Scribd
Upload
99 views1 page

Rubric For Long Lab Report

This document outlines a rubric for marking a long report on an experiment conducted using DasyLab software. It evaluates the report on criteria such as the abstract (5 marks), objectives and theory with equations (10 marks), virtual instrumentation setup and procedures (15 marks), results and calculations (25 marks), discussion of results (20 marks), report format and presentation (10 marks), references and citations (5 marks), and conclusions (10 marks). A well performed report would include a comprehensive abstract, research, instrumentation description, results analysis, and conclusions that tie the experiment back to engineering applications.

Uploaded by

Ali Javed
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
99 views1 page

Rubric For Long Lab Report

This document outlines a rubric for marking a long report on an experiment conducted using DasyLab software. It evaluates the report on criteria such as the abstract (5 marks), objectives and theory with equations (10 marks), virtual instrumentation setup and procedures (15 marks), results and calculations (25 marks), discussion of results (20 marks), report format and presentation (10 marks), references and citations (5 marks), and conclusions (10 marks). A well performed report would include a comprehensive abstract, research, instrumentation description, results analysis, and conclusions that tie the experiment back to engineering applications.

Uploaded by

Ali Javed
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

BMM3511- Rubric for Long Report (with DasyLab) Marking

Marks
Criteria Description Weightage
awarded
Ability to summarize the experiment in concise manner
0 : No abstract presented
1 – 2: Only introduction and theory included in the abstract
Abstract 5
3-4: The abstract includes theory, objective and results
5 : The abstract discusses the theory, objective, methodology used,
results obtained and conclusion
Good coverage of the theories and demonstrate the
Objectives / Theory with ability to relate its significance to the experiment.
0 – 3: No theories 10
equations
4 – 7: Small amount of research is completed
8-10: Comprehensive research relevant to the topic is done
The ability to report the NI and Dasylab setup for data
Virtual instrumentation collection as well as ability to specify clear procedures in
(NI and Dasylab) setup for completing the experiment.
data collection / 0-5: No NI and Dasylab setup and pprocedures are copied from
previous semester students 15
6-10: Good NI and Dasylab setup but limited elaboration of the
Detail Experimental procedures of the experiment
Procedures 11-15: Complete description of both instrumentation and procedures
with sketches or other form of illustrations
Results to be presented professionally. Sketches and
graphs are drawn professionally where necessary.
Results / calculations 0: No results/calculation presented 25
1- 7: Minimum presentation of results/calculations
8-15: Basic results and/or calculations are shown.
16-25: Further analyses of the results using graphs, tables, etc.
Demonstrate the ability of analysing the theoretical
calculation and actual parametric results in an
independent and critical way. In-depth discussion is
presented on the variance of the actual testing results
with theoretical calculations, or the effect of the changing
Discussions 20
of any parameters to the results.
0- 5: Reiteration of the results
6 -10: Discuss the analyses of the results
11-15: Discuss the graphs and tables, etc.
16-20: Provide constructive suggestions for improvement with error
analyses of the results
The ability of presenting the neat and tidy report in the
format stated.
Format / Presentation 0-5: lack of standard format, structure and incomprehensible. 10
6-8:basic structure and format is presented
9-10:professional report with standard format and complete structure
and presentation
The ability to cite the referenced author’s work.
0: no citation, no reference.
References / Citations 1-2: no citation, only references 5
3:minimum citations and references
4-5: citations and references with correct format
The ability to draw conclusions
0-5: Provide summary of key findings from the experiment
Conclusions 6-8: Highlight the key indication of the results 10
9-11: Provide suggestion for further improvement
12-15: Relevancy of the project to the real-life engineering problems.

TOTAL 100

You might also like