9706 Accounting: MARK SCHEME For The May/June 2014 Series
9706 Accounting: MARK SCHEME For The May/June 2014 Series
9706 Accounting: MARK SCHEME For The May/June 2014 Series
9706 ACCOUNTING
9706/23 Paper 2 (Structured Questions – Core),
maximum raw mark 90
This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of
the examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not
indicate the details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began,
which would have considered the acceptability of alternative answers.
Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner
Report for Teachers.
Cambridge will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes.
Cambridge is publishing the mark schemes for the May/June 2014 series for most IGCSE, GCE
Advanced Level and Advanced Subsidiary Level components and some Ordinary Level components.
Page 2 Mark Scheme Syllabus Paper
GCE AS/A LEVEL – May/June 2014 9706 23
$ $
Sales 7 690
Less cost of sales
Inventory on 1/4/2013 975
Add purchases 3 198 (1)
4 173
$ $
Shop profits 651
Subscriptions 7 000 (1)
Family day 2 300
Interest 300 (1) 10 251
Less expenses
Administration expenses 2 790
Repairs 2 450 (1)
Depreciation 1 869 (3) 7 109
Surplus 3 142
2 Bank loan
[Total: 30]
2 (a) Non-current assets generate profit for the business (1). Depreciation is a fall in value of a
non-current asset (1) due to wear and tear and other factors by making a charge against
income generated (1) reducing the profit and thereby applying the prudence concept (1).
(d) Assets suffer wear and tear, etc. and lose their value at different rates (1). This might
depend on the degree of use of the asset. Vehicles tend to lose more value in the early
years of use (1); hence the reducing balance method is more appropriate. Buildings tend to
lose value (1) more consistently over their lifetime; therefore, the straight line method tends
to be more appropriate (1). [4]
(e)
COST
DEPRECIATION
[16]
[Total: 30]
3 (a) Advantage: Easier to calculate (1) by avoiding the necessity to allocate and apportion costs
into departments. (1)
Disadvantage: Where different products spend differing amounts of time in departments (1)
there is a danger that product costs will be under or overstated. (1)
[4]
(b) $ 367 200 / 162 000 direct labour hours = $ 2.27 per direct labour hour (1) [1]
(d) Cutting: $ 161 313 / 84 000 direct labour hours (1) = $ 1.92 per direct labour hour (1of)
Sewing: $ 156 632 / 50 000 machine hours (1) = $ 3.13 per machine hour (1of)
Finishing: $ 49 255 / 56 000 direct labour hours (1) = $ 0.88 per direct labour hour (1of) [6]
(e)
Cutting Sewing Finishing
Actual overheads 168 180 146 320 51 870
Absorbed
$ 1.92 x 85 200 163 584
$ 3.13 x 52 450 164 169
$ 0.88 x 58 140 51 163
$ 4 596 (1of) $ 17 849 (1of) $ 707 (1of)
[Total: 30]