. The Advanced Hunters
developed a remarkable artistic genius and were the originators of representational art.
The Gravettians of eastern and central Europe used ivory, bone, clay and even stone to
make small figurines of women and also some lively animal carvings. But the greatest
achievement of the Advanced Hunters was to develop painting, principally in the
southwest of France and in Spain. The earliest known paintings are attributed to the
Magdalenians, who most probably were descendents of the Gravettians. Their paintings
were made between 15000 BCE and 10000 BCE, mostly deep inside caves and far from
the hearth and living area. Many of their cave roofs are crowded with paintings of bison
and other animals in the polychrome style, using powdered ochre, haematite and
manganese applied moist with brush, pad or blowpipe. This period also is noted for being
the first when stone was used in construction, albeit in the simplest form. Although natural
caves are quite common in the eastern Mediterranean, huts with circular stone footings
were built in Palestine and Syria, probably with light domed coverings made from twigs
and daub. There is evidence that at about the same time on the plains of Mesopotamia,
where there are no caves, shelters with stone footings were also used, probably with
superstructures of reeds. These people, the Advanced Hunters of around 10000 BCE,
therefore were the unlikely progenitors of architecture and masonry.
The Earliest Freemasons

The humble beginnings of the Agricultural Revolution, ushered in by the Late Hunters in
the New Stone Age, laid the foundation of civilisation and provided the necessary impetus
for its subsequent growth. True farming was first developed in the uplands that sweep to
the east and north on the flanks of the valley of the fertile crescent formed by the Tigris
and Euphrates Rivers. This was the natural area for development, because the wild
ancestors of wheat, barley, sheep and goats were all native there, while the upland valleys
generally provided fertile soil and good water supplies. The oldest known evidence of the
domestication of sheep and goats is to be found in this area, dating from about 8200 BCE,
possibly earlier. As the cropping and grinding of cereals and the herding and domestication
of animals developed, the small upland settlements extended down into the fertile valley,
where villages began to form in about 6000 BCE. Mixed farming had been carried to the
fertile plain of Thessaly in Greece at about the same time, thence southwards to the
Peloponnese, to Crete and to Cyprus.
The population grew in line with these developments and settlements became larger and
more permanent. As a result of this impetus, mud bricks were first made in Mesopotamia
and the Eastern Mediterranean and used to construct houses. The early bricks were shaped
by hand, as at Jericho, but later the mud was rammed into moulds. The use of stone for
walls and dykes also became more prevalent. The largest villages may then have held up to
5,000 people, but generally were much smaller. Jericho is probably the oldest city in the
world and when constructed around 8000 BCE it occupied 4 hectares. It was surrounded
Page 10 of 103
by a massive stone wall 3 metres thick and 4 metres high, against which was constructed at
least one circular tower of rock 10 metres in diameter and 8.5 metres high, with a built in
stairway. This is the world’s oldest structure known at present. Jericho was abandoned for
a period, but was colonised again in about 7000 BCE. The town walls were not renewed,
but rectangular houses of mud brick with high quality plastered walls and floors spread
over the whole site. Jericho was abandoned and reoccupied a number of times thereafter
and perhaps is best known for its destruction by Joshua in Biblical times.
Two other events in this period also were of particular significance, these being the
construction of some of the earliest known religious buildings at Çatal Hüyük in Turkey
and the construction of what have become known as beehive houses at Khirokitia in
Cyprus. The beehive houses were circular in plan, around 8 to 10 metres in diameter, with
high thresholds to keep out surface water. Their foundations were of stone, which was
carried to a height of about 2 metres, while the superstructures were corbelled vaults
constructed of mud brick and of sufficient height to accommodate a bedroom gallery
accessed by ladder or stairway. The ground level compartment was partitioned as required
with mud brick walls which also served as supports for the gallery. These beehive houses
continued to be used in Cyprus until supplanted by more conventional houses in about
5000 BCE, perhaps even more recently. The mud brick vaulted arch was a significant
advance in architectural design and construction, paving the way for arch construction in
stone. The beehive houses in Cyprus typified the advances made in design and construction
by the earliest masons.
Çatal Hüyük was occupied from about 6500 BCE to 5500 BCE and covered an area of 13
hectares. It is thought to have had a population of 6,000 at its peak, comprising three
different races nowhere else found together in that period. The houses were rectangular
timber framed structures, with mud brick exterior walls and flat mud roofs placed on
closely packed timber poles supported by timber rafters, furnished with hearths, platforms,
benches and ovens. Among the houses was a series of elaborately decorated shrines, which
were similar to the houses in construction and furnishings, though frequently larger. Their
sanctuaries were decorated with wall paintings, plaster reliefs, cult statues and animal
heads. The richly coloured wall paintings frequently depicted hands and ritual or magic
hunting scenes, but the most unusual painting found was a unique landscape depicting a
terraced town of individual houses and blocks of houses and shrines, with a volcano
erupting in the background. The dead of successive generations of the same family were
buried with appropriate grave goods within the platforms of the shrines. This indicates a
significant advance in religious thought, even though the crude and sometimes barbarous
manifestations within the shrines are in stark contrast with the religious inspiration of
architecture and art that was soon to blossom with civilisation.
Operative freemasonry, by its nature, requires repeated speculation concerning the siting of
the structure and the building work in progress, no matter how primitive the building might
be. Before work commences it is necessary to consider the availability of materials and
their suitability for the intended structure, having regard to the type and dimensions of the
building and the conditions at the site. The best location and orientation of the structure
must be determined for the available site. Sound and level foundations must be provided to
Page 11 of 103
support the structure properly. Care must be taken to provide suitable and adequate
drainage. The dimensions must be delineated on the ground before erection can commence.
The walls must be plumbed, the corners must be squared and the tops of walls must be
levelled during erection, to ensure that the structure is both stable and pleasing to the eye.
Even the earliest stonemasons had to accomplish some or all of these operations, which
required constructive thought that inevitably would heighten their awareness to things
other than their immediate requirements. For example, after they had constructed walls of
rough stones, they soon realised the advantages of regular bricks and used their ingenuity
to provide them. Later when tools were available to cut stones, they saw the advantage of
using larger stone blocks. Thus, in a practical sense, speculative freemasonry was born
from a consideration of physical requirements, which led to a contemplation of the tools
and actions required to achieve the desired outcomes and hence their symbolic meaning.
The Development Of Literacy

The next important period of development was from 5000 BCE to 3000 BCE, roughly
coinciding with the copper age and ushering in the first of monumental architecture found
in Egypt and Mesopotamia. Using the simplest of raw materials, principally mud brick and
imported timber, the local inhabitants achieved remarkable results. Egypt concentrated on
huge royal tombs. The mastaba tombs of the First Dynasty are typical and were decorated
externally to represent a palace facade. Efforts in Mesopotamia were concentrated on
temple building. Their temples rapidly grew larger, more complex and externally more
impressive, as typified by Eridu, in Sumer, where a continuous series of temples has been
distinguished from about 5500 BCE to 3000 BCE. At Arpachiya, in northern
Mesopotamia, circular houses were constructed similar to the earlier beehive houses of
Cyprus, which were usually extended by a rectangular gable roofed wing, the unit being
called a tholos. Another notable development was the fortified settlement at Dimini in
Greece, one of the earliest towns known in Europe, which was dominated by the megaron
palace with its pillared porch. Dimini was encircled by six concentric walls of undressed
limestone and was provided with narrow gateways and passages to form a defensive
system.
Although great advances were made in architecture and the development of cities during
this period, the greatest achievement undoubtedly was the dawning of literate civilisation.
The Sumerians of the southern plain of Mesopotamia, in about 4500 BCE, first drew
cuneiform pictograms that represented actual material objects, to assist in the recording of
inventories for grain, cattle and other commodities. The turning point came when it was
realised that a sign could also stand for a sound, when phonetic writing began. But as the
scribal profession and schools developed, the system of combined ideograms and phonetics
became extremely complicated and it was not until about 3500 BCE that writing had been
forged into a practical vehicle for the communication of language. Meanwhile the
Egyptians were developing hieroglyphic writing, incorporating a combination of signs for
ideas and also for sounds like our alphabet. Hieroglyphs were first used about 3300 BCE.
The Egyptian word for writing signified “speech of the gods”, which reflected its use for
inscriptions of the divine pharaohs, contrasting with the cuneiform writing which was used
in Sumeria primarily for the keeping of accounts.
Page 12 of 103
Emphasis on the erection of larger and more complex buildings, palaces, temples, shrines,
monumental works and sepulchral structures increased continually, which meant that
construction was no longer a simple task for a small gang of stonemasons, so that larger
and more highly skilled gangs of freemasons began to develop. To enable the work to be
carried out successfully it would have been necessary for the chief of the builders, or
master mason, to arrange training and supervision for very large gangs of masons and
allied workers. This must have been an extremely difficult task, especially as working
instructions could not then be given in writing. The only means of tuition available to them
was by catechism, aided by sketches on slate or an earthen floor, which constituted their
tracing boards. Archaeological investigations have provided overwhelming proof that,
despite these difficulties, the early masons constructed many outstanding edifices with a
remarkably high standard of finish.
Instruction in the speculative aspects of freemasonry must have begun in this fashion, from
which the modern systems developed. Moreover, the continuing involvement in the
construction of shrines, temples, cathedrals, monuments and sepulchral buildings that
masons have had through all ages, must have induced them to contemplate the meaning of
life and the certainty of death, as well as to seek an understanding of the hereafter, much
more so than would have been usual among the general population. This would have
contributed significantly to the speculative aspects of masonry and would also have
fostered symbolic explanations of the mason’s implements of labour. As in the present day,
many relevant masonic expressions became a part of the everyday languages of those
ancient times, which were recorded with the advent of cursive script. The philological
evidence proves beyond doubt that at least some elements of symbolism and speculative
thought must have been included in the instruction given in lodges of operative freemasons
from the earliest days.
A host of symbolic references in masonic terms are to be found in the scriptures, many of
which are as well known as the following examples. During his visit to Bethel in about 745
BCE, Amos prophesied the fall of Israel about thirty years before the event, when he said
in Amos 7:7-9 that the Lord had “measured his people Israel with a plumb line” and
found them to be irremediably warped by sin. In the reign of Manasseh, the murderous and
idolatrous king who ruled from 696 BCE to 642 BCE, the captivity of Judah by Babylon
around 606 BCE was foretold in II Kings 21:13, when the Lord said he would “stretch
over Jerusalem the measuring line of Samaria and the plummet of the house of Ahab”.
In Isaiah 28:16, which was written between 750 BCE and 700 BCE, the coming of Christ
is foretold in the words “Behold I am laying in Zion for a foundation a stone, a tested
stone, a precious corner stone, of a sure foundation.” This prophesy is referred to in I
Peter 2:6-8, in about 60 CE, when the death of the Messiah is alluded to and “for those
who do not believe” the following significant words were added: “The very stone which
the builders rejected has become the head of the corner, a stone that will make men
stumble, a rock that will make them fall”. Other passages from the book of Genesis,
together with many of the traditions preserved in Sumerian, Assyrian and Hebrew
literature, also provide some interesting sidelights on masonry.
Page 13 of 103
In Genesis 4:19-22 we read that Lamech, a descendant of Cain, had two wives Adah and
Zillah. Adah bore two sons, Jabal and Jubal, the former being recorded as “the father of
those who dwell in tents and have cattle” and the latter as “the father of all those who
play the lyre and pipe”. Traditionally, Jabal is also said to be the founder of geometry and
the first mason who built stone walls and houses of stone. Zillah bore a son Tubal-cain and
a daughter Naamah. Tubal-cain is recorded as “the forger of all instruments of bronze
and iron” and Zillah is referred to in the traditions as the founder of weaving. These four
are thus credited with the origin of civilised society. We also read in Genesis 10:8-11 that
Nimrod was “the first man on earth to be a mighty man”, that he was “a mighty hunter”
and that “he built Nineveh . . . . that is the great city”. In the traditional histories of the
medieval operative freemasons it is said that masons first came into prominence during the
building of the Tower of Babel, which is the first structure mentioned in the scriptures, in
Genesis 11:1-9. The traditional history also says that Nimrod was a master mason who
loved the craft, formed his masons into lodges and gave them a charter and a charge when
he sent them forth to build all the cities in his kingdom. Although it is impossible at
present to date events such as these with any accuracy, they must have occurred around the
beginning of the Agricultural Revolution, when civilisation was being established after the
flood.
Monumental Masonry
By 3000 BCE the Egyptians had developed a calendar with 365 days to the year, from
which time their historical records are accurate. The development of writing and literature
continued apace in Sumeria, but Egypt was supreme in the visual arts and architecture.
Civilisation began to flourish and monumental masonry developed on an immense scale
and with unprecedented complexity. The three Great Pyramids of Giza in Egypt and the
huge Ziggurat of Urnammu in Mesopotamia are typical of this period. Although the scale
of building in Mesopotamia was not as huge as in Egypt, the Mesopotamians were more
innovative in their use of the arch, which they used extensively in tombs. The oldest true
arches presently known were found in the Sumerian tombs of the Royal Cemetery at Ur,
constructed from 2700 BCE to 2370 BCE. The art of writing continued to develop in the
Near East and its use was becoming more widespread. Signs unearthed at Byblos in
Lebanon, dating from about 2500 BCE, are in a script similar to that then used in Syria.
Pottery from the period 2100 BCE to 1700 BCE found at Byblos and Sidon, also in
Lebanon, provide some of the earliest evidence of the use of a linear script that is called
pseudo-hieroglyphics. This was an early form of non-Egyptian alphabetic script variously
designated as Canaanite, Sinaitic or proto-Phoenician.
This simpler script progressively replaced the syllabic cuneiform scripts of Babylonia and
Syria and the complex hieroglyphic writing of Egypt, so that by about 1500 BCE an
alphabet was in general use. From this alphabet were progressively derived the Phoenician
about 1000 BCE, early Hebrew about 700 BCE, old Greek also about 700 BCE and formal
Greek about 500 BCE, whence the Roman was derived. The development of writing as a
familiar medium in an era of prodigious monumental construction, while moral and
religious teaching was advancing, must have fostered the speculative aspects of
freemasonry. They would also have received considerable impetus during the building of
Page 14 of 103
the magnificent temple of King Solomon completed at Jerusalem in about 950 BCE. The
later desecration of the temple and its destruction by Nebuchadnezzar about 587 BCE must
have had a serious impact on the faith of the freemasons, but it would have been renewed
by the decree issued by Cyrus in 538 BCE, allowing the captives in Babylon to return to
Jerusalem to rebuild the house of the Lord. The Bible records that the foundations were
laid under the leadership of Sheshbazzar, but that the turbulence of the people in the
surrounding areas impeded the work and necessitated Zerubbabel’s return to Babylon to
obtain the support of Cyrus in quelling the disturbances. The reconstruction of the temple
was completed by Joshua in about 515 BCE, under the leadership of Zerubbabel. It has
been suggested that Sheshbazzar and Zerubbabel were the same person, but research
indicates that Sheshbazzar almost certainly was Zerubbabel’s uncle. The Jewish historian,
Flavius Josephus, records in Antiquities that 1,000 priests were trained as masons when
Zerubbabel’s temple was restored and enlarged by Herod during the period 20 BCE to 64
CE. Although they were mainly engaged in building the shrine, the priest-masons must
have influenced speculative freemasonry significantly.
Classical Masonry
The emergence of Greece as a colonising nation and centre of learning, art, and religious
thought in the eastern Mediterranean, in about 1100 BCE, heralded the era of classical
masonry. Their first stone temples were erected at Corinth and Isthmia before 650 BCE,
whence the Doric order originated, followed by the temples at Corfu and Ephesus within
the next hundred years, whence the Ionic order originated. The Corinthian order was first
used in Delphi around 390 BCE. Even in Rome, Greek architecture prevailed around the
Mediterranean and temples proliferated until the ascendancy of Rome itself. Without doubt
the most famous classical Greek structures are the Parthenon of Athens and its surrounding
structures, built between 447 BCE and 432 BCE. Because of the importance that the
Greeks placed on the ancient Mysteries in classical times and which continued into the
turbulent period of Roman rule, the Mysteries inevitably would have been the prototype for
moralistic reasoning and ritualistic procedures in those days and are still reflected in
masonic ceremonials.
Rome began to expand her territory by taking Carthage and Corinth in 146 BCE and
Pergamum in 133 BCE. By 100 BCE Rome’s territory nearly encircled the Mediterranean
and by 117 CE the Roman empire was at its greatest in strength and extent. Rome
developed cities and constructed amphitheatres and temples apace throughout its region of
influence, particularly in the Middle East. Of the Roman era, the two most celebrated
structures probably are the Colosseum in Rome and the temple complex at Baalbek in
Lebanon, about 50 kilometres inland from Beirut. This temple complex was built in several
stages on the podium of an ancient temple, over a period of almost 300 years, finally being
completed in about 260 CE. When Baalbek became part of Ptolemy’s Egyptian empire in
332 BCE, until the Roman occupation in about 30 BCE, it was the religious centre of the
region and called Heliopolis in Phoenicia. The temples are remarkable for their size and
architectural finish. Many stones in the foundation courses are 4 metres square in cross-
section and 20 metres long, each weighing up to 800 tonnes. There also are monolithic
columns of pink granite that were brought from Aswan in Egypt and stand 19.6 metres tall.
Page 15 of 103
It would have been a major feat to transport those columns from the quarries in Aswan by
land to the Nile River; load them onto barges and transport them almost 1,000 kilometres
down the Nile River and about 500 kilometres across the Mediterranean Sea, probably to
Saidon or Tyre; unload them from the barges and then haul them overland for almost 200
kilometres, crossing a mountain range in the process to reach Baalbek, which is in a valley
at an elevation of about 1,150 metres above sea level. Even in modern times this would be
a substantial project.
Cathedral Masonry
The decline and fall of the Roman empire heralded the beginning of the final phase in
speculative evolution, the medieval period of almost continuous cathedral building in
Britain and Europe that lasted from 500 until at least 1700. In England the operative or
Guild Masons worked with royal approval at least from their Annual Assembly that is
reputed to have been authorised and encouraged by King Athelstan and held in 926.
Lodges of operative freemasons were organised under the guardianship of craft guilds,
which originally were religious fraternities. Masters of lodges were responsible for the
moral and religious welfare of their employees, especially the indentured apprentices, as
well as for their practical training in the craft. The Ancient Charges testify to this. The
Guild Masons continued to operate as religious fraternities until all such fraternities were
disendowed in 1547 under an Act issued by Henry VIII. It is clear from the old catechisms
and other records that have come down to us from the operative lodges, especially in
Scotland where the Reformation was less drastic in its effect, that moral instruction was an
integral part of the ceremonies. It is clear that the working tools were used symbolically
from an early date and that various aspects of a mason’s work were used to communicate
moral instruction. Dr James Anderson and other early speculative ritualists adopted these
methods when preparating the rituals in use today. Thus it is evident that the first Grand
Lodges in England, Ireland and Scotland were formed solely for the establishment of
alliances and the consolidation of the ritual procedures. They were not the beginning of
speculative freemasonry, but only the continuation of an evolutionary process that began in
prehistoric times.
Page 16 of 103
CHAPTER TWO – FREEMASONRY AND

RELIGION
The evolution of the human psyche awakened a belief in the existence of some higher
controlling power that has a direct connection with emotion and morality.
The Rise Of Civilisation

Civilisation began when the stone-age hunter-gatherers first captured wild animals for
domestication, established grazing and developed agriculture. From that time, the
development of civilisation was directly related to the progressive improvements in
masonry that enabled better buildings to be erected and more effective irrigation schemes
and other facilities to be constructed. With the advance of civilisation, humans developed a
consciousness of their mental and emotional life and also began to differentiate between
their physical beings, their minds and their spirits. This evolution of the human psyche
awakened a belief in the existence of some higher controlling power that, though unseen,
was felt to have a direct connection with emotion and morality. Thus evolved the concept
of god and a complementary human soul. Various rites of worship developed as a natural
outcome of these emotional and spiritual processes, whence religions came into existence.
As the nomads developed a more settled life, religious leaders soon demanded permanent
and more substantial places of worship, which only the masons could construct. Hence
masonry, which first evolved to supply some of mankind’s material requirements, also
became an indispensable agent of religion to provide for some of mankind’s spiritual
needs.
What Is Freemasonry
In the context of this discussion, freemasonry is the system of moral teaching and the
associated traditions and rituals that, in earlier times, were an important component of day-
to-day life in lodges of operative freemasons. Those systems, traditions and rituals are now
incorporated in the ceremonies of modern speculative freemasonry. When modern
speculative craft freemasons compiled the rituals now in use, they defined freemasonry as
a peculiar system of morality, veiled in allegory and illustrated by symbols. They based the
ceremonial procedures on those used in operative lodges, but adapted them for use in
social surroundings instead of in a working environment. Although the fundamental
elements of operative practice were retained, the explanations became more erudite and
lengthy. When operative freemasons were receiving instruction, the practical applications
of their working tools and the methods to be used when carrying out the work were of
primary importance, but those applications and methods were also used symbolically to
give moral instruction. In speculative lodges the emphasis is reversed.
Page 17 of 103
The ability of medieval operative freemasons to devise ceremonials similar to those used in
modern speculative lodges has often been questioned. Even a masonic writer as eminent as
A.E.Waite said that he could not imagine how “horny handed labourers” could have
developed a system of symbolism and philosophy to give moral instruction within the
lodge. R.F.Gould, the renowned masonic historian, offered a most improbable solution to
the perceived dilemma. He thought that operative masons might have accepted
“gentlemen” into their ranks to transform the operative craft into a speculative art. Both
writers seem to have overlooked the fact that the members of medieval operative lodges
included many skilled artificers who were required to work as much with their brains as
with their hands. The Master Masons had a superior knowledge and skill and were well
versed in religious matters, the graphic arts, sculpture and geometry, as well as in the
manual aspects of their trade. It will be recalled that the medieval operative freemasons
were living in the era when the rituals of the church were becoming established, when
Passion Plays were a regular feature of religious observances and pageantry was a part of
everyday life. All of these factors would have encouraged the development of ritual in the
operative lodges. In 787 the Council of Nicea confirmed the undoubted capabilities of
operative freemasons in all aspects of the design, construction and symbolic adornment of
ecclesiastical buildings, when it ruled with respect to their establishment that “the
arrangement belongs to the clergy and the execution to the artist”.
Early Masonry
About 12,000 years ago the Advanced Hunters of the Near East first used compacted earth
to construct primitive circular dwellings. They soon added stone footings, set in hard clay,
which improved stability and provided protection against the exceptionally high runoffs
that were occurring during the melt down after the last great Ice Age. With the discovery
of mud brick production, building erection was greatly enhanced, ushering in the
Agricultural Revolution started by the Late Hunters in the New Stone Age. A pre-eminent
example of early advances in masonry is a township of some four hectares constructed at
Jericho in about 8000 BCE. It included a group of round beehive houses of mud brick, at
least one round defensive stone tower and a massive stone wall surrounding the
development. Undressed water-worn stones were used, but they were split to provide a
stable laying surface and were carefully set in hard clay. The earliest known religious
buildings were constructed in about 6500 BCE at Çatal Hüyük in Turkey. The intimate
association of masonry with religion was firmly established in Mesopotamia, when the
Sumerians constructed a continuous series of temples at Eridu from before 5500 BCE until
about 3000 BCE.
The first religious structure mentioned in the Bible, the temple-tower or ziggurat called the
Tower of Babel, also was constructed during that period, probably some time before 4000
BCE. Sumerian tombs in the Royal Cemetery of Ur, constructed between 2700 BCE and
2370 BCE, are of particular interest because all were roofed in stone and buried deep in the
alluvial flood plain. They were of composite construction using limestone masonry, mud
brick, kiln fired brick and timber, because the nearest source of rock was at least 60
kilometres away. The earliest tomb had a corbel vault, but later tombs had either barrel
vaults or domes with pendentives, the spherical triangular segments that connect square
Page 18 of 103
corners to true arches. In Egypt during the same period, massive chambered tombs for
royal burials were being constructed of mud brick with flat roofs, called mastaba tombs
from the Arabic word meaning a bench. Imhotep, the renowned architect of the pharaoh
Zoser, is credited with the invention of stone masonry in Egypt. He was responsible for
what is reputed to be the first pyramid constructed of dressed stone, the Step Pyramid built
for Zoser at Saqqara around 2650 BCE. The pyramid began as a mastaba tomb about 8
metres high, which was incorporated into a rock structure raised progressively in six steps
to a height of 61 metres, fully encased in dressed Tura limestone blocks. This was an
abrupt departure from the mud brick construction previously used in Egypt.
The three pyramids of Giza are reputed to have been built for Khufu (Cheops), Khafra
(Chephren) and Menkaura (Mycerinus) during the period 2500 BCE to 2400 BCE, but the
ages of the pyramids and their assignment to specific pharaohs is based solely on doubtful
circumstantial evidence. There is mounting evidence that the pyramids of Giza might date
from as early as Zep Tepi, or the First Time of Egypt, in about 10450 BCE. This
suggestion is supported by the fact that the construction of these three pyramids differs
from and is vastly superior to that of all other pyramids in Egypt, most of which have
deteriorated badly, while many have collapsed into rubble. Unlike the later pyramids, the
pyramids of Giza did not contain mummies or funerary objects, nor did they have any
hieroglyphic inscriptions or other adornments. Moreover, there also is compelling evidence
that the arrangements of the chambers, galleries and shafts in the Great Pyramid of Khufu
are of religious significance, reflecting ancient Egyptian beliefs concerning the rebirth of
the pharaohs and the transmigration of their souls to the astral plane of the heavenly Duat.
The pyramids of Giza incorporate 12 million tonnes of dressed stone, which is forty
percent of the total mass of the eighty pyramids that were built in Egypt. Khufu’s pyramid
is the largest stone structure in the world and it incorporates about 2.5 million limestone
blocks that weigh up to 12 tonnes each, which were laid in 203 courses accurately fitted
without mortar. The external surface of Khufu’s pyramid, which is some 68,000 square
metres in area, was clad with polished limestone facing blocks weighing 15 tonnes each.
The King’s Chamber is reached through the Grand Gallery, which ascends on a slope of
26.5°. It is constructed of 30 tonne blocks of black granite from Aswan, 750 kilometres to
the south. The walls of the King’s Chamber are constructed with 70 tonne blocks of red
granite, which support a flat ceiling constructed of 50 tonne blocks. The Queen’s Chamber
is constructed of white limestone blocks and has a gabled ceiling exactly on the east-west
axis.
Temple Masonry
After the great pyramids, many magnificent temples of dressed stone were constructed in
Egypt, of which the best known are probably the remarkable complexes at Karnak that
were commenced in about 1990 BCE; also those at Abu Simbel that were commenced in
about 1200 BCE. Although the first religious structure mentioned in the Bible was the
Tower of Babel, the first that it describes in detail was the temple built by King Solomon at
Jerusalem, with the assistance of Hiram King of Tyre and his building specialists.
Completed in about 950 BCE, King Solomon’s temple was much smaller than any
Page 19 of 103
Egyptian temple, being only about 30 metres by 10 metres in plan, but its opulence has
never been surpassed. The layout of King Solomon’s temple was based on an extensive
series of Canaanite temples dating from as early as 2500 BCE and a later series built by the
Phoenicians in Syria from as early as 1400 BCE. The Phoenicians were renowned for their
building activities in the Levant and culturally they were much further advanced than the
Hebrews. In the time of Josiah, three centuries after King Solomon’s temple was
completed, it needed extensive repairs that had to be financed by the worshippers. Later, in
587 BCE, Nebuchadnezzar destroyed King Solomon’s temple when he sacked Jerusalem,
took away the Ark of the Covenant and deported the remainder of the Hebrews into
Babylonish captivity.
When Cyrus the Elamite king conquered Babylon in 539 BCE and founded the vast
Persian Empire, Judea became one of its provinces and remained so for the next 200 years.
Nevertheless, in 538 BCE Cyrus issued a decree releasing the Israelites from their
captivity, allowing them to return to Jerusalem and rebuild their temple. The return of the
Israelites to Judea commenced under the leadership of Sheshbazzar and Zerubbabel, in
about 537 BCE. Sheshbazzar was a prince of Judah whom Cyrus appointed as governor of
Judah, to whom Cyrus entrusted the temple vessels that had been looted by
Nebuchadnezzar. Sheshbazzar may have been Zerubbabel’s uncle Shenazzar, who was a
son of King Jerhoiachin. King Jehoiachin and the prophet Ezekiel were captured in 597
BCE and deported to Babylon, where Ezekiel had a grand vision for a new temple.
Sheshbazzar is believed to have been the governor of Judea who is referred to as Tirshatha
in the scriptures. Tirshatha probably is a Persian form of the Avestan tarsta, meaning
reverend, which was used as a title more or less equivalent to “His Excellency”.
Zerubbabel was the son of Salathiel and hence a grandson of King Jehoiachin. The exact
meaning of Zerubbabel is uncertain, but it is believed to signify “offspring of Babylon”.
Sheshbazzar and Zerubbabel laid the foundations of the new temple in about 535 BCE, but
Zerubbabel and Joshua the high priest were those primarily responsible for carrying out the
building work. Many difficulties were encountered as a consequence of the turbulence of
the surrounding tribes, which delayed the rebuilding of the temple and necessitated
Zerubbabel's visit to Cyrus to gain his support. The rebuilding of the temple was resumed
in about 520 BCE and completed by about 515 BCE. The return of the Israelites resumed
under Ezra in 458 BCE and continued under Nehemiah in 445 BCE. A total of some
42,360 Israelites returned to Jerusalem from Babylon. The second temple at Jerusalem is
usually called Zerubbabel's temple. It was similar to Solomon's temple, but much less
ornate than either Solomon’s temple or the temple visualised by the prophet Ezekiel.
However, Zerubbabel’s temple survived for almost 500 years, until the Roman general
Pompey captured Jerusalem in 63 BCE and the Roman consul Crassus plundered the
temple nine years later.
In 47 BCE Julius Caesar appointed Antipater, a Jew of Idumaean descent, as procurator of

Judea. Antipater then appointed his son Herod as the military prefect of Galilee. When the
Parthians invaded Syria and Palestine in 40 BCE, the Romans were so impressed by
Herod’s abilities that they appointed him “King of the Jews”. After three years of fighting,
culminating with the defeat of Cleopatra and Mark Antony in the battle of Actium, Herod
Page 20 of 103
established his position and ruled as Herod the Great from 37 BCE until his death in 4
BCE. Herod was an indefatigable builder, who decided to demonstrate his own grandeur
by restoring Zerubbabel’s temple as a much more beautiful building of twice the area. It
was set in a complex of courtyards covering an area of some ten hectares, surrounded by a
massive stone wall that was constructed using blocks mostly 1.25 metres high and 4.6
metres long. Herod trained 1,000 priests as masons and also had the work carried out in
stages, so that the ritual observances were not interrupted. Although work began in 20
BCE and the main structure was completed within ten years, the whole complex was not
completed until 64 CE. The temple was razed to the ground and burned when the Roman
armies destroyed Jerusalem in 70 CE.
Classical Masonry
Greece emerged as a colonising nation about 1100 BCE and soon become the centre of
learning, art and religious thought in the eastern Mediterranean. The era of classical
masonry began with the erection of the first of the Greek stone temples at Corinth and
Isthmia, some time before 650 BCE, where the Doric order originated. The Ionic order was
established during the next hundred years, with the construction of the temples at Corfu
and Ephesus. The Corinthian order was first used in Delphi around 390 BCE. Without
doubt the most famous of the classical Greek structures are the Parthenon and its
surrounding structures on the Acropolis in Athens, built between 447 BCE and 432 BCE.
The Parthenon was about 115 metres long and 55 metres wide, with a pitched roof and
completely surrounded by a colonnade of forty-six massive Doric columns. The Parthenon
typified the monolithic unity of Greek temples and was the ultimate expression of the
Greek city-state. The emphasis that the Greeks placed on the ancient Mysteries continued
into the turbulent period of Roman rule, which influenced the development of speculative
thought that is still reflected in masonic ceremonials. Roman architecture owes much to
Greek architecture, but is not simply an extension of it. The two most significant
differences are the greater size of the Roman buildings and the more elaborate decoration
of their interiors, which are designed to match their exteriors and to reflect the imperial
pride and growing self-awareness of the Romans.
One of the most interesting examples of Roman masonry is the temple complex at
Baalbek, on the site of an ancient holy place of the Canaanites. To provide for greater
public participation around 1200 BCE, the Canaanites constructed a raised stone court
surrounded by a stone wall, thus creating a sanctuary at the centre of which they erected a
sacrificial altar, similar to the forecourt used some 250 years later by the priests of King
Solomon’s temple. Alexander the Great defeated the Persian Empire and entered Egypt in
triumph in 332 BCE, when the Beqa’a valley became part of the Egyptian Empire and the
Ptolemies proposed building a huge temple at Baalbek. However, construction was delayed
by disputations with the Seleucids, who won the Beqa’a valley in 198 BCE under
Antiochus the Great.
When the Roman general Pompey occupied Phoenicia in 64 CE, an immense podium with
an area of about 17,000 square metres was nearing completion at Baalbek. The Temple of
Jupiter was located on the podium and had then been under construction for about four
Page 21 of 103
years. The main structure was completed in about 70 CE, but embellishments continued for
at least another sixty years. The sandstone foundation courses were laid with the largest
stones ever used in masonry construction. They were perfectly fitted without mortar and
were as large as 20 metres long and 4 metres square in cross-section, weighing as much as
800 tonnes each. The temple was surrounded by a colonnade of fifty-four of the tallest
monolithic columns that exist from antiquity. They were of pink granite brought from
Aswan in upper Egypt and had shafts 2 metres in diameter and 16.6 metres high, each
weighing 135 tonnes.
The Temple of Bacchus at Baalbek was adjacent to the Temple of Jupiter and similar in
construction, but only about half the area. Nevertheless the Temple of Bacchus was larger
than the Parthenon of Athens and is still the best preserved of all Roman temples. Also in
the Baalbek complex were the much smaller Temple of Venus and Temple of the Muses.
When the Emperor Constantine declared Christianity to be the religion of the Roman
Empire in 313 a Christian church was built in the township, but when the Emperor Julian
“the Apostate” came to power it was destroyed in 361. When Theodosius became Emperor
in the East in 379, he destroyed the altar of sacrifice and the observation tower in the Great
Court of the Temple of Jupiter and replaced them with a Christian Basilica 63 metres by 36
metres in area, raised on a podium 2 metres high. Subsequently, when Syria became an
Arab state in 637, the Basilica was converted into a palace and the Temples of Jupiter and
Bacchus were converted into a huge walled fortress with a surrounding moat. The fortress
was only abandoned when Baalbek became part of the Ottoman Empire in 1517. To this
day the Arabs know the precinct as the Kala’a, meaning a fortress.
Cathedral Masonry
The culminating phase in the evolution of speculative freemasonry followed the decline
and fall of the Roman Empire. In addition to their work constructing castles, fortifications
and other public facilities, the operative masons in Britain and Europe were engaged on an
intensive program of cathedral building that continued almost without a break from around
500 until at least 1700. It is not known how many cathedrals were built in Britain and
Europe during those 1,200 years of construction, but there were several hundred and an
even greater number of priories and other ecclesiastical buildings. Most of the finest of
those cathedrals have survived the ravages of man and nature and are still in service. In
England the operative freemasons or Guild Masons were organised with royal approval
from at least as early as the Annual Assemblage of 926, which is reputed to have been
encouraged and authorised by King Athelstan. The lodges of operative masons assembled
under the guardianship of craft guilds, which originally were in the form of religious
fraternities that continued until Henry VIII disendowed all religious fraternities by the Act
of 1547. It is evident from the old catechisms and the Ancient Charges, that the masters of
operative lodges were responsible for the moral and religious conduct of their apprentices
and fellows, as well as for their welfare and practical training in the craft of masonry. It
also is clear that the tools and working methods used by the operative masons were woven
into simple dramas that were enacted to illustrate moral principles. These dramas were
adapted by Dr James Anderson and others and incorporated in the speculative rituals still
used in masonic lodges.
Page 22 of 103
York and its Minster are of special importance in the annals of English masonry. The
present York Minster is on the site of a wooden chapel erected for the baptism of Edwin of
Deira, King of Northumbria, together with the members of his court, by Paulinus the first
Bishop of York on Easter Day in 627. The King’s Kentish wife had converted him to
Christianity, she previously having been converted to Christianity by the Roman mission
led by St Augustine, who arrived in Kent in 597. The Venerable Bede (c.673-735), who
lived in the Jarrow monastery on Tyneside from 682 until his death, records in his
Ecclesiastical History of the English People that Edwin soon replaced the chapel with a
stone church, which became the centre of the Bishopric and continued as such until the
church was burned down about 741. It was replaced by another magnificent stone church
about 55 metres long and 17 metres wide, which was commenced by Archbishop Albert in
about 767. After this church had been ruined, when the city was laid waste during the
troubles that followed the Norman Conquest, the first Norman Archbishop, Thomas de
Bayeux, began rebuilding it in about 1080. Archbishop Roger de Pont-l’Evêque rebuilt the
choir about a century later.
The present York Minster replaced the last church progressively and in distinct stages. The
first work was the addition of the south transept, which was commenced in 1220, followed
by the addition of the north transept, which was commenced in 1241. Work on the new
nave, chapter house and vestibule was commenced in 1291 and completed by about 1345.
The Norman choir was then replaced, commencing in 1361. The final stage of construction
was the erection of a central tower, which was begun in 1400 and completed in 1423,
followed by the erection of the western towers 62 metres high, which were begun in 1433
and completed in 1474, after construction had been in progress for more than 250 years.
The choir was badly damaged by fire in 1829 and the nave also was damaged by fire in
1840. When the present York Minster had been in continuous use for almost 500 years,
investigations revealed that the central tower and west end were in danger of collapse, as a
result of water erosion and fatigue in the building materials. Extensive remedial works
carried out since the 1960s have restored the foundations fully and also strengthened the
fabric of the building.
The development of the Gothic style of cathedrals in France, where the height of the
building almost became an obsession and flying buttresses were used to support the main
aisles, completes the story of the intimate association between freemasonry and religion.
The Cathedral of the Notre-Dame in Paris probably is the best-known example of this
style. It was begun in 1163 and completed when the western towers were erected in about
1240. It is noted for the lightness of the stone skeleton and the richness of its glowing
glass, which captures the genius of Gothic architecture. However, it is the world famous
Chartres Cathedral that experts consider to be the most authentic surviving example of that
most spiritual of all periods in European history. It is a cathedral church in the middle of a
town, which distinguishes Gothic cathedrals from the earlier monastic churches that were
set in the French countryside and had enclosures of cells and cloisters. Originally a small
church of unknown age was on the site, but by 1020 it had been replaced by a cathedral
almost as large as the present one. It was extended at the western end in the 1130s, when
Page 23 of 103
two bays, a vestibule and two towers framing the Royal Portal and its renowned sculptures
were added.
A dreadful fire that razed much of the township of Chartres in 1194 also destroyed the
entire first cathedral except the present western end and the crypt. Reconstruction was
commenced almost immediately and continued unabated while a dozen other cathedrals
were also under construction in the vicinity. No architect was engaged to design and
supervise the work, which was carried out under more than thirty successive contracts, or
“campaigns”, controlled by nine different Master Masons engaged cyclically throughout
the construction period. The first Master Mason prepared the original design, set out the
building and constructed the foundations in less than a year. Each of the Master Masons
was engaged more than once, but the first and some others were engaged several times.
Each successive builder made some modifications in the details of the design, but without
altering any of the work already done. The cathedral was completed during the 1230s. The
successful completion of this complicated and beautiful structure under very difficult
conditions, coupled with the proven durability of the building, demonstrates beyond all
doubt the remarkable ability, integrity and capacity of medieval freemasons.
Modern Freemasonry Emerges

Many hypotheses have been advanced about the evolution of modern speculative
freemasonry. One suggestion is that members of the four speculative lodges in London,
who joined to form the first Grand Lodge of England in 1717, invented speculative
freemasonry. Another suggestion, that once received strong support, perceives freemasonry
as a direct offshoot of the Rosicrucian movement. Two of the more tenable claims are that
freemasonry is either a direct or an indirect derivative of the medieval lodges of operative
masons. It also has been asserted that freemasonry was founded in antiquity and revived by
the Knights Templar in the Holy Land. The extensive association of the Knights Templar
with the operative masons does not appear to account for the emergence of modern
speculative freemasonry, but it undoubtedly influenced the speculative aspects of operative
freemasonry. It is surprising that those proponents, who advance one or another of these
theories, usually do not acknowledge the possibility that modern speculative freemasonry
could have evolved from more than one source. A brief review of these theories will help
to put the relationship between freemasonry and religion in its proper perspective.
It is significant that the key episodes on which the rituals are based in the degrees of the
Craft, the Mark, the Royal Arch, the Cryptic Council and their various associated orders
are all biblical events recorded in passages of scripture in the Old Testament. A well-
known example is the Hiramic legend relating to the brutal and untimely death of the
principal architect during the construction of King Solomon’s temple at Jerusalem.
Although this legend is not recounted in the Old Testament, the narrative of the legend is
ancient and many variations and amplifications of it are to be found in the Judaic
apocrypha and the earliest Talmudic traditions. In this context, the name of the central
figure in the Hiramic legend is not always the same in different versions of the Traditional
Histories of English operative masons, nor indeed is the Hiramic legend the only one that
is used. Christopher Knight and Robert Lomas, in their stimulating book entitled The
Page 24 of 103
Hiram Key, describe extensive investigations they have carried out from which they
conclude that the Hiramic legend originally referred to the murder of a Theban pharaoh,
Seqenenre Tao, in about 1600 BCE. They also suggest an interesting Egyptian derivation
of the substitute words used by a Master Mason. Though at first sight improbable, there are
many equally obscure derivations of words now in common use in the English language.
It is clear from the Cooke MS of about 1410, that by then the events concerning the
construction of the temple and the involvement of its principal architect were already
firmly established in the traditions of the guilds of operative masons. If speculative
Freemasonry had been invented in England during the period of religious fervour and
intolerance, which had prevailed for about two centuries prior to the formation of the first
Grand Lodge, the Hiramic legend probably would not have been included in the rituals and
the degrees almost certainly would have had a strong Christian emphasis, based on events
taken from the New Testament. The orders of masonry that include degrees with a
Christian basis did not appear until the 1750s and 1800s, after the first Grand Lodge of
England had been established. It is believed that some members of the lodges forming the
first Grand Lodge were Rosicrucians, who would have exerted a strong Christian influence
on modern speculative development, but there is no evidence of a direct derivation from
the Rosicrucian movement.
The weight of evidence supports the view that the ceremonials of modern speculative
freemasonry were derived indirectly from the ceremonials of English operative lodges,
through speculative lodges that probably had some operative masons as members. It is
significant that these events in England were taking place at about the same time as many
Scottish operative lodges were making a direct transition to speculative lodges. The early
stages of the development of operative masonry in England and Scotland were similar.
However, in Scotland the lodges were smaller and more dispersed, while much of the work
they carried out was under contract instead of by direct labour. In London the Fellowship
of Masons, probably established in about 1356, had an inner conclave known as the
Acception. From the 1620s its members included operative masons and also many who
were not tradesmen. The conditions prevailing during the Reformation made it necessary
to maintain the utmost secrecy within fraternities, which explains the dearth of records in
England and is the reason why it is much more difficult to establish the emergence of
speculative freemasonry in England than it is in Scotland.
In 1441 King James II appointed Sir William St Clair (now Sinclair), who was the Laird of
Roslin, as hereditary patron and protector of Scottish masons. In Edinburgh in 1475 the
Seal of Cause was issued, establishing trade regulations for masons in Scotland about a
century earlier than any similar regulations were issued in England. The Schaw Statutes of
1598 and 1599 strengthened those regulations and formalised arrangements for the
management of Scottish operative lodges. The St Clair Charters of 1601 and 1628 were
issued with the express permission of William Schaw and signed by representatives of
many widely dispersed lodges, confirming that the Lairds of Roslin had been for ages and
would continue to be patrons and protectors of the mason craft in Scotland. Records of
Scottish operative lodges from 1598 onwards indicate that ritual work was being carried
out and they frequently record that non-masons were being admitted as members. In 1736
Page 25 of 103
four old Scottish operative lodges associated in the formation of the Grand Lodge of
Scotland. Thirty-three lodges met later in 1736 and elected William St Clair, the Laird of
Roslin, as the first Grand Master Mason of Scotland. All of those lodges were or had been
operative lodges. This was significantly different from the situation prevailing when four
speculative lodges formed the first Grand Lodge in England, when few if any of the
members had been operative masons.
It would be appropriate now to consider the “de-Christianising of the Craft” that masonic
authors often mention. Any Christian influence stemmed from the fact that, when purely
speculative freemasonry was being organized under the first Grand Lodge, Christianity
was the only religion recognised in England. For centuries in England and Europe, it had
been the custom of the old crafts and guilds, including the masons, to have their own
patron saints on whose days festivals were held. Many ancient lodges held a festival on
June 24, the summer solstice that had been a day of heathen rejoicing, but in early
Christian times became St John the Baptist’s day. The masons also held a festival on the
winter solstice, December 27, which was another day of heathen rejoicing that became St
John the Evangelist’s day. Although other saints were held in high regard by freemasons,
including the Quatuor Coronati or Four Crowned Martyrs, nevertheless the two Saints John
were adopted as the patron saints of Freemasonry, giving rise to such old expressions as “a
St John’s Lodge” and “the St John’s Men”. In the early days of speculative freemasonry
the officers of lodges were installed every six months, usually on the festival days of the
two Saints John. Nowadays the masonic festivals are usually held annually, for example on
St George’s Day in England, on St Patrick’s Day in Ireland and on St Andrew’s Day in
Scotland.
Some authors have expressed the opinion that, prior to the Constitutions of 1723, all
masons were expected to be Christians, but it is not known whether there is any firm basis
for that opinion. There is no record of Jesus Christ being referred to in any of the Craft
rituals, but it has been suggested that some of the symbolism might have been given a
Trinitarian explanation. The records of some catechisms in the early 1700s include
references of a Christian character, more particularly in the Royal Arch. The “precious
corner-stone for a firm foundation”, from Isaiah 28:16 and the use of the tau cross as “a
sign of the righteous on the foreheads of the Lord’s people”, from Ezekiel 9:4, have also
been questioned because of their later Christian connotations. Even the pentalpha, a
magical sign used in ancient times as a talisman against the danger of fire and adopted in
freemasonry as an emblem of the five points of fellowship among other things, was
questioned because it became a Christian symbol alluding to the five wounds of Christ.
Fortunately these and other symbols of ancient origin, like the triple tau, survived the “de-
Christianising of the Craft”. From the early 1720s the Jewish membership of lodges
steadily increased, after which any Christian overtones that might have appeared in the
craft rituals were progressively eliminated. These superficial changes reflected a desire for
freemasonry to be open to all men believing in God irrespective of their creed. The Duke
of Sussex who was a Hebrew scholar, a member of Jewish learned societies and also a
supporter of Christian Emancipation, resolutely fostered Jewish membership.
Page 26 of 103
The Templar Influence

There is strong evidence of an association between the Knights Templar and freemasonry
in Scotland, especially in relation to the Mark and the Royal Arch. Extensive studies
carried out on this and related subjects in the 1980s and 1990s are described and
commented on by the investigators in two excellent books. Of these the earlier book is The
Temple and the Lodge by Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh and the other is The Hiram
Key already mentioned in relation to the Hiramic legend. The association between the
Knights Templar and freemasonry will be summarised briefly for reference. The Poor
Soldiers of Christ and the Temple of Solomon, which were established in France in 1118
or earlier, became known as the Knights Templar. An occurrence that is significant in the
history of the Knights Templar is the fact that their first Grand Master, Hugues de Payen,
was married to Catherine de St Clair. She was a Scottish woman of Norman descent, who
set up the first Templar preceptory outside the Holy Land on her family’s property, a few
kilometres south of Edinburgh. This was the Preceptory of Balantrodoch, in the village
now called Temple, not far from where Rosslyn Chapel was built later.
When Hugues de Payens first went to Jerusalem with eight other knights, it was ostensibly
to protect Christian pilgrims on their journeys in the Holy Land. The French historian
Gaetan Delaforge made a special study of the Knights Templar. He states in his book, The
Templar Tradition in the Age of Aquarius, that their real task was to obtain relics and
manuscripts containing the secret traditions of Judaism and ancient Egypt. Hugues de
Payen persuaded King Baldwin I to give him a section of the royal palace, in the area of
the Temple at Jerusalem, which he used as his headquarters. The nine knights apparently
spent their first nine years on this project and carried out extensive excavations under the
Temple, but no record of the results is known to be in existence. Lieutenant Charles
Wilson in 1895 led a contingent of Royal Engineers from Britain to explore and map the
passages and chambers under the ruins of the Temple. Lieutenant Wilson states in his
book, The Excavation of Jerusalem, that many discarded relics of the Templars were found
underground and that many of the passages and chambers were vaulted with keystone
arches. The official reports of modern Israeli archaeological investigations also support the
proposition that the knights were searching the Temple ruins for something special.
The Knights Templar included many operative freemasons and also engaged locals to work
with them constructing a wide range of castles, hospitals and ecclesiastical buildings in the
Holy Land over about 150 years. The Templar freemasons must have acquired a sound
knowledge of the customs and traditions of the local freemasons, whose direct lineage
extended back through the Phoenicians to the Sumerians and the Egyptians, which might
account for the Egyptian derivation of the substitute words suggested by Knight and
Lomas. The Templar castle constructed in about 1217 at Athlit was their last great
stronghold to be abandoned when al-Ashraf, with an army of a quarter of a million men,
finally defeated the Knights Templar in 1291. The cemetery at Athlit contains two of the
oldest known masonic graves, with well preserved headstones each having a large Templar
cross carved vertically in the centre, between a kevel on the left and the gallows square of a
Master Mason on the right. When Philippe IV, King of France, ordered all Templars to be
seized in October 1307, the large Templar fleet escaped, reputedly around Ireland to Argyll
Page 27 of 103
in Scotland, where there are many Templar relics. After intensive interrogation, torture and
trial by the Inquisition, the Grand Master Jacques de Molay was roasted to death over a
slow fire in March 1314.
Meanwhile many of the Knights Templar had escaped to Scotland and are reported to have
provided the force of horsemen that swung the battle in favour of Robert Bruce at
Bannockburn on 24 June 1314. Robert Bruce died in 1329 and in accordance with his
dying wish, Sir James Douglas, Sir William St Clair, Sir William Keith and two other
knights set out with Bruce’s heart in a silver casket to be buried in the Holy Land. All
except Sir William Keith died in Spain when supporting King Alfonso XI in his campaign
against the Moors at Granada, but Sir William Keith, whose arm was broken in battle,
brought the casket back to Scotland. Bruce’s heart was buried under the east window of the
chancel in Melrose Abbey. This close association that the Lairds of Roslin had with the
Knights Templar and masonic tradition culminated in the decision made by a later Sir
William St Clair to build a large collegiate church. Although the foundations were laid in
1446 and Rosslyn Chapel was completed in the 1480s, the main church was never built.
The chapel is a remarkable structure, having a foundation plan similar to the temple at
Jerusalem and external rows of spires that appear to have been modelled on the drawing of
the “Heavenly Jerusalem” by Lambert of St Omer who died about 1121.
Rosslyn Chapel incorporates two highly ornamented pillars representing Jachin and Boaz
and it is ornately decorated inside with Celtic, Templar and masonic symbols. The
embellishments include a wounded head relevant to the Hiramic legend, a Latin inscription
quoting part of Zerubbabel’s discourse when he sought Cyrus’s support during the
rebuilding of the temple and symbols of significance in the Royal Arch. Rosslyn Chapel
also has a scroll shrine in the form of a vault sealed under a metre of rock, the contents of
which are unknown, but which Knight and Lomas believe may contain relics from the
vaults under the Temple at Jerusalem. A remarkable feature of the interior decorations are
the accurate representations of maize and aloe plants from the New World that must have
been carved into the columns and arches around 1470, although Columbus’s first landing
on the mainland was not until 1498. This gives weight to the belief that, after its arrival in
Scotland, the Templar fleet sailed west in search of the land that is called Merica in the
Nasorean scrolls and marked by a star. It seems that the Templars almost certainly landed
on the New England coast of America early in 1308 and after settling there journeyed back
to Scotland more than once. This contention is supported by the famous image of a
fourteenth century knight carved on a rock at Westford in Massachussets and also by the
stone tower at Newport in Rhode Island, constructed like a round Templar church, that was
referred to as an existing “Norman Villa” by the Italian navigator Giovanni de Verrazano,
who was thought to be the first European to discover that part of the coastline.
Other Influences On Freemasonry

Several other organisations and ethical systems have been put forward from time to time as
the progenitors of freemasonry. It is unlikely that any of them could have been the direct
ancestor of modern speculative freemasonry, although several probably influenced the
Page 28 of 103
course of freemasonry directly or indirectly. Among the more tenuous possible

associations are the Druids and the Culdees whose influence, if any, would have been
similar to that of the Rosicrucians mentioned earlier. As the ancient Celtic priests of
Germany, Gaul and Britain, the Druids, are not known to have had any association with
operative freemasonry, their supposed direct influence is conjectural. Nor do we do not
know what contact the Culdees, a fraternity of monks who lived in isolation in groups of
cells in Scotland from the 700s, had with operative freemasonry, but their influence was
more tangible, because they lived in sturdy and well constructed stone buildings. The
Mithraic cult was devoted to the ancient Persian light-god, whose worship became popular
in the Roman Empire. As the Persians and Babylonians were pre-eminent among the
ancient builders, whence there was a continuous line of descent over several thousand
years through the Canaanites and Phoenicians to the Roman builders in the eastern
Mediterranean, it is reasonable to assume that the Mithraic cult influenced the development
of ancient esoteric freemasonry. The systems of morality taught for several thousand years
through the symbolism and elaborate rituals of the ancient Mysteries of Egypt and Greece,
also must have influenced ancient freemasonry. The Essenes, who were closely connected
to the Pythagoreans, probably had a greater influence. Menahem, a Diaspora Essene,
founded the Magians whose name reflects their Babylonian culture. They shared the
traditions of the Palestine Essenes, but did not enforce seclusion nor have the same strict
views on morality.
The Jewish historian, Flavius Josephus (c.37-100), records in War that Menahem told the
young Herod he would become king, so that Herod held him and all Essenes in honour and
trusted them throughout his reign. The Diaspora Essenes supported restitution of the
Davidic rule, but they could accept another king with the David in a subordinate role. This
was more acceptable to Herod than the proposals for the priesthood set out in the Temple
Scroll prepared by the Palestine Essenes when Herod announced around 21 BCE that he
would rebuild the temple. The decision of Herod to train 1,000 priests as masons probably
was in deference to Menahem’s influence. The preparation and obligation of candidates at
Qumran and the degrees and allegorical instruction that they received, are detailed in the
Manual of Discipline, the scroll called Community Rule. They are closely mirrored in
freemasonry.
Socio-religious craft clubs called the Collegia flourished at the height of the Roman
Empire and probably accompanied the Roman armies and their masons to Britain. During
the reign of Emperor Henry III (1039-56), a Pope is said to have issued a diploma to an
Italian group, the Travelling Architects, to build churches all over Europe. In Italy the
Comacine Masters and in Germany the Steinmetzen, or stonecutters, also are supposed to
have been established by Papal Bulls, although none of the relevant documents has been
found. The stonemasons of France received their code and privileges from Charles Martel
in 1260 and he appears in the Ancient Charges used in England, which suggests a positive
connection. This is supported by the code of masons issued in France in 1407 and also
used by the later Compagnonnage of journeyman masons, which are very similar to their
English counterparts.
Page 29 of 103
Retrospect
The foregoing historical outline traces the continuing and unbroken line of support that
operative freemasonry has provided to religious establishments down through the ages,
from ancient Egypt and the Near East, thence into the Classical Era of the eastern
Mediterranean and culminating in the great period of cathedral building in Europe and
Britain. From this outline it is quite evident that operative masonry has played a key role in
the support of religion for almost 12,000 years. Whilst these regions and periods of
Masonic activity were chosen to illustrate the direct and vital contributions made by
operative freemasonry to the religious establishments, it should not be assumed that they
provide the only connection. Indeed the input of operative freemasonry to religion can be
demonstrated in all ages and in all places in the world when and where some form of
civilization has been established. For example, consider also the remarkable stone circles
and burial sites of ancient Britain, most of them as old as the pyramids of Egypt; the
diversity and splendour of Hindu temples in India, South East Asia and Indonesia; the
Incan temples in South America; and the Mayan temples in Central America. All of these
works illustrate a similar dedication of operative freemasons in support of religious ideals.
Relevant aspects of this extended spectrum of influence are discussed in other chapters.
Reverting to the present theme, it can be seen that in every age operative freemasons have
utilised the experience gained in previous ages, built on that experience and passed their
extended knowledge on to their successors. The intimate association that operative
freemasons had with the priesthoods from ancient times until the Classical era, then with
the ecclesiastical fraternity throughout the Medieval and Renaissance periods, had a
powerful influence on the freemasons’ lives, moulding their beliefs and instilling in them
what now constitute the true principles of freemasonry. An inevitable consequence of this
continuing process is the development of a system of moral teaching and its associated
rituals, which are now used in speculative craft freemasonry. They would have been
acquired progressively, developed further in successive ages and passed on to succeeding
generations, even as language itself has evolved through successive eras.
A comprehensive outline of the evolution of freemasonry, which illustrates its close

relationship with the ancient mysteries and also with modern religions, is given by John
Yarker in The Arcane Schools - A Review of their Origin and Antiquity, with a General
History of Freemasonry and its Relation to the Theosophic, Scientific and Philosophic
Mysteries, which was published by William Tate of Belfast in 1909. A modern book of
interest that complements many of the features covered in The Arcane Schools, is one by
Don Bradley entitled Freemasonry in the Twenty-first Century. It sets out to give a sincere
inquirer a more comprehensive understanding of the teachings that are hidden in
freemasonry and is well worth reading.
Page 30 of 103
CHAPTER THREE - THE LEGACY OF

OPERATIVE FREEMASONRY
As civilisation developed freemasonry became involved in the erection of tombs, shrines,
temples and other structures for religious purposes, reflecting mankind’s growing
spirituality.
Origins
The seeds of freemasonry were sown when our primeval ancestors took their first faltering
steps on their path to civilisation. Freemasonry began as an entirely practical enterprise, to
satisfy the wants of day to day living. As civilisation developed freemasonry became
involved in the erection of tombs, shrines, temples and other structures for religious
purposes, reflecting mankind’s growing spirituality. Over the centuries, such an intimate
association with moral and spiritual influences naturally developed the speculative aspects
of freemasonry concurrently with the operative art. By medieval times, the moral teachings
of speculative freemasonry were well established and had become a significant part of the
ceremonial activities in operative lodges. It is generally accepted that speculative
freemasonry, as we know it today, owes its origin to operative masonry, although there are
few written records of the early stages of the transition. In fact, the ways in which
operative masonry came to be superseded by speculative freemasonry were not the same in
all places.
As those who established the first speculative lodges did not record their reasons for doing
so, we can only surmise that they valued the esoteric teachings of the operative lodges.
However, we know that Drs James Anderson and John Desaguliers, who were influential
Presbyterian clergymen and members of the Royal Society, were leaders in the
reorganisation of the early lodges that culminated in the establishment of the first Grand
Lodge. Both fervently believed that speculative freemasonry should be part of the
emerging philosophy of Enlightenment and that it should provide an intellectual forum
where advances in the liberal arts and sciences could be freely discussed and fostered. This
undoubtedly should still be freemasonry’s prime objective.
In England, the medieval operative lodges were virtually defunct in the first half of the
1600s, because of the Reformation. Nevertheless a few brave stalwarts kept the speculative
aspects of freemasonry alive, but hidden from public knowledge. A few operative lodges
were reassembled later for particular projects, but purely speculative lodges seem to have
emerged independently only a few decades before four old lodges met in London in 1716
and formed the first Grand Lodge, which is often referred to as the Premier Grand Lodge.
This established England as the home of speculative freemasonry. In Scotland, where
operative masonry continued to function into the second half of the eighteenth century, the
situation was quite different. Operative lodges in Scotland generally were small and often
Page 31 of 103
were family concerns. When there was a lull in the work, or work ceased to be available,
many though not all operative lodges continued to function socially and often became
speculative lodges. Operative masonry was active in Ireland until at least 1700, but there is
no evidence of any operative lodges becoming speculative lodges as they did in Scotland.
Masonry Through The Ages

To appreciate how operative lodges developed their speculative aspects and thus provided
a system from which speculative lodges could develop, some understanding of the origins
of freemasonry, its functions and the scope of its activities is desirable. The birth of the
operative art occurred towards the end of the Old Stone Age, when the Early Hunters
began to move out of their caves and learnt to construct huts from locally available
materials. About 35,000 years ago at the height of the last Ice Age, the Advanced Hunters
were the originators of representational art in the form of figurines and carvings. They also
developed painting about 15,000 years ago and were the unlikely progenitors of
architecture and masonry about 12,000 years ago, when the first known builders used stone
to construct circular huts with stone footings in Palestine, Syria and Mesopotamia. These
humble beginnings of civilisation heralded in the Agricultural Revolution that the Late
Hunters started in the New Stone Age.
The gradual development of settlements in Mesopotamia, Greece, Crete and Cyprus

provided the impetus for the first production of mud bricks and the use of stone for
perimeter walls and dykes, which were used in the construction of Jericho about 8000
BCE. By about 6500 BCE freemasonry had developed sufficiently for the circular beehive
houses in Cyprus to be constructed with stone foundations and walls that supported
corbelled domes of mud brick. About the same time in Turkey, construction of the town of
Çatal Hüyük began. It was occupied continuously until about 5500 BCE and had a peak
population of about 8,000 people. Çatal Hüyük ushered in a continuous and intimate
association of freemasonry with religion that lasted for almost 8,000 years and is the site of
the earliest religious buildings now known to be in existence. The earliest period of temple
and monumental masonry began in Mesopotamia during the Copper Age, when
progressively larger and more complex temples were erected. The temples of that period
are typified by a continuous series discovered at Eridu in Sumer, dating from about 5500
BCE to 3000 BCE. During the same period masonry in Egypt is typified by the chambered
mastaba tombs constructed for royal burials.
A period of massive monumental masonry followed, typified by the huge ziggurat of Ur-
Nammu in Mesopotamia and the three great pyramids of Giza in Egypt, dating from about
3000 BCE to 2500 BCE. Massive temple building continued in Egypt and is represented
by the complexes of Karnak and Luxor constructed in Thebes between 1500 BCE and
1300 BCE and Abu Simbel completed in about 1200 BCE. Masonry carried out in this
magnitude required huge gangs of skilled workers who were trained, organised and
supervised by master masons of great experience. The Biblical description of the
construction of the temple at Jerusalem by King Solomon, completed in about 950 BCE,
provides ample evidence of the work force and skills required for such structures in those
Page 32 of 103
days. The classical masonry of Greece that commenced in about 500 BCE and of Rome
that commenced in about 150 BCE, required similar work forces and skills. Then followed
an incredible period of cathedral building in Europe and Britain, commencing in about 500
CE and continuing for almost 1,200 years, during which time innumerable religious
structures were built.
Such “ecclesiastical” masonry was not confined to these regions, but spread from the
Levant throughout Asia, producing a vast array of religious complexes and structures of
monumental proportions, of which a few examples will be mentioned. The intricate though
massive temple of Borubudur in Java, constructed in about 800, is the largest individual
religious monument in South-East Asia. The temple-city complex of Ankor in Cambodia,
constructed in about 1000, is awe-inspiring and occupies an area of almost 200 square
kilometres. The breathtaking Taj Mahal in India, constructed of pure white marble in about
1650, undoubtedly is one of the most beautiful buildings in the world, which reputedly was
“designed to breathe an image of Paradise on earth”. Nor should we overlook the
remarkable structures in Central and South America. A prime example is the
overwhelming city-temple complex at Tikal in Gautemala, constructed by the Mayans in
about 500 CE. The citadel and city-temple complex of Machu Picchu, constructed by the
Incas in the Andes Mountains in about 1450, at an elevation of almost 3,000 metres, also is
well known. Such an incredible array of ecclesiastical buildings that have been erected in
so many places around the world during the last 8,000 years, clearly show the universality
of freemasonry and how intimately it is integrated with religious activities.
The Freemason And His Lodge

There are differing opinions as to the origin of the word freemason. The first known use of
the word freemason in England dates from 1376, when it specifically implied an operative
freemason of a superior class. However, it is quite possible that when the word was first
used in different places, the reasons for its use and its interpretations could have been
different. Some of the various explanations are worth mentioning. Bearing in mind the
close association that England had with France during medieval times when the French
language was in common use, the suggestion that the word is a corrupt pronunciation of
the French frerè maçon, meaning brother mason, ought not to be dismissed lightly.
Another suggestion is that it is a derivative of the more general freeman that was used in
the late Middle Ages to distinguish those having personal liberty from serfs, slaves or
others who were subject to the restrictions then prevalent. Stonemasons specialising in the
use of freestone to carve and sculpt decorative masonry for the vaulting, tracery, columns
and capitals in English cathedrals originally were called “masons of free stone”, then
freestone masons which later was abbreviated to freemasons. Another usage is recorded in
Scotland, dating from about 1600, when the minutes of the Lodge of Edinburgh state that
the “Freedom of the Burgh” had been accorded to its frie mesones, which gave them the
right to practice their craft. In the Burgh records of 1725 the same lodge is also referred to
as “the Society of Free Masons”, when their right to practice was confirmed.
Page 33 of 103
Operative freemasons held their meetings in their stoneyards or in suitable buildings on the
worksite. In operative practice the lodge originally was the place of work, especially in the
stone yards. The word is derived from the Old French loge meaning an arbour, later
adopted into Middle English meaning a stall as in a modern theatre. The earliest known
reference to a lodge as a building occurs in the building accounts of Vale Royal Abbey in
1277, when logias and mansiones were erected for the workers, because the site of the
abbey was some distance from habitation. Logias derives from Old French and mansiones
from Middle Latin, which respectively signify to lodge and a household, reflecting the use
of French and Latin in England in those days. There are many references to lodges in later
operative documents, including one from York in 1399, which clearly indicates that the
lodge also served as a repository for tools and implements. The body of masons
comprising an operative work force may also have been called a lodge in medieval times,
but there is no known record of that usage dating from then. The earliest recorded uses of
lodge to indicate a body of masons are from operative practice in Scotland. They occur in
the minutes of Aitchison’s Haven Lodge in 1598 and the Schaw Statutes of 1598 and 1599
refer to the Lodges of Edinburgh, Kilwinning and Stirling. Thereafter in Scotland it was
common practice to refer to a body of freemasons as a lodge.
English Operative Lodges

In England, a majority of the operative lodges worked under the immediate control of a
religious establishment such as a cathedral, often for periods extending over several
generations of their work forces. However, they also came under the guardianship of craft
guilds, originally in the form of religious fraternities, which were organised to protect the
interests of skilled workers in the various trades. These guilds were well established in
England in the reign of Henry I, in about 1153. The London Company was formed as a
stonemasons’ guild in about 1356 and probably is the best known. Its original constitution
is recorded in the Regius MS and dates from about 1390. It is the earliest written record of
such guilds in England. The guilds continued to operate very successfully until the
Reformation of 1530-1560, even though the statutes of 1360 and 1425 forbade the
organisation of masons, apparently to limit the escalation of wages when labour was short.
Although it did not become common practice until almost a century later, apprentices in
masonry were bonded under indentures to their masters from about 1230, when the earliest
known London regulation was issued.
In the final year of his reign, Henry VIII proclaimed and enforced the Act of 1547, which
disendowed all religious fraternities. His son and successor, Edward VI, confiscated any
remaining guild funds. The available records indicate that, of all the fraternities in England,
the stonemasons probably suffered the worst under this process of disendowment. The
fragmented guilds that survived the Reformation became Livery Companies, some of
which still exist in the City of London. Among the best known is the old London
Company, which Prior to the Act of 1547 was known as “The Worshipful Company of
Ffree Masons of the City of London” and also as “The Fellowship of Masons”. It was
kept alive through the Reformation, carefully hidden from official eyes and jealously
guarding its medieval craft doctrines and secrets. Although the Company’s books and
Page 34 of 103
documents prior to 1620 have been lost, the letter-books and other records of the City of
London confirm the Company’s continuity through to 1655, when it changed its title to
“The Company of Masons”. The records show that its membership has included several
women, one of whom was apprenticed as late as 1713 for the usual term of seven years.
Scottish Operative Lodges

Operative lodges came into existence in Scotland in much the same way as in England, but
in Scotland there were many more lodges though usually much smaller. There is no record
of Scottish operative lodges having a traditional history like the English lodges, but they
had the “Mason Word” which they guarded jealously. The organisation of operative
lodges in Scotland differed from that of the English lodges, especially in the formative
years of the trade. In Scotland the lodges usually worked independently, because the
buildings generally were smaller and more dispersed than in England and travel was
difficult and time consuming. Although the mason trade in Scotland originally revolved
around individual lodges, the many territorial lodges were gradually organised under the
supervision of head lodges, which were not always located in large towns. This system
prevailed until the Wars of Independence disrupted Scotland from 1286 to 1371, which
caused extreme poverty and forced the Mason Guilds to amalgamate with the organisations
of other crafts, but without destroying their continuity.
After the Wars of Independence and despite the continuing efforts of Parliament to
suppress all travelling bands of craftsmen, the lodges of freemasons in Scotland gradually
rebuilt their own organisation, which gained in power as Merchant Guilds declined. In
1475 the Masons and Wrights of Edinburgh were strong enough to obtain a “Charter of
Incorporation of Freemen-Masons and Wrights of Edinburgh” from the Burgh, called
the Seal of Cause, when Trade Regulations also were drawn up. Despite the disruptions of
the Reformation, operative freemasonry in Scotland continued to be active and actually
gained in strength, culminating with the drafting of the Schaw Statutes drawn up in 1598
and revised in 1599 by William Schaw, who had been appointed Master of Work and
General Warden of the Masons by James VI in 1583. The Schaw Statutes provided an
elaborate code of organisation and procedure within a regional structure. By the end of the
seventeenth century at least six Seals of Cause had been granted in various localities.
Irish Operative Lodges

Although there is ample visible evidence that stonemasons must have begun working in
Ireland at about the same time as they did in England and Scotland, it is Cormac’s Chapel
at Cashel, which was built by a Munster king in 1130 and is the first positive connection
with Irish operative masonry. The Chancel Arch at St Mary’s Cathedral in Tuam, which
was built in 1152, is another fine example of the skill of early Irish operative masons. The
first evidence of guild activity in Ireland is the Charter granted in 1508 to the Dublin
Masons, in company with the Carpenters, Millers and Heliers (Tilers). As in Scotland,
Page 35 of 103
there is no evidence that Irish operative lodges had a traditional history like that of their
English counterparts, but there is ample evidence that they were using their working tools
as symbols for moral instruction early in the sixteenth century.
Early “Non-Operative” Masons

As long ago as during the 1500s many Scots lodges welcomed local lairds or landowners
as honorary members. The Dublin Guild, chartered in 1508, also accepted people who
were neither operative masons nor craftsmen in any other trade. Some time prior to 1600
the Lodge of Edinburgh, which was meeting in Mary’s Chapel at Holyrood House,
admitted a gentleman named John Boswell, the Laird of Auchinleck. He was an ancestor of
James Boswell, another famous mason who was Depute Grand Master of Scotland from
1776 to 1778 and the biographer of Dr. Johnson. The same lodge, then meeting near
Newcastle in 1641, admitted as a member the Right Honourable Robert Murray, General
Quartermaster of the Scots army and later Secretary of Scotland, who was buried in
Westminster Abbey in 1673 under the title of Sir Robert Moray. This is the earliest known
record of an initiation of a speculative freemason on English soil.
Murray’s initiation preceded by five years the initiation of first known English speculative
freemason, Elias Ashmole, who in 1646 was admitted into a lodge at Warrington, in
Lancashire. Research has identified the members of the Warrington lodge as men of good
social position, but not one of them was an operative mason, nor is anything known of the
dates and places of their admissions into freemasonry. This lack of information is common
in the minutes of early English speculative lodges and is one of the reasons for the
uncertainty regarding their origins and activities, but it also means that some of the lodges
might have been in existence longer than is generally assumed. This lack of records
probably was not through laxity, but to avoid persecution during the political and religious
disruptions that had plagued England since the Reformation. From 1663 onwards, the
records of The Company of Masons in London give details of the admission of several
“non-operative” members.
Early Speculative Lodges

A speculative lodge of unknown origin at Warrington has already been mentioned. Four
old lodges met at the Centre of Union and Harmony in London in 1716 to form the first
Grand Lodge of England, the Premier Grand Lodge. Anthony Sayer was elected as its first
Grand Master of Masons on 24 June 1717. Those four lodges were all speculative,
although the lodge referred to as the “Original No 1”, which met at the Goose and
Gridiron tavern, appears to have been composed primarily of operative stonemasons.
Members of an operative lodge, formed to rebuild the medieval St Paul’s Cathedral,
probably established the “Original No 1”. Rebuilding of St Paul’s Cathedral was begun in
1675, about nine years after it was destroyed in the disastrous Great Fire of London. The
earliest known reference to an Irish speculative lodge is a witty passage in John Jones’
Page 36 of 103
opening address, the “commencements harrangue”, given in 1688 at Trinity College in

Dublin, which had been overrun by operative masons for several years erecting new
buildings. Six “Lodges of Gentlemen Freemasons” were represented when the Grand
Lodge of Ireland was formed in 1725. It is the second oldest in the world and two of those
six lodges are still in existence.
In contrast to England and Ireland, most Scottish operative lodges continued into the
1750s, some even longer. Many of them seem to have transformed into speculative lodges
almost as a matter of course. The strong and continuing influence of the regional operative
structure in Scotland probably helped to delay the formation of the Grand Lodge of
Scotland until 1736. At least two of the lodges that amalgamated to form the Grand Lodge
originally were operative lodges and are still active. They are the Lodges of Edinburgh
(Mary’s Chapel) and of Canongate Kilwinning. Several speculative lodges that joined the
new Grand Lodge soon after its formation, including Glasgow and Kilwinning, also have
records proving their continuity from operative lodges. Lodge Kilwinning, known as
“Mother Kilwinning”, takes its name from the Abbey of Kilwinning (the church of
Wynin), which is about 35 kilometres south-west of Glasgow. The Abbey was founded in
about 1150 on the site of a church built in the sixth century by an Irish monk, St Wynin. It
originally was of considerable magnificence, but was substantially destroyed in 1561. A
lodge of Kilwinning is reputed to have existed continuously since the fifteenth century.
The “Mason Word”

Although the ceremonial in the earliest operative lodges may not have been elaborate, there
is every reason to believe that the Mason Word was well established in Scotland by 1550.
When the Mason Word was conferred upon a candidate it probably was accompanied by
the bestowal of a mark, although the exact method of communication is not known.
Nevertheless, it is clear from various old catechisms that the word was conferred with
some form of ceremony similar to that of a present-day speculative Master Mason. A fairly
comprehensive explanation is given in the Edinburgh Register House MS, believed to
date from 1696. There were several variations of the word, very similar to those in use
today. Having regard to the lack of literacy in those days, it is remarkable that the words
are recognizable. The earliest published reference is in Henry Adamson’s The Muses
Threnodie, printed in Edinburgh in 1638. It says: “For we are brethren of the Rosie
Cross; we have the Mason Word . . .”. The minutes of Aitchison’s Haven Lodge in 1598
include one of the earliest references to the instruction of Fellows of the Craft in the
Mason Word, as well as to the instruction of prentices by Entered Apprentices.
Ceremonial
A great deal of modern speculative ceremonial is derived from practices in the operative
lodges. This includes preparation of the candidate, entrance of the candidate into the lodge
room, perambulation within the lodge room and the use of working tools and tracing
Page 37 of 103
boards. None of these is identical with its operative predecessor, but sufficiently similar as
to leave no doubt as to its origin. In Scotland an apprentice completed seven years
(sometimes a longer or shorter period) under indenture, after which he was “entered” in
the books of the lodge and became an Entered Apprentice. He was then allowed to do a
certain amount of work on his own account, although not allowed to employ subordinate
labour. After another seven years or so in the craft he could become a Fellow of the Craft,
when he could undertake contracts as an employer. This system was a feature of operative
free masonry in Scotland at least as early as 1598 and it has been established beyond doubt
that by then admission to the grades of Entered Apprentice and Fellow of the Craft was of
an esoteric nature. In English lodges the titles of Entered Apprentice and Fellowcraft were
not known until 1723, when they were included in the first Book of Constitutions written
by Dr James Anderson DD, a Scotsman who had been educated at Marischal College in
Aberdeen.
Preparation of the candidate in operative practice included bathing and examination by a

physician to ascertain wholeness and soundness of body. The candidate was blindfolded
and “neither naked nor clothed” when conducted into the lodge room under the restraint
of cabletows. The challenge at the door was similar to that in modern practice.
Perambulations were clockwise around the candidate’s track during the induction
ceremony, but all other movements in the lodge room were by the most direct method, as
is still the practice in Emulation lodges. The left heel slipshod comes directly from
operative practice, where it receives even greater emphasis than it does in speculative
freemasonry, because it is used as a specific reminder to the candidate of the binding
nature of his indenture. This aspect of operative practice still survives in a familiar mode of
interrogation used in Scottish freemasonry.
In Scottish lodges, until near the end of the seventeenth century, the presiding officer was
variously called a Deacon, Warden or Preses. After then he was usually given the title of
Master Mason, perpetuating the operative title of Master, which referred to the mason who
organised and took charge of the building work. The Master usually was the proprietor of
the lodge engaged as the contractor for the work. The Grand Lodge of Scotland has always
used the title of Grand Master Mason for its chief presiding office bearer. Until the end of
the seventeenth century in England, Master and Master Mason were only used in reference
to the Mason in charge of a building operation. The earliest recorded use of the title is with
reference to John of Gloucester, who was Master Mason for the erection of Westminster
Hall from 1254 to 1262. It was in this sense that the title of Master was used in the Old
Charges in the Levander-York MS, which is believed to have been written in 1560. It is
interesting to note that, when referring to the members of the lodge as distinct from its
officers, those Old Charges also distinguish between Apprentices, Brothers and Fellows,
though not as specifically as in Scottish operative practice.
In common with all ancient societies and religions, tradition plays an important role in
freemasonry. In this context tradition refers to knowledge and doctrines transmitted to
successive generations, rather than to ritualistic procedures. Masonic traditions are
primarily communicated in legends and traditional histories. Traditions, such as those
relating to the untimely death of Hiram Abif, frequently are allegorical and should be
Page 38 of 103
considered in the light of the truths they illustrate, rather than as historical fact. They
should not be rejected for the want of irrefutable evidence. Although neither the Irish nor
the Scottish operative masons had a traditional history similar to that included in the Old
Charges of the English operative masons, it is interesting to know that both used the
working tools as vehicles of moral instruction.
The lectures given to English medieval stonemasons usually included a mythological

history of the Craft, tracing it back into antiquity. Although these lectures varied
considerably from locality to locality, they usually emphasised the influence of Nimrod
and dramatised the construction of temple erected by King Solomon at Jerusalem. English
tradition also features a Great Assembly of Masons supposed to have been held at York in
926, with the approval and encouragement of King Athelstan of Northumbria. There is no
known record of King Athelstan’s influence on freemasonry, but the Venerable Bede, a
renowned Anglo-Saxon scholar, theologian and historian who was canonised in 1899,
records in his Ecclesiastical History the following event in York that is at least as
significant. The Kentish wife of Prince Edwin, a Northumbrian King, converted him to
Christianity in about 500 with the help of Bishop Paulinus. Because of this, Prince Edwin
built the first church in York for Bishop Paulinus. It became the centre of the Bishopric,
after which the whole of Northumbria became Christian. Thus began the long and
auspicious association of York with English freemasonry, which has continued unbroken
until the present day.
Whilst it is acknowledged that there is no basis in fact for the traditional continuity of
“Patriarchs” and “Grand Masters” in freemasonry from Adam and Noah until the present
day, the medieval stories should not be dismissed arbitrarily. Like all myths, they contain
elements of truth. For example, Nimrod is the first great builder referred to in the Old
Testament. He did establish a huge team of stonemasons and is recorded in Genesis as the
founder of Ninevah, which has been occupied continuously since about 5000 BCE.
Likewise the construction of the temple at Jerusalem was a stupendous task in its time and
the Biblical record of the methods and workforce used are remarkably similar to those of
the medieval cathedral builders. Investigations at the temple site in Jerusalem, from those
carried out by the Knights Templar in about 1120 to those recently carried out by Jewish
archaeologists, all support the existence of a vault under the Holy of Holies, which
traditionally is reputed to have been constructed for use by King Solomon as a secret
meeting place and also as a repository for temple treasures and valuable documents. Such
vaults were a common feature of temples from ancient times, which was continued with
the provision of crypts for cathedrals and other ecclesiastical buildings constructed in
medieval times.
The Missing Stones

The rituals used in modern speculative freemasonry included comprehensive lectures on
the working tools used by operative freemasons, but the compilers omitted some other
important elements of the ancient symbolism, especially in respect of the stones used in the
buildings. In the degrees of operative freemasonry the candidate always represented a
Page 39 of 103
particular stone, either during the course of its preparation or while it was being fixed into
position. In this context the plans and gauges used during the preparation and erection of
the stones also were of symbolic importance. The rough and perfect ashlars and the
keystone are important symbols in the speculative craft and mark degrees. The reasons
why the rough ashlar represents an apprentice and the perfect ashlar represents the more
expert craftsman are self-evident. It also is common knowledge that a specially shaped
keystone is useful as well as being a pleasing embellishment with which to complete the
construction of an arch. However, many speculative freemasons are not aware of several
other important stones and their symbolisms. Nor do they receive any explanation of the
meanings of the various plan shapes used in buildings. Some of those aspects will be
commented on briefly, to help the enquiring mason achieve a better understanding of the
important lessons intended to be conveyed by the speculative rituals.
It probably is not common knowledge that a cubical stone is rarely used in masonry
structures except to complete a course adjacent to openings. Nevertheless it was an
important stone used to test the skills of an apprentice who aspired to become a fully
qualified craftsman, when his knowledge of the various projections of a cube was also
tested. In ancient times another use of a cubical stone was as the great corner stone,
sometimes used to stabilise the corner of a building. This is the stone referred to in Isaiah
28:16 in allusion to the coming of a messiah, which is the passage quoted in I Peter 2:6-8
with reference to Christ. The more stable and commonly used method of securing the
corners of a large masonry structure is with elbow square stones. These are right angled
stones having one leg four units long and the other leg three units long, each leg being
square in cross-section with sides of one unit. It therefore is like a Pythagorean triangle
without an hypoteneuse. They are placed with the long and short legs alternating in
successive courses at the corners, with the wall stones securely fixed in between them.
These stones are a reminder that our work must be properly squared in compliance with the
plans laid down in the scriptures.
Most of the stones used in the construction of masonry walls are running stones that are
usually square in cross-section, with a length three times the sectional dimension, although
a length twice the sectional dimension may be used. The stones in alternate courses are
staggered as in brickwork, to avoid concurrent joints being formed in successive courses,
which would be detrimental to the strength of the structure. These stones remind us of the
need to work in harmony with our fellow workers and that everything we do must be
straight, level and true. The footing corner stone is another very important stone in
masonry structures. It is a tee-shaped stone having the top of the tee equal in length to two
running stones and the projecting leg the same length as the section dimension. Its
sectional dimension naturally must be the same as that of the running stones that will be
joined to it. This stone is placed in alternate courses of an external wall at the junction with
an internal wall, so that the running stones in both walls mesh with the projecting legs of
the tee. This stone reminds us that our strength is in united effort, whilst its shape, which is
that of a Tau cross, emphasises the importance of serving the Lord, because in Ezekiel 9:4
we are told that this was the mark to be placed on the foreheads of those to be saved.
Page 40 of 103
Ground Plans
In conclusion it would be appropriate to comment on the various shapes in plan that have
been used for ecclesiastical buildings. Rectangular shapes are by far the most common, but
many other regular shapes of significance have been used for special purposes. These
shapes include circular, triangular, pentagonal, hexagonal, octagonal, square, oblong
square, temple square and of course the Latin cross so frequently seen in Christian
cathedrals. Each shape has a symbolism of its own. The circle, equilateral triangle and
pentagon are discussed in some detail in one or more of the other relevant papers and
require no further comment. The Latin cross is an obvious shape for cathedrals, because of
its Christian significance in relation to the crucifixion of Christ. The hexagon is the
perimeter of six equilateral triangles abutting each other cyclically with their apices
meeting at a common point in the centre. All of the symbolisms of an equilateral triangle
apply and in addition the number six is a symbol of the accomplishment of growth or
purpose. The hexagon also is the shape of the cells of a honeycomb, which symbolises
industry and reminds us of the honey, which is a symbol of spiritual food and nourishment
and of the celestial food of wisdom and love.
The octagon is formed in a similar fashion to the hexagon and is composed of eight
isosceles triangles each with its apex angle of 45º meeting the others in the centre. The legs
of the compasses are commonly extended to an angle of 45º in masonic jewels used in
various orders of freemasonry. Eight is called the number of regeneration and is a symbol
of entrance into a new state or condition of the soul, in which sense it is an important
symbol to the Knights Templar. The square is the shape of every side of a perfect cube and
therefore is the plan view and both elevations of the Holy of Holies in the tabernacle and in
the temple of King Solomon, symbolising the need for the higher minds and intellects of
humans to be in harmony with God. The oblong square, also called a double square, was
the shape of the Holy Place in the tabernacle and in the temple. It is the usual shape
adopted for the mosaic pavement in a speculative lodge. The temple square, also called a
triple square, was the template of the tabernacle and the temple. It included the Holy of
Holies and the Holy Place, thus symbolising the progress that humans must make from a
mundane existence to the spiritual world if they are to partake in life eternal.
Page 41 of 103
CHAPTER FOUR – HISTORY, A KEY

ELEMENT IN MASONRY
In operative lodges the Traditional History and Ancient Charges were a central part of the
ceremonial and the basis of moral instruction.
Background
In operative lodges, history was a key element used to illustrate the moral teachings of
masonry. Tradition also was an essential component in the instruction of apprentices and
craftsmen at all levels of competence. Although the details differ and the English language
has changed, the charges and traditional histories of modern speculative freemasonry were
derived from the Old Constitutions of the lodges of operative freemasons working in
medieval England, from when the craft guilds were established during the reign of Henry I
in about 1153 until during the Reformation, when all lodges were prohibited by Henry
VIII’s Act of 1547 disendowing all religious fraternities. In operative lodges the Old
Constitutions, usually referred to as the Ancient Charges or the Old Charges, were a
central part of the ceremonial and the basis of moral instruction. An authentic copy of the
Old Constitutions, which included the Traditional History, the Charges of Nimrod and
the Ancient Charges, was the authority under which lodges worked. Candidates were
admonished to behave in an appropriate manner, cautioned to preserve the rights and
privileges of their craft and warned that they must not reveal their trade secrets and modes
of recognition to strangers.
No other medieval craft or religious body is known to have possessed documents similar to
the Old Constitutions. Their content and character differed greatly from the Guild
ordinances of other trades and clearly reflected the moralising influence of the
ecclesiastical environment in which most operative masons worked and lived. A
fundamental part of the Old Constitutions was the traditional history, which recounted the
development of civilisation and highlighted the important part played by masonry in the
improvement of mankind. Although some of the anecdotes were allegorical, most were
based on biblical history. The ancient charges and traditional histories were not identical in
all copies of the Old Constitutions, nor were they handed down in unvarying form, but
they did have a common theme. The standardised lectures and traditional histories that are
used in modern speculative lodges do not include all of the material that was incorporated
in the Old Constitutions.
The oldest known copy of the Old Constitutions is a document written by a priest,
comprising thirty-three vellum sheets entitled the Poem of the Craft of Masonry. It is
believed to have been based on a much older document and is called the Regius MS or the
Halliwell MS. It was discovered in 1839 and early researchers thought that it would have
been written in about 1390, but later the date was revised to about 1410. In modern
Page 42 of 103
terminology the Regius MS is classified as dating from the first quarter of the fifteenth
century. The rules and regulations set out in the Regius MS for the governance of
freemasons are arranged under fifteen Articles for ye maystur mason and a further fifteen
Points for felows and prentes. The document states that the rules and regulations were
established at a great assemblage of masons King Athelstan ordered to be held, reputedly
at York in 926, but there is no known record of the event. The Regius MS and the Cooke
MS, which was written about fifty years later, are both held in the British Museum. The
Grand Lodge No. 1 MS, held by the United Grand Lodge of England, is a later rendition
of the rules and regulations dated 1583, almost forty years after Henry VIII had prohibited
all lodges. This document, which probably was transcribed in secret to preserve the old
traditions, nevertheless brings to light a distinct transition from the tenor of earlier copies
of the Old Constitutions because it includes much that is of a purely speculative nature.
The Ancient Charges In Summary

The Ancient Charges were voluminous documents. Some of the older as well as a few of
the more recent copies are in book form, but many are written on skins and stitched end to
end to form rolls. The text is usually in three parts. The first part is a prayer invoking a
blessing, usually of the Holy Trinity, but El Shaddai and other appellations also are used
when referring to God, though mainly in obligations and charges. The second part is an
extended historical statement that usually culminates with the requirement for the
candidate to take an obligation on the Holy Book, sometimes in Latin. The final part of the
text comprises the actual Charges, which are very comprehensive and were rehearsed to
the candidate. The candidate was then required to take a vow to keep them well and truly
and to the utmost of his knowledge and ability, which he ratified by saluting the Holy
Book. As the prayer, the actual Charges and the associated obligations are not historical in
character it is not necessary to discuss them any further in the present context. Relevant
aspects of the traditional history will now be examined in relation to their historical
content, having regard to the usual context in which they were used, but without reference
to any specific copy of the Ancient Charges.
The Liberal Arts And Sciences

It is not known when the seven liberal arts and sciences were first incorporated into the
Ancient Charges, but they are an important component in nearly all of the known copies.
A discourse on the characteristics of the arts and sciences and their utilisation by the
various crafts is sometimes given in the opening statement. However it usually appears
later in the traditional history, after the legend relating to their preservation on two pillars
that together would resist the ravages of fire and water. This discourse concludes by
emphasising that, in reality, all of the arts and sciences are dependant in some way upon
measurement and therefore that they are all founded on the one science called Geometry,
which in medieval days was synonymous with masonry. References to the liberal arts and
sciences included in the rituals of the Second Degree of modern speculative freemasonry
Page 43 of 103
clearly evolved from the discourse in the Ancient Charges. As the liberal arts and sciences
were the foundation of the curricula in all institutions of advanced learning in medieval
times, their inclusion in the Ancient Charges is to be expected, confirming that the
medieval master masons were men of considerable learning and skill. Master masons
proved their ability by transforming the visions of their employers into the glorious
cathedrals and other stately edifices they designed and constructed. This knowledge,
especially geometry, was an essential part of a craftsman’s training, because measurement
is the foundation of a freemason’s work.
The Foundation Of The Crafts

The Traditional History begins with the biblical story in Genesis, which records the
Hebrew traditions concerning the origin of the crafts, which are paralleled in the legends of
other peoples and have been confirmed by archaeological investigations. The first section
is about the beginnings of history, after the creation and before the flood. It commences
with Lamech, a descendant of Adam through Cain and is taken directly from Genesis 4:19-
22, which in the New English Bible translation says:
“Lamech married two wives, one named Adah and the other Zillah. Adah
bore Jabal who was the ancestor of herdsmen who live in tents; and his
brother’s name was Jubal; he was the ancestor of those who play the harp
and pipe. Zillah, the other wife, bore Tubal-cain, the master of all
coppersmiths and blacksmiths, and Tubal-cain’s sister was Naamah.”
The biblical exposition is amplified in the traditional history by including the ancient
Hebrew tradition that Jabal, while tending his sheep in the fields, was the first man to
construct walls and later houses of stone, thus founding the craft of masonry. It also
ascribes to Naamah the founding of the craft of weaving, completing the requirements for
the rise of civilisation and urban dwelling.
Until about a century ago, chronologists calculated the Old Testament dates solely on the
recorded genealogies, which are incomplete and do not provide all of the required details.
In 1650 Archbishop James Ussher (1581-1656), an Irish prelate born in Dublin, used the
recorded genealogies to date the creation of the world and the appearance of Adam at 4004
BCE, which is the Year of Light referred to in speculative craft freemasonry. Dates in the
Anno Lucis calendar are derived by adding 4,000 years to the Common Era date. Modern
research, supported by archaeological discoveries, indicates that the earliest biblical
records relate to humanity about 10000 BCE or even earlier. Also that the flood probably
occurred before 5000 BCE, that Noah’s descendants developed into nations around 5000
BCE, that the tower of Babel was erected around 4800 BCE, followed soon after by the
first great buildings in Babylonia. As writing was invented many centuries after these
events and genealogies were based on oral tradition, such differences in dating are to be
expected. It is of particular interest to note that archaeological investigations reveal that
stone fences and footings in houses were first used in Palestine, Syria and Mesopotamia
Page 44 of 103
about 12,000 years ago, when the domestication of wild sheep and goats began, which
coincides in place and time with the story of Lamech and his children.
The Two Pillars

This section of the Traditional History is the original legend of the pillars and deals with
the preservation of the arts and sciences. The legend is not of masonic origin and bears no
relation to the two pillars erected at the entrance to King Solomon’s temple. The Greek
historian Berosus transcribed the legend in about 300 BCE, reputedly from a Sumerian
account that had been recorded in cuneiform in about 1500 BCE. Flavius Josephus, the
eminent Jewish author who lived in the first century and wrote in Greek, also included the
legend in his Antiquity of the Jews. Ranulf Higden, a monk of Chester who died in about
1364, copied the legend from Josephus when he wrote his world history, Polychronicon.
Although it is not known whether the legend was included in the Ancient Charges before
it appeared in Polychronicon, in view of freemasonry’s close ecclesiastical connections in
those days it seems most likely. The legend is no longer referred to in speculative craft
freemasonry, but it is still a part of the tradition in the Royal Ark Mariner and the Ancient
and Accepted Rite.
The tradition records that Lamech’s four children, the founders of the crafts, “knew well
that God would do vengeance for sin, either by fire or water”, thus foreseeing the flood in
Noah’s time. They therefore determined to preserve the seven liberal arts and sciences
against such a calamity by inscribing them on two pillars, one which would survive a fire
and the other which would survive a flood, although accounts of the two materials vary.
Some say marble that cannot be burnt and laternes or laterite, a stone formed from clay,
that cannot be destroyed by water. Others more logically say that brick resists fire and
either marble or brass resists water. Archaeological discoveries reveal that the smelting and
casting of copper and the open hearth firing of earthenware were being used in the area by
about 7,000 years ago and possibly earlier. Although after the probable time of the great
flood associated with the melt down near the end of the last Ice Age, this is earlier than the
indicated date of the later flood that inundated Mesopotamia and the surrounding regions,
when either method of preservation would have been possible. Tradition relates that the
knowledge thus preserved was providentially recovered after the flood by Hermes, who is
called the “father of wisdom”. He reputedly was a descendant of Noah through Shem and
applied the recovered knowledge for the benefit of mankind. The moral of this ancient
legend is that knowledge and truth must be preserved, but that corruption will be punished.
An apparent problem with this tradition is that the oldest cuneiform inscriptions presently
known date from about 5,200 years ago and hieroglyphs from about a century earlier,
which is after the likely dates of both floods. However some pre-flood inscriptions have
been discovered, including a pictographic tablet found by Dr Langdon under the flood
deposit at Kish, seals found by Dr Schmidt under the flood layer at Fara and pre-flood
seals found by Dr Woolley at Ur. One of the ancient Babylonian kings, Hammurapi who
promulgated the famous code of laws in about 1750 BCE, recorded that “he loved to read
the writings of the age before the flood”. The reference appears to relate to the
Page 45 of 103
Mesopotamian inundation, not the earlier great flood associated with the Ice Age.
Hammurapi was a contemporary of Abraham and he is usually identified with the
Amraphel referred to in Genesis 14. When Assur-ban-apli founded Nineveh’s great library
in about 600 BCE, he also made reference to the “inscriptions before the time of the
flood”. In about 300 BCE, the Greek historian Berosus recorded a tradition from the
Sumerian accounts, which said that before the flood Xisuthrus, the Babylonian equivalent
of Noah, buried the Sacred Writings at Sippar on tablets of baked clay and dug them up
afterwards. A tradition among Arabs and Jews says that Enoch invented writing and left a
number of records.
Nimrod And The Tower Of Babel

This part of the Traditional History is derived from the Hebrew traditions concerning
events that took place in the first few hundred years after the flood. It is taken from the
New English Bible translations of Genesis 10:8-13 and Genesis 11:2-9, which say:
“Cush (who was a son of Ham and a grandson of Noah) was the father of
Nimrod, who began to show himself a man of might on earth; and he was
a mighty hunter before the Lord, . . . His kingdom in the beginning
consisted of Babel, Erech and Accad, all of them in the land of Shinar.
From that land he migrated to Asshur and built Nineveh, Rehoboth-Ir,
Calah and Resen, a great city between Nineveh and Calah.”
“As men journeyed in the east, they came upon a plain in the land of
Shinar and settled there. They said to one another, ‘Come, let us make
bricks and bake them hard’; they used the bricks for stone and bitumen
for mortar. ‘Come’, they said, ‘let us build ourselves a city and a tower
with its top in the heavens and make a name for ourselves; or we shall be
dispersed all over the earth.’ . . . So the Lord dispersed them from there
all over the earth and they left off building the city. That is why it is called
Babel, because the Lord made there a babble of the language of all the
world; from that place the Lord scattered men all over the face of the
earth.”
Archaeological investigations reveal that the ziggurat called the Tower of Babel was
constructed in the manner described in Genesis. Ziggurat is derived from the Assyrio-
Babylonian word ziqquratu meaning a pinnacle or mountain top and denotes a sacred
temple tower. The traditional site of the tower is one at Borsippa, about 15 kilometres
south-west of the centre of Babylon, the ancient Babel. An inscribed cylinder found by Sir
Henry Rawlinson in a foundation corner states that a former king completed the tower to a
height of 42 cubits, but that it fell into ruins in ancient times. It further states that the
brickwork and roofing tiles were rebuilt as new at the behest of Marduk, restoring the
tower as it was in remote days. Marduk or Merodach was the Babylonian God that Nimrod
was said to be in human form. A masonic tradition says that masons were first made much
of at the building of the Tower of Babel under the directions of Nimrod, the great King of
Page 46 of 103
Babylon, who was a Master Mason. This tradition says that Nimrod loved the craft well
and made the masons Free Men and Free Masons in his kingdom. Another tradition says
that when Nimrod sent sixty lodges of masons to build Nineveh and the other cities of the
east, he gave them a Charter and the Charges of Nimrod, which reputedly are those set
out in the Ancient Charges. When an apprentice was indentured in an English operative
lodge, his obligation traditionally was called the “Oath of Nimrod”.
The Call Of Abraham

The Traditional History relates how Abraham, who was born at Ur of the Chaldees
in southern Babylonia in about 2160 BCE, responded to the Lord’s call that is
recorded in the following words in the New English Bible translation of Genesis
12:1-4:
“The Lord said to Abraham ‘Leave your own country, your kinsmen and
your father’s house and go to a country that I will show you. I will make
you into a great nation, I will bless you and make your name great . . .’
And so Abraham set out . . .”
Although he lived in a world of idolatry Abraham was not an idolater, but believed in one
God. He set out from Ur in search of the land where he could build a nation free from
idolatry. He reached the ancient caravan city of Haran 1,000 kilometres to the north-west
in about 2110 BCE, where he stayed for many years. After the death of his father Terah,
Abraham travelled south-east and reached Shechem in Canaan about 2085 BCE, where he
built an altar to God as he did later at Bethel and also at Hebron. Because of the famine in
Canaan, Abraham continued on into Egypt.
Tradition says that the patriarchs taught the seven liberal arts and sciences in Egypt, where
Euclid was a worthy scholar who subsequently was commissioned by the king to teach the
sons of royalty the science of geometry and the practice of masonry and all manner of
worthy works. This is entirely allegorical, because Euclid was not born until about 330
BCE. In fact, one of the first Greek scholars to visit and study in Egypt was Thales of
Miletus, who was born in about 630 BCE. When he returned from Egypt he was well
versed in the techniques of Egyptian geometry. The Egyptians knew from their experience
in building that a triangle with two sides of equal length also had two equal angles adjacent
to them. They also knew that a triangle with sides three, four and five units long had a right
angle opposite the long side. Thales devised a practical proof for the properties of an
isosceles triangle, but it was Pythagoras, born about sixty years after Thales, who was
credited with being the first to prove the famous theorem of a right angled triangle, that the
square of the hypotenuse equals the sum of the squares of the other two sides. However it
was Euclid who formulated the theorems, including his Forty-seventh Proposition for a
right-angled triangle, which are still used as a basis for teaching classical geometry.
Page 47 of 103
The Temple At Jerusalem

This major episode in the Traditional History could be regarded as the culminating
component, because it is a foundation for all instruction in moral precepts that were
imparted in the degrees of operative freemasonry. To appreciate this section of the
traditional history in its proper context, it would be pertinent to comment on the
ceremonials within which the degrees of operative freemasonry were conferred. They were
conducted in a specifically historical setting in which the candidate personified a “living
stone” being wrought from the rough, as prepared in the quarry, to a state of perfection fit
for erection in the most glorious of all temples, the life hereafter. In each degree in
operative freemasonry the candidate represented a particular stone in the construction of
temple at Jerusalem by King Solomon. The candidate was required symbolically to
undergo the preparation of that stone, its testing prior to use and its erection in the temple.
The degrees referred to relevant passages in the scriptures and were explained in practical
terms in relation to the work of an operative freemason. The appropriate working tools also
were introduced and their practical uses and moral interpretations were explained.
The discourse in the Traditional History is taken directly from the scriptural record of
King David’s desire to build a temple at Jerusalem, the preparations he made for its
construction and its construction by King Solomon with the assistance of Hiram King of
Tyre and Hiram Abif, the son of a widow of the Hebrew tribe of Dan and of a Tyrian
father. Hiram Abif was a man of great skill and ingenuity sent by King Hiram to execute
the principal works of the interior of the temple and the various utensils required for the
sacred services. Adoniram was the official whom King Solomon appointed to superintend
the monthly levies of ten thousand men working in relays in Lebanon. All of this is
described in some detail in I Kings chapters 5-10, I Chronicles chapters 21-22 and 28-29
and II Chronicles chapters 1-9. The following three passages recorded in the New English
Bible translations of II Chronicles 3:1, I Kings 5:17 and I Kings 6:7 are especially
relevant-
“Then Solomon began to build the house of the Lord in Jerusalem on

Mount Moriah, where the Lord had appeared to his father David, on the
site which David had prepared on the threshing floor of Onan the
Jebusite.”
“By the king’s orders they quarried huge, massive blocks for laying the
foundation of the Lord’s house in hewn stone.”
“In the building of the house, only blocks of dressed stone direct from the
quarry were used; no hammer or axe or any iron tool whatever was heard
in the house while it was being built.”
The Ancient Charges variously refer to the master of geometry and chief master of all
masons as Aynon, Agnon, Ajuon or Dyon, who is called the son of the King of Tyre, but
the context suggests that the person referred to is Hiram Abif. It seems that the word could
have been a corruption of the Hebrew word Adon which signifies Lord, so that the title
Page 48 of 103
could refer to Hiram Abif as Adon Hiram, or possibly to Adoniram with whom he is
sometimes confused, although the latter seems less likely. Another possible interpretation
is the old use of Anon or Anonym signifying one whose name is not divulged and from
which the modern anonymous is derived. Whatever the derivation of Anon, he takes on a
purely allegorical mantle after the completion of the temple at Jerusalem and is credited
with travelling to many lands with other masons to practice and teach the craft, thus
introducing masonry into Europe and Britain.
Freemasonry In France
The allegorical story of Aynon is taken up in France under about twenty-five different
variations of what most probably was intended to be the same name, among which
Naymus Graecus and Maynus Grecus possibly are the best known, although in the second
edition of the Constitutions of the premier Grand Lodge, Dr James Anderson refers to him
as Ninus. When Pythagoras established his famous school at Crotona in about 530 BCE
and later in other cities, Greece was known as Magna Graecia or Greater Greece which
included Asia Minor, southern Italy and Sicily and continued from the settlement of
Syracuse in about 750 BCE until the Punic Wars of 264-241 BCE. Pythagoras, who taught
geometry and philosophy and established a comprehensive system of symbolism to explain
his esoteric teachings, has a legendary connection with masonry which he is supposed to
have introduced into France.
It seems highly likely that Naymus Graecus and its variants were corruptions of Magna
Graecia, arising from the legendary connection between Pythagoras and masonry. In any
event, the legend says that “a curious mason named Naymus Graecus, who had been at
the making of Solomon’s Temple, came into France and there taught the craft of
masonry”. The legend then includes an anomaly similar to that of Euclid in Egypt,
asserting that a person of French royal blood, Charles Martel, had learned the craft from
Naymus Graecus and “loved it well”, establishing masonry in France with good methods
of payment. Charles Martel (688-741) was the progenitor of the Carolingian dynasty and
he was known as Charles the Hammer. Although not actually the king of France, Charles
Martel was a notable soldier and ruled France under the title “Mayor of the Palace”.
Freemasonry In England
The historian Rebold says of Charles Martel that “at the request of the Anglo-Saxon
kings, he sent workmen and masters into England”. This is the reason why medieval
operative freemasons in England regarded Charles Martel as one of their patrons and
included him in the Traditional History, which continues with an allegorical account of
the establishment of freemasonry in England and the fixing of good rates of pay. Briefly, it
says that England was pagan and had neither masonry nor the ancient charges until the
time of St Alban, when a worthy knight who was chief steward to the king constructed the
town walls. He is said to have cherished the masons for their good work, on which account
Page 49 of 103
he obtained from the king and his counsel a charter, naming the masons an Assembly. He
also gave them charges and doubled their wages, which previously had been only a penny
a day throughout the whole land. The early background to St Albans is worth recounting.
St Albans is the successor of the important Roman-British town of Verulamium, which

according to the records of the Roman historian Tacitus may have been one of the few
examples in Britain of a municipium, wherein the inhabitants had the same rights as the
citizens of Rome. The town owes its name to St Alban, a Roman soldier who was the first
Christian martyr in England, beheaded in 303 for giving refuge to St Amphibalus, the
priest who had converted him to Christianity. In about 793 Offa, the king of Mercia,
founded a Benedictine abbey in honour of St Alban. It rose to such great power and wealth
that its head was the premier abbot in England from 1154 to 1396. Another
contemporaneous legend says that Gordianus, who was emperor from 244 BCE to 238
BCE, sent many architects into England where they constituted many lodges and instructed
the craftsmen in the true principles of freemasonry. It also says that a few years later, when
Carausius was emperor in Britain, from 293 BCE to 287 BCE, he loved the craft and
appointed Albanus as Grand Master of Masons, who employed the fraternity in building
the palace of Verulamium. Despite the obvious discrepancies in the dates, it is a fact that
architecture and the craft of freemasonry were first encouraged in England during the third
century and that the earliest freemasons came from Europe.
In the light of the early history of St Albans, it is not surprising that its establishment
features in the traditional story of the origins of operative masonry in England. Some
researchers are of the opinion that the increase in wages attributed to the time of St Alban
was the increase that came into effect after the period of the Black Death, the bubonic
plague that swept through Asia and Europe and reached England in 1348. Because of the
unprecedented demand for labour in the aftermath of the Black Death, a Statute of
Labourers was enacted in 1350 to regulate wages and prevent extortionate pricing. The
wages of a master freestone mason were then fixed at four pence per day and of other
masons at three pence per day, which are much higher than those referred to in the
traditional history, strongly suggesting that there were two different events, of which the
one in the traditional history occurred much earlier. Some have expressed the opinion that
the Statute establishes that the traditional history is a product of the period shortly after the
Black Death, but it seems most unlikely to have been compiled at a time of such
misfortune and labour shortage. In any event, it almost certainly is a collection of oral
traditions that had evolved over a very long period.
The Traditional History concludes with the legend of an Assembly held at York in 926
during the reign of King Athelstan, whose half-brother Edwin, who is often called his son,
had learnt geometry and the mason’s craft, then prevailed upon the king to issue a Charter
for the masons and a Commission to hold an annual Assembly. No record of the Assembly
has been found, but a tradition handed down for many centuries usually has a basis in fact.
In any event, the continuing association of York with masonry began with the conversion
to Christianity of the Northumbrian king, Prince Edwin, by his Kentish wife. He was
baptised on Easter Day 627 by the first Bishop of York, Paulinus, in a wooden chapel on
the site of the present Minster. The Venerable Bede, a renowned historian who lived in the
Page 50 of 103
Jarrow monastery on Tyneside from 682 until his death in 735, records in his
Ecclesiastical History that Edwin replaced the chapel with a stone church which became
the centre of the Bishopric. When burnt down in about 741, the chapel was replaced by a
magnificent stone church that was ruined in about 1080, following the Norman Conquest,
but it was progressively rebuilt until the York Minster was erected between 1220 and 1474.
Freemasonry In Scotland
Operative lodges in Scotland did not have the allegorical story of the masons in France,
nor did they have the traditional history of the masons in England, but the tradition of the
Mason Word was well established in medieval times. Possession of the Mason Word and a
knowledge of the local catechisms and modes of recognition enabled an itinerant mason to
prove himself and obtain work appropriate to his skills. In Scotland operative lodges came
under the jurisdiction of a Statute in 1424, almost a century before any similar organisation
was instituted in England. Then in 1475 the first Seal of Cause, or Charter of
Incorporation, was granted to the Masons and Wrights of Edinburgh by the Burgh. The
organisation of Scottish operative lodges culminated in 1598 with the promulgation of the
Schaw Statutes which established an elaborate code of organisation and procedure. The
Hiramic legend and also a form of the five points of fellowship are known to have been in
use in Scottish lodges in the late 1500s, by which time Masons’ Marks were already being
registered. There was no Scottish counterpart of the English Ancient Charges, but there
are records of at least some Scottish lodges having had copies at the beginning of the 1600s
if not earlier, probably obtained by the Scottish lodges working in northern England in
those times.
Freemasonry In Ireland
The operative lodges in Ireland did not have an equivalent of the English Ancient Charges,
nor is there any evidence of a tradition like the Mason Word as it was used in Scotland.
However it is known that in Ireland the working tools of an operative mason were being
used symbolically for moral instruction early in the 1500s, when the guild system was
flourishing. In 1508 the earliest Charter known to be in existence was issued to the Dublin
Masons operating in association with the Carpenters, Millers and Heliers (Tilers). Another
well known feature of operative masonry in Ireland was the Freemason’s Stone, a
landmark in the Coombe District of Dublin from 1602 until at least 1818.
Page 51 of 103
CHAPTER FIVE – SPECULATIVE CRAFT

FREEMASONRY
It is now generally accepted that speculative craft freemasonry began to emerge in the
seventeenth century.
Guild Masonry
Speculative craft freemasonry is a descendant, directly and indirectly, of the Guild
masonry of the Middle Ages. The skill of the medieval operative freemasons was
outstanding, reflecting the experience gained throughout the evolution of civilisation over
some 12,000 years, using brick and stone to construct every conceivable building from the
humblest dwellings to the stateliest edifices. The medieval freemasons were renowned for
the cathedrals they built and their work was the pinnacle of operative freemasonry. The
expression craft freemasonry is used to distinguish purely speculative freemasonry from
the practical craft of operative freemasonry, but it should not be inferred that there was no
speculative component in the work carried out in medieval operative lodges. They had
developed their own rich tradition and ceremonials, some very similar in presentation to
the Passion Plays of the Middle Ages. As the medieval guilds were highly secretive
concerning their private proceedings, information about their ceremonials is sketchy. Very
few relevant records have survived from Guild masonry in England. This fact has often led
masonic writers to infer that operative freemasonry had no speculative component and
therefore that speculative freemasonry could not have derived from it. Having regard to the
circumstances prevailing in those times, it is remarkable that any documentary evidence
has survived and been discovered!
Lodges of operative masons must have worked independently in the earliest days, because
travel was difficult and time consuming. However, some time in the twelfth century the
operative masons in England appear to have been organised under the protection of craft
guilds that came into existence to watch over the interests of skilled workers in the various
trades. The guilds were known as Fellowships or Fraternities and with the exception of
the operative masons their constituent trades worked under the provisions of relevant
ordinances. Craft guilds were also religious fraternities, whose members were required to
attend church frequently, if not regularly. Frith, or family peace guilds, existed in London
around the middle of the tenth century. The first merchant guild is believed to have
originated in Dover around the middle of the eleventh century, when the weaver guilds
also appear to have been formed. There is no doubt that many craft guilds were well
established in England during the reign of Henry I, by around 1135. There is evidence that
annual assemblages of masons were being held from the 1300s onwards and that they were
the gatherings that Henry VI unsuccessfully sought to prohibit by the Statutes of 1436-
1437. Under the guild system many families rose from serfdom to become employers in a
few generations. The system was highly successful until the Reformation, when Henry
VIII enforced the Act of 1547. It disendowed all religious fraternities, including lodges of
Page 52 of 103
operative masons. Henry VIII confiscated most of the guilds’ possessions and his son
Edward VI seized nearly all of the remaining guild funds that had been dedicated to
religious purposes. It was then that most guild records were destroyed to conceal the
identities of members of the guilds who might otherwise have suffered persecution. The
operative masons appear to have been the worst affected by the confiscations of property
and funds.
As in the other craft guilds, lodges of operative masons were subject to a strong religious
influence and their ceremonials had a significant religious component. Practical work and
its related instruction took place in the stone yards, but all moral and ethical instruction and
matters relating to general conduct, as well as the modes of recognition, were imparted in
the ceremonial lodges held weekly on Saturdays commencing at noon. All apprentices
were obligated and indentured in the ceremonial lodges, where candidates for promotion
also were examined, tested for proficiency in the non-manual aspects of their work,
obligated and entrusted. Lodges of operative masons were unique, because the rules and
regulations for their establishment and operation were set out in documents called the Old
Charges. The possession of an authentic copy of the Old Charges was the authority under
which a lodge worked. The Old Charges included a traditional history, rules governing
work practices and codes of conduct for behaviour at church, in the home and in company.
The oldest known record of the Old Charges is a document written by a priest, comprising
thirty-three vellum sheets and entitled the Poem of the Craft of Masonry, believed to have
been based on a much older document. It is known as the Regius MS or Halliwell MS and
is Document No 23,198 in the British Museum. It was discovered in 1839 and was thought
to have been written about 1390, which was later revised to 1410. In modern terminology
it is classified as dating from the first quarter of the fifteenth century. The rules and
regulations set out in the Regius MS are stated to have been established at a great
assemblage of masons ordered by King Athelstan. They are arranged under fifteen Articles
for ye maystur mason and fifteen Points for felows and prentes.
Prior to the Reformation, the guilds and other religious fraternities undoubtedly were the
guardians of centuries-old traditions and esoteric ceremonies, carefully concealed from
public scrutiny. Guilds that survived the Reformation became Livery Companies, some of
which still operate in the City of London. Livery comes from the Anglo-French liveré
meaning handed over, derived from the Latin liberäre meaning to free. The Worshipful
Company of Ffree Masons of the City of London was one guild that survived. It had
existed for several hundred years before the Reformation, continued through the
Reformation hidden from public view, then resurfaced after the Reformation. It was
commonly known as The Fellowship of Masons but in 1655, long after the Reformation, it
changed its name to The Company of Masons. Because all of the Company’s books and
documents were destroyed during the Reformation, those in existence only date from 1620.
Fortunately a collection of letter-books and various other records of the City of London
during the period of the Reformation are in existence, which confirm that The Company of
Masons existed without a break from late in the thirteenth century until the middle of the
seventeenth century. During the reconstruction of London after the Great Fire in 1666, the
Company was in serious decline. The last great work in which it was involved was Sir
Page 53 of 103
Christopher Wren’s masterpiece, St Paul’s Cathedral reconstructed from 1675 to 1707,

when eighty percent of the masons had to come from the country.
Operative Influences
The unbroken existence of The Company of Masons over some four hundred years
maintained the continuity of operative lodges in England, even through the fifteenth
century persecutions, which enabled their traditions and practices to be preserved. Possibly
other operative lodges also survived, though hidden from public view. Entries in the books
of The Company of Masons in 1620 and 1621 show that the membership then included
“accepted masons” as well as “operative masons”, but no records have been found to
indicate when or why any of the masons were “accepted”. Entries in 1648 and 1650
clearly indicate that the Company had an inner fraternity, known as the Acception, that
could be entered only on being made a freemason, but as there are no details of the
ceremonials associated with admission it is not known whether they were of an esoteric
nature. It is a matter of conjecture whether the “accepted masons” were speculative in the
modern sense, but it is reasonable to assume that some special benefit of membership was
perceived. From 1663 onwards the Company admitted to membership a number of people
who were not craftsmen, including several women. In 1713, six years after St Paul’s
Cathedral was completed, a woman was apprenticed for the usual term of seven years.
The usages and customs of operative masons that have come down to us in speculative
craft freemasonry include various traditions concerning the construction of the temple at
Jerusalem, the symbolic use of the working tools to impart moral instruction and the modes
of recognition used in the various grades of membership. When persons other than
tradesmen were first received into operative lodges, they were men of learning and public
stature who undoubtedly would have been welcomed because of their erudition and the
influence they could bring to bear in the community for the benefit of the members. Those
who had been received into membership also would have benefited from the widening of
their interests in the new avenues of tradition and knowledge that were then available to
them. As long ago as the 1500s many Scots lodges welcomed local lairds as honorary
members. Although they would not be regarded as speculative freemasons in the modern
sense, they were the forerunners of the many who joined Scottish operative lodges when
work was declining. The Lodge of Edinburgh minutes in 1600 record that James Boswell,
the Laird of Auchinleck, was in attendance and the minutes of 1634 record the admissions
of Lord Alexander, Sir Antony Alexander and Sir Alexander Strachan as Fellows of the
Craft. Those wishing to pursue these aspects in more detail would find The Pocket History
of Freemasonry by Fred L. Peck and G. Norman Knight, revised by Frederick Smyth and
the Freemasons’ Guide and Compendium by Bernard E. Jones of considerable interest.
In England the Civil War of 1642-1646 led to the domination of Oliver Cromwell, which
was followed by a very turbulent period until the settlement reached in 1689 when William
of Orange and Mary acceded to the throne of England. The few surviving records that have
been discovered now show that this was the formative period of modern speculative
freemasonry in England. This is in contrast with Scotland, where records reveal that many
Page 54 of 103
of the operative lodges progressively became speculative lodges. A significant event

during that period is the first known initiation on English soil of someone who was not an
operative mason. He was the Right Honourable Robert Moray, General Quartermaster of
the Scots army, who was admitted into the Lodge of Edinburgh at a meeting held near
Newcastle in May 1641. This lodge was also known as “Mary’s Chapel”. Robert Moray
later became Secretary of Scotland and in 1673 was buried in Westminster Abbey under
the name Murray. The earliest known record of an Englishman initiated as a speculative
freemason on English soil is of Elias Ashmole, the renowned antiquary, who was made a
mason in a lodge at Warrington in Lancashire in October 1646. Nothing is known about
the admissions into freemasonry of any of the other members of the lodge at that time, but
there is reason to believe that they included Royalists as well as supporters of Parliament.
There is no record of any of the members being an operative mason, although one may
have been.
In England some operative masons, such as the members of lodges engaged on the
construction of the York Minster, could work for a lifetime on a single project. Other
lodges could work for many years on smaller cathedrals before having to move to a new
work site, often in the same district. However, there always were small lodges that had to
move frequently, as well as many itinerant masons moving from site to site in search of
work. In Scotland the whole mason trade revolved around smaller operative lodges, of
which there were many more than in England. The territorial lodges in Scotland were
organised under the supervision of head lodges, which were not always in large towns. The
repressions of the Reformation were much less severe in Scotland than in England, so that
many of the Scottish operative lodges were able to become speculative lodges, a
development that had no direct parallel in England.
Throughout the Middle Ages and afterwards until well into the eighteenth century, travel
in Britain was greatly restricted and very hazardous. Although the more affluent residents
could make journeys on horseback or by horse and coach, ordinary persons were usually
confined to travelling on foot, commonly called going “on tramp”. Robbery under arms
was commonplace, so that the general population avoided travel whenever possible.
However, because of their vocation, operative masons often had to travel long distances in
search of new work. A unique custom in the craft was that an itinerant mason, when
seeking work in an operative lodge, had either to be given employment for an appropriate
minimum period or to be provided with sufficient sustenance to reach the next nearest
place of work. To facilitate their travel in safety, the operative masons in those days had
unobtrusive distinguishing signs enabling them to seek out members of the craft at
roadside hostelries, as well as modes of recognition with which to establish their
credentials with a prospective employer. Some masonic researchers hold the view that the
possession of masonic credentials for safe travel was a primary objective of those who
were “made” masons in the seventeenth century, calling it the “passport theory” for the
development of speculative craft freemasonry. While this might have been a contributing
factor in the development, it would not explain why the working tools and procedures of
operative masons were adopted as the basis of moral instruction in speculative craft
freemasonry.
Page 55 of 103
Modern Speculative Craft Freemasonry

It is now generally accepted that speculative craft freemasonry began to emerge in the
seventeenth century. This is when many operative lodges in Scotland already were
transforming into speculative lodges, when Elias Ashmole was made a mason in England
and when The Company of Masons in London had been admitting persons other than
masons to the Acception from about 1648. Of particular interest is a note in Elias
Ashmole’s diary in March 1682, recording his attendance at “a lodge held at Masons Hall
London”. He states that he was the “Senior Fellow among them”, that six gentlemen were
admitted into the “Fellowship of Free Masons” and that afterwards they dined at a tavern
in Cheapeside “at a Noble dinner prepaired at the charge of the New-accepted Masons”.
Excepting the new admissions, all but three of those present were members of The
Company of Masons, including its Master and several who had been Master in previous
years. References in various pamphlets and periodicals between 1676 and 1710 confirm
that Londoners then were more familiar with Freemasonry than with The Company of
Masons or the Acception. It is not known how many speculative lodges had been formed
in England before June 1717, when four or possibly six among the oldest of them
assembled in London and established the first Grand Lodge, claiming jurisdiction over all
lodges meeting in London and Westminster. Its sphere of jurisdiction included at least
sixty-four lodges by 1726, when it had become known as the Grand Lodge of England
and its first two Provincial Grand Masters had been appointed. Of the founding lodges, it is
recorded that the Original No 1 was constituted in 1691, but it is believed to have had an
earlier origin and that its members almost certainly had been members of an operative
lodge involved in the rebuilding of St Paul’s Cathedral from 1675 to 1710.
Unlike the situation in Scotland, only one lodge of operative masons in England that is
known to have become a speculative lodge is still in existence. Originally it was located at
Stalwell in County Durham and accepted a warrant from the Grand Lodge of England in
1735. It continued to work as an operative lodge for another twenty years before becoming
speculative and moving to Gateshead, where it still meets as the Lodge of Industry No 48.
By way of contrast another lodge of operative masons meeting at Alnwick in
Northumberland, that had been in existence long before the Grand Lodge of England was
formed, did not accept a warrant and appears to have ceased to function in about 1763. Its
minutes from 1703 onwards are still in existence, together with a copy of the Old Charges
and a code of rules devised by the lodge in 1701. It is of note that when Dr James
Anderson drafted the original Constitutions for the Grand Lodge of England in 1723, not
more than ten copies of the Old Charges were available for his reference, although more
than a hundred have now been found and classified. The Cooke MS was the oldest copy of
the Old Charges used when compiling the Constitutions. It is the second oldest known to
be in existence and is held in the library of the British Museum. As its date of origin has
been assessed to be around fifty years after the Regius MS, it also was in use before the
Act of 1547 that disendowed all religious fraternities. These two documents have many
similarities, although the Cooke MS was intended primarily as a history. The third oldest
copy of the Old Charges is known as the Grand Lodge MS No 1, dated 25 December
1583. Having been written after the Act of 1547, it is significant because it reflects a
Page 56 of 103
distinct transition from the purely operative nature of earlier documents and includes much
that is of a speculative nature.
In 1725 an operative lodge of great antiquity in York, then in the process of becoming
speculative, proclaimed itself to be a Grand Lodge. In the following year it also claimed to
be the “Grand Lodge of All England”, because of its “undoubted right”, disputing the
superiority of the Grand Lodge of England, even though its authority never extended
beyond Yorkshire. This operative lodge was dormant from 1740 to 1760 and finally ceased
to operate in about 1792, although it was never formally dissolved. In Ireland there is no
record of any operative lodge becoming a speculative lodge. The earliest reference to a
speculative lodge is in the opening address given in 1688 by John Jones at Trinity College
in Dublin. Of interest is The Dublin Weekly Journal report in June 1725 that six “Lodges
of Gentlemen Freemasons” met and elected a new Grand Master. This is the earliest
reference to the Grand Lodge of Ireland, because all official records prior to 1760 have
been lost. This contrasts with Scotland where most operative lodges continued into the
1750s and even longer, although by then many of them had become speculative. The
Masters and Wardens of four old lodges that were or had been operative met in Edinburgh
in October 1736 and formed the Grand Lodge of Scotland. Two of those lodges and
several others joining soon after still exist and have records substantiating their continuity
from operative days. The “Grand Lodge of Antients” was formed in England in 1752, to
protest against the apathy and neglect being displayed by the Grand Lodge of England,
which they dubbed “the Moderns”, as well as expressing dissatisfaction with the rituals
being used and the ceremonials being practised. The Antients and the Moderns finally
settled their differences when their two Grand Masters signed and sealed twenty-one
Articles of Union in 1813. These were quickly ratified by the two Grand Lodges
representing 647 lodges, thus establishing the United Grand Lodge of England which
continues in existence. The Grand Lodge of Antients undoubtedly had a substantial
influence on the rituals used in modern speculative freemasonry.
Modern freemasonry has many branches, with a multitude of complementary degrees that
are progressive along a variety of paths. The constitutions and laws of modern Grand
Lodges usually refer to their members as Antient, Free and Accepted Masons. Most
constitutions define Pure Antient Masonry as the three degrees of Entered Apprentice,
Fellow Craft and Master Mason, but frequently also include either or both of the
Honourable Degree of Mark Master Mason and the Supreme Order of the Holy Royal
Arch, even though these latter degrees usually are not worked under the auspices of the
Grand Lodge. The traditional degrees of freemasonry include all of the foregoing and
several others that are based on the story of the construction of King Solomon’s temple at
Jerusalem, its subsequent destruction when the Jews were exiled to Babylon and its
rebuilding by Zerubbabel under the provisions of the Decree of Cyrus. The narratives of
the traditional degrees are woven around a series of events recorded in the Old Testament.
Other important orders in modern freemasonry are the Royal Order of Scotland, the
Ancient and Accepted Rite, the Red Cross of Constantine, the Knights Templar and the
Knight Templar Priests, all of which have Christian aspects, as well as others such as the
Allied Masonic Degrees. Of particular relevance is “The Worshipful Society of Free
Masons, Rough Masons, Wallers, Slaters, Paviors, Plaisterers and Bricklayers”.
Page 57 of 103
Commonly referred to as The Operatives, this Society was founded in 1913 by the few
remaining members of some English operative lodges that were rapidly becoming defunct,
so as to ensure that the traditions and ceremonials of the operative masons would be
perpetuated, because they were in imminent danger of being lost.
The Purpose Of Freemasonry

The catechism that every initiate in speculative craft freemasonry is required to learn
defines freemasonry as a peculiar system of morality veiled in allegory and illustrated by
symbols, but there are many misconceptions about the purpose of freemasonry. A
significant factor contributing to this dilemma is the reversal in the roles of two key
elements in the practice of the speculative freemasonry. The available records clearly show
that the founders of speculative craft freemasonry in England regarded a lodge meeting
primarily as a forum for philosophical communion in search of spiritual elevation, wherein
the members could discourse upon a wide range of relevant topics, more or less in the
fashion of meetings of the Royal Society to which many of them belonged. Before an
application for membership would be considered, the petitioner was required to
demonstrate that his interests were compatible with those of the members. Admission into
the various degrees was to ensure that all members had a common foundation for their
activities in the lodge, as well as establishing a basis for assessing the credentials of
strangers wishing to attend meetings. This followed the precedents established in lodges of
operative masons and other trade and religious fraternities that had been in existence for
many centuries. In contrast, most modern lodges place the greatest emphasis on the
working of the various degrees, almost to the exclusion of philosophical discussion on the
underlying teachings incorporated in the rituals of those degrees. There can be no doubt
that this approach has contributed significantly to the continuing decline in membership.
It would be difficult to find a more comprehensive and enlightening discourse on the

purpose of freemasonry than that expounded in The Spirit of Masonry by Foster Bailey, of
which the following are some relevant excerpts:
“Masonry might first of all be regarded as a school of ethical training. It

is, however, much more than that. Every Mason is supposed to be ‘of good
report and well recommended’. He enters Masonry in order ‘to learn to
subdue his passions’ and to ‘improve himself in Masonry’. . . . . .”
“Masonry is also a training school in cooperative and fraternal work. It

implies therefore the submergence of all personal and consequently
temperamental attitudes in the good of the Craft. . . . . .”
“From another angle we might look upon speculative Masonry as

embodying symbolically the drama of human evolution and as picturing
for us the steps by which man reaches the goal of his liberation. The
progress made by the candidate as he enters the Temple for the first time
and passes from one degree to another, can be studied as a dramatic
Page 58 of 103
representation of the search for light and for the Word of God which
characterises every soul. Masonry portrays the eternal quest. In total
ignorance, blind and defenceless, man enters into the Temple of Life.
Progressively he arrives at greater light and knowledge; he becomes
worthy of receiving a reward and later can attain to an increase in wages.
Still later he comes to a realisation of those hidden indications which
warrant his pushing forward in search of the Lost Word which can only
be sought by a Master Mason. Steadily he goes forward using all the light
available, travelling from the West to the East by way of the North. In
spite of the difficulties and dangers encountered, he achieves increased
knowledge and begins to ‘perfect himself in Masonry’.”
“It might in conclusion be pointed out that (in this process of revealing
the hidden and secret) certain undesirable aspects of the Masonic work
and organisation must inevitably disappear. The appetite of curiosity
seekers, the private political machinations of certain Masonic groups and
the purely social and commercial incentives which govern much of the
Masonic policies in many lands must end. They only besmirch the fair
name of a deeply spiritual organisation. The mystery of spirit, the mystery
of light, the mystery of our relation to God and to each other, the mystery
of our search for truth and divine experience and the mystery of
immortality and resurrection must emerge in their true place . . . . . .”
Page 59 of 103
CHAPTER SIX – THE PRECEPTS OF

FREEMASONRY
First and foremost among the precepts of freemasonry is a belief in a divine creator.
In The Beginning
A study of human evolution, especially in relation to the development of thought and
speech in conjunction with a growing awareness of things beyond their daily existence,
reveals an intimate connection with the development of freemasonry. When they had
achieved an ability to eke out a frugal subsistence within their natural environment, the
primitive hunter-gatherers then turned their thoughts to improving their personal comfort.
With the erection of their first rudimentary shelters, the seeds of masonry were sown,
heralding the imminent birth of speculative freemasonry. Articulate speech became an ever
more pressing necessity, as humans sought to communicate their thoughts and wishes to
other humans and their minds strived to fathom the significance of their mortal existence.
Operative masonry began in the Stone Age and its speculative counterpart developed
concurrently. These two components of freemasonry were intimately interwoven and
together reflected the physical and intellectual progress of humanity and the development
of human spiritual conception.
When primitive humans tried to comprehend their place and purpose in the universe, they
sensed a spiritual presence in their existence. Thus evolved the perception of a creator, a
supreme being or controlling force from which all things emanated and upon which all
things depended for their continuing existence. As civilisation evolved and human beings
tried to explain the concepts they were developing, they drew on the experiences of their
physical existence. Freemasonry provided many useful examples that could be used to
portray their growing appreciation of the spiritual elements of life and to illustrate the
moral principles they were formulating. Thus the speculative aspects of freemasonry
evolved as a natural extension of the human vocabulary, enabling moral precepts to be
expounded simply and graphically.
The First Principle

First and foremost among the precepts of freemasonry is a belief in a divine creator, the
one true God. This belief is the foundation of all masonic teaching, the cornerstone of
every branch of freemasonry and the keystone that unites its many component parts. A
belief in a supreme being is the first principle of freemasonry, from which all else derives.
This is the reason why no man can be accepted into freemasonry unless he has freely
expressed a belief in God. A man’s religion is immaterial to his acceptance into
Page 60 of 103
freemasonry, because it is only a factor of his upbringing or a matter of personal choice,

but his belief in God is of paramount importance. Every degree in freemasonry
acknowledges the existence of a supreme being, whose blessing is supplicated at the
opening and closing of all proceedings. As in the ancient mysteries and in all religions, the
various titles that are used with reference to God in masonic rituals reflect those attributes
of God that are of special relevance to the circumstances portrayed in the particular
ceremonial.
An essential component of a freemason’s belief in a divine creator is the faith that a human
being’s spirit does not perish with its mortal frame, which is so eloquently expressed by
the preacher’s words in Ecclesiastes 12:7 - “then the dust shall return to the earth as it
was and the spirit shall return to God who gave it”. The freemason is exhorted to
contemplate this aspect of his ultimate destiny and to regulate his life and actions
according to God’s will, so that at the end of this transitory mortal life he may confidently
hope to be raised to those “immortal mansions, eternal in the heavens”. Although various
moral issues are expounded in the three degrees of craft freemasonry, the fundamental
substance of their teachings concerns the immortality of the soul and its ultimate return to
the divine creator.
As the neophyte was received in poverty in all the ancient mysteries, so also does the
Apprentice in freemasonry enter the lodge in a state of indigence, when he is reminded of
his defenceless condition and his absolute dependence upon his creator is emphasised.
Symbolically, the initiate is being reborn on his entry into freemasonry and is exhorted to
lead a just and upright life thenceforth. As a Fellow of the Craft, the freemason is taught
that labour is the lot of man, but that in due course every good and faithful servant will
receive his just reward. As a Master Mason the freemason obtains a fleeting glimpse of the
promised reward, but he is then told that he must continue his search for the ultimate truth.
A closely related theme is the important concept that all human beings are equal in the
sight of God. This fundamental tenet of freemasonry is taught in many of its degrees and is
the central theme of the Knights of Constantinople, one of the degrees in the Order of the
Allied Masonic Degrees.
Behaviour And Responsibility

A central theme in the teachings of freemasonry is the importance of obeying God’s
commands. It is of such crucial importance that it is a central part of the instruction given
to the Apprentice. The theme continues in the instruction given to a Fellow of the Craft and
is emphasised in the degree of Mark Master Mason. Strict obedience, the exercise of skill
and ability, careful attention to detail and the importance of being responsible for one’s
own actions are impressed on the Mark Master Mason by a practical example from the
work of an operative freemason. The candidate is taught that he alone must be responsible
for his own actions, for which he will receive his just reward in a life hereafter if he has
lived in strict accordance with the divine commands. Obedience to God’s commands is so
important and so closely allied to the belief in the immortality of the soul, that it merits
being ranked as second among the precepts of freemasonry.
Page 61 of 103
Social Conduct
It will be evident from the foregoing discussions that the fundamental precepts of
freemasonry are so closely interwoven that they cannot be subdivided into distinct and
separable compartments. Even so, brotherly love, relief and truth must be regarded as third
among the important precepts of freemasonry, because they are so closely interrelated with
the principle that all human beings are equal in the sight of God. In this context the
teachings are based on concepts established by the operative freemasons, who were
charged with the responsibility of caring for the members of their fraternity, especially if
they were out of work or in indigent circumstances. They were required to respect and
protect all members of their brethren’s families and were enjoined to regard their
employers with due deference and to serve them well, in return for which they were
promised regular employment and adequate recompense.
Brotherly love, relief and truth are described as the grand principles on which freemasonry
is founded. They are said to shine with greater splendour than any other masonic emblems.
The concept is introduced to the Apprentice in his impoverished state, when his principles
are in some measure put to the test. The Apprentice is admonished to practise brotherly
love and relief cheerfully and as a virtue, providing whatever assistance is within his
means should a distressed brother fairly claim assistance. It is only later, when a
speculative freemason becomes a Master Mason, that the full implications of this virtue are
clarified in the old operative terms, partly in the obligation and partly under the five points
of fellowship. In operative freemasonry the five points of fellowship were an essential
element of the instruction imparted to Fellows of the Craft. The importance of truth is
taught in various degrees and it is the central theme in the Knight of the East, which is that
part of the work of the Red Cross of Babylon that is set in the Persian court. The scene
enacted in the degree is graphically portrayed in the Bible in the first book of Esdras.
Integrity
Closely allied with truth is integrity, which depends upon truth for its fulfilment. Integrity
and rectitude imply a rigorous compliance with a code of ethics, based on an undeviating
honesty that ascribes virtue to the subject. Rectitude is a strict adherence to the rules of
right and justice, which strongly suggests self-discipline. Both integrity and rectitude are
distinctive features of goodness that also have a close affinity with morality, righteousness,
purity and virtue. None of these attributes can be considered alone, because each
influences the other. Even benevolence, generosity, good will and kindness, which relate
more specifically to brotherly love and relief, have a bearing on integrity. Thus there can
be no doubt that integrity merits its high standing among the precepts of freemasonry. It is
an important theme in many of the degrees in freemasonry. In particular the degree of
Select Master, in the Cryptic Rite, teaches that constant care and integrity are essential
Page 62 of 103
when carrying out one’s duties, but at the same time emphasising that integrity must
always be tempered with justice and mercy.
The Moral Virtues

Of the many moral virtues fostered by freemasonry, the three principle ones are called
faith, hope and charity. Faith has been defined as the evidence of things not seen, the
substance of things hoped for. Faith is the pillar of civilised society, because it is the bond
of amity and the foundation of justice. Hope has been defined as an anchor for the soul,
which enters into that which is within the veil, suggesting that we may look forward to a
positive and favourable outcome to our lives and actions if they have been carried out in
accordance with God’s commands. Charity is described as the brightest ornament that can
adorn masonry, because it is lovely in itself and also is the best test and surest proof of
sincerity. Charity, which is brotherly love in its truest sense, is said to comprehend all of
the virtues. The principles illustrated in these moral virtues are essential elements of
brotherly love, relief, truth and integrity and therefore are important precepts that should
always activate a freemason’s heart in his relations with others.
The Social Virtues

Temperance, fortitude, prudence and justice are called the four cardinal virtues of
freemasonry. They are very closely related to the three moral virtues, which is sufficient
justification for their inclusion amongst the most important precepts of freemasonry. In its
correct usage, temperance indicates a wise moderation in the indulgence of personal
pleasures, although often incorrectly applied to signify their complete rejection.
Temperance is the appropriate restraint of our passions and affections that will ensure
proper self control and overcome immoderate temptation. This virtue ought to be the
constant practice of every freemason, enabling him to resist worldly temptation and to
avoid excesses. Temperance is an essential element in the exercise of true justice.
Fortitude signifies that firmness and strength of mind which will enable obstacles and
ordeals to be faced courageously, with a brave and unswerving resourcefulness that is
neither rash nor cowardly. Fortitude is closely allied with prudence, which suggests that
any action that is proposed should take into account the wisdom that has been gained by
experience. Prudence enables us to regulate our lives and actions with due regard to the
dictates of reason. Fortitude and prudence are both essential elements in the exercise of
justice and complement that impartiality, rightness, integrity and mercy that is signified by
justice. All of these elements must be taken into account when determining what would
constitute true justice in any particular set of circumstances. Thus the four cardinal virtues
are unmistakably reflected in the important principles that are the foundation of proper
masonic behaviour.
Page 63 of 103
The Intellectual Virtues

The three great pillars that symbolically support a freemason’s lodge are called wisdom,
strength and beauty. They refer to the triune essence of the Deity, whose wisdom is
infinite, whose strength is omnipotent and whose beauty shines forth throughout the whole
of the creation in symmetry and order. In a freemasons’ lodge they also represent the
Master of the lodge and his Wardens and are depicted on the first tracing board as columns
of the three most celebrated of the classical orders of architecture, which are the Ionic, the
Doric and the Corinthian. The Ionic column represents the Master and signifies wisdom.
The Doric column represents the Senior Warden and signifies strength. The Corinthian
column represents the Junior Warden and signifies beauty. Wisdom denotes those mental
qualities that enable us to understand situations, anticipate their consequences and make
sound decisions. Wisdom implies the highest and noblest exercise of all the faculties of the
moral nature and the mental capabilities, suggesting an appropriate balance of discretion,
maturity, keenness of intellect, broad experience, extensive learning, profound thought and
compassionate understanding. Strength signifies power, might, force, solidity, toughness,
fortitude, courage and many other things. Beauty signifies elegance, grace, symmetry,
seemliness, fairness and a wide range of related attributes. The freemason is exhorted to
apply wisdom in all his undertakings, to bring strength of character to bear when in
difficulties and to adorn his inward self with beauty. A consideration of these attributes of
behaviour is a fitting conclusion to a study of the precepts of freemasonry.
Page 64 of 103
CHAPTER SEVEN - THE SYMBOLS OF

FREEMASONRY
Signs and symbols have been in use ever since the first hominids tried to communicate
with their associates, even preceding articulate speech.
Symbols In Antiquity
Symbolism is not a modern innovation. Signs and symbols have been in use ever since the
first hominids tried to communicate with their associates, even preceding articulate speech.
Before speech, the only available means of communication was by signs or gestures, by the
use of which it was sought to convey some physical need or personal desire. Those making
or observing particular gestures gradually developed, as a natural reaction, the uttering of
sounds as the gestures were made. With the lapse of time, particular sounds came to be
associated with particular gestures, so that they became recognisable as being
representative of the gestures themselves. These sounds eventually evolved as words,
which provided a simpler means of expressing needs and desires. From that time onwards
the roles of sound and gesture were reversed in communication, so that gestures were
primarily used to give emphasis when required. Variations of these basic words gradually
developed, being used to differentiate between objects and actions as well as to
characterise shades of meaning. A rudimentary grammar naturally evolved as coherent
speech matured, while symbolism also developed to become an immutable component
inherent in everyday life and language.
Coherent speech soon fostered a desire to create visual records, which in turn led to the
development of the written word. Writing in its original form was a series of crude
pictograms that represented individual objects or actions that became words, which again
interchanged the roles of speech and symbols. The use of pictograms led to the
development of cuneiform writing by the Sumerians in Mesopotamia and pictograms were
the basis of the conventionalised characters used in Chinese and Japanese writing. By
comparison, the very simple pictograms of the American Indians were never developed
into an alphabetical form of writing. Elaborate pictograms also were the basis of the
Egyptian hieroglyphs. Until very recently it was thought that the pictographic script of the
Sumerians was the earliest, but excavations commenced in 1988 at Abydos in Egypt
confirm that hieroglyphs had been in use before the time of King Narmer, who united his
kingdom of Upper Egypt with the delta kingdom of Lower Egypt in about 3200 BCE. King
Narmer is thought to be the same person as the legendary King Menes, the first pharaoh of
Egypt.
These latest excavations and discoveries at Abydos are described in a book entitled Egypt
by Vivian Davies and Renée Friedman, who were assisted by an extensive panel of
experts. Their findings indicate that the Egyptian hieroglyphs did not evolve in stages like
Page 65 of 103
cuneiform writing, as was previously believed, but that they seem to have been established
from the outset as a comprehensive means of communication. Thus, although many of the
characters were used to represent complete words, most of them also signified sounds or
combinations of sounds and were used in a similar manner to modern alphabets. Hieratic,
which is a cursive form of the Egyptian hieroglyphs, seems to have evolved for everyday
use by about 3000 BCE, when it usually was written in ink on papyrus. A much later
derivative of Hieratic was the Demotic script, which was developed in about 700 BCE. The
Demotic script was popular throughout the Greco-Roman period and was used by literate
Egyptians for their literary pursuits, as well as for business and private correspondence.
As language became more sophisticated, the pictographic form of writing soon became
inadequate, because the embellishments of oral expression were difficult to record. As a
result of this deficiency, early scripts such as the Canaanite from around 2000 BCE and the
Sinaitic from around 1500 BCE, had developed over many centuries using an alphabet in
which the characters were based on Egyptian hieroglyphs that originally represented
physical objects and actions. These scripts were followed by the Phoenician around 1000
BCE and its early Hebrew derivatives around 700 BCE, which used symbols to represent
consonants, but left the vowels to be understood. Symbols gradually became standardized
and were stylised in the final stage of writing, as represented by the Greek alphabet and its
Roman derivative, both of which have symbols for consonants and vowels, allowing every
nuance of oral expression to be recorded.
Language and writing are two of the greatest intellectual achievements of the human race,
without which all other achievements would not have been possible. Language and writing
transcend personal intercommunication and the maintenance of records, because it
facilitates both logical thought and rational evaluation. This complex use of symbols
enables the mortal mind to contemplate the wonders of the creation and the promise of a
spiritual life hereafter, as well as to explore and progressively solve the mysteries of the
universe, clearly distinguishing humans from all other life on earth.
Symbols In The Sacred Writings

There can be no doubt that, in the process of their evolvement through the ages, speech and
writing have established themselves as the most pervasive of all symbols in the modern
world. Writing was derived from previously acquired abilities to draft other symbols,
utilising a variety of methods. For example, the hieroglyphic writing of Egypt was painted
on papyrus at least from 3250 BCE, using techniques similar to those first developed by
the Magdalenians for their cave paintings made in about 15000 BCE. Recent excavations
at Abydos, in tombs of a previously unknown dynasty now referred to as Dynasty 0, have
unearthed bone and ivory labels that date from around 3250 BCE and are engraved with
hieroglyphics that use signs for sounds and are the same as those used in later dynasties.
The slate palette of King Narmer found in 1898 among a collection of temple offerings
buried in the ancient capital of the Kingdom of Upper Egypt, Hierakonpolis, meaning City
of the Falcon in Greek, has now been dated to 3100 BCE. Engraved on both sides, it
graphically illustrates the uniting of the Upper and Lower Kingdoms. The hieroglyphs
Page 66 of 103
proclaim Narmer as King and say that “Horus, the patron god of kingship, now controls
the delta”. An even earlier palette from Hierakonpolis dates from around 3200 BCE.
The cuneiform script of Sumeria was an adaptation of the wedge shaped imprints made by
a stylus upon wet clay tablets, from about 3100 BCE or possibly earlier. A characteristic of
the cuneiform script is that it is composed almost exclusively of straight lines, because it is
difficult to make regular curves with a stylus. The original cuneiform script was used to
prepare lists of commodities and taxation details, from which the language texts gradually
evolved using around five hundred different symbols. One of the earliest known clay
tablets inscribed with Mesopotamian writing dates from about 3000 BCE. Texts, such as
the Canaanite inscriptions on Ahiram’s sarcophagus unearthed at the ancient city of Gebal,
now called Byblos, have been carved on stone from as early as 1100 BCE, using metal
chisels and gravers. From the inception of writing, these and other practical aspects of the
arts and crafts have been interwoven with the techniques of communication, which has
greatly enhanced the evolution of the symbols.
In the early stages of the development of articulate speech, symbols referred almost
entirely to those things that were required for subsistence, augmented by a few symbols
reflecting actions of practical importance in everyday life. As speech became more
sophisticated and writing developed, additional symbols were introduced to reflect the
abstract ideas beginning to formulate in the human mind. The earliest known recordings of
abstract ideas relate to the concept that, when a human being dies, its spirit will be
transmigrated from the mortal body to a life hereafter. A belief in the immortality of the
human spirit and that it will continue to live in eternity is illustrated graphically by
hieroglyphic inscriptions in early tombs of the Egyptian pharaohs. With the advent of
cursive writing abstract ideas could be expressed even more vividly, as exemplified in
Ecclesiastes, wherein the preacher portrays the transitory nature and consummate
emptiness of earthly life and the certainty of death, which is counterbalanced by the hope
that the soul will live on in immortality. The sacred writings of all religions include
allegories, or long and elaborate stories, which illustrate moral principals that frequently
are not stated specifically, but are left for the recipient to discover. Briefer parables also are
used, typically showing the application of a moral precept in a familiar situation, so that
abstract principles are represented in a concrete and vibrant form.
Egyptian hieroglyphs confirm that the attributes of implements, tools and other well known
objects were used in ancient times as symbols to demonstrate the requirements for proper
moral conduct. This graphic use of symbols to convey important religious messages
continued through Biblical times and culminated in the century preceding the Christian era,
when the pesher technique was introduced into the Hebrew scriptures. Pesher is a Hebrew
word signifying an interpretation or explanation, derived from peshitta, another Hebrew
word meaning simple, or plain. The Syrian word peshitta and its adjectival form, peshito,
are used to designate the versions of the Old and New Testaments that were translated
from the ancient Syriac and are sometimes called the principal versions or the Syriac
Vulgate. In the Old Testament pesher signifies interpretation of dreams, but in the scrolls
of the Christian era it is used to indicate that a section of text has a second or special
hidden meaning. Many of the Old Testament texts are used with the pesher technique to
Page 67 of 103
convey special messages, some having been established by tradition over hundreds of
years.
The Origin Of Masonic Symbols

We know that operative freemasonry has included the design and construction of
ecclesiastical buildings in historical times, but archaeological investigations prove that
freemasonry was already being influenced by religion when the Egyptian stonemasons
began to construct tombs at Helwan, the necropolis of their ancient capitals of Saqqara and
Memphis. The tombs at Helwan are at least 350 years older than the Pharaoh Zoser’s
stepped pyramid built at Saqqara in about 2650 BCE. King Solomon’s temple at Jerusalem
is the oldest for which we have detailed records. Completed about 950 BCE after more
than seven years under construction, it is a pre-eminent example of the vision and
inspiration required in the conception and erection of such buildings. Every feature of that
magnificent edifice was of religious and symbolic importance. The Biblical record leaves
no doubt of the comprehensive knowledge that the masons and their associated artificers
must have had of the symbolism embodied in the structure and its lavish furnishings and
also in the facilities in the surrounding court. Flavius Josephus (c.37-c.100), the renowned
Jewish soldier and historian, was the governor of Galilee and displayed great valour
against the advance of Vespasian. In his treatise Antiquity of the Jews, Josephus recorded
that when King Herod the Great restored the second temple erected by Zerubbabel, he not
only carried out the work piecemeal to avoid interrupting the usual ritual observances, but
also trained 1,000 priests to work as masons when building the shrine. The restoration of
the temple was begun in 19 BCE and completed in 64 CE, but the temple was completely
destroyed by the Romans in 70 CE.
After that time the operative freemasons were engaged continually in massive construction
projects for the Roman Empire, until the fall of Rome in 410, when captured by the
Visigoths. In the meantime Constantine the Great, who was then Emperor of Byzantium,
had prevailed over the heathen Romans in 330, when Constantinople became the capital of
the Roman Empire. Constantine established Christianity in the East and carried out the first
great wave of Christian ecclesiastical building, surpassing even the efforts of the Persian
renaissance. This work continued unabated until Constantinople was captured by the Turks
in 1453. In western Europe, when the Dark Ages that lasted from the fifth to at least the
ninth century drew to a close, an incredible era of cathedral building was ushered in and
continued unbroken from the late Middle Ages through the Renaissance. Even in Britain,
which was seriously hampered by the Reformation in the mid-1500s, work on
ecclesiastical buildings continued into the 1700s. During this period many hundreds of
churches, cathedrals, castles and civic buildings were constructed. The Chartres Cathedral
in France is a renowned example of ecclesiastical structures. It was the first in the Gothic
style, built over a period of some forty years and completed during the 1230s. The York
Minster probably is the best known example in England and is frequently and lovingly
called “poetry in stone”. It was completed in 1474 after several distinct stages of work
over a period of two and a half centuries.
Page 68 of 103
Operative freemasons worked on religious structures and were immersed in religious

activities for a period of more than five thousand years. This necessitated the freemasons
having an intimate and detailed knowledge of the doctrines and tenets of the religions in
respect of which they were carrying out the work, so that the religious beliefs could be
reflected in the structures and especially in the details of their ornamentation. For example,
the hieroglyphs that adorn the chambers of ancient Egyptian pyramids and tombs are
replete with symbols that depict the search for and the conceived journey to a life hereafter.
It was inevitable that the fundamental principles of speculative freemasonry should be
moulded by such a long and close association with religion, with the result that the
symbolism of freemasonry developed in parallel with the operative art. All extant records
of the ceremonials in operative lodges confirm that symbols played a vital part in their
teachings, providing a stimulus for the development of speculative contemplation. The
incorporation of symbols into the rituals of purely speculative lodges was a natural
extension of this long established practice. Indeed, the principles actuating those who
formed the first purely speculative lodges made it an inescapable outcome, prompting them
to describe freemasonry as “a peculiar system of morality, veiled in allegory and
illustrated by symbols”, which aptly defines one of its central tenets.
The Scope Of Masonic Symbolism

With such a close and continuing association with all aspects of religious thought and
practice down through the ages, it is inevitable that freemasonry should have encompassed
all of the symbolism that derives from the ancient mysteries and the great religions of the
world. This does not imply that every such symbol is used, nor that the usages are
identical, but all important aspects of symbolism have been incorporated in the teachings
and rituals of freemasonry. Specific aspects adopted and adapted from the ancient
mysteries and religion include preparation in a personal sense, to establish an appropriate
receptiveness for moral instruction. Parables are included in the rituals to provide ethical
instruction. Exoteric stories are the foundation of the work in many of the rituals, often
being woven around elaborate allegories as a basis for the communication of fundamental
precepts. The esoteric interpretations of several of these allegories are concealed in a
manner analogous to the pesher technique used in sacred writings of the early Christian
era.
The first symbol encountered in freemasonry is preparation, as it was in the ancient

mysteries. It combines mental disposition, meditation and symbolic purification, coupled
with the wearing of appropriate apparel and accoutrements. Darkness is an essential
precursor of light, which light is attained by trial through a symbolic journey. All of these
aspects, including bathing in water, were involved when initiating an apprentice into a
lodge of operative freemasons. However, in the traditional degrees of speculative
freemasonry a purely symbolic form of ablution is used in only a few of the ceremonies. In
operative freemasonry, bathing was the equivalent of baptism by immersion which was the
final step in admission to the early Christian church, as it still is in some sects. Nowadays
ablution in speculative freemasonry is akin to the modern form of baptism of sprinkling
with water when clothed in white. A form of ritual ablution is carried out by Muslims
Page 69 of 103
before they enter a mosque for prayer and during their pilgrimage to Mecca they are
clothed in white when perambulating round the Kaaba, the holy building into which the
Black Stone is built. All important religions include some form of symbolic preparation,
journey and acquisition of light, which is a procedure that has been regarded from time
immemorial as a spiritual rebirth.
The various modes of recognition entrusted to candidates are symbols of importance, most
of which are of origin from when trade secrets were “mysteries” and the knowledge of
them had to be guarded jealously. A wide range of the freemason’s working tools,
materials, gauges and methods are used symbolically to provide moral instruction which
often, though not necessarily, refers to work on King Solomon’s temple. The temple is a
pre-eminent symbol in freemasonry, signifying that house not made with hands, eternal in
the heavens. It is an emblem of a glorious futurity, as Ezekiel’s mystical temple was for the
Israelites during their period of captivity in Babylon. Many aspects of the construction of
the temple by King Solomon, its dedication about 950 BCE, its final destruction by
Nebuchadnezzar in 587 BCE and the construction of the second temple by Zerubbabel
between 537 BCE and 515 BCE after the return of the Israelites from their captivity, are
incorporated in dramatic detail in parables that are the basis of the traditional degrees in
freemasonry. Features of the temple, such as the two great pillars at the entrance, are also
used as symbols. Many of the symbolic interpretations are sufficiently well known to have
become a part of everyday usage, some early enough to have been recorded in the Hebrew
Scriptures.
The Mystical Theme

Important mystical themes are hidden beneath the superficial moral themes of the more
important allegories in freemasonry, which are in the nature of the medieval Passion
Plays. One of the important allegories relates to a late stage in the construction of King
Solomon’s Temple, when several of the workers feared that they would not be given the
modes of recognition and therefore would not be able to obtain work after the completion
of the temple. When the principal architect was accosted he remained true to his vows and
was slain, so that substitute modes of recognition had to be used thereafter. The superficial
story is that death is preferable to dishonour and that we must perform our allotted tasks
whilst we can, believing that we will be a justly rewarded at the appropriate time. The
esoteric message is that mortal death is only a gateway for the resurrection of the spirit to a
life hereafter, which can be achieved by a steadfast faith in the Most High. The theme is
continued in a dramatic allegory in another degree, when we are assured that the “Word”
has been preserved from vandalism in a place of safety, which signifies esoterically that
the “True Word” transcends mortal delinquency and can always be found through faith.
The foregoing allegories are connected by another allegory relating to a vital stage in the
construction of King Solomon’s temple. In its various forms it relates either to the great
cornerstone or to the keystone required to complete the arch of the secret vault. In the
superficial story, a diligent and faithful craftsman prepares the beautiful piece of stonework
required to complete the structure, but as it cannot be found on the plans it is rejected and
Page 70 of 103
the work comes to a standstill. When the missing stone is recovered, work continues and
the skilful craftsman receives his just reward. The esoteric interpretation is that the
acceptance or rejection of this life’s work is not within the province of mortal beings,
because the gates of victory are only opened through the grace of that “Living Stone”
which the builders rejected, but which became the chief cornerstone, as foretold in Isaiah
28:16 and confirmed in I Peter 2:6.
Another allegory relates to the period after the destruction of King Solomon’s temple,
when the captives in Babylon are released by the Decree of Cyrus and return to Jerusalem
to rebuild the temple. In the ceremony of passing the veils three sojourners travel to
Jerusalem and present their credentials to the Sanhedrin, seeking work on the new temple,
but in most rituals the scripture readings refer to the Exodus from Egypt under Moses and
the erection of the Tabernacle. The passing of the veils replicates a ceremonial carried out
every seven weeks by the Therapeutae Essenes at Qumran, which exhorted obedience to
the Covenant until the second coming of the Lord. The moral is revealed in a continuing
allegory, when the sojourners are put to work to clear away the rubbish in preparation for
the second temple. By their diligence the “Lost Word” is recovered, which teaches that
everyone is equal in the sight of God and that even the lowest work will receive full and
just reward if properly carried out. The esoteric lesson is that salvation can be found only
through a complete faith in the “True Word”, which represents the present, future and
eternal “I Am”.
Further Reading
There are several books of special value to those wishing to acquire a deeper understanding
of the symbols and symbolism of speculative craft freemasonry. They include three
esoteric but very readable books by George H. Steinmetz, Freemasonry - Its Hidden
Meaning,also The Royal Arch - Its Hidden meaning and The Lost Word - Its Hidden
Meaning. Two other very informative books about symbolism and its essential role in
freemasonry are one by Colin Dyer entitled Symbolism in Craft Freemasonry and another
by Harry Carr entitled The Freemason at Work. Finally, A New Encyclopædia of
Freemasonry by Arthur Edward Waite deals extensively with the comparable instituted
mysteries and their rites, literature and history.
Page 71 of 103
CHAPTER EIGHT - THE TRADITIONAL

DEGREES IN FREEMASONRY
Modern freemasonry has many branches and a multitude of complementary degrees
that are progressive along a variety of paths.
The Medieval Freemasons

The origins of the traditional degrees in freemasonry are to be found in the work of the
operative freemasons in medieval England. The earliest known recorded use of the word
“freemason” dates from 1376, when it implied an operative freemason of a superior class,
apparently the Master Mason in charge of a building operation, or the master builder.
Many early masonic writers did not believe medieval Master Masons possessed superior
knowledge and skill, being as well versed in religious matters, the graphic arts, sculpture
and geometry as they were in the manual aspects of their craft. One eminent writer,
A.E.Waite, could not imagine how “horny handed labourers” could develop the
symbolism and philosophy that is an essential element of speculative craft freemasonry.
Another eminent writer, R.F.Gould, proposed as a possible explanation that these
“operatives” accepted “gentlemen” into their ranks, who transformed the operative craft
into a speculative art, but he did not offer any logical reason or substantiation. Those
writers seemed unaware that freemasonry was not confined to the quarrying, shaping and
setting of stones.
Master Masons were required to understand the geometry and carry out the structural
design of the buildings, as well as having a comprehensive knowledge of the many other
constituents such as sculpture, stained glass windows and symbolic decorative work. The
medieval freemasons inherited the ideas, teachings and organisation that had crystallised as
a Fraternity, which they developed continually. From the beginnings of primitive
freemasonry during the Stone Age, the speculative art developed concurrently with the
practical skills and became an integral part of operative freemasonry, which reached its
zenith during the great cathedral building era of medieval times in England and Europe.
The freemasons used a multiplicity of emblems and had an elaborate system of symbolism
with many rites and ceremonies, which they continued to use long after the decline of
cathedral building. Manual dexterity was achieved by practical “hands on” training, while
the accompanying theory was imparted by demonstration and catechism, which included
participation in appropriate dramatic presentations to illustrate the use of the more
sophisticated implements in setting out and controlling the work. With respect to overall
control of the work for which a Master Mason was responsible when constructing a
cathedral or other ecclesiastical building, the Council of Nicea issued an edict in 797
saying “the arrangement belongs to the clergy and the execution to the artist”.
Page 72 of 103
Should there be any doubt about the intelligence, technical capacity and practical
capabilities of the medieval Master Masons, it would be instantly dispelled by a study of
the design and construction of the Chartres Cathedral in France, which is considered to be
the most authentic surviving example of the spirit of the most spiritual of all periods in
European history. In 1020 a cathedral, almost as large as the present one, replaced a
smaller church on the site. In the 1130s it was extended at the western end by adding two
bays, a vestibule and two towers that framed the Royal Portal and its renowned sculptures.
In 1194 a dreadful fire razed most of the town and all the cathedral except the crypt and the
western end. Reconstruction of the cathedral was commenced almost immediately and
continued unabated until 1230, when it was virtually complete. At the same time more than
a dozen other cathedrals were also under construction in the vicinity. In accordance with
the edict of the Council of Nicea, the clergy would have stated their requirements as to the
form of the cathedral, the size of the choir and the preferred arrangement of the chapels,
transepts and other features, but the Master Masons would have had the entire
responsibility for the design and construction. During more than thirty years while
construction was in progress, the clergy almost certainly would have requested some
innovations, but the involvement of the church and the clergy in the detailing would have
been minimal. As no architect was engaged to carry out the design or to supervise the
work, all structural problems had to be solved by the Master Mason.
The church provided clergy to check that the requirements of the church were being met. It
also was the province of the church to obtain and disburse the funds necessary to carry out
the work. Nine different Master Masons were engaged on the work cyclically throughout
the construction period, each being entirely responsible for the geometry, design and
construction of his sections of the work. In all more than thirty successive contracts or
“campaigns” were required to complete the cathedral. The first Master Mason prepared
the original design, set out the building and constructed the foundations. He was on site for
less than a year. Each of the nine contractors was engaged more than once, but the first and
some others were engaged several times. Each successive builder implemented some
modifications to the design, but without making any substantial alterations to the work
already completed. The successful completion of such a complicated and beautiful
structure, especially one for which the design and construction was carried out in a
piecemeal fashion under the control of a diverse group of master masons, proves beyond
all doubt that the intelligence, integrity and capabilities of the medieval freemasons were of
the highest order.
Medieval Lodges
The remarkable feats of building carried out by the medieval freemasons can be seen and
appreciated, but their work within their lodges and the ceremonials they used are not
immediately evident. To achieve his objectives on successive sites year after year, the
Master Mason not only had to be talented himself, but also required a talented, loyal and
dedicated team that could be relied upon to follow him in the search for and prosecution of
the work. In fact his team worked as a family, intensely proud of its skills and traditions,
but jealous of its operating methods and trade secrets. Skill, morality and fidelity were
Page 73 of 103
essential ingredients for success, but constant training also was necessary to achieve the
desired outcomes. The Master Mason was responsible for all of this training, which was a
vital activity in his lodge. His apprentices were effectively his sons for seven years and
upwards, but usually for a lifetime. All members of the Fraternity were brothers in the
truest sense.
In the early 1600s in England, it was customary to require anyone seeking an

apprenticeship in an operative lodge to stand at the entrance to the stone yard or the
construction site for two weeks, while the men were going to and coming from work, so
that the members of the lodge could appraise the suitability of the applicant and raise any
valid objection to his indentureship. If no objection was raised, the lodge’s physician
examined the applicant to ascertain his wholeness and soundness of body and limb, to
ensure that he was physically capable of carrying out the arduous work that would be
required of him. If acceptable, the applicant was balloted for by a show of hands in open
lodge. To impress upon the candidate that purity of body and mind were essential
components of his life within the Fraternity, he was required to bathe seven times
immediately before his initiation. After bathing he was made “neither naked nor clad” by
putting on a white cloak, then blindfolded and restrained by cabletows held by four of the
members who conducted him into the lodge. He was then required to kneel with both
knees bare on a rough ashlar stone and to take an obligation of fidelity, after which he
entered into a bond of indentureship for at least seven years.
The required instruction of an Apprentice was provided in three ways. The important
manual instruction was carried out either in the stone yard or on the construction site,
according to the type of his work. The theoretical instruction was usually provided within
the lodge, as was all moral instruction, for which purpose lodges were convened each
Saturday at midday. When his training was complete, an Indentured Apprentice was
formally released from his bond and regarded as a qualified craftsman. He was then
required to take an obligation as a Fellow of the Craft and was entrusted with the modes of
recognition appropriate to his status. These initial stages in the life of an operative mason
are the basis of the work in the first two degrees in modern speculative craft lodges,
although there are differences in detail. Although a Fellow of the Craft in operative
masonry was a qualified tradesman, he was required to gain further diversified experience
over many years of work while learning the specialised aspects of the trade. At each new
level of responsibility the craftsman was tested and if accepted was required to take an
obligation before being entrusted with modes of recognition appropriate to his new station,
to enable him to prove his level of competence should this be required. A tradesman of
unusual skill and ability, who had commenced his apprenticeship as a very young teenager
or perhaps even earlier, sometimes achieved the status of Master Mason by the time he was
thirty years old, but usually it took longer.
Progress in the Fraternity usually proceeded along the following lines. After many years
an experienced craftsman who had served his time as a Foreman and later as an Intendent,
might become a Superintendent of Work responsible for all of the work in a stone yard or
on a construction site. When obligated and appointed, the Superintendent was reminded
that he must have and maintain a sound knowledge of the work of the other Guilds
Page 74 of 103
engaged on the project with the masons, especially the carpenters, iron workers, bronze
founders, white smiths and gold smiths. He was also required to know all of the materials
used in the work, the required standards of workmanship, the quality of the work done, the
time required and the cost. Eventually an experienced Superintendent of Work might
assemble a gang of freemasons and become a Master Mason in his own right, often
commencing as a subcontractor to his previous Master Mason. In this way membership of
the craft of operative freemasonry expanded to meet the requirements of the times. Some
of the progressive steps that have been outlined are reflected in the degrees of modern
speculative craft freemasonry.
The Ceremonials In Medieval Lodges

The medieval lodges operated during the centuries of intense religious fervour, nearly
always working closely with or under the surveillance of a religious establishment. It was
an era of great pageantry, when church rituals became fully developed and Passion Plays
were a feature of religious life. During this period, each branch of knowledge was
considered to be a secret, which its possessors must not communicate to anyone outside
their own class or fraternity. Every art, science and trade was called a “mystery” and was
treated accordingly. Indeed, concealment was often practised as a matter of course. It was
inevitable that freemasonry would enhance its long established methods of symbolic
instruction by incorporating into its ceremonials some of the drama and ritual used by the
churches for which the building work was being carrying out. These ritualistic dramas
developed along three distinct lines. The oldest theme probably is the one referring to early
events recorded in the Book of Genesis. However the theme that is most widely known,
because it is the basis of most modern symbolic degrees, relates to the construction,
destruction and rebuilding of the temples at Jerusalem. They are commonly called the
Solomonic degrees. The third theme is different in character, beginning with the
Solomonic degrees or their equivalents and connecting them with events that occurred
during the Christian era.
The Genesis theme begins with Noah and the flood and continues with Lamech and his
four children, who are credited with the origin of civilised society. It then introduces
Nimrod, the first great builder recorded in the Bible, who constructed the tower of Babel
and is the traditional founder of operative masonry. The Genesis theme is the basis of the
first part of the “traditional history” of the operative freemasons, leading into the more
widely known theme that relates to the construction of King Solomon’s temple at
Jerusalem. The moral presented in the Genesis theme is that divine judgment is inevitable,
but that reconciliation is always available to those who repent, with whom a new covenant
will be entered into and as a consequence will be preserved. Probably the Royal Ark
Mariner is the modern symbolic degree known best in relation to the Genesis theme, but
several aspects of the theme also have a place in some of the degrees of the Ancient and
Accepted Scottish Rite.
The theme based on the construction of temple at Jerusalem by King Solomon, which was
completed in about 950 BCE, played an important role in the rituals of operative
Page 75 of 103
freemasonry and it is the foundation of modern speculative craft freemasonry. The legend
continues on from the construction of King Solomon’s temple to its destruction by
Nebuchadnezzar in 587 BCE, when the Jews were taken captive and exiled to Babylon.
The final part begins with the release of the Jews from captivity in 538 BCE under the
Decree of Cyrus, the Elamite king who captured Babylon in 539 BCE and established the
Persian Empire. The Decree of Cyrus enabled the Jews to rebuild the temple at Jerusalem
under the leadership of Zerubbabel, completing it by about 515 BCE, which completes the
theme. Although several of the degrees in this theme are related to events that occurred
after the death of King Solomon, they are commonly included as Solomonic degrees. The
instructive historical content of the degrees in this theme, as well as the symbolism
portrayed by the working tools of an operative freemason and the work they performed
during the construction of the temples, provides an ideal avenue for the “search within”,
including the search for and recovery of the “Lost Word”. The Solomonic degrees are the
basis of speculative craft freemasonry, mark masonry, the cryptic rite and royal arch
masonry. There also are Solomonic degrees in the Order of the Allied Masonic Degrees
and in the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite. The Allied Masonic Degrees will be
mentioned when appropriate in this chapter, but the degrees of the Scottish Rite are so
diverse and wide-ranging that they will be discussed in a separate chapter.
It has been suggested that the Christian elements of the theme might have arisen during the
1700s as a means of distinguishing the operative freemasons from the then “new fangled”
speculative freemasons. There is no doubt that the modes of recognition communicated in
some of the degrees in this theme were of great importance to operative freemasons when
travelling in search of work. However, the content of the degrees suggests that they had a
much earlier origin and also that recognition was not their primary purpose. In particular,
the morals that are presented teach fortitude, humility and universal equality. There are
Christian elements in two degrees of the Order of the Allied Masonic Degrees. The first of
these is called St Lawrence the Martyr, which commemorates the martyrdom of Saint
Lawrence in Rome during the third century, when he displayed humility and extreme
fortitude. The Knights of Constantinople is the other, referring to the emperor Constantine
the Great who curbed the pride and arrogance of the nobility in the fourth century and
rewarded the common people who were his loyal artisans and labourers. The virtues
portrayed in these two degrees are fundamental to the precepts of freemasonry. The theme
of the eighteenth degree of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite also has a Christian
basis, as do the degrees that comprise the Order of Rome and the Red Cross of Constantine
and the appendant Orders of the Holy Sepulchre and St John the Evangelist. There also are
the degrees of the Knights Templar that are of an historical nature and extend the theme of
service, another fundamental precept of freemasonry.
The Foundations
The traditional degrees of speculative craft freemasonry include all those derived from
earlier operative practice and several others from the transitional period in the 1600s and
1700s, thus including all of the Solomonic degrees that have been mentioned. The first two
are based on the induction of Indentured Apprentices and the making of Fellows of the
Page 76 of 103
Craft in medieval operative lodges. They are the foundation of modern speculative craft
freemasonry, which is also called symbolic masonry. It will be evident from earlier
comments that the ceremonials of these two symbolic degrees closely resemble those of
their operative precedents. There are many similarities between operative and speculative
usage in relation to the working tools and modes of recognition, but there also are some
significant differences. Some signs used by the operative masons have been omitted and
some words have been changed, but the ancient penalties are substantially the same. It is
interesting to note that the new words in speculative freemasonry, which were not used in
the operative modes of recognition, reflect the old emblematical signs that are not used in
symbolic masonry, suggesting that their choice was not a mere coincidence.
Some masonic authors have advanced the opinion that the third degree of symbolic
masonry was “manufactured” in order to fill an apparent gap, that of the Master Mason.
As we have already seen, the fully qualified and experienced craftsmen, or Fellows of the
Craft, were masters of the craft in the true sense, while the status of Master Mason usually
reflected his capacity as the manager or proprietor of a workforce operating as a lodge
within the Fraternity. Frequently the Master Mason was a contractor, who engaged and
paid the craftsmen and labourers he required to carry out the work under the terms of his
contract with the client. In its present form the degree of Master Mason includes a
significant part of the old craftsman’s instruction, known as the “five points of fellowship”
that formed a discrete and important component the Fellow of the Craft’s ritual, but
different from the “five points of fellowship” of a Master Mason. With some constructive
imagination the old Fellow of the Craft’s “five points of fellowship” were grafted onto an
ancient operative drama enacted during annual festivals of the craft. The ancient drama
highlighted the fortitude and fidelity of the master builder who had been slain and
culminated with the investment of a qualified craftsmen to replace him as one of the three
Grand Master Masons. All members of the Fraternity could attend the ancient drama,
because none of the secrets of the craft was revealed. Nowadays the symbolic degree of
Master Mason is generally regarded as an “ancient landmark”.
Of the other traditional degrees, that of Mark Master Mason is very significant because the
principles it embodies were of great importance to the operative freemasons. This degree
not only emphasises the skill and precision required of a craftsman, but it also highlights
the care that must be exercised by overseers when inspecting the work as the responsibility
for its acceptance or rejection is entirely theirs and they alone must bear the blame for any
error. In the operative context the principles enunciated in the Mark degree are ancient
indeed, although the modern “keystone” ceremony was not the only form of ritual used to
impart them. Speculative freemasons in the early 1700s were working at least seven
degrees that included the word Mark, of which some were intimately associated with the
degree of Royal Ark Mariner mentioned earlier. In the original form in which it was used
in speculative craft freemasonry, the Mark degree comprised two distinct sections, the
Mark Man for a Fellowcraft and the Mark Master for a Master Mason. In the course of
time they were consolidated into the present ceremony based on the “keystone”. The
relevant instructions given to operative freemasons were related to both the preparation and
testing of the stones and to their erection in the building. These instructions were
incorporated in the ceremonials of two degrees. Again there are some close similarities that
Page 77 of 103
clearly reflect the operative antecedents of the symbolic degree, but there also are some
significant differences.
The four symbolic degrees of Entered Apprentice, Fellowcraft, Master Mason and Mark
Master Mason complete the “work oriented” components of the old operative ceremonials
that have found their way into speculative craft freemasonry. They lay the foundation for
the esoteric theme, which is the ultimate reason for all masonic ritual. This is the search for
light and knowledge and the allegorical discovery of the “Lost Word”, which leads to the
ultimate truth. The esoteric theme is comprised in several degrees under the various
masonic orders previously mentioned, although there is no single order that includes all of
the degrees. In any particular masonic order, the sequence in which the degrees are worked
is not always in chronological order, nor is there any coherent arrangement between the
orders. There also are differences in detail between some of the equivalent degrees worked
in the various masonic orders, although their themes usually are substantially the same.
Having in mind the difficulties of communication in earlier times, the similarities of the
degrees are more remarkable than the differences.
The Solomonic Degrees

Although at first sight this group of degrees appears to represent a random collection of
unrelated incidents, a coherent narrative is achieved by arranging them in their correct
historical sequence. The following tabulation provides a summary of the complete series of
Solomonic degrees and the relevant associated degrees that relate to the first and second
temples at Jerusalem. They comprise what may be regarded as the Traditional Degrees in
Freemasonry as they are currently worked under the various masonic orders and
jurisdictions. The degrees have not been tabulated in the same sequence as they are usually
taken by candidates, but have been arranged in their chronological order. They have been
given the modern titles most commonly used. With the exception of the Entered
Apprentice and the Fellowcraft, which symbolically relate to the preliminary stages in the
construction of the temple, the dates shown are approximately those of key events referred
to in the narratives of the degrees.
1 Entered Apprentice 964 BCE Apprenticeship begins

2 Fellowcraft 957 BCE Site prepared for building
3 Mark Master Mason 957 BCE Stones shaped for secret vault
4 Select Master 956 BCE Start constructing secret vault
5 Royal Master 955 BCE Word deposited in secret vault
6 Master Mason 951 BCE Master builder slain
7 Most Excellent Master 950 BCE Dedication of the temple
8 Super Excellent Master 587 BCE Destruction of the temple
9 * Knight of the Sword 538 BCE Release from captivity
10 Excellent Master 536 BCE Return to temple site
11 Royal Arch Mason 535 BCE Word found and work stopped
12 * Knight of the East 520 BCE Zerubbabel visits Darius
13 * Kt. of the East & West 515 BCE Rebuilding completed
Page 78 of 103
The three degrees marked with an asterisk constitute the Red Cross of Babylon, also called
the Babylonish Pass in the Scottish and some other workings. In the Order of the Allied
Masonic Degrees there is an equivalent of these degrees, but the work is not identical. In
addition there are ceremonies of installation in the Craft, the Mark, the Royal and Select
Masters, the Red Cross of Babylon and also the Royal Arch, which enhance and amplify
the narrative and helps to bind it into a cohesive whole. Although the Ark Mariner is not a
Solomonic degree, but is the foundation of the Genesis theme mentioned earlier, it is
usually attached to and works in conjunction with a Mark or Red Cross lodge. It also has a
separate installation ceremony that contributes to the overall theme.
From the above summary it is evident that the narrative is woven round a series of events
recorded in the Old Testament and that the secret vault is an essential ingredient. Jewish
tradition relates that a secret vault was constructed beneath the temple, in which
confidential meetings could be held and all sacred treasures and secret documents could be
stored. The construction of such a vault under ecclesiastical and other buildings of
importance was not unusual in ancient times and the custom was continued into medieval
times when crypts were provided under most cathedrals, monasteries and castles.
Underground excavations carried out by the Knights Templar between 1118 and 1125 and
by the Royal Engineers of Britain in 1895, as well as modern seismological and
archaeological surveys carried out by the Israelis, all confirm the existence of passages and
vaulted chambers beneath the mosque now erected on the original temple site.
The First Temple

The circumstances and history of the construction of the temple at Jerusalem is well
documented in the Bible. The establishment of the work force is relevant to the masonic
theme and is recorded in 1 Kings 5:13-16 of the New English Bible in the following
words:
“King Solomon raised a forced levy from the whole of Israel amounting
to thirty thousand men. He sent them to Lebanon in monthly relays of ten
thousand, so that the men spent one month in Lebanon and two at home;
Adoniram was superintendent over the whole levy. Solomon had also
seventy thousand hauliers and eighty thousand quarrymen, apart from
the three thousand three hundred foremen in charge of the work who
superintended the labourers.”
The provision of an experienced craftsman to carry out the required designs is also referred
to in a letter from Huram King of Tyre to King Solomon, which is recorded in 2
Chronicles 2:13-14 of the New English Bible and says:
“I now send you a skilful and experienced craftsman, master Huram. He

is the son of a Danite woman, his father a Tyrian; he is an experienced
worker in gold and silver, copper and iron, stone and wood, as well as . .
Page 79 of 103
. . . who will be able to work with your own skilled craftsmen . . . . . to

any design submitted to him.”
The scene of the degree of Mark Master Mason is the stone yard, where the stones for the
temple are being prepared. The degree has two distinct parts. In the first part the candidate
represents one of the craftsmen preparing the stones. In the second part he represents one
of the 3,300 foremen who are responsible for ensuring that all the stones are properly
prepared in accordance with the working plans and that they are correctly fitted, marked
and numbered ready for erection at the site. The ritual is very dramatic. The degree teaches
that every diligent workman has a chance to distinguish himself by preparing some special
and superior piece of work that will strengthen and adorn the structure, for which he will
be appropriately rewarded provided that he has carried out the work strictly in accordance
with the Divine Plan. It would be appropriate at this point to emphasise a significant
difference between the symbolisms used in operative and speculative rituals. In the
operative rituals it is impressed upon the candidate that in each degree he represents a
particular stone in the building, which will become part of the spiritual temple above, until
ultimately the candidate represents the plan of the building itself. This important
symbolism has been omitted from the speculative rituals.
When the temple site was ready and the building stones were being prepared, twenty-seven
experienced and trustworthy craftsmen were chosen and appointed as Select Masters to
construct a secret underground vault below where the future Holy of Holies would be
located. This underground vault had a hidden access from King Solomon’s most retired
apartment. In the degree of Select Master the candidate represents Zabud, a particular
friend of King Solomon who had some important business to communicate to him, but
Zabud inadvertently entered the apartment without King Solomon’s authority. The
unworthy guard whose laxity allowed Zabud to enter without warning was condemned to
death, but he was pardoned and obligated as a Select Master. This degree warns of the
great danger of carelessness and teaches the need for constant care, uprightness and
integrity in the fulfilment of one’s allotted duties, coupled with justice and mercy. In the
Allied Masonic Degrees, the Grand Tilers of Solomon has a similar legend with interesting
variations. The degree of Intimate Secretary or Master by Curiosity in the Ancient and
Accepted Scottish Rite also has an equivalent degree.
When the secret vault was complete, the three Grand Masters deposited true copies of the
holy vessels therein, also an exact copy of the Book of the Law. It was agreed that if any
one of the three Grand Masters should die, the other two would also deposit the Word in
the secret vault so that it could be preserved and restored if the temple were destroyed. In
the degree of Royal Master the candidate represents Adoniram who, we are told in I Kings
4:16 I Kings 5:14, was the official in charge of the forced labour under King Solomon.
Adoniram is anxious to know when he might receive the master’s word, to which the third
Grand Master responds with an elegant and striking discourse, during which he
inadvertently reveals the place where the Word would be preserved. Adoniram is told that
he must continually strive in his search for truth, but that only after the temple of this life
has been destroyed by death can the temple of the life hereafter be built on its foundations.
Page 80 of 103
The temple was completed soon after the death of the third Grand Master, who was the
principal architect, as portrayed in the degree of Master Mason. When the death of the
third Grand Master had been mourned, the Ark of the Covenant was placed in the Holy of
Holies under the outspread wings of the cherubim and the other holy relics from the
tabernacle were also moved into the Holy Place. The temple was then consecrated and
dedicated in all its glory and beauty, which is portrayed in the degree of Most Excellent
Master. King Solomon then resolved to reward the most skilful of his workmen, which he
did by acknowledging them as Most Excellent Masters, thus creating a new tie with his
faithful craftsmen. This degree teaches that faithful service will be justly rewarded and that
the tenets of freemasonry should bind us together in one fraternal union. This union is
symbolised by the wavy cord depicted on some early English tracing boards. It was
knotted at the four corners and terminated in a lovers knot with the two ends of the tassel
hanging down, which should not to be confused with the four tassels. The wavy cord is an
important symbol in European lodges. Nowadays in some lodges the wavy cord and the
tassels are shown in the tessellated pavement.
The temple retained its original splendour for thirty-three years, but soon after the death of
King Solomon ten of the tribes revolted and formed the nation of Israel, leaving the temple
in the possession of the tribes of Judah and Benjamin, known as the Kingdom of Judah.
About 921 BCE Shishak, King of Egypt, raided the temple and carried away the treasures.
Thereafter idolatrous rulers desecrated the temple and allowed it to fall into decay,
although it was partially restored by Josiah around 635 BCE. The ten tribes were captured
and progressively deported into captivity in Assyria, beginning in about 722 BCE. The
temple was destroyed in 587 BCE when Nebuchadnezzar plundered Jerusalem and took
the people of Judah captive to Babylon. In the degree of Super Excellent Master, Zedekiah
the last King of Judah had already fled, leaving his people to their fate. The biblical record
tell us that he was captured by the Chaldean army on the plains of Jericho, when his eyes
were put out and he was carried into captivity bound in chains of brass. Before their
capture the loyal craftsmen, including Gedaliah who was appointed and became the wise
and gentle governor of Judea, pledged themselves to continue faithful to their trust, to be
true to their obligations and to be honourable on all occasions. The objective of the degree
is to inculcate true devotion to God, whilst at the same time we strive to enlighten our
minds and purify our hearts. The narrative is resumed towards the end of the sixty years
that the Hebrews were captive in Babylon.
The Second Temple

In 539 BCE Cyrus, King of Persia, captured Babylon. He was a great and humane ruler
who gave permission to the Hebrew captives to return to their homeland and rebuild their
temple. He issued the Decree recorded in Ezra 1:2-3 of the New English Bible which says:
“This is the word of Cyrus, King of Persia: ‘The Lord the God of heaven
has given me all the kingdoms of the earth and he himself has charged
me to build him a house at Jerusalem in Judah. To every man of his
people now among you I say, God be with him and let him go up to
Page 81 of 103
Jerusalem in Judah and rebuild the house of the Lord . . . . . And every
remaining Jew, wherever he may be living, may claim aid from his
neighbours in that place’ . . . . .”
The Decree of Cyrus is the foundation of the degree of Knight of the Sword, which takes
place in the palace at Babylon. The candidate represents Zerubbabel who was born in
Babylon, his name meaning the Exile. Zerubbabel obtained an audience with Cyrus and
requested permission to return to Judea to rebuild the temple, which was granted. Cyrus set
Zerubbabel free, appointed him chief among his brethren and exacting a tribute as evidence
to the neighbours that the returning captives were still under the protection of the King of
Persia. Cyrus issued his decree and created Zerubbabel a Knight of the Sword, investing
him with a sash and sword as the emblems of his office. It has been suggested that
Zerubbabel was the same person as Sheshbazzar, the Prince of Judah under whose
leadership the rebuilding of the temple was commenced, but the evidence suggests that
Sheshbazzar almost certainly would have been Zerubbabel’s uncle. The concluding
episode of degree relates to Zerubbabel’s hazardous return to Jerusalem, and includes the
ancient drama of “crossing the bridge”.
As the Decree of Cyrus applied only to the descendents of the captives from the Kingdom
of Judah, it was necessary to make sure that only they were returning to Jerusalem to work
on the temple. So that the craftsmen working on the temple could be identified easily,
Zerubbabel decided to institute a new degree, called Excellent Master, founded on the
history and traditions of their ancestors. This was especially significant, because it related
their new release to their previous release from Egyptian bondage, when the Lord called
Moses from his exile to lead the Chosen People out of captivity, as well as to their travels
in the years that followed. The portions of Scripture selected for this degree, as well as the
modes of recognition adopted, relate to those visions in which God gave to Moses certain
signs by which the people would know that he came with Divine authority. Relevant
aspects of the symbolism of the Tabernacle, which God commanded Moses to institute
during the wanderings of the Israelites after the Exodus from Egypt, also receive attention.
However, they are neither the basis of the degree nor its principal component. Tradition
says that the degree was conferred on the craftsmen before they left Babylon, when they
pledged themselves to serve God, their brethren and their chosen leaders. They also were
enjoined to journey through life with humility and to render to God that honour and praise
which are most justly due to Him. The degree is commonly called Passing the Veils. There
is no English equivalent of the Scottish form of this degree in regular use, but variations of
Passing the Veils are incorporated in some workings the Royal Arch degree as an essential
preamble. An equivalent of the degree is also worked in some Irish chapters of the Royal
Arch.
The records show that about 42,360 of the remnant of the Jews in exile returned to
Jerusalem progressively, the first contingent under the leadership of Zerubbabel in 535
BCE, followed by Ezra in 458 BCE and finally Nehemiah in 445 BCE. In the traditional
Scottish degree three exiles from Babylon, having received the tokens of an Excellent
Master and wishing to take advantage of the Decree of Cyrus and assist in rebuilding the
temple, present themselves to the Sanhedrin on their arrival. They are engaged
Page 82 of 103
immediately and begin clearing away the rubbish from the first temple, which is the setting
for the Royal Arch degree. The three workmen detect a hollow sound when digging at the
site of the previous Holy of Holies. On further investigation, after removing the keystone,
they discover the secret vault. Gaining access through the opening, they safely recover the
items previously deposited. Thus the Word was restored and the degree of Royal Arch
Mason was established. The candidate represents one of the workmen who made the
discovery and was rewarded by exaltation as a Royal Arch Mason. The candidate receives
several lectures on the historical, philosophical and mystical aspects of the degree, which
are intended to impress upon him that freemasonry is that great and universal science
which includes almost every other, but that more particularly freemasonry teaches us our
duty to God and to our neighbour and a knowledge of ourselves.
Shortly after the work of reconstruction had commenced, the Samaritans in the
surrounding areas sought to join in the work, but were told that they were not among those
who had the right to build. Thereafter the Samaritans harassed the builders and also
enlisted the support of Tattenai, the Persian governor of Samaria. Cyrus died in 530 BCE
and Artaxerxes usurped the throne for a brief period. In the year 522 BCE, by which time
the site had been surveyed, the foundations laid and the walls commenced for the second
temple, Artaxerxes stopped the rebuilding of the temple at the instigation of the
Samaritans. Tattenai and another Persian officer of rank, Shethar-boznai, went to
Jerusalem and sent a fair report to Darius, the new King of Persia, suggesting that a search
should be instituted to learn whether construction of the temple was being carried out in
accordance with a royal decree. At the request of the Sanhedrin, Zerubbabel also went to
Babylon in 522 BCE, where he attended the King’s court and made a personal plea to
Darius while Tattenai’s report was being considered.
During his visit to Babylon, Zerubbabel was asked to participate in a debate in the Persian
court on questions posed by Darius, who asked which was the strongest of wine, the king
or women. Zerubbabel convinced Darius that women were the strongest of those three, but
that truth was stronger than all things, which is the moral taught in this degree. The story of
this debate in the Persian court and also its outcome are recorded in I Esdras 3-4. In
summary, Darius accepted Zerubbabel as his Kinsman who would sit by him, then said
that he would be happy to grant Zerubbabel’s requests, even beyond what was in writing.
Zerubbabel’s statements concerning the rebuilding of the temple were verified by the
discovery of the original decree, in the personal records of Cyrus that had been held in the
castle at Ecbatana in the province of Media. Darius issued a written confirmation of the
Decree of Cyrus and gave instructions that the rebuilding was to be given every support
and that no taxes should be levied. Tattenai and his colleagues thenceforth applied
themselves with vigour to execute the royal commands. All of these events are recorded in
the Scriptures.
Because of his high regard for Zerubbabel, Darius constituted Zerubbabel as a Knight of
the East before his return to Jerusalem. Darius also gave Zerubbabel all of the temple
treasures not previously recovered. These events also feature in the Ancient and Accepted
Scottish Rite, where they are the central theme of the degree of Prince of Jerusalem. The
rebuilding of the temple was recommenced in 520 BCE and completed by Joshua in about
Page 83 of 103
516 BCE, without any further problems from the Samaritans. As a reward for Zerubbabel’s
services, including his successful approach to Darius that resulted in the recovery of the
temple treasures and his work on the rebuilding of the temple, the Sanhedrin constituted
Zerubbabel as a Knight of the East and West, the highest masonic honour the Sanhedrin
could bestow. This degree teaches that integrity and fortitude, coupled with wisdom like
that displayed by Zerubbabel when answering Darius’s questions, are all essential masonic
attributes.
The Allied Masonic Degrees

Two of the Allied Masonic Degrees have already been mentioned briefly in the context of
their Christian connection, namely St Lawrence the Martyr and the Knights of
Constantinople. These two degrees and the Grand Tilers of Solomon, mentioned earlier in
relation to the degree of Select Master, typify the method of communicating moral
instruction in medieval operative lodges. All are brief and to the point, so that the message
can be understood easily by the youngest apprentice. In St Lawrence the Martyr the
candidate is told that the degree was of great value to the operative masons, although the
reason only becomes evident during the ceremonial of installing a master. Another
important degree, in effect a Masonic Order of Knighthood, is the Red Cross of Babylon,
which recounts the story of the Knight of the Sword and Knight of the East and West as
outlined in the preceding section. The “crossing of the bridge” is an important episode in
both variations of the story, when the candidate must cross the River Jordan. It is a
symbolic journey of great significance in worldwide religions, derived from ancient
folklore. Traditionally the soul must cross the “river of death” on its journey to rejoin its
creator. In the Knight of the Sword the journey is made in the traditional direction from
east to west during the return to Jerusalem, but in the Red Cross of Babylon it is made on
the outward journey to Babylon. In both variations the characteristic colour is green, an
emblem of immortality.
To conclude this summary of the Allied Masonic Degrees, it is important not to overlook
the Holy Order of Grand High Priest. The country and year of origin of this degree are not
known, but it might have descended from the “High Grades” worked on the Continent of
Europe during the 1700s. It has much in common with various other Melchizedek degrees
and orders, including the French version of the Holy Royal Arch Knight Templar Priest,
which have been worked in the English-speaking world without interruption since the
second half of the 1700s. The modern degree probably amalgamates two older degrees,
because the story jumps four centuries from when Abram from Mesopotamia was blessed
in Canaan by Melchizedek, the King of Salem and Priest of the Most High God, to when
Aaron the Levite was anointed as the first Jewish High Priest. The name Melchizedek
means “King of Righteousness” and Salem means “peace”. The colours are white and a
fiery red, emblems of harmony, devotion and zeal.
The Colours And Symbolism Of The Regalia
Page 84 of 103
Important aspects of the symbolism that is a fundamental element in all branches of

freemasonry are discussed in some detail in the second part of this book, but some
comments on the regalia and symbolism of the traditional degrees would be appropriate
now. Although aprons are worn in speculative Craft Lodges, in Mark Lodges and in Royal
Arch Chapters, they are not always worn in the other degrees. Sometimes only the jewel of
the degree is worn, even though in earlier times there may have been an apron for the
degree. In some jurisdictions, for example, the apron and sash of the Royal Arch Chapter
are often worn when working in the Cryptic Council or Lodge and Council, together with a
jewel appropriate to the degree. Although there are aprons for some of the degrees worked
in the Order of the Allied Masonic Degrees, nowadays only the jewels of the degrees are
worn. The following comments are not exhaustive, because although the fundamental
concepts are similar in all jurisdictions there are many variations from one jurisdiction to
another.
The pure white lambskin of an Entered Apprentice’s apron is a universal emblem. The
addition of two blue rosettes for a Fellowcraft Freemason is well known, but the custom is
not universal. Likewise the addition of a third blue rosette to signify a Master Mason will
be familiar to most. White is the symbol of purity and innocence and blue denotes
universal friendship and benevolence. In a Mark Lodge the customary jewel is the
keystone of an arch and the colours are light blue coupled with red, which is as a symbol of
fervency and zeal. Aprons and sashes in the Royal Arch usually incorporate an
intermeshing design of red and deep blue triangles or lozenges, which have the same
symbolism. In addition, the intermeshed triangles on the apron symbolise action and
reaction combining to achieve the desired result, while the intermeshed triangles and
lozenges on the sash symbolise the border of the temple and also the bonding of the
companions in God’s service. In contrast, Royal Arch aprons and sashes in the Irish
jurisdiction do not incorporate blue, while the sash is worn over the right shoulder instead
of the left as in most jurisdictions. A jewel commonly used in the Royal Arch comprises
two interlaced equilateral triangles, forming a star of six points, also called the Shield of
David.
The work and symbolism portrayed in the degrees of the Cryptic Council are a synthesis of
the fundamental teachings of pure ancient freemasonry. Black, red and purple are all
significant colours, but purple is the characteristic colour as a symbol of royalty because
Solomon King of Israel, Hiram King of Tyre and Hiram Abif, the chief builder during the
construction of the temple at Jerusalem, are key figures in the narrative. The principal
jewels are the equilateral triangle as an emblem of God, coupled with the trowel
symbolising the spirit of devotion and self-sacrifice that should unite all freemasons in the
bonds of brotherly love and affection. In the Scottish jurisdiction the working apron of a
Royal Master is a black triangle with a red border. The black alludes to the grief of the
craft for the loss of the chief builder and the red alludes to the blood he shed in defence of
his integrity. In the Select Master nine white five-pointed stars are added to the apron,
arranged as triangles in each of the three corners of the apron, together with the Hebrew
characters Yod Samech in white in the centre. The black of the apron in this degree alludes
to secrecy and silence and the red to fervency and zeal. The nine stars are important. On
Page 85 of 103
the physical plane they allude to the nine arches in the secret vault, but five-pointed stars
also allude to the application of the mental faculties of man. Nine white stars signify
perfection and completeness and when arranged in triangles pointing upwards they indicate
that the faculties of man are being employed in God’s service. The Hebrew characters
typify the degree because they signify “man of my choice”.
In the English jurisdiction a triangular white apron with crimson and gold borders is worn
in all degrees of the Cryptic Council and the jewel is a hollow white equilateral triangle
surmounted by a crown and suspended from a crimson ribbon. The important teachings of
the Cryptic Council culminate in the work and symbolism of the degree of Super Excellent
Master. The apron is black edged with red as in the Select Master, with similar symbolism,
but there is a silver sword in the centre instead of the Hebrew characters and the nine stars.
The silver sword is the Sword of Truth, emblematic of true devotion in spirit and in truth
to the Great I AM, which is an important moral inculcated in this degree. It also reminds
us of the Flaming Sword that God placed at the east of the Garden of Eden, which turned
every way to uphold the way of the Tree of Life. The work of the degree is exemplified by
the formation of various geometric figures by twelve members who represent the tribes of
Israel. In this respect the Super Excellent Master is similar to the Sublime Prince of the
Royal Secret in the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite. The principal tenets of
freemasonry are exemplified in this part of the work in the Super Excellent Master, so a
brief explanation of the ceremonial will be given.
The exemplification begins with a square, the first emblem in freemasonry, formed around
the altar to represent an encampment of the Israelites protecting the Ark of the Covenant in
the centre. The standard of the eastern division, led by the tribe of Judah, depicts a lion as a
symbol of strength and power. The standard of the southern division, led by the tribe of
Reuben, depicts a man as a symbol of reason and religion. The standard of the western
division, led by the tribe of Ephraim, depicts and ox as a symbol of patience and labour.
The standard of the northern division, led by the tribe of Dan, depicts an eagle as a symbol
of wisdom and sublimity. This was the traditional order in which the tribes of Israel set
forth during their journeys through the wilderness. The exemplification continues with a
triangle, the second emblem in freemasonry, formed around the altar as an emblem of the
Deity. The three sides typify the Divine attributes of Omnipotence, Omniscience and
Omnipresence. The triangle is also a symbol of the three principal masonic supports of
Wisdom, Strength and Beauty; the three masonic graces of Faith, Hope and Charity; and
finally the triple duty that every freemason owes to God, to his neighbour and to himself.
The exemplification concludes with a circle formed around the altar to represent the third
emblem of freemasonry, the point within a circle from which a freemason must not err.
The circle is an emblem of eternity, which inspires us to cherish the hope of immortality by
having faith in the Divine providence of Him who is the Soul and Centre of the Universe.
The Operative Free Masons

The rituals used in the degrees of the ancient craft of operative free masonry and the
dramas performed at their annual assemblages and on other special occasions are the basis
Page 86 of 103
of the rituals used in modern speculative craft freemasonry. In 1913 the old lodges of
operative free masons still extant in England were becoming inactive, as a result of which
the remaining members feared that their ancient rituals and ceremonials might be lost.
Accordingly those lodges decided to amalgamate in the formation of The Worshipful
Society of Free Masons, Rough Masons, Wallers, Slaters, Paviors, Plaisterers and
Bricklayers, now commonly referred to as “The Operatives”. The minimum qualifications
required for entry are those of Master Mason, Mark Master Mason and Royal Arch Mason,
but only those who have been installed in the chairs of the Craft lodge and also the Mark
lodge are permitted to advance beyond the fifth degree. There are seven degrees in the
Society, the titles and relevant jewels of which are as follows:
I° Indentured Apprentice -
Blue neck cord.
II° Fellow of the Craft -

Square gauge with a blue neck cord.
III° Super-Fellow, Fitter & Marker -

Running stone gauge with a blue neck cord.
IV° Super-Fellow, Setter Erector -

Footing corner stone gauge with a blue neck cord.
V° Intendent, Overseer, Superintendent and Warden –

Elbow square gauge with a blue collarette.
VI° Passed Master –

Silver gallows square with a blue collarette.
VII° Master Mason and Grand Master Honoris Causa –

Gold gallows square with a blue collarette.
The ancient drama accompanying the appointing a new Grand Master Mason is the core
element of the modern degree of Master Mason. Traditionally the operative free masons
annually re-enacted the dedication of King Solomon’s temple, which is still used in the
Society as its dedication ceremony.
Other Orders
The degrees of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite reviewed in the next chapter, with
those of this chapter, are only a few of the several hundred once worked, most of which
disappeared during the 1800s. Several other unrelated Orders, like the Knight Templar
Priests and the Societas Rosicruciana, have not been described. However the following
summaries have been included because the Orders have something in common with the
Solomonic degrees.
Page 87 of 103
The ritual of the Royal Order of Scotland is in doggerel verse arranged in the old
catechistic form that was customary in the ancient St John’s lodges in Scotland. It has a
strong Christian element, but aspects of the Royal Arch and Cryptic degrees are present as
well as elements of other degrees. Heredom of Kilwinning is the first degree, followed by
the Knight of the Rosy Cross. The ritual interconnects the Old Testament with the New
Testament and culminates with the doctrines inculcated by the life and death of Jesus. The
characteristic colours are thistle green and crimson. In this Order green is an emblem of
Scotland, but it also is a symbol of loyalty, wisdom, rebirth and immortality. Crimson
alludes to sacrifice and the willingness to shed one’s own blood in a just and righteous
cause, but it is also a symbol of devotion, fervency and zeal.
The Masonic and Military Order of Rome and the Red Cross of Constantine and appendant
Orders of Knights of the Holy Sepulchre and of St John the Evangelist also connect the
teachings of the Old and New Testaments. The narrative alludes to the founding of
freemasonry by our ancient brethren, based on instructions received from Moses, Solomon
and Zerubbabel. It continues in some detail from the rebuilding of the second temple to the
death of Christ on the cross and the destruction of the temple by the Romans. The Knight
of St John the Evangelist is the Christian element of the Palestine Order of St John.
Ultimately the pillars of the New Law are discovered, which leads to the recovery of the
True Word. The vision that the Emperor Constantine saw in the sky and his conversion,
leading to the establishment of the Christian religion in Rome, also are recounted. Black,
white and purple are the characteristic colours, with the usual symbolism.
The Religious, Military and Masonic Order of the Temple, including the Knights of Malta
and of St John of Jerusalem, unites the teachings of two Orders that originally were
militant rivals. The narrative recounts the establishment of the Knights of the Temple at
Jerusalem under the leadership of Hugo de Payens and Godfrey de St Omer in 1118 and its
history until their persecution by King Philip of France and Pope Clement V, when
hundreds were tortured and burnt at the stake, including their Grand Master Jacques de
Molay on 11th March 1314. The Order inculcates in freemasons the holy, charitable and
honourable purposes of the original knights and hospitallers as Soldiers and Servants of the
Cross. The rituals also have a mystical aspect in relation to resurrection. The characteristic
colours are white, red and black, with the usual symbolic meanings.
Page 88 of 103
CHAPTER NINE – THE PILGRIMAGE AND

SYMBOLISM OF THE ANCIENT AND
ACCEPTED SCOTTISH RITE
Progress through the degrees of the Scottish Rite is a pilgrimage that imparts moral and
spiritual instruction for the proper conduct of life.
Introduction
In the Mysteries of most of the ancient religions, the candidate’s participation was a
mystical journey, as it is in each degree in freemasonry, the destination revealing the
ultimate purpose of the degree. By definition a pilgrimage is an actual or allegorical
journey to visit a holy place or a place venerated for its associations, which is often
regarded as the journey of a lifetime. The candidate’s journeys through the various degrees
of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite, commonly referred to as the Scottish Rite, also
constitute a symbolic pilgrimage that is intended to impart important moral and spiritual
instruction for the proper conduct of life. Although not identical in all jurisdictions, the
thirty-three degrees of the Scottish Rite usually differ only in their details between
jurisdictions. As these differences generally are not of a fundamental nature, they are of no
real consequence when considering the mystical journeys in which the candidate
participates. The degrees may be considered under the following seven groups, which
should be familiar to all members of the Scottish Rite irrespective of the jurisdiction to
which they belong:
1. The Craft Lodge or Preparatory Degrees – 1° to 3°.

2. The Lodge of Perfection – 4° to 14°
3. The Council of Princes of Jerusalem – 15° and 16°.
4. The Sovereign Chapter of Princes Rose Croix – 17° and 18°.
5. The Sovereign Council of Knights of Kadosh – 19° to 30° of which -
a. 19° to 25° are Philosophical;
b. 26° to 28° is a Search for Truth;
c. 29° is Moralistic; and
d. 30° is Consecration as Knight Kadosh.
6. The Consistory – 31° and 32°; and finally
7. Sovereign Grand Inspector General – 33°.
In about 1740 Christian masonic orders began to emerge in France, claiming to be a direct
continuation of the Knights Templar. As many of the degrees had a Scottish title and
Traditional History, they were designated Ecossais. In 1758 an organisation in Paris, called
“The Emperors of the East and West” established a series of twenty-five Ecossais
degrees and called it the Rite of Perfection. The rite spread quickly to the West Indies as a
Page 89 of 103
result of trade with France and it reached the mainland of North America in 1767. Statutes
and Constitutions were issued in 1786 extending the Rite of Perfection to thirty-three
degrees. They included seven degrees from other sources randomly interspersed between
the 18° or Sovereign Prince Rose Croix and the 25° or Knight of the Royal Secret, also
called Knight of St Andrew and Faithful Guardian of the Sacred Treasure or Knight of
the White and Black Eagle. Thus the original 25° became the 32° and an additional
degree, primarily of an administrative nature, was added and called the 33° or Sovereign
Grand Inspector General. The formal establishment of the first Supreme Council of the
rite at Charleston, South Carolina, followed in 1801. It recognised the extension of the rite
and completed the transition by changing its name to The Ancient and Accepted Scottish
Rite.
The candidate’s pilgrimage through the Scottish Rite and the symbolism that is reflected in
the work of the degrees will now be reviewed. As the scope of the degrees is wide and
varied, only their salient aspects will be considered and the important elements of their
symbolism explained in enough detail for the purpose of the pilgrimage to be appreciated.
The regalia and colours associated with the degrees will also be discussed in relation to
their symbolism, but not exhaustively because there are many differences in detail between
jurisdictions. Those differences will not be mentioned unless they are of special
significance in the context of the journey. With regard to each degree, it is important to
keep in mind the several basic elements that apply to every journey, so that the real
purpose of the pilgrimage can be fully appreciated. These basic elements of each journey
are the participant’s labour, observation, contemplation, education and lastly the proper
application of the wisdom acquired during the journey.
The Craft Lodge or Preparatory Degrees

The original craft degrees practised in the Scottish Rite were the French degrees of
Apprentice, Companion and Master, which are similar to the degrees still being worked in
speculative craft freemasonry. The several Supreme Councils that control the Scottish Rite
agreed long ago that they would not work the first three degrees, except for demonstration
purposes, but would accept as their equivalents the speculative craft degrees of Entered
Apprentice, Fellow Craft and Master Mason received under a recognised Grand Lodge.
However, it is worth noting some differences from the work of the degrees as they are
carried out under some Grand Lodges. In particular the Apprentice is required to spend an
extended period in a room of contemplation, lit only by a candle, where he has to prepare
answers to a series of questions for the approval of the brethren before he may be admitted
as a candidate. Also, the journey of an Apprentice is more physically challenging than that
required of a candidate in speculative craft lodges under most jurisdictions, because the
candidate is required to overcome various obstacles and to submit to various trials of his
fortitude.
The Companion receives instruction on an important symbol that is rarely seen in English
craft lodges nowadays, “la pierre cubique a pointe”, a cubical stone crowned with a
pyramid. It featured on early English tracing boards and was called a broached thurnel.
Page 90 of 103
The Companion’s special attention is drawn to the Greek Cross that has four equal arms
and signifies eternity; the Tau Cross, which signifies that the spirit is ascendant in the
individual; and the Ankh Cross, which symbolises the life-transforming nature of faith. He
is also told that, in addition to its well-known interpretations, the G in the centre of the
building represents knowledge, from the Greek word gnosis. The Master is instructed in
the usual Hiramic legend, but the work of the degree is longer and more dramatic than
under most craft Grand Lodges. The degree concentrates on a philosophical contemplation
of the soul of man and its return to heaven. In all three degrees the apron is white with a
narrow blue border, signifying purity and friendly union. The apron has long blue tapes
that are passed around the waist and tied in front under the flap, with the ends left hanging
down, reminiscent of the wavy cord enclosing some early tracing boards in the first degree,
that was knotted at the four corners and terminated with its two tasselled ends hanging
down. It still appears surrounding some tessellated pavements as a reminder that the bonds
uniting freemasons should draw them together. Apprentices wear the apron with the flap
turned up, while Companions wear it with the flap turned down and a corner turned up.
Completion of the craft degrees proves that the candidate has the desire and the fortitude
required to continue his pilgrimage.
The Lodge of Perfection

These degrees continue the story of King Solomon’s temple until Jerusalem was destroyed
and the temple sacked by Nebuchadnezzar in 587 BCE. They reflect similar stories enacted
in other degrees of freemasonry, many of which are referred to as the Solomonic Degrees.
Although not exactly the same, some degrees of the Mark Lodge, the Royal Arch Chapter,
the Cryptic Council, the Lodge and Council and the Allied Masonic Degrees are similar to
or their themes run parallel with some of those worked in the Scottish Rite. Most of the
degrees comprised in the aforementioned branches of freemasonry constitute the main
stem of what is called the York Rite in the United States of America, connecting the
speculative craft degrees with the Knights Templar. They are often referred to as the
traditional degrees in freemasonry and are the subject of the previous chapter in this book.
Members of those orders will recognise many topics that are summarised in the following
discussion on the degrees of the Scottish Rite, which are considered in groups of degrees
that have interrelated topics.
The 4° or Secret Master teaches secrecy, obedience and fidelity. Its primary colours are
black and white, with the usual symbolic meanings, but the flap of the apron is blue and
has an irradiated golden All-seeing Eye in the centre, alluding to the heavens and the ever-
present Deity. This degree begins the philosophical and moral lessons of equilibrium,
which is a central theme in the Scottish Rite. The 5° or Perfect Master symbolically re-
enacts the funeral of the master builder, Hiram Abif, often referred to as the third Grand
Master at the building of King Solomon’s temple in Jerusalem. Traditionally a reenactment
of the death of the master builder was carried out annually, when a qualified master was
selected to represent him for the ensuing year. This custom is still followed by the
Operative Free Masons. In this degree the lining, flap and border of the apron and also the
sash or cordon are green, symbolising joy and the spring of rebirth after death, contrasting
Page 91 of 103
with the sorrow associated with the previous degree. The 6°, called Intimate Secretary or
Master by Curiosity, relates to the unheralded entry of King Hiram into King Solomon’s
private chambers, when he discovers someone whom he thinks is an intruder. Solomon’s
wisdom prevails and he judiciously heals the differences between the several parties. The
apron is white emblematic of purity and edged with crimson emblematic of zeal. The
letters B, N and S are on the apron in the form a triangle, with the letters JH in the centre,
all in Phoenician characters. The letters that form a triangle signify Berith, Neder and
Shelomoth, signifying Covenant, Vow and Perfection, while those in the centre spell Jah.
In the 7° or Provost and Judge, the candidate is entrusted with the ivory key to an ebony
casket, which holds the plans of the temple when not in use, together with the records of
the judgments and decisions of King Solomon’s tribunal. Ivory and ebony are white and
black, symbolic of equilibrium and justice, also symbolised by the emblem embroidered on
the flap of the apron, which is the hand of justice holding the scales of judgment. This
degree teaches that every action, dream, virtue or vice committed by an individual
becomes part of the plan of his temple, even though they might not be apparent to others.
The colours are white and red, the emblems of innocence and guiltless blood. In the 8°,
called Intendant of the Building or Master in Israel, the white apron and flap are edged in
green and the collar is red, respectively emblematic of purity, zeal and hope for the future.
Labour is the central theme of this degree, in which the candidate is told that real progress
can only be made with the aid of study, that important undertakings can only be carried out
with cooperative effort and that knowledge will be lost unless carefully preserved and
passed on to others.
The 9°, 10° and 11° form a trilogy intended to impress upon the candidate that self-
discipline is a vital characteristic. The degrees are Master Elect of Nine, Illustrious
Master Elect of Fifteen and Sublime Knight also called Knight Elect or Sublime Prince
Elect. The 9° and 10° relate to the search for and bringing to justice of the ruffians who
slew the master builder. The 11° culminates with the reward of the faithful workers
through initiation into higher service. The three degrees respectively teach service and
obedience to superiors, emphasise the need for subordination to the common task and
demonstrate that only those who have learned to subjugate themselves can properly
exercise authority over others. These degrees are called Elu of Nine, Elu of Fifteen and
Elu of Twelve in the United States of America. In all three degrees the aprons are white,
edged with black and black sashes also are worn.
The aprons of the 10° and 11° also have black fringes. In Hebrew, Phoenician and other
traditions fringes are a symbol representing spirituality and dedication to things that relate
to the spirit. In these degrees black features as a symbol of sorrow for the ignorance,
tyranny and intolerance that freemasons are pledged to overcome. The sash in the 9° is
adorned with nine red rosettes as emblems of the special virtues emphasised in the degree,
which are courtesy, devotion, firmness, impartiality, frankness, generosity, self-denial,
heroism and patriotism. The apron and sash in the 10° are both adorned with three red
rosettes. The smaller rosettes on the apron represent the three ruffians who symbolise
ignorance, tyranny and fanaticism, while the larger ones on the sash symbolise that the
candidate has overcome those perils. The candidate receives his reward in the 11° as a
Page 92 of 103
member of the Elect of Fifteen, each of whom has the characteristic name and title of
Nasia Ameth, the two Hebrew words Nun Samech Yod and Aleph Mem Tau that
respectively mean Prince and Truth. In both of these degrees a dagger or poniard appears
as a jewel, as a symbol of the two-edged Sword of Truth with which every freemason
should be armed.
The 12° or Grand Master Architect relates to the period immediately after the dedication
of King Solomon’s temple. The theme changes from the teaching of pure morality to the
introduction of philosophical considerations. In this context it extends the moral instruction
imparted in the speculative craft degrees, but does not refer to the manual working tools of
the operative freemason used as emblems in those degrees. Instead it contemplates
instruments used for calculation and creation, such as the plain scale employed to measure
dimensions, the sector or hinged scale used in computations, the protractor used to measure
and set out angles on a plan, the parallel rule and the several types of dividers and
compasses. These instruments represent measurement, computation and creativeness,
respectively symbolising justice, wisdom and the spirit of God. As might be expected, the
apron and flap are white edged with blue and the sash is blue, with the same symbolism as
in speculative craft freemasonry. The apron is fringed with gold as an emblem of
spirituality enhanced by the active forces of nature. The jewel of the degree is suspended
from the sash and has seven sides. It portrays an equilateral triangle of three circular arcs in
the centre and has a five-pointed star in each corner. The degree relates to the
establishment of a school of architecture and emphasises the study of geometry.
The 13°, called the Royal Arch or the Royal Arch of Enoch, relates to a search instituted
by King Solomon to find a secret vault that was hidden under the ruins of an ancient
temple that the patriarch Enoch built before the flood. In an alternative working the degree
is called the Royal Arch of Solomon and it relates how, during the building of King
Solomon’s temple, three workmen discovered the vaults that had been constructed by
Enoch. Both narratives are similar in many respects to that relating to the preparations
made by Zerubbabel to rebuild the temple at Jerusalem. Nine subterranean vaults were
found under the ruins and thereafter they were referred to as the Sacred Vault. A golden
Delta that had been deposited by Enoch also was recovered from the ruins. It was engraved
with the Tetragrammaton, the Sacred and Ineffable Name of the Deity, thus providing a
clue to the true meaning and pronunciation of the Word. The apron is crimson, which is
red tinged with blue, symbolising spiritual zeal. The sash is purple, a mixture of red and
blue, which symbolises the spirit, has an element of zeal and also alludes to royalty. The
degree teaches that our quest for the unknown must be prosecuted with zeal and imbued
with spirituality, continuing without end as we draw closer to the Deity in heart, mind and
spirit.
The 14°, or Grand Scottish Knight of the Sacred Vault, is also known as the Grand Elect
Perfect and Sublime Master in England and as Perfect Elu in the United States of
America. It meets in the Sacred Vault, where the candidate is required to prove himself in
all the preceding degrees, after which he is accepted as having reached Perfection in
Ancient Masonry. The candidate is told that after King Solomon had completed the temple
he transgressed in the sight of the Lord and that later, when the children of Israel followed
Page 93 of 103
his example, Nebuchadnezzar had destroyed the temple as a punishment for their sins. As a
reward for his zeal and devoted service in the Lord’s name, the candidate is entrusted with
the original Word of a Master Mason and is instructed in its correct pronunciation. The
apron and flap are white, edged with blue and lined with red, with the usual symbolism.
The collar is crimson symbolising spiritual zeal and it is decorated with a sprig of acacia on
the wearer’s left, symbolising immortality. On the right of the collar is a silver or gold
five-pointed star, in which the Phoenician word for perfection is displayed.
The Council of Princes of Jerusalem

The 15° is called the Knight of the East or of the Sword. It relates to Zerubbabel when he
appeared before Cyrus the King of Babylon and requested permission to return to
Jerusalem to rebuild the temple. When Cyrus agreed to Zerubbabel’s request he issued a
decree to end the captivity of the Israelites and ordered that the sacred vessels of the temple
should be returned to them. This degree is the beginning of the second part of the old Rite
of Perfection, which was called Modern Masonry. The apron and flap are red, edged with
green and decorated with three concentric equilateral triangles of chain that are reminders
of the enemies of human intellect, namely tyranny, privilege and superstition, which are
counteracted by liberty, fraternity and equality, represented by the three solid concentric
triangles on the jewel. A green sash and a green collar that is edged and fringed in gold
also are worn, representing the transcendent nature of freemasonry and symbolising the
immortality of the human soul. The emblems of the degree also include a trowel and
crossed swords, as a reminder that liberty and independence must be fought for constantly.
They also allude to the legend that the operative freemasons found it necessary to work
with a trowel in one hand and a sword in the other when rebuilding the temple at
Jerusalem.
The 16° or Prince of Jerusalem begins in Jerusalem with Zerubbabal sitting in Council
with the Knights of the East, because work on the second temple had been brought to a
standstill by the ceaseless attacks of the Samaritans. Five of the Knights were selected and
sent on a mission to Darius, who had succeeded Cyrus as King of Persia, to request him to
enforce the Decree of Cyrus by ordering the Samaritans to cease their attacks. They also
asked Darius to assist them with the supply of materials for construction of the temple.
During their visit to the court of Darius the Knights took part in the discussions on the
classical riddle recorded in I Esdras 3 and 4, to decide “Which is stronger, wine, women or
the king?” When Zerubbabel concluded the discussion, saying that Truth is strongest of all
and gave his reasons, their request was granted. When the Knights returned to Jerusalem
their reward was to be created as Princes of Jerusalem. In an alternative working it is
Darius who creates Zerubbabel as a Prince of Jerusalem, to reward his wisdom and to
enhance his authority by elevating him to the same level as the Prince-Governors of the
other provinces beyond the River Jordan.
In the 16° the apron and flap are red, edged with gold, symbolising the zeal of the Knights
in their pursuit of justice and the loftiness of their purpose. A silver trowel is suspended
from a golden sash, emblematic of the nobility of labour. A Hand of Justice, holding the
Page 94 of 103
Scales of Judgment, is depicted on the flap and on the jewel. The Scales of Judgment are
also depicted on the sash, with a hand holding the Sword of Righteousness immediately
above them. There are two crowns on the sash, one on each side of the Scales of Justice,
signifying the separable functions of civil and religious authority. On the body of the apron
are the Phoenician letter corresponding to the Greek letter Alpha as a symbol of God and
the Greek letter Theta as a symbol of judgement, for which purpose it was used in court by
the ancient Greeks to signify the sentence of death. This degree continues the message that
liberty must be fought for without remission whilst labouring for the benefit of mankind.
The Sovereign Chapter of Princes Rose Croix

The 17° or Knight of the East and West unites the work of Ancient Masonry with that of
the Modern Masonry, which commenced in the 15°, foreshadowing the work of the 18°.
The Crusaders, when seeking to establish the Christian faith and the worship of the True
God at Jerusalem, were reminded of the work of Zerubbabel and the Knights of the East
who erected the second temple at Jerusalem. The work of the degree relates to the breaking
of the Seven Seals of the Book of Revelation. The apron and flap are both triangular as a
symbol of the Deity. Their colour is gold in allusion to the dawn of a new era and the
edges are red as an emblem of faith and zeal. Two sashes are worn, one of black from the
left or weaker shoulder to the right hip and the other of white from the right or stronger
shoulder to the left hip, white over black. Light and knowledge is symbolised by the white
sash, which prevails over the darkness and ignorance symbolised by the black sash. This
also alludes to duality and the balance of nature, symbolising equilibrium. The two sashes
form a Cross of St Andrew, which is an ancient symbol for change or transformation and
also alludes to crucifixion. The apron is decorated with a Tetractys of ten Yods, the first
Hebrew letter of the Tetragrammaton. The triangular shape of the Tetractys represents
God and the ten Yods represent the ten Sephiroth or manifestations of God that constitute
the Tree of Life referred to in the Cabalah and symbolising God’s creation and
preservation of the universe.
The 18° Sovereign Prince Rose Croix, or Knight of the Eagle and the Pelican, is the
story of a descendant of the princes and rulers in Israel who is wandering aimlessly after
the destruction of Herod’s temple by the Romans, seeking the enlightenment of the New
Law. During his wanderings in a state of darkness and despair he discovers the three pillars
of Faith, Hope and Charity, which relieve his despair and will thenceforth be his guide. In
the Chamber of Darkness that represents a world lost in sin and despair, he catches a
glimmer of the light of the True Word and is thus encouraged to continue his search.
Ultimately his search is rewarded in the Joyful Chamber that represents a world
enlightened by the Saviour of mankind, where the True Word springs forth in all its
splendour. The regalia of the degree comprise an apron and a collar from which the jewel
is suspended. All items of the regalia are reversible, having a dark side and a bright side.
The dark side of the apron is a badge of mourning that is worn when the Word was lost,
while the bright side is a badge of rejoicing that is worn when the Word has been found.
Entry into this degree represents a transformation by entering into the third or Spiritual
and Moral Temple that Christ established at Jerusalem. In this context it is important to
Page 95 of 103
realise that Herod’s temple was not the third temple, but an expansion of the second temple
built by Zerubbabel.
The dark side of the apron and collar is black or a dull purple, on which a red Latin or
passion cross is raised on three steps, all edged in gold. The bright side of the apron and
flap are white, edged in crimson and the bright side of the collar is crimson. The emblems
on the apron and collar vary between jurisdictions, but they always include representations
of a Latin cross and a pelican feeding its young. Traditional Scottish aprons have a rounded
flap and body, but others have a triangular flap and rectangular body. The flap of the apron
usually is adorned with a rayed golden triangle that encloses either the Tetragrammaton in
Hebrew or an All-seeing Eye, emblematic of Almighty God. The jewel is a pair of
compasses opened 60° on an arc. On the side worn in the Joyful Chamber the compasses
enclose a pelican feeding its young, which alludes to devotion and self-sacrifice. On the
other side is a silver eagle, which alludes to wisdom and intelligence. A red rose at the
hinge of the compasses on the side with the pelican alludes to the Saviour and a silver rose
on the other side to His ascension. A seven-pointed crown surmounts the jewel, to remind
us of the sovereignty of the people and their right of self-determination, as well as to
emphasise that a freemason of the highest rank is only the first among his equals.
The Philosophic Degrees of the Sovereign Council

The 19° or Grand Pontiff, sometimes called Sublime Scottish Knight, teaches that
ignorance and sin must be combated with the assistance of the help that comes from above,
complementing the teachings of the 16° and 17°. In this degree pontiff is used in its
original sense of bridge builder, which is its primary theme. An important element of the
regalia is a crimson sash edged in white, symbolising zeal and purity. The sash is decorated
with a line of twelve golden stars, separated midway by the Greek letters Alpha and
Omega. The jewel suspended from the sash is a rectangular gold plate, engraved with the
Hebrew characters Aleph the Tau on the obverse and reverse sides respectively. Both of
these inscriptions, the Greek Alpha and Omega and the Hebrew Alpha and Tau, signify
the first and the last and the beginning and the end, thus representing the full cycle of
existence, or totality. The twelve stars have several meanings, which include an allusion to
the Zodiac and the twelve tribes of Israel, as well as the twelve gates of the New Jerusalem
and the twelve fruits of the Tree of Life depicted on the tracing board. The degree
emphasises that sin and indifference must be fought with zeal and purity of the heart, to
build a better world.
The 20° or Venerable Grand Master, also called Master of the Symbolic Lodge, has a
traditional history that seeks to link the builders of Herod’s temple with the Knights
Templar, who settled at Kilwinning after escaping from the Inquisition in France in 1314
and established the Scottish Rite in Scotland. The apron and flap are yellow, edged with
sky blue and the sash has equal bands of yellow and blue, emblematic of a new birth and
friendly union. The apron and jewel display three concentric equilateral triangles that have
a cross in the centre formed by the intersection of two inscriptions. The bar of the cross is a
Tetragrammaton, written in Phoenician characters because Hiram’s birthplace was
Page 96 of 103
Phoenicia. The Hebrew words Yod He Yod and Aleph Waw Resh written upwards form
the upright of the cross, which is yehi aur or let there be light. The central theme of the
degree is that we must control our own destiny with the help of God.
The 21° called Noachite or Prussian Knight is an unusual degree that relates the story of
Phaleg, the chief architect of the Tower of Babel, who spent his closing years after the
destruction of the tower repenting in exile in a triangular shrine. The apron and flap are
yellow and the sash is black. The yellow alludes to a new dawning resulting from the part
played by Noah in the preservation of the antediluvian arts and sciences and its
transmission to those who followed. The black alludes to sorrow for the causes of the
destruction of the tower. On the flap is displayed an Arm of Justice holding a naked sword
ready to strike. On the body of the apron is the Egyptian figure of secrecy and silence, a
winged human figure with the forefinger of the right hand to the lips. The jewel also
depicts the Arm of Justice with the Latin words Fiat justitia, ruat coelum in an arc above
them, signifying Let there be justice, though the heavens fall.
The 22° called Prince of Libanus, or Knight of the Royal Axe, teaches that labour is a
privilege that is dignified and noble of itself, neither a punishment nor a curse. The work of
the degree begins as a meeting being held in the workshop of a timber yard on Mount
Lebanon, where Colleges had been established for the improvement of forestry and the
practice of benevolence and other social virtues. King Solomon had established settlements
of workers there after the dedication of the first temple and their descendants had supplied
timber for the second temple. The work continues as a round-table conference in the Inner
Council of one of the Colleges concerned with the supervision of morals and the science of
measurements, proportions and dimensions. The apron and flap are white edged with
purple, the sash is rainbow coloured and the jewel is a golden axe. A round table is
depicted on the apron with mathematical instruments and plans resting on it. The white
apron signifies purity of purpose, while the purple edges signify spiritual zeal. The
mathematical instruments, plans and golden axe combine to emphasise the nobility of
labour. The rainbow sash is lined with purple, which is a symbol of hope for the future
reinforced by spiritual zeal.
The 23° or Chief of the Tabernacle teaches that, in the fullness of time and when
necessary in a good cause, the successor of a deceased worker will come forward and
continue the fight against evil. The candidate represents the son of Hiram Abif, the master
builder who was slain before completion of the first temple at Jerusalem. Hiram Abif’s son
enters the tabernacle after a long delay and offers up the sacrifice that had been made every
day since King Solomon made the first offering of thanks for the retribution that had been
inflicted on the assassins. After making his offering, the candidate is told that he must
constantly seek out and eliminate envy, folly and cowardice. The apron and sash are white,
bordered with red, blue and purple, the colours used to decorate the interior of the
tabernacle. A representation of a golden menorah, or seven-branched candlestick, is
depicted on the apron to remind the wearer that he must always bear witness to the light, as
we are told in John 1:8-9, which says “he came to bear witness to the light – the real light
that enlightens every man”.
Page 97 of 103
The 24° called Prince of the Tabernacle is highly mystical, but it conveys the simple
underlying message that we should seek inspiration from the universe that surrounds us,
because simple faith is wiser than vain philosophy. It is a curious story beginning when the
altar of the temple is overthrown, false gods invade the holy place and King Solomon
strays from righteousness. The setting suddenly changes to the idyllic state in the Garden
of Eden before the fall of man, to which state all should aspire. The message of the degree
is emphasised by the apron of white lambskin, which is edged with light green and lined
with scarlet, symbolising fervency in the pursuit of that purity of life that will lead to
spring and a rebirth. The sky blue flap is adorned with a myrtle tree, emblematic of
immortality. The scarlet sash is adorned with a golden scarab beetle, a winged globe and a
butterfly, all emblems of rebirth. A Phoenician Aleph is suspended from a violet collarette,
which also symbolises beginning and rebirth.
The 25° or Knight of the Brazen Serpent teaches that life and liberty can only be enjoyed
through cooperation with our fellow men, which is demonstrated to the candidate by his
inability to ascend Mount Sinai, representing the Hill of Virtue, until the chains in which
he is bound have been removed at the instigation of others. The story is illustrated by the
recovery from mortal agony of all those present when the candidate passes them holding
aloft a staff bearing the serpent he found on top of the mountain. The serpent alludes to the
all-healing herb that Moses is reputed to have found on Mount Sinai, when he saw a
serpent applying the herb to a wounded mate. The apron and flap are white, edged and
lined with black. The white side of the apron is adorned with golden stars representing the
Pleiades and it also has a rayed equilateral triangle with the Tetragrammaton in
Phoenician characters in the centre, to remind us that our help is in God. On the flap is a
symbol called an Ouroboros, a serpent coiled in a circle with its tail in its mouth,
symbolising time and eternity and also alluding to the great cycles of time in which we
live. A crimson sash is worn from the left shoulder to the right hip and over it a white sash
from the right shoulder to the left hip, as a reminder that purity must always prevail in our
zealous pursuits. As in the 17° the sashes form a Cross of St Andrew, an ancient symbol
for change or transformation that also alludes to crucifixion. A crimson collar is worn,
from which an Ankh Cross is suspended. The upright arm of the cross has the words “he
has suffered” engraved in Hebrew and the crossbar has Nehushtan in Hebrew characters,
the name given in 2 Kings 18:4 for the brazen serpent Moses set up on a pole, said to be in
the form of an Ankh Cross, which Moses did at God’s command after interceding with
God on behalf of the people. The loop of the Ankh Cross has a serpent coiled around it,
symbolising healing and spiritual grace.
The Search for Truth in the Sovereign Council

The 26° called Prince of Mercy, or Scottish Trinitarian, emphasises that there are three
progressive stages by which Truth can be determined. They are a literal interpretation, a
figurative interpretation and a hieratic or spiritual interpretation. The apron is scarlet,
edged in white and the flap is purple, signifying devotion, purity and spiritual zeal. The
sash is green, white and red, which respectively symbolise the infinite wisdom of the
Deity, the unlimited power of the Deity and divine harmony. The apron and jewel depict
Page 98 of 103
the triune aspects of the Deity by an equilateral triangle, which signifies that the Wisdom,
Strength and Beauty of the Deity is absolute, that the Creative, Preservative and
Destructive power of the Deity is infinite and that the Father, Son and Holy Ghost
comprise three inseparable elements of the Deity. Within each of the triangles there is a
flaming heart, engraved with the letters IHS, which is another important symbol of the
degree. The letters IHS have been assigned various interpretations, including Iesus
Hominum Salvator, meaning Jesus Saviour of Man; and In Hoc Signo, meaning In This
Sign; and also Imperium, Harmonia, Sapientia, meaning Power, Harmony and Wisdom.
The 27° or Sovereign Commander of the Temple continues the search for Truth. The
moral of the candidate’s journey is reminiscent of that posed by the classical riddle in the
16°. The candidate travels under difficulties with his hands bound and is faced with three
great temptations. They are a life with sensual pleasure, but without faith; a life based on
the practical and economic realities of the world, but without any spiritual component; and
lastly a life based solely on spiritual values, but without any true human content. The
candidate overcomes these three temptations while journeying from the west to the east,
where he encounters and wins a final battle, which demonstrates that Truth must always
prevail. His hands are then unbound and he is crowned with laurel as a token of his
courage and perseverance in his search for truth. The apron is scarlet edged in black,
emblematic of the candidate’s zeal and determination in overcoming the sorrow, death and
martyrdom represented by his trials. It is adorned with a laurel wreath enclosing a key, as a
reward for the honour and valour displayed during the trials. The collar is white edged with
scarlet, emblematic of the candidate’s zeal and purity of purpose. It is decorated with two
gold Teutonic Crosses and the jewel suspended from it also is a Teutonic Cross. The jewel
is a black cross potent (meaning that there is a crossbar at the end of each arm) that is
charged with a gold cross potent and surcharged with a white escutcheon bearing a black
double-headed eagle. The Holy Roman Emperor, Henry VI (1165-1197), first assigned the
simple badge to the Teutonic Knights. John King of Jerusalem added the gold cross and
the Holy Roman Emperor, Frederick II (1194-1250), added the escutcheon to complete the
emblem.
The Teutonic Cross is an emblem in the chivalric degrees of the Scottish Rite in the
United States of America, where the 27° is usually regarded as the first of those chivalric
degrees. In most other jurisdictions the red Cross Pattée or Templar Cross with four arms,
each an equilateral triangle, which was given to the Knights Templar by Pope Eugenius III
in about 1146, is the cross usually adopted as the emblem of the chivalric degrees. The
well-known Maltese Cross is closely associated with the Templar Cross. It also is a Cross
Pattée, but the external side of each triangle is deeply indented so as to form eight sharp
points instead of the 60° points of the Templar Cross. This cross is the emblem of the
Knights of Malta and is white when displayed on their black tunic. The eight points are
said to allude to the eight beatitudes named in Matthew 5:3-11. The reason why the
Teutonic Cross has been adopted as a chivalric emblem in some jurisdictions probably
relates to the persecution of the Knights Templar during the Inquisition in the fourteenth
century. It is well known that many of the Knights Templar escaped with their ships to
Scotland. It is believed that many also escaped to Germany and Prussia, where they
received the protection of their friends and confederates, the Teutonic Knights. As the
Page 99 of 103
original chivalric degrees of the Scottish Rite had their origins in the “Cross of Christian
Encampment” of France and the “Observance” of Germany, it is not surprising to find
that the Teutonic Cross was adopted as an emblem.
The 28° called Knight of the Sun, or Prince Adept, encourages us to seek Truth through
Philosophy and to subjugate our passions. The journey begins with ordeals in a gloomy
vault, followed by trials while passing through subsequent apartments that progressively
become lighter. In the fourth apartment, which is brilliantly lit by the Sun of Philosophy,
the candidate is required to express his own views on moral philosophy before he receives
a Dictum of Philosophy that he must make his future guide. The apron and collar are
white. The apron has a plain white flap and the body is adorned with an open pentacle,
which is defined by red edges and has an All-seeing Eye in the centre. The collar is also
adorned with an All-seeing Eye on the wearer’s right hand side. The jewel is an open
golden pentacle suspended from a gold coloured collarette. The pentacle is an emblem of
mankind, whilst white and gold represent the purity of life that we should seek continually.
The Moralistic Teachings of the Sovereign Council

The 29° or Grand Scottish Knight of St Andrew of Scotland is the culmination of true
Ecossais Masonry, leading into the Chivalric or Templar Degrees. The obligation
emphasises the teachings of this form of freemasonry, which are chastity, the rejection of
unworthy associates, the worship of God, avoidance of evil speech, care of the sick and
needy, hospitality, obedience to all lawful authority, the study of nature and finally the
humble service of mankind. The ceremony is based on the rendition of a traditional history
that traces the imaginary development of the Scottish Rite from the time Herod’s temple in
Jerusalem was destroyed by Pompey the Great, through the period of the Crusades, until
their refuge in Scotland after they had assisted Robert the Bruce, King of Scots, at the
Battle of Bannockburn. Prince Charles Edward Stuart is said to have introduced the
Scottish Rite into France from Scotland. In the 29° a white sash with gold fringes is worn
from the left shoulder to the right hip. The collar is green edged with crimson, from which
the jewel is suspended. The jewel is a golden Cross of St Andrew with a large emerald at
the centre. The cross supports a knight’s helmet above and a thistle below, both in gold.
The banner of the degree is white with a gold fringe at the lower edge and it is adorned
with a green Cross of St Andrew, surmounted by a thistle surrounded by five stars all in
gold. The emerald signifies manly virtue and strength by its colour and purity by the clarity
of the stone. The thistle and the cross are emblems of Scotland. The helmet is an emblem
of knighthood. The white of the regalia signifies purity of purpose, the crimson symbolises
spiritual zeal and the green alludes to the eternal life of the spirit. The degree emphasises
the qualities of knighthood, especially those of the Knights Templar, usually described in
three ascending groups of three, which are: humility, patience and self-denial; charity,
clemency and generosity; and virtue, truth and honour.
Consecration as Knight Kadosh
Page 100 of 103

The 30° or Grand Elect Knight Kadosh, which sometimes is referred to under the title of
Knight of the Black and White Eagle, is the culminating degree in the Council series.
Although closely related to the Knights Templar, the work of the degree not the same. It is
the first of the three Chivalric or Templar Degrees in most jurisdictions, but see the 27° in
relation to the United States of America. The degree has had a chequered history. In its
original form it was directly concerned with retribution for the suppression of the Knights
Templar in the fourteenth century during the Inquisition and also retribution for the
afflictions that the Knights Templar suffered through the cruelty, fanaticism, superstition
and greed of their oppressors. A central theme of the original degree was revenge for the
burning at the stake of the Grand Master, Jacques de Molay, which accounts for the modes
of recognition and some of the terminology now used. In the closing years of the
eighteenth century the ceremony was re-written in its present form as a purely
philosophical degree. The real journey now commences in the Chamber of Reflection and
continues in the Hall of Judges. If the candidate shows sufficient determination to
continue his journey he proceeds to the Chamber of Dedication, then must return to the
Hall of Judges for final examination before admission into the Council Chamber where
he receives a lecture on the Mysterious Ladder. The lecture first explains the moral basis
on which the labours of the degree are founded and then outlines how their teachings
should be applied on a material and intellectual basis. The central lesson taught is that a
Knight Kadosh must always be ready to sacrifice himself in promoting the Divine
Kingdom of Justice and Mercy on Earth. The title Kadosh is a Hebrew word signifying
separated to the service of God, in which sense it also means consecrated.
The regalia of the degree comprise a black sash edged with silver and having a silver fringe
at the end, worn from the left shoulder to the right hip, together with a jewel that is a
double headed eagle with a poniard in its talons. The sash is decorated with two crimson
Templar Crosses edged with gold and also the banners of the Knights Templar supported
on crossed staffs, testifying to the origins of the degree. Above the upper Templar Cross a
large double-headed eagle with a poniard in its talons is mounted in silver bullion, which
in turn has a red lined jewelled crown with nine points above it. Also depicted on the sash
are the Mysterious Ladder, an intertwined three-headed snake and the Letters KH. It is
sometimes said that the letters K and H represent two Hebrew words meaning “House of
the Temple”, but this does not appear to be incorrect having regard to the fact that the
Hebrew word for temple is He Yod Kaph Lamedh or Hekhal and that Beth Yod Tau or
Beth is the word for house. Probably K and H are the first and last letters of the English
word Kadosh, because the Hebrew word for Kadosh is spelt Qoph Daleth Shin. The
symbolism of the colours of the sash is twofold – mourning for the deceased Knights
Templar and also secrecy. The double-headed eagle is a symbol of sovereignty and
intelligence and also of balance or equilibrium. The crown signifies authority and
judgement.
The Work of the Consistory
Page 101 of 103

The degrees of the Consistory complete the triad of Chivalric Degrees and also
consummate the pilgrimage of the Scottish Rite. A consistory is a place of assemblage and
also the assemblage itself, including a spiritual or ecclesiastical court, which originally was
the privy council of the Roman emperor. This is the capacity of a Consistory in the
Scottish Rite and is the reason why it is also referred to as the Consultative Council. In
practice the three Chivalric Degrees bring the pilgrim to the completion of the Third or
Spiritual Temple. The labours of instruction are completed and the only work remaining is
constantly to put into practice the virtues that have been exhorted throughout the
pilgrimage. The 30° or Grand Elect Knight Kadosh could be regarded as the operative
component of the Chivalric Degrees, which requires the Consecrated Knight to set
himself aside and go forth in battle to promote the divine kingdom of justice and mercy on
earth. The Consistory has two complementary degrees, the 31° or Grand Inspector
Inquisitor Commander representing judicial activities and the 32° or Sublime Prince of
the Royal Secret representing military activities, two facets of government that are
diametrically opposed and must be kept separate and distinct in all well-ordered societies.
In the 31° or Grand Inspector Inquisitor Commander the work constitutes a philosophical
journey, during which the candidate receives a series of lectures recounting the works,
opinions and judgements given by six of the greatest sages, lawgivers and philosophers of
antiquity renowned for their discernment and wisdom, whose example every man should
use as a guide for his own conduct. It is impressed upon the candidate that the office of
Judge is both arduous and responsible, that all human judgement is uncertain and that the
only infallible Judge is the True God. He is also told that no man should seek to judge his
fellowmen, but if judgement cannot be avoided honourably it is a duty and a task that must
be performed. The characteristic colour is white, signifying harmony and justice. In the
Council Room ten lights are arranged in the triangular form of a Tetractys, a symbol used
by Pythagoras that he is believed to have learned when he visited Babylon. It is an emblem
of the Tetragrammaton and Pythagoras explained the four rows of points thus. The one
point at the apex of the triangle is a symbol of the Active Principle or Creator; the two
points represent the Passive Principle or Matter; the three points represent the world
proceeding from their union; and the four points at the base represent the liberal arts and
sciences, thus completing and perfecting that world. The central moral is that Justice is
Equity and must be dispensed with Gentleness and Compassion. On the white collar are
two red Maltese Crosses, the Scales of Justice and two wavy Swords of Truth that cannot
be sheathed.
It was mentioned earlier that the 32° or Sublime Prince of the Royal Secret originally was
the 25° of the Rite of Perfection, a symbolic pilgrimage woven around an encampment of
Knights Templar. The Knights Templar set up assemblages called Encampments, often
called Commanderies or Preceptories. The Tracing Board in the Rite of Perfection was a
plan of the Encampment and it is still the central emblem on the collar of the 32°. The
Encampment is symbolical and arranged as five concentric geometric figures, all of which
have the usual significations. The perimeter is a nonagon, with a flag at each of the nine
angles and a tent and pennon at the midpoint of each side, representing members of the
degrees from the first to the eighteenth. Within the nonagon is a heptagonal fence. It
encloses a pentagon, with a standard at each angle representing members of the degrees
Page 102 of 103

from the nineteenth to the thirtieth. Within the pentagon is an equilateral triangle, within
the angles of which the members of the Consistory are camped, with any Knights of Malta
who have proved themselves true and faithful and have been received. A circle inside the
triangle has the tent of the Sovereign Grand Inspector General at the centre. The circle
originally enclosed a red Templar Cross with five arms, but nowadays it is a Cross of St
Andrew. In the Rite of Perfection the Christian element of the degree was that part of the
Palestine Order of St John now appended to the order of Rome and the Red Cross of
Constantine as the Knights of St John the Evangelist. It relates to the final hours of the
Messiah on the Cross of Calvary, explaining how the degree of Master Mason reflects the
agonies suffered by the Messiah and that the Word is a substitute for those the Messiah
uttered on the cross. The collar is black edged with silver. Black is a symbol of mourning
for the Knights Templar who were mercilessly slain during the Inquisition, but it also
signifies sorrow for the crucifixion of the Messiah and is a reminder of that darkness
beyond the veil from whence the True Word will become manifest. The silver edging is a
symbol of hope. Also on the collar are Maltese Crosses and other emblems illustrating the
pedigree and purpose of the degree.
The 33° or Sovereign Grand Inspector General is the paramount administrative degree of
the Rite, but in the United States of America it is also conferred as an honour in
recognition of service. The sash is white, a symbol of purity that also alludes to the soul or
spirit. In this degree white indicates the purity of purpose required of every leader and
ruler. The jewel incorporates three interlaced equilateral triangles forming a nine-pointed
star as a symbol of Divine Truth and the nine points represent the Latin word
SAPIENTIA meaning WISDOM. The mottos set out in the Statutes and Constitutions of
1786 are Deus Meumque Jus, or God is my Right together with Ordo ab Chao, or Order
out of Chaos.
END of Volume 1 ‘The Square And Compasses’ by Don Falconer -
Page 103 of 103

Falconer Don The Square and Compasses - Volume 1 (PDF)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Falconer Don The Square and Compasses - Volume 1 (PDF)

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Falconer Don The Square and Compasses - Volume 1 (PDF)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

The Square and Compasses Volume 1 – by Donald H. B.

THE SQUARE AND COMPASSES

Craft: PM, PDGDC, Scottish Constitution,

Royal Arch: PZ, PDGDC,

Cryptic Council: PTIM,

Lodge & Council: PWCN, PMEC,

Allied Masonic Degrees:

Holy Royal Arch Knight Templar Priests:

Ancient & Accepted Scottish Rite:

Previously also a long-term member of the following Orders:

Contrary to a hypothesis sometimes put forward, speculative freemasonry is not a recent

CHAPTER ONE – THE ORIGIN

The Earliest Freemasons

The Development Of Literacy

CHAPTER TWO – FREEMASONRY AND

The Rise Of Civilisation

In 47 BCE Julius Caesar appointed Antipater, a Jew of Idumaean descent, as procurator of

Modern Freemasonry Emerges

The Templar Influence

Other Influences On Freemasonry

course of freemasonry directly or indirectly. Among the more tenuous possible

A comprehensive outline of the evolution of freemasonry, which illustrates its close

CHAPTER THREE - THE LEGACY OF

Masonry Through The Ages

The gradual development of settlements in Mesopotamia, Greece, Crete and Cyprus

The Freemason And His Lodge

English Operative Lodges

Scottish Operative Lodges

Irish Operative Lodges

Early “Non-Operative” Masons

Early Speculative Lodges

opening address, the “commencements harrangue”, given in 1688 at Trinity College in

The “Mason Word”

Preparation of the candidate in operative practice included bathing and examination by a

The lectures given to English medieval stonemasons usually included a mythological

The Missing Stones

CHAPTER FOUR – HISTORY, A KEY

The Ancient Charges In Summary

The Liberal Arts And Sciences

The Foundation Of The Crafts

The Two Pillars

Nimrod And The Tower Of Babel

The Call Of Abraham

The Temple At Jerusalem

“Then Solomon began to build the house of the Lord in Jerusalem on

St Albans is the successor of the important Roman-British town of Verulamium, which

CHAPTER FIVE – SPECULATIVE CRAFT

Christopher Wren’s masterpiece, St Paul’s Cathedral reconstructed from 1675 to 1707,

of the operative lodges progressively became speculative lodges. A significant event

Modern Speculative Craft Freemasonry

The Purpose Of Freemasonry

It would be difficult to find a more comprehensive and enlightening discourse on the

“Masonry might first of all be regarded as a school of ethical training. It

“Masonry is also a training school in cooperative and fraternal work. It

“From another angle we might look upon speculative Masonry as

CHAPTER SIX – THE PRECEPTS OF

The First Principle

freemasonry, because it is only a factor of his upbringing or a matter of personal choice,

Behaviour And Responsibility