FEM - Sync Week 1
FEM - Sync Week 1
Synchronous classes of
Finite Element Method
19EMEC301
3. FEA analysis:
Pascal triangle, shape functions (1D, 2D, LST, CST, Quad, Higher order elements), Stiffness matrix and
08
its properties. Elimination approach, Penalty approach and Thermal effect based practical engineering
problems.
4. Advanced FEA analysis:
Multi-point constraint, Iso-parametric and Axi-symmetric elements. Practical aspects of industrial 07
machine components, Field issues related to structural applications using higher order polynomials.
Unit - 3
100% Accurate Results Approximate, Assumptions Made Time Consuming , Needs expensive setup
Applicable only for Simple problems like Applicable to real life complicated problems Applicable only if physical prototype is
Cantilever , simply supported beams and available
Cylinders etc..
Complete in itself Results can not be believed blindly and Results can not be believed blindly and
must be verified by experimental methods Minimum 2 or more prototypes must be
and Hand Calculations. tested.
Although applicable to simple shaped Finite Element Method: Linear , Nonlinear , -Strain Gauge
geometries only , Analytical methods are Buckling , Thermal, Dynamics & Fatigue - Photo elasticity
considered as Closed form solutions i.e. analysis - Vibration measurement (accelerometers)
100% Accurate Boundary Element Method: Acoustics / - Sensors for Temp & pressure etc…
NVH analysis - Fatigue test
Finite Volume Method: CFD
(Computational Fluid Dynamics) &
Computational Electromagnetic
Finite Difference Method: Thermal & Fluid
Flow analysis (in combination with FVM)
Different Numerical Methods
Is it possible to use all the above listed methods (FEA ,BEM , FVM, FDM)
to solve same problem (say Cantilever problem)?
Answer : YES ! But the difference is in Accuracy achieved , programming ease and time
required to obtain the solution
History of FEM
• 1940 Basic idea of FEA developed by Aerospace engineers using matrix method
• 1943 variational method by Courant
• 1945 Hrennikoff (field of structural engineering)
• 1947 Levy introduced force method
• 1953 Levy (stiffness method)
• 1954 Argyris and Kesley (Metrix structural analysis)
• 1956 Turner,Clough, Martin,Topper (Stiffness method)
• 1960 Clough ( Finite element, plane problems)
• 1961 Turner( large deflection thermal problems)
• 1965 NASTRAN developed
• 1968 Zinkiewicz ( Visco elasticity problems)
• 1977 Alberto peano developed fiesta a P-code software
• 1982 Probe, a First industrial software implemented by Barna Szabo and Kent myers
• 1987 Mechanica developed by Rasna corp.
• 2001 A. Duster proved P version code is most efficient in plasticity
• 2006 ASME guide for V&V for computational solid mechanics released
• 2008 NASA released standard for models and simulations
• 2012 Barna Szabo and Ricordo Actis introduced simulation goverance
• 2013 Simscale officially released cloud based 3D simulation
FEM Philosophy …in layman terms
If one need to evaluate the perimeter of a circle without using the conventional
formula (2*pi*r), FEA approach is analogous to Dividing the circle into a number of
segments and joining the points using Straight lines
Since it is very easy to measure the length of straight line. Measure the length of
one line and multiply it by No. of lines to get the perimeter.
Approximate results….isn’t it ?
It is very well proven , tested and validated method for simulating any complex
practical scenario in the area of Structural ,Thermal ,Vibration etc..
Are FEA and FEM different ?
Finite Element Analysis (FEA) and Finite Element Method (FEM) both are
one & the same.
• Aerospace Domain
• Automotive Domain
Practical Applications of FEA
• Hi-Tech /Electronics
• Medical Devices
Practical Applications of FEA
• Cost
• Design Cycle time
• No. of Prototypes
• Testing
• Design Optimization
Total work potential of a body
A) Body forces : These forces are acting on every element of the body .
Unit is N / mm3 .
Example: weight , magnetic force, centrifugal force, inertia force.
Stress at point
Point is a body in which all dimensions dx, dy, dz
are tending to zero
Stress acting on each positive plane can be divided in to 3
components σxx , σyy, σzz are called Normal
X plane : σxx , τxy , τxz components
Y plane: σyy , τyx , τyz τxy , τxz , τyx , τyz ,τzx , τzy are
called Shear components
Z plane: σzz , τzx , τzy
All these components arranged in matrix form is called as
Stress tensor at pont ( i,j)
Welcome to
Synchronous classes of
Finite Element Method
19EMEC301
Stress vector is ,
E= young‟modulus
B) Trigonometric function:
3. Formation of the element stiffness matrix:
This is the process of finding elemental stiffness matrix for
each element . (ke )
[ k ] [Q] = [F]
dimensions [mXm] [mX1]=[mX1]
8. Incorporation of boundary conditions:
All known values in the problem are filled in these matrices
to reduce the number of unknown. The known values will be
in the form of inputs. Finally
The number of simultaneous equations = no. of unknowns
9. Calculations of unknown nodal displacements.
Solving the simultaneous equations gives unknown values
in the form of nodal displacements.
10 Calculation of strain and stresses: Nodal stress / strains and
global stress / strain can be find out by using these
displacements
Total Potential Energy in the body
Week 1-chunk 7- video Week 1-chunk 8- video Week 1-chunk 9&10 -video
• Limitations of FEM • Applications of MPE • Methods to use MPE
•Steps in Rayleigh-Ritz
• Problems
Limitations of FEM software
1. Maximum Data storage : The calculations in FEM are carried out in
matrices which include a large data set. And in each iterations the
variables are to be stored in the memory. This requires a large
memory in RAM as well as Hard disk. A good configuration computer
is necessary which cost more.
2. Error of approximation: All numerical methods are based on
approximation. This approximation introduced because of assuming
continuum object in to finite elements, assuming a interpolation
function, Selecting a suitable element for the given shape of the object
etc. There is limit kept for this error.
For pristine materials error < 5%
For Composite materials error <20%
3. Time consuming:
The meshing involve discretization of the continuum. The quality of the
mesh decides the error in the solution. If fine meshing opted for less
error, it needs lot of time. If it contains many iterations , the design
process becomes tedious.
F
Consider a Bar with axial load F
In classic mechanics
A,E, L
δ = PL/AE = FL / AE
F
δ = F / (AE/L) = F/K
L+δl
F
In MPE method
Total PE = Strain energy + Work Potential
= ½ (K ) (x2) - F . X
(- ve sign because work done on the material)
Under minima condition First derivative will be equated to zero
MPE = d (½ (K ) (x2) - F . X ) = 0
dx
K x –F = 0 Hence x= F/K = δ
Hence MPE method can be applied to linear displacement problems
Using MPE , Two methods are formulated
1. An variational method known as Rayleigh-Ritz method
2. A weighted residual method known as Galerkin‟s method
Rayleigh-Ritz method
In this method , an approximate solution of the following type is
assumed for the field variable.
This yield „n‟ equations with „n‟ number of inknown „ai and fi „ soling
those equations we get unknown values
General steps for Rayleigh-Ritz method
4. Minimize PE functional
5. Determination of displacement ,strain and stress
substituting the value of a1 in previous equation
hence prooved