Scribd
Upload
116 views15 pages

Integral Anti-Windup For PI Controllers: Fig. 1: Linear PI Controller

This document discusses various integral anti-windup schemes for PI controllers to address the integrator wind-up phenomenon that occurs due to actuator saturation. It presents 15 figures that illustrate different anti-windup techniques such as integrator clamping, conditional integration, tracking anti-windup, and preloading. These techniques aim to restrict integrator action or introduce feedback to prevent wind-up. The document also provides references for further reading on anti-windup strategies.

Uploaded by

Sereth
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
116 views15 pages

Integral Anti-Windup For PI Controllers: Fig. 1: Linear PI Controller

This document discusses various integral anti-windup schemes for PI controllers to address the integrator wind-up phenomenon that occurs due to actuator saturation. It presents 15 figures that illustrate different anti-windup techniques such as integrator clamping, conditional integration, tracking anti-windup, and preloading. These techniques aim to restrict integrator action or introduce feedback to prevent wind-up. The document also provides references for further reading on anti-windup strategies.

Uploaded by

Sereth
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 15

Integral Anti-Windup for PI Controllers

Fig. 1: Linear PI controller

Fig. 2: Actuator saturation → integrator wind-up phenomenon (discussed in


detail in [6])

1
Fig. 3: Limited integrator (hard limits imposed) → conditional integrator,
integrator clamping [5][3]

Fig. 4: Limited integrator (high feedback gain → Scheme 3) [4][1]

2
Fig. 5: Tracking anti-windup [4][1][2]

Fig. 6: Tracking anti-windup with unrestricted control signal (for actuators


described by linear dynamics followed by a saturation) [4][1]

3
Fig. 7: Tracking anti-windup, back-calculation (equivalent to Scheme 5) [4][1]

Fig. 8: Modified tracking anti-windup (introduction of an additional limit on


the proportional part of the control signal used to generate the anti-windup-
feedback signal) [4][1]

4
Fig. 9: Conditional integration (e (t) · i (t) > 0) → flexible limits (modified
Scheme 3)

5
Fig. 10: Integrator clamping (e (t) · u (t) > 0) → found to be the best [5][3]

6
Fig. 11: Preloading ≡ The integrator output i (t) is dynamically (bumpless
transfer protection) driven to the offline predetermined value id [3]

7
Fig. 12: Integral part variable limit (algorithm dynamically drives the inte-
grator so that p (t) + i (t) lies at the edge of the saturation region), proposed
in [3]

8
Fig. 13: Conditional integration combined with back-calculation approach
(proposed in [5])

9
Fig. 14: Scheme 5 and Scheme 10 performance comparison

10
Fig. 15: Direct Stator Field Oriented Control scheme

11
Fig. 16: Various DSFOC drive behaviour as a result of different PI anti-
windup configuration

12
Fig. 17: Model in StateFlow°
R
(Scheme 11)

13
Fig. 18: Continuous states vs. discrete StateFlow°
R

14
References
[1] C. Bohn and D. P. Atherton. An analysis package comparing pid anti-
windup strategies. IEEE Systems Magazine, 15(2):34—40, April 1995.

[2] M. Hamdan and Zhiqiang Gao. A novel pid controller for pneumatic pro-
portional valves with hysteresis. IEEE Industry Applications Conference,
2:1198—1201, October 2000.

[3] A. Scottedward Hodel and C. E. Hall. Variable-structure pid control to


prevent integrator windup. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics,
48(2):442—451, April 2001.

[4] M. Tharayil and A. Alleyne. A generalized pid error governing scheme


for smart/sbli control. IEEE American Control Conference, 1:346—351,
May 2002.

[5] A. Visioli. Modified anti-windup scheme for pid controllers. IEE Control
Theory and Applications, 150(1):49—54, January 2003.

[6] D. Vranc̆ić. Design of Anti-Windup and bumpless Transfer Protection.


PhD thesis, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia, 1997.

15

You might also like