Iep Case Study
Iep Case Study
Iep Case Study
__________________SCHOOL SYSTEM
INDIVIDUALIZED EDUCATION PROGRAM (IEP)
IEP Meeting Date: 1/07/15 Purpose of IEP Meeting : Initial Annual Review Amendment
Student Name: Hans Asperger Date of Birth: GTID#
Eligibility Category(s): Speech Impairment in receptive language and Most Recent Eligibility Date(s): Hans received a re-evaluation on 12/10/14
Autism
School: Grade: 7th School Year: 2015
Parent(s):
Address: Email:
Phone (home): (work): (cell phone):
Parent: Name/Title:
The WASI-II subtest scores are T scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. WASI-II index and IQ scores are standard
scores with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15.
Subtests:
Hans attained high scores on the WASI-II subtests that tend to be most sensitive to inattention and impulsive responding.
Similarities T score = 27; PR = 1 – below average
Indices:
Verbal Comprehension Index: SS = 73; PR = 4 – below average
FULL SCALE IQ: SS = 103; PR = 58% of individuals in the normative population scored equal to or less than Hans.
Two of Hans’s teachers completed the Conners-3
Hans had elevated scores on the scales assessing inattention, hyperactivity/ impulsivity, and problems in learning and executive
functioning.
The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule – Second Edition (ADOS-2) is a standardized assessment of communication, social
interaction, and play or imaginative use of materials to diagnose a child with Autism Spectrum Disorder. The ADOS-2 uses ratings
that range from 0 (no abnormality) to 2 (markedly abnormal), based upon the comparison of social affect and restricted/repetitive
score relative to a cited cut-off score.
Hans’s results indicated that reciprocal social communication skills were less developed than most students his age due to unusual
visual behavior squinting and tendency to miss “big picture” information while focusing on specific details.
The Gilliam Autism Rating Scale – Third Edition (GARS-3) is a teacher/parent rating scale. Hans’s parents’ responses which resulted in
an Autism Index score of 63 (<1st percentile rank), which fell in the range associated with a possible autism spectrum disorder. The
teacher’s responses yielded an Autism Index score of 86 (18 th percentile rank) suggested the likelihood of autism spectrum disorder.
The Childhood Autism Rating Scale, Second Edition – High-Functioning Version (CARS2-HF) is a rating scale used to assess children who
have been referred because of possible Autism Spectrum Disorders or other Pervasive Developmental Disorders.
A child with mild-to-moderate symptoms of autism spectrum disorder is expected to attain a T-score between 42 and 50, and Hans’s
results were a Total Raw Score of 32.5 (T-score = 49), showing that Hans is “mildly to moderately” impaired in 8 of the 15 CARS2-HF
categories: Social-Emotional Understanding, Emotional Expression and Regulation of Emotions, Object Use in Play, Verbal
Communication, Nonverbal Communication, Thinking/ Cognitive Integration Skills, Intellectual Response, and General Impressions.
Hans is also “mildly” impaired in 3 out of 15 categories: Relating to People, Adaptation to Change/ Restricted Interests, and Visual
Response.
Hans’s pattern of behavior appeared consistent with Autism Spectrum Disorder according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of
Mental Disorders – 5th Edition (DSM-5).
Adaptive Behavior Assessment System – 2nd Edition (ABAS-II) – Teacher Form
Hans’s current 3rd-grade teacher completed the ABAS-II, and her ratings resulted in scores that fell into the deficient range in three
areas: social, self-direction, and leisure, because a score of 4 or lower is considered a deficiency.
Leisure Scaled Score = 4
Self-Direction Scaled Score = 2
Social Scaled Score = 2
Description of academic, developmental and/or functional strengths:
Hans’s teachers identified that he has strength in creativity and his artistic ability.
Hans’s teacher reported that his cognitive abilities in nonverbal reasoning and problem-solving skills were superior.
Hans’s teacher reported that he entered school with sufficient school readiness skills and adequate support in the home for the
development of academic skills.
Hans’s Emotional Disturbance Examination results reported that the demonstration of adequate orientation to person, place, and
time.
Description of academic, developmental and/or functional needs:
Hans’s teachers reported that he demonstrated significant inattention and hyperactivity/ impulsivity.
Hans’s teacher reported that he was likely to become angry when he experienced changes in his routine.
Hans’s teacher reported that he exhibited poor social skills in group and one-on-one settings with his peers, because he did not try to
make friends with other students, nor did he seem to understand why a peer might not wish to interact with him when he behaved in
an unusual manner due to little social communication, seeming indifferent to others’ attention, and not understanding humor/slang.
Hans’s teacher reported unusual motor behaviors (e.g., flapping hands or fingers, making rapid movements while moving from place
to place) and reported that Hans often behaved in a compulsive manner.
Parental concerns regarding their child’s education:
Hans’s parents reported that Hans often failed to predict probable consequences in social events and tended to talk about a single
subject excessively (e.g., video games).
Hans’s parents noted that he had heightened emotional responses to changes in routine, not being allowed to do something, and to
frustration.
Hans’s mother reported contrasting data to the CAB-P assessment, indicating that Hans did not demonstrate inattentive or
hyperactive/ impulsive behavior at home as the assessment said he did.
Hans’s parents reported that Hans often became frustrated by schoolwork, suggesting that the depressed feelings he demonstrated in
the classroom were a reaction to academic demands.
Impact of the disability on involvement and progress in the general education curriculum (for preschool, how the disability affects participation in appropriate
activities):
Hans’s teacher reported that his weaknesses in listening comprehension and interpreting spoken language negatively affected his
ability to listen, remember details, infer and predict, use critical thinking strategies, and increase vocabulary skills.
Hans’s 3rd-grade teacher reported that, in the classroom setting, Hans very often demonstrated inattentive, distractible, overly active,
and impulsive behavior, which caused difficulty with initiation and completion of difficult tasks and schoolwork.
Hans’s current teacher reported that “His behavior impedes his ability to get class instruction and apply it.”
Hans’s teacher reported that he was prone to forget things that he had already learned, and if Hans offered an incorrect answer, he
tended to become very angry and shut down.
Page 1 of 7
II. CONSIDERATION OF SPECIAL FACTORS
Georgia Department of Education
Model Form July 2011
Student Name: Hans Asperger Meeting Date: 1/07/15
a) Does the student have behavior which impedes his/her learning or the learning of others? Yes No
If yes, consider the appropriateness of developing a Behavior Intervention Plan.
Behavior Intervention Plan developed? Yes No
Refer to Behavior Intervention Plan for additional information.
g) Does the student require alternative format for instructional materials? Yes No
If yes, specify format(s) of materials required below.
Page 2 of 7
1. Through various social interventions, Hans will develop and 4 out of 5 trials Data collection 1 out of 5 trials 2 out of 5 trials 3 out of 5 trials 4 out of 5 trials
maintain age-appropriate relationships with his peers and teachers
by relating to his peers and interacting in typical ways.
3. Through the strategic utilization of prompting, to initiate and Less than 5 prompts per Data collection
school day for 4 weeks.
complete his assignments, Hans will gain the responsibility to self-
direct in the independent completion of his assignments.
4.
address assessed weaknesses in adaptive behavior in the areas of
Page 3 of 7
V. MEASURABLE ANNUAL GOALS & SHORT-TERM OBJECTIVES/BENCHMARKS
Academic and/or functional goals designed to meet the child’s needs that result from the disability to enable the child to be involved in and make progress in the general education curriculum or to meet each of the
child’s other educational needs that result from the disability.
Page 4 of 7
VII.ASSESSMENT DETERMINATION FOR DISTRICT AND STATEWIDE ASSESSMENTS FOR GRADES K-12
a) The student will participate in the following regular required assessments (Each state mandated test and subtest must be considered individually
and documented below).
Specific Testing Accommodations (Accommodations used for assessment must be consistent with accommodations used for classroom instruction/testing and
specified in the IEP. Some accommodations used for instruction may not be allowed for statewide assessment. Refer to the GaDOE Student Assessment
Handbook for the only allowable accommodations. Conditional accommodations are only allowable for students who meet eligibility criteria.) All subtests must
be considered individually. If the CRCT-M is considered, the Participation Guidelines for the CRCT-M must be completed and attached.
b) The student will participate in the Georgia Alternate Assessment (GAA) Yes No
If yes, provide a statement of why the child cannot participate in regular required assessment.
Collaborative
x Daily (02/01/15) (02/01/16) General Reading/English
Education Language Arts,
Teacher and Mathematics,
Co-teaching
Special Social Studies,
Education Science
Teacher
Supportive Services
Related Services
IX. SPECIAL EDUCATION: Instruction/Related Services Outside of the General Education Classroom
Options Initiation of Anticipated
Content/Specialty
Considered Frequency Services Duration Provider Title
Area(s)
(mm/dd/yy) (mm/dd/yy)
x 15 minutes daily (02/01/15) (02/01/16) Special Reading/English
Separate
Education Language Arts
Class/Resource Room
Teacher
Separate School
Home Instruction
Residential
Hospital/Homebound
x Supportive Services
x 2-3 days weekly for 1 hour (02/01/15) (02/01/16) Speech Receptive Language
Speech Pathology
Pathologist
Related Services
X. The explanation of the extent, if any, to which the child will not participate with peers without disabilities in the regular
class and/or in nonacademic and extracurricular activities:
Page 6 of 7
Initiation of Anticipated
Services Frequency Services Duration Provider Title Location
(mm/dd/yy) (mm/dd/yy)
Page 7 of 7